Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 403(10434): 1351-1361, 2024 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care of screening and referring patients for treatment for symptoms, such as depression, pain, and fatigue, is not effective. This trial aimed to test the efficacy of an integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention versus standard of care for patients with cancer and at least one of the following symptoms: depression, pain, or fatigue. METHODS: This randomised, parallel, phase 3 trial was conducted in 29 oncology outpatient clinics associated with the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center in the USA. Patients (aged ≥21 years) with any cancer type and clinical levels of depression, pain, or fatigue (or all of these) were eligible. Eligible family caregivers were aged 21 years or older and providing care to a patient diagnosed with cancer who consented for this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to stepped collaborative care or standard of care using a central, permuted block design (sizes of 2, 4, and 6) stratified by sex and prognostic status. The biostatistician, oncologists, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. Stepped collaborative care was once-weekly cognitive behavioural therapy for 50-60 min from a care coordinator via telemedicine (eg, telephone or videoconferencing). Pharmacotherapy for symptoms might be initiated or changed if recommended by the treatment team or preferred by the patient. Standard of care was screening and referral to a health-care provider for treatment of symptoms. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life in patients at 6 months. Maintenance of the treatment benefits was assessed at 12 months. Participants included in the primary analysis were per intention to treat, which included patients missing one or both follow-up assessments. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02939755). FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2016, and April 8, 2021, 459 patients and 190 family caregivers were enrolled. 222 patients were assigned to standard of care and 237 to stepped collaborative care. Of 459 patients, 201 (44%) were male and 258 (56%) were female. Patients in the stepped collaborative care group had a greater 0-6-month improvement in health-related quality of life than patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·013, effect size 0·09). Health-related quality of life was maintained for the stepped collaborative care group (p=0·74, effect size 0·01). Patients in the stepped collaborative care group had greater 0-6-month improvements than the standard-of-care group in emotional (p=0·012), functional (p=0·042), and physical (p=0·033) wellbeing. No adverse events were reported by patients in either group and deaths were considered unrelated to the study. INTERPRETATION: An integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention, compared with the current standard of care, is recommended to improve health-related quality of life. The findings of this study will advance the implementation of guideline concordant care (screening and treatment) and has the potential to shift the practice of screening and treatment paradigm nationwide, improving outcomes for patients diagnosed with cancer. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Neoplasias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatiga , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Adulto
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 30, 2023 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36658543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Procalcitonin Antibiotic Consensus Trial (ProACT) found provision of a procalcitonin antibiotic prescribing guideline to hospital-based clinicians did not reduce antibiotic use. Possible reasons include clinician reluctance to follow the guideline, with an observed 64.8% adherence rate. In this study we sought to determine the threshold adherence rate for reduction in antibiotic use, and to explore opportunities to increase adherence. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of ProACT data. ProACT randomized 1656 patients presenting to 14 U.S. hospitals with suspected lower respiratory tract infection to usual care or provision of procalcitonin assay results and an antibiotic prescribing guideline to the treating clinicians. We simulated varying adherence to guideline recommendations for low procalcitonin levels and determined which threshold adherence rate could have resulted in rejection of the null hypothesis of no difference between groups at alpha = 0.05. We also performed sensitivity analyses within specific clinical settings and grouped patients initially prescribed antibiotics despite low procalcitonin into low, medium, and high risk of illness severity or bacterial infection. RESULTS: Our primary outcome was number of antibiotic-days by day 30 using an intention-to-treat approach and a null hypothesis of no difference in antibiotic use. We determined that an 84% adherence rate in the hospital setting (emergency department and inpatient) for low procalcitonin could have allowed rejection of the null hypothesis (3.7 vs 4.3 antibiotic-days, p = 0.048). The threshold adherence rate was 76% for continued guideline adherence after discharge. Even 100% adherence in the emergency department alone failed to reduce antibiotic-days. Of the 218 patients prescribed antibiotics in the emergency department despite low procalcitonin, 153 (70.2%) were categorized as low or medium risk. CONCLUSIONS: High adherence in the hospital setting to a procalcitonin antibiotic prescribing guideline is necessary to reduce antibiotic use in suspected lower respiratory tract infection. Continued guideline adherence after discharge and withholding of antibiotics in low and medium risk patients with low procalcitonin may offer impactful potential opportunities for antibiotic reduction. Trial registration Procalcitonin Antibiotic Consensus Trial (ProACT), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02130986. First posted May 6, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Calcitonina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biomarcadores , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e42892, 2023 02 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine delivered from primary care practices became widely available for children during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Focusing on children with a usual source of care, we aimed to examine factors associated with use of primary care telemedicine. METHODS: In February 2022, we surveyed parents of children aged ≤17 years on the AmeriSpeak panel, a probability-based panel of representative US households, about their children's telemedicine use. We first compared sociodemographic factors among respondents who did and did not report a usual source of care for their children. Among those reporting a usual source of care, we used Rao-Scott F tests to examine factors associated with parent-reported use versus nonuse of primary care telemedicine for their children. RESULTS: Of 1206 respondents, 1054 reported a usual source of care for their children. Of these respondents, 301 of 1054 (weighted percentage 28%) reported primary care telemedicine visits for their children. Factors associated with primary care telemedicine use versus nonuse included having a child with a chronic medical condition (87/301, weighted percentage 27% vs 113/753, 15%, respectively; P=.002), metropolitan residence (262/301, weighted percentage 88% vs 598/753, 78%, respectively; P=.004), greater internet connectivity concerns (60/301, weighted percentage 24% vs 116/753, 16%, respectively; P=.05), and greater health literacy (285/301, weighted percentage 96% vs 693/753, 91%, respectively; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: In a national sample of respondents with a usual source of care for their children, approximately one-quarter reported use of primary care telemedicine for their children as of 2022. Equitable access to primary care telemedicine may be enhanced by promoting access to primary care, sustaining payment for primary care telemedicine, addressing barriers in nonmetropolitan practices, and designing for lower health-literacy populations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , Padres , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención Primaria de Salud
4.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(1): 127-136, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639360

RESUMEN

Background: Pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) were a common reason for commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine use before the COVID-19 pandemic, but the factors associated with this use are unknown. Objective: To identify child and family factors associated with use of commercial DTC telemedicine for ARTIs in 2018-2019. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of claims data from the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Among children with ARTI visits, we fitted logit models to examine child and family characteristics associated with DTC telemedicine use. Results: Of 660,725 children with ARTI visits, 12,944 (2.0%) had ≥1 commercial DTC telemedicine encounter. The odds of DTC telemedicine use were higher for children with age ≥12 years, lower parent educational attainment, higher household income, white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, and residency in the West South Central census division. Conclusion: In 2018-2019, commercial DTC telemedicine use varied with child age, child race/ethnicity parent educational attainment, household income, and geography.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Telemedicina , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Haemophilia ; 28(5): 769-775, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major complication of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Among haemophilic (H) men, HCV is the leading cause of liver disease. Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) reduce HCV viral load, but impact on HCC is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult H and nonhaemophilic (NH) male discharges, with and without HCC, identified by ICD-10 codes in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, 2016-2018, with DAA availability. Analyses included discharge-level weights to reflect national estimates. Categorical variables were assessed by Rao-Scott chi-square and continuous variables by weighted simple linear regression. HCC correlates were determined by weighted multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 7,674,969 adult male discharges, 3730 H (.04%) were identified in 2016-2018, of whom 10.06% had HCV and 1.07% had HCC, significantly higher than NH (1.22% and .27%, respectively) all P < .001. Annual HCC rates were similar during the 3-year period (2016-2018) in H and NH. Among H, HCC is associated with older age and higher rates of HCV, HBV, NASH, end-stage liver disease, and Charlson comorbidity (CCI), each P < .001. Among HCC, H were younger and more likely HIV+, each P < .001, but less likely alcoholic (P = .018) or hyperlipidaemic (P = .008) compared to NH. In multivariable regression, risk factors for HCC among H included NASH (OR 21.6), HCV (OR 3.96), CCI (OR1.54), all P < .001, while HIV and hyperlipidaemia were protective. CONCLUSION: From 2016 to 2018, HCC rates did not change significantly in haemophilia discharges. NASH, HCV, and CCI are significant risks for HCC in haemophilia during the DAA-era.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Infecciones por VIH , Hemofilia A , Hepatitis C Crónica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Adulto , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Masculino , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(7): 927-935, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medicare requires that hospitals report on their adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of SEP-1 on treatment patterns and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of hospitals using repeated cross-sectional cohorts of patients. SETTING: 11 hospitals within an integrated health system. PATIENTS: 54 225 encounters between January 2013 and December 2017 for adults with sepsis who were hospitalized through the emergency department. INTERVENTION: Onset of the SEP-1 reporting requirement in October 2015. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in SEP-1-targeted processes, including antibiotic administration, lactate measurement, and fluid administration at 3 hours from sepsis onset; repeated lactate and vasopressor administration for hypotension within 6 hours of sepsis onset; and sepsis outcomes, including risk-adjusted intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality, and home discharge among survivors. RESULTS: Two years after its implementation, SEP-1 was associated with variable changes in process measures, with the greatest effect being an increase in lactate measurement within 3 hours of sepsis onset (absolute increase, 23.7 percentage points [95% CI, 20.7 to 26.7 percentage points]; P < 0.001). There were small increases in antibiotic administration (absolute increase, 4.7 percentage points [CI, 1.9 to 7.6 percentage points]; P = 0.001) and fluid administration of 30 mL/kg of body weight within 3 hours of sepsis onset (absolute increase, 3.4 percentage points [CI, 1.5 to 5.2 percentage points]; P < 0.001). There was no change in vasopressor administration. There was a small increase in ICU admissions (absolute increase, 2.0 percentage points [CI, 0 to 4.0 percentage points]; P = 0.055) and no changes in mortality (absolute change, 0.1 percentage points [CI, -0.9 to 1.1 percentage points]; P = 0.87) or discharge to home. LIMITATION: Data are from a single health system. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the SEP-1 mandatory reporting program was associated with variable changes in process measures, without improvements in clinical outcomes. Revising the measure may optimize its future effect. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Asunto(s)
Medicare/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Sepsis/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fluidoterapia , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Notificación Obligatoria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sepsis/sangre , Estados Unidos , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
7.
Kidney Int ; 100(3): 660-671, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940109

RESUMEN

For assessing human leukocyte antigen compatibility in deceased donor kidney transplantation, virtual crossmatch is used as an alternative to physical crossmatch and has potential to reduce cold ischemia time. The 2014 United States kidney allocation system prioritized highly sensitized candidates but led to increased shipping of kidneys. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we evaluated changes in virtual crossmatch use with the new allocation policy and the impact of virtual crossmatch use on cold ischemia time and transplant outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult deceased donor kidney recipients in the United States (2011-2018) transplanted with either 9,632 virtual or 71,839 physical crossmatches. Before allocation change, only 9% of transplants were performed relying on a virtual crossmatch. After the 2014 allocation change, this increased by 2.4%/year so that 18% transplants in 2018 were performed with just a virtual crossmatch. There was significant variation in virtual crossmatch use among transplant regions (range 0.7-36%) and higher use was noted among large volume centers. Compared to physical crossmatches, virtual crossmatches were significantly associated with shorter cold ischemia times (mean 15.0 vs 16.5 hours) and similar death-censored graft loss and mortality (both hazard ratios HR 0.99) at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Thus, our results show that virtual crossmatch is an attractive strategy for shortening cold ischemia time without negatively impacting transplant outcomes. Hence, strategies to optimize use and reduce practice variation may allow for maximizing benefits from virtual crossmatch.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Fría , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Riñón , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos
8.
Cancer ; 127(2): 257-265, 2021 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a pivotal role in combating the opioid crisis that currently grips the United States. Changing surgeon behavior is difficult, and the degree to which behavioral science can steer surgeons toward decreased opioid prescribing is unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, single-arm, pre- and postintervention study examining the prescribing of opioids by urologists for adult patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the quantity of opioids prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) after hospital discharge. The primary exposure was a multipronged behavioral intervention designed to decrease opioid prescribing. The intervention had 3 components: 1) formal education, 2) individual audit feedback, and 3) peer comparison performance feedback. There were 3 phases to the study: a pre-intervention phase, an intervention phase, and a washout phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients underwent prostatectomy, and 306 patients underwent nephrectomy. The median OMEs decreased from 195 to 19 in the prostatectomy patients and from 200 to 0 in the nephrectomy patients (P < .05 for both). The median OMEs prescribed did not increase during the washout phase. Prostatectomy patients discharged with opioids had higher levels of anxiety than patients discharged without opioids (P < .05). Otherwise, prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients discharged with and without opioids did not differ in their perception of postoperative pain management, activity levels, psychiatric symptoms, or somatic symptoms (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multipronged behavioral intervention significantly reduced opioid prescribing for patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy without compromising patient-reported outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Nefrectomía , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatectomía , Administración Oral , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Cirujanos/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Urólogos/psicología
9.
Haemophilia ; 27(3): 351-357, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33749970

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Obesity alters the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of drugs making it difficult to determine the appropriate dose when administering weight-based medications. Alternative descriptors of body weight, such as lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), are sometimes used in these situations. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label, 3 × 3 crossover trial to determine whether recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) dosing based on LBM and IBW achieves a targeted FVIII recovery with better precision than based on total body weight (TBW) in overweight and obese, adult males with haemophilia A. Participants were randomized to 1 of 6 possible FVIII concentrate dosing sequence scenarios (TBW, LBM and IBW). Recombinant FVIII was administered on 3 separate weeks following a washout period of at least 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 19 participants were randomized and completed the study. FVIII recovery was lower at 30 minutes post-rFVIII infusion in LBM vs TBW and IBW vs TBW-based dosing, mean difference -0.38 (95% CI: -0.56, -0.20) and -0.28 (95% CI: -0.47, -0.10) IU/dL per IU/kg, respectively. In LBM vs TBW and IBW vs TBW-based dosing, there was a non-significant increase in the proportion of participants with a targeted FVIII recovery of 2.00 ± 0.20 IU/dl per IU/kg, OR = 1.93 (95% CI: 0.44, 8.55) and OR = 3.65 (0.80, 16.72), respectively. DISCUSSION: Based on our study's findings, overweight and obese patients with haemophilia A may benefit from an individualized PK analysis using LBM and IBW to determine the most accurate, and potentially cost-effective, method of achieving targeted FVIII recovery.


Asunto(s)
Factor VIII , Hemofilia A , Adulto , Peso Corporal , Estudios Cruzados , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Peso Corporal Ideal , Masculino , Obesidad/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones
10.
Crit Care Med ; 48(10): 1411-1418, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931187

