Pathophysiology of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease and the potential role of glucagon-like peptide 2.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation, with gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement (GI aGVHD) being one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Whilst systemic steroids are the standard first-line treatment for aGVHD, approximately 50% of patients become steroid refractory (SR), which is associated with poor outcomes. Existing options for SR-GVHD are limited, and there is a significant unmet need for new non-immunosuppressive treatment approaches in patients with GI aGVHD. Here, we review newer concepts in the pathogenesis of GI aGVHD and present the evidence for the role of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) in maintaining and protecting GI epithelial cells, including the enterocytes, intestinal stem cells and Paneth cells, which are direct targets of aGVHD. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic rationale for GLP-2 treatment as a tissue regeneration approach and the potential use of the novel GLP-2 analogue apraglutide as an adjunctive treatment for GI aGVHD.

Outcomes from a 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Teduglutide in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine safety and pharmacodynamics/efficacy of teduglutide in children with intestinal failure associated with short bowel syndrome (SBS-IF). STUDY DESIGN: This 12-week, open-label study enrolled patients aged 1-17 years with SBS-IF who required parenteral nutrition (PN) and showed minimal or no advance in enteral nutrition (EN) feeds. Patients enrolled sequentially into 3 teduglutide cohorts (0.0125 mg/kg/d [n = 8], 0.025 mg/kg/d [n = 14], 0.05 mg/kg/d [n = 15]) or received standard of care (SOC, n = 5). Descriptive summary statistics were used. RESULTS: All patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most were mild or moderate. No serious teduglutide-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred. Between baseline and week 12, prescribed PN volume and calories (kcal/kg/d) changed by a median of -41% and -45%, respectively, with 0.025 mg/kg/d teduglutide and by -25% and -52% with 0.05 mg/kg/d teduglutide. In contrast, PN volume and calories changed by 0% and -6%, respectively, with 0.0125 mg/kg/d teduglutide and by 0% and -1% with SOC. Per patient diary data, EN volume increased by a median of 22%, 32%, and 40% in the 0.0125, 0.025, and 0.05 mg/kg/d cohorts, respectively, and by 11% with SOC. Four patients achieved independence from PN, 3 in the 0.05 mg/kg/d cohort and 1 in the 0.025 mg/kg/d cohort. Study limitations included its short-term, open-label design, and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Teduglutide was well tolerated in pediatric patients with SBS-IF. Teduglutide 0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg/d was associated with trends toward reductions in PN requirements and advancements in EN feeding in children with SBS-IF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01952080; EudraCT: 2013-004588-30.

Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis in Children: An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind (for Dose) Study.

BACKGROUND: Acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor is standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in adults and increasingly is becoming first-line therapy for children aged 1-17 years. We evaluated endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis with esomeprazole in young children with gastroesophageal reflux disease and described esophageal histology. METHODS: Children aged 1-11 years with endoscopically or histologically confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg daily (<20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg daily (≥ 20 kg) for 8 weeks. Patients with erosive esophagitis underwent an endoscopy after 8 weeks to assess healing of erosions. RESULTS: Of 109 patients, 49% had erosive esophagitis and 51% had histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis without erosive esophagitis. Of the 45 patients who had erosive esophagitis and underwent follow-up endoscopy, 89% experienced erosion resolution. Dilation of intercellular space was reported in 24% of patients with histologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole (0.2-1.0 mg/kg) effectively heals macroscopic and microscopic erosive esophagitis in this pediatric population with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dilation of intercellular space may be an important histologic marker of erosive esophagitis in children.

Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis in Children: An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind (for Dose) Study.

BACKGROUND: Acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor is standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in adults and increasingly is becoming first-line therapy for children aged 1-17 years. We evaluated endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis with esomeprazole in young children with gastroesophageal reflux disease and described esophageal histology. METHODS: Children aged 1-11 years with endoscopically or histologically confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg daily (< 20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg daily (≥ 20 kg) for 8 weeks. Patients with erosive esophagitis underwent an endoscopy after 8 weeks to assess healing of erosions. RESULTS: Of 109 patients, 49% had erosive esophagitis and 51% had histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis without erosive esophagitis. Of the 45 patients who had erosive esophagitis and underwent follow-up endoscopy, 89% experienced erosion resolution. Dilation of intercellular space was reported in 24% of patients with histologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole (0.2-1.0 mg/kg) effectively heals macroscopic and microscopic erosive esophagitis in this pediatric population with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dilation of intercellular space may be an important histologic marker of erosive esophagitis in children.

Safety and Tolerability of Esomeprazole in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and symptom improvement with once-daily esomeprazole in children with endoscopically proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 8-week, multicenter, randomized, uncontrolled, double-blind study, children ages 1 to 11 years were stratified by weight to receive esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg (children < 20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg (children ≥ 20 kg) once daily. Safety and tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs; both treatment- and non-treatment-related AEs) and changes from baseline in medical history, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests. Investigators scored symptom severity every 2 weeks using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Patients' parents rated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and epigastric pain (none to severe, 0-3) at baseline (based on past 72 hours) and daily (from past 24 hours). RESULTS: Of 109 patients randomized, 108 had safety data. AEs were experienced by 68.0% and 65.2% of children <20 kg receiving esomeprazole 5 and 10 mg, respectively, and 83.9% and 82.8% of children ≥ 20 kg receiving esomeprazole 10 and 20 mg, respectively, regardless of causality. Overall, only 9.3% of patients reported 13 treatment-related AEs; the most common were diarrhea (2.8% [3/108]), headache (1.9% [2/108]), and somnolence (1.9% [2/108]). Vomiting, a serious AE in 2 patients, was not judged by the investigator to be related to treatment. At the final visit, PGA scores improved significantly from baseline (P < 0.001). Of 58 patients with moderate to severe baseline PGA symptom scores, 91.4% had lower scores by the final visit. GERD symptom scores were significantly improved from baseline to the final week of the study in all of the treatment groups (P < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS:: In children ages 1 to 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD, esomeprazole (at daily doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg) was generally well tolerated. The frequency and severity of GERD-related symptoms were significantly reduced during the active treatment period.

Safety and Tolerability of Esomeprazole in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and symptom improvement with once-daily esomeprazole in children with endoscopically proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 8-week, multicenter, randomized, uncontrolled, double-blind study, children ages 1 to 11 years were stratified by weight to receive esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg (children < 20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg (children ≥ 20 kg) once daily. Safety and tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs; both treatment- and non-treatment-related AEs) and changes from baseline in medical history, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests. Investigators scored symptom severity every 2 weeks using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Patients' parents rated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and epigastric pain (none to severe, 0-3) at baseline (based on past 72 hours) and daily (from past 24 hours). RESULTS: Of 109 patients randomized, 108 had safety data. AEs were experienced by 68.0% and 65.2% of children < 20 kg receiving esomeprazole 5 and 10 mg, respectively, and 83.9% and 82.8% of children ≥ 20 kg receiving esomeprazole 10 and 20 mg, respectively, regardless of causality. Overall, only 9.3% of patients reported 13 treatment-related AEs; the most common were diarrhea (2.8% [3/108]), headache (1.9% [2/108]), and somnolence (1.9% [2/108]). Vomiting, a serious AE in 2 patients, was not judged by the investigator to be related to treatment. At the final visit, PGA scores improved significantly from baseline (P < 0.001). Of 58 patients with moderate to severe baseline PGA symptom scores, 91.4% had lower scores by the final visit. GERD symptom scores were significantly improved from baseline to the final week of the study in all of the treatment groups (P < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: In children ages 1 to 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD, esomeprazole (at daily doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg) was generally well tolerated. The frequency and severity of GERD-related symptoms were significantly reduced during the active treatment period.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of teduglutide on gastric emptying of liquids in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Teduglutide, a recombinant analog of human glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-2, is a novel therapy recently approved for the treatment of adult patients with short bowel syndrome who are dependent on parenteral support. Previous studies assessing the effect of GLP-2 on gastric emptying in humans have yielded inconsistent results, with some studies showing no effect and others documenting a GLP-2-dependent delay in gastric emptying. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of teduglutide on gastric emptying of liquids in healthy subjects, as measured by the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen. METHODS: This double-blind, parallel-group, single-center study enrolled and randomized 36 healthy subjects (22 men, 14 women) to receive subcutaneous doses of teduglutide 4 mg or placebo (2:1 ratio; 23:13) once daily on Days 1 through 10 in the morning. Gastric emptying of a mixed nutrient liquid meal was assessed by measuring acetaminophen levels predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 hours after administration of 1000 mg acetaminophen on Days 0 and 10. The primary study endpoint was a pharmacokinetic analysis of acetaminophen absorption in subjects receiving teduglutide or placebo. RESULTS: No significant differences in gastric emptying of liquids (acetaminophen area under the concentration [AUC] vs time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, AUC extrapolated to infinity, maximum concentration [Cmax], and time to Cmax) were observed on Day 10 in subjects receiving teduglutide 4 mg versus subjects receiving placebo. There were no serious adverse events (AEs), deaths, or discontinuations due to an AE reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Teduglutide 4 mg/day for 10 days does not affect gastric emptying of liquids in healthy subjects as measured by acetaminophen pharmacokinetics. No unexpected safety signals were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01209351.

Lubiprostone for the treatment of functional constipation in children.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric functional constipation is common; effective, easily administered treatment options are limited. Lubiprostone is an oral chloride channel protein-2 activator that stimulates gastrointestinal fluid secretion, softens stools, and facilitates bowel movements (BMs). We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of lubiprostone in children and adolescents with functional constipation. METHODS: Patients ≥12 kg, 17 years or younger, and with <3 spontaneous BMs (SBMs; ie, BMs that did not occur within 24 hours of rescue medication use) per week were enrolled at 22 US general pediatric and pediatric gastroenterology centers (January 2007-October 2008). Patients received 4 weeks of open-label lubiprostone at doses of 12 µg once daily (QD), 12 µg twice daily (BID), or 24 µg BID based on age and weight. The primary endpoint was SBM frequency during week 1 versus baseline. RESULTS: Of 127 enrolled patients, 124 were treated and analyzed (12 µg QD, n = 27; 12 µg BID, n = 65; 24 µg BID, n = 32), and 109 completed the study. The mean age of treated patients was 10.2 years (range 3-17 years); 65 were boys. Mean SBM frequency significantly increased compared with baseline at week 1 (3.1 vs. 1.5 SBMs/week, P < 0.0001). SBM frequency was improved significantly from baseline overall (P < 0.0001) and for individual dose groups (P ≤ 0.0062) during weeks 2, 3, and 4. Common (≥5%) adverse events included nausea (18.5%), vomiting (12.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), abdominal pain (7.3%), and headache (5.6%). Two patients experienced serious adverse events (unrelated abdominal pain; unrelated sickle cell crisis). CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with functional constipation.

Assessment of abdominal pain through global outcomes and recent FDA recommendations in children: are we ready for change?

OBJECTIVES: Irritable bowel syndrome is a multisymptom construct, with abdominal pain (AP) acting as the driving symptom of patient-reported severity. The Food and Drug Administration considers a >30% decrease in AP as satisfactory improvement, but this has not been validated in children. We investigated the correspondence of 2 measures for AP assessment, ≥30% improvement in AP and global assessment of improvement. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from 72 children who completed a randomized clinical trial for abdominal pain-associated functional gastrointestinal disorders. Children completed daily assessment of AP intensity, functional disability inventory (FDI), question regarding pain's interference with activities, and 2 global assessment questions. We measured the extent to which ≥30% improvement of AP and global assessment questions correlated with each other and with disability. RESULTS: The global questions correlated with each other (r=0.74; P<0.0001) and with a ≥30% improvement in AP (P<0.01). Global outcomes were satisfaction with treatment was inversely related to the child's report of interference with activities (P<0.01) and symptom relief was positively associated with ≥30% improvement in FDI scores (P<0.009). A 30% change in FDI scores was associated with global questions of symptom relief (P=0.009) but not with satisfaction with treatment (P=0.07). The association of AP improvement with interference with activities (P=0.14) or change in FDI scores (P=0.27) did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Currently used global assessments are significantly associated with decreased pain intensity, decreased interference with daily activities, and a ≥30% change in FDI scores, whereas recommended 30% improvement in pain intensity is not as comprehensive.

Single-dose pharmacokinetic properties of esomeprazole in children aged 1 - 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD: a randomized, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the overall exposure after a single dose of esomeprazole in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MATERIALS: Oral esomeprazole administered as an intact capsule with 30 - 180 mL of water, or as an opened capsule mixed with as much as 1 tablespoon of applesauce followed by 30 - 180 mL of water. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label study of children aged 1 - 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD, patients weighing 8 - < 20 kg were randomized to a single 5- or 10-mg oral dose of esomeprazole, and patients weighing >= 20 kg were randomized to a single 10- or 20-mg oral dose of esomeprazole. Esomeprazole exposure (AUC(0-∞)), AUC from zero to last measurable concentration (AUC(0-t)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)), terminal-phase half-life, apparent oral clearance, and apparent volume of distribution were determined. RESULTS: 28 patients were randomized to receive esomeprazole: 14 patients weighing 8 to < 20 kg received esomeprazole 5 mg (n = 7) or 10 mg (n = 7), and 14 patients weighing ≥20 kg received esomeprazole 10 mg (n = 6) or 20 mg (n = 8). Children weighing 8 - < 20 kg had a 1.8-fold higher exposure with the 10-mg vs. 5-mg dose (AUC(0-∞), 1.32 vs. 0.73 µmol·h/L, respectively); children weighing ≥ 20 kg had a 4.4-fold higher exposure with the 20-mg vs. 10-mg dose (AUC(0-∞), 3.06 vs. 0.69 µmol·h/L). C(max) was 2.2-fold higher for the 10-mg vs. 5-mg dose (8 to < 20 kg) and 2.4-fold higher for the 20-mg vs.10-mg dose (>= 20 kg). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of single-dose esomeprazole were dose-dependent in children weighing >= 20 kg but not in children weighing 8 to < 20 kg.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Apraglutide, a Novel, Long-Acting, Synthetic glucagon-like peptide-2 Analog With a Unique Pharmacologic Profile, in Individuals With Impaired Renal Function.

Renal impairment is a common complication in patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Glucagon-like peptide-2 analogs, such as apraglutide, have been developed as a treatment option for SBS-IF. This study assessed the potential for apraglutide overexposure in individuals with severely impaired renal function versus healthy volunteers with normal renal function. In this phase 1, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, parallel-group study, a single dose of apraglutide 5 mg was administered subcutaneously to individuals with severely impaired renal function (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and healthy volunteers with normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and exposure to apraglutide (area under the curve [AUC] from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf], and AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast]). Each group comprised 8 individuals. Results show that patients with severe renal impairment do not have increased apraglutide exposure. Apraglutide achieved a lower Cmax and AUCinf in individuals with severe renal impairment versus those with normal renal function (Cmax = 36.9 vs 59.5 ng/L; AUCinf = 3100 vs 4470 h · ng/mL, respectively). The respective geometric mean ratios were 0.620 and 0.693 for Cmax and AUCinf, and the upper bound of their 90% confidence intervals were <2, indicating patients with severe renal impairment were not overexposed to apraglutide versus those with normal renal function. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Apraglutide does not require dose reduction for any degree of renal impairment and could be used in a broader patient population of renally impaired patients without dose adjustment.

Efficacy and safety of apraglutide in short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure and colon-in-continuity: A multicenter, open-label, metabolic balance study.

BACKGROUND: Apraglutide is a novel long-acting GLP-2 analog in development for short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). This multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study in SBS-IF and colon-in-continuity (CiC) investigates the safety and efficacy of apraglutide. METHODS: This was a 52-week phase 2 metabolic balance study (MBS) in 9 adult patients with SBS-IF-CiC receiving once-weekly subcutaneous apraglutide injections. Safety was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in absorption parameters (MBS at baseline, after 4 weeks with stable parenteral support (PS), and 48 weeks), PS needs (48-week PS adjustment period based on monthly 48-h fluid balances) and intestinal morphology and motility (static and cine MRI at baseline and 4, 24 and 48 weeks). RESULTS: PS volume decreased by -4702 mL/week (-52 %; p < 0.001) at week 52. Seven patients (78 %) achieved ≥1 day off PS at week 52. At 4 weeks, fecal output was reduced by 253 g/day (p = 0.013). At 48 weeks, increases in wet weight absorption by 316 g/day (p = 0.039), energy absorption by 1134 kJ/day (p = 0.041) and carbohydrate absorption by 56.1 g/day (p = 0.024) were observed. Moreover, small bowel length increased from 29.7 to 40.7 cm (p = 0.012), duodenal wall thickness increased by 0.8 mm (p = 0.02) and motility in the proximal colon was reduced (p = 0.031). A total of 127 adverse events was reported, which were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Apraglutide had an acceptable safety profile and was associated with significant reductions in PS needs and days off PS, improvements in intestinal absorption, and structural and functional intestinal changes in patients with SBS-IF-CiC. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number NCT04964986.

Accuracy of pain recall in children.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic abdominal pain (AP) is common in children. Recall of symptoms is used clinically to determine management, to assess treatment progress, and in drug studies to assess outcomes. Limited data exist on accuracy of AP recall in children. The aim of the present study was to assess ability to accurately recall AP in children. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data obtained from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, evaluating amitriptyline in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Children ages 8 to 17 years with AP predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders based on Rome II criteria were recruited from 6 centers. Those with evidence of organic disease were excluded. Patients maintained AP diary daily for 1 month (presence, frequency, and intensity). At the end of the study, patients reported the number of days of AP during previous month. Agreement between daily pain reports and recalled pain was assessed. Univariate analysis was conducted with Spearman rank correlations. RESULTS: We recruited 63 children (45 girls, mean age 12.8 years). Sixteen percent children had perfect agreement on number of days of AP. Fifty-four percent of children recalled fewer episodes of pain. The average number of days with AP by recall was 17.7/month, whereas by diary it was 23.5/month (P = 0.001). Correlation between patient recall of the last week of symptoms (r = 0.47) was no better than correlation between recall of the last 30 days of symptoms (r = 0.48). On comparing AP recall versus various pain intensities, reported AP did not reflect only AP of greater severity. Higher correlation of recall of symptoms was seen in children 11 years or younger (r = 0.59) as compared with children older than 11 years (r = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Few children can accurately recall the episodes of AP. Children commonly recall a lower frequency of AP than that assessed by prospective diary reports. Reported recall does not reflect a shorter recollection period. Recall is not related to intensity of pain. Adolescents have worse recall of symptoms.

Medical update and potential advances in the treatment of pediatric intestinal failure.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) and intestinal failure are chronic malabsorption disorders with considerable nutritional and growth consequences in children. Intestinal failure occurs when the functional gastrointestinal mass is reduced even if there is normal anatomical gastrointestinal length. A number of management strategies are often utilized to achieve successful intestinal rehabilitation and maintain adequate nutrition to avoid intestinal transplant. These strategies include minimizing the effect of parenteral associated liver disease, limiting catheter complications, and treating bacterial overgrowth in the remaining small intestine. In addition, there continues to be significant research interest in enhancing intestinal adaptation with targeted therapies. The purpose of this review is to discuss current perspectives and to highlight recent medical advances in novel investigational therapies.

Parental perceptions of research after completion of placebo-controlled trials in pediatric gastroenterology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Investigators may have concerns that parents will not allow their children to participate in placebo-controlled trials (PCTs). The aim of the present study was to identify potential differences between parental perceptions in families who successfully completed (CO) a clinical trial compared with those who were noncompleters (NC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Parents of both CO and NC children enrolled in pediatric gastrointestinal studies performed in the previous year were eligible. NC were defined as those who were screen failures or treatment nonresponders or had adverse events. One hundred seven parents were identified and mailed a 26-item questionnaire eliciting perceptions regarding participation in research. Questionnaires were sent 6 months after participation in research ended. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (69%) parents returned the survey. Characteristics included maternal responders (98%), English as primary language (97%), and education beyond high school (85%). Five parents (4.7%) had children involved in previous research trials. There were no significant differences in responses found between CO (n = 49; 63%) and NC (n = 29; 37%) in regard to importance of research, perceptions of risk to child, benefits to child, and more attention in the study. Statistical significance was approached in regard to the comfort with the research team, with a greater portion of CO stating that the researcher put the parent at ease and the NC feeling less positive about the interaction (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A positive perception about participation in research is not stratified by successful completion of a PCT. These results should encourage investigators and institutional review boards that if properly designed and conducted, pediatric PCTs can result in a positive experience for parents.

Esomeprazole for the treatment of erosive esophagitis in children: an international, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind (for dose) study.

BACKGROUND: Acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor is standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in adults and increasingly is becoming first-line therapy for children aged 1-17 years. We evaluated endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis with esomeprazole in young children with gastroesophageal reflux disease and described esophageal histology. METHODS: Children aged 1-11 years with endoscopically or histologically confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg daily (< 20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg daily (> or = 20 kg) for 8 weeks. Patients with erosive esophagitis underwent an endoscopy after 8 weeks to assess healing of erosions. RESULTS: Of 109 patients, 49% had erosive esophagitis and 51% had histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis without erosive esophagitis. Of the 45 patients who had erosive esophagitis and underwent follow-up endoscopy, 89% experienced erosion resolution. Dilation of intercellular space was reported in 24% of patients with histologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole (0.2-1.0 mg/kg) effectively heals macroscopic and microscopic erosive esophagitis in this pediatric population with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dilation of intercellular space may be an important histologic marker of erosive esophagitis in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: D9614C00097; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00228527.

Chronic abdominal pain and depressive symptoms: analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent health.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Abdominal pain is common in adolescence. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of depressive symptoms in a large cohort of patients with frequent abdominal pain. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of children aged 13 to 18 years (mean age, 16.2 +/- 1.7 y; 49% male) completed in-home interviews and separate in-school questionnaires for the National Longitudinal Study in Adolescent Health (the Add Health Study). Depressed mood was assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Subjective measures of abdominal pain were reported by 20,745 adolescents from wave 1 of the Add Health Study. Frequency of abdominal pain over the previous 1 year was rated as rare (0-1 episode/wk), moderate (2-3 episodes/wk), or daily (>or=4 episodes/wk). RESULTS: Daily pain is reported in 3.2% of adolescents, with an additional 14% reporting pain as moderate in frequency. Sixteen percent of all adolescents are at risk for developing depression. The risk for depression goes from 16% to 45% (P < .001) when the pain is daily. Compared with rare pain, children with daily pain were more likely to miss school 10 or more times per year (46% vs 19%, P < .001), cry (12.1% vs 1%, P < .001), feel sad (25.2% vs 5.3%, P < .001), and lonely (25.2% vs 6.4%, P < .001). Children with daily pain were likely to consider life a failure versus those with no pain (10.2% vs 3.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with frequent abdominal pain are at increased risk for depressive symptoms, social isolation, and missing school.

PEG3350 in the treatment of childhood constipation: a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy and best starting dose of polyethylene glycol (PEG)3350 in the short-term treatment of children with functional constipation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of PEG3350 in children with functional constipation. Patients were randomly assigned to either placebo or 0.2 g/kg per day, 0.4 g/kg per day, or 0.8 g/kg per day of PEG3350 after a 1 week run-in period, followed by 2 weeks of treatment. All received behavior modification. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a successful treatment response: >or=3 bowel movements (BM) in the second week. RESULTS: 103 children (mean, 8.5 +/- 3.1 years) were enrolled. 77%, 74%, and 73% of the 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 g/kg groups were successfully treated, as compared with 42% receiving placebo (P < .04). There was a significant increase in BM (P < .001) and straining improvement (P < .05) with the different PEG3350 doses. Stool consistency improved significantly for doses 0.4 g/kg or higher (P < .001). There was more abdominal pain and fecal incontinence in patients receiving 0.8 g/kg. PEG3350 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This placebo-controlled study confirms the efficacy and safety of PEG3350 for the short-term treatment of children with functional constipation. We recommend a starting dose of 0.4 g/kg per day.

Safety and tolerability of esomeprazole in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and symptom improvement with once-daily esomeprazole in children with endoscopically proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 8-week, multicenter, randomized, uncontrolled, double-blind study, children ages 1 to 11 years were stratified by weight to receive esomeprazole 5 or 10 mg (children <20 kg) or 10 or 20 mg (children >or=20 kg) once daily. Safety and tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs; both treatment- and non-treatment-related AEs) and changes from baseline in medical history, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests. Investigators scored symptom severity every 2 weeks using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Patients' parents rated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and epigastric pain (none to severe, 0-3) at baseline (based on past 72 hours) and daily (from past 24 hours). RESULTS: Of 109 patients randomized, 108 had safety data. AEs were experienced by 68.0% and 65.2% of children <20 kg receiving esomeprazole 5 and 10 mg, respectively, and 83.9% and 82.8% of children >or=20 kg receiving esomeprazole 10 and 20 mg, respectively, regardless of causality. Overall, only 9.3% of patients reported 13 treatment-related AEs; the most common were diarrhea (2.8% [3/108]), headache (1.9% [2/108]), and somnolence (1.9% [2/108]). Vomiting, a serious AE in 2 patients, was not judged by the investigator to be related to treatment. At the final visit, PGA scores improved significantly from baseline (P < 0.001). Of 58 patients with moderate to severe baseline PGA symptom scores, 91.4% had lower scores by the final visit. GERD symptom scores were significantly improved from baseline to the final week of the study in all of the treatment groups (P < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: In children ages 1 to 11 years with endoscopically proven GERD, esomeprazole (at daily doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg) was generally well tolerated. The frequency and severity of GERD-related symptoms were significantly reduced during the active treatment period.

Dyspepsia in childhood and adolescence: insights and treatment considerations.

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is common in children, with as many as 80% of those being evaluated for chronic abdominal pain reporting symptoms of epigastric discomfort, nausea, or fullness. It is known that patients with persistent complaints have increased comorbidities such as depression and anxiety. The interaction with psychopathologic variables has been found to mediate the association between upper abdominal pain and gastric hypersensitivity. These observations suggest that abnormal central nervous system processing of gastric stimuli may be a relevant pathophysiologic mechanism in FD. Despite increased understanding, no specific therapy has emerged; however, recent nonpharmacological-based options such as hypnosis may be effective. Novel approaches, including dietary manipulation and use of nutraceuticals such as ginger and Iberogast (Medical Futures Inc., Ontario, Canada), may also be considered.