Optimization of performance of Dutch newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Dutch newborn screening (NBS) for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) introduced in 2011 showed a sensitivity of 90% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 63%. We describe a study including an optimization phase and evaluation of the modified protocol. METHODS: Dutch protocol consists of four steps: determination of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP), DNA analysis by INNO-LiPA and extended gene analysis (EGA). For the optimization phase we used results of 556,952 newborns screened between April 2011 and June 2014 to calculate effects of 13 alternative protocols on sensitivity, specificity, PPV, ratios of CF to other diagnoses, and costs. One alternative protocol was selected based on calculated sensitivity, PPV and costs and was implemented on 1st July 2016. In this modified protocol DNA analysis is performed in samples with a combination of IRT ≥60 µg/l and PAP ≥3.0 µg/l, IRT ≥100 µg/l and PAP ≥1.2 µg/l or IRT ≥124 µg/l and PAP not relevant. Results of 599,137 newborns screened between 1st July 2016 and 31st December 2019 were similarly evaluated as in the optimization phase. RESULTS: The modified protocol showed a sensitivity of 95%, PPV of 76%, CF to CF transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome/CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnoses (CRMS/CFSPID) ratio 12/1, CF/CF carrier ratio 4/1. Costs per screened newborn were slightly higher. Eleven children, of whom five with classic CF, would not have been referred with the previous protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The modified protocol results in acceptable sensitivity (95%) and good PPV of 76% with minimal increase in costs.

Implementation of a cost-effective strategy to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset Group B haemolytic streptococcus infection (EOGBS) is an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the first week of life. Primary prevention of EOGBS is possible with intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP.) Different prevention strategies are used internationally based on identifying pregnant women at risk, either by screening for GBS colonisation and/or by identifying risk factors for EOGBS in pregnancy or labour. A theoretical cost-effectiveness study has shown that a strategy with IAP based on five risk factors (risk-based strategy) or based on a positive screening test in combination with one or more risk factors (combination strategy) was the most cost-effective approach in the Netherlands. IAP for all pregnant women with a positive culture in pregnancy (screening strategy) and treatment in line with the current Dutch guideline (IAP after establishing a positive culture in case of pre-labour rupture of membranes or preterm birth and immediate IAP in case of intra-partum fever, previous sibling with EOGBS or GBS bacteriuria), were not cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness was based on the assumption of 100% adherence to each strategy. However, adherence in daily practice will be lower and therefore have an effect on cost-effectiveness. METHOD/DESIGN: The aims are to: a.) implement the current Dutch guideline, the risk-based strategy and the combination strategy in three pilot regions and b.) study the effects of these strategies in daily practice. Regions where all the care providers in maternity care implement the allocated strategy will be randomised. Before the introduction of the strategy, there will be a pre-test (use of the current guideline) involving 105 pregnant women per region. This will be followed by a post-test (use of the allocated strategy) involving 315 women per region. The outcome measures are: 1.) adherence to the specific prevention strategy and the determinants of adherence among care providers and pregnant women, 2.) outcomes in pregnant women and their babies and 3.) the costs of each strategy in relation to the effects. DISCUSSION: This study will provide recommendations for the implementation of the most cost-effective prevention strategy for EOGBS in the Netherlands on the basis of feasibility in daily practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register, NTR3965.