Effects of brain radiotherapy strategies on survival in the era of MRI for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the context of the widespread availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and aggressive salvage irradiation techniques, there has been controversy surrounding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. This study aimed to explore whether regular brain MRI plus salvage brain irradiation (SBI) is not inferior to PCI in patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: This real-world multicenter study, which was conducted between January 2014 and September 2020 at three general hospitals, involved patients with LS-SCLC who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy and no brain metastasis confirmed by MRI. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who did not receive PCI for various reasons but chose regular MRI surveillance and followed salvage brain irradiation (SBI) when brain metastasis was detected and patients who received PCI. RESULTS: 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. 55 patients received regular brain MRI plus SBI (SBI group) and 65 patients received PCI (PCI group). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between the two groups (27.14 versus 33.00 months; P = 0.18). In the SBI group, 32 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy and 23 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy + simultaneous integrated boost. On multivariate analysis, only extracranial metastasis was independently associated with poor OS in the SBI group. CONCLUSION: The results of this real-world study showed that MRI surveillance plus SBI is not inferior to PCI in OS for LS-SCLC patients who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy.

Rational and design of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and brain MRI surveillance versus brain MRI surveillance alone in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer achieving complete remission (CR) of tumor after chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is part of standard care in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at present. As evidence from retrospective studies increases, the benefits of PCI for limited-stage SCLC are being challenged. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study was designed. The key inclusion criteria were: histologically or cytologically confirmed small cell carcinoma, age ≥ 18 years, KPS ≥ 80, limited-stage is defined as tumor confined to one side of the chest including ipsilateral hilar, bilateral mediastinum and supraclavicular lymph nodes, patients have received definitive thoracic radiotherapy (regardless of the dose-fractionation of radiotherapy used) and chemotherapy, evaluated as complete remission (CR) of tumor 4-6 weeks after the completion of chemo-radiotherapy. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to two arms: (1) PCI and brain MRI surveillance arm, receiving PCI (2.5 Gy qd to a total dose of 25 Gy in two weeks) followed by brain MRI surveillance once every three months for two years; (2) brain MRI surveillance alone arm, undergoing brain MRI surveillance once every three months for two years. The primary objective is to compare the 2-year brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) rates between the two arms. Secondary objectives include 2-year overall survival (OS) rates, intra-cranial failure patterns, 2-year progression-free survival rates and neurotoxicity. In case of brain metastasis (BM) detect during follow-up, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) will be recommended if patients meet the eligibility criteria. DISCUSSION: Based on our post-hoc analysis of a prospective study, we hypothesize that in limited-stage SCLC patients with CR after definitive chemoradiotherapy, and ruling out of BM by MRI, it would be feasible to use brain MRI surveillance and omit PCI in these patients. If BM is detected during follow-up, treatment with SRS or whole brain radiotherapy does not appear to have a detrimental effect on OS. Additionally, this approach may reduce potential neurotoxicity associated with PCI.

Rupture of a flow aneurysm secondary to spontaneous extracranial to intracranial revascularisation in the posterior fossa following radiation-induced vasculopathy for cerebellar tumour.

Paediatric patients receiving cranial irradiation therapy for brain tumours are at increased risk of cerebrovascular complications. Radiation-induced moyamoya syndrome (MMS) is a well-recognised complication of this. We present a case of an 8-year-old boy with a history of medulloblastoma, who underwent surgical excision followed by post-operative adjuvant oncological treatment. Six years later, he developed cerebellar/intraventricular haemorrhage. He underwent an emergency external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion followed by posterior fossa suboccipital craniotomy. On dural opening, an abnormal vessel was visualised on the surface of the right cerebellar hemisphere, which was not disturbed. No obvious abnormalities were identified intra-operatively. Cerebral catheter angiography confirmed the presence of a right-sided occipital artery (OA) to posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass with a zone of the distal PICA territory supplied by this EC-IC bypass. A presumed flow aneurysm originated from the bypass in the distal PICA, identified as cause for the haemorrhage. We highlight a rare cause for intracranial haemorrhage in this cohort of patients. Children who have undergone radiotherapy may have exquisitely sensitive cerebral vasculature and need careful vigilance and evaluation for vasculopathic complications following spontaneous haemorrhage.

Effects of X-ray cranial irradiation on metabolomics and intestinal flora in mice.

Cranial radiotherapy is an important treatment for intracranial and head and neck tumors. To investigate the effects of cranial irradiation (C-irradiation) on gut microbiota and metabolomic profile, the feces, plasma and cerebral cortex were isolated after exposing mice to cranial X-ray irradiation at a dose rate of 2.33 Gy/min (5 Gy/d for 4 d consecutively). The gut microorganisms and metabolites were detected by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing method and LC-MS method, respectively. We found that compared with sham group, the gut microbiota composition changed at 2 W and 4 W after C-irradiation at the genus level. The fecal metabolomics showed that compared with Sham group, 44 and 66 differential metabolites were found to be annotated into metabolism pathways at 2 W and 4 W after C-irradiation, which were significantly enriched in the arginine and proline metabolism. Metabolome analysis of serum and cerebral cortex showed that, at 4 W after C-irradiation, the expression pattern of metabolites in serum samples of mice was similar to that of sham group, and the cerebral cortex metabolites of the two groups were completely separated. KEGG functional analysis showed that serum and brain tissue differential metabolites were respectively enriched in tryptophan metabolism, and arginine proline metabolism. The correlation analysis showed that the changes of gut microbiota genera were significantly correlated with the changes of metabolism, especially Helicobacter, which was significantly correlated with many different metabolites at 4 W after C-irradiation. These data suggested that C-irradiation could affect the gut microbiota and metabolism profile, even at relatively long times after C-irradiation.

SCF/C-kit drives spermatogenesis disorder induced by abscopal effects of cranial irradiation in mice.

Cranial radiotherapy is a major treatment for leukemia and brain tumors. Our previous study found abscopal effects of cranial irradiation could cause spermatogenesis disorder in mice. However, the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood. In the study, adult male C57BL/6 mice were administrated with 20 Gy X-ray cranial irradiation (5 Gy per day for 4 days consecutively) and sacrificed at 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) quantitative proteomics of testis was combined with bioinformatics analysis to identify key molecules and signal pathways related to spermatogenesis at 4 weeks after cranial irradiation. GO analysis showed that spermatogenesis was closely related to oxidative stress and inflammation. Severe oxidative stress occurred in testis, serum and brain, while serious inflammation also occurred in testis and serum. Additionally, the sex hormones related to hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis were disrupted. PI3K/Akt pathway was activated in testis, which upstream molecule SCF/C-Kit was significantly elevated. Furthermore, the proliferation and differentiation ability of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) were altered. These findings suggest that cranial irradiation can cause spermatogenesis disorder through brain-blood-testicular cascade oxidative stress, inflammation and the secretory dysfunction of HPG axis, and SCF/C-kit drive this process through activating PI3K/Akt pathway.

Survey of treatment and care practices in small-cell lung cancer among German radiation oncologists.

BACKGROUND: The management of small-cell lung cancer shows differences, particularly with regard to the use of radio- (RT), chemo-, and immunotherapy. We performed a survey among German radiation oncologists to assess the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: A 34-question online survey was created and sent out by e­mail to radiation oncologists throughout Germany. The survey period extended from August 2020 to January 2021. The questions addressed indications for RT, planning techniques, dosing/fractionation, target volume definition for consolidative thoracic irradiation, and the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). At the same time, we surveyed the use of atezolizumab. The survey addressed the treatment practice for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) and extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). RESULTS: We received 74 responses. In LS-SCLC, treatment is planned predominantly based on diagnostic information from computed tomography (CT) of the thorax/abdomen/pelvis (88%), PET-CT (86%), and pulmonary function testing (88%). In LS-SCLC, 99% of respondents perform radiation concurrently with chemotherapy, preferably starting with cycle one or two (71%) of chemotherapy. The most common dose and fractionation schedule was 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions (once daily: 62% of all respondents). In ES-SCLC, 30 Gy in 10 fractions (once daily: 33% of all respondents) was the most commonly used regimen in consolidative thoracic irradiation. Only 25% use chemosensitization with RT. The inclusion criteria for PCI were similar for limited and extensive disease, with Karnofsky index (78% and 75%) being the most important decision factor. Respondents use a schedule of 30 Gy in 15 fractions most frequently in both stages (68% limited stage [LS], 60% extensive stage [ES]). Immunotherapy was used regularly or occasionally in LS-SCLC by 45% of respondents, with reduced lung function (37%), cardiac comorbidities (30%), and hepatic insufficiency (30%) being the most commonly mentioned exclusion criteria for this form of therapy. In ES-SCLC, atezolizumab use was reported in 78% of all questionnaires. Half of the respondents (49%) administer it simultaneously with cranial irradiation. CONCLUSION: Our survey showed variability in the management of SCLC. Results from future studies might help to clarify open questions regarding the optimal treatment paradigms. In addition, new treatment modalities, such as immunotherapy, might change practices in the near future.

Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images. METHODS: This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured. RESULTS: The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1 s, respectively. CONCLUSION: DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time. KEY POINTS: • For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. • The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24 s vs. 11 s). • Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility.

Survival benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in modern magnetic resonance imaging staging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients suffering from limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains controversial in modern brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging. To this end, a systematic review with meta-analysis was hereby performed to investigate the overall survival (OS) in these patients. METHODS: Relevant studies from the PubMed and EMBASE databases were reviewed, and pooled hazard risks were obtained using fixed-effects models. The PRISMA 2020 checklist was used. RESULTS: Fifteen retrospective studies were identified, with a total of 2,797 patients with LS-SCLC included in the analysis, 1,391 of which had received PCI. For all included patients, PCI was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.70]. The combination of subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis suggested that the effect of PCI on OS was independent of primary tumor treatment, proportion of complete response (CR), median age, PCI dose, publication years, etc. Additionally, the OS curve of 1,588 patients having undergone thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) as the primary tumor treatment from 8 studies were reconstructed, and the pooled 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of limited stage patients were 59% vs. 42%, 42% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 19% (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.77) in the PCI group and the no PCI group, respectively. Another reconstructed OS curve of 339 patients having undergone radical surgery as the primary tumor treatment from 2 studies presented better results, and the pooled 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of in the PCI group and the no PCI group were 85% vs. 71%, 70% vs. 56% and 52% vs. 39% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.40-0.87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant beneficial effect of PCI on the OS in patients with LS-SCLC in modern pretreatment MRI staging. However, considering the absence of a strict follow-up of brain MRI recommended by the guideline for the control group from most of the included studies, the superiority of PCI to the treatment strategy of no PCI plus brain MRI surveillance remains unclear.

Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation: case series and comprehensive literature review.

BACKGROUND: Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation, so-called radiation-induced meningioma, is one of the important late effects after cranial radiation therapy. In this report, we analyzed our case series of secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation and conducted a critical review of literature to reveal the characteristics of secondary meningioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review by using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google scholar databases and investigated pathologically confirmed individual cases. In our institute, we found pathologically diagnosed seven cases with secondary meningioma between 2000 and 2018. Totally, 364 cases were analyzed based on gender, WHO grade, radiation dose, chemotherapy. The latency years from irradiation to development of secondary meningioma were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between age at irradiation and the latency years. RESULTS: The mean age at secondary meningioma development was 35.6 ± 15.7 years and the mean latency periods were 22.6 ± 12.1 years. The latency periods from irradiation to the development of secondary meningioma are significantly shorter in higher WHO grade group (P = 0.0026, generalized Wilcoxon test), higher radiation dose group (P < 0.0001) and concomitant systemic chemotherapy group (P = 0.0003). Age at irradiation was negatively associated with the latency periods (r = -0.23231, P < 0.0001, Spearman's correlation test). CONCLUSION: Cranial irradiation at older ages, at higher doses and concomitant chemotherapy was associated with a shorter latency period to develop secondary meningiomas. However, even low-dose irradiation can cause secondary meningiomas after a long latency period. Long-term follow-up is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality caused by secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation.

The incidence of radiation-induced moyamoya among pediatric brain tumor patients who received photon radiation versus those who received proton beam therapy: a systematic review.

Cranial irradiation is associated with several adverse events such as endocrinopathy, growth retardation, neurocognitive impairment, secondary malignancies, cerebral vasculopathy, and potential stroke. The better side effects profile of proton beam therapy compared with that of photon radiation therapy is due to its physical properties, mainly the sharp dose fall-off after energy deposition in the Bragg peak. Despite the better toxicity profile of proton beam therapy, the risk of  moyamoya syndrome still exists. We conducted a systematic review of the existing literature on moyamoya syndrome after receiving cranial radiation therapy for pediatric brain tumors to investigate the incidence of moyamoya syndrome after receiving photon versus proton radiation therapy. In this review, we report that the incidence of moyamoya syndrome after receiving proton beam therapy is almost double that of photon-induced moyamoya syndrome. Patients who received proton beam therapy for the management of pediatric brain tumors are more likely to develop moyamoya syndrome at the age of less than 5 years. Meanwhile, most patients with proton-induced moyamoya are more likely to be diagnosed within the first 2 years after the completion of their proton beam therapy.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation effect on survival in patients with small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a companion treatment option for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. However, its efficacy and associated risk factors have not been clearly defined. In this study, the authors aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness and role of PCI in the treatment plan of SCLC. METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched using the following key terms and their equivalents: "brain," "radiotherapy," "metastases," "prophylactic," and "small cell lung cancer." Studies comparing overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and incidence of brain metastases between patients receiving PCI and those not receiving it were considered eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was conducted on the mentioned outcomes with subgrouping based on different factors. RESULTS: The authors identified 74 studies published between 1983 and 2022 with 31,551 SCLC patients, of whom 26.7% received PCI. The studies were a mix of prospective randomized and retrospective observational studies. Patients with limited-stage disease receiving PCI had better OS, PFS, and BMFS than those not receiving PCI. Patients receiving PCI also had significantly longer OS times and developed brain metastases significantly later. However, findings regarding extensive-stage SCLC were not as promising. CONCLUSIONS: PCI is an effective option for limited-stage SCLC patients. It improves OS and PFS, delays brain metastases, and reduces the incidence of brain metastases. However, it might not benefit patients with extensive-stage SCLC under adequate follow-up with MRI surveillance. Finally, the heterogeneity of the included studies and publication bias were the main limitations of this study.

What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer?

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus active surveillance in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation of PCI for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is primarily based on evidence from the pre-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era. However, as MRI accuracy improves and stereotactic radiosurgery advances, the role of PCI for LS-SCLC has become uncertain. This study aims to compare the contemporary survival outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC treated with PCI versus active surveillance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in which 1068 patients with LS-SCLC who achieved a good response to first-line chemoradiotherapy were consecutively enrolled from 5 tertiary medical centres between June 2009 and June 2019. Of these patients, 440 received PCI, while 628 received surveillance without PCI. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two cohorts. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM). RESULTS: In total, 648 patients were matched. The baseline characteristics were generally well balanced. At a median follow-up of 64.5 months (range 2-190), patients who underwent PCI had a significantly lower risk for BM than those who underwent surveillance. The 3-year cumulative incidence rate of BM was 28.2% (95% CI 22.5-33.8%) in the PCI cohort and 38.5% (32.6-44.5%) in the surveillance cohort (Gray's p = 0.002). However, the lower incidence of BM in the PCI cohort did not translate into a significant extension of OS. The median OS was 35.8 months (95% CI 27.6-44.0 months) in the PCI cohort versus 32 months (26.4-37.6 months) in the surveillance cohort (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.10, p = 0.29). Multivariable analysis showed that disease stage, chemoradiotherapy sequence, and response to chemoradiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for BM or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, PCI reduces the risk for BM but does not substantially prolong OS compared with active surveillance. A phase 3, prospective clinical trial (NCT04829708) we initiated is currently underway, which is expected to corroborate our results.

Outcomes of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer in the modern era of baseline magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.

BACKGROUND: For decades many patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have been offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) to prevent brain metastases (BM). However, the role of PCI is debated in the modern era of increased brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) availability. BM in SCLC patients may respond to chemotherapy, and if a negative MRI is used in the decision to use of PCI in the treatment strategy, the timing of brain MRI may be crucial when evaluating the effect of PCI. This retrospective study investigates the impact of PCI outcomes in patients with SCLC staged with brain MRI prior to chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 245 patients diagnosed SCLC/mixed NSCLC-SCLC treated between 2012 and 2019. The population was analyzed separately for limited disease (LS-SCLC) and extensive disease (ES-SCLC). Patients were divided into groups based on baseline brain MRI prior to chemotherapy and PCI. The primary endpoint was time to symptomatic BM. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In patients with LS-SCLC staged with brain MRI the probability of developing symptomatic BM at one year was 4% vs. 22% (p < 0.05), median OS was 55 vs. 24 months (p < 0.05), and median PFS was 30 vs. 10 months (p < 0.05) with and without PCI, respectively. No differences in probability of symptomatic BM and survival outcomes were observed in ES-SCLC. In a multivariate regression analysis, no variables were statistically significant associated with the risk of developing symptomatic BM in patients with LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. For patients with ES-SCLC staged with brain MRI, PS (HR = 3.33, CI; 1.41-7.89, p < 0.05) was associated with poor survival. CONCLUSION: This study found that PCI in LS-SCLC patients staged with brain MRI had lower incidence of symptomatic BM and improved survival outcomes suggesting PCI as standard of care. Similar benefit of PCI in patients with ES-SCLC was not found.

Modulation of the Nitric Oxide/BH4 Pathway Protects Against Irradiation-Induced Neuronal Damage.

The kynurenine pathway (KP, IDO/Kyn pathway) is an important metabolic pathway related to many diseases. Although cranial radiotherapy is the mainstay in metastatic tumors management, its efficacy is limited owing to the associated neuropsychiatric disorders. Sildenafil (SD) and simvastatin (SV) were reported to have antioxidant/anti-inflammatory effects and to serve as NO donor/BH4 regulator, respectively. Fluoxetine (Fx) is an FDA-approved anti-depressant agent and one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor drugs (SSRI), used in neurological disorder treatment. The study objective was to investigate the role of cranial irradiation (C-IR) on KP signaling impairment and the possible intervention by SD and/or SV (as nitric oxide (NO) donor/Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) regulatory) on KP following C-IR-induced disruption compared with Fx (as standard drug).Herein, rats were exposed to C-IR at a single dose level of 25 Gy, then treated with sildenafil (SD) and/or simvastatin (SV), and fluoxetine (Fx) at doses of 75, 20, 10 mg/kg/day, respectively. The body weight gain and forced swimming test (FST) were used for evaluation along with the biochemical quantifications of KP intermediates and histopathological examination of cortex and hippocampus. The results indicated a significant activation of KP following C-IR as manifested by decreased Trp content and increased activities of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) with a rise in kynurenine (KYN) and quinolinic acid (QA) hippocampal contents. In addition, a state of C-IR-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, NO-pathway dysregulation and neuronal apoptosis were observed as compared to the control group. However, significant modulations were recorded after the combined administration of SD and SV than those offered by each of them alone and by Fx. The biochemical assessment results were supported by the histopathological tissue examination. It could be concluded that the co-administration of SV and SD offers a neuroprotective effect against irradiation-induced brain injury due to its NO donor/BH4 regulatory activities, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that modulate IDO/KYN pathway.

Outcomes after first relapse of childhood intracranial ependymoma.

BACKGROUND: Ependymoma is the third most common malignant CNS tumor in children. Despite multimodal therapy, prognosis of relapsed ependymoma remains poor. Approaches to therapy for relapsed ependymoma are varied. We present a single-institution retrospective review of the outcomes after first relapse of intracranial ependymoma in children. PROCEDURE: We performed a retrospective, IRB-approved chart review of patients with recurrent intracranial ependymoma treated at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center from 1990 to 2019. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with relapsed intracranial ependymoma were identified. At initial diagnosis, 11 patients had supratentorial disease, 22 with posterior fossa disease and one with metastatic disease. Median time-to-first relapse was 14.9 months from initial diagnosis (range 1.4-52.5). Seven patients had metastatic disease at first relapse. Gross total resection (GTR) was associated with improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) relative to subtotal resection (STR) and no surgery (p = .005). Localized disease at relapse was associated with improved 5-year overall survival (OS) when compared to metastatic disease (p = .02). Irradiation at first relapse seemed to delay progression but was not associated with statistically prolonged PFS or OS. Tumor location, histology, and chromosomal 1q status did not impact outcome at first relapse, although available molecular data were limited making definitive conclusions difficult. Median time-to-second relapse was 10 months (range 0.7-124). Five-year PFS and OS after first relapse were 19.9% and 45.1%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 10.0 and 52.5 months after first relapse, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Relapsed intracranial ependymoma has a poor prognosis despite multimodal therapy. Novel therapeutic strategies are desperately needed for this disease.

Treatment planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy and positioning optimization for hippocampal-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Hippocampal-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) offers potential neurocognitive benefits but raises technical challenges to treatment planning. This study aims to improve the conventional planning method using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and investigate a better patient's head positioning to achieve a high quality of HA-PCI treatment plans. METHODS: The improved planning method set a wide expansion of hippocampus as a special region for dose decline. The whole brain target was divided into two parts according to whether the slice included hippocampus and their optimization objectives were set separately. Four coplanar full arcs with partial field sizes were employed to deliver radiation dose to different parts of the target. The collimator angle for all arcs was 90°. Tilting patient's head was achieved by rotating CT images. The improved planning method and tilted head positioning were verified using datasets from 16 patients previously treated with HA-PCI using helical tomotherapy (HT). RESULTS: For the improved VMAT plans, the max and mean doses to hippocampus were 7.88 Gy and 6.32 Gy, respectively, significantly lower than those for the conventional VMAT plans (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the improved planning method significantly improved the plan quality. Compared to the HT plans, the improved VMAT plans result in similar mean dose to hippocampus (P > 0.1) but lower max dose (P < 0.02). Besides, the target coverage was the highest for the improved VMAT plans. The tilted head positioning further reduced the max and mean doses to hippocampus (P < 0.05), significantly decreased the max dose to lens (P < 0.001) and resulted in higher plan quality as compared to nontilted head positioning. CONCLUSIONS: The improved planning method enables the VMAT plans to meet the clinical requirements of HA-PCI treatment with high plan quality and convenience. The tilted head positioning provides superior dosimetric advantages over the nontilted head positioning, which is recommended for clinical application.

Examination of the best head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose maintaining a safe level of lens dose in whole-brain radiotherapy using the four-field box technique.

The parotid gland is recognized as a major-risk organ in whole-brain irradiation; however, the beam delivery from the left and right sides cannot reduce the parotid gland dose. The four-field box technique using a head-tilting device has been reported to reduce the parotid gland dose by excluding it from the radiation field. This study aimed to determine the appropriate head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose in the four-field box technique. The bilateral, anterior, and posterior beams were set for each of ten patients. The orbitomeatal plane angle (OMPA) was introduced as an indicator that expresses the head tilt angle. Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to understand the interrelationship between variables (dosimetric parameters of the lens and parotid gland and OMPA). In PCA, the angle between the OMPA vector and maximum lens dose or mean parotid gland dose vector was approximately opposite or close, indicating a negative or positive correlation [r = -0.627 (p < 0.05) or 0.475 (p < 0.05), respectively]. The OMPA that reduced the maximum lens dose to <10 Gy with a 95% confidence interval was approximately 14°. If the lens dose was not considered, the parotid gland dose could be reduced by decreasing the OMPA.

Patterns of relapse following hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation for small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hippocampal avoidance techniques are an evolving standard of care for patients undergoing cranial irradiation. Our aim was to assess the oncological outcomes and patterns of failure following hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) as a standard of care in unselected patients with both limited and extensive stage small cell lung carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with small cell lung carcinoma with a complete (limited stage) or good partial (extensive stage) response following chemotherapy were eligible to receive HA-PCI, with a total dose of 25 Gray in 10 fractions. All patients had a negative baseline MRI brain scan with gadolinium prior to HA-PCI. Patients had baseline and follow up Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event assessments. Following completion of HA-PCI, all patients had three-monthly MRI brain scans with gadolinium until confirmation of intracranial relapse, as well as three-monthly CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Overall and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 17 consecutive patients, 9 men and 8 women, with a mean age of 70 years received HA-PCI between May 2016 and June 2020 after completion of their initial chemotherapy. There were no Grade 4 or greater adverse events. No patient had an isolated hippocampal avoidance zone relapse alone; three of 17 patients had multifocal relapses that included the hippocampal avoidance zone. CONCLUSION: In our series, there were no hippocampal only relapses and we conclude that HA-PCI is a safe alternative to standard PCI in the setting of small cell lung cancer.

Cranial irradiation alters neuroinflammation and neural proliferation in the pituitary gland and induces late-onset hormone deficiency.

Cranial radiotherapy induces endocrine disorders and reproductive abnormalities, particularly in long-term female cancer survivors, and this might in part be caused by injury to the pituitary gland, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of cranial irradiation on the pituitary gland and related endocrine function. Female Wistar rat pups on postnatal day 11 were subjected to a single dose of 6 Gy whole-head irradiation, and hormone levels and organ structure in the reproductive system were examined at 20 weeks after irradiation. We found that brain irradiation reduced cell proliferation and induced persistent inflammation in the pituitary gland. The whole transcriptome analysis of the pituitary gland revealed that apoptosis and inflammation-related pathways were up-regulated after irradiation. In addition, irradiation led to significantly decreased levels of the pituitary hormones, growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone and the reproductive hormones testosterone and progesterone. To conclude, brain radiation induces reduction of pituitary and reproduction-related hormone secretion, this may due to reduced cell proliferation and increased pituitary inflammation after irradiation. Our results thus provide additional insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying complications after head irradiation and contribute to the discovery of preventive and therapeutic strategies related to brain injury following irradiation.