Apatinib Plus Toripalimab (Anti-PD1 Therapy) as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the activity of apatinib plus toripalimab in the second line for patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer (GC/EGJC). METHODS: In this open-label, phase II, randomized trial, patients with advanced GC/EGJC who progressed after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and received 250 mg apatinib per day plus 240 mg toripalimab on day 1 per 3 weeks (arm A) or physician's choice of chemotherapy (PC, arm B). The primary endpoint of this study was the 1-year survival rate. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received apatinib plus toripalimab while 26 were enrolled in arm B. The 1-year survival rates of the 2 groups were 43.3% and 42.3%, respectively (P = .903). The PFS was 2.77 versus 2.33 months (P = .660). The OS was 8.30 versus 9.88 months (P = .539). An objective response was reported in 20.0% of patients in arm A compared to 26.9% in arm B (P = .368), respectively. A total of 6 (24.0%) patients experienced adverse events of grade ≥ 3 in arm A, while 9 (34.6%) patients suffered from adverse events of grade ≥ 3 in arm B. No drug-related deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Toripalimab plus apatinib treatment in second-line therapy of advanced GC/EGJC showed manageable toxicity but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to PC treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04190745).

Zanidatamab for HER2-amplified, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (HERIZON-BTC-01): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2b study.

BACKGROUND: HER2 is overexpressed or amplified in a subset of biliary tract cancer. Zanidatamab, a bispecific antibody targeting two distinct HER2 epitopes, exhibited tolerability and preliminary anti-tumour activity in HER2-expressing or HER2 (also known as ERBB2)-amplified treatment-refractory biliary tract cancer. METHODS: HERIZON-BTC-01 is a global, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2b trial of zanidatamab in patients with HER2-amplified, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with disease progression on previous gemcitabine-based therapy, recruited at 32 clinical trial sites in nine countries in North America, South America, Asia, and Europe. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with HER2-amplified biliary tract cancer confirmed by in-situ hybridisation per central testing, at least one measurable target lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were assigned into cohorts based on HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score: cohort 1 (IHC 2+ or 3+; HER2-positive) and cohort 2 (IHC 0 or 1+). Patients received zanidatamab 20 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate in cohort 1 as assessed by independent central review. Anti-tumour activity and safety were assessed in all participants who received any dose of zanidatamab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04466891, is ongoing, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Sept 15, 2020, and March 16, 2022, 87 patients were enrolled in HERIZON-BTC-01: 80 in cohort 1 (45 [56%] were female and 35 [44%] were male; 52 [65%] were Asian; median age was 64 years [IQR 58-70]) and seven in cohort 2 (five [71%] were male and two [29%] were female; five [71%] were Asian; median age was 62 years [IQR 58-77]). At the time of the data cutoff (Oct 10, 2022), 18 (21%) patients (17 in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2) were continuing to receive zanidatamab; 69 (79%) discontinued treatment (radiographic progression in 64 [74%] patients). The median duration of follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 9·4-17·2). Confirmed objective responses by independent central review were observed in 33 patients in cohort 1 (41·3% [95% CI 30·4-52·8]). 16 (18%) patients had grade 3 treatment-related adverse events; the most common were diarrhoea (four [5%] patients) and decreased ejection fraction (three [3%] patients). There were no grade 4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Zanidatamab demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in patients with treatment-refractory, HER2-positive biliary tract cancer. These results support the potential of zanidatamab as a future treatment option in HER2-positive biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: Zymeworks, Jazz, and BeiGene.

Dual targeted therapy with pyrotinib and trastuzumab for HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer: A phase 2 trial.

This trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In this single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial patients with HER2-positive recurrent/metastatic CRC were enrolled and received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once a day plus intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints. From December 2019 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients were enrolled and 18 of them were evaluable for response. All patients were B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) wild type. Four patients achieved partial response, with an ORR of 22.2% (4/18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-47.6) and DCR of 61.1% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8-82.7), while the ORR and DCR were 33.3% (4/12, 95% CI 13.8-60.9) and 83.3% (10/12, 95% CI 51.6-97.9), respectively, in RAS wild-type patients. At the time of cut-off day, median follow-up was 10.7 months (range 3.8-13.8). The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8-4.3) in the overall population and 4.3 months (95% CI 3.2-8.5) in the RAS wild-type group. The most common adverse event of grade ≥3 was diarrhea (13/20, 65.0%). Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type HER2-positive advanced CRC.

Does resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS regimen) benefit for gastric cancer patients with single non-curable factor? a multicenter, prospective cohort study (Neo-REGATTA).

BACKGROUND: The Neo-REGATTA study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS regimen) followed by radical resection vs. chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor. METHODS: This cohort study prospectively enrolled advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor between November 2017 and June 2021. Patients without progression after four cycles of DOS were divided into resection group and chemotherapy group. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Effectiveness analysis was also performed by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were enrolled and 13 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression after 4 cycles of DOS. Afterwards, 35 and 25 participants were in the resection and chemotherapy groups, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 30.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 9.0 months, and 18.0 months for the chemotherapy group, but not reached in the resection group. After PSM, 19 matched participants were in each group, and the median PFS and OS were longer in resection group than that in chemotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events both in the resection group and chemotherapy groups were neutropenia (5.7%, 8.0%) and leukopenia (5.7%, 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection might provide survival benefit compared with continuous chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had a disease control after DOS, with a good safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03001726, 23/12/2016).

Bifunctional anti-PD-L1/TGF-ßRII agent SHR-1701 in advanced solid tumors: a dose-escalation, dose-expansion, and clinical-expansion phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Dual inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 and TGF-ß pathways is a rational therapeutic strategy for malignancies. SHR-1701 is a new bifunctional fusion protein composed of a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1 fused with the extracellular domain of TGF-ß receptor II. This first-in-human trial aimed to assess SHR-1701 in pretreated advanced solid tumors and find the population who could benefit from SHR-1701. METHODS: This was a dose-escalation, dose-expansion, and clinical-expansion phase 1 study. Dose escalation was initiated by accelerated titration (1 mg/kg q3w; intravenous infusion) and then switched to a 3+3 scheme (3, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg q3w and 30 mg/kg q2w), followed by dose expansion at 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg q3w and 30 mg/kg q2w. The primary endpoints of the dose-escalation and dose-expansion parts were the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. In the clinical-expansion part, selected tumors were enrolled to receive SHR-1701 at the recommended dose, with a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: In total, 171 patients were enrolled (dose-escalation: n=17; dose-expansion, n=33; clinical-expansion, n=121). In the dose-escalation part, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. SHR-1701 showed a linear dose-exposure relationship and the highest ORR at 30 mg/kg every 3 weeks, without obviously aggravated toxicities across doses in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion parts. Combined, 30 mg/kg every 3 weeks was determined as the recommended phase 2 dose. In the clinical-expansion part, SHR-1701 showed the most favorable efficacy in the gastric cancer cohort, with an ORR of 20.0% (7/35; 95% CI, 8.4-36.9) and a 12-month overall survival rate of 54.5% (95% CI, 29.5-73.9). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 37 of 171 patients (22%), mainly including increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (3%), anemia (3%), hyponatremia (3%), and rash (2%). Generally, patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 or pSMAD2 histochemical score ≥235 had numerically higher ORR. CONCLUSIONS: SHR-1701 showed an acceptable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in pretreated advanced solid tumors, especially in gastric cancer, establishing the foundation for further exploration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03710265.

Adjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with S-1 vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine after D2 gastrectomy in patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma: a phase III multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only treatment option for operable gastric cancer. The CLASSIC and ACTS-GC studies showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy is still very low. Whether adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) combined chemotherapy is more effective than the XELOX standard adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer has not been confirmed. METHODS: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase III clinical study. In this trial, 616 patients with locally advanced stage III gastric cancer that underwent curative D2 radical surgery and achieved R0 are planned to be included. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS) vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX). XELOX group: Patients assigned to the XELOX group received eight 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle plus intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. AS group: AS group received eight 3-week cycles of oral S-1 (80-120 mg) (< 1.25 m2, 40 mg; 1.25 to < 1.5 m2, 50 mg; and > 1.5 m2, 60 mg) twice daily on days 1-14 plus intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (3-year-DFS) defined as the time from randomisation to the time of recurrence of the original gastric cancer, development of a new gastric cancer, or death from any cause. The secondary endpoints were the overall survival, (defined as the time from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause) and safety (any adverse event). DISCUSSION: Compared with previous studies, this study includes nab-paclitaxel based on S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, which is expected to achieve better efficacy and lower toxicity than the standard treatment. This study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 in patients with stage III gastric cancer after D2 radical resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04135781 , on October 20th, 2019.

Immunological impact of chemotherapy on the tumor microenvironment in gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate alterations in pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) tumor-infiltrating immune cells and subsequent evaluation of the predictive and prognostic value of these changes in gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Fifty patients with GC underwent three cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX regimen)-NACT. Paired samples from tumor lesions before and after NACT were available for all patients participating in the study. Immunohistochemistry was performed for T cell subsets (CD3+ and CD8+ ) and macrophages (CD68+ and CD163+ ). RESULTS: After NACT, the average expression levels of CD3, CD8, CD68, and CD163 were significantly increased (p < .001). However, neither expression levels pre- nor post-chemotherapy correlated with treatment response. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that upregulation of CD8/CD3 levels (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.117; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.031-0.446; p = 0.002) and CD163 levels after chemotherapy (HR = 2.258; 95% CI = 1.047-4.867; p = 0.038) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy in GC is useful to induce CD3+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes as well as CD68+ and CD163+ macrophages in the tumor microenvironment in combination with its direct cytotoxic effects. These results indicate that chemotherapy may play a role in tumor immune microenvironment remodeling.

Surufatinib in advanced extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-ep): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of surufatinib (HMPL-012, sulfatinib) in patients with extrapancreatic NETs. METHODS: SANET-ep was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial undertaken at 24 hospitals across China. Patients (aged 18 years or older) with unresectable or metastatic, well differentiated, extrapancreatic NETs, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on no more than two types of previous systemic regimens were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomly assigned (2:1) using stratified block randomisation (block size 3) via an interactive web response system to receive oral surufatinib at 300 mg per day or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by tumour origin, pathological grade, and previous treatment. Patients, investigators, research staff and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to the surufatinib group was allowed for patients in the placebo group at disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. A preplanned interim analysis was done at 70% of predicted progression-free survival events. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02588170. Follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 9, 2015, and March 31, 2019, 198 patients were randomly assigned to surufatinib (n=129) or placebo (n=69). Median follow-up was 13·8 months (95% CI 11·1-16·7) in the surufatinib group and 16·6 months (9·2-not calculable) in the placebo group. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·2 months (95% CI 7·4-11·1) in the surufatinib group versus 3·8 months (3·7-5·7) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·33; 95% CI 0·22-0·50; p<0·0001). As the trial met the predefined criteria for early discontinuation of the study at the interim analysis, the study was terminated early, as recommended by the independent data monitoring committee. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were hypertension (47 [36%] of 129 patients in the surufatinib group vs nine [13%] of 68 patients in the placebo group) and proteinuria (25 [19%] vs zero). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 32 (25%) of 129 patients in the surufatinib group and nine (13%) of 68 patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients in the surufatinib group (disseminated intravascular coagulation and hepatic encephalopathy, liver injury, and death with unknown reason) and one patient in the placebo group (cachexia and respiratory failure). INTERPRETATION: Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients given surufatinib compared with patients given placebo, and surufatinib has a favourable benefit-to-risk profile in patients with progressive, advanced, well differentiated extrapancreatic NETs. Our results suggest that surufatinib might be a new treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma.

LEPR hypomethylation is significantly associated with gastric cancer in males.

BACKGROUND: Previous study has shown LEPR is a candidate gene of prediction and treatment of gastric cancer (GC). The purpose of this study was to test whether LEPR methylation could predict the risk of GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor tissues and 5-cm adjacent non-tumor tissues from 117 newly diagnosed and untreated GC patients were collected for the current methylation study. LEPR methylation levels were determined by quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP), and the methylation level of LEPR was described by the percentage of methylated reference (PMR). RESULTS: Our results showed that LEPR methylation levels were significantly lower in tumor tissues than those in adjacent non-tumor tissues (median PMR: 36.64% vs. 50.29%, P = 1E-4). In addition, LEPR methylation levels were found to be significantly associated with platelet (r = -0.198, P = .037). Further subgroup analysis showed that the association of LEPR promoter hypomethylation with GC was specific to males (males: P = 7E-5; females: P = .500). Notably, significant hypomethylation of LEPR promoter was found only in GC patients without recurrence (P = .002) but not in GC patients with recurrence (P = .146). The AUC of LEPR hypomethylation for identification of GC risk was 0.649 with a sensitivity of 67.5% and a specificity of 63.2%. In addition, the AUC of LEPR hypomethylation in males was 0.685 with a sensitivity of 68.4% and a specificity of 69.6%. CONCLUSION: LEPR hypomethylation can be used to predict the risk of GC in males. And it might also have the potential to predict the recurrence in GC patients.

GPX3 hypermethylation in gastric cancer and its prognostic value in patients aged over 60.

AIM: This study investigated the association between GPX3 methylation and gastric cancer (GC), and explored its prognostic value in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. MATERIALS & METHODS: The methylation levels of tumor and paracancerous tissues were detected by quantitative methylation-specific PCR method. RESULTS: GPX3 was hypermethylated in GC (p = 4E-4), and was specific for patients with lymphatic metastasis (+), tumor invasion depth >3 cm and patients with poor differentiation. Additionally, GPX3 hypermethylation predicts a tumor recurrence in patients aged >60 (p = 0.019). Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) further confirmed GPX3 hypermethylation (cg21504918: -0.08 vs -0.25, p = 0.001). Additionally, TCGA showed an inverse correlation between GPX3 methylation and expression (p = 7E-18, r = -0.427). Data analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database showed that 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine demethylating agent increased GPX3 expression (fold-change >2.19, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated GPX3 hypermethylation in GC, and predicted a shorter tumor recurrence time in patients aged >60.

Tumor clinicopathological characteristics and their prognostic value in mucinous colorectal carcinoma.

Aim: This study analyzed clinicopathological features of colorectal mucinous carcinoma and their prognostic values. Patients & method: This study enrolled 265 patients with mucinous colorectal cancer. Clinicopathological information and prognosis were reviewed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier method, log- rank test and COX proportional hazard regression models were used. Results: In postoperative mucinous carcinoma patients (median age 56, 119 [44.9%] female), advanced tumor stage (odds ratio [OR]: 2.378; 95% CI: 1.512-3.741; p = 0.0002), poor differentiation (OR: 1.896; CI: 1.217-2.955; p = 0.0047) and right-sided tumors (OR: 2.421; CI: 1.145-5.102; p = 0.0206) were associated with shorter overall survival. Appendiceal/ileocecal cecal tumors were not different for prognosis. Conclusion: Mucinous colorectal carcinoma exhibits distinct tumor characteristics. Poor differentiation, advanced stage at presentation and the right side serve as negative prognostic factors.

Significant association of PRMT6 hypomethylation with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Protein arginine N-methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) was deemed to be indispensable in the variety of biological processes. Upregulated PRMT6 was found in various human diseases including cancer. Herein, we investigated the performance of PRMT6 methylation in the diagnosis for CRC. METHODS: A quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP) method was used to measure PRMT6 promoter methylation. The percentage of methylated reference (PMR) was applied to represent gene methylation level. RESULTS: Our data indicated that PRMT6 promoter methylation levels were significantly lower in CRC tissues than those in paired nontumor tissues (median PMR: 36.93% vs 63.12%, P = 1E-6) and normal intestinal tissues (median PMR: 36.93% vs 506.55%, P = 8E-12). We further examined the potential role of PRMT6 hypomethylation by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Our results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.644 (95% CI = 0.596-0.733) between CRC tissues and paired nontumor tissues, 0.958 (95% CI = 0.919-0.998) between CRC tissues and normal intestinal tissues, and 0.899 (95% CI = 0.825-0.972) between paired nontumor tissues and normal intestinal tissues. CONCLUSION: Our study firstly indicated that the hypomethylation of PRMT6 promoter could be a novel diagnostic biomarker for CRC.

Efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in Chinese patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This phase II bridging study assessed the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial [MPACT] regimen) in Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). METHODS: This 3-part sequential study evaluated nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Part 1 evaluated safety. Part 2 evaluated efficacy using Simon's optimal 2-stage design: if >2 responses were observed in Stage 1 (n = 28), 54 additional patients would be enrolled in Stage 2. If >9 responses were observed, the study was complete. Otherwise, nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine would be compared with gemcitabine alone in Part 3. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were treated. The prespecified primary endpoint was met: the independently assessed ORR in Stages 1 + 2 was 35% (95% CI, 24.8-46.2); therefore, Part 3 was not initiated. The median DOR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.01-8.94). The median OS and progression-free survival were 9.2 (95% CI, 7.6-11.1) and 5.5 (95% CI, 5.29-7.16) months, respectively. The 12-month OS rate was 30%. In an updated analysis, the median OS was 9.3 months and the 12-month OS rate was 32%. Longer OS was observed in patients with baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≤ 5 vs > 5. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were leukopenia (35%), neutropenia (34%), anemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and fatigue (13%). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 7% of patients (no grade 4 reported). CONCLUSIONS: The MPACT regimen of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine is efficacious in Chinese patients with MPC. No new safety signals were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02135822 , May 8, 2014.

Prognostic value of p53 for colorectal cancer after surgical resection of pulmonary metastases.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastases occur in up to 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Many studies have reported that pulmonary metastasectomy might increase 5-year survival of these patients. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer and to explore the prognostic value of p53 overexpression and other factors. METHODS: Between July 2002 and December 2013, the clinicopathological data of 88 patients with colorectal carcinoma who underwent pulmonary metastases resection were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Clinical, biochemical and imaging, and operative data, and expression of p53 were retrospectively collected. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed on paraffin-embedded 5-µm sections using mouse anti-human tumor protein p53 monoclonal antibody (DO-7, Dako, Denmark). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from resection of pulmonary metastases to death. The prognostic effect of each variable on survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. For the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, the Cox regression model was used. RESULTS: There were 58 men and 30 women in this study, and their median age was 55 (range 31 to 85). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was performed in 59 cases (78%), and 29 patients (19%) underwent thoracotomy. Lung wedge resection and pulmonary lobectomy were performed in 52 (59.1%) and 36 (40.9%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up duration of 44 months, the cumulative 5-year survival was 45.4%, and the median overall survival was 57.8 months. The expression of p53 significantly influenced survival. In patients with p53 protein overexpression, we observed a median OS of 46.1 months, whereas the median OS of patients with negative protein expression of p53 was 62.6 months (p = 0.047). However, in multivariate analysis, p53 overexpression was failed to be an independently significant prognostic factor for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal cancer might offer a chance to prolong survival including those patients with extrapulmonary metastases. p53 protein expression was identified as a prognosis-related factor for surgery.

Anti-PD-1/L1 antibody plus anti-VEGF antibody vs. plus VEGFR-targeted TKI as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Background: This article is based on our previous research, which was presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting I and published in Journal of Clinical Oncology as Conference Abstract (JCO. 2023;41:e16148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16148). Both anti-programmed death 1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) antibody + anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody (A + A) and anti-PD-1/L1 antibody + VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (A + T) are effective first-line therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, there lacks evidence from head-to-head comparisons between these two treatments. We conducted a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of them. Methods: After a rigorous literature research, 6 phase III trials were identified for the final analysis, including IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, COSMIC-312, CARES-310, LEAP-002, and REFLECT. The experiments were classified into three groups: A + A, A + T, and intermediate reference group. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS and PFS, odds ratio (OR) for ORR, and relative risk (RR) for all grade and grade ≥3 TRAEs were calculated. Under Bayesian framework, the meta-analysis was conducted using sorafenib as intermediate reference. Results: With the rank probability of 96%, A + A showed the greatest reduction in the risk of death, without significant difference from A + T (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-1.04). A + T showed the greatest effect in prolonging PFS and improving ORR with the rank probability of 77%, but there were no statistical differences with A + A. A + A was safer than A + T in terms of all grade of TRAEs (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00) and particularly in those grade ≥3 (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.77). Conclusions: A + A had the greatest probability of delivering the longest OS, while A + T was correlated with larger PFS benefits at the cost of a lower safety rate.

XYA-2: a marine-derived compound targeting apoptosis and multiple signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer.

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and fatal disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis for patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of XYA-2 {N-(3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienyl)-2-aza-2-deoxychaetoviridin A}, a nitrogenated azaphilon previously reported from a deep-sea-derived fungus on the progression of pancreatic cancer cells. Methods: The inhibitory effects of XYA-2 on cell proliferation, clonogenic potential, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, migration, and invasion were assessed using various assays. The CCK-8 assay, clone formation assay, flow cytometry assay, wound healing assay, and transwell assay were employed to evaluate cell proliferation, clonogenic potential, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, migration, and invasion, respectively. Moreover, we employed RNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses to uncover the underlying mechanism by which XYA-2 influences pancreatic cancer cells. The revealed mechanism was subsequently validated through qRT-PCR. Results: Our results demonstrated that XYA-2 dose-dependently inhibited the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Additionally, XYA-2 exerted a significant inhibitory effect on the invasion and migration of cancer cells. Moreover, XYA-2 was found to regulate the expression of genes involved in multiple cancer-related pathways based on our RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of XYA-2 as a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Spatiotemporal Quantification of HER2-targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Bystander Activity and Enhancement of Solid Tumor Penetration.

PURPOSE: Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has had a transformative effect on the treatment of many solid tumors, yet it remains unclear how ADCs exert bystander activity in the tumor microenvironment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Here, we directly visualized and spatiotemporally quantified the intratumor biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of different ADC components by developing dual-labeled fluorescent probes. RESULTS: Mechanistically, we found that tumor penetration of ADCs is distinctly affected by their ability to breach the binding site barrier (BSB) in perivascular regions of tumor vasculature, and bystander activity of ADC can only partially breach BSB. Furthermore, bystander activity of ADCs can work in synergy with coadministration of their parental antibodies, leading to fully bypassing BSBs and enhancing tumor penetration via a two-step process. CONCLUSIONS: These promising preclinical data allowed us to initiate a phase I/II clinical study of coadministration of RC48 and trastuzumab in patients with malignant stomach cancer to further evaluate this treatment strategy in humans.

The promise and challenges of combination therapies with antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an important class of cancer therapies that have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of solid tumors. To date, many ongoing studies of ADC combinations with a variety of anticancer drugs, encompassing chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and immunotherapy, are being rigorously conducted in both preclinical studies and clinical trial settings. Nevertheless, combination therapy does not always guarantee a synergistic or additive effect and may entail overlapping toxicity risks. Therefore, understanding the current status and underlying mechanisms of ADC combination therapy is urgently required. This comprehensive review analyzes existing evidence concerning the additive or synergistic effect of ADCs with other classes of oncology medicines. Here, we discuss the biological mechanisms of different ADC combination therapy strategies, provide prominent examples, and assess their benefits and challenges. Finally, we discuss future opportunities for ADC combination therapy in clinical practice.

Efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase â ¡ study.

BACKGROUND: Limited therapeutic options are available for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients after failure of first- and second-line therapies, representing an unmet medical need for novel therapies. METHODS: This is an open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ study aiming to perform the efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, a noval fully humanized IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. SCT200 (6 mg/kg) was given weekly for the first six weeks, followed by a higher dose of 8 mg/kg every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included ORR in patients with left-sided tumor, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. FINDINGS: From February 12, 2018 to December 1, 2019, a total of 110 patients aged between 26 and 77 years (median: 55; interquartile range [IQR]: 47-63) with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC were enrolled from 22 hospitals in China. As the data cut-off date on May 15, 2020, the IRC-assessed ORR and DCR was 31% (34/110, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22-40%) and 75% (82/110, 95% CI 65-82%), respectively. Thirty one percent (34/110) patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR). The median PFS and median OS were 5.1 months (95% CI 3.4-5.2) and 16.2 months (95% CI 11.1-not available [NA]), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypomagnesemia (17%, 19/110) and acneiform dermatitis (11%, 12/110). No deaths occurred. Genomic analysis suggested positive association between MYC amplification and patients' response (P = 0.0058). RAS/RAF mutation and MET amplification were the most frequently detected resistance mechanisms. Patients with high circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline or without ctDNA clearance at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 had worse PFS and OS. INTERPRETATION: SCT200 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients progressed on fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin treatment. The baseline ctDNA and ctDNA clearance status at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 could be a potential prognostic biomarker for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients with SCT200 therapy. FUNDING: This study was sponsored by Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2019ZX09732001-006, 2017ZX09304015).

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023.

The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.