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Initial evidence suggests that state-level regulatory mandates for sepsis quality improvement are associated with decreased sepsis mortality. However, sepsis mandates require financial investments on the part of hospitals and may lead to increased spending. We evaluated the effects of the 2013 New York State sepsis regulations on the costs of care for patients hospitalized with sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using state discharge data from the U.S. Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project and a comparative interrupted time series analytic approach. Costs were calculated from admission-level charge data using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. SETTING: General, short stay, acute care hospitals in New York, and four control states: Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New Jersey. PATIENTS: All patients hospitalized with sepsis between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: The 2013 New York mandate that all hospitals develop and implement protocols for sepsis identification and treatment, educate staff, and report performance data to the state. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The analysis included 1,026,664 admissions in 520 hospitals. Mean unadjusted costs per hospitalization in New York State were $42,036 ± $60,940 in the pre-regulation period and $39,719 ± $59,063 in the post-regulation period, compared with $34,642 ± $52,403 pre-regulation and $31,414 ± $48,155 post-regulation in control states. In the comparative interrupted time series analysis, the regulations were not associated with a significant difference in risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization (p = 0.12) or risk-adjusted mean cost per hospital day (p = 0.44). For example, in the 10th quarter after implementation of the regulations, risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization was $3,627 (95% CI, -$681 to $7,934) more than expected in New York State relative to control states. CONCLUSIONS: Mandated protocolized sepsis care was not associated with significant changes in hospital costs in patients hospitalized with sepsis in New York State.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Sepsis/economía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Propiedad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
J Urol ; 204(4): 805-810, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267191

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Clinical trials serve as a critical source of information to guide evidence-based practices in urology. Conversely, trials that are abandoned consume significant resources and results are underreported in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for urology trials from 2006 to 2016. Trials were screened by 2 screeners for applicability to urology and disputes were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Overall 1,340 trials met final inclusion criteria (722 successful trials, 618 failed trials). Univariable analysis used Fisher's exact, chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Trial characteristics, including AUA (American Urological Association) section, phase, subspecialty, intervention type, source of funding and randomization were examined for association with failure using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Trial failure is associated with oncology subspecialty (adjusted odds ratio 2.25, 95% CI 1.60-3.18), infertility/andrology subspecialty (AOR 4.99, CI 1.60-17.61), device trials (AOR 1.64, CI 1.00-2.70) and combination funding by industry/government/grants (AOR 3.13, CI 2.21-4.48). Clinical trials in AUA sections were less likely to fail than international and multisectional trials. Among trials that failed, poor accrual was the primary reason for trial failure, comprising 41% of all failures. Other reasons for failure include inadequate budget (9%), sponsor cancellation (7%), poor interim results (7%) and toxicity (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite their significance, many urological trials fail prematurely due to poor accrual. Complex features inherent to oncology, andrology/infertility, devices and multisectional trials pose significant barriers to success.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Predicción , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas
12.
J Urol ; 203(1): 128-136, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361571

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To our knowledge it is unknown whether stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer is a substitute for other radiation treatments or surgery, or for expanding the pool of patients who undergo treatment instead of active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare we identified men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2007 and 2011. We developed physician-hospital networks by identifying the treating physician of each patient based on the primary treatment received and subsequently assigning each physician to a hospital. We examined the relative distribution of prostate cancer treatments stratified by whether stereotactic body radiation therapy was performed in a network by fitting logistic regression models with robust SEs to account for patient clustering in networks. RESULTS: We identified 344 physician-hospital networks, including 30 (8.7%) and 314 (91.3%) in which stereotactic body radiation therapy was and was not performed, respectively. Networks in which that therapy was and was not done did not differ with time in the performance of robotic and radical prostatectomy, and active surveillance (all p >0.05). The relationship with intensity modulated radiation therapy did not show any consistent temporal pattern. In networks in which it was performed less intensity modulated radiation therapy was initially done but there were similar rates in later years. Brachytherapy trends differed among networks in which stereotactic body radiation therapy was vs was not performed with a lower brachytherapy rate in networks in which stereotactic body radiation therapy was done (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and active surveillance rates did not differ in networks in which stereotactic body radiation therapy was vs was not performed but when that therapy was done there was a lower brachytherapy rate. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may represent more of an alternative to brachytherapy than to active surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos
13.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(4): e13230, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32026559

