Gaze coordination with strides during walking in the cat.

KEY POINTS: Vision plays a crucial role in guiding locomotion in complex environments, but the coordination between gaze and stride is not well understood. The coordination of gaze shifts, fixations, constant gaze and slow gaze with strides in cats walking on different surfaces were examined. It was found that gaze behaviours are coordinated with strides even when walking on a flat surface in the complete darkness, occurring in a sequential order during different phases of the stride. During walking on complex surfaces, gaze behaviours are typically more tightly coordinated with strides, particularly at faster speeds, only slightly shifting in phase. These findings indicate that the coordination of gaze behaviours with strides is not vision-driven, but is a part of the whole body locomotion synergy; the visual environment and locomotor task modulate it. The results may be relevant to developing diagnostic tools and rehabilitation approaches for patients with locomotor deficits. ABSTRACT: Vision plays a crucial role in guiding locomotion in complex environments. However, the coordination between the gaze and stride is not well understood. We investigated this coordination in cats walking on a flat surface in darkness or light, along a horizontal ladder and on a pathway with small stones. We recorded vertical and horizontal eye movements and 3-D head movement, and calculated where gaze intersected the walkway. The coordination of gaze shifts away from the animal, gaze shifts toward, fixations, constant gaze, and slow gaze with strides was investigated. We found that even during walking on the flat surface in the darkness, all gaze behaviours were coordinated with strides. Gaze shifts and slow gaze toward started in the beginning of each forelimb's swing and ended in its second half. Fixations peaked throughout the beginning and middle of swing. Gaze shifts away began throughout the second half of swing of each forelimb and ended when both forelimbs were in stance. Constant gaze and slow gaze away occurred in the beginning of stance. However, not every behaviour occurred during every stride. Light had a small effect. The ladder and stones typically increased the coordination and caused gaze behaviours to occur 3% earlier in the cycle. At faster speeds, the coordination was often tighter and some gaze behaviours occurred 2-16% later in the cycle. The findings indicate that the coordination of gaze with strides is not vision-driven, but is a part of the whole body locomotion synergy; the visual environment and locomotor task modulate it.

The role of intersegmental dynamics in coordination of the forelimb joints during unperturbed and perturbed skilled locomotion.

Joint coordination during locomotion and how this coordination changes in response to perturbations remains poorly understood. We investigated coordination among forelimb joints during the swing phase of skilled locomotion in the cat. While cats walked on a horizontal ladder, one of the cross-pieces moved before the cat reached it, requiring the cat to alter step size. Direction and timing of the cross-piece displacement were manipulated. We found that the paw was transported in space through body translation and shoulder and elbow rotations, whereas the wrist provided paw orientation required to step on cross-pieces. Kinetic analysis revealed a consistent joint control pattern in all conditions. Although passive interaction and gravitational torques were the main sources of shoulder and elbow motions for most of the movement time, shoulder muscle torque influenced movement of the entire limb at the end of the swing phase, accelerating the shoulder and causing interaction torque that determined elbow motion. At the wrist, muscle and passive torques predominantly compensated for each other. In all perturbed conditions, although all joints and the body slightly contributed to changes in the step length throughout the entire movement, the major adjustment was produced by the shoulder at the movement end. We conclude that joint coordination during the swing phase is produced mainly passively, by exploiting gravity and the limb's intersegmental dynamics, which may simplify the neural control of locomotion. The use of shoulder musculature at the movement end enables flexible responses to environmental disturbances. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to investigate joint control during the swing phase of skilled, accuracy-dependent locomotion in the cat and how this control is altered to adapt to known and unexpected perturbations. We demonstrate that a pattern of joint control that exploits gravitational and interaction torques is used in all conditions and that movement modifications are produced mainly by shoulder muscle torque during the last portion of the movement.

Metastatic secondary gliosarcoma: patient series.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma is a rare and highly malignant cancer of the central nervous system with the ability to metastasize. Secondary gliosarcoma, or the evolution of a spindle cell-predominant tumor after the diagnosis of a World Health Organization grade IV glioblastoma, has also been shown to metastasize. There is little information on metastatic secondary gliosarcoma. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present a series of 7 patients with previously diagnosed glioblastoma presenting with recurrent tumor and associated metastases with repeat tissue diagnosis consistent with gliosarcoma. The authors describe the clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics in addition to carrying out a systematic review on metastases in secondary gliosarcoma. LESSONS: The present institutional series and the systematic review of the literature show that metastatic secondary gliosarcoma is a highly aggressive disease with a poor prognosis.

Head movement during walking in the cat.

Knowledge of how the head moves during locomotion is essential for understanding how locomotion is controlled by sensory systems of the head. We have analyzed head movements of the cat walking along a straight flat pathway in the darkness and light. We found that cats' head left-right translations, and roll and yaw rotations oscillated once per stride, while fore-aft and vertical translations, and pitch rotations oscillated twice. The head reached its highest vertical positions during second half of each forelimb swing, following maxima of the shoulder/trunk by 20-90°. Nose-up rotation followed head upward translation by another 40-90° delay. The peak-to-peak amplitude of vertical translation was ∼1.5cm and amplitude of pitch rotation was ∼3°. Amplitudes of lateral translation and roll rotation were ∼1cm and 1.5-3°, respectively. Overall, cats' heads were neutral in roll and 10-30° nose-down, maintaining horizontal semicircular canals and utriculi within 10° of the earth horizontal. The head longitudinal velocity was 0.5-1m/s, maximal upward and downward linear velocities were ∼0.05 and ∼0.1m/s, respectively, and maximal lateral velocity was ∼0.05m/s. Maximal velocities of head pitch rotation were 20-50°/s. During walking in light, cats stood 0.3-0.5cm taller and held their head 0.5-2cm higher than in darkness. Forward acceleration was 25-100% higher and peak-to-peak amplitude of head pitch oscillations was ∼20°/s larger. We concluded that, during walking, the head of the cat is held actively. Reflexes appear to play only a partial role in determining head movement, and vision might further diminish their role.