Multichannel recording of tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

STUDY AIMS: The topography of the peaks of tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) varies among healthy subjects, most likely because of differences in position and orientation of their cortical generator(s). Therefore, amplitude estimation with a standard one- or two-channel derivation is likely to be inaccurate and might partly cause the low sensitivity of SEP amplitude to pathological changes. In this study, we investigate whether 128-channel tibial-nerve SEP recordings can improve amplitude estimation and reduce the coefficient of variation. METHODS: We recorded tibial-nerve SEPs using a 128-channel EEG system in 48 healthy subjects aged 20 to 70 years (47 provided analyzable data). We compared P39, N50, and P60 amplitudes obtained with a 128-channel analysis method (based on butterfly plots and spatial topographies) with those obtained using a one-channel conventional configuration and analysis. Scalp and earlobe references were compared. RESULTS: Tibial-nerve SEP amplitudes obtained with the 128-channel method were significantly higher as compared to the one-channel conventional method. Consequently, the coefficient of variation was lower for the 128-channel method. In addition, in both methods, the N50-peak amplitude was sometimes hard to identify, because of its low amplitude. Besides, in some subjects, the N50 peak, as obtained with the conventional method, rather seemed to be a period between two positivities rather than an activation peak on itself. CONCLUSIONS: The 128-channel method can measure tibial-nerve SEP amplitude more accurately and might therefore be more sensitive to pathological changes. Our results indicate that the N50 component is less useful for clinical practice.

128-channel somatosensory evoked potentials in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders.

PURPOSE: The differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders can be very difficult, especially at an early stage. In this study, we investigated whether SEP amplitude recorded by 128-channel EEG is useful for diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders, and in particular whether SEP asymmetry can differentiate corticobasal degeneration (CBGD) from other parkinsonian disorders. METHODS: We recorded median nerve SEPs in 47 patients suspected of CBGD, supranuclear palsy or definite Parkinson's disease at an early stage. We compared SEP asymmetry and parietal peak amplitudes of the patients after grouping them based on their clinical diagnosis after 1-5 years of follow-up. In nine subjects the diagnosis remained unclear. RESULTS: Three of 13 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CBGD had an abnormal SEP asymmetry. Furthermore, we found extremely high N20 amplitudes in three other patients with CBGD. However, similar asymmetry abnormalities were found in patients with other Parkinsonian disorders. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of 128-channel SEP recordings and analysis techniques, which are more accurate than conventional techniques, sensitivity and specificity of cortical median nerve SEP asymmetry and parietal amplitude for differentiating CBGD from other parkinsonian disorders were low at an early stage of the disease. A possible reason for this may be that the hand area of the primary somatosensory cortex was not yet affected in most CBGD patients.