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with PET scan use in the pre-operative evaluation of patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. METHODS: Using SEER-Medicare data, we identified bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2006 to 2011 (n = 4,138). The primary outcome was PET scan use within 6 months before surgery. To examine predictors of PET scan use, we fit a mixed logit model with health service area as a random effect to account for patients nested within health service areas. We also calculated the adjusted probability of use over time and examined variation among the highest volume surgeons. RESULTS: Among the 4,138 patients, 406 (10%) received a pre-operative PET scan. The adjusted probability of a patient undergoing a PET scan increased from 0.04 in 2004 to 0.10 in 2011 (p < .001). Among the 78 highest volume surgeons, there was significant variation in PET scan use (p < .001). Patients with non-urothelial histology, measurement of alkaline phosphatase levels, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive PET scan (all p < .05). CONCLUSION: Use of PET prior to radical cystectomy doubled over a 5-year period, suggesting its increased use in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, particularly those with high-risk disease. Whether its use is warranted and improves patient outcomes is not clear and requires further studies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico por imagen , Cistectomía , Medicare , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Músculo Liso/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Cuidados Preoperatorios/tendencias , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria
14.
Haemophilia ; 25(2): 221-228, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30615816

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Among haemophilic (H) men, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of liver disease and mortality, but demographics and risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in H are not well known. METHODS: Adult discharges in H and non-haemophilic (NH) men, with and without HCC were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 1998 and 2014, using ICD-9 codes. Analyses included NIS-provided discharge-level weights to reflect national estimates. Categorical variables were assessed by Rao-Scott chi-square and continuous variables by weighted simple linear regression. HCC predictors were determined by weighted multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 18 098 H, 144 (0.79%) had HCC between 1998 and 2014. Adjusted rates of HCC increased 3.0-fold in H vs 1.7-fold in NH (P = 0.484). Among HCV+, HCC rates adjusted for HIV, increased 2.2-fold in H vs 1.7-fold in NH (P = 0.740), while among HIV+, HCC increased 1.4-fold in H vs 0.2-fold in NH (P = 0.448). Among those with HCC, H were older than NH (P < 0.001), Caucasian (P = 0.006), platelet transfusion recipients (P < 0.001), with greater comorbidity (P < 0.001) and mortality (P < 0.006). H with HCC also had greater rates of HCV and HIV (each P < 0.001), lower rates of alcoholism and hyperlipidemia (each P < 0.001), and similar rates of HBV (P = 0.866), smoking (P = 0.507) and obesity (P = 0.502). In multivariable logistic regression, HCV was a strong predictor for HCC in haemophilia, (OR: 15.42, 95% CI: 8.75-27.16). DISCUSSION: Haemophilic men have increasing rates of HCC, similar to men without haemophilia. HCV is the major predictor of HCC in haemophilia. Future trends in HCC will depend on the impact of newer HCV antiviral therapy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Hemofilia A/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
BJU Int ; 123(6): 968-975, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rate and determinants of palliative care use amongst Medicare beneficiaries with bladder cancer and encourage a national dialogue on improving coordinated urological, oncological, and palliative care in patients with genitourinary malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) between 2008 and 2013. Our primary outcome was receipt of palliative care, defined as the presence of a claim submitted by a Hospice and Palliative Medicine subspecialist. We examined determinants of palliative care use using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Over the study period, 7303 patients were diagnosed with MIBC and 262 (3.6%) received palliative care. Of 2185 patients with advanced bladder cancer, defined as either T4, N+ , or M+ disease, 90 (4.1%) received palliative care. Most patients that received palliative care (>80%, >210/262) did so within 24 months of diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, patients receiving palliative care were more likely to be younger, female, have greater comorbidity, live in the central USA, and have undergone radical cystectomy as opposed to a bladder-sparing approach. The adjusted probability of receiving palliative care did not significantly change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care provides a host of benefits for patients with cancer, including improved spirituality, decrease in disease-specific symptoms, and better functional status. However, despite strong evidence for incorporating palliative care into standard oncological care, use in patients with bladder cancer is low at 4%. This study provides a conservative baseline estimate of current palliative care use and should serve as a foundation to further investigate physician-, patient-, and system-level barriers to this care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Programa de VERF , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
16.
JAMA ; 322(3): 240-250, 2019 07 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310298

RESUMEN

Importance: Beginning in 2013, New York State implemented regulations mandating that hospitals implement evidence-based protocols for sepsis management, as well as report data on protocol adherence and clinical outcomes to the state government. The association between these mandates and sepsis outcomes is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association between New York State sepsis regulations and the outcomes of patients hospitalized with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with sepsis in New York State and in 4 control states (Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) using all-payer hospital discharge data (January 1, 2011-September 30, 2015) and a comparative interrupted time series analytic approach. Exposures: Hospitalization for sepsis before (January 1, 2011-March 31, 2013) vs after (April 1, 2013-September 30, 2015) implementation of the 2013 New York State sepsis regulations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit admission rates, central venous catheter use, Clostridium difficile infection rates, and hospital length of stay. Results: The final analysis included 1 012 410 sepsis admissions to 509 hospitals. The mean age was 69.5 years (SD, 16.4 years) and 47.9% were female. In New York State and in the control states, 139 019 and 289 225 patients, respectively, were admitted before implementation of the sepsis regulations and 186 767 and 397 399 patients, respectively, were admitted after implementation of the sepsis regulations. Unadjusted 30-day in-hospital mortality was 26.3% in New York State and 22.0% in the control states before the regulations, and was 22.0% in New York State and 19.1% in the control states after the regulations. Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics as well as preregulation temporal trends and season, mortality after implementation of the regulations decreased significantly in New York State relative to the control states (P = .02 for the joint test of the comparative interrupted time series estimates). For example, by the 10th quarter after implementation of the regulations, adjusted absolute mortality was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.0% to 5.4%) lower than expected in New York State relative to the control states (P = .004). The regulations were associated with no significant differences in intensive care unit admission rates (P = .09) (10th quarter adjusted difference, 2.8% [95% CI, -1.7% to 7.2%], P = .22), a significant relative decrease in hospital length of stay (P = .04) (10th quarter adjusted difference, 0.50 days [95% CI, -0.47 to 1.47 days], P = .31), a significant relative decrease in the C difficile infection rate (P < .001) (10th quarter adjusted difference, -1.8% [95% CI, -2.6% to -1.0%], P < .001), and a significant relative increase in central venous catheter use (P = .02) (10th quarter adjusted difference, 4.8% [95% CI, 2.3% to 7.4%], P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In New York State, mandated protocolized sepsis care was associated with a greater decrease in sepsis mortality compared with sepsis mortality in control states that did not implement sepsis regulations. Because baseline mortality rates differed between New York and comparison states, it is uncertain whether these findings are generalizable to other states.


Asunto(s)
Regulación Gubernamental , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sepsis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Am J Transplant ; 18(9): 2175-2181, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29758130

RESUMEN

Recent Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network bylaw revisions mandate that US transplant programs have an "approved pediatric component" in order to perform heart transplantation (HT) in patients <18 years old. The impact of this change on adolescents, a group known to be at high risk for graft loss and nonadherence, is unknown. We studied all US primary pediatric (age <18 years) HT from 2000 to 2015 to compare graft survival between centers organized mainly for adult versus pediatric care. Centers were designated as pediatric- or adult-specialty care according to the ratio of pediatric:adult HT performed and minimum age of HT (pediatric-specialty defined as ratio>0.7; adult-specialty ratio<0.05 and minimum age >8 years). In propensity score-matched cohorts, we observed no difference in graft loss by center type (median survival: adult 12.4 years vs pediatric 9.2 years, P = .174). Compared to the matched pediatric cohort, adult-specialty center recipients lived closer to their transplant center (31 vs 45 miles, P = .012), and trended toward fewer out-of-state transplants (15 vs 25%, P = .082). Our data suggest that select adolescents can achieve similar midterm graft survival at centers organized primarily for adult HT care. Regardless of post-HT setting, the development of care models that demonstrably improve adherence may be of greatest benefit to improving survival of this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Can J Urol ; 25(2): 9255-9261., 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680003

