Usability of Patient Education-Oriented Cataract Surgery Websites.

PURPOSE: To assess the web accessibility and readability of patient-oriented educational websites for cataract surgery. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: Websites with information dedicated to educating patients about cataract surgery. METHODS: An incognito search for "cataract surgery" was performed using a popular search engine. The top 100 patient-oriented cataract surgery websites that came up were included and categorized as institutional, private practice, or medical organization according to authorship. Each site was assessed for readability using 4 standardized reading grade-level formulas. Accessibility was assessed through multilingual availability, accessibility menu availability, complementary educational video availability, and conformance and adherence to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. A standard t test and chi-square analysis were performed to assess the significance of differences with regard to readability and accessibility among the 3 authorship categories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the website's average reading grade level, number of accessibility violations, multilingual availability, accessibility menu availability, complementary educational video availability, accessibility conformance level, and violation of the perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust (POUR) principles according to the WCAG 2.0. RESULTS: A total of 32, 55, and 13 sites were affiliated with institutions, private practice, and other medical organizations, respectively. The overall mean reading grade was 11.8 ± 1.6, with higher reading levels observed in private practice websites compared with institutions and medical organizations combined (12.1 vs. 11.4; P = 0.03). Fewer private practice websites had multiple language options compared with institutional and medical organization websites combined (5.5% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.03). More private practice websites had accessibility menus than institutions and medical organizations combined (27.3% vs. 8.9%; P = 0.038). The overall mean number of WCAG 2.0 POUR principle violations was 17.1 ± 23.1 with no significant difference among groups. Eighty-five percent of websites violated the perceivable principle. CONCLUSIONS: Available patient-oriented online information for cataract surgery may not be comprehensible to the general public. Readability and accessibility aspects should be considered when designing these resources. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

The Efficacy and Safety of Standard versus Soft Topical Steroids after Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: Review of the efficacy and safety of standard versus soft topical steroid application after cataract surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The control of postoperative inflammation is the mainstay of treatment after cataract surgery. However, no consensus exists regarding the postoperative steroid of choice. Basing the choice of topical postoperative steroidal treatment on high-quality data regarding both risks and benefits of various drugs would be advantageous for both patients and clinicians. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published randomized control trials that included clinical outcomes of topical steroidal treatment after uneventful cataract surgery was performed. Individual study data were extracted and evaluated in a weighted pooled analysis including grading of total anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, AC cells, AC flare, postoperative visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and rate of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Overall, 508 studies were found, of which 7 were eligible for the systematic review and ultimately were included for analysis, reporting on 593 patients from 5 countries. Age of included patients, when available, ranged between 3.7 and 73.4 years. Follow-up data were available for analysis at 1, 7, and 28 days after surgery. Except for a significantly lower grade of AC flare in the standard steroid group at day 7 (standardized mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.47; I2 = 0%), inflammatory activity measurements displayed insignificant differences at every other follow-up (days 1 and 28 after surgery). Pooled analysis of IOP at each follow-up demonstrated a higher IOP at the 7-day visit in the standard steroid group, whereas IOP at other time points was comparable among the groups. Qualitative analysis of ocular AEs showed similarities among the groups. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study suggest that for the average patient, both groups produce a comparable effect on both AC inflammation and postoperative IOP and VA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Prevalence and Cost of Routine Preoperative Care for Low-Risk Cataract Surgery a Decade after Choosing Wisely.

PURPOSE: Examine the frequency and cost of procedural clearance tests and examinations in preparation for low-risk cataract surgery among members of a commercial healthcare organization in the United States. Determine what characteristics most strongly predict receipt of preoperative care and the probability that preoperative care impacts postsurgical adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective healthcare claims analysis and medical records review from a large, blended-health organization headquartered in Western Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Members aged ≥ 65 years who were continuously enrolled 6 months before and after undergoing cataract surgery from 2018 to 2021 and had approved surgery claims. METHODS: Preoperative exams or tests occurring in the 30 days before surgery were identified via procedural and diagnosis codes on claims of eligible members (e.g., Current Procedural Terminology codes for blood panels and preprocedural International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes). Prevalence and cost were directly estimated from claims; variables predictive of preoperative care receipt and adverse events were tested using mixed effects modeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, prevalence, and strength of association as indicated by odds ratios. RESULTS: Up to 42% of members undergoing cataract surgery had a physician office visit for surgical clearance, and up to 23% of members had testing performed in isolation or along with clearance visits. The combined costs for the preoperative visits and tests were $4.3 million (approximately $107-$114 per impacted member). There was little difference in member characteristics between those receiving and not receiving preoperative testing or exams. Mixed effects models showed that the most impactful determinants of preoperative care were the surgical facility and member's care teams; for preoperative testing, facilities were a stronger predictor than care teams. Adverse events were rare and unassociated with receipt of preoperative testing, exams, or a combination of the two. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of routine preoperative testing before cataract surgery appear similar to those prior to the implementation of the Choosing Wisely campaign, which was meant to reduce this use. Additionally, preoperative evaluations, many likely unnecessary, were common. Further attention to and reconsideration of current policies and practice for preoperative care may be warranted, especially at the facility level. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Cataract Surgery and Cognitive Benefits in the Older Person: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to clarify the association of cataract surgery with cognitive impairment and dementia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The association between vision impairment and cognitive decline is well-established. However, the cognitive benefits of cataract surgery are less clear. Given the lack of cure for dementia, identifying modifiable risk factors is key in caring for patients with cognitive deficits. METHODS: The study was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception through October 11, 2022, for studies reporting the effect of cataract surgery on cognitive impairment and dementia. We pooled maximally adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for dichotomous outcomes and ratio of means (RoM) for continuous outcomes using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined using sensitivity and subgroup analyses. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. RESULTS: This review included 24 articles comprising 558 276 participants, of which 19 articles were analyzed qualitatively. The bias of studies ranged from low to moderate, and GRADE extended from very low to low. Cataract surgery was associated with a 25% reduced risk of long-term cognitive decline compared with those with uncorrected cataracts (HR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.78). This cognitive benefit was seen across various cognitive outcomes and remained robust to sensitivity analyses. Participants who underwent cataract surgery showed a similar risk of long-term cognitive decline as healthy controls without cataracts (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.06). Additionally, cataract surgery was associated with a 4% improvement in short-term cognitive test scores among participants with normal cognition (RoM, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), but no significant association was observed among participants with preexisting cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION: Cataract surgery may be associated with a lower risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, and cataract-associated vision impairment may be a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline. Physicians should be aware of the cognitive sequelae of cataracts and the possible benefits of surgery. The cognitive benefits of cataract surgery should be investigated further in randomized trials. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Subconjunctival Injection as Stand-alone Inflammation Prophylaxis after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a single injection of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with that of postoperative topical prednisolone acetate (PA) with and without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for cataract surgery prophylaxis. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative effectiveness cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2018 through 2021. INTERVENTION: Exposure groups included topical PA with or without NSAID and subconjunctival injection of TA (Kenalog; Bristol-Myers-Squibb) 10 mg/ml or 40 mg/ml in a low dose (1.0-3.0 mg) or high dose (3.1-5.0 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association of postoperative macular edema (ME) and iritis diagnoses 15 to 120 days after surgery (effectiveness measures) and a glaucoma-related event (safety measure) between 15 days and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Of 69 832 eligible patient-eyes, postoperative ME, iritis, and a glaucoma-related event occurred on average in 1.3%, 0.8%, and 3.4% of eyes in the topical groups and 0.8%, 0.5%, and 2.8% of eyes in the injection groups, respectively. In multivariable analysis, compared with the PA reference group, the PA plus NSAID group had a lower OR of ME (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.04; P = 0.135). and all injection groups had even lower odds, with the high-dose TA 10-mg/ml group reaching statistical significance (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.97; P = 0.033). A trend of lower odds of a postoperative iritis diagnosis was noted in the high-strength (40 mg/ml) groups. For postoperative glaucoma-related events, compared with PA, the TA 10-mg/ml low-dose group showed lower odds (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P = 0.001), the TA 10-mg/ml high-dose group showed similar odds (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.70-1.15; P = 0.40), and the TA 40-mg/ml low-dose and high-dose groups showed higher odds of an event occurring (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.98-2.18; P = 0.062] and OR, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.36-3.37; P = 0.001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TA 10-mg/ml high-dose (4 mg) group was associated with a lower risk of postoperative ME and a similar risk of glaucoma-related events compared with the topical groups. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

The Effect of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Differences on Visual Impairment before Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the associations of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) with visual impairment (VI) before surgical removal of cataracts across 2 health systems in the United States Mid-Atlantic region. DESIGN: Multi-institutional cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥ 65 years of age who underwent cataract surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Kaiser Permanente (KP) between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. METHODS: Covariates included patient age, sex, smoking status, surgery laterality, Charlson comorbidity index, and ocular comorbidities. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the association of race, ethnicity, and area deprivation index (ADI) with visual acuity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity before cataract surgery was assessed using logarithm of minimum angle of resolution values. Race, ethnicity, and ADI were the main exposures of interest. RESULTS: At JHH, 11 509 patients (17 731 eyes) were included, whereas KP included 7143 patients (10 542 eyes). After adjusting for covariates, Black patients (ß = 0.49), Asian patients (ß = 0.83), and Hispanic patients (ß = 0.95) were more likely to have worse visual acuity at JHH (P < 0.001 for all) compared with White patients. Similarly, at KP, Black patients (ß = 0.56), Asian patients (ß = 0.70), and Hispanic patients (ß = 0.89) were more likely to have worse visual acuity (P < 0.001 for all) compared with White patients. Compared with those living in the least disadvantaged neighborhoods at JHH, higher ADI quartiles (more deprived) were more likely to have worse visual acuity (ß = 0.27 [P < 0.001] for quartile 2; ß = 0.40 [P = 0.001] for quartile 3; ß = 0.95 [P < 0.001] for quartile 4). No significant association was found between ADI and VI at KP. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults, non-White race or ethnicity was associated independently with VI secondary to cataracts in 2 large health systems in the United States Mid-Atlantic region, after adjustment for ADI. Area deprivation also was associated with VI but only in the JHH system. Our study suggests that non-White patients and those with lower SES are at greater risk of VI secondary to cataracts possibly because of social, structural, and institutional barriers. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Retinal Tear and Retinal Detachment after Cataract Surgery in Eyes with a Previous History of Treated Phakic Retinal Tears.

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and outcomes of retinal tear (RT) and retinal detachment (RD) after cataract extraction in patients with a history of previous phakic RT. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with phakic eyes with RT that were treated successfully with laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy and subsequently underwent cataract surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of data between April 1, 2012, and May 31, 2023, was performed. Exclusions included prior vitreoretinal surgery before cataract removal and follow-up of less than 6 months after cataract surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of RTs and RDs after cataract surgery, along with visual and anatomic outcomes. RESULTS: Of 12 109 phakic eyes treated for RTs, 1039 eyes (8.6%) underwent cataract surgery. After exclusions, 713 eyes of 660 patients were studied. The mean ± standard deviation follow-up period after cataract surgery was 34.8 ± 24.6 months, with a median of 239 and 246 days to a new RT or RD development, respectively. The overall incidence of RT and RD diagnosis after cataract surgery was 7.3% (52/713; 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively), with a 1-year incidence of 5.6% (2.2% and 3.4%, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis identified a higher risk of RT and RD among younger individuals (odds ratio [OR], 1.034; P = 0.028), male patients (OR, 2.058; P = 0.022), and those with a shorter interval between laser treatment and cataract surgery (OR, 1.001; P = 0.011). Single-surgery anatomic success for the RD repair was achieved in 25 eyes (80.6%) at 3 months, with a 100% final reattachment rate. The median final visual acuity was 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/25) for RT, showing no significant change from after cataract surgery, and 0.18 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/30) for RD, a significant worsening from after cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: One year after cataract surgery, the rate of diagnosed RT and RD in patients with previously treated RTs was relatively high, occurring in nearly 1 in 18 eyes. Higher risk was noted among younger individuals, male patients, and patients with a shorter interval between initial treatment for RT and cataract surgery. Retinal detachment repair achieved good anatomic results, but vision declined. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Intraoperative Aberrometry versus Preoperative Biometry for Intraocular Lens Power Calculations: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the published literature to compare intraoperative aberrometry (IA) with preoperative biometry-based formulas with respect to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation accuracy for various clinical scenarios. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed database conducted in August 2022, July 2023, and February 2024 identified 157, 18, and 6 citations, respectively. These were reviewed in abstract form, and 61 articles were selected for full-text review. Of these, 29 met the criteria for inclusion in this assessment. The panel methodologists assigned a level of evidence rating to each of the articles; 4 were rated level I, 19 were rated level II, and 6 were rated level III. RESULTS: Intraoperative aberrometry performed better than traditional vergence formulas, including the Haigis, HofferQ, Holladay, and SRK/T, and similarly to the Barrett Universal II and Hill-RBF with respect to minimization of spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error. For toric IOLs, IA outperformed formulas that only considered anterior corneal astigmatism and was similar to formulas like the Barrett Toric Calculator (BTC), which empirically account for the contribution from the posterior cornea. In eyes with a history of corneal refractive surgery, IA performed similarly to the Barrett True-K and slightly better than other tested methods, including the Haigis-L, Shammas, and Wang-Koch-Maloney formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative aberrometry corresponds well with modern vergence formulas, including the Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, BTC, and Barrett True-K. It has greater accuracy than traditional vergence-based IOL power calculation formulas in eyes with and without a history of corneal refractive surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Intraocular Pressure Spike Following Stand-Alone Phacoemulsification in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

PURPOSE: To evaluate risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) spike after cataract surgery using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with IRIS Registry data who underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2019. METHODS: Intraocular pressure spike was defined as postoperative IOP of > 30 mmHg and > 10 mmHg from the baseline within the first postoperative week. Odds ratios (ORs) for demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and OR of IOP spike. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1 191 034 eyes (patient mean age, 71.3 years; 61.2% female sex; and 24.8% with glaucoma). An IOP spike occurred in 3.7% of all eyes, 5.2% of eyes with glaucoma, and 3.2% of eyes without glaucoma (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses of all eyes indicated a greater risk of IOP spike with higher baseline IOP (OR, 1.57 per 3 mmHg), male sex (OR, 1.79), glaucoma (OR, 1.20), Black race (OR, 1.39 vs. Asian and 1.21 vs. Hispanic), older age (OR, 1.07 per 10 years), and complex surgery coding (OR, 1.22; all P < 0.0001). Diabetes (OR, 0.90) and aphakia after surgery (OR, 0.60) seemed to be protective against IOP spike (both P < 0.0001). Compared with glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertension (OR, 1.55), pigmentary glaucoma (OR, 1.56), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (OR, 1.52) showed a greater risk of IOP spike and normal-tension glaucoma (OR, 0.55), suspected primary angle closure (PAC; OR, 0.67), and PAC glaucoma (OR, 0.81) showed less risk (all P < 0.0001). Using more baseline glaucoma medications was associated with IOP spike (OR, 1.18 per medication), whereas topical ß-blocker use (OR, 0.68) was protective (both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline IOP, male sex, glaucoma, Black race, older age, and complex cataract coding were associated with early postoperative IOP spike, whereas diabetes and postoperative aphakia were protective against a spike after stand-alone phacoemulsification. Glaucomatous eyes demonstrated different risk profiles dependent on glaucoma subtype. The findings may help surgeons to stratify and mitigate the risk of IOP spike after cataract surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Associations of cataract, cataract surgery with dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 448,140 participants.

BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness around the world. Previous investigations have assessed the relationship between cataract, cataract surgery and dementia risk, but their results remain controversial. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the associations between cataract, cataract surgery and the risk of dementia. METHODS: We systemically screened the literature from three electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL until April 2023. The data were collected by two independent researchers. The hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) from eligible studies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted into the risk ratios (RRs), which were pooled using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 448,140 participants reported the associations between cataract or cataract surgery and the risk of dementia were included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes of our pooled analysis indicated that cataract was associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia (RR = 1.24, 95% CI, 1.14-1.35, p < .00001), Alzheimer's disease (RR = 1.22, 95% CI, 1.10-1.35, p = .0002) and vascular dementia (RR = 1.29, 95% CI, 1.01-1.66, p = .04). Cataract surgery is associated with a reduction of the dementia risk (RR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.67-0.81, p < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from the existing studies supports that cataract is associated with an increased risk of dementia, and cataract surgery may be instrumental in reducing the risk of dementia in patients with cataract.

Willingness to pay for cataract surgery and its associated factors in selected medical centers in Urmia, Iran.

INTRODUCTION: Cataracts represent a significant public health issue and are the most prevalent vision disorder following refractive errors. They can restrict the economic, social, and psychological activities of those affected, thereby diminishing their quality of life. This study was undertaken to examine the willingness to pay for cataract surgery and the factors influencing this decision in selected medical centers in Urmia. The two-stage Heckman model was utilized to aid decision-making in financing this service. METHODS: This research was a descriptive-analytical study evaluating the economic aspects of health interventions, conducted from the patient's perspective. In this cross-sectional study, a sample size of 217 patients with cataract issues was selected using Michel Carson's table. These patients were from Imam Khomeini Hospital and Aftab Urmia Surgery Center in 2023. Data was collected using a conditional valuation approach to determine the maximum amount patients were willing to pay, as gathered through a questionnaire. The factors influencing the willingness to pay for cataract surgery were estimated using the two-stage Heckman regression model. The final effect value of each variable was calculated using Stata version 14 software. RESULTS: In this study, 81.11% of participants (176 individuals) expressed a willingness to pay for cataract surgery, with the average amount they were willing to pay being $206.3. However, out of the 217 respondents, 41 rejected the proposed amounts and were not willing to pay anything. The results of the Hemken model indicated that the income of patients and the size of their households significantly influenced their willingness to pay for cataract surgery. However, other variables investigated did not have a significant impact. CONCLUSION: The study results revealed a significant influence of both income and household size on the likelihood of willingness to pay, as well as the extent of willingness to pay for cataract surgery. Consequently, it is crucial to formulate policies and provisions that guarantee access to cataract services, particularly for individuals from large households with low income and high costs.

Retained foreign objects after routine cataract surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Retained foreign objects (RFOs) can place patients undergoing cataract surgery at risk for significant vision-threatening complications. In this systematic review, we examine the characteristics, clinical outcomes, and management of RFOs originating from surgical instruments or the surgical field after routine cataract surgery. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched five databases in June 2023. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed, full-text, English-language articles describing RFOs after routine cataract surgery. Studies that described non-routine cataract surgeries, patients with a history of ocular trauma, or organic RFOs were excluded. Two investigators independently extracted data and appraised the methodological quality of each study using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in our qualitative synthesis describing metal, fiber, and plastic RFOs. Typically, the RFOs were detected during surgery or slit-lamp examination. Presentations of patients with metal or fiber RFOs varied, with some being asymptomatic. Patients with plastic RFOs were usually symptomatic, often with decreased visual acuity and/or anterior chamber inflammation. Metal RFOs may have originated from metal fatigue from prolonged instrument usage and contact between surgical instruments, fiber RFOs from surgical wipes and gauzes, and plastic RFOs from instrument wrapping and intraocular lens defects. Factors such as location, biocompatibility, and secondary intraocular inflammation influenced the decision to surgically remove RFOs. Following surgical removal, the signs and symptoms resolved in most patients with RFOs. The studies' GRADE ratings indicated limitations in risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSION: The presentation and management of RFOs varied depending on the type of material. To prevent RFOs, clinicians should carefully inspect surgical instruments and packs and use fiber-free wipes, towels, and gauzes. Future studies should investigate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different RFO prevention strategies.

Preoperative intravenous mannitol administration and its rationale before cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess the variations in anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AXL), and intraocular pressure (IOP) in both phakic and pseudophakic eyes undergoing preoperative intravenous mannitol infusion. The study was conducted at the Ophthalmology Department of IRCSS Humanitas in Milan, Italy. This is a prospective and non-randomized study. METHODS: 40 patients with phakic eyes and 40 patients with pseudophakic eyes scheduled for cataract surgery in their fellow eye were included. Prior to the surgery, comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were conducted, including IOP measurement, and bilateral biometry performed with Anterion® (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, 69,115, Heidelberg, Germany). All patients received intravenous infusion of mannitol before the surgery. One hour after cataract extraction, the patients underwent the same set of examinations. We analyzed the changes AXL, ACD and IOP in the eye opposite to the one that underwent surgery. RESULTS: The comparison between preoperative and postoperative parameters showed no differences in AXL (p = 0.34 and p = 0.53) and in ACD (p = 0.38 and p = 0.31) in the phakic and in the pseudophakic group, respectively. Instead, a statistically significant difference was found between the mean preoperative and postoperative IOP (p = 0.02) for the phakic group and (p = 0.03) for the pseudophakic group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of mannitol does not lead to any changes in the ACD and AXL, regardless of whether the eyes are phakic or pseudophakic. However, there is a statistically significant reduction in IOP. Nonetheless, it is important to consider the various side effects associated with mannitol infusion.

The effect of uneventful cataract surgery on Schlemm's canal and the trabecular meshwork in cases with pseudoexfoliation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of uneventful cataract surgery on Schlemm's canal (SC) and the trabecular meshwork (TM) in cases with pseudoexfoliation (PX). METHODS: In this prospective study, 37 PX and 37 normal eyes, who underwent cataract surgery, were included. The PX group was further divided into two subgroups: PX syndrome (PXS) and PX glaucoma (PXG). Preoperative complete ophthalmologic examination, anterior segment (AS) imaging using a Scheimpflug camera, and measurements of SC length and area and TM thickness and length using AS optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were performed in all cases. All measurements were repeated at the first and third months after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), AS parameters, SC, and TM values showed no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). After surgery, there was a significant increase in AS parameter values and a significant decrease in IOP values in both the PX and control groups (p < 0.05). The nasal and temporal SC area showed a significant increase in the PX group after surgery (p = 0.007, p = 0.003, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, the only significant change in the nasal and temporal SC area was in the PXS group (p = 0.006, p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery resulted in an increase in the SC area in patients with PXS. This increase may be due to multiple mechanisms including the IOP-lowering effect of cataract removal, change in AS, and removal of intraocular PX material after surgery.

Combined versus standalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation in either phakic or pseudophakic patients: a case-matched study.

PURPOSE: To determine differing outcomes among either phakic or pseudophakic patients who received standalone XEN45 Gel Stent (Allergan, an AbbVie Company, CA, USA) implantation and patients who underwent combined surgery with phacoemulsification. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study involved 180 eyes of 180 participants who underwent XEN45 Gel Stent implantation, of which 60 eyes received combined surgery with phacoemulsification (combined group). Standalone stent implantation was performed on 60 phakic (phakic group) and on 60 pseudophakic eyes (pseudophakic group). The groups were matched in a ratio of 1:1:1 based on multiple criteria. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at the longest follow-up of < 21 mmHg (Score A) or < 18 mmHg (Score B) and an IOP reduction > 20% or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥ 40% (Score C). In all scores, one open conjunctival revision was allowed, and additional repeat surgery was considered a failure. RESULTS: After an average follow-up time interval of 20.6 ± 12.6 months, there was a mean IOP-reduction by 37% among the entire cohort. Comparative analysis between the three groups did not show significant differences regarding postoperative IOP, postoperative medication score, side effects, revision rate, repeat surgery rate or success rate. A dysfunctional stent was detected in eight eyes (4%) during open conjunctival revision in 76 eyes. CONCLUSION: The clinical endpoints investigated did not differ significantly among either phakic or pseudophakic patients who received standalone stent implantation and patients who underwent combined surgery. However mean latency between primary stent implantation and first revision surgery after combined surgery was markedly shorter.

Cataract surgery utilization in Parkinson's disease: the english longitudinal survey on ageing.

PURPOSE: Older adults with Alzheimer's disease are less likely to be offered cataract surgery than the general population, but these disparities have not been examined in the context of other neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Using data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA), an ongoing, longitudinal population-based survey of older adults in England, we examined the relationship between PD and cataract surgery among adults 50 and older. We used logistic regression to measure the association between PD and history of cataract surgery at baseline. In longitudinal analyses of subjects with no history of cataract surgery at time of enrollment, we used semiparametric, discrete-time proportional hazards models to model the incidence of cataract surgery as a function of PD and other time-dependent covariates. Models were adjusted for demographic variables, self-reported comorbidities, and measures of daily activity limitation. RESULTS: We included data from 19,241 eligible ELSA respondents, of whom 231 (1.2%) reported a diagnosis of PD. PD was positively associated with a history of self-reported cataract surgery at baseline (OR 3.66, 95% CI: 2.55-5.26), but this did not remain significant after adjusting for confounders (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.75-1.98). Among subjects with no history of cataract surgery at baseline, PD was also not associated with incident cataract surgery (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI: 0.86-2.02). CONCLUSION: Unlike Alzheimer's disease, people with PD were no less likely to receive cataract surgery compared to those without PD.

Prospective analysis of anatomic features predisposing patients to intraoperative floppy iris syndrome.

PURPOSE: To aid preoperative risk assessment by identifying anatomic parameters corresponding with a higher risk of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) during cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 55 patients with α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist (α1-ARA) treatment and 55 controls undergoing cataract surgery. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), video pupilometer, and biometry measurements were performed preoperatively and analyzed regarding anatomic parameters that corresponded with a higher rate of IFIS. Those statistically significant parameters were evaluated with logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Pupil diameter was significantly smaller in patients who developed IFIS compared to those who did not develop IFIS (AS-OCT 3.29 ± 0.85 vs. 3.63 ± 0.68, p = 0.03; Pupilometer 3.56 ± 0,87 vs. 3.95 ± 0.67, p = 0.02). Biometric evaluation revealed shallower anterior chambers in the IFIS group (ACD 3.12 ± 0.40 vs. 3.32 ± 0.42, p = 0.02). Cutoff values for 50% IFIS probability (p = 0.5) were PD = 3.18 mm for pupil diameter and ACD = 2.93 mm for anterior chamber depth. ROC curves of combined parameters were calculated for α1-ARA medication with pupil diameter and anterior chamber depth, which yielded an AUC of 0.75 for all IFIS grades. CONCLUSION: The combination of biometric parameters with history of α1-ARA medication can improve assessment of risk stratification for IFIS incidence during cataract surgery.

Accuracy of 14 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of 14 formulas in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in extremely long eyes with axial length (AL) over 30.0 mm. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 211 eyes (211 patients) with ALs > 30.0 mm were successfully treated with cataract surgery without complications. Ocular biometric parameters were obtained from IOLMaster 700. Fourteen formulas were evaluated using the optimized A constants: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, PEARL-DGS, T2, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas (SRK/Tmodified-W/K, Holladay 1modified-W/K, Holladay 1NP-modified-W/K, Holladay 2modified-W/K, Holladay 2NP-modified-W/K). The mean prediction error (PE) and standard deviation (SD), mean absolute errors (MAE), median absolute errors (MedAE), and the percentage of prediction errors (PEs) within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, ± 1.00 D were analyzed. RESULTS: The Kane formula had the smallest MAE (0.43 D) and MedAE (0.34 D). The highest percentage of PE within ± 0.25 D was for EVO 2.0 (37.91%) and the Holladay 1NP-modified-W/K formulas (37.91%). The Kane formula had the highest percentage of PEs in the range of ± 0.50, ± 0.75, ± 1.00, and ± 2.00 D. There was no significant difference in PEs within ± 0.25, ± 0.50 ± 0.75 and ± 1.00 D between BUII, Kane, EVO 2.0 and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas (P > .05) by using Cochran's Q test. The Holladay 2modified-W/K formula has the lowest percentage of hyperopic outcomes (29.38%). CONCLUSIONS: The BUII, Kane, EVO 2.0 and Wang-Koch AL adjusted formulas have comparable accuracy for IOL power calculation in eyes with ALs > 30.0 mm.

A survey of intraocular lens preferences of UK refractive surgeons for cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange.

BACKGROUND: To explore intraocular lens (IOL) preferences of United Kingdom-based (UK) refractive surgeons in cataract and refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery. METHODS: An online survey on IOL preferences (and reasons for their choice) in cataract and RLE surgery was distributed. It also enquired about implementing mini-monovision with extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs, about utilising IOL mix-and-match (different IOL types in each eye), and at what level of corneal astigmatism they prefer toric lenses. RESULTS: Following an 81.6% response rate, thirty responses were analysed; median years of refractive surgery experience was 12.5. The most popular IOL choices for cataract surgery were EDoF lenses (30%), monofocals (20%), and trifocals (20%). The most cited reason for each was better overall visual outcomes (88.9%), fewer unwanted symptoms (66.7%) and best spectacle independence (66.7%), respectively. For RLE, EDoF remained most popular (36.7%), followed by trifocals (30%), and multifocals (16.7%) with the same reasons for choice cited above. Mini-monovision with EDoF lenses was well-regarded (83% recommend for most/select patients), unlike utilising IOL mix-and-match (60% did not recommend). 40% prefer toric IOLs for astigmatism of 1 dioptre (D) or higher, whilst 30% opt for them at < 1D. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced UK refractive surgeons prefer newer IOLs with enhanced optics; ≥50% of respondents favoured either EDoF or trifocals for a 'typical' cataract or RLE patient. Notably, respondents have a low corneal astigmatism threshold for toric lenses. Mini-monovision with EDoF IOLs was well-regarded, whilst mix-and-match of different IOL types was less recommended.

Comparing clinical outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens in patients with and without prior history of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

BACKGROUND: To compare clinical outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens in patients with and without prior history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A retrospective study included patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery and PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation. Patients were grouped: Group A for patients with history of LASIK and Group B for patients without history of LASIK. Postoperative outcome measures comprised distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, manifest refraction, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, visual quality, patient satisfaction, and the rate of spectacle independence. RESULTS: A total of 288 eyes (144 patients) were included: 132 eyes in Group A and 156 eyes in Group B. At 6 months post-surgery, patients of both groups achieved a continuous satisfying visual acuity from 33 cm to distance. 73% of eyes in Group A and 75% of eyes in Group B were within ± 0.50 D of emmetropia (P > 0.05). The percentages of eyes within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia were 98% for Group A and 96% for Group B (P > 0.05). The total scores of satisfaction were 52.58 ± 3.46 for Group A and 53.23 ± 3.46 for Group B (P > 0.05). Most of patients (98% for Group A, 99% for Group B) were able to be spectacle independence for daily living. 53% of patients in Group A and 51% in Group B experiencd mild to moderate negative visual symptoms, which made it a little or moderate difficult to drive at night. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract patients with and without history of LASIK could safely undergo implantation of the PanOptix IOLs, which results in precise refractive outcomes and satisfactory visual acuity. Although contrast sensitivity decreased and some negative visual symptoms were observed, patients' satisfaction was generally high due to the high rate of spectacles independence. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups.