Patients report significant improvement in quality of life following hiatal hernia repair-despite recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) repairs have been associated with high recurrence rates. This study aimed to investigate if changes in patient's self-reported GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores over time are associated with long-term surgical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on all patients who had laparoscopic or robotic HH repairs between 2018 and 2022 at a tertiary care center. Information was collected regarding initial BMI, endoscopic HH measurement, surgery, and pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Repeat imaging at least a year following surgical repair was then evaluated for any evidence of recurrence. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Wilcoxon ranked-sum tests were used to compare the HRQL scores between the recurrence cohort and non-recurrence cohorts at different time points. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent HH repairs and had pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Mesh was used in 23 repairs (18.25%). 42 patients had recorded HH recurrences (33.3%), 35 had no evidence of recurrence (27.7%), and 49 patients (38.9%) had no follow-up imaging. The average pre-operative QOL score was 24.99 (SD ± 14.95) and significantly improved to 5.63 (SD ± 8.51) at 2-week post-op (p < 0.0001). That improvement was sustained at 1-year post-op (mean 7.86, SD ± 8.26, p < 0.0001). The average time between the initial operation and recurrence was 2.1 years (SD ± 1.10). Recurrence was significantly less likely with mesh repairs (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in QOL scores at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year postoperatively between the cohorts (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients had significant long-term improvement in their HRQL scores after surgical HH repair despite recurrences. The need to re-intervene in patients with HH recurrence should be based on their QOL scores and not necessarily based on established recurrence.

The role of anterior gastropexy in elderly Japanese hiatal hernia patients.

PURPOSE: As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the "younger" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the "older" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected. RESULTS: The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.

Intrapericardial liver herniation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a case report of minimally invasive repair with 20-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Transdiaphragmatic intrapericardial herniation (DIPH) of intra-abdominal organs is a rare but potentially life-threatening phenomenon often requiring urgent repair. There are currently no guidelines on the preferred repair technique in this situation. METHODS: Retrospective case report with long-term follow-up. We describe a case in which the left liver herniated into the pericardium after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA). RESULTS: Urgent laparoscopic reduction of the liver herniation and repair of the large diaphragmatic defect was performed using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh in a 50 year old male patient. Hemodynamic instability normalized after the hernia reduction. The postoperative course was uneventful. CT-scan evaluation after 9 and 20 years of follow-up showed perfect integrity of the mesh. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic approach for DIPH is feasible in emergency situations provided sufficient hemodynamic stability of the patient. On-lay ePTFE mesh repair is a valid option for such repairs. We illustrate the long-term durability and safety of ePTFE for DIPH repair in what seems to be by far the longest documented follow-up after laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair for DIPH.

Comparison of mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia: a retrospective, single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral hernias often present with incarceration or strangulation that requires emergency surgery. However, recommendations vary regarding optimal approaches for incarcerated femoral hernia. The aim of this study is to compare clinical efficacy between mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center analysis of the clinical data from 48 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia, including 16 patients who underwent mesh repair (mesh repair group) and 32 patients who underwent traditional suture repair (suture repair group). RESULTS: The mean age, body mass index, incarceration duration, hernia sac size, operation duration, and the rates of postoperative incision infection, recurrence, chronic pain, and mortality were not significantly different between the suture repair and mesh repair groups (P > 0.05 for all). In contrast, the female/male ratio; the rates of bowel obstruction, coexisting diseases, and nighttime operation; and the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade were higher and the rate of prophylactic antibiotic use and the mean cost of hospitalization were lower in the suture repair group than in the mesh repair group (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: The surgical approach should be chosen based on the patient's condition. Mesh repair for the emergency treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia is safe and effective, whereas suture repair is suitable for elderly patients, those with more coexisting diseases, and those with limited life expectancy.

Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis. RESULTS: The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%. CONCLUSION: The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.

Predictive value of platelet-related hematological markers in indicating the outcomes after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM).

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of hematological markers in the outcomes after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) remains to be investigated. We aim to evaluate the role of platelet-related parameters after laparoscopic IPOM in patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: The data of 95 patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM for appendicectomy-related incisional hernias were retrospectively analyzed. The complete blood count analyses were measured preoperatively, and the outcomes were obtained from hospital records and follow-up calls to patients. Platelet-multiple-lymphocyte index (PLM), neutrophil-leukocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) values were calculated. The patients were grouped based on the recurrence and the postoperative complications after surgery. RESULTS: Using cutoff values acquired by the Youden Index, we found platelet levels < 212.0 × 1000/µl, NLR > 2.33, LMR < 3.17, and PLM < 365.5 were revealed to be statistically significant in the recurrence of hernias based on univariant or multivariant analysis (p = < 0.05). We further divided the patients into two groups based on the cutoff value of PLM and found that a PLM value < 365.5 was significantly associated with the recurrence of incisional hernia (p = 0.018), the occurrence of postoperative seroma (p = 0.044), and there is a tendency that patients with PLM < 365.5 may suffer from other postoperative complications such as cardiopathy, respiratory infection, and hypoproteinemia (p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: The preoperative hematological values, especially PLM, may indicate the outcomes in incisional hernias after laparoscopic IPOM.

Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of bioabsorbable mesh at the hiatus is controversial. Long-term data are scant. We evaluated the world literature and performed a meta-analysis to determine if these meshes were effective in reducing recurrence. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalKey. We evaluated articles reporting on both Bio-A™ (polyglycolic acid:trimethylene carbonate-PGA:TMC) and Phasix™ (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-P4HB) used at the hiatus. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to estimate the overall pooled treatment effect along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Similar analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes, i.e., recurrence rate, mean surgical time, mean hospital stays and mean follow-up duration between non-Mesh and Mesh group. The I2 statistic was computed to assess the heterogeneity in effect sizes across the studies. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (12 mesh studies with 963 subjects and 9 non-mesh studies with 617 subjects) were included to conduct the meta-analysis. There was one article reporting outcomes on P4HB mesh (73 subjects) and 11 on PGA:TMC mesh (890 subjects). The bioabsorbable mesh group had a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to the non-mesh group (8% vs. 18%; 95%CI 0.08-0.17), pooled p-value < 0.0001. Surgery time was shorter in the mesh group compared to the non-mesh group (136.4 min vs. 150 min) but not statistically significant (p = 0.54). There tended to be a more extended follow-up period after surgery in the non-mesh group compared to the mesh group (27 vs. 25.8 months, range 10.8-54 months); but not statistically significant (ES: 27.4; 95%CI 21.6-33.3; p = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Hiatal hernia repair with bioabsorbable mesh is more effective at reducing hernia recurrence rate in the mid-term than simple suture cruroplasty. Further studies investigating the long-term outcomes and P4HB mesh are needed.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients.

PURPOSE: Obstructed defecation syndrome represents 50-60% of patients with symptoms of constipation. We aimed to compare the two frequently performed surgical methods, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair, for this condition in terms of functional and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 131 female patients who were diagnosed with obstructed defecation syndrome, attributed to rectocele with or without rectal intussusception, enterocele, hysterocele or cystocele, and who underwent either laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy or transperineal mesh repair. Patients were evaluated for surgical outcomes based on the operative time, the length of hospital stay, operative complications, using prospectively designed charts. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with complex rectocele underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, and 80 patients diagnosed with simple rectocele underwent transperineal mesh repair. Mean age was found to be 50.35 ± 13.51 years, and mean parity 2.14 ± 1.47. Obstructed defecation symptoms significantly improved in both study groups, as measured by the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory, Constipation Severity Instrument and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms scores. Minor postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (n = 3) and wound infection (n = 2) occurred in the transperineal mesh repair group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair are efficient and comparable techniques in terms of improvement in constipation symptoms related to obstructed defecation syndrome. A selective distribution of patients with or without multicompartmental prolapse to one of the treatment arms might be the preferred strategy.

Immediate Repair With a Self-Gripping Retromuscular Mesh for Abdominal Wall Defect Following Tumor Resection.

Background: Prosthetic repair is always employed after large abdominal wall tumor resection, while chronic pain is one of the mesh-related complications after traumatic fixation. The objective of this research was to evaluate the outcomes of retromuscular repair with self-gripping mesh after abdominal wall tumor resection.Methods: The study was a monocentric retrospective analysis following STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statements of all patients with abdominal wall tumor >5 cm in diameter undergoing tumor excision and retromuscular repair with self-gripping mesh. Demographic, operative, early postoperative, and follow-up data were noted. Visual Analog Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain), was used to estimate the wound pain.Results: 24 patients were included in this study, and the defect following tumor resection was 26.9±10.0 cm2. There was no tumor recurrence or incisional hernia in median follow-up of 20 months, and the mean VAS score was 0.4. Three had foreign body feeling and no one suffered chronic pain.Conclusions: Immediate repair with a self-gripping retromuscular mesh can be considered as an effective way to treat an abdominal wall defect after resecting an abdominal wall tumor.

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Onlay Mesh Abdominoplasty in Obese Multiparous Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rectus Diastasis.

BACKGROUND: Women with multiple pregnancies often experience abdominal protrusion and/or a lax abdominal wall. Various open surgical techniques have been developed to address rectus diastasis in abdominoplasty, ranging from suture plication to mesh reinforcement. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological changes between traditional abdominal plication and the addition of non-absorbable mesh for rectus muscle (RM) diastasis repair in terms of function, postoperative outcome, and recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This prospective retrospective study involved 63 women who underwent cosmetic tummy tuck surgery and met certain eligibility criteria. Patients with only mild diastasis recti, midline hernia, contraindications for major surgery, recent smoking history, or refusal of mesh augmentation were excluded. Clinical examination for abdominal protrusion or bulging and CT imaging was performed to check for recurrence of diastasis recti. The study included 33 patients who underwent mesh repair and 30 who underwent traditional abdominal plication. Follow-up was conducted after 1 year using CT and a questionnaire to assess various factors compared to preoperative measurements, with overall satisfaction rated on a 10-point Likert scale. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups. Patients who underwent mesh repair had a slightly longer hospital stay and drain duration. The average waist circumference decreased in both groups without any statistically significant difference. Objective CT showed significant reductions in both groups in inter-rectus distance, RM width and circumference, and intra-abdominal circumference compared to preoperative values. All patients expressed satisfaction with scar quality and umbilicus aesthetics, and no recurrence was detected either clinically or radiologically during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive preoperative assessment and imaging techniques like ultrasound and CT scans allow surgeons to detect postpartum changes in the abdominal wall. Mesh reinforcement may be indicated for diastasis above 4 cm in obese multiparous females. Thorough preoperative evaluation permits customized surgical plans to optimally restore abdominal wall anatomy and function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Umbilicus Necrosis During Mesh Repair of Rectus Diastasis for Abdominoplasty: Practical Tips for Prevention and Treatment.

Rectus muscles widened by pregnancy are handled in dramatically different ways in standard abdominoplasty and mesh abdominoplasty. Patients with significant abdominal wall laxity and/or umbilical hernia repair are treated with the use of retrorectus mesh placement. In these conditions the risk of damaging the blood supply to the umbilicus might be greater. Despite the fact that it is of no functional significance in adults, the umbilicus is a key esthetic landmark of the anterior abdominal wall. For both patients and surgeons alike, its absence, distortion, or misplacement after surgery can be distressing and can be a source of frequent patient complaint. Umbilical stalk necrosis represents an underreported yet important complication for patients following mesh abdominoplasty. We advance some recommendations for patients undergoing abdominoplasty with mesh repair of rectus diastasis and/or concomitant umbilical hernia mesh repair via the open approach. This information should help influence intraoperative decision-making to prevent the development of this undesirable complication.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A giant parastomal hernia in a high risk patient: preparation to make surgery worthwhile.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia (PH) is a frequent and well-known complication of stoma placement. Most PHs are asymptomatic and those who are not are usually well tolerated by patients. Thus, watchful waiting is a common practice. Nevertheless, this management policy is associated with a risk of complications and with an inevitable risk of hernia enlargement, complicating its subsequent surgery. Moreover, PH can affect body image and alter the quality of life. METHODS: We herein present a complex case of a 67-year-old man with multiple comorbidities, who presented with an uncommon, below knee, giant PH, which was managed in a two-steps surgery by a multidisciplinary team comprising a senior digestive surgeon, experienced in abdominal wall repair, cardiologist, pulmonologist, anesthesiologist, psychiatrist, dietitian and physiotherapist. RESULT: Treatment started with 8 months hygienic measures comprising smoking cessation, strict control of diabetes and hypertension, a strict diet, and a physical fitness and pulmonary rehabilitation program. Two steps surgery started by colostomy transposition along with pre-peritoneal mesh repair to the right side and the second step consisted of a prophylactic PH repair using a Key-hole preperitoneal polypropelene mesh. CONCLUSION: PH is a common and sometimes inevitable complication of stoma creation. The success achieved by operating a heavily morbid patient, is only possible through the combined efforts of the multidisciplinary team and a preoperative rigorous management.

Anterior reconstruction of the esophageal hiatus: a novel approach for the repair of large diaphragmatic hernias.

Introduction: Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) often require surgical repair. The standard approach, primary posterior hiatal repair, has been associated with a high recurrence rate. Over the past few years, we have developed a new approach for repairing these hernias, which we believe restores the original anatomy and physiology of the esophageal hiatus. Our technique includes anterior crural reconstruction with routine anterior mesh reinforcement and fundoplication. Objective: To determine the safety and the clinical success of anterior crural reconstruction with routine mesh reinforcement. Material and methods: Data were collected retrospectively on 178 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic primary or recurrent PEH between 2011 and 2021 using the above technique. The primary outcome was clinical success, and the secondary outcome was 30 days of major complications and patient satisfaction. This was assessed by imaging tests, gastroscopies, and clinical follow-up. Results: Mean follow-up was 65 (SD 37.1) months. No intraoperative or 30 days postoperative mortality or major complications were recorded. Recurrence rate requiring a re-operation was 8.4% (15/178). Radiological and gastroenterological evidence of minor type 1 recurrence was 8.9%. Conclusion: This novel technique is safe with satisfactory long-term results. The outcome of our study will hopefully motivate future randomized control trials.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OPTIMISATION OF RECURRENT ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIAS ASSOCIATED WITH LIGATURE FISTULA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To improve the efficiency of treatment of recurrent abdominal wall hernia associated with ligature fistula. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: We analysed the results of treatment of recurrent hernias with ligature fistula in 86 patients. 44 patients of group 1 were treated according to the developed algorithm (fistula and mesh explantation, wound debridement, mesh fixation and wound closure with antiseptic-containing polyurethane composite), 42 patient (group 2) were treated according to the traditional one. RESULTS: Results: Decreased rate of seroma formation in group 1 if compared to group 2 was observed up to 6,7% against 23,8% (OR=0,23; 95%CI=0,06-0,92; р=0,038). Wound infection occurred in 1 (2,3%) case of group 1 against 7 (16,7%) of group 2 (OR= 0,12; 95% CI =0,01-0,99; р=0,027). 4 (9,5%) patients from group 2 developed recurrent ligature fistula (OR= 0,10; 95%CI= 0,01-1,90). Recurrence of hernia was observed in 1 (2,9%) patient of group 1 against 6 (17,7%) patients of group 2 (OR=0,14; 0,01-1,21; р=0,048). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Surgical treatment optimisation of recurrent abdominal wall hernia associated with ligature fistula improved the efficiency of treatment, which was proven by the obtained outcomes and relative risk of complications.

Laparoscopic subcutaneous onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia: Our early experience.

Introduction: Repair of the ventral hernia is an ongoing challenge in surgery, and a number of surgical techniques have been developed ranging from direct suturing techniques to the use of various mesh types in different planes of the abdominal wall to close the defect and strengthen the musculofascial tissue. Laparoscopic subcutaneous onlay mesh (SCOM) repair is a novel procedure developed recently for ventral hernia repair. We would like to share our experience with laparoscopic SCOM repair. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective observational study of patients who have undergone ventral hernia repair at Bangalore Endoscopic Surgery Training Institute and Research Centre from June 2020 to June 2022. A total of 20 patients are included in this study. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were entered into MS Excel and analysed. Results: A total of 20 patients underwent SCOM repair with a defect size measuring up to 8 cm × 8 cm and a mean operative time of 117 min. Three patients had seroma formation and one patient had surgical site infection. No recurrence is seen after 1-year 2-month follow-up. Conclusion: SCOM repair is the newer approach to ventral hernia repair with the advantage over open onlay mesh repair in terms of less pain and better cosmesis. SCOM repair avoids intraperitoneal dissection which may lead to visceral injuries as well as subsequent intraperitoneal adhesions. The acceptance of such surgeries would depend on further long-term studies.

Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome: A surgical surprise and management during laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair.

Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome is an intersex disorder which occurs due to the failure of regression of Müllerian structures in genotypical and phenotypical males. It is a rare disorder of male internal pseudohermaphroditism with normal secondary sexual characters and XY karyotype. We report a male patient with the diagnosis of bilateral inguinoscrotal hernia with cryptorchidism scheduled for laparoscopic bilateral transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair with bilateral orchidopexy. Intra-operatively, there was a rudimentary uterus with tubes on both sides. Bilateral testicular biopsy was taken to confirm the presence of testicular tissue and to exclude malignancy and ovarian tissue. Hernia surgery was deferred in the first stage. After 2 weeks, he underwent laparoscopic bilateral orchidopexy with TAPP mesh repair. At 6-year follow-up, there is no recurrence of hernia or features of malignancy in the retained testis.

Emergent and urgent ventral hernia repair: comparing recurrence rates amongst procedures utilizing mesh versus no mesh.

BACKGROUND: The decision for emergent and urgent ventral hernia repair (VHR) is driven by acute symptomatology, concern for incarceration and strangulation, and perforation. Although mesh has been established to reduce hernia recurrences, the potential for mesh complications may impact the decision for utilization in emergent repairs. This study evaluates hernia repair outcomes in the emergent setting with/without mesh. METHODS: An IRB-approved review of NSQIP and retrospective chart review data of emergent/urgent VHRs performed between 2013 and 2017 was conducted at a single academic institution. Six-month postoperative emergency department and surgery clinic visits, hospital readmissions, and hernia recurrences were recorded. Patients were grouped based on mesh utilization. Perioperative and outcome variables were compared using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests. RESULTS: Among 94 patients, 41 (44%) received mesh; 53 (56%) did not. Synthetic mesh was used in 27 cases (65.9%); bioresorbable or biologic mesh was used in 14 cases (34.1%). ASA class (p = 0.016) was higher in the no-mesh group, as were emergent vs. urgent cases (p ≤ 0.001). Preoperative SIRS/Sepsis, COPD, and diabetes were increased in the no-mesh group. Hernia recurrence was significantly higher in the no-mesh group vs. the mesh group (24.5% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.03). No difference was found in wound complications between groups. ED visits occurred almost twice as often in the mesh group (42% vs. 23%, p = 0.071). Postoperative surgery clinic visits were more frequent among the mesh group (> 1 visit 61% vs. 24%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Mesh-based hernia repairs in the urgent/emergent patient population are performed in fewer than half of patients in our tertiary care referral center. Repairs without mesh were associated with over a three-fold increase in recurrence without a difference in the risk of infectious complications. Efforts to understand the rationale for suture-based repair compared to mesh repair are needed to reduce hernia recurrences in the emergent population.

Previous unilateral inguinal hernia repair increase risk of new developed inguinal hernia: a nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study in Asian male adult patients.

INTRODUCTION: Our study aims to identify that patients who received hernia repair previously did have higher risk of occurrence of newly developed inguinal hernia, named as a contralateral inguinal hernia (CIH), than patients who never received inguinal hernia surgery before. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan retrospectively. In the study cohort, 64,089 Asian male adults who underwent primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair during 2003-2008 were included using ICD-9 diagnostic and surgical codes. Another 64,089 male adults without hernia repair history were included as control group via propensity score match. RESULTS: The median follow-up period is 93.53 months. After multivariate analysis, the risk of newly developed inguinal hernia in unilateral inguinal hernia (UIH) repair cohort was significantly higher (adjusted HR 6.364, 95% CI 6.012-6.737, P < 0.001) than the control group. In subgroup analysis, patients without mesh repair (adjusted HR 6.706, P < 0.001) and patients with mesh repair (adjusted HR 5.559, P < 0.001) both showed higher risk of developing newly developed inguinal hernia which needs repair. CONCLUSIONS: Asian men with UIH repair history had a higher risk of developing new inguinal hernia at the contralateral site, namely CIH, than the general population. The surgeon should inform the possibility of CIH after initial herniorrhaphy, therefore, monitoring the occurrence of CIH is necessary.

Dual Tack Mesh Fixation System on a Cadaveric Porcine Model-Creation of a Mesh Fixation System for Hernia Treatment and Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Onlay mesh repair (OMR) has proven to be a widely used, simple, and effective technique for treatment and prevention of hernia occurrence. Despite established benefits, there is still a lack of widespread adoption. In this study, we present the Dual Tacker Device (DTD), an enabling technology that directly addresses the limitations to the adoption of OMR, saving surgical time and effort and making OMR more reproducible across a wide range of patients. METHODS: The DTD mesh fixation system is a semiautomated, hand-held, disposable, multipoint onlay mechanical mesh fixation system that is able to rapidly and uniformly tension and fixate mesh for both hernia treatment and prevention. A cadaveric porcine model was used as a pilot test conducted during a 2 day session to assess the usability of the device and to show that the DTD provided equivalent or superior biomechanical support compared with the standard of care (hand-sewn, OptiFix). RESULTS: Our study included 37 cadaveric porcine incisional closure abdominal wall models. These were divided into four groups: DTD-mediated OMR (n = 14), hand-sewn OMR (n = 7), OptiFix OMR (n = 9), and suture-only repair (no mesh) (n = 7). Eight surgical residents performed device-mediated and hand-sewn OMR. Average time to completion was fastest in the DTD cohort (45.6s) with a statistically significant difference compared with the hand-sewn cohort (343.1s, P < 0.01). No difference in tensile strength was noted between DTD (195.32N), hand-sewn (200.48N), and OptiFix (163.23N). Discreet hand movements were smallest in the DTD (29N) and significant (P < 0.01) when compared with hand-sewn (202N) and OptiFix (35N). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the DTD is not only feasible, but demonstrated improvement in time to completion and economy of movement over current standard of care. While more testing is needed and planned, compared with conventional approaches, the DTD represents a robust proof of principle with promising implications for clinical feasibility and adoptability.

Women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and levator ani muscle avulsion would significantly benefit from mesh repair surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Mesh repair surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been suspended in some countries owing to concerns about its associated complications. However, mesh repair has been shown to reduce the risk of prolapse recurrence after surgery. In view of this controversy, our aim was to assess the incidence of subjective and objective recurrence of POP following mesh repair surgery vs native-tissue repair in women with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women who presented with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP and received primary prolapse surgery between 2013 and 2018. Transperineal ultrasound was performed before the operation and volumes were analyzed offline to assess the presence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion. All women were counseled on either mesh repair or native-tissue reconstruction. The mesh-repair group was followed up for up to 5 years and the native-tissue-repair group for up to 2 years after the operation. Prolapse symptoms and POP quantification (POP-Q) staging were assessed at follow-up. Subjective recurrence of POP was defined as symptoms of prolapse (vaginal bulge sensation or dragging sensation) reported by the patient. Objective recurrence was defined as POP-Q ≥ Stage II. The subjective and objective recurrences of prolapse were compared between women with and those without mesh use. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for the recurrence of POP. RESULTS: A total of 154 Chinese women with Stage-III or Stage-IV prolapse were recruited. Of these, 104 (67.5%) underwent mesh repair (transabdominal in 57 women and transvaginal in 47 women) and 50 (32.5%) had native-tissue repair surgery. Ninety-five (61.7%) women had LAM avulsion. Both the subjective POP recurrence rate (4.8% vs 20.0%; P = 0.003) and the objective recurrence rate (20.2% vs 46.0%; P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the mesh-repair group than in the native-tissue-repair group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, mesh repair was associated significantly with a reduced risk of subjective recurrence (odds ratio (OR), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07-0.63)) and of objective recurrence (OR, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.55)) of prolapse. On subgroup analysis of women with LAM avulsion, mesh repair significantly reduced the risk of subjective recurrence (OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.07-0.87)) and objective recurrence (OR, 0.23 (95% CI, 0.09-0.57)) of POP. The incidence of mesh-related complications was low, and mesh exposure could be treated conservatively or by minor surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh repair surgery, compared with native-tissue repair, was associated with a 5-fold reduction in the risk of subjective recurrence and a 6-fold reduction in the risk of objective recurrence of prolapse in women with Stage-III or Stage-IV POP. In women with concomitant LAM avulsion, mesh repair surgery was associated with a 4-fold reduction in both objective and subjective recurrence of POP. The rate of mesh-related complications was low, and mesh exposure could be treated conservatively or by minor surgery. The benefit of mesh surgery for these high-risk women appears to outweigh the risks of mesh complications, and it could be a treatment option for this group of women. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.