Aortic blood pressure and pulse wave indices responses to exercise in peripheral artery disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) refers to obstructed blood flow in peripheral arteries typically due to atherosclerotic plaques. How PAD alters aortic blood pressure and pressure wave propagation during exercise is unclear. Thus, this study examined central blood pressure responses to plantar flexion exercise by investigating aortic pulse wave properties in PAD. Thirteen subjects with PAD and 13 healthy [age-, sex-, body mass index (BMI) matched] subjects performed rhythmic plantar flexion for 14 min or until fatigue (20 contractions/min; started at 2 kg with 1 kg/min increment up to 12 kg). Brachial (oscillometric cuff) and radial (SphygmoCor) blood pressure and derived-aortic waveforms were analyzed during supine rest and plantar flexion exercise. At rest, baseline augmentation index (P = 0.0263) and cardiac wasted energy (P = 0.0321) were greater in PAD due to earlier arrival of the reflected wave (P = 0.0289). During exercise, aortic blood pressure (aMAP) and aortic pulse pressure showed significant interaction effects (P = 0.0041 and P = 0.0109, respectively). In particular, PAD had a greater aMAP increase at peak exercise (P = 0.0147). Moreover, the tension time index was greater during exercise in PAD (P = 0.0173), especially at peak exercise (P = 0.0173), whereas the diastolic time index (P = 0.0685) was not different between the two groups. Hence, during exercise, the subendocardial viability ratio was lower in PAD (P = 0.0164), especially at peak exercise (P = 0.0164). The results suggest that in PAD, the aortic blood pressure responses and myocardial oxygen demand during exercise are increased compared with healthy controls.

Thermal acclimation and acute temperature effects on cardiac barostatic reflexes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Acute warming raises the metabolism of fish, which is matched by increased heart rate. However, thermal acclimation may reduce heart rate through combinations of lowered intrinsic pacemaker rate and increased inhibitory vagal tone. This could affect the baroreflex, which regulates arterial blood pressure through heart rate changes via altered vagal tone. Using pharmacological tools, we assessed autonomic tones and baroreflex regulation of heart rate in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at 11 °C, and after acute (24 h, 17°Cacute) or chronic (>7 weeks, 17°Cchronic) warming to 17 °C. We hypothesised that warm acclimation would manifest as reduced heart rate and elevated vagal tone in 17°Cchronic trout relative to 11 °C and 17°Cacute trout, which would increase baroreflex gain and the scope for fH increase through vagal release during hypotension. Compared to 11 °C, the 17°Cacute group exhibited slightly higher heart rate (Q10 = 1.5) and a strong trend for elevated vagal tone (54%). Surprisingly, however, routine heart rate was unaltered by warm acclimation (Q10 = 1.6), while intrinsic heart rate and vagal tone (22%) declined. Consequently, baroreflex sensitivity to reduced blood pressure was elevated in the 17°Cacute group but returned towards 11 °C conditions in the 17°Cchronic group. Atropine abolished nearly all chronotropic changes. Bradycardic responses to hypertension and cardiac adrenergic tone were unaltered across temperature treatments. The lack of a clear acclimation effect on routine heart rate in the present study is likely explained by a seasonal effect as the experiments were performed in early winter. Nonetheless, we conclude that baroreflex sensitivity in trout is thermally plastic; the heightened baroreflex sensitivity to hypotension following acute warming likely serves to safeguard tissue oxygen delivery as metabolism is elevated, while the reduced baroreflex sensitivity observed with warm acclimation may be linked to a pronounced metabolic down-regulation.

Cuff Under Pressure for Greater Accuracy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the evidence that describes what is being measured by upper-arm cuff blood pressure (BP) and the level of accuracy compared with invasive central aortic and brachial BP. Potential causes of inaccuracy and emerging methods are also discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: On average cuff systolic BP systematically underestimates invasive brachial systolic BP, although in a given individual it may substantially under- or over-estimate central aortic systolic BP. Such errors may affect individual health management outcomes and distort population level data on hypertension prevalence and control. Oscillometric cuff BP is particularly susceptible to inaccuracy in people with high arterial stiffness and with pathophysiological BP waveform shapes. Emerging cuff-less BP methods will be susceptible to inaccuracy if oscillometric cuff BP is used for calibration. The original purpose of cuff BP was to estimate central aortic BP. Recent evidence has shown substantial inaccuracy of oscillometric cuff BP exists for the measurement of invasive central aortic and brachial BP. Thus, development of more accurate BP methods, through better understanding of oscillometric and BP waveform morphology, is needed to improve health outcomes related to high BP.

Effects of acute dietary nitrate supplementation on aortic blood pressures and pulse wave characteristics in post-menopausal women.

PURPOSE: Consumption of nitrate-rich beetroot juice can lower blood pressure in peripheral as well as central arteries and may exert additional hemodynamic benefits (e.g. reduced aortic wave reflections). The specific influence of nitrate supplementation on arterial pressures and aortic wave properties in postmenopausal women, a group that experiences accelerated increases in these variables with age, is unknown. Accordingly, the primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of consuming nitrate-rich beetroot juice on resting brachial and aortic blood pressures (BP) and pulse wave characteristics in a group of healthy postmenopausal women, in comparison to a true (nitrate-free beetroot juice) placebo. METHODS: Brachial (oscillometric cuff) and radial (SphygmoCor) pressures and derived-aortic waveforms were measured during supine rest in thirteen healthy postmenopausal women (63 ±â€¯1 yr) before and 100 min after consumption of 140 ml of either nitrate-rich (9.7 mmol, 0.6 gm NO3-) or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice on randomized visits approximately 10 days apart (cross-over design). Ten young premenopausal women (22 ±â€¯1 yr) served as a reference (non-supplemented) cohort. RESULTS: Brachial and derived-aortic variables showed the expected age-associated differences in these women (all p < 0.05). In post-menopausal women, nitrate supplementation reduced (p < 0.05 vs. placebo visit) brachial systolic BP (BRnitrate -4.9 ±â€¯2.1 mmHg vs BRplacebo +1.1 ± 1.8 mmHg), brachial mean BP (BRnitrate -4.1 ±â€¯1.7 mmHg vs BRplacebo +0.9 ± 1.3 mmHg), aortic systolic BP (BRnitrate -6.3 ±â€¯2.0 mmHg vs BRplacebo +0.5 ± 1.7 mmHg) and aortic mean BP (BRnitrate -4.1 ±â€¯1.7 mmHg vs BRplacebo +0.9 ± 1.3 mmHg), and increased pulse pressure amplification (BRnitrate +4.6 ± 2.0% vs BRplacebo +0.7 ± 2.5%, p = 0.04), but did not alter aortic pulse wave velocity or any other derived-aortic variables (e.g., augmentation pressure or index). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary nitrate supplementation favorably modifies aortic systolic and mean blood pressure under resting conditions in healthy postmenopausal women. Acute supplementation of nitrate does not, however, appear to restore indices of aortic stiffness in this group. Future work should evaluate chronic, long-term effects of this non-pharmacological supplement.

Correlation among lipid parameters, pulse wave velocity and central blood pressure in young Korean population.

BACKGROUND: Central blood pressure is closely related to the important cardiovascular intermediate end points, such as vascular hypertrophy and extent of carotid atherosclerosis. Therefore it is prudent to study correlation among central aortic blood pressure, body composition, lipid profiles, and pulse wave velocity in population-based study. Consequently, we investigate the correlation between central aortic blood pressure and other risk parameters of hypertension such as body composition and lipid profile. METHODS: We recruited 20 young participants diagnosed with hypertension as well as 30 without hypertension. The study used an X-SCAN PLUS 950 machine for measurement of overall body composition. Measurements of central blood pressure and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were carried out using SphygmoCor XCEL. RESULTS: The hypertensive participants had significantly higher total weight without fat, body moisture mass, muscle mass, body mass index, basal metabolic rate, intracellular and extracellular water contents, protein and mineral contents along with brachial and central aortic blood pressures. In both hypertensive and non-hypertensive participants, central aortic diastolic blood pressure were significantly related to the lipid parameters. CONCLUSION: Overall, the correlations between central blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and lipid profile in hypertensive and non-hypertensive participants were substantial.

Gender differences of aortic wave reflection and influence of menopause on central blood pressure in patients with arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Evidences suggest that central hemodynamics indexes are independent predictors of future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multiple factors have been pointed to have potential influence on central aortic function: height, heart rate, left ventricular ejection duration and blood pressure level. Data related to the influence of gender and postmenopausal status on aortic waveform reflection is scarce. We aim to evaluate the impact of gender and menopause on central blood pressure of hypertensive patients. METHODS: In a cross sectional study 122 hypertensive patients (52 men and 70 women) were studied. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure (BP) levels ≥140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs. Central arterial pressure, augmentation index (AIx) and augmentation index normalized to 75 bpm (AIx75) were obtained using applanation tonometry. Menopause and postmenopause history were accessed by a direct series of questions. Postmenopause was defined as at least one year since last menstruation. Patients were paired by age, gender and menopausal status, and the data were compared considering gender and menopausal status. RESULTS: Height and weight were significantly lower in women than in men at the same age. Conversely, AIx (32.7 ± 9.8% vs. 20.1 ± 11.7%, p < 0.01), AIx75 (29.6 ± 6.7% vs. 18.3 ± 9.4%, p < 0.01) and central systolic blood pressure (136 ± 30 vs. 125 ± 23 mmHg, p = 0.03) were higher in women than men. The menopausal women (mean age of menopause = 48 years) had the worst indexes of aortic wave reflection, compared to men at the same age and younger women. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive women had both higher reflected aortic pressure waveform and central blood pressure indexes than hypertensive men, and these findings were worsened by the menopausal status.

Cuff-Based Oscillometric Central and Brachial Blood Pressures Obtained Through ABPM are Similarly Associated with Renal Organ Damage in Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Central blood pressure (BP) has been suggested to be a better estimator of hypertension-associated risks. We aimed to evaluate the association of 24-hour central BP, in comparison with 24-hour peripheral BP, with the presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Brachial and central (calculated by an oscillometric system through brachial pulse wave analysis) office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured in 208 hypertensive patients. Renal organ damage was evaluated by means of the albumin to creatinine ratio and the estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (25.9%) were affected by renal organ damage, displaying either microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion ≥30 mg/g creatinine) or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Compared to those without renal abnormalities, hypertensive patients with kidney damage had higher values of office brachial systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP), and 24-h, daytime, and nighttime central and brachial SBP and PP. They also had a blunted nocturnal decrease in both central and brachial BP, and higher values of aortic PWV. After adjustment for age, gender, and antihypertensive treatment, only ABPM-derived BP estimates (both central and brachial) showed significant associations with the presence of renal damage. Odds ratios for central BP estimates were not significantly higher than those obtained for brachial BP. CONCLUSION: Compared with peripheral ABPM, cuff-based oscillometric central ABPM does not show a closer association with presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients. More studies, however, need to be done to better identify the role of central BP in clinical practice.

Effects of acute dietary nitrate supplementation on aortic blood pressure and aortic augmentation index in young and older adults.

PURPOSE: Aging is associated with elevated blood pressure (peripheral and aortic; BP) and aortic augmentation index (AIx) which may contribute to aortic BP. Although inorganic nitrate consumption reduces peripheral BP in both young and older adults, the effects of nitrate consumption on aortic BP and wave reflection in young and older adults is unknown. Therefore, we sought to characterize the effects of nitrate consumption on aortic BP and AIx in young and older adults. METHODS: Noninvasive aortic pressure waveforms were synthesized from high-fidelity radial pressure waveforms via applanation tonometry before and following (60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min) consumption of a nitrate-rich beetroot juice in 26 healthy adults (young: 25 ± 4 years, n = 14; older: 64 ± 5 years, n = 12). Aortic BP and indices of aortic wave reflection (AIx and AIx normalized for heart rate; AIx@75bpm) were calculated from the generated aortic pressure waveform. RESULTS: Nitrate consumption increased plasma nitrite in both groups 60-180 min following beetroot consumption (P < 0.001). Nitrate consumption reduced peripheral and aortic BP in both young and older adults (P < 0.05), with the change being similar between age groups. Conversely, indices of aortic wave reflection were reduced only in young adults following nitrate consumption (range of change from baseline over time: AIx@75bpm, -4.3 to -8.8%, P < 0.05), whereas aortic AIx remained unchanged in the older adults. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results suggest that acute dietary nitrate supplementation reduces peripheral and aortic BP similarly in young and older adults despite differential effects on aortic AIx between age groups.

Effect of acute nitrate ingestion on central hemodynamic load in hypoxia.

UNLABELLED: Acute hypoxia results in local vasodilation that may temporarily unload the left ventricle (LV) through nitric oxide (NO)-mediated mechanisms. Whether increasing NO levels augments LV unloading and improves ventricular-vascular coupling in hypoxia remains unknown. PURPOSE: Investigate the effect of acute nitrate ingestion on central hemodynamic load in hypoxia. METHODS: 20 Healthy men (23 ± 3 yrs, BMI 24.6 ± 2.8 kg m(-2)) consumed 70 mL of either a) 0.45 g nitrate (NIT) or b) an inert placebo (PLA) prior to 105 min of normobaric hypoxia (11.6 ± 0.1%) in this randomized, double-blind, crossover-design study. Wave reflection index (RIX; ratio of forward to reflected wave pressure), augmentation index (AIX75) and pulse wave velocity were calculated as measures of wave reflection magnitude and aortic stiffness, respectively, from the aortic blood pressure (BP) waveform. LV wasted pressure effort (WPE) was calculated as an index of LV work due to wave reflections. Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) was assessed a measure of myocardial O2 supply/demand ratio. RESULTS: Aortic diastolic BP decreased in hypoxia compared to normoxia (p < 0.05). Aortic RIX, AIX75, and LV WPE significantly decreased in hypoxia compared to normoxia (p < 0.05). Aortic systolic BP, SEVR, and PWV were unaffected by hypoxia (p > 0.05). Compared to placebo, nitrate ingestion did not significantly alter central hemodynamics in hypoxia (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acute hypoxic exposure unloads the LV (WPE, AIX75, and RIX) without disturbing myocardial O2 supply-demand ratio (SEVR). Reductions in LV work with hypoxia are likely due to reductions in pressure from wave reflections as hypoxia had negligible effects on aortic stiffness. Nitrate ingestion did not affect the central hemodynamic response to acute systemic hypoxia.

l-Citrulline supplementation attenuates blood pressure, wave reflection and arterial stiffness responses to metaboreflex and cold stress in overweight men.

Combined isometric exercise or metaboreflex activation (post-exercise muscle ischaemia (PEMI)) and cold pressor test (CPT) increase cardiac afterload, which may lead to adverse cardiovascular events. l-Citrulline supplementation (l-CIT) reduces systemic arterial stiffness (brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV)) at rest and aortic haemodynamic responses to CPT. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of l-CIT on aortic haemodynamic and baPWV responses to PEMI+CPT. In all, sixteen healthy, overweight/obese males (age 24 (sem 6) years; BMI 29·3 (sem 4·0) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to placebo or l-CIT (6 g/d) for 14 d in a cross-over design. Brachial and aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), aortic augmented pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), baPWV, reflection timing (Tr) and heart rate (HR) were evaluated at rest and during isometric handgrip exercise (IHG), PEMI and PEMI+CPT at baseline and after 14 d. No significant effects were evident after l-CIT at rest. l-CIT attenuated the increases in aortic SBP and wave reflection (AP and AIx) during IHG, aortic DBP, MAP and AIx during PEMI, and aortic SBP, DBP, MAP, AP, AIx and baPWV during PEMI+CPT compared with placebo. HR and Tr were unaffected by l-CIT in all conditions. Our findings demonstrate that l-CIT attenuates aortic blood pressure and wave reflection responses to exercise-related metabolites. Moreover, l-CIT attenuates the exaggerated arterial stiffness response to combined metaboreflex activation and cold exposure, suggesting a protective effect against increased cardiac afterload during physical stress.

Changes in Central Aortic Pressure Levels, Wave Components and Determinants Associated with High Peripheral Blood Pressure States in Childhood: Analysis of Hypertensive Phenotype.

The aims were to determine whether children's high peripheral blood pressure states (HBP) are associated with increased central aortic blood pressure (BP) and to characterize hemodynamic and vascular changes associated with HBP in terms of changes in cardiac output (stroke volume, SV), arterial stiffness (aortic pulse wave velocity, PWV), peripheral vascular resistances (PVR) and net and relative contributions of reflected waves to the aortic pulse amplitude. We included 154 subjects (mean age 11; range 4-16 years) assigned to one of two groups: normal peripheral BP (NBP, n = 101), defined as systolic and diastolic BP < 90th percentile, or high BP (HBP, n = 53), defined as average systolic and/or diastolic BP levels ≥90th percentile (curves for sex, age and body height). The HBP group included children with hypertensive and pre-hypertensive BP levels. After a first analysis, groups were compared excluding obese and dyslipidemic children. Peripheral and central aortic BP, PWV and pulse wave-derived parameters (augmentation index, forward and backward wave components' amplitude) were measured using gold-standard techniques, applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) and oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph). Independent of the presence of dyslipidemia and/or obesity, aortic systolic and pulse BP were higher in HBP than in NBP children. The increase in central BP could not be explained by an increase in the relative contribution of reflections to the aortic pressure wave, higher PVR or by an augmented peripheral reflection coefficient. Instead, the rise in central BP would be explained by an increase in the amplitude of both incident and reflected wave components.

Impact of leg blood flow restriction during walking on central arterial hemodynamics.

Walking exercise with limb blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to increase muscular mass and strength even if it is performed at low exercise intensities. Despite mounting evidence for its efficacy and the increasing popularity, the safety of BFR exercise in relation to cardiac loads has not been established. The aim of this study was to determine the response of central hemodynamics during the BFR exercise to assess its impact on cardiac load. Fifteen apparently healthy sedentary or recreationally active adults (10 men and 5 women, 27 ± 1 yr) underwent five bouts of 2-min constant treadmill walking at 2 mph with 1-min rest intervals either with or without BFR on both proximal thighs. Beat-by-beat blood pressure and hemodynamics (via Modelflow method) were measured, and central arterial hemodynamics were evaluated with pulse wave analyses via general transfer function. Incident wave amplitude (IWA) and reflected wave amplitude (RWA) were obtained by the wave separation analysis. Peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased more substantially during walking with BFR (43 ± 5% vs. baseline) than without BFR (11 ± 4% vs. baseline). Aortic SBP did not change significantly during walking without BFR, but there was a substantial elevation in aortic SBP (43 ± 5% vs. baseline) during walking with BFR. Significant effect of BFR was seen in IWA but not in RWA. These findings suggest that even during slow-speed walking, leg BFR induces substantial hypertensive responses in the aorta. However, this response could not be explained by the augmented wave reflection.

Development and validation of a novel method to derive central aortic systolic pressure from the MR aortic distension curve.

PURPOSE: Central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) is a more accurate measure of load and cardiovascular risk than brachial pressure. Unfortunately, CASP is difficult to measure using current methods. In this study we report three methods of determining CASP by combining MR-derived aortic area curves with different models of the pressure-area relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CASP was derived by calibrating aortic area curves to the brachial mean and diastolic pressure, using: linear, exponential, and arctangent models in 20 volunteers using a high temporal resolution spiral PC-MR flow sequence. The arctangent model also required calibration with pulse wave velocity. Carotid tonometry CASP was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Brachial systolic pressure correlated only moderately with carotid CASP r(2) = 0.46 (P = 0.01). However, arctangent, exponential, and linear CASP correlated strongly with carotid CASP, r(2) = 0.90, r(2) = 0.86, r(2) = 0.85, respectively (P < 0.0001). There was excellent agreement between carotid CASP and both arctangent (bias 1.5; SD 3.3) and exponential CASP (bias 0.6; SD 3.6). There was a slight underestimation using the linear model (bias -2.3; SD 3.8) and poor agreement and overestimation using brachial systolic pressure (bias 12.9; SD 8.0). CONCLUSION: We have shown that CASP can be derived from MR data: arctangent and exponential methods being superior to the linear method. The superior correlation of MR derived CASP over brachial systolic BP suggests these measures will allow more comprehensive assessment of systemic arterial hypertension.

Association between blood pressure control during aneurysm clipping and functional outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Objectives: We explored the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV) during craniotomy aneurysm clipping and short-term prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to provide a new method to improve prognosis of these patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the differences between patient groups with favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS ≤ 2) and unfavorable (mRS > 2) prognosis, and examined the association between intraoperative BPV and short-term prognosis. Results: The intraoperative maximum systolic blood pressure (SBPmax, p = 0.005) and the coefficient of variation of diastolic blood pressure (DBPCV, p = 0.029) were significantly higher in the favorable prognosis group. SBPmax (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.80-0.98) and Neu% (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.03-1.46) were independent influence factors on prognosis. Patients with higher standard deviations of SBP (82.7% vs. 56.7%; p = 0.030), DBP (82.7% vs. 56.7%; p = 0.030), and DBPCV (82.7% vs. 56.7%; p = 0.030) had more favorable prognosis. Conclusion: Higher SBPmax (≤180 mmHg) during the clipping is an independent protective factor for a 90-day prognosis. These results highlight the importance of blood pressure (BP) control for improved prognosis; higher short-term BPV during clipping may be a precondition for a favorable prognosis.

Dialysate Sodium Levels, Ambulatory Aortic Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Increased aortic blood-pressure(BP) and arterial stiffness are associated with higher cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis. Previous works showed that lower dialysate sodium is associated with lower brachial-BP; data on aortic-BP and arterial stiffness are limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different dialysate sodium concentrations on 72-h aortic-BP and arterial stiffness parameters in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This analysis is part of a prospective, non-randomized interventional study. Twenty-five hemodialysis patients underwent a set of three periods of different dialysate sodium concentrations; six sessions with dialysate sodium of 137meq/L, followed consecutively by six sessions with 139meq/L and, finally, six sessions with 141meq/L. At the start of the sixth hemodialysis session on each sodium concentration, 72-h ABPM (Mobil-O-Graph) was performed to evaluate aortic-BP and arterial stiffness indices during the overall 72-h, different 24-h, day-time and night-time periods. RESULTS: Mean 72-h aortic SBP/DBP were higher with increasing dialysate sodium concentrations (137meq/L: 114.2±15.3/77.0±11.8mmHg vs 139meq/L: 115.4±17.3/77.9±14.0mmHg vs 141meq/L: 120.5±18.4/80.5±14.7mmHg, p=0.002/p=0.057, respectively). Wave-reflections parameters (AIx, AIx(75), AP) were not significantly different between the three dialysate sodium concentrations. Ambulatory PWV was significantly higher with increasing dialysate sodium concentrations (137meq/L: 8.5±1.7m/s vs 139meq/L: 8.6±1.6m/s vs 141meq/L: 8.8±1.6m/s, p<0.001). In generalized linear-mixed-models including 72-h brachial SBP as random covariate, the adjusted marginal-means of 72-h PWV were not significantly different between-groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that lower dialysate sodium concentrations are associated with significant decreases in ambulatory aortic BP and PWV. This study showed that higher dialysate sodium concentrations are associated with significant increases in ambulatory aortic BP and PWV. These findings further support the need for modification of dialysate sodium concentration in hemodialysis.

Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of the aortic blood pressure waveform by ultrasound and tonometry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Aortic blood pressure (ABP) is a more effective prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease than peripheral blood pressure. A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave, based on ultrasonic measurement of aortic flow combined with peripheral pulse wave measurements, has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). The objective of this study is to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. METHODS: We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform from non-invasively determined aortic blood flow velocity, aortic diameter, and radial pressure. The two aortic variables were acquired by an ultrasound system from 90 subjects, followed by recordings of radial pressure using a SphygmoCor device. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization (invasive validation, 8 subjects aged 62.3 ± 12.7 years) and a SphygmoCor device (non-invasive validation, 82 subjects aged 45.0 ± 17.8 years). RESULTS: In the invasive comparison, there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures: the mean error in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 1.4 ± 0.8 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 0.9 ± 0.8 mmHg; mean blood pressure (MBP), 1.8 ± 1.2 mmHg and pulse pressure (PP), 1.4 ± 1.1 mmHg. In the non-invasive comparison, the estimated and directly measured pressures also agreed well: the errors being: SBP, 2.0 ± 1.4 mmHg; DBP, 0.8 ± 0.1 mmHg; MBP, 0.1 ± 0.1 mmHg and PP, 2.3 ± 1.6 mmHg. The significance of the differences in mean errors between calculated and reference values for SBP, DBP, MBP and PP were assessed by paired t-tests. The agreement between the reference methods and those obtained by applying the new approach was also expressed by correlation and Bland-Altman plots. CONCLUSION: The new method proposed here can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic. SHORT ABSTRACT: A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). This study aims to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization or a SphygmoCor device. The results showed that there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures. The new method proposed can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic.

In silico data-based comparison of the accuracy and error source of various methods for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The higher clinical significance of central aortic blood pressure (CABP) compared to peripheral blood pressures has been extensively demonstrated. Accordingly, many methods for noninvasively estimating CABP have been proposed. However, there still lacks a systematic comparison of existing methods, especially in terms of how they differ in the ability to tolerate individual differences or measurement errors. The present study was designed to address this gap. METHODS: A large-scale 'virtual subject' dataset (n = 600) was created using a computational model of the cardiovascular system, and applied to examine several classical CABP estimation methods, including the direct method, generalized transfer function (GTF) method, n-point moving average (NPMA) method, second systolic pressure of periphery (SBP2) method, physical model-based wave analysis (MBWA) method, and suprasystolic cuff-based waveform reconstruction (SCWR) method. The errors of CABP estimation were analyzed and compared among methods with respect to the magnitude/distribution, correlations with physiological/hemodynamic factors, and sensitivities to noninvasive measurement errors. RESULTS: The errors of CABP estimation exhibited evident inter-method differences in terms of the mean and standard deviation (SD). Relatively, the estimation errors of the methods adopting pre-trained algorithms (i.e., the GTF and SCWR methods) were overall smaller and less sensitive to variations in physiological/hemodynamic conditions and random errors in noninvasive measurement of brachial arterial blood pressure (used for calibrating peripheral pulse wave). The performances of all the methods worsened following the introduction of random errors to peripheral pulse wave (used for deriving CABP), as characterized by the enlarged SD and/or increased mean of the estimation errors. Notably, the GTF and SCWR methods did not exhibit a better capability of tolerating pulse wave errors in comparison with other methods. CONCLUSIONS: Classical noninvasive methods for estimating CABP were found to differ considerably in both the accuracy and error source, which provided theoretical evidence for understanding the specific advantages and disadvantages of each method. Knowledge about the method-specific error source and sensitivities of errors to different physiological/hemodynamic factors may contribute as theoretical references for interpreting clinical observations and exploring factors underlying large estimation errors, or provide guidance for optimizing existing methods or developing new methods.

Optimization and validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff-based method for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure.

Clinical studies have extensively demonstrated that central aortic blood pressure (CABP) has greater clinical significance in comparison with peripheral blood pressure. Despite the existence of various techniques for noninvasively measuring CABP, the clinical applications of most techniques are hampered by the unsatisfactory accuracy or large variability in measurement errors. In this study, we proposed a new method for noninvasively estimating CABP with improved accuracy and reduced uncertain errors. The main idea was to optimize the estimation of the pulse wave transit time from the aorta to the occluded lumen of the brachial artery under a suprasystolic cuff by identifying and utilizing the characteristic information of the cuff oscillation wave, thereby improving the accuracy and stability of the CABP estimation algorithms under various physiological conditions. The method was firstly developed and verified based on large-scale virtual subject data (n = 800) generated by a computational model of the cardiovascular system coupled to a brachial cuff, and then validated with small-scale in vivo data (n = 34). The estimation errors for the aortic systolic pressure were -0.05 ± 0.63 mmHg in the test group of the virtual subjects and -1.09 ± 3.70 mmHg in the test group of the patients, both demonstrating a good performance. In particular, the estimation errors were found to be insensitive to variations in hemodynamic conditions and cardiovascular properties, manifesting the high robustness of the method. The method may have promising clinical applicability, although further validation studies with larger-scale clinical data remain necessary.

Invasively Measured Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure and Office Systolic Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in CKD.

Introduction: Central aortic blood pressure (BP) could be a better risk predictor than brachial BP. This study examined whether invasively measured aortic systolic BP improved outcome prediction beyond risk prediction by conventional cuff-based office systolic BP in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: In a prospective, longitudinal cohort study, aortic and office systolic BPs were registered in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG). CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Multivariable Cox models were used to determine the association with incident myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death. Results: Aortic and office systolic BPs were available in 39,866 patients (mean age: 64 years; 58% males; 64% with hypertension) out of which 6605 (17%) had CKD. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range: 4.6-10.1 years), 1367 strokes (CKD: 353), 1858 MIs (CKD: 446), and 7551 deaths (CKD: 2515) occurred. CKD increased the risk of stroke, MI, and death significantly. Office and aortic systolic BP were both associated with stroke in non-CKD patients (adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval per 10 mm Hg: 1.08 [1.05-1.12] and 1.06 [1.03-1.09], respectively) and with MI in patients with CKD (adjusted hazard ratios: 1.08 [1.03-1.13] and 1.08 [1.04-1.12], respectively). There was no significant difference between prediction of outcome with office or aortic systolic BP when adjusted models were compared with C-statistics. Conclusion: Regardless of CKD status, invasively measured central aortic systolic BP does not improve the ability to predict outcome compared with brachial office BP measurement.

Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods.

Background: The non-invasive estimation of aortic systolic (aoSBP) and pulse pressure (aoPP) is achieved by a great variety of devices, which differ markedly in the: 1) principles of recording (applied technology), 2) arterial recording site, 3) model and mathematical analysis applied to signals, and/or 4) calibration scheme. The most reliable non-invasive procedure to obtain aoSBP and aoPP is not well established. Aim: To evaluate the agreement between aoSBP and aoPP values invasively and non-invasively obtained using different: 1) recording techniques (tonometry, oscilometry/plethysmography, ultrasound), 2) recording sites [radial, brachial (BA) and carotid artery (CCA)], 3) waveform analysis algorithms (e.g., direct analysis of the CCA pulse waveform vs. peripheral waveform analysis using general transfer functions, N-point moving average filters, etc.), 4) calibration schemes (systolic-diastolic calibration vs. methods using BA diastolic and mean blood pressure (bMBP); the latter calculated using different equations vs. measured directly by oscillometry, and 5) different equations to estimate bMBP (i.e., using a form factor of 33% ("033"), 41.2% ("0412") or 33% corrected for heart rate ("033HR"). Methods: The invasive aortic (aoBP) and brachial pressure (bBP) (catheterization), and the non-invasive aoBP and bBP were simultaneously obtained in 34 subjects. Non-invasive aoBP levels were obtained using different techniques, analysis methods, recording sites, and calibration schemes. Results: 1) Overall, non-invasive approaches yielded lower aoSBP and aoPP levels than those recorded invasively. 2) aoSBP and aoPP determinations based on CCA recordings, followed by BA recordings, were those that yielded values closest to those recorded invasively. 3) The "033HR" and "0412" calibration schemes ensured the lowest mean error, and the "033" method determined aoBP levels furthest from those recorded invasively. 4) Most of the non-invasive approaches considered overestimated and underestimated aoSBP at low (i.e., 80 mmHg) and high (i.e., 180 mmHg) invasive aoSBP values, respectively. 5) The higher the invasively measured aoPP, the higher the level of underestimation provided by the non-invasive methods. Conclusion: The recording method and site, the mathematical method/model used to quantify aoSBP and aoPP, and to calibrate waveforms, are essential when estimating aoBP. Our study strongly emphasizes the need for methodological transparency and consensus for the non-invasive aoBP assessment.