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesia is an effective way to control pain and limit opioid use after surgery. The quadratus lumborum block and paravertebral block are two regional anesthesia techniques that leverage multimodal analgesia to improve postoperative pain control. We sought to compare the efficacy of these blocks for pain management following radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of radical cystectomy patients who received bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks (n = 125) or bilateral single shot quadratus lumborum blocks (n = 50) between 2014-2016. The primary outcome was postoperative opiate consumption on day 0. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain scores and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Quadratus lumborum block patients had similar opioid use on postoperative day 0 compared with paravertebral block patients (29 mg versus 30 mg, p = 0.90). Pain scores on postoperative day 0 were similar between quadratus lumborum block and paravertebral block groups (4.0 versus 3.8, p = 0.72); however, the paravertebral block group had lower pain scores on days 1-3 compared with the quadratus lumborum block group (all p < 0.05). Hospital length of stay was similar between groups (6.6 days versus 6.2 days, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in opioid consumption among patients receiving bilateral single shot quadratus lumborum blocks and bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks after radical cystectomy. These data suggest that the quadratus lumborum block is a viable alternative for delivering multimodal analgesia in cystectomy patients.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Cistectomía/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
19.
Cancer ; 123(15): 2945-2954, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28301689

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several new prostate cancer treatments have emerged since 2000, including 2 radiotherapies with similar efficacy at the time of their introduction: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The objectives of this study were to compare their early adoption patterns and identify factors associated with their use. METHODS: By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, patients who received radiation therapy during the 5 years after IMRT introduction (2001-2005) and the 5 years after SBRT introduction (2007-2011) were identified. The outcome of interest was the receipt of new radiation therapy (ie, IMRT or SBRT) compared with the existing standard radiation therapies at that time. The authors fit a series of multivariable, hierarchical logistic regression models accounting for patients nested within health service areas to examine the factors associated with the receipt of new radiation therapy. RESULTS: During 2001 to 2005, 5680 men (21%) received IMRT compared with standard radiation (n = 21,555). Men who received IMRT were older, had higher grade tumors, and lived in more populated areas (P < .05). During 2007 through 2011, 595 men (2%) received SBRT compared with standard radiation (n = 28,255). Men who received ng SBRT were more likely to be white, had lower grade tumors, lived in more populated areas, and were more likely to live in the Northeast (P < .05). Adjusting for cohort demographic and clinical factors, the early adoption rate for IMRT was substantially higher than that for SBRT (44% vs 4%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a stark contrast in the adoption rates of IMRT and SBRT at the time of their introduction. Further investigation of the nonclinical factors associated with this difference is warranted. Cancer 2017;123:2945-54. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Radiocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare , Análisis Multivariante , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos
20.
Cancer ; 122(20): 3199-3206, 2016 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27379732

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are several effective treatments for prostate cancer. To what extent a patient's functional status influences the treatment decision is unknown. This study examined the association between functional status and treatment among older men with prostate cancer. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data were used to identify men who were 65 years old or older and were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2009. The primary outcome was treatment choice: conservative management, surgery, or radiation within 1 year of the diagnosis. The exposure was the functional status assessed as 4 measures within 3 domains: 1) physical function (activities of daily living [ADLs] and physical component summary score), 2) cognitive function (survey completer: self vs proxy), and 3) emotional well-being (mental component summary score). A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression was fitted with adjustments for several patient, tumor, and regional characteristics. RESULTS: This study identified 508 conservative management patients, 195 surgery patients, and 603 radiation patients. Compared with men with no ADL dependency, those with any ADL dependency had lower odds of receiving surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.99) or radiation (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78) versus conservative management. ADL dependency did not differ when surgery and radiation were compared. Patients with a proxy survey response were less likely to receive surgery or radiation versus conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Functional status is associated with treatment choice for men with prostate cancer. Future research should examine whether this is due to physician recommendations, patient preferences, or a combination. Cancer 2016;122:3199-206. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Conducta de Elección , Medicare Part C/estadística & datos numéricos , Prioridad del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA