Validity of salt intake assessment system based on a 24-h dietary recall method using a touch panel computer.

BACKGROUND: An electronic system for salt intake assessment using a 24-h dietary recall method has been developed in Japan. We evaluated the validity of this salt intake system for assessing salt intake. METHODS: We prospectively obtained data on estimated salt intake using 24-hour urinary sodium excretion (24-hUNaCl) and salt intake by the salt intake assessment system from 203 consecutive outpatients with essential hypertension (age: 67.8 ± 10.7 years; 53.7% men). RESULTS: Mean values were 9.7 ± 2.9 g/day for 24-hUNaCl and 9.1 ± 2.9 g/day for the salt intake assessment system before corrections. The salt intake estimated by the present system was significantly correlated with 24-hUNaCl (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). After corrections for habitual use of discretionary seasonings, habitual intake of salty foods, and physical activity, correlation coefficients between salt intake and 24-hUNaCl increased from 0.60 to 0.66 in men <65 years, from 0.80 to 0.81 in men ≥ 65 years, from 0.64 to 0.75 in women <65 years, and from 0.52 to 0.59 in women ≥ 65 years. After further correction for regional differences in average salt intake, the correlation coefficient reached 0.72 in all patients. CONCLUSION: After correction for dietary habits, lifestyle factors, and differences in average salt intake by region, this system may be a useful tool in Japan to encourage salt restriction in the clinical treatment of hypertension and improve public health in terms of salt restriction overall.

Evaluation of panipenem/betamipron (PAPM/BP) in pneumonia in elderly patients.

The present multicenter study evaluated the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of panipenem/betamipron (PAPM/BP) for treating pneumonia in elderly patients. Forty-three episodes of pneumonia in 43 patients were treated with PAPM/BP as the sole antibiotic agent. All patients were 65 years of age or older, and were given PAPM/BP at a total daily dosage range of 0.5-2.0 g. The clinical efficacy rate, expressed as a percentage of the total number of excellent and good responses, was 56.4%. Of the 43 patients, 13 were evaluated bacteriologically. In these 13 patients, the eradication rate, expressed as a percentage of the total number of "eradicated" and "replaced" efficacies, was 30.8%. Adverse effects and abnormal laboratory findings occurred in 2 patients, which was 4.6% of the total number of patients evaluated. No serious adverse effects were observed. We concluded that PAPM/BP was well tolerated overall, and was effective and safe for most of the elderly patients.