Pilot Study: Short Term Impact of Radiation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism.

Despite the risk of complications, high dose radiation therapy is increasingly utilized in the management of selected bone malignancies. In this study, we investigate the impact of moderate to high dose radiation (over 50 Gy) on bone metabolism and structure. Between 2015 and 2018, patients with a primary malignant bone tumor of the sacrum that were either treated with high dose definitive radiation only or a combination of moderate to high dose radiation and surgery were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. Quantitative CTs were performed before and after radiation to determine changes in volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) of the irradiated and non-irradiated spine. Bone histomorphometry was performed on biopsies of the irradiated sacrum and the non-irradiated iliac crest of surgical patients using a quadruple tetracycline labeling protocol. In total, 9 patients were enrolled. Two patients received radiation only (median dose 78.3 Gy) and 7 patients received a combination of preoperative radiation (median dose 50.4 Gy), followed by surgery. Volumetric BMD of the non-irradiated lumbar spine did not change significantly after radiation, while the BMD of the irradiated sacrum did (pre-radiation median: 108.0 mg/cm3 (IQR 91.8-167.1); post-radiation median: 75.3 mg/cm3 (IQR 57.1-110.2); p = 0.010). The cancellous bone of the non-irradiated iliac crest had a stable bone formation rate, while the irradiated sacrum showed a significant decrease in bone formation rate [pre-radiation median: 0.005 mm3/mm2/year (IQR 0.003-0.009), post-radiation median: 0.001 mm3/mm2/year (IQR 0.001-0.001); p = 0.043]. Similar effects were seen in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes. This pilot study shows a decrease of volumetric BMD and bone formation rate after high-dose radiation therapy. Further studies with larger cohorts and other endpoints are needed to get more insight into the effect of radiation on bone. Level of evidence: IV.

How Does the Level of Nerve Root Resection in En Bloc Sacrectomy Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: For patients with sacral tumors, who are well enough for surgery, en bloc resection is the preferred treatment. Survival, postoperative complications, and recurrent rates have been described, but patient-reported outcomes often are not included in these studies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to compare patient-reported outcomes after en bloc sacrectomy, based on the level of sacral nerve root resection, in terms of mental health, physical health, bowel function, and sexual function; and (2) to assess differences in terms of mental health, physical health, and pain between patients with and without a colostomy. METHODS: A total of 74 patients, of whom 58 (78%) were diagnosed with chordoma, were surveyed between February 2012 and October 2014. This represented 48% of patients with sacral chordoma who were alive and who had been treated with a transverse sacral resection between June 2000 and August 2013 at three institutions with a minimum followup of 6 months (mean, 59 months; range, 6-255 months). We chose 6 months because we believe that neurologic deficits generally are stable by this point and that patients generally have recovered from the operation by this time. Patients were divided into five groups based on the most caudal nerve root spared: L5 (N = 10), S1 (N = 22), S2 (N = 17), S3 (N = 18), and S4 (N = 7). Only postoperative outcomes were collected using the National institute of Health's Patient Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health survey, PROMIS Pain Interference survey, PROMIS Pain Intensity survey, PROMIS Sexual Function survey, and the Modified Obstruction and Defecation Score survey. RESULTS: Differences between two adjacent levels were found in terms of mental health, physical health, and sexual function. Patients in whom the S2 nerve roots were spared had a lower mental health score (median = 44, interquartile range [IQR] = 41-51) than patients in whom the S3 nerve roots were spared (median = 53, IQR = 48-56, q = 0.049). Patients in whom the S2 nerve roots were spared had a slightly lower physical health score (median = 42, IQR = 40-51) than patients in whom the S3 nerve roots were spared (median = 47, IQR = 45-54, q = 0.043). Patients in whom the S1 roots were spared (median = 1.0, range = 1.0-1.0) had a lower orgasm score than patients in whom the S2 nerve roots were spared (median = 3, range = 2-5, q = 0.027). No differences in terms of mental health, physical health, or pain were found between the colostomy group and the no colostomy group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of our findings can be used to further educate patients and discuss expectations. In an operative setting, these data can be considered when deciding to place a colostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Among Musculoskeletal Surgeons, Job Dissatisfaction Is Associated With Burnout.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is common in professions such as medicine in which employees have frequent and often stressful interpersonal interactions where empathy and emotional control are important. Burnout can lead to decreased effectiveness at work, negative health outcomes, and less job satisfaction. A relationship between burnout and job satisfaction is established for several types of physicians but is less studied among surgeons who treat musculoskeletal conditions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) For surgeons treating musculoskeletal conditions, what risk factors are associated with worse job dissatisfaction? (2) What risk factors are associated with burnout symptoms? METHODS: Two hundred ten (52% of all active members of the Science of Variation Group [SOVG]) surgeons who treat musculoskeletal conditions (94% orthopaedic surgeons and 6% trauma surgeons; in Europe, general trauma surgeons do most of the fracture surgery) completed the Global Job Satisfaction instrument, Shirom-Malamed Burnout Measure, and provided practice and surgeon characteristics. Most surgeons were male (193 surgeons, 92%) and most were academically employed (186 surgeons, 89%). Factors independently associated with job satisfaction and burnout were identified with multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Greater symptoms of burnout (ß, -7.13; standard error [SE], 0.75; 95% CI, -8.60 to -5.66; p < 0.001; adjusted R(2), 0.33) was the only factor independently associated with lower job satisfaction. Having children (ß, -0.45; SE, 0.0.21; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.043; p = 0.030; adjusted R(2), 0.046) was the only factor independently associated with fewer symptoms of burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Among an active research group of largely academic surgeons treating musculoskeletal conditions, most are satisfied with their job. Efforts to limit burnout and job satisfaction by optimizing engagement in and deriving meaning from the work are effective in other settings and merit attention among surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Sacral chordoma: a clinical review of 101 cases with 30-year experience in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence rates are high in sacral chordoma patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy may play a role in increasing local control. Patients with locally recurrent tumors continue to comprise a significant proportion of the sacral chordoma population and appear to have worse prognosis than those with primary tumors. High-quality studies comparing presentation and treatments for primary and first local recurrent sacral chordoma tumors are sparse. PURPOSE: To determine: whether there is a difference in how primary and tumors at first recurrence present; the overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant relapse-free survival rates and prognostic factors for patients presenting with a primary tumor; overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant relapse-free survival rates and prognostic factors for patients presenting with a first local relapse; if there any differences in overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant relapse-free survival rates between patients presenting with a primary tumor and those with a first local relapse. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred one sacral chordoma cases. OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant relapse-free survival rates. METHODS: Between 1978 and 2013, 131 patients with sacral chordoma were seen. Of them, 17 patients (13%) presented with a history of more than one local recurrence. One patient (1%) presented with multiple distant metastases. Ten patients (8%) had less than 36 months of follow-up and had no event (eg, death, local recurrence, or distant metastasis). A total of 102 patients met our inclusion criteria: patients with primary or first recurrent tumors, without metastatic disease, who underwent surgery and with at least 36 months of follow-up. One patient (1%) died intraoperatively; therefore, 101 patients were included in the present analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for primary and local recurrent tumor separately and to compare primary and local recurrent tumors. RESULTS: We analyzed 73 primary and 28 first time recurrent sacral chordomas. Tumor size at presentation was different for primary and recurrent tumors (primary median size: 158 cm3, interquartile range [IQR]: 46-634; recurrent median size: 39 cm3, IQR: 14-175; p=.001). Overall survival at 5 and 10years for the primary tumors was 79% and 59%, respectively. Local relapse-free survival at 5years was 86%. For primary tumors, not receiving radiation was an independent predictor for worse local relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0043-0.90; p=.004) and increased tumor size was an independent predictor for both worse overall survival (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.38-2.42; p=.004) and worse distant relapse-free survival (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.47-3.44; p<.001). For recurrent tumors, the 5- and 10-year overall survival was 65% and 40%, respectively. Local relapse-free survival at 5years was 79% for recurrent tumors. On bivariate analysis, increased tumor size was a significant predictor for worse survival (LR median: 338 mL; IQR: 218-503 mL; no LR median: 26 mL; IQR: 9-71 mL). A trend was seen toward better distant relapse survival for tumors presenting as a primary tumor (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.25-1.06; p=.072). CONCLUSION: Using a combination of surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy allowed us to obtain a good overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant relapse-free survival in patients presenting with either a primary tumor or with a first time local recurrent tumor.

Early Revision Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' outcomes after revision of tibial plateau fracture fixation within 12 months of the initial surgical procedure. To assess differences in objective outcome scores [International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), short form-36, arthrosis score, physical examination] depending on whether patients were treated for malreduction, malunion, or nonunion. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven patients who underwent revision within 1 year of primary surgery and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: IKDC Subjective Knee Form, alignment, osteoarthritis, timed up and go test, range of motion, and physical and mental health (using the short form-36 survey). RESULTS: At the most recent follow-up, the mean IKDC subjective knee score of all patients within the study group was 62 (SD 17). In the malreduction group, the mean was 71 (SD 17), in the malunion group the mean was 56 (SD 17), and in the nonunion group, the mean was also 56 (SD 12; χ 0.94; P = 0.624). Comparing the malreduction group with the malunion and nonunion groups combined, there was a significantly higher IKDC score (P = 0.019) in the malreduction group. CONCLUSION: A suboptimal outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of a tibial plateau fracture is common. If the underlying cause of the fracture is malreduction, malunion, or a nonunion, salvage of the joint without a knee replacement is worthwhile. When using a strategy incorporating revision plate fixation, osteotomy (intra- and/or extraarticular), debridement, and bone grafting when needed, patients should experience favorable long-term outcomes, including less residual pain and functional limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What questionnaires to use when measuring quality of life in sacral tumor patients: the updated sacral tumor survey.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patient-reported outcomes are becoming increasingly important when investigating results of patient and disease management. In sacral tumor, the symptoms of patients can vary substantially; therefore, no single questionnaire can adequately account for the full spectrum of symptoms and disability. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze redundancy within the current sacral tumor survey and make a recommendation for an updated version based on the results and patient and expert opinions. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A survey study from a tertiary care orthopedic oncology referral center was used. PATIENT SAMPLE: The patient sample included 70 patients with sacral tumors (78% chordoma). OUTCOME MEASURES: The following 10 questionnaires included in the current sacral tumor survey were evaluated: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Item short form, PROMIS Pain Intensity short form, PROMIS Pain Interference short form, PROMIS Neuro-QOL v1.0 Lower Extremity Function short form, PROMIS v1.0 Anxiety short form, the PROMIS v1.0 Depression short form, the International Continence Society Male short form, the Modified Obstruction-Defecation Syndrome questionnaire, the PROMIS Sexual Function Profile v1.0, and the Stoma Quality of Life tool. METHODS: We performed an exploratory factor analysis to calculate the possible underlying latent traits. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to measure to what extent the questionnaires converged. We hypothesized the existence of six domains based on current literature: mental health, physical health, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual function, and urinary incontinence. To assess content validity, we surveyed 32 patients, 9 orthopedic oncologists, 1 medical oncologist, 1 radiation oncologist, and 1 orthopedic oncology nurse practitioner with experience in treating sacral tumor patients on the relevance of the domains. RESULTS: Reliability as measured by Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.65 to 0.96. Coverage measured by floor and ceiling effects ranged from 0% to 52% and from 0% to 30%, respectively. Explanatory factor analysis identified three traits to which the questionnaires that were expected to measure a similar construct correlated the most: mental health, physical function, and pain. Content validity index demonstrated low disagreement among patients (range: 0.10-0.18) and high agreement among physicians (range: 0.91-1.0) on the relevance of the proposed domains. Social health was identified by 50% of the commenting patients as an important yet missing domain. CONCLUSIONS: The current sacral tumor survey is incomplete and time-consuming, and not all surveys are appropriate for the sacral tumor population. Our recommended survey contains less than half the questions and includes the newly recognized social health domain.