Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2424519, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046736

RESUMEN

Importance: While the association between cross-sectional measures of social isolation and adverse health outcomes is well established, less is known about the association between changes in social isolation and health outcomes. Objective: To assess changes of social isolation and mortality, physical function, cognitive function, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a cohort design, social isolation changes in 4 years and subsequent risk of mortality and other outcomes were assessed using the 13 649 eligible Health and Retirement Study (HRS) respondents from the 2006 to 2020 waves. Data were analyzed from October 11, 2023, to April 26, 2024. Exposure: The main exposure was the change in social isolation measured by the Steptoe 5-item Social Isolation Index from the initial assessment to a second assessment conducted 4 years later. Participants were classified into decreased isolation, stable, or increased isolation groups, stratified by their baseline isolation status. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were mortality, self-reported dependencies in activities of daily living, Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementia, CVD, and stroke. Dementia, CVD, and stroke were assessed using HRS-linked Medicare records. Incidence rates (IRs) of each group were estimated and a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used, with inverse-probability treatment weighting to adjust for confounders. Results: Among 13 649 participants (mean [SD] age at baseline, 65.3 [9.5] years; 8011 [58.7%] women) isolated at baseline, those with increased isolation had higher mortality (n = 693; IR = 68.19; 95% CI, 60.89-76.36 per 1000 person-years) than those who were stable (n = 1796; IR = 44.02; 95% CI, 40.47-47.88 person-years) or had decreased isolation (n = 2067; IR = 37.77; 95% CI, 34.73-41.09 person-years) isolation. Increased isolation was associated with higher risks of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51), disability (AHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.09-1.67), and dementia (AHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.93) compared with stable isolation. Similar findings were observed among socially nonisolated participants at baseline. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, increased isolation was associated with elevated risks of mortality, disability, and dementia, irrespective of baseline isolation status. These results underscore the importance of interventions targeting the prevention of increased isolation among older adults to mitigate its adverse effects on mortality, as well as physical and cognitive function decline.


Asunto(s)
Aislamiento Social , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Masculino , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/mortalidad , Actividades Cotidianas , Mortalidad
2.
Antioxidants (Basel) ; 9(10)2020 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33096892

RESUMEN

The NRF transcription factors NRF1, NRF2, and NRF3, are a subset of Cap'n'collar transcriptional regulators which modulate the expression of genes harboring antioxidant-response element (ARE) sequences within their genomic loci. Despite the emerging physiological importance of NRF family members, the repertoire of their genetic targets remains incompletely defined. Here we use RNA-sequencing-based transcriptional profiling and quantitative proteomics to delineate the overlapping and differential genetic programs effected by the three NRF transcription factors. We then create consensus target gene sets regulated by NRF1, NRF2, and NRF3 and define the integrity of these gene sets for probing NRF activity in mammalian cell culture and human tissues. Together, our data provide a quantitative assessment of how NRF family members sculpt proteomes and transcriptomes, providing a framework to understand the critical physiological importance of NRF transcription factors and to establish pharmacologic approaches for therapeutically activating these transcriptional programs in disease.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA