Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther ; 368(3): 514-523, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30606762

RESUMEN

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists that represent an effective class of insulin-sensitizing agents; however, clinical use is associated with weight gain and peripheral edema. To elucidate the role of PPARγ expression in endothelial cells (ECs) in these side effects, EC-targeted PPARγ knockout (Pparg ΔEC) mice were placed on a high-fat diet to promote PPARγ agonist-induced plasma volume expansion, and then treated with the TZD rosiglitazone. Compared with Pparg-floxed wild-type control (Pparg f/f) mice, Pparg ΔEC treated with rosiglitazone are resistant to an increase in extracellular fluid, water content in epididymal and inguinal white adipose tissue, and plasma volume expansion. Interestingly, histologic assessment confirmed significant rosiglitazone-mediated capillary dilation within white adipose tissue of Pparg f/f mice, but not Pparg ΔEC mice. Analysis of ECs isolated from untreated mice in both strains suggested the involvement of changes in endothelial junction formation. Specifically, compared with cells from Pparg f/f mice, Pparg ΔEC cells had a 15-fold increase in focal adhesion kinase, critically important in EC focal adhesions, and >3-fold significant increase in vascular endothelial cadherin, the main component of focal adhesions. Together, these results indicate that rosiglitazone has direct effects on the endothelium via PPARγ activation and point toward a critical role for PPARγ in ECs during rosiglitazone-mediated plasma volume expansion.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/metabolismo , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , PPAR gamma/deficiencia , Rosiglitazona/farmacología , Remodelación Vascular/fisiología , Tejido Adiposo/irrigación sanguínea , Tejido Adiposo/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Eliminación de Gen , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , PPAR gamma/genética , Volumen Plasmático/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Plasmático/fisiología , Remodelación Vascular/efectos de los fármacos
2.
J Lipid Res ; 54(1): 177-88, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103473

RESUMEN

The use of nicotinic acid to treat dyslipidemia is limited by induction of a "flushing" response, mediated in part by the interaction of prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)) with its G-protein coupled receptor, DP1 (Ptgdr). The impact of DP1 blockade (genetic or pharmacologic) was assessed in experimental murine models of atherosclerosis. In Ptgdr(-/-)ApoE(-/-) mice versus ApoE(-/-) mice, both fed a high-fat diet, aortic cholesterol content was modestly higher (1.3- to 1.5-fold, P < 0.05) in Ptgdr(-/-)ApoE(-/-) mice at 16 and 24 weeks of age, but not at 32 weeks. In multiple ApoE(-/-) mouse studies, a DP1-specific antagonist, L-655, generally had a neutral to beneficial effect on aortic lipids in the presence or absence of nicotinic acid treatment. In a separate study, a modest increase in some atherosclerotic measures was observed with L-655 treatment in Ldlr(-/-) mice fed a high-fat diet for 8 weeks; however, this effect was not sustained for 16 or 24 weeks. In the same study, treatment with nicotinic acid alone generally decreased plasma and/or aortic lipids, and addition of L-655 did not negate those beneficial effects. These studies demonstrate that inhibition of DP1, with or without nicotinic acid treatment, does not lead to consistent or sustained effects on plaque burden in mouse atherosclerotic models.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Niacina/farmacología , Placa Aterosclerótica/tratamiento farmacológico , Placa Aterosclerótica/metabolismo , Receptores Inmunológicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores Inmunológicos/genética , Receptores de Prostaglandina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Prostaglandina/genética , Animales , Aorta/efectos de los fármacos , Aorta/metabolismo , Apolipoproteínas E/deficiencia , Colesterol/metabolismo , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Niacina/uso terapéutico , Placa Aterosclerótica/genética , Receptores Inmunológicos/deficiencia , Receptores de LDL/deficiencia , Receptores de Prostaglandina/deficiencia , Receptores de Tromboxano A2 y Prostaglandina H2/metabolismo
3.
Endocrinology ; 147(9): 4252-62, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16728496

RESUMEN

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonists are insulin sensitizers, whereas PPAR alpha agonists are lipid-lowering agents in humans. Chronic treatment with PPAR gamma agonists has been shown to prevent the onset of diabetes in young Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats; however, the effects of PPAR alpha agonists have not been well characterized in this model. Here we investigated chronic efficacy of PPAR alpha and nonthiazolidinedione (nTZD) PPAR gamma agonists on the onset of diabetes in 6-wk-old male ZDF rats. Whereas treatment with the nTZD PPAR gamma agonist completely prevented development of hyperglycemia, PPAR alpha activation was associated with lowering of food intake and body weight and reductions in fed and fasting hyperglycemia, with prevention of the hyperinsulinemic peak preceding the development of hyperglycemia in ZDF rats. Both compounds improved glucose tolerance during an oral glucose tolerance test with concomitant increases in insulin response. Such improvements of insulin secretion were associated with increased islet to total pancreatic area ratio and pancreatic insulin contents. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies demonstrated that nTZD PPAR gamma reduced basal endogenous glucose production and increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, consistent with an improved insulin action as a cause of the improved glucose homeostasis. In contrast, activation of PPAR alpha did not significantly improve glucose metabolism during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. In conclusion, chronic treatment of ZDF rats with a PPAR gamma agonist completely prevented the onset of diabetes by improving both insulin action and secretion, whereas PPAR alpha agonism was partially effective, primarily by improving the pancreatic islet insulin response. Unlike the PPAR gamma agonist, the PPAR alpha agonist demonstrated efficacy without inducing body weight gain and cardiomegaly. This study suggests a possible role for PPAR alpha agonists in the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , PPAR alfa/agonistas , PPAR gamma/agonistas , Animales , Glucemia/metabolismo , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Ingestión de Alimentos/efectos de los fármacos , Ayuno , Alimentos , Técnica de Clampeo de la Glucosa , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Homeostasis , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Insulina/sangre , Insulina/farmacología , Islotes Pancreáticos/patología , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/química , PPAR alfa/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Zucker , Triglicéridos/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA