Comparative effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab on asthma exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid prescriptions: Real-world US ADVANTAGE study.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, and omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma in patients in the United States. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify patients with asthma age ≥12 years who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020 and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: All inclusion and exclusion criteria were met by 2138 dupilumab patients and 1313 omalizumab patients. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the 2 groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (P < .0001) versus omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (P < .05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared with omalizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared with patients prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.

The immune-related adverse events paradox in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer after atezolizumab immunotherapy: analysis of individual patient data from IMvigor210 and IMvigor211 trials.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and whether the administration of systemic corticosteroids diminishes therapeutic impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The association between irAEs occurrence and clinical progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was tested by means of multivariable Cox or competing-risks regression, when appropriate. Patients experiencing irAEs were further stratified based on systemic corticosteroids administration. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by repeating all the analyses with median time to irAE as landmark point. RESULTS: We relied on individual participant data from two prospective trials for advanced urothelial cancer: IMvigor210 and IMvigor211. A total of 896 patients who received atezolizumab for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer were considered. Overall, irAEs were recorded in 195 patients and the median time to irAEs was 64 days. On multivariable analysis, irAEs were inversely associated with the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.61; P < 0.001), overall mortality (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.64; P < 0.001), and cancer-specific mortality (subdistributional HR [sHR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.72; P < 0.001). Moreover, our results did not refute the supposition that the administration of systemic corticosteroids does not impact oncological outcomes (PFS: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, P = 0.629; OS: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51-1.64, P = 0.613; CSS: sHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.36, P = 0.630). The sensitivity analysis confirmed our findings. CONCLUSIONS: The development of irAEs while receiving atezolizumab treatment was associated with improved oncological outcomes, namely overall and cancer-specific mortality, and PFS. These findings seem to not be substantially affected by administration of systemic corticosteroids.

Introducing the concept of loss of corticosteroid credit in asthma.

The widespread use of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) in asthma is associated with significant comorbidities and mortality. A dose-response relationship for cumulative SCS exposure with most adverse outcomes began at cumulative exposures of 1.0-<2.5 g, equivalent to four lifetime SCS courses. The purpose of creating the SCS credit concept was to increase awareness of the risks of SCS exposure and to promote better therapeutic alternatives. Consuming the lifetime SCS credit of 1.5 g/yr significantly increased morbidity and mortality.

Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP. METHODS: A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events. CONCLUSION: The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

A real life cohort of Mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma.

Summary: Background. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that interacts with IL-5, was the first anti-IL-5 approved for uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma. In several randomised, placebo-controlled trials, treatment with mepolizumab has shown a significant improvement in asthma symptoms and the need to use of oral corticosteroids (OCS). Several studies have correlated blood levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) with the degree of eosinophilic inflammation, which could make it an indirect marker of eosinophilic activity. Methods. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included all patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma under treatment with mepolizumab. We recorded the number of exacerbations, daily prednisone intake, asthma control test scores and forced expiratory volume in the first second. Results. We followed 22 patients, 14 of whom were OCS-dependent with a mean daily dose of 15.85 ± 15.62 mg prednisone. After 12 months, only five continued taking OCS and the mean daily dose was reduced by up to 2.50 ± 3.84 mg (p less than 0.007). The exacerbation rate at baseline was 2.91 ± 2.27 and decreased to 0.82 ± 1.14 in the following year (p less than 0.001). ACT scores increased significantly from 16.00 ± 5.85 to 20.71 ± 4.45 after six months (p = 0.003). We also observed a decrease in ECP from 81.46 ± 43.99 µg/L to 19.12 ± 18.80 µg/L (p > 0.001). Conclusions. These real-life results are consistent with previous clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in routine clinical practice for severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. We observed a significant decrease in blood eosinophil counts and in ECP levels, suggesting a reduction in eosinophil activity following mepolizumab treatment.

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis, severity, and treatment responsiveness of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab-mediated eosinophil depletion for treating CRSwNP. METHODS: The phase 3 OSTRO study enrolled patients with severe CRSwNP who were symptomatic despite treatment with intranasal corticosteroids and who had a history of systemic corticosteroid (SCS) use and/or surgery for nasal polyps (NP). Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with benralizumab 30 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses and every 8 weeks thereafter. Coprimary end points were change from baseline to week 40 in NP score (NPS) and patient-reported mean nasal blockage score reported once every 2 weeks. RESULTS: The study population comprised 413 randomized patients (207 in the benralizumab group and 206 in the placebo group). Benralizumab significantly improved NPS and nasal blockage score compared to placebo at week 40 (P ≤ .005). Improvements in Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 score at week 40, time to first NP surgery and/or SCS use for NP, and time to first NP surgery were not statistically significant between treatment groups. Nominal significance was obtained for improvement in difficulty in sense of smell score at week 40 (P = .003). Subgroup analyses suggested influences of comorbid asthma, number of NP surgeries, sex, body mass index, and baseline blood eosinophil count on treatment effects. Benralizumab was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Benralizumab, when added to standard-of-care therapy, reduced NPS, decreased nasal blockage, and reduced difficulty with sense of smell compared to placebo in patients with CRSwNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03401229.

Efficacy of narrow band UVB with or without OMP in stabilization of vitiligo activity in skin photo-types (III-V): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: NB-UVB has long been the vitiligo management pillar with capability of achieving the main treatment outcomes; repigmentation and stabilization. Its stabilizing effect in dark skin has been debatable. However, randomized controlled trials regarding NB-UVB ability to control disease activity are lacking. PURPOSE: To assess stabilizing effect of NB-UVB in comparison to systemic corticosteroids, the mainstay in vitiligo stabilization, in skin photo-types (III-V). METHODS: This is a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, prospective study. Eighty patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo (NSV) (Vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) ≥2) were randomized to either NB-UVB and placebo (NB-placebo) or NB-UVB and dexamethasone oral mini-pulse (OMP) therapy (NB-OMP) for 6 months. Sixty four patients completed the study, 34 in the NB-OMP group and 30 in the NB-placebo group. Patients were evaluated fortnightly according to presence or absence of symptoms/signs of activity. RESULTS: In spite of earlier control of disease activity observed in the NB-OMP group, it was comparable in both groups by the end of the study period. Disease activity prior to therapy, but not extent, was found to influence control of activity in both groups. Thus, NB-UVB is a safe sole therapeutic tool in vitiligo management. Not only does it efficiently achieve repigmentation, but also it is a comparable stabilizing tool for systemic corticosteroids in spite of slightly delayed control. CONCLUSION: NB-UVB is the only well-established vitiligo therapy that can be used solely whenever corticosteroids are contraindicated or immune-suppression is unjustified. Nonetheless, its combination with corticosteroids expedites response and improves compliance.

COVID-19 risk and outcomes in adult asthmatic patients treated with biologics or systemic corticosteroids: Nationwide real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Managing severe asthma during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is challenging, particularly due to safety concerns regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids and biologics. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the association between biologics or systemic corticosteroids use and PCR positivity for SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes among asthmatic patients. METHODS: We used the computerized database of Clalit Health Services, the largest health care provider in Israel, to identify all asthmatic adult patients who underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, between March 1, 2020, and December 7, 2020. A cohort approach was used to assess the association between biologics use and steroids treatment and COVID-19 severity and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 8,242 of 80,602 tested asthmatic patients had positive PCR testing result for SARS-CoV-2. Both biologics and systemic corticosteroids were not associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multivariate analyses revealed that biologics were not associated with a significantly increased risk of moderate to severe COVID-19, nor with the composite end point of moderate to severe COVID-19 or all-cause mortality within 90 days. Chronic systemic corticosteroid use was associated with significantly increased risk of all tested outcome. Recent (within the previous 120 days) systemic corticosteroid use, but not former use, was significantly associated with increased risk of both moderate to severe COVID-19 and the composite of moderate to severe COVID-19 or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics approved for asthma and systemic corticosteroids are not associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In contrast, systemic corticosteroids are an independent risk factor for worst COVID-19 severity and all-cause mortality. Our findings underscore the risk of recent or current exposure to systemic corticosteroids in asthmatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Use of systemic steroids during pulmonary exacerbations in children and adolescent with Cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of systemic steroids in cystic fibrosis patients and its effects on pulmonary exacerbation in children and adolescents. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data from January 2015 to December 2019 of cystic fibrosis patients aged 3-18 years hospitalised with pulmonary exacerbations. The patients were divided into systemic steroid group A and non-systemic steroid group B. Patients in group A received parenteral steroids during acute exacerbation of cystic fibrosis in the first two weeks of admission, while those in group B did not receive systemic steroids. Length of hospital stay and number of days on oxygen support were compared between the groups. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 124 patient charts evaluated, 84(67.7%) were included; 40(47.6%) in group A and 44(52.4%) in group B. There were no significant differences between the groups related to age, age at diagnosis, weight, height, and pulmonary exacerbations (p>0.05). Group A had significantly fewer days on oxygen support compared to group B (p<0.001), but there was inter-group difference in mean length of hospital stay (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic steroid usage during hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of cystic fibrosis was associated with decreased duration of oxygen requirement with standard treatment.

Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Experience of a Hospital in Mexico City. / Tratamiento con inmunoglobulina intravenosa y esteroides sistémicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica: Experiencia en un hospital en Ciudad de México.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is the most serious mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction. Multidisciplinary treatment and withdrawal of the causative drug are key to reducing mortality. Few studies have analyzed the use of systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis in Latin America. We describe our experience with 6 cases treated at a dermatology referral hospital in Mexico City. None of the patients died or developed complications in the short or medium term. The most widely used regimen was a combination of IVIG 1 g/kg for 3 to 5 days and methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 to 5 days. Mean hospital stay was 14.8 days. The combined use of systemic corticosteroids and IVIG seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Clinical characteristics and drug susceptibility patterns of Corynebacterium species in bacteremic patients with hematological disorders.

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical and microbiological characteristics of Corynebacterium bacteremia in hematological patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with Corynebacterium bacteremia from April 2013 to June 2018. The causative Corynebacterium species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Drug susceptibility tests were performed using the broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In total, 147 cases of Corynebacterium bacteremia were identified during the study period. Corynebacterium striatum was the most frequent pathogen. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 19.7% of all patients, and moderate/severe oral or severe gastrointestinal mucosal impairment was detected in 19.7%. Polymicrobial infection was found in about 20% of cases, with Enterococcus faecium being the most frequent isolate. The overall 30-day mortality was 34.7% (51/147). Multivariate analysis showed that E. faecium co-infection (odds ratio (OR) 9.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-40), systemic corticosteroids (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.4-8.9), other immunosuppressive drugs (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13-0.76), and a Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (OR 12; 95% CI 3.9-40) were significant risk factors for overall 30-day mortality. The drug susceptibility rates for beta-lactam antimicrobial agents were quite low. All isolates were susceptible to glycopeptides and linezolid. However, some C. striatum isolates were resistant to daptomycin. Corynebacterium bacteremia can occur in the presence of several types of mucosal impairment. Our drug susceptibility data indicate that Corynebacterium bacteremia in hematological patients could be treated by glycopeptides or linezolid.

Reducing the hidden burden of severe asthma: recognition and referrals from primary practice.

Since their introduction many decades ago, systemic corticosteroids have become a mainstay treatment for asthma. Despite being a highly effective therapy, corticosteroids can cause significant adverse effects in patients. This results in a "double hit" for some patients as they suffer the burden of disease as well as the burden of treatment-induced morbidity.This article aims to raise awareness of the potential, harmful side effects of prolonged or repeated exposure to systemic corticosteroids in asthma. It also highlights the importance of referral of the appropriate patients with asthma from primary care for specialist assessment once other considerations such as adherence, inhaler technique and co-morbidity have been evaluated. We propose a simple decision step that may help busy primary care physicians and general practitioners to identify patients who could benefit from specialist assessment.Our decision step suggests that a patient with asthma should be reviewed at least once by an asthma specialist if he/she (i) has received ≥2 courses of oral corticosteroids in the previous year; asthma remains uncontrolled despite good adherence and inhaler technique; or (ii) has attended an emergency department or was hospitalized for asthma care.Such referral could facilitate wider access to diagnostic tools, in-depth assessment of confounding comorbidities, and non-corticosteroid-based therapies as needed, which may be unavailable in primary practice.

Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients with Bronchial Asthma: A Real-Life Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to determine the use of systemic corti-costeroids (SCs) in patients with bronchial asthma using big data analysis. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, noninterventional study based on secondary data captured from free text in the electronic health records. This study was per-formed based on data from the regional health service of Castille-La Mancha (SESCAM), Spain. We performed the analysis using big data and artificial intelligence via Savana® Manager version 3.0. RESULTS: During the study period, 103 667 patients were diagnosed with and treated for asthma at different care levels. The search was restricted to patients aged 10 to 90 years (mean age, 43.5 [95%CI, 43.4-43.7] years). Of these, 59.8% were women. SCs were taken for treatment of asthma by 58 745 patients at some point during the study period. These patients were older, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, ob-esity, depression, and hiatus hernia. SCs are used frequently in the general population with asthma (31.4% in 2015 and 39.6% in 2019). SCs were prescribed mainly in primary care (59%), allergy (13%) and pulmonology (20%). The frequency of prescription of SCs had a direct impact on the main associated adverse effects. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, SCs are frequently prescribed to patients with asthma, especially in primary care. Use of SCs is associated with a greater number of adverse events. It is necessary to implement measures to reduce prescription of SCs to patients with asthma, especially in primary care.

Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management.

Systemic corticosteroid use to manage uncontrolled asthma and its associated healthcare burden may account for important health-related adverse effects. We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the real-world extent and burden of systemic corticosteroid use in asthma. We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify English-language articles published in 2010-2017, using search terms for asthma with keywords for oral corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids. Observational studies, prescription database analyses, economic analyses, and surveys on oral/systemic corticosteroid use in children (>5 yr old), adolescents (12-17 yr old), and adults with asthma were included. We identified and reviewed 387 full-text articles, and our review included data from 139 studies. The included studies were conducted in Europe, North America, and Asia. Overall, oral/systemic corticosteroids were commonly used for asthma management and were more frequently used in patients with severe asthma than in those with milder disease. Long-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use was, in general, less frequent than short-term use. Compared with no use, long-term and repeated short-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use were associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic adverse events, even when doses were comparatively low. Greater oral/systemic corticosteroid exposure was also associated with increased costs and healthcare resource use. This review provides a comprehensive overview of oral/systemic corticosteroid use and associated adverse events for patients with all degrees of asthma severity and exposure duration. We report that oral/systemic corticosteroid use is prevalent in asthma management, and the risks of acute and chronic complications increase with the cumulative oral corticosteroid dosage.

Mucormycosis and COVID-19: An epidemic within a pandemic in India.

IMPORTANCE: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) causes an immunosuppressed state and increases risk of secondary infections like mucormycosis. We evaluated clinical features, predisposing factors, diagnosis and outcomes for mucormycosis among patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multi-centre study included 47 consecutive patients with mucormycosis, diagnosed during their course of COVID-19 illness, between January 3 and March 27, 2021. Data regarding demography, underlying medical conditions, COVID-19 illness and treatment were collected. Clinical presentations of mucormycosis, imaging and biochemical characteristics and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 2567 COVID-19 patients admitted to 3 tertiary centres, 47 (1.8%) were diagnosed with mucormycosis. Mean age was 55 ± 12.8years, and majority suffered from diabetes mellitus (n = 36, 76.6%). Most were not COVID-19 vaccinated (n = 31, 66.0%) and majority (n = 43, 91.5%) had developed moderate-to-severe pneumonia, while 20 (42.6%) required invasive ventilation. All patients had received corticosteroids and broad-spectrum antibiotics while most (n = 37, 78.7%) received at least one anti-viral medication. Mean time elapsed from COVID-19 diagnosis to mucormycosis was 12.1 ± 4.6days. Eleven (23.4%) subjects succumbed to their disease, mostly (n = 8, 72.7%) within 7 days of diagnosis. Among the patients who died, 10 (90.9%) had pre-existing diabetes mellitus, only 2 (18.2%) had received just one vaccine dose and all developed moderate-to-severe pneumonia, requiring oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Mucormycosis can occur among COVID-19 patients, especially with poor glycaemic control, widespread and injudicious use of corticosteroids and broad-spectrum antibiotics, and invasive ventilation. Owing to the high mortality, high index of suspicion is required to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment in high-risk populations.

Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Incidence, clinical patterns, causative drugs and modalities of treatment in Assiut University Hospital, Upper Egypt.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and overlap SJS/TEN are life-threatening diseases that are most frequently caused by drugs. Much debate remains about the role of systemic corticosteroids (SCs) in their treatment. Our aim to determine the incidence, causative drugs, the role and side effects of SCs in severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), in Assiut University Hospital (AUH). Patients This study was conducted in Department of Dermatology at AUH, from 2012 to 2017. All patients with SJS, overlap SJS/TEN and TEN admitted during this period were included in the study. Eighty-three patients with SCARs were included in this study. The most common type was SJS (67.5%). The incidence ranged from 1.7% in 2012 to 7.7% in 2017. Carbamazepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, diclofenac sodium, and flucloxacillin-amoxicillin were the most common causative drugs. The most common side effects of SCs were peptic ulcer (55.5%) and hypertension (51.8%). The mortality rate in patients treated with SCs was 100% in TEN, 33.3% in overlap SJS/TEN and 16.3% in SJS. The patients of SCARs must be aware of the causative drugs and must never be re-administered. SCs in treatment of SCARs may increase the complications and the mortality rate.

Comparative efficacies of nebulized budesonide and systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids are recommended by almost all international guidelines for the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nevertheless, due to their side effects, there are still concerns regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCs). The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guideline states nebulized budesonide (NB) may be a suitable alternative to SCs for treating COPD exacerbations. We conducted this study to systematically compare the efficacies of NB and SCs by using a meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from database inception to 10 October 2019. Our main end points were change in pulmonary function and blood gas analysis. Secondary end points were numbers of exacerbations and hyperglycaemia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 645 identified studies, 6 were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 867 participants). Compared with SCs, NB was non-inferior on the change in FEV1 %predicted at 24 hours, 48-72 hours and 5-7 days; FEV1 at 5-7 days; FEV1 /FVC at 7 days. For blood gas analysis, our meta-analysis indicated that PaO2 , PaCO2 at 24 hours, 48-72 hours and 7-10 days and SaO2 at 24 hours and 7-10 days showed a non-significant difference in both groups, whereas the SaO2 was significant higher in NB group at 48-72 hours after treatment. Hyperglycaemia was less frequent with NB (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.01-0.85; P = .04). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Based on our meta-analysis, NB was not inferior to SCs when used in the treatment of COPD exacerbations. However, additional well-designed prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal dose of nebulized budesonide and the effects of nebulized budesonide in outpatients, or patients in ICU settings.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with incremental systemic corticosteroid exposure in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although systemic corticosteroid (SCS) treatment, irrespective of duration or dosage, is associated with adverse outcomes for patients with asthma, the longitudinal effects of this treatment on adverse outcomes, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs are unknown. METHODS: We identified patients initiating intermittent or long-term SCS who were diagnosed with active asthma from UK general practice with linked secondary care data. Control (non-SCS) patients were matched by sex and index date with those initiating SCS. Minimum baseline period was 1 year prior to index date; minimum follow-up duration was 2 years post-index date. Cumulative incidence of SCS-associated adverse outcomes and associated HCRU and costs were compared between SCS and non-SCS patient groups and among average SCS daily exposure categories. Associations between exposure and annualized HCRU and costs were assessed, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Analyses included 9413 matched pairs. Median (interquartile range) follow up was as follows: SCS group: 7.1 (4.1-11.8) years; control group: 6.4 (3.8-10.0) years. Greater SCS dosages were correlated with greater cumulative incidence. For example, patients with type 2 diabetes receiving an average daily dosage of ≥7.5 mg had a 15-year cumulative incidence (37.5%) that was 1.5-5 times greater than those receiving lower dosages. HCRU and costs increased annually for SCS patients but not for non-SCS patients. Increases in all-cause adverse outcome (excluding asthma)-associated HCRU and costs were dose-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Over the long term, adverse outcomes associated with SCS initiation were relatively frequent and costly, with a positive dosage-response relationship with SCS exposure.

Effects of systemic corticosteroids on blood eosinophil counts in asthma: real-world data.

Introduction: Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are effective anti-inflammatory therapies for patients with severe or persistent asthma. Use of SCS reduces blood eosinophil counts; the magnitude and duration of reduction in real-world settings needs further investigation. Objective: To examine the SCS effect on blood eosinophil counts over time among patients with asthma in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective study used Reliant Medical Group (Worcester, MA) electronic medical records between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients aged ≥12 years with ≥1 SCS prescription (first: index date), ≥1 asthma diagnosis, and ≥1 eosinophil count in each 12-month pre- and post-index periods were included for the study. Endpoints included SCS treatment patterns, time to SCS discontinuation, and changes in index blood eosinophil counts (≥150, ≥300, and ≥400 cells/µL) with SCS initiation and discontinuation. Results: At index visit, 642 of 1198 included patients had a blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL. After an average initial SCS prescription of 35 mg/day, mean (% change) eosinophil counts at month 1 in the ≥150, ≥300, and≥400 cells/µL subgroups decreased from index by 112 (-30%), 202 (-34%), and 290 (-36%) cells/µL, respectively. Of the patients with an eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL at index, who discontinued SCS within 7, 14, or 21 days after the index date, 21%, 26%, and 25% had an eosinophil count <150 cells/µL 1-month post-index, respectively. Conclusion: Blood eosinophil counts decreased following initiation of SCS therapy and had not returned to index levels several weeks after SCS discontinuation. The time frame of SCS discontinuation is an important consideration when identifying patients with eosinophilic asthma.