RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between cannabis use during pregnancy and the risk for long-term neuropsychiatric pathology in the offspring. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched until January 22, 2024, with no language or date restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported quantitative data on any long-term neuropsychiatric outcome in offspring whose mothers used cannabis during pregnancy for medical or recreational use, by any route and at any trimester, in comparison to offspring of women who abstained from cannabis use during pregnancy. All observational study designs were included in the analysis. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The data was extracted independently by two reviewers. The following offspring outcomes were of interest: attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), depression, anxiety, psychotic disorders, as well as cannabis and other substance use. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for each neuropsychiatric outcome in the offspring of women exposed to cannabis during pregnancy compared with non-exposed. Data were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Eighteen eligible observational studies were included in the systematic review, and seventeen were included in the final quantitative analysis, representing 534,445 participants. After adjusting for confounders, the pooled OR for ADHD was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.26); for ASD, the pooled OR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.74-1.46); for psychotic symptoms, the pooled OR was 1.29 (95% CI 0.97-1.72); for anxiety, the pooled OR was 1.34 (95% CI 0.79-2.29); for depression, the pooled OR was 0.72 (95% CI 0.11-4.57); and for offspring's cannabis use the pooled OR was 1.20 (95% CI 1.01-1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal cannabis exposure is not associated with an increased risk of ASD, psychotic symptoms, anxiety, or depression in offspring. However, it may slightly elevate the risk of ADHD and predispose offspring to cannabis consumption. Despite these findings, caution is warranted regarding cannabis use during pregnancy. Further research is imperative, especially given the increasing potency of cannabis in recent years.
RESUMEN
There is a potential link between cannabis and mental disorders. Cannabis exposure involves in many cases negative mental emotions, which are unpleasant sensations or thoughts. Whereas mild cases of negative mental emotions inflict patient's quality of life, more severe cases lead to therapy discontinuations, or even hospitalizations and death. This study characterizes cannabis users who experienced negative mental emotions after cannabis exposure. The Releaf App database was utilized to evaluate the association between personal and cannabis use characteristics on reporting a negative mental emotion during cannabis exposure. This global mobile lets individuals track real-time cannabis experience use with cannabinoid-based products, containing data points such as gender, age, reasons for use, product type, cannabis composition, and feelings and emotions experienced after cannabis use. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed, adjusting for potential confounders such as gender and previous experience with cannabis use. The study population comprised 4,435 users, and 34,279 sessions were collected from various countries, mainly from North America, and included in the primary analysis. Reporting on negative mental emotions was associated with users in the age group of 18-30 years. Using cannabis for a mental purpose was associated with a small increase in reporting on negative mental emotions (OR = 1.10, 95%CI [1.03-1.19]). Oral products were associated with reporting on negative mental emotions. THC-dominant products were associated with reporting negative mental emotions compared to balanced products (OR = 1.21, 95%CI [1.06-1.38]). This study suggests that some characteristics of cannabis use, such as young age and oral consumption are associated with negative mental emotions. Further studies should examine the interface between cannabis consumption, characteristics of consumers, and negative emotional experience or even long-term mental disorders.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Community rehabilitation is crucial for the long-term treatment of people with chronic psychotic disorder. Ethnic minorities are less likely to seek care and have accessible treatment. This study examines whether the use of rehabilitation services and the relationship between rehabilitation and number of hospitalization days differ between Arabs and Jews. METHODS: Data from the Israel National Psychiatric Case Register on 18,684 adults with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorders hospitalized in 1963-2016 were merged with data from the national Mental Rehabilitation Register. Associations between the use of rehabilitation services and demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed through logistic regression modeling. Associations between ethnicity and duration of rehabilitation (housing or vocational) and annual hospitalization days during Period1: 2001-2009 and Period2: 2010-2016 were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: Among Jewish patients (N = 2556), 37% and 57% used rehabilitation services during Period1 and Period2, respectively, compared with 18% and 40% among Arab patients (N = 15,145) (p < 0.0001). The use of rehabilitation services was significantly higher among Jews (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI 2.07-2.47). Average duration of housing and vocational rehabilitation services did not differ between Arab and Jewish patients. In both groups, duration of rehabilitation was inversely associated with annual hospitalization days. CONCLUSIONS: The ethnic disparity in the use of rehabilitation services has narrowed over time, yet remains. Although fewer Arab patients use rehabilitation, Jewish and Arab benefit similarly from the services with regard to reduced hospitalization days. To further close the ethnic gap, greater efforts must be made to expand the availability of culturally appropriate rehabilitation services for the Arab minority.
RESUMEN
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has multiple ramifications for pregnant women. Untreated depression during pregnancy may have long-term effects on the mother and offspring. Therefore, delineating the effects of pregnancy on the mental health of reproductive-age women is crucial. This study aims to determine the risk for depressive symptoms in pregnant and non-pregnant women during COVID-19, and to identify its bio-psycho-social contributors. A total of 1114 pregnant and 256 non-pregnant women were recruited via social media in May 2020 to complete an online survey that included depression and anxiety questionnaires, as well as demographic, obstetric and COVID-19-related questionnaires. Pregnant women also completed the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS). Pregnant women reported fewer depressive symptoms and were less concerned that they had COVID-19 than non-pregnant women. Among pregnant women, risk factors for depression included lower income, fewer children, unemployment, thinking that one has COVID-19, high-risk pregnancy, earlier gestational age, and increased pregnancy-related stress. Protective factors included increased partner support, healthy behaviors, and positive appraisal of the pregnancy. Thus, being pregnant is associated with reduced risk for depressive symptoms during the pandemic. Increased social support, engaging in health behaviors and positive appraisal may enhance resilience. Future studies of pregnant versus non-pregnant women could clarify the role of pregnancy during stressful events, and clarify aspects of susceptibility and resilience during pregnancy.