RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcome of rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in newly progressed mCRPC patients after response to initial [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). METHODS: We retrospectively included 18 patients who underwent rechallenge with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. All patients presented with (i) newly progressed disease after response to initial PRLT; (ii) a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirming the presence of PSMA-positive metastases; iii) ECOG performance status 0-1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Response was assessed by PSA and classified according to PCWG3 recommendations. For patients who underwent restaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, imaging response was categorised according to adapted PERCIST v1.0. In patients with discordant [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and PSA, other available imaging modalities were evaluated to confirm disease status. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the first cycle of initial PRLT and rechallenge PRLT, respectively, until last patient contact or death. RESULTS: Patients were initially treated with a median of 5 cycles (range 4-7) and were rechallenged after a median of 9 months (range 3-13). Each patient received a median of 4 (range 2-7) rechallenge cycles (median cumulative activity 26.1 GBq). None of the patients experienced life-threatening G4 adverse events during either treatment period. Grade 3 adverse events included one case of anaemia, one case of thrombocytopenia, and one case of renal failure. In 8/18 patients long-term toxicities were evaluated. Serious toxicities (≥ Grade 3) occurred in 3/8 patients (n = 1 G4 thrombocytopenia, n = 1 G4 renal failure and n = 1 pancytopenia and G4 renal failure). Best PSA50%-response was observed in 44% of patients and PSA-disease control was confirmed in 56% of patients at the last cycle. Of the 12/18 patients restaged by imaging, 6/12 (50%) patients had disease control (partial response/stable disease), 1/12 had a mixed response, and 5/12 had progression. After a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 14-44), 10 patients had died, 7 were still alive, and one patient was lost at follow-up. The median OS was 29 months (95%CI, 14.3-43.7 months) for the initial treatment and 11 months (95%CI, 8.1-13.8 months) for the first rechallenge course. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients benefit from rechallenge PRLT. Our analysis suggests that rechallenge may prolong survival in selected patients, with an acceptable safety profile.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess early tumor response with quantitated SPECT/CT and to correlate it with clinical outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with 177Lutetium-PSMA I&T therapy. METHODS: Single-center, observational study, part of the prospective Swiss national cancer registry study investigating the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (EKNZ: 2021-01271) in mCRPC patients treated with at least two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T 6-weekly. After the first and second cycle quantitated SPECT/CT (Symbia Intevo, Siemens) was acquired 48 h after injection (three fields of view from head to thigh, 5 s/frame) and reconstructed using xQuant® (48i, 1 s, 10-mm Gauss). Image analysis: The PSMA-positive total tumor volumes (TTV) were semi-automatically delineated using a SUV threshold of 3 with MIMencore® (version 7.1.3, Medical Image Merge Software Inc.). Changes in TTV, highest tumor SUVmax, and total tumor SUVmean between cycles 1 and 2 were calculated and grouped into a) stable or decrease and b) increase. Serum PSA levels were assessed at each therapy cycle and at follow-up until progression or death. Changes in TTV, PSA, SUVmax, and SUVmean were correlated with PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and the overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier methodology (log-rank test). RESULTS: Between 07/2020 and 04/2022, 111 patients were screened and 73 finally included in the data analysis. The median follow-up was 8.9 months (range 1.4-26.6 months). Stable or decreased TTV at cycle 2 was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.86, p < 0.01). Similar, stable, or decreased PSA was associated with longer OS (HR 0.21; CI 0.07-0.62, p < 0.01) and PSA-PFS (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.16-0.72, p < 0.01). Combining TTV and PSA will result in an augmented prognostic value for OS (HR 0.09; CI 0.01-0.63; p < 0.01) and for PSA-PFS (HR 0.11; CI 0.02-0.68; p < 0.01). A reduction of SUVmax or SUVmean was not prognostically relevant, neither for OS (p 0.88 and 0.7) nor for PSA-PFS (p 0.73 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Six weeks after initiating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T, TTV and serum PSA appear to be good prognosticators for OS. Combined together, TTV + PSA change demonstrates augmented prognostic value and can better predict PSA-PFS. Larger studies using TTV change prospectively as an early-response biomarker are warranted for implementing management change towards a more personalized clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Urea/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Suiza , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Resultado del Tratamiento , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo/uso terapéutico , Lutecio/uso terapéutico , Dipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Treatment planning through the diagnostic dimension of theranostics provides insights into predicting the absorbed dose of RPT, with the potential to individualize radiation doses for enhancing treatment efficacy. However, existing studies focusing on dose prediction from diagnostic data often rely on organ-level estimations, overlooking intra-organ variations. This study aims to characterize the intra-organ theranostic heterogeneity and utilize artificial intelligence techniques to localize them, i.e. to predict voxel-wise absorbed dose map based on pre-therapy PET. METHODS: 23 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RPT were retrospectively included. 48 treatment cycles with pre-treatment PET imaging and at least 3 post-therapeutic SPECT/CT imaging were selected. The distribution of PET tracer and RPT dose was compared for kidney, liver and spleen, characterizing intra-organ heterogeneity differences. Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed to enhance the understanding of the correlation. Two strategies were explored for pre-therapy voxel-wise dosimetry prediction: (1) organ-dose guided direct projection; (2) deep learning (DL)-based distribution prediction. Physical metrics, dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis, and identity plots were applied to investigate the predicted absorbed dose map. RESULTS: Inconsistent intra-organ patterns emerged between PET imaging and dose map, with moderate correlations existing in the kidney (r = 0.77), liver (r = 0.5), and spleen (r = 0.58) (P < 0.025). Simulation results indicated the intra-organ pharmacokinetic heterogeneity might explain this inconsistency. The DL-based method achieved a lower average voxel-wise normalized root mean squared error of 0.79 ± 0.27%, regarding to ground-truth dose map, outperforming the organ-dose guided projection (1.11 ± 0.57%) (P < 0.05). DVH analysis demonstrated good prediction accuracy (R2 = 0.92 for kidney). The DL model improved the mean slope of fitting lines in identity plots (199% for liver), when compared to the theoretical optimal results of the organ-dose approach. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated the intra-organ heterogeneity of pharmacokinetics may complicate pre-therapy dosimetry prediction. DL has the potential to bridge this gap for pre-therapy prediction of voxel-wise heterogeneous dose map.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Superficie , Glutamato Carboxipeptidasa II , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Radiometría , Radiofármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Glutamato Carboxipeptidasa II/metabolismo , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Radiofármacos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate very early radiographic PSMA PET response after one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T radioligand therapy (RLT) of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to assess its role in predicting overall response and survival. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 40 mCRPC patients who were treated with a median of 3 (2-9) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT cycles. Biochemical response was based on the relative change of serum PSA according to PCWG3 criteria, while radiographic response referred to the relative change of PSMA-derived total viable tumor volumes expressed as total lesion PSMA (TLP). RESULTS: After one cycle of RLT, biochemical partial response (PR) was seen in 8/40 (20.0%), stable disease (SD) in 22/40 (55.0%), and progressive disease (PD) in 10/40 (25%) patients. In PSMA PET, very early molecular PR was observed in 12 (30.0%), SD in 19 (47.5%), and PD in 9 (22.5%) subjects. The PSA and TLP nadir were achieved after a median of 1 (1-5) and 2 (1-6) cycles, respectively. Nineteen (47.5%) patients showed overall biochemical PR, 11 (27.5%) had SD, and 10 (25%) experienced PD. In PSMA-directed PET, 4 patients experienced molecular complete response (CR), 24 (60.0%) had PR, 4 (10.0%) SD, and 8 (20.0%) PD. Early biochemical or radiographic response was not associated with longer overall survival (OS). Overall biochemical responders had a nearly significantly longer median OS (22.7 months) than non-responders (14.4 months, p = 0.08). Early PSA progression was associated with shorter OS (12.2 months), compared to biochemical SD/PR (18.7 months, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort, there was no association between early PSMA PET radiographic response and overall survival; hence, treatment should not be prematurely discontinued. In contrast, early PSA progression after one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT was an indicator of overall progression and poor clinical outcome.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Dipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo/uso terapéutico , Lutecio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quantification of [68 Ga]-labeled PSMA PET predicts response in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who undergo PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). Given the increasing use [18F]-labeled radiotracers, we aimed to determine whether the uptake derived from [18F]PSMA-1007 PET can also identify responders and to assess its prognostic value relative to established clinical parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant PC who were treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. We calculated SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA-avid tumor volume (TV), and total lesion PSMA (defined as PSMA-TV*SUVmean) on pre-therapeutic [18F]PSMA-1007 PET. Laboratory values for hemoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were also collected prior to RLT. We performed univariable Cox regression followed by multivariable and Kaplan-Meier analyses with overall survival (OS) serving as endpoint. Last, we also computed a risk factor (RF) model including all items reaching significance on multivariable analysis to determine whether an increasing number of RFs can improve risk stratification. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients died and median OS was 16 months. On univariable Cox regression, SUVmean, CRP, LDH, hemoglobin, and the presence of liver metastases were significantly associated with OS. On multivariable Cox regression, the following significant prognostic factors for OS were identified: SUVmean (per unit, HR, 0.91; P = 0.04), the presence of liver metastases (HR, 2.37; P = 0.03), CRP (per mg/dl, HR, 1.13; P = 0.003), and hemoglobin (per g/dl, HR, 0.76; P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant separation between patients with a SUVmean below or above a median SUVmean of 9.4 (9 vs 19 months, HR 0.57; P = 0.03). Of note, patients with only one RF (median OS not reached) showed longest survival compared to patients with two (11 months; HR 2.43 95% CI 1.07-5.49, P = 0.02) or more than two RFs (7 months; HR 3.37 95% CI 1.62-7.03, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A lower SUVmean derived from [18F]PSMA-1007, higher CRP, lower hemoglobin, and the presence of liver metastases are associated with reduced OS in patients undergoing RLT. An early RF model also demonstrated that an increasing number of those factors is linked to worse outcome, thereby emphasizing the importance of clinical and imaging parameters for adequate risk stratification.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Dipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo/uso terapéutico , Lutecio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
[177Lu]Lu-PSMAI&T is widely used for the radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Since this kind of therapy has gained a large momentum in recent years, an upscaled production process yielding multiple patient doses in one batch has been developed. During upscaling, the established production method as well as the HPLC quality control were challenged. A major finding was a correlation between the specific activity and the formation of a pre-peak, presumably caused by radiolysis. Hence, nonradioactive reference standards were irradiated with an X-ray source and the formed pre-peak was subsequently identified as a deiodination product by UPLC-MS. To confirm the occurrence of the same deiodinated side product in the routine batch, a customized deiodinated precursor was radiolabeled and analyzed with the same HPLC setup, revealing an identical retention time to the pre-peak in the formerly synthesized routine batches. Additionally, further cyclization products of [177Lu]Lu-PSMAI&T were identified as major contributors to radiochemical impurities. The comparison of two HPLC methods showed the likelihood of the overestimation of the radiochemical purity during the synthesis of [177Lu]Lu-PSMAI&T. Finally, a prospective cost reduction through an optimization of the production process was shown.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Cromatografía Liquida , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo , Dipéptidos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internal dosimetry in individual patients is essential for safe and effective radioligand therapy. Multiple time point imaging for accurate dosimetry is time consuming and hence can be demanding for nuclear medicine departments as well as patients. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess absorbed doses to organs at risk and tumor lesions for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T using whole body SPECT imaging and (2) to investigate possible simplified dosimetry protocols. METHODS: This study included 16 patients each treated with 4 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. They underwent quantitative whole body SPECT/CT imaging (3 bed positions) at four time points (TP) comprising 2 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72-168 h post-injection (p.i.). Full 3D dosimetry (reference method) was performed for all patients and dose cycles for organs at risk (kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands) and up to ten tumor lesions per patient (resulting in 90 lesions overall). The simplified dosimetry methods (SM) included (1) generating time activity curves for subsequent cycles using a single TP of imaging applying the kinetics of dose cycle 1, and for organs at risk also (2) simple extrapolation from dose cycle 1 and (3) from both, dose cycle 1 and 2. RESULTS: Normalized absorbed doses were 0.71 ± 0.32 mGy/MBq, 0.28 ± 0.12 mGy/MBq and 0.22 ± 0.08 mGy/MBq for kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands, respectively. Tumor doses decreased from 3.86 ± 3.38 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 1 to 2.01 ± 2.65 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 4. Compared to the full dosimetry approach the SM 1 using single TP imaging at 48 h p.i. resulted in the most accurate and precise results for the organs at risk in terms of absorbed doses per cycle and total cumulated dose. For tumor lesions better results were achieved using the fourth TP (≥ 72 h p.i.). CONCLUSION: Simplification of safety dosimetry protocols is possible for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy. If tumor dosimetry is of interest a later imaging TP (≥ 72 h p.i.) should be used/added to account for the slower kinetics of tumors compared to organs at risk.
RESUMEN
In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT), the recently proposed criteria for evaluating response to PSMA PET (RECIP 1.0) based on 68Ga- and 18F-labeled PET agents provided prognostic information in addition to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic performance of this framework for overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing RLT and imaged with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and compare the prognostic performance with the PSA-based response assessment. Methods: In total, 73 patients with mCRPC who were scanned with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT before and after 2 cycles of RLT were retrospectively analyzed. We calculated the changes in serum PSA levels (ΔPSA) and quantitative PET parameters for the whole-body tumor burden (SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA tumor volume, and total lesion PSMA). Men were also classified following the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria for ΔPSA and RECIP 1.0 for PET imaging response. We performed univariable Cox regression analysis, followed by multivariable and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Median OS was 15 mo with a median follow-up time of 14 mo. Univariable Cox regression analysis provided significant associations with OS for ΔPSA (per percentage, hazard ratio [HR], 1.004; 95% CI, 1.002-1.007; P < 0.001) and PSMA tumor volume (per unit, HR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.000-1.005; P = 0.03). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed ΔPSA (per percentage, HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001-1.006; P = 0.006) as an independent prognosticator for OS. Kaplan-Meier analyses provided significant segregation between individuals with versus those without any PSA response (19 mo vs. 14 mo; HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.95-4.18; P = 0.04). Differentiation between patients with or without progressive disease (PD) was also feasible when applying PSA-based PCWG3 (19 mo vs. 9 mo for non-PD and PD, respectively; HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.03-5.09; P = 0.01) but slightly failed when applying RECIP 1.0 (P = 0.08). A combination of both response systems (PCWG3 and RECIP 1.0), however, yielded the best discrimination between individuals without versus those with PD (19 mo vs. 8 mo; HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.32-5.86; P = 0.002). Conclusion: In patients with mCRPC treated with RLT and imaged with [18F]PSMA-1007, frameworks integrating both the biochemical (PCWG3) and PET-based response (RECIP 1.0) may best assist in identifying subjects prone to disease progression.
Asunto(s)
Niacinamida , Oligopéptidos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Urea , Humanos , Masculino , Dipéptidos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo/efectos adversos , Lutecio , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Targeted radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (zadavotide guraxetan) has proven high efficacy and safety in treating patients with advanced prostate cancer worldwide. Several methods to determine the radiochemical purity have been reported but also limitations in the HPLC analysis due to retention of the sample and tailing effects when using standard gradients containing trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). We here report on the validation of a method for quality control of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T including determination of radiochemical purity, identity testing and limit test for PSMA I&T by HPLC using a Phosphate buffer /Acetonitrile gradient system, complemented with a TLC system with 0.1N Citrate buffer pH 5 as mobile phase including validation of the methods, batch and stability data as well as identification of the main radiochemical impurity by mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The described HPLC method met the defined acceptance criteria in terms of accuracy, specificity, robustness, linearity, range and LOQ. HPLC analysis revealed symmetrical peaks and quantitative recovery from the column. Batch data showed a radiochemical purity > 95% as determined by HPLC, stability data a pronounced degradation due to radiolysis, which could be limited by addition of ascorbic acid, dilution and storage at low temperatures. The main radiochemical impurity was found to be the de-iodinated form of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. TLC analysis allowed to determine the amount of free Lu-177 even in the presence of DTPA in the final formulation. CONCLUSION: Overall the described combination of HPLC and TLC provides a reliable tool for quality control of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. For in-house productions, quality control methods are essential for ensuring product quality, and thus patient safety. During HPLC method development for quality control of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, we noticed an unpredictable variability in peak area and height with replicate measurements. After a run, irremovable radioactivity was measured over the whole the length of the HPLC column, with slightly higher activity at the beginning and end of the column. The uniform distribution suggests that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T interacts with the column. As a result of the interaction, incomplete and variable recovery of injected activity was observed leading to the variability in peak area and height. Therefore the aim of this study was to (1) investigate the effect of sample composition on the interaction of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T to the HPLC column (measured as recovery, peak area, and peak height), and (2) to compare this with same concentrations of the well-known [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. RESULTS: Sample composition significantly affects recovery of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, leading to a change in peak area and height. Recovery was 24% when diluted with 0.1 mM octreotide, 38% with water, and increased to 95% when diluted with 0.7 mM unlabeled PSMA-I&T. Peak area and height decreased to 26% and 17% when diluted in octreotide and to 41% and 29% when diluted in water, compared to a dilution in PSMA-I&T. Further experiments showed that recovery (and consequently peak area and peak height) reached a plateau of > 99% at concentrations of 0.27 mM and higher. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 also interacts with the HPLC column, leading to lower, but less variable, recovery (9%). The low recovery of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 could not be prevented with addition of unlabeled PSMA-617. CONCLUSION: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T can undergo an irreversible binding with an HPLC column resulting in a decreased recovery. The recovery is can be highly dependent on sample composition. The addition of a surplus of unlabeled PSMA-I&T leads to an accurate analysis of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T.