Exact test and exact confidence interval for the Cox model.

The Cox proportional hazards model is commonly used to analyze time-to-event data in clinical trials. Standard inference procedures for the Cox model are based on asymptotic approximations and may perform poorly when there are few events in one or both treatment groups, as may be the case when the event of interest is rare or when the experimental treatment is highly efficacious. In this article, we propose an exact test of equivalence and efficacy under a proportional hazard model with treatment effect as the only fixed effect, together with an exact confidence interval that is obtained by inverting the exact test. The proposed test is based on a conditional error method originally proposed for sample size reestimation problems. In the present context, the conditional error method is used to combine information from a sequence of hypergeometric distributions, one at each observed event time. The proposed procedures are evaluated in simulation studies and illustrated using real data from an HIV prevention trial. A companion R package "ExactCox" is available for download on CRAN.

Information-based group sequential design for post-market safety monitoring of medical products using real world data.

Real world healthcare data are commonly used in post-market safety monitoring studies to address potential safety issues related to newly approved medical products. Such studies typically involve repeated evaluations of accumulating safety data with respect to pre-defined hypotheses, for which the group sequential design provides a rigorous and flexible statistical framework. A major challenge in designing a group sequential safety monitoring study is the uncertainty associated with product uptake, which makes it difficult to specify the final sample size or maximum duration of the study. To deal with this challenge, we propose an information-based group sequential design which specifies a target amount of information that would produce adequate power for detecting a clinically significant effect size. At each interim analysis, the variance estimate for the treatment effect of interest is used to compute the current information time, and a pre-specified alpha spending function is used to determine the stopping boundary. The proposed design can be applied to regression models that adjust for potential confounders and/or heterogeneous treatment exposure. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed design performs reasonably well in realistic settings.

Controlling alpha for mixed effects models for repeated measures.

Mixed Effects Models for Repeated Measures (MMRM) is often used in clinical trials with longitudinal data. However, there has not been an in-depth examination available on how investigators can implement interim analysis while also controlling the overall alpha for clinical trials under an MMRM analysis framework. Statistical independence among measurements, which is often assumed in group sequential testing (GST), is not valid under an MMRM framework due to the correlations induced by longitudinal within-subject measurements. Therefore, methods associated with GST derived under independence need to be adjusted accordingly. While these correlations can be estimated from the study data, regulatory agencies may not accept results based on these estimated correlations since there is no guarantee that the overall alpha is strongly controlled. In this article, we propose a new AC-Hybrid-approach for controlling the overall alpha. The AC-Hybrid-approach has two key attributes. First, we apply the MMRM analysis framework on all available data at every analysis timepoint. Second, we use complete-case information fractions to derive the group sequential stopping boundaries. We prove that the overall alpha is controlled regardless of the correlations among within-subject measurements. We also show the impact of this approach on the alpha and the power through examples.

The oral toll-like receptor-7 agonist GS-9620 in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: GS-9620 is an oral agonist of toll-like receptor 7, a pattern-recognition receptor whose activation results in innate and adaptive immune stimulation. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GS-9620 in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: In two double-blind, phase 1b trials of identical design, 49 treatment-naïve and 51 virologically suppressed patients were randomized 5:1 to receive GS-9620 (at doses of 0.3mg, 1mg, 2mg, 4mg) or placebo as a single dose or as two doses seven days apart. Pharmacodynamic assessment included evaluation of peripheral mRNA expression of interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), serum interferon gamma-induced protein 10 and serum interferon (IFN)-alpha. RESULTS: Overall, 74% of patients were male and 75% were HBeAg negative at baseline. No subject discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Fifty-eight percent experienced ⩾1 adverse event, all of which were mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse event was headache. No clinically significant changes in HBsAg or HBV DNA levels were observed. Overall, a transient dose-dependent induction of peripheral ISG15 gene expression was observed peaking within 48 hours of dosing followed by return to baseline levels within seven days. Higher GS-9620 dose, HBeAg positive status, and low HBsAg level at baseline were independently associated with greater probability of ISG15 response. Most patients (88%) did not show detectable levels of serum IFN-alpha at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Oral GS-9620 was safe, well tolerated, and associated with induction of peripheral ISG15 production in the absence of significant systemic IFN-alpha levels or related symptoms.

Denosumab and bone-metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in men with prostate cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that osteoclast inhibition might prevent bone metastases. We assessed denosumab, a fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody, for prevention of bone metastasis or death in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at high risk of bone metastasis (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥8·0 µg/L or PSA doubling time ≤10·0 months, or both) were enrolled at 319 centres from 30 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by PSA eligibility criteria and previous or ongoing chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Patients, investigators, and all people involved in study conduct were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was bone-metastasis-free survival, a composite endpoint determined by time to first occurrence of bone metastasis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) or death from any cause. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. The masked treatment phase of the trial has been completed. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00286091. FINDINGS: 1432 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (716 denosumab, 716 placebo). Denosumab significantly increased bone-metastasis-free survival by a median of 4·2 months compared with placebo (median 29·5 [95% CI 25·4-33·3] vs 25·2 [22·2-29·5] months; hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·98, p=0·028). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to first bone metastasis (33·2 [95% CI 29·5-38·0] vs 29·5 [22·4-33·1] months; HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·71-0·98, p=0·032). Overall survival did not differ between groups (denosumab, 43·9 [95% CI 40·1-not estimable] months vs placebo, 44·8 [40·1-not estimable] months; HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·85-1·20, p=0·91). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups, except for osteonecrosis of the jaw and hypocalcaemia. 33 (5%) patients on denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the jaw versus none on placebo. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 12 (2%) patients on denosumab and two (<1%) on placebo. INTERPRETATION: This large randomised study shows that targeting of the bone microenvironment can delay bone metastasis in men with prostate cancer. FUNDING: Amgen Inc.

Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Giant-cell tumour (GCT) of bone is a primary osteolytic bone tumour with low metastatic potential and is associated with substantial skeletal morbidity. GCT is rich in osteoclast-like giant cells and contains mononuclear (stromal) cells that express RANK ligand (RANKL), a key mediator of osteoclast activation. We investigated the potential therapeutic effect of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, on tumour-cell survival and growth in patients with GCT. METHODS: In this open-label, single-group study, 37 patients with recurrent or unresectable GCT were enrolled and received subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg monthly (every 28 days), with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of month 1. The primary endpoint was tumour response, defined as elimination of at least 90% of giant cells or no radiological progression of the target lesion up to week 25. Study recruitment is closed; patient treatment and follow-up are ongoing. The study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00396279. FINDINGS: Two patients had insufficient histology or radiology data for efficacy assessment. 30 of 35 (86%; 95% CI 70-95) of evaluable patients had a tumour response: 20 of 20 assessed by histology and 10 of 15 assessed by radiology. Adverse events were reported in 33 of 37 patients; the most common being pain in an extremity (n=7), back pain (n=4), and headache (n=4). Five patients had grade 3-5 adverse events, only one of which (grade 3 increase in human chorionic gonadotropin concentration not related to pregnancy) was deemed to be possibly treatment related. Five serious adverse events were reported although none were deemed treatment related. INTERPRETATION: Further investigation of denosumab as a therapy for GCT is warranted. FUNDING: Amgen, Inc.

Genomic modeling of hepatitis B virus integration frequency in the human genome.

Hepatitis B infection is a world-wide public health burden causing serious liver complications. Previous studies suggest that hepatitis B integration into the human genome plays a crucial role in triggering oncogenic process and may also constitutively produce viral antigens. Despite the progress in HBV biology and sequencing technology, our fundamental understanding of how many hepatocytes in the liver actually carry viral integrations is still lacking. Herein we provide evidence that the HBV virus integrates with a lower-bound frequency of 0.84 per diploid genome in hepatitis B positive hepatocellular cancer patients. Moreover, we calculate that integrated viral DNA generates ~80% of the HBsAg transcripts in these patients. These results underscore the need to re-evaluate the clinical end-point and treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B patients.

Single-arm, open label study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemotherapy naïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcomes of an expanded access program.

BACKGROUND: An expanded access program (EAP) provided patient access to pemetrexed prior to its commercial availability. The current report consists of US patients in the EAP who had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Eligible patients had a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma that was not amenable to curative treatment with surgery. Study treatment consisted of pemetrexed 500mg/m(2) in combination with cisplatin 75mg/m(2) once every 21 days. Vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone were administered as prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by investigators and compiled in a pharmacovigilance database for all patients enrolled in the EAP. RESULTS: Of 1056 patients receiving at least one dose of pemetrexed in the EAP, 728 had chemotherapy naïve pleural mesothelioma. Median age of this group was 70 years (range 23-89 years) and 84% were male. Among 615 patients, overall response rate was 20.5%, including 12 complete responses (2.0%) and 114 partial responses (18.5%). An additional 290 patients (47.2%) had stable disease. Median survival for all 728 patients was 10.8 months (95% CI=9.8, 12.3; 60.3% censorship) and 1 year survival was 45.4%. The most commonly reported SAEs in the overall EAP irrespective of causality were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), vomiting (4.9%), dyspnea (3.8%), and pulmonary embolism (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, 67.7% of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy experienced a response or stable disease. Survival time and toxicity from this EAP were promising for this difficult-to-treat disease.

Administration of pemetrexed immediately following gemcitabine as front-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed and gemcitabine have demonstrated independent anti-tumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of these two therapies may produce synergistic anti-tumor effects. Previous studies of this combination have included a 90-min separation between the two drugs. More recent preclinical studies have suggested that this delay in administration might be unnecessary. This phase II study was designed to determine the objective tumor response rate and toxicity when pemetrexed was administered immediately after gemcitabine on day 1. METHODS: Chemonaïve patients stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC were enrolled. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-min i.v. infusion, immediately following gemcitabine, on day 1) every 21 days. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. RESULTS: The 53 enrolled patients completed a total of 199 cycles (median=4.0, mean=3.8). Best tumor response consisted of 1 complete response (2.0%), 15 partial responses (30.6%), 17 with stable disease (34.7%), and 16 with progressive disease (32.7%). Median time to disease progression was 3.3 months and median survival was 10.3 months. Grades 3/4 hematologic toxicities (% patients) consisted of: neutropenia (43.4), anemia (9.4), febrile neutropenia (7.5%) and thrombocytopenia (1.9). The most common grades 3 or 4 non-hematologic events were: dyspnea (15.1), fatigue (11.3), and pyrexia (9.4). One patient (1.9%) experienced grade 2 alopecia. CONCLUSION: This schedule of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine is tolerable and offered the advantage of not requiring a 90-min delay between the two drugs. Response rate, survival, time to disease progression, and toxicity were acceptable and similar to other NSCLC regimens.

Phase II study of pemetrexed in patients pretreated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine for advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and health outcomes of pemetrexed treatment in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with metastatic breast cancer, Karnofsky performance status > or = 70, and previous treatment with > or = 3 regimens containing anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine were eligible. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion was administered on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled, and 60 received concurrent folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements per protocol amendment to minimize possible pemetrexed-related toxicity. The median numbers of cycles delivered were 3 for vitamin-supplemented patients and 2 for non-vitamin-supplemented patients. Regardless of vitamin supplementation, the overall response rate was 8% (95% CI, 3%-16.6%), stable disease was exhibited in 36% of patients, median time to disease progression was 2.9 months, and median survival was 8.2 months. Improvements in patient-reported symptoms ranged from 16.2% for pain intensity to 32.1% for nausea. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic, with grade 4 neutropenia in 10% of patients and grade 3 toxicities consisting primarily of neutropenia (29%) and leukopenia (21%). There were no clear trends of the effect of supplementation on toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed has modest antitumor activity and is well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Further evaluation of this multitargeted antifolate in advanced breast cancer is warranted.

Gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II study of 28-day and 21-day schedules.

BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine/carboplatin is active and is widely used for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The optimum schedule for the administration of these agents is not currently known. This study compared 2 different combinations of carboplatin/gemcitabine to identify a schedule with a superior therapeutic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 28-day schedule used gemcitabine 1,100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin to an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 8. The 21-day schedule used gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin to an AUC of 5 on day 1. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB NSCLC (with malignant pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC were accrued. Grade 3/4 toxicities with the 28-day and 21-day schedules were anemia (4.8% and 6.9% of cycles, respectively), neutropenia (9.1% and 10.7% of cycles, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (8% and 14.4% of cycles, respectively). Thirty-four patients (13.2%) received blood transfusions with the 28-day regimen, as did 43 (20%) with the 21-day regimen, and no bleeding episodes occurred. Overall response rates were 22.8% with the 28-day schedule and 32.6% with the 21-day schedule (P=0.0338). Median survival and 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 9.8 months, 38.6%, and 15.7%, respectively, with the 28-day schedule and 12 months, 49.1%, and 15.8%, respectively, with the 21-day schedule (P=0.5098). CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine/carboplatin demonstrated efficacy comparable to other platinum agent doublets. Either schedule can be recommended, as differences in survival between groups were not significant.

Open-label study of pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma: outcomes of an expanded access program.

BACKGROUND: To date, few large studies have been reported of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma, and treatment of this disease has been largely extrapolated from the treatment of pleural disease. Hence, it was considered important to study and report on this specific patient population. Before the regulatory approval of pemetrexed, an expanded access program (EAP) provided access to eligible patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 alone or in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 once every 21 days for > or = 6 cycles. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were compiled in a pharmacovigilance database, which included all patients in the EAP with pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. From June 12, 2002 to February 18, 2004, 1056 patients with malignant mesothelioma were enrolled and received > or = 1 dose of treatment at 462 sites in the United States. Of these patients, 98 (9.3%) had peritoneal mesothelioma (57 previously treated, 38 chemotherapy-naive, and 3 with missing data). RESULTS: Response data were available for 73 patients (43 previously treated, 28 chemotherapy-naive, and 2 not classified), indicating response rates of 23.3% for previously treated patients (0 complete responses [CRs], 10 partial responses [PRs], 21 cases of stable disease [SDs], 12 cases of progressive disease [PDs]) and 25% for chemotherapy-naive patients (3 CRs, 4 PRs, 12 SDs, and 9 PDs). Median survival was 13.1 months for previously treated patients and has not been reached for chemotherapy-naive patients. The most commonly reported SAEs for the total EAP were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), and vomiting (4.9%). CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed with or without cisplatin had a favorable safety profile, and the disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 71.2% in the subset of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma indicated activity in this patient population.

Knowledge of antiretroviral regimen dosing and adherence: a longitudinal study.

In a cohort of 128 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients, we found that patients' knowledge of antiretroviral dosing was suboptimal at regimen initiation but improved with time. Poor medication knowledge 8 weeks after regimen initiation was associated with lower adherence and with a lower level of literacy in a multivariate model (P=.03). Because knowledge deficits are common after antiretroviral regimen initiation, clinicians should assess patients' understanding of medication dosing soon after regimen initiation or change.

Linking hospital discharge and death records--accuracy and sources of bias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and apply an automated linkage algorithm to 10 years of California hospitalization discharge abstracts and death records (1990 to 1999), evaluate linkage accuracy, and identify sources of bias. METHODS: Among the 1,858,458 acute hospital discharge records with unique social security numbers (SSNs) from 1 representative year of discharge data (1997), which had at least 2 years of follow-up, 66,410 of 69,757 deaths occurring in the hospital (95%) and 66,998 of 1,788,701 of individuals discharged alive (3.7%) linked to death records. Linkage sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 0.9524 and 0.9998 and positive and negative predictive values as 0.994 and 0.998 (corresponding to 400 incorrect death linkages among out-of-hospital death record linkages and 3,300 unidentified record pairs among unlinked live discharges). RESULTS: Based upon gold standard linkage rates, discharge records for those of age 1 year and older without SSNs may have 2,520 additional uncounted posthospitalization deaths at 1 year after admission. Gold standard comparison for those with SSNs showed women, the elderly, and Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks had more unlinked hospital death records, although absolute differences were small. The concentration of unidentified linkages among discharge records of traditionally vulnerable populations may result in understating mortality rates and other estimates (i.e., events with competing hazard of death) for these populations if SSN is differentially related to a patient's disease severity and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Because identification of cases of out-of-hospital deaths has improved over the past decade, observed improvements in patient survival over this time are likely to be conservative.

A multi-institutional phase II trial of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate response and survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer treated with combination gemcitabine and paclitaxel administered on a biweekly schedule at doses of 3000 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2, respectively. Patients with adequate organ function and performance status were accrued through 7 institutions, stratified by prior therapy status, and treated as noted. Response was evaluated by 1979 bi-dimensional World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Of 55 eligible patients, 17 had a partial and 5 had a complete response rate for an overall response rate of 40% (27-54%). One complete response and one partial response were observed in the 6 previously treated patients. Overall median survival was 11.8 months (11.9 months in the chemonaive cohort). Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in 56%, but only 4 serious infections were observed. We conclude that because of a lower than expected complete response rate, even when corrected for prognostic groupings, this regimen is not recommended for routine use in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Insufficient patients with poor renal function or prior therapy were accrued to reach conclusions regarding its utility in these subgroups.

Denosumab and bone metastasis-free survival in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: exploratory analyses by baseline prostate-specific antigen doubling time.

PURPOSE: Denosumab, an anti-RANK ligand monoclonal antibody, significantly increases bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .028) and delays time to first bone metastasis in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 8.0 ng/mL and/or PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 10.0 months. To identify men at greatest risk for bone metastasis or death, we evaluated relationships between PSA and PSADT with BMFS in the placebo group and the efficacy and safety of denosumab in men with PSADT ≤ 10, ≤ 6, and ≤ 4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,432 men with nonmetastatic CRPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or placebo. Enrollment began February 2006; primary analysis cutoff was July 2010, when approximately 660 men were anticipated to have developed bone metastases or died. RESULTS: In the placebo group, shorter BMFS was observed as PSADT decreased below 8 months. In analyses by shorter baseline PSADT, denosumab consistently increased BMFS by a median of 6.0, 7.2, and 7.5 months among men with PSADT ≤ 10 (HR, 0.84; P = .042), ≤ 6 (HR, 0.77; P = .006), and ≤ 4 months (HR, 0.71; P = .004), respectively. Denosumab also consistently increased time to bone metastasis by PSADT subset. No difference in survival was observed between treatment groups for the overall study population or PSADT subsets. CONCLUSION: Patients with shorter PSADT are at greater risk for bone metastasis or death. Denosumab consistently improves BMFS in men with shorter PSADT and seems to have the greatest treatment effects in men at high risk for progression.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine-containing regimens in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection alone remains suboptimal for patients with early-stage (I or II) non-small cell lung cancer. Two similar randomized phase II trials were conducted to define an active preoperative regimen in this disease state. METHODS: In the first study, patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 (GC) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5.5 on day 1 (GCb). In the second trial, patients received the same regimen of GCb or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1 (GP). Cycles were repeated every 21 days for three cycles. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: Eighty-seven eligible patients were randomized (GC n = 12, GP n = 35, and GCb n = 40), and 71 (82%) underwent surgery after chemotherapy. The confirmed pCR rate was 2.3% (2 of 87, 95% confidence interval 0.3-8.1). Clinical response rate was 28.7%, complete resection rate was 91.5% (65 of 71 patients), and perioperative mortality rate was 2.8%. As of October 2006, median survival for all patients was 45 months (65.5% censored), with 87.2% alive at 1 year and 69.8% alive at 2 years. DISCUSSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine was feasible and well tolerated, and outcomes were similar to other reports of this treatment strategy. However, no regimen achieved the predefined pCR rate that would be sufficient to warrant further evaluation in the phase III setting. This trial design provides an efficient way of providing a rationale for choosing or rejecting regimens of potential value.

Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed combined with either cisplatin or carboplatin in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Given the activity and tolerability of pemetrexed/platinum combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer, and the success of novel therapeutic strategies employed in recent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) trials, a randomized phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the use of cisplatin or carboplatin plus pemetrexed in previously untreated ES-SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or pemetrexed plus carboplatin area under the concentration curve 5. Treatment was administered once every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. RESULTS: Between December 19, 2002, and May 17, 2004, 78 patients were enrolled onto this multicenter trial. Median age was 63 years (range, 46 to 82 years) for cisplatin/pemetrexed and 66 years (range, 47 to 75 years) for carboplatin/pemetrexed. Median survival time (MST) for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 7.6 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 33.4% and a response rate of 35% (95% CI, 20.6% to 51.7%). The MST for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 10.4 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 39.0% and a response rate of 39.5% (95% CI, 24.0 to 56.6). Median time to progression for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 4.9 months and for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 4.5 months. Median dose-intensity (actual/planned dose) was 98.94% for cisplatin and 99.95% for pemetrexed in the cisplatin/pemetrexed group and 93.21% for carboplatin and 98.50% for pemetrexed in the carboplatin/pemetrexed group. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (15.8% v 20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (13.2% v 22.9%) in the cisplatin/pemetrexed and carboplatin/pemetrexed treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed/platinum doublets had activity and appeared to be well-tolerated in first-line ES-SCLC.

A randomized phase II trial using two different treatment schedules of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and carboplatin combination therapy is an active and tolerable regimen in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-eight- and 21-day regimens without day-15 administration of gemcitabine are common; however, it remains unclear which offers the optimal therapeutic index. METHODS: This trial evaluated two schedules of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin: gemcitabine (1100 mg/m on days 1 and 8) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 on day 8) every 28 days, or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 on day 1) every 21 days. Eligible patients in this trial had stage IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC with no prior chemotherapy. The primary objective was to evaluate progression-free survival, with secondary objectives of overall survival, response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomized and enrolled from October of 2000 to January of 2002 into this multi-institutional study (48 for the 28-day regimen and 52 for the 21-day regimen). Baseline demographics were well matched, and a majority of patients (85%) enrolled with stage IV disease. Median progression-free survival and response rates were 3.8 months and 22.9%, respectively, with the 28-day regimen, and 4.9 months and 40.4%, respectively, with the 21-day regimen. Median survival was 8.7 months with the 28-day regimen and 8.0 months for the 21-day regimen. One- and 2-year survival rates were 34.7% and 8.7%, respectively, with the 28-day regimen, and 36.5% and 16.8%, respectively, with the 21-day regimen. Differences in progression-free survival (log-rank statistic, p = 0.5786), response rate (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0859) and overall survival (log-rank statistic, p = 0.3568) were not statistically significant. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities occurred with a greater frequency in the 21-day regimen. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity (except nausea/vomiting with the 28-day regimen) was observed in more than 10% of patients in either treatment arm. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus carboplatin is active and well tolerated in advanced NSCLC. Both regimens may be considered for further study. Although the 21-day regimen appeared to be associated with preferable outcomes, differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant.

Pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin in previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcomes from a phase IIIB expanded access program.

BACKGROUND: In a randomized phase III trial, pemetrexed plus cisplatin was associated with improved survival compared with cisplatin alone for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, there are limited data available on the efficacy of these and other chemotherapy regimens in patients who have received previous systemic chemotherapy. To gather additional efficacy and safety data of pemetrexed/cisplatin and pemetrexed alone in previously treated patients, we examined patients treated on the Eli Lilly and Company expanded access program (EAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with malignant mesothelioma were enrolled in this trial. Of 1056 patients receiving at least one dose of the study drug, 187 (17.7%) were previously treated patients with MPM. Patients were treated every 21 days with pemetrexed 500 mg/m alone (n = 91) or in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m (n = 96) for a maximum of six cycles. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation and steroid prophylaxis. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by investigators and compiled in a pharmaco-vigilance database for all patients enrolled in the EAP. RESULTS: Median age of the previously treated pleural mesothelioma subset was 66 years (range, 27-87 years). Based on 153 evaluable patients (a subset of the larger intent-to-treat population of 187), the overall response rate was 32.5% for pemetrexed and cisplatin and 5.5% for pemetrexed alone. The disease control rate (response rate + stable disease) was 68.7% for pemetrexed and cisplatin and 46.6% for pemetrexed alone. Median survival was 7.6 months for pemetrexed plus cisplatin (67% censored) and 4.1 months for pemetrexed alone (55% censored). The most commonly reported serious adverse events in the overall EAP irrespective of causality were dehydration (7.2%), nausea (5.2%), vomiting (4.9%), dyspnea (3.8%), and pulmonary embolism (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this EAP study suggest that patients with previously treated MPM can benefit from treatment with pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin. The treatment is associated with acceptable toxicity.