Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol ; 325(6): F707-F716, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37795535

RESUMEN

Blood pressure (BP) responses to sodium intake show great variation, discriminating salt-sensitive (SS) from salt-resistant (SR) individuals. The pathophysiology behind salt sensitivity is still not fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate salt-induced effects on body fluid, vascular tone, and autonomic cardiac response with regard to BP change in healthy normotensive individuals. We performed a randomized crossover study in 51 normotensive individuals with normal body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Subjects followed both a low-Na+ diet (LSD, <50 mmol/day) and a high-Na+ diet (HSD, >200 mmol/day). Cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and cardiac autonomous activity, through heart rate variability and cross-correlation baroreflex sensitivity (xBRS), were assessed with noninvasive continuous finger BP measurements. In a subset, extracellular volume (ECV) was assessed by iohexol measurements. Subjects were characterized as SS if mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased ≥3 mmHg after HSD. After HSD, SS subjects (25%) showed a 6.1-mmHg (SD 1.9) increase in MAP. No differences between SS and SR in body weight, cardiac output, or ECV were found. SVR was positively correlated with Delta BP (r = 0.31, P = 0.03). xBRS and heart rate variability were significantly higher in SS participants compared to SR participants after both HSD and LSD. Sodium loading did not alter heart rate variability within groups. Salt sensitivity in normotensive individuals is associated with an inability to decrease SVR upon high salt intake that is accompanied by alterations in autonomous cardiac regulation, as reflected by decreased xBRS and heart rate variability. No discriminatory changes upon high salt were observed among salt-sensitive individuals in body weight and ECV.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Extracellular fluid expansion in normotensive individuals after salt loading is present in both salt-sensitive and salt-resistant individuals and is not discriminatory to the blood pressure response to sodium loading in a steady-state measurement. In normotensive subjects, the ability to sufficiently vasodilate seems to play a pivotal role in salt sensitivity. In a normotensive cohort, differences in sympathovagal balance are also present in low-salt conditions rather than being affected by salt loading. Whereas treatment and prevention of salt-sensitive blood pressure increase are mostly focused on renal sodium handling and extracellular volume regulation, our study suggests that an inability to adequately vasodilate and altered autonomous cardiac functioning are additional key players in the pathophysiology of salt-sensitive blood pressure increase.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Cloruro de Sodio Dietético , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea , Cloruro de Sodio Dietético/efectos adversos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Estudios Cruzados , Cloruro de Sodio/farmacología , Sodio/farmacología , Peso Corporal
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(12): 3629-3636, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548047

RESUMEN

AIMS: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during kidney transplant procedures is associated with adverse outcome. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is an enzyme that has the potential to dampen IRI. Prior to this study, it had not been tested in the setting of kidney transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of peri-procedural AP administration in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center pilot study, all eligible recipients of living donor kidneys were asked to give informed consent. AP (bRESCAP) or a placebo was administered intravenously over 24 hours after the transplantation procedure. The primary outcome-graft function at 1 year-was represented by iohexol measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Serum and urine biomarkers within seven days after surgery were used as surrogate markers of kidney function and injury. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled of whom five were treated with bRESCAP and six with placebo. After 1 year, mGFR was not different between groups. No specific adverse events were observed in the bRESCAP group. Urine expression of injury biomarkers CCL14, NGAL and Cystatin C was lower in the bRESCAP group at day seven. This was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that bRESCAP treatment is feasible in kidney transplantation, might have a dampening effect on IRI induced renal inflammation, and raises no safety concerns. Future research will evaluate the effects of bRESCAP treatment in donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation where IRI is more pronounced.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Daño por Reperfusión , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Fosfatasa Alcalina , Proyectos Piloto , Donadores Vivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Riñón , Daño por Reperfusión/etiología , Biomarcadores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA