Femtosecond laser semi-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 2-year outcomes of endothelial cell loss and graft survival.

PURPOSE: To assess 2-year endothelial cell loss and graft survival after femtosecond laser semi-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (FLS-DSEK). METHODS: In this prospective and noncomparative study carried out at Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 85 eyes (84 patients) with endothelial dysfunction receiving FLS-DSEK (n=62, 75.9%) or FLS-DSEK combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation (n=23, 27.1%) from 2013 through 2016 were included. The graft endothelial cell loss, endothelial graft thickness, visual acuity, and complications after surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: Thin endothelial grafts were all successfully prepared, with no occurrence of perforation. The rate of endothelial cell loss was 17.4%, 18.8%, 19.9%, and 26.7%, and the central graft thickness was 113±54 µm, 102±40 µm, 101±28 µm, and 96±23 µm at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The median best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 logMAR (range, 0-2 logMAR) at 24 months, demonstrating a significant difference from that before surgery (2 logMAR; range, 0.2-3 logMAR) (T=187.5, P<.001). Partial graft dislocation was the most common postoperative complication, with an occurrence rate of 14% (n=12), and it was associated with an abnormal iris-lens diaphragm (r=.35, P<.001). The other complications included a high intraocular pressure (n=5, 6%), endothelial graft rejection (n=4, 5%), and pupillary block (n=1, 1%). Endothelial graft decompensation occurred in the two eyes, and 98% (n=83) of the grafts survived at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data of the study suggest that the treatment using FLS-DSEK seems to be promising and might be considered a feasible choice in patients with endothelial dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 1. Date of registration: 2021-02-18 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100044091 3. Registration site: https://www.chictr.org.cn/.

Refractive outcomes following cataract combined with lamellar keratoplasty: femtosecond-DSEK versus microkeratome-DSAEK.

PURPOSE: Prediction of postoperative refraction following posterior lamellar keratoplasty is crucial for choosing proper intraocular lens power in combined surgeries. Femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (FS-DSEK) creates thin, planar grafts while microkeratome-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) creates non-planar, concaved grafts. We evaluated whether this fundamental difference affects the refractive outcomes in cataract surgery combined with FS-DSEK compared to cataract surgery combined with microkeratome-assisted DSAEK. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent FS-DSEK combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (group A) compared to 26 patients who underwent microkeratome-assisted DSAEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (group B). Pre- and 1-year postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry values, corneal thickness, central-to-peripheral graft thickness ratio (C/P ratio), and target postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) versus actual postoperative SE were analyzed. RESULTS: Target postoperative SE and actual postoperative SE significantly shifted toward hyperopia in group B, but not in group A. Postoperative hyperopic shifts were 0.14 D and 1.13 D in groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). BCVA improved after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Postoperative C/P ratio differed significantly between the groups and was negatively correlated with postoperative hyperopic shift (r = - 0.616, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery combined with FS-DSEK are relatively neutral, whereas those of cataract surgery combined with microkeratome-assisted DSAEK cause significant hyperopic shift. Clinicians should select accordingly an appropriate intraocular lens power when performing these surgeries.

Femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective study of 6-month visual outcomes, corneal thickness and endothelial cell loss.

PURPOSE: To report 6-month outcomes of visual acuity, the corneal thickness and endothelial cell density (ECD) in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (FS-DSEK). METHODS: This prospective, consecutive, interventional series examined 25 eyes of 25 patients who underwent FS-DSEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and bullous keratopathy. The pre-cut corneal endothelial graft thickness (CET) was 150 µm. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), donor CET, recipient corneal stromal thickness (CST) and ECD were assessed at 1 week and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean BCVA at 6 months was 0.76 ± 0.35 logMAR units, improving from 1.54 ± 0.52 logMAR. CCT decreased significantly, from 759.8 ± 152.4 µm at 1 week to 631.7 ± 79.7 µm at 6 months (P = 0.001) postoperatively. CET recovered to 153.4 ± 33.7 µm (P = 0.076) at 6 months as pre-cut status. The CST decreased from 561.5 ± 96.3 µm at 1 week to 479.7 ± 57.9 µm at 6 months (P < 0.001). Preoperatively, the donor ECD was 2747.6 ± 255.4 cells/mm2, and the ECD decreased to 1729.1 ± 562.9 cells/mm2 at 6 months, for a peak ECD loss of 36.86%. A greater decrease in CST observed from 1 week to 6 months postoperatively correlated with a lower ECD loss (P = 0.019) and a lower preoperative ECD (P = 0.012). However, a thinner CET correlated with a higher preoperative ECD (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: FS-DSEK is a safe and effective surgical alternative for corneal endothelial decompensation. The donor ECD and its changes could be used as predictive factors for the improvement of CST and CET.

Early postoperative results of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in six dogs with corneal endothelial dystrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the clinical outcome and intraoperative and postoperative complications of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in the treatment of canine corneal endothelial dystrophy. ANIMALS STUDIED: Six dogs (six eyes) diagnosed with progressive corneal edema resulting from abnormal dystrophic endothelial cells underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. PROCEDURES: Six patients underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). The patients were examined preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 hours, 7 days, 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery. Corneal edema and ultrasonic pachymetry were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. The positions of DSEK grafts were evaluated 3 months after surgery using optical coherence tomography. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: The degree of corneal edema and corneal thickness improved postoperatively in all the patients (n = 6). Fibrin was encountered intraoperatively in one out of the six eyes (1/6) and postoperatively in two out of the six eyes (2/6). One out of the six DSEK grafts was partially scrolled (1/6). Secondary ocular hypertension was observed in one out of the six eyes (1/6). Corneal vascularization was encountered in four out of six patients (4/6). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty is an effective surgical treatment option for corneal endothelial dystrophy in dogs. Corneal edema resolved and corneal thickness reduced significantly. The early postoperative results are encouraging. Further investigation is warranted to document any long-term complications and to study the longevity of the transplanted grafts.

[Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in failed penetrating keratoplasty patients: graft survival rate and its associated factors].

Objective: To explore graft survival rate and its associated factors of DSAEK in patients with endothelial decompensation after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Methods: A retrospective case study was conducted, including 51 patients (51 eyes) that underwent DSAEK for endothelial decompensation after PKP in Department of Ophthalmology in Peking University Third Hospital from June 2009 to September 2017. The mean recipient age was (43.3±21.0) years. There were 36 males and 15 females. Data comprising demographic details,surgical methods, complications,follow-up durations,final states of grafts,preoperative and postoperative risk factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the cumulative probability of graft survival. Cox regression model was developed to examine for factors associated with graft survival. Results: Among 51 eyes,the overall graft survival rate was 78%(40/51). The cumulative probability was 85% (95%CI: 0.73-0.96) and 69% (95%CI: 0.52-0.86) at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The median survival time was 42 months. The diameter of DSAEK graft and postoperative intraocular pressure correlated with the long-term survival of graft. Larger diameter of DSAEK graft was a protective factor for graft survival (HR=0.29, 95%CI: 0.12-0.73), while postoperative high intraocular pressure was a risk factor (HR=1.08, 95%CI: 1.00-1.16, HR=1.10, 95%CI:1.01-1.12). Recipient age, sex, lens status, the number of previous PKPs and previous glaucoma surgery had no significant effect on long-term survival (P>0.05). Conclusions: DSAEK is an effective treatment for endothelial decompensation after PKP,with favorable graft survival rate. Larger diameter of graft is beneficial to the long-term survival,while high postoperative intraocular pressure is a risk factor for graft failure. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2019, 55: 428-434).

Sheets glide-assisted versus Busin glide-assisted insertion techniques for descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK): A comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The donor lenticule insertion techniques play a crucial role in outcomes following descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and the current study is aimed to compare two of the commonly performed donor lenticule insertion techniques in DSEK. METHOD: Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty was performed in 48 eyes of 48 patients at two tertiary eye care centers from January 2014 to December 2016. At one center (Group 1), 26 patients had Sheets glide-assisted lenticule insertion whereas at other center (Group 2), 22 patients had Busin glide-assisted insertion of donor lenticule. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest spherical equivalent, manifest cylinder, endothelial cell density (ECD) and percentage of endothelial cell loss (ECL) were compared between the two groups at 6 months after DSEK. In addition, intraopertaive and postoperative complications were also compared. RESULTS: At 6 months after DSEK, an insignificant difference was observed in BCVA [Group 1: 0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR); Group 2: 0.50 log MAR (p = 0.74)], mean manifest spherical equivalent [Group 1: 0.64 diopter (D); Group 2: 0.59 D (p = 0.74)], mean manifest cylinder [Group 1: 1.35 D; Group 2: 1.32 D (p = 0.92)] and mean ECL [Group 1: 26.75%; Group 2: 28.76 (p = 0.44)] between the two groups. In addition, the rate of complications is similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both Sheets glide-assisted and Busin glide-assisted donor lenticule insertion techniques are associated with similar surgical outcomes after DSEK.

Outcomes of complex Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty performed by cornea fellows.

BACKGROUND: A major obstacle that academic institutions face is the steep learning curve for cornea fellows initially learning to perform Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of complex DSEK performed by cornea fellow supervised by an attending surgeon at an academic institution. METHODS: Patients who underwent a complex DSEK procedure performed by a cornea fellow during the years 2009-2013 were included. All the surgeries were supervised by the same cornea attending. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative complications and clinical outcomes. Corneal graft survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-seven eyes of 55 patients (mean age 77.5 ± 8.5 years) were included in the study with a mean follow-up time of 16.4 ± 15.6 months. Previous graft failure, presence of a tube and history of trabeculectomy were the leading diagnoses to define the surgery as complex. No intraoperative complications occurred. In 21.1% of cases a corneal graft detachment was documented in the first postoperative day. Mean visual acuity improved from 1.06 LogMAR (20/230) preoperatively to 0.39 LogMAR (20/50, p < 0.001) by the sixth postoperative month and to 0.52 LogMAR (20/65, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up visit. Graft failure rate was 29.8%. Kaplan-Meier analysis found a 67.2% graft survival rate at 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Complex DSEK can be performed successfully with an acceptable postoperative complication rate by cornea fellows during their training period when supervised by an experienced attending.

Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal graft survival rates after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with a glaucoma drainage device (GDD) or medically managed glaucoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent primary PK or primary DSEK. Inclusion criteria consisted of eyes with a diagnosis of glaucoma prior to corneal transplantation and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Graft failure was defined as an edematous cornea with failure to maintain deturgescence lasting beyond a period of 1 month of intense steroid therapy or vascularization and scarring resulting in irreversible loss of central graft clarity. Corneal graft survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients were divided into four groups: GDD-PK, GDD-DSEK, medical-PK and medical-DSEK. RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Among eyes with a GDD, there was no difference in the proportion of failures between PK grafts (48%) and DSEK grafts (50%) (p = 0.90). Failure occurred earlier in DSEK recipients compared to PK recipients, 5.82 ± 6.77 months versus 14.40 ± 7.70 months, respectively (p = 0.04). A Kaplan-Meier analysis did not identify a difference between the four groups with respect to graft failure (p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in graft survival rates between medically and surgically treated glaucoma patients for either PK or DSEK grafts. In patients with GDD, graft failure occurs earlier in DSEK compared to PK.

[Pre-descement membrane endothelial keratoplasty for treatment of patients with corneal endothelial decompensation].

Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes of Pre-descement membrane endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) for treatment of patients with corneal endothelial decompensation. Methods: Retrospective study of case series. The cases of 20 patients (20 eyes) who were diagnosed with corneal endothelial decompensation induced by various original diseases and received PDEK during July 2016 and December 2016 at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center have been analyzed. The participants included 8 males and 12 females with an average age of (59.3±11.8) years. All 20 patients received PDEK operation, the Dua's layer, descement membrane and endothelium of donor tissue were separated from the underlying stroma with the application of big-bubble technique, and donor discs with diameters of 7.75 or 8.00 mm were harvested with scissors. The donor discs were stained with 0.06% trypan blue and loaded on inserters which were then gently inserted into the anterior chamber of the recipient. When the rolled inserted graft was unfolded, air was carefully injected into the anterior chamber underneath the graft so that the graft can attach to the stroma of the recipient. Post-operation follow-ups of over 6 months have been conducted for all patients, the best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), the position of donor disc, corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) were documented. The pre-operation and post-operation (6 months postoperatively) corneal thickness data of the patients were analyzed with paired sample t test. Results: The success rate of preparing PDMEK donor disc with big-bubble technique is 90% (18/20). Eighteen patients (90%) received PDMEK surgery successfully. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) results indicated that sixteen donor discs (16/18) were well attached to the back surface of the recipient stroma, and that two discs (2/18) dislocated at 6 days after surgery. At 6 months post-operatively, the corneas of 14 patients (14/18) turned clear with their BSCVA ranging 0.4 to 1.0, and the ECD was (1 389.3±373.2) cells/mm(2) for the patients with clear corneas. At 6 months post-operatively, the average corneal thickness of the patients reduced to (605±45) µm from the preoperative level of (655±56) µm, and the differences are of statistical significance (t=2.137, P=0.032). Conclusions: Application of big-bubble technique could effectively secure the success rate of PDEK disc preparation and control the loss of donated corneas. PDEK disc can be easily handled and unrolled in the anterior chamber, which could improve the postoperative clinical outcomes. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54: 105-110).

POSTOPERATIVE THINNING OF LAMELLAR DONOR GRAFT AFTER CONVENTIONAL DESCEMET'S STRIPPING AUTOMATED ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY.

- The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative deturgescence of lamellar donor graft after conventional Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). It was a prospective study that included 55 eyes of patients (mean age 70.9±9.4 years; female 61.8%, male 38.2%). Preoperative thickness of lamella was compared with postoperative thickness six months after surgery. Central lamellar graft thickness decreased from 142±27 µm preoperatively to 124±20 µm 6 months postoperatively (p<0.01). After performing conventional DSAEK corneal transplantation, surgeons should expect deturgescence of corneal graft and reduction in thickness of lamellae by about 12% of initial thickness according to our results. We found this information important for better planning of surgical procedures and knowing what to expect after surgery, as well as for better cooperation with eye banks when ordering pre-cut corneal tissue.

[Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty for treatment of patients with corneal endothelial decompensation].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for treatment of patients with corneal endothelial decompensation in China. Methods: Interventional case series. Ten patients (10 eyes) with the diagnosis of corneal endothelial decompensation received DMEK during July 2016 and September 2016 in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Descemet's membrane of the donor tissue was carefully stripped from the underlying stroma manually and cut with a 7.75- or 8.0-mm-diameter donor punch. After stained with 0.06% typan blue, the donor disc loaded on an inserter was gently inserted into the anterior chamber of the recipient. When the rolled graft was unfolded, air was carefully injected into the anterior chamber underneath the graft, so that the graft attached to the stroma of the recipient. All patients were followed up for 3-6 months. The best spectacle corrected visual acuity, the status of donor disc, corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell density were documented and analyzed. Results: At 1 day after surgery, 1 donor disc presented a rolled edge, and repeated DMEK surgery was performed for this patient. The remaining 9 donor discs presented in place well. At 1 month after surgery, 7 donor discs were found to well attach to the back surface of the recipient stroma with normal corneal posterior surface using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The average corneal thickness reduced to (620±67) µm from preoperative (680±78.3) µm (t=2.677, P=0.025). At 3 months after surgery, 6 patients achieved clear corneas with best spectacle corrected visual acuity ranging from 0.4 to 0.8. The endothelial cell density was 1 342.3±436.5 (872 to 1 933) cells/mm(2) in the patients with clear corneas. The average corneal thickness reduced to (612±70) µm (t=2.971, P=0.016). Conclusions: DMEK could improve visual acuity for corneal endothelial decompensation, but there were more technical difficulties in Chinese eyes. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 534-539).

[Clinical research progress in endothelial keratoplasty].

Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has gradually replaced penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and has become the main method for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction in developed countries in recent years. EK is safe and effective and can achieve good postoperative vision. The surgical techniques and postoperative effects have been improved continuously along with the development of microsurgical technology and surgical instruments. The EK surgeries mainly include Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK), which have different characteristics and advantages compared with PKP. In this article, the characteristics of different EK surgeries, postoperative effects and related complications in clinical research are reviewed. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 714-720).

A Detailed Analysis of Individuals Having Graft Failure After Corneal Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with graft failure after keratoplasty, determine the cause of graft failure and outcomes. METHODS: The charts of patients between 2008-2013 in the Cornea Service at Wills Eye Hospital with a history of a corneal transplant before the end of 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Included were patients who had graft failure after corneal transplantation and had at least one year of follow-up after transplantation. Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) patients were analyzed separately. RESULTS: A total of 186 eyes of 170 patients with graft failure after a PK (156) or DSEK (30) procedures were identified. The baseline characteristics included 100 female and 70 male patients with an age between 0 and 90 years (median 63 years). At the time of surgery, 38% had three or more systemic diseases and 68% were using three or more systemic medicines. Mean follow up time for PK was nearly four times of DSEK. Only 2 DSEK eyes (7%) underwent a 3rd DSEK graft, while 47 (30%) PK eyes underwent a 3rd PK and 15 (10%) PK eyes underwent more than three PK procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Most DSEK failures occurred in 1st year, while graft failure in PKs is scattered over years. Failure in DSEK is mostly due to graft or surgical risk factors but in PK mostly due to factors in the host. DSEK does not appear to be as affected by the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics as much as PK.

Endothelial Keratoplasty Following Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience.

Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure, graft survival, rate of graft detachment and/or dislocation, number of rebubbling and/or graft repositioning procedures, and graft rejection or failure (primary and secondary). Results: Sixteen eyes with DMEK and 80 eyes with DSAEK with previous glaucoma surgery were studied. The results were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity were found between the two groups at any stage of the follow-up. Intraocular pressure was lower in the DMEK group at the follow-up stage of 3 (p = 0.0022) and 12 months (p = 0.0480). Visually significant graft detachment was recorded in 31.3% and 22.5% of DMEK and DSAEK cases, respectively (p = 0.4541). All DMEK detachments (n = 5) were managed with slit-lamp rebubbling. Out of 18 graft detachments in the DSAEK group, 2 grafts were observed due to small graft detachment, 6 large graft detachments underwent rebubbling performed in the operating theatre, and 10 eyes needed primary graft repositioning for graft dislocation. Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option to treat endothelial failure in complex eyes with previous glaucoma surgery. In the DMEK group, visual acuity outcomes and possibly postoperative intraocular pressure control were better compared with the DSAEK group.

Pediatric corneal transplantation: techniques, challenges, and outcomes.

Pediatric corneal transplant is a highly demanding and technically challenging procedure for the cornea surgeon in today's era. These cases pose unique challenges in clinical and surgical management. The indications of pediatric corneal transplant can be therapeutic, tectonic, optical, and cosmetic. Pediatric patients undergoing corneal transplants are at a high risk of graft infection, failure, rejection, dehiscence, and amblyopia due to young age, robust immune system, increased incidence of trauma, and compliance issues. The other factors contributing to graft failure can be allograft rejection, secondary glaucoma, corneal vascularization, multiple surgeries, vitreous prolapse, and lack of treatment compliance. A successful corneal transplant in children depends on meticulous preoperative evaluation, uneventful surgery, the expertise of a corneal surgeon, and regular and timely postoperative follow-up. Therapeutic and optical penetrating keratoplasty are the most commonly performed transplants in children. However, with the advancements in surgical technique and management protocol, the current focus has shifted toward lamellar keratoplasty. Lamellar keratoplasty offers early visual recovery and potentially fewer complications. Visual rehabilitation through corneal transplant in otherwise blind eyes can be a boon for the children. Recently, keratoprostheses have been promising in children with multiple graft failures. The current review gives insights into epidemiology, etiology, indications, clinical characteristics, investigations, management options, recent advances, and the future of pediatric corneal transplants. As surgical techniques continue to grow and comprehension of pediatric corneal transplants is improving, we can safeguard these eyes with the best possible anatomical and functional outcomes.

Simultaneous tectonic Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and tectonic Bowman layer transplant for the management of corneal perforation.

AIM: To report the outcomes of three cases of corneal perforation managed with simultaneous tectonic Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (t-DSEK) and tectonic Bowman layer transplant (t-BLT) as an alternative to tectonic penetrating keratoplasty (t-PKP). METHODS: Three eyes of three patients receiving simultaneous t-DSEK and t-BLT for corneal perforation were included. The technique for DSEK was modified depending on individual requirements. The t-BLT technique was standardised using an 8 mm graft and fixated with a running suture. Success was measured by the ability of this procedure to close a corneal perforation. RESULTS: All three cases achieved tectonic eye globe restoration and remained stable during the minimum 3-month observation period. Reinterventions were relatively common: 2 cases required amniotic membrane transplant for persistent epithelial defects. One case required DSEK rebubbling. One case developed angle closure glaucoma requiring surgical peripheral iridectomy. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous t-DSEK and t-BLT may be a useful strategy for the management of corneal perforation as an alternative management to t-PKP for selected cases.

A Comprehensive Investigation Into the Outcomes of Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) as a Treatment for Corneal Endothelial Disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) has emerged as the preferred method for posterior lamellar keratoplasty, as it enables the replacement of the compromised host endothelium with a viable donor lamella. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of DSEK on surgical outcomes and visual acuity. METHODS: The research was carried out from November 2019 to October 2021, encompassing a sample of 18 patients (18 eyes) who satisfied the inclusion criteria for DSEK. The pre-operative evaluation was performed once before the surgery, while post-operative evaluations were conducted at one, three, and six months after the surgical intervention. The main variables assessed in this study encompassed demographic characteristics, visual acuity, surgical techniques, and surgical complications employed during the surgical procedure. The collected data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: Patients in the study ranged in age from 25 to 70, with a mean age of 53.16 ± 14.19 years. The participants were 61% male and 39% female. The main reasons for DSEK use were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (61%) and post-penetrating keratoplasty (PK) graft failure (17%). The other indications were aphakic bullous keratopathy (11%), bullous keratopathy with cataracts (5%), and Fuchs's endothelial dystrophy (5%). The study included 18 eyes: 14 eyes underwent DSEK, two underwent DSEK with small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation, and two underwent DSEK with scleral-fixated FIL. A significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed at six-month follow-up (0.73 ± 0.37 vs. 1.73 ± 0.59 logMAR pre-operatively). During donor cornea dissection, buttonholing was the main concern, occurring 11% of the time. Descemet's perforation and donor preparation thickness variations were also observed. Reverse donor unfolding, incomplete DM stripping, and donor button displacement were quickly addressed and managed. Post-operative graft failure occurred in 22% of cases, while acute graft rejection occurred in 11%. Graft dislocation, pupillary block, and secondary glaucoma each had a 5% prevalence. CONCLUSION: Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty is a safe and effective treatment for corneal endothelial disorders, particularly in cases where scarring is not present. Surgical skills are essential to achieving the desired results. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty is favored over conventional keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction due to its technical advantages and manageable risks. Our research demonstrates a significant improvement in visual acuity through DSEK. Despite manageable post-operative complications, it is vital to educate patients and medical professionals on surgical complexities. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty appears promising for the treatment of endothelial disorders, but its long-term implications must be studied.

Corneal Optical Densitometry in the Evaluation of 2-Year Graft Function Following Endothelial Keratoplasty.

This study aimed to assess clinical application of the Scheimpflug corneal tomography for objective evaluation of corneal optical density in eyes undergoing Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). In this prospective study, 39 pseudophakic eyes with bullous keratopathy were enrolled. All eyes underwent primary DSEK. Ophthalmic examination included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, biomicroscopy, Scheimpflug tomography, pachymetry, and endothelial cell count. All measurements were taken preoperatively and within a 2-year follow-up period. Gradual BCVA improvement was observed in all patients. After two years, the mean and median BCVA values were 0.18 logMAR. A decrease in central corneal thickness was noted only during the first 3 months postoperatively and was followed by a gradual increase. Corneal densitometry decreased constantly and most significantly in the first 3 months postoperatively. The consecutive decrease in endothelial cell count of the transplanted cornea was most significant during the first 6 months postoperatively. Six months postoperatively, the strongest correlation (Spearman's r = -0.41) with BCVA was found for densitometry. This tendency was maintained throughout the entire follow-up period. Corneal densitometry is applicable for objective monitoring of early and late outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty, showing a higher correlation with visual acuity than pachymetry and endothelial cell density.

Two-Step Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome Management: Endocapsular Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Followed by Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

A 54-year-old female presented with complaints of glare and progressive visual loss OS with a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) OS of 20/100. The patient had grade 1 corneal edema with a "beaten bronze" appearance on specularly reflected light, pseudopolycoria, and a nuclear sclerotic cataract. The diagnosis of nuclear cataract and progressive iris atrophy iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome was made, and the patient underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with capsular bag placement of an AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens combined with pseudopolycoria repair using an endocapsular Model A REPER artificial iris. Six months later, the patient was submitted to a Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) procedure, and 6 months after that the CDVA was 20/32 with no corneal edema and normal intraocular pressure. This two-step surgical approach, combining phacoemulsification and endocapsular foldable iris prosthesis placement followed by DSAEK, may be considered a promising option to successfully treat progressive iris atrophy ICE syndrome patients.