Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 34(8): 1454-1459, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Catheter-based endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an endoscopic local treatment for patients with malignant biliary stricture (MBS). However, excessive heating of the bile duct by the current RFA system can induce serious complications. Recently, a new RFA system with automatic temperature control was developed. In the present study, we examined the safety of the new RFA system in patients undergoing endobiliary RFA for extrahepatic MBS. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study enrolled patients with unresectable or inoperable extrahepatic (> 2 cm from the hilum) MBS. Endobiliary RFA was performed using a newly developed RFA catheter (ELRA™, STARmed, Goyang, Korea) at a setting of 7 or 10 W for 120 s and with a target temperature of 80°C. A self-expandable metallic stent was inserted after endobiliary RFA. The rate of procedure-related adverse events was assessed. RESULTS: The 30 patients were enrolled in this study. Cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in 19 patients, pancreatic cancer was found in 9, and gallbladder cancers were recorded in 2. The mean stricture length was 22.1 ± 6.6 mm. Post-procedural adverse events occurred in three patients (10.0%; 2 mild pancreatitis and 1 cholangitis) without hemobilia and bile duct perforation. The pancreatitis and cholangitis resolved with conservative treatment. The cumulative duration of stent patency and survival were 236 and 383 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA using a newly developed catheter was safely applied in patents with extrahepatic MBS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of endobiliary RFA for MBS.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/instrumentación , Catéteres , Colestasis/cirugía , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Automatización , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Colestasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colestasis/etiología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 30(10): 1461-6, 2015 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26146796

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an alternative for patients after failed ERCP. To date, the evaluation of dedicated device for one-step EUS-BD has been limited. To determine feasibility and safety of a newly designed 7F stent introducer with tapered metal tip as a push-type dilator for one-step metal stent placement without additional fistula dilation in EUS-BD. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP were randomly assigned to a dedicated stent introducer with a modified hybrid metal stent (DH group, n = 16) or a conventional 8.5F biliary metal stent introducer with a fully covered metal stent (FC group, n = 16). The technical success, procedural times, clinical success rate, and adverse event rates were evaluated. RESULTS: One-step technical success without additional fistula dilation in the DH was 88% (14/16). Multi-step process in a stent placement was performed in all patients of the FC group. The procedural time in the DH was significantly shorter than the FC (10 vs. 15 min, P = 0.007). No difference in overall technical or clinical success was seen between the groups. The rate of an early adverse event was common in the FC compared with the DH (31.3% [5/16] in the FC vs. 6.3% [1/16] in the DH, P = 0.172), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated device for one-step EUS-BD may be technically feasible, safe, and shorten the procedural times with less chance of an additional fistula dilation process, resulting in a potential reduction of the early adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis/cirugía , Drenaje/instrumentación , Endosonografía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Stents , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Anciano , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Endosonografía/métodos , Seguridad de Equipos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA