A phase 3 trial of armodafinil for the treatment of cancer-related fatigue for patients with multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a common problem among multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Armodafinil is a drug known to promote wakefulness, which is related to modafinil, a compound that improves fatigue in some cancer patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents. We investigated whether armodafinil could reduce cancer-related fatigue in MM patients. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of armodafinil in MM patients with evidence of moderate fatigue. Patients were randomized to one of two arms: treatment-only, with armodafinil given at 150 mg/daily for 56 days, or placebo-first, with placebo given on days 1-28, followed by armodafinil administered at 150 mg daily on days 29-56. Fatigue was measured on days 1 (pre-dose: baseline), 15, 28, 43, and 56 using seven separate assessments, including four patient-reported outcomes of fatigue and related quality of life measures, as well as three objective measures of cognitive function. RESULTS: Overall toxicities were similar between treatment groups. No significant differences were observed between the placebo-first and the treatment-only arms after 28 days. Treatment with armodafinil for 28 additional days did not produce responses. Both placebo-first and treatment-only patients showed similar significant improvements in three patient-reported measures and one objective task at day 28 compared to baseline. Placebo-first patients improved on eight additional measures (one patient-reported measure, six subscales, and one objective task), suggesting a strong placebo effect in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation and treatment of cancer-related fatigue continues to be challenging; a clear definition of this symptom and better assessment tools are needed.

A phase 1/2 study of oral panobinostat combined with melphalan for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown synergistic preclinical anti-myeloma activity when combined with other agents, recently exhibiting synergy with the alkylating agent melphalan (Sanchez et al., Leuk Res 35(3):373-379, 2011). This phase 1/2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of panobinostat in combination with melphalan for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. There were four different trial treatment schedules due to tolerability issues, with the final treatment schedule (treatment schedule D) consisting of panobinostat (15 or 20 mg) and melphalan (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg), both administered on days 1, 3, and 5 of a 28-day cycle. A total of 40 patients were enrolled; 3 in treatment schedule A, 9 in schedule B, 7 in schedule C, and finally 21 schedule D. Patients had been treated with a median of four regimens (range, 1-16) and two prior bortezomib-containing regimens (range, 0-9). Maximum-tolerated dose was established at 20 mg panobinostat and 0.05 mg/kg melphalan in treatment schedule D. Overall, 3 patients (7.5 %) achieved ≥partial response (two very good PRs and one PR) while 23 exhibited stable disease and 14 showed progressive disease. All three responders were enrolled in cohort 2 of treatment schedule B (panobinostat 20 mg thrice weekly continuously with melphalan 0.05 mg/kg on days 1, 3, and 5). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were common, with 30.8 and 23.1 % of patients exhibiting ≥grade 3, respectively. Panobinostat + melphalan appears to have tolerability issues in a dosing regimen capable of producing a response. Care must be taken to balance tolerability and efficacy with this combination.

Phase I/II trial assessing bendamustine plus bortezomib combination therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Bendamustine, active in multiple myeloma (MM), is a bifunctional mechlorethamine derivative with alkylating properties. Bortezomib, approved to treat MM, is effective in combination with alkylators. The tolerability and efficacy of bendamustine plus bortezomib in relapsed/refractory MM was assessed in an open-label, dose-escalating, phase I/II study. Patients aged ≥18 years received intravenous bendamustine 50, 70, or 90 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 4) plus bortezomib 1·0 mg/m(2) (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) for up to eight 28-day cycles. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed after cycle 1; bendamustine 90 mg/m(2) plus bortezomib 1·0 mg/m(2) was designated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were leucopenia (58%), neutropenia (50%), lymphopenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (30%). Primary efficacy measure was overall response rate (ORR), which was the combined complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), and minimal response (MR). ORR was 48% (one CR, two VGPR, nine PR, and seven MR) for all 40 enrolled patients, 52% (16/31) at the MTD (90 mg/m(2) ), and 42% and 46% for prior use of bortezomib (n = 31) or alkylators (n = 28) respectively. Bendamustine plus bortezomib was well tolerated with promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated population.

Serum B-cell maturation antigen is elevated in multiple myeloma and correlates with disease status and survival.

Although TNFRSF17 (also designated as B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)) is expressed on tumour cells in B-cell malignancies, it has not been found in serum. The present study found that BCMA concentrations were higher in the supernatants of cultured bone marrow mononuclear cells from multiple myeloma (MM) patients than in healthy subjects. Serum BCMA levels were measured in samples from MM patients (n = 209), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) individuals (n = 23) and age-matched controls (n = 40). BCMA was detected in the serum of untreated MM patients (n = 50) and levels were higher than in MGUS patients (P = 0·0157) and healthy subjects (P < 0·0001). Serum BCMA levels were higher among patients with progressive disease (n = 80) compared to those with responsive disease (n = 79; P = 0·0038). Among all MM patients, overall survival was shorter among patients whose serum BCMA levels were above the median (P = 0·001). We also demonstrated that sera from mice with human MM xenografts contained human BCMA, and levels correlated with the change in tumour volume in response to melphalan or cyclophosphamide with bortezomib. These results suggest that serum BCMA levels may be a new biomarker for monitoring disease status and overall survival of MM patients.

A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVD) is effective and well tolerated for previously untreated multiple myeloma patients.

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), bortezomib and dexamethasone has shown efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our earlier retrospective study suggested that modification of the doses, schedules and route of administration of these drugs appears to reduce toxicity without compromising anti-MM activity. As a result, we evaluated this modified drug combination in the frontline setting in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Thirty-five previously untreated MM patients were enrolled. Dexamethasone IV 40 mg, bortezomib 1 mg/m(2) and PLD 5 mg/m(2) were administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 4-week cycle. Patients were treated to their maximum response plus two additional cycles. The treatment regimen was discontinued after a maximum of eight cycles. Our modified schedule and dosing regimen achieved a high overall response rate of 86%, while showing a marked decrease in the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and myelosuppression compared to the standard dosing on a 3-week cycle using these drugs. This modified regimen of dexamethasone, bortezomib and PLD shows improved tolerability and safety while maintaining a high response rate when compared to standard treatment with these agents in the frontline setting.

A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated synergy between bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients compared to bortezomib as a single agent. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more frequent low-dose schedule of PLD, bortezomib, and intravenous dexamethasone (DVD) for patients with R/R MM, many of whom were previously treated with bortezomib. Twenty-eight patients with R/R MM were treated, and 23 (83%) had been previously treated with ≥ 1 bortezomib-containing regimen. Treatment consisted of dexamethasone 40 mg intravenously, bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2), and PLD 5.0 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 28-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles. Patients ranged from 33 to 81 years of age (median, 67) and had received 1-14 prior therapies (median, 5). At baseline, ten, nine, and nine patients were in stages I, II, and III, respectively, as defined by the International Staging System, and eight (29%) patients had elevated serum creatinine levels. The overall response rate was 61%, which included one (4%) complete response, three (11%) very good partial responses, eight (29%) partial responses, and five (18%) minimal responses. Of the 23 patients who had previously received bortezomib, 12 (52%) responded. The regimen was well tolerated with only six patients (21%) who showed worsening of their baseline peripheral neuropathy (PN). One patient discontinued this regimen due to an adverse event (grade II PN). DVD appears to represent a well-tolerated regimen with a high response rate for the treatment of R/R MM patients.

Prognostic factors and jaw and renal complications among multiple myeloma patients treated with zoledronic acid.

Few studies have evaluated prognostic factors among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) since new therapies have become available. Monthly zoledronic acid (ZOL) has been incorporated into many treatment regimens to reduce skeletal-related events (SREs), but outcomes among patients receiving this bisphosphonate have not been well-defined. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine baseline and on-treatment prognostic factors in these patients. Data were collected from the date of diagnosis on 300 consecutive MM patients treated with ZOL. Median duration of ZOL was 18 months (range 1-121 months). The skeletal morbidity rate was 0.116 events per patient year. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 69%. Risk factors for shortened OS included SREs, increased serum creatinine, and International Staging System (ISS) Stage II or III. Thirty-four (11%) patients showed worsening renal function. In 28 of these patients, ZOL was discontinued and restarted in half of these patients following a brief delay. Only 5 of the 34 patients showed worsening of their renal function. Fourteen patients (4.7%) developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). All patients with ONJ are in remission or with stable disease except one patient who died of a myocardial infarction while in remission. Only two patients showed some worsening of ONJ despite of ongoing monthly ZOL. Overall, these results suggest that skeletal complications are an important prognostic factor for MM. Although ONJ and renal deterioration may infrequently occur with ZOL, most patients do not experience worsening of these conditions with ongoing treatment with this bisphosphonate.

Alirocumab treatment and neurocognitive function according to the CANTAB scale in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Trials of the fully human monoclonal antibody proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9) alirocumab in hypercholesterolemia demonstrated substantial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering, reduction in cardiovascular (CV) events and outcomes, and a generally acceptable safety and tolerability profile. The impact of maintaining low LDL-C levels on higher order brain function is unclear, with reports of neurocognitive disorders with other lipid-lowering therapies. METHODS: Patients (n = 2176) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or non-FH, at high or very-high CV risk despite maximally tolerated statin therapy, randomly received subcutaneous alirocumab 75/150 mg or placebo every 2 weeks in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary outcome was prospectively evaluated every 24 weeks over 96 weeks by Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). RESULTS: Among 2086 patients with CANTAB cognitive domain Spatial Working Memory Strategy (SWMS) assessments, change from baseline to Week 96 in SWMS z-score (primary outcome) achieved noninferiority between alirocumab and placebo (least squares [LS] mean change at Week 96, -0.180 vs -0.200; LS mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval]: -0.020 [-0.094 to 0.055], p = 0.6055). Exploratory outcome measures, which further assessed neurocognitive function in the CANTAB domains, did not differ significantly over 96 weeks and achieved nominal noninferiority between treatment groups. Alirocumab resulted in nominally significant reductions in LDL-C and other lipid parameters, and was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Confirming previous PCSK9 inhibitor data, alirocumab showed no effect on neurocognitive function over 96 weeks' treatment, substantially reduced LDL-C and was generally well tolerated in patients with HeFH or non-FH at high or very-high CV risk.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement.

On February 25, 2009, a panel of international experts on plasma cell dyscrasia and skeletal disease met to discuss monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). This non-malignant B-cell disorder is the most common plasma cell dyscrasia and is associated with an increased risk of developing serious B-cell disorders. Individuals with MGUS also have an increased risk of osteoporosis and osteopenia associated with an increased likelihood of developing fractures especially in the vertebral column, peripheral neuropathy and thromboembolic events. The goal of the meeting was to develop a consensus statement regarding the appropriate tests to screen, evaluate and follow-up patients with MGUS. The panel also addressed the identification and treatment of MGUS-related skeletal problems, thromboembolic events and neurological complications. The following consensus statement outlines the conclusions and marks the first time that a consensus statement for the screening and treatment of MGUS has been clearly stated.

A phase I study of samarium lexidronam/bortezomib combination therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: This open-label, phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of Samariam 153 (153Sm)-lexidronam/bortezomib combination therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were enrolled in six cohorts and given bortezomib (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 153Sm-lexidronam (0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mCi/kg) on day 3 of a 56-day cycle (maximum of four cycles). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of the 153Sm-lexidronam/bortezomib regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Median values for age, time since diagnosis, and number of prior treatments were 63 years, 29 months, and three regimens, respectively. The most common toxicities were hematologic; during the first cycle, median neutrophil and platelet nadirs were 1,000/mm3 and 98,500/mm3, respectively, and observed generally 3 to 4 weeks post-treatment. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 12.5% and 8.3%, respectively, during treatment cycle 1. Dose-limiting toxicity, reached in cohort 6 as a result of hematologic toxicity, defined the maximum tolerated dose as 0.5 mCi/kg 153Sm-lexidronam in combination with 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib. The maximum tolerated dose for 153Sm-lexidronam in combination with the 1.0 mg/m2 bortezomib was not reached. No nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicities were observed; both the incidence and the severity of peripheral neuropathy were low. Responses occurred in 5 (21%) patients, including 3 (12.5%) complete and 2 (8.3%) minimal responses. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib combined with 153Sm-lexidronam appears to be a well-tolerated regimen, which showed clinical activity in this phase I trial for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Bortezomib, ascorbic acid and melphalan (BAM) therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an effective and well-tolerated frontline regimen.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a single-arm, multicentre phase 2 study to evaluate bortezomib, ascorbic acid and melphalan (BAM) for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Induction consisted of up to eight 28-d cycles of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, plus oral ascorbic acid 1 g and oral melphalan 0.1 mg/kg on days 1-4, followed by maintenance bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) every 2 wk until progression. RESULTS: Among 35 patients enrolled (median age 70 yr), responses occurred in 23/31 evaluable patients (74%) including five (16%) complete, three (10%) very good partial, six (19%) partial and nine (29%) minimal responses. Six patients (19%) had stable disease. Thus, disease control was achieved in 29 (94%) patients. Median times to first and best responses were 2 and 3 months (ranges 1-5 and 1-7), respectively. Median time to progression was 19 months and median overall survival has not been reached (range 2-23+ months). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 17 and 5 patients, respectively; the most common were neutropenia, neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: BAM is an efficacious, well-tolerated and steroid- and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-free frontline treatment regimen for MM patients.

Zoledronic acid markedly improves bone mineral density for patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and bone loss.

PURPOSE: Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have increased rates of bone resorption, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and risk of fractures. This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid for patients with MGUS and enhanced bone loss. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this phase II open-label study, 54 patients with MGUS and osteopenia or osteoporosis were administered zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v. at 0, 6, and 12 months. The primary efficacy end point was bone mineral density, assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan in the lumbar (L)-spine done at screening and at 13 months (1 month after the final zoledronic acid infusion). RESULTS: At study end for all patients (N = 54), L-spine T-scores improved by a median of +0.27 (range, -0.38 to +3.91), corresponding to a median increase in bone mineral density of +15.0% (range, -18.0% to +1,140.0%; P < 0.0001). Hip T-scores improved by a median of +0.10 (range, -2.40 to +2.03), corresponding to a median increase of +6.0% (range, -350.0% to +165.0%). During the study, no new fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw, or significant renal adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid administered i.v. at a dosage of 4 mg every 6 months for three doses total was well-tolerated and substantially improved bone mineral density for patients with MGUS and bone loss. Zoledronic acid may be effective for the prevention of new fractures in this high-risk population.

Safety and efficacy of bortezomib and melphalan combination in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated results of a phase 1/2 study after longer follow-up.

Bortezomib synergizes with melphalan in preclinical and early clinical studies. Updated data from our phase 1/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of bortezomib plus melphalan in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) are presented. Bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, or 1.3 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and oral melphalan (0.025-0.25 mg/kg) on days 1-4 of a 28-day cycle were administered. Hematologic toxicities defined the maximum tolerated dose as bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and melphalan 0.10 mg/kg. Because dose-limiting toxicities were attributed to the more myelosuppressive melphalan, cohorts 9 and 10 with higher bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)) and lower melphalan (0.025 and 0.10 mg/kg) doses were added. Responses occurred in 32/46 (70%) evaluable patients: two complete (4%), five near-complete (11%), 16 partial (35%), and nine minimal (20%). Complete and near-complete responses were observed only with higher bortezomib doses. Response rates were similar in patients with prior melphalan or bortezomib. Median progression-free survival was 9 months (range, 1-24), and overall survival was 32 months (range, 1-54). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (31%/0%), thrombocytopenia (25%/2%), and anemia (13%/0%). Grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome was reported in one patient. Fewer grade 3/4 hematologic AEs were reported in cohorts 9 and 10 than in cohorts receiving lower bortezomib and higher melphalan doses. In conclusion, bortezomib plus melphalan is a steroid- and immunomodulatory drug-free regimen that may provide a treatment alternative for elderly patients and patients with significant comorbidity.

Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, a battery-powered bone marrow biopsy system was developed and cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to allow health care providers to access the bone marrow space quickly and efficiently. A multicenter randomized clinical trial was designed for adult patients to determine if the powered device had advantages over traditional manually-inserted needles in regard to length of procedure, patient pain, complications, user satisfaction, and pathological analysis of the specimens. METHODS: Adult patients requiring marrow sampling procedures were randomized for a Manual or Powered device. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were captured immediately following the procedure and 1 and 7 days later. Procedure time was measured and core specimens were submitted to pathology for grading. RESULTS: Ten sites enrolled 102 patients into the study (Powered, n = 52; Manual, n = 50). Mean VAS scores for overall procedural pain were not significantly different between the arms (3.8 ± 2.8 for Powered, 3.5 ± 2.3 for Manual [p = 0.623]). A day later, more patients who underwent the Powered procedure were pain-free (67%) than those patients in the Manual group (33%; p = 0.003). One week later, there was no difference (83% for Powered patients; 76% for Manual patients.) Mean procedure time was 102.1 ± 86.4 seconds for the Powered group and 203.1 ± 149.5 seconds for the Manual group (p < 0.001). Pathology assessment was similar in specimen quality, but there was a significant difference in the specimen volume between the devices (Powered: 36.8 ± 21.2 mm3; Manual: 20.4 ± 9.0 mm3; p = 0.039). Two non-serious complications were experienced during Powered procedures (4%); but none during Manual procedures (p = 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this first trial provide evidence that the Powered device delivers larger-volume bone marrow specimens for pathology evaluation. In addition, bone marrow specimens were secured more rapidly and subjects experienced less intermediate term pain when the Powered device was employed. Further study is needed to determine if clinicians more experienced with the Powered device will be able to use it in a manner that significantly reduces needle insertion pain; and to compare a larger sample of pathology specimens obtained using the Powered device to those obtained using traditional manual biopsy needles.

A retrospective study to evaluate the work-up and follow-up of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell proliferative disorder that transforms into multiple myeloma and other serious B-cell disorders at an approximate rate of 1% per year; these patients are also at increased risk for fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of 100 patients from seven community health clinics to gain a better understanding of the work-up, follow-up, and treatment of these patients. RESULTS: MGUS patients appear to undergo inadequate work-up, follow-up, and treatment in the community setting. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should adhere to recently established guidelines to ensure that MGUS patients receive optimal care for this condition.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: why identification of these patients and assessment of their skeletons is important.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell disorder characterized by the presence of a serum monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein) at

New drugs in multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in the understanding of multiple myeloma pathogenesis have led to the development of innovative targeted therapies and improved management of this aggressive hematological neoplasia. This review will focus on the clinical trials that have reinforced the use of these new agents. Also, we will briefly take a look at the newer drugs making their way out of the laboratory and into early phase studies. RECENT FINDINGS: During the past decade new multiple myeloma therapies featuring bortezomib and lenalidomide have come to light, whereas known agents such as thalidomide and arsenic trioxide have been reintroduced as key factors in multiple myeloma management. These new agents and their combinations have shown increased response rates and have added more options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has become resistant to conventional therapy. With these drug therapies has come a more targeted approach to treatment enabling not only improved antimyeloma efficacy but also the use of decreased dosing enhancing the safety and tolerability of these regimens. Newer agents including the histone deacetylase, hsp90, mammalian target of rapamycin and Akt inhibitors are showing promise preclinically and are now being assessed in phase I/II trials. SUMMARY: This new antimultiple myeloma arsenal has shown its worth in both the relapsed/refractory and frontline setting and provides valuable options for patients with this debilitating disease.