Longitudinal quality of life after sublobar resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with early-stage lung cancer are not candidates for lobectomy because of various factors, with treatment options including sublobar resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Limited information exists regarding patient-centered outcomes after these treatments. METHODS: Subjects with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high risk for lobectomy who underwent treatment with sublobar resection or SBRT were recruited from five medical centers. Quality of life (QOL) was compared with the Short Form 8 (SF-8) for physical and mental health and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) surveys at baseline (pretreatment) and 7 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment. Propensity score methods were used to control for confounders. RESULTS: Of 337 subjects enrolled before treatment, 63% received SBRT. Among patients undergoing resection, 89% underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic surgery or robot-assisted resection. Adjusted analyses showed that SBRT-treated patients had both higher physical health SF-8 scores (difference in differences [DID], 6.42; p = .0008) and FACT-L scores (DID, 2.47; p = .004) at 7 days posttreatment. Mental health SF-8 scores were not different at 7 days (p = .06). There were no significant differences in QOL at other time points, and all QOL scores returned to baseline by 12 months for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is associated with better QOL immediately posttreatment compared with sublobar resection. However, both treatment groups reported similar QOL at later time points, with a return to baseline QOL. These findings suggest that sublobar resection and SBRT have a similar impact on the QOL of patients with early-stage lung cancer deemed ineligible for lobectomy.

Ten-year follow-up outcomes of limited resection trial for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The JCOG0804/WJOG4507L single-arm confirmatory trial indicated a satisfactory 10-year prognosis for patients who underwent limited resection for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer. However, only one prospective trial has reported a 10-year prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective study coordinated by the National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kanagawa Cancer Center. We analyzed the long-term prognosis of 100 patients who underwent limited resection of a radiologically less-invasive lung cancer in the peripheral lung field. We defined radiologically less-invasive lung cancer as lung adenocarcinoma with a maximum tumor diameter of ≤2 cm, tumor disappearance ratio of ≥0.5 and cN0. The primary endpoint was the 10-year local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Our patients, with a median age of 62 years, included 39 males. A total of 58 patients were non-smokers; 87 had undergone wide wedge resection and 9 underwent segmentectomy. A total of four cases were converted to lobectomy because of the presence of poorly differentiated components in the frozen specimen or insufficient margin with segmentectomy. The median follow-up duration was 120.9 months. The 10-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of patients with lung cancer were both 96.0%. Following the 10-year long-term follow-up, two patients experienced recurrences at resection ends after wedge resection. CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection imparted a satisfactory prognosis for patients with radiologically less-invasive lung cancer, except two cases of local recurrence >5 years after surgery. These findings suggest that patients with this condition who underwent limited resection may require continued follow-up >5 years after surgery.

Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm. METHODS: Data were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: In SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830). CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Segmental resection with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard procedure for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion. As an alternative option, we developed a novel segmental resection (SR) with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) that enhances radicality. In this report, the surgical technique with video and outcomes are described. METHOD: We performed SR with pMME on seven consecutive patients with third or fourth duodenal carcinoma between 2009 and 2021. We divided the procedure into four sections, including (1) wide Kocher's maneuver, (2) supracolic anterior artery-first approach, (3) dissection of the mesopancreas and mesojejunum, and (4) devascularization of the uncinate process and dissection of duodenum. RESULT: Median operative time was 348 min (range, 222-391 min), and median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-580 mL). Major complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3a or more occurred in one patient. All patients achieved R0 resections with 10 mm or more proximal margin. Six cases (85%) were alive without recurrence. CONCLUSION: We developed a radical and safe procedure of SR with pMME as an alternative and less invasive approach for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

Limited resection for early-stage thymoma: minimally invasive resection does not mean limited resection.

Standard resection for patients with thymoma is resection of thymoma with total thymectomy (TTx) via median sternotomy. Hence, limited resection for thymoma means a lesser extent of resection of normal thymus compared with a standard procedure, i.e. resection of thymoma with partial thymectomy (PTx). In contrast, minimally invasive resection has been defined as resection of thymoma with TTx via a less-invasive approach. However, to date, few studies have precisely evaluated the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes among these three procedures. This report summarizes the differences among these three procedures with a review of studies (January 2000 to December 2020) focusing on the difference in surgical and oncological outcomes and presents current issues in the surgical management of thymoma. In this report, 16 studies were identified; 5 compared standard resection to limited resection, 9 compared standard resection to minimally invasive resection and 2 compared limited resection to minimally invasive resection. Most studies reported that the surgical and oncological outcomes of limited resection or minimally invasive resection were similar to those of standard resection in patients with early-stage thymoma. However, they did not include a sufficient follow-up period. Both limited resection and minimally invasive resection for early-stage thymoma might be reasonable treatment options. However, they are still promising modes of resection. Further studies with a long follow-up period are needed.

Limited resection vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

It is well known that surgery is the mainstay treatment for duodenal adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal extent of surgery is still under debate. We aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of limited resection (LR) and pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. A systematic electronic database search of the literature was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. All studies comparing LR and pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were selected. Long-term overall survival was considered as the primary outcome, and perioperative morbidity and mortality as the secondary outcomes. Fifteen studies with a total of 3166 patients were analyzed; 995 and 1498 patients were treated with limited resection and pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Eight and 7 studies scored a low and intermediate risk of publication bias, respectively. The LR group had a more favorable result than the pancreatoduodenectomy group in overall morbidity (odd ratio [OR]: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.65) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR: 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.43). Mortality (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.33) and overall survival (OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.13) were not significantly different between the two groups, although comparison of the two groups stratified by prognostic factors, such as T categories, was not possible due to a lack of detailed data. LR showed long-term outcomes equivalent to those of pancreatoduodenectomy, while the perioperative morbidity rates were lower. LR could be an option for selected duodenal adenocarcinoma patients with appropriate location or depth of invasion, although further studies are required.

Outcomes of limited resection for patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: /ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to clarify the oncological outcomes of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) who underwent limited resection (LR). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 110 patients with IPMN. Patients with IPMN without a history of pancreatitis who had neither tumor infiltration nor regional lymph node swelling on imaging findings underwent LR. We assessed the oncological outcomes of LR for patients with IPMN by comparing the surgical outcomes of LR and standard resection. RESULTS: LR was performed in 50 patients (45.5%), including duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n = 31), middle-pancreatectomy (n = 12), spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (n = 3), total parenchymal pancreatectomy (n = 3), and partial resection (n = 1). In the LR group, 18 patients had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa. After histopathological examination, the presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and invasive carcinoma (IC) were observed in nine and three patients, respectively, in the LR group, and eight and 22 patients, respectively, in the standard resection group. There was a significant difference in the histopathological diagnosis of IC between the two groups (p < 0.001). Finally, in the LR group, postoperative recurrences occurred in three patients, and the 5-, 10-, and 15-year disease-specific survival rates were all 97.0%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with IPMN judged to have no infiltrating lesions based on the detailed imaging examination, LR is acceptable and may be considered as an alternative to standard resection.

Clinicopathological Characteristics, Surgical Treatments, and Survival Outcomes of Patients with Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare and their clinicopathological features have not been completely described. In this retrospective study, we examined the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment for duodenal GISTs. METHODS: We examined patients surgically treated for duodenal GISTs from 1999 to 2016 at the China National Cancer Center. We analyzed patient characteristics, treatments, histological examinations, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: The 52 surgeries performed included 14 pancreaticoduodenectomies (26.9%), 37 limited resections (71.2%), and one palliative bypass procedure (1.9%). No surgery-related death occurred. The complication rate in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy was slightly higher than that in patients who underwent limited resection. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were 89.1 and 72.9%, respectively. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were not significantly related to surgical methods. Large tumor size and high mitotic rate were associated with poor overall survival outcomes. However, no independent factor was associated with prognosis, which may be due to the small sample size. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors was good. Limited resection seems to be oncologically feasible, with outcomes being less worse than those of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: By comparing the long-term prognostic outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and limited resection (LR), this study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical modality for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). METHODS: Two authors independently searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for published articles comparing the long-term prognostic and clinicopathological factors of duodenal GIST patients undergoing PD versus LR. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: After screening, 10 items comprising 623 cases were eventually included. This meta-analysis explicitly indicated that PD treatment was associated with worse long-term prognosis (hazard ratio = 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.69; p < 0.001; I2 = 0) and more complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.90; 95% CI, 1.90-4.42; p < 0.001; I2 = 10%) than LR treatment. Nevertheless, for duodenal GISTs, PD was related to the following clinicopathological features: invasion of the second part of the duodenum (OR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.69-6.79; p < 0.001; I2 = 50%), high-degree tumor mitosis (> 5/50 high-power fields; OR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.42-3.52; p < 0.001; I2 = 0), and high-risk classification (OR = 3.17; 95% CI; 2.13-4.71; p < 0.001; I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Since PD is associated with worse long-term prognosis and more complications, its safety and efficacy should be ascertained. Our findings recommend the use of LR to obtain negative incision margins when conditions permit it.

The impact of resection method and patient factors on quality of life among stage IA non-small cell lung cancer surgical patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given the increased number of treatment options for stage IA lung cancer patients, there is a growing body of literature that focuses on comparing each option's relative impact on quality of life (QoL). The current study seeks to further understand the differences in these patients' QoL according to surgical approach. METHODS: Screening-diagnosed first primary pathologic stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer surgical patients from the I-ELCAP cohort who answered a baseline and 1-year follow-up QoL questionnaire (SF-12) were included in the analysis. Thoracotomy patients (N = 85) were compared with VATS patients (N = 15) using paired t-tests and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses indicated no differences in QoL change between the two groups from pre- to post-surgery. Physical and emotional role functioning significantly improved among VATS patients and worsened among thoracotomy patients. Among thoracotomy patients, a significant decrease in post-surgical physical QoL was observed only in those who underwent lobectomy (-3.3; 95% CI: -5.1,-1.5), not limited resection. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, preliminary findings underscore that changes in overall QoL are similar in VATS and thoracotomy stage IA lung cancer patients. Extension of the resection may be a more relevant factor on QoL post-surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:173-180. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Limited resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer as function-preserving radical surgery: a review.

Since 'radical lobectomy' was reported by Cahan in 1960, the standard surgical care for lung cancer has been lobectomy, in which units of the lobe are excised with their specific regional hilar and mediastinal lymphatics. However, pulmonary function-preserving limited resection for lung cancer has gradually become more prevalent in the late 20th century. In 1995, Ginsberg et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial in which limited resection (segmentectomy and wide-wedge resection) and lobectomy for stage I lung cancer were compared and reported that limited resection should not be applied to healthy patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. The detection of small-sized and early-stage lung cancers has improved with advancement in diagnostic technology. Ground-glass opacity of lung nodules, as recognized on thin-slice computed tomography, has also been widely recognized as being correlated with less-invasive pathological findings of alveolar epithelial cell replacement of cancer cells. The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a cohort study of early peripheral lung cancer and investigated the validity thin-slice computed tomography criteria to diagnose non-invasive lung adenocarcinoma for the preoperative prediction of pathological non-invasive cancer. Following this observational study, the on-going JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, JCOG0804/WJOG4507L and JCOG1211 trials were initiated to confirm the validity of limited resection for stage I lung cancer patients stratified according to preoperative thin-slice computed tomography findings; these trials will clarify whether limited resection for lung cancer is not function-preserving but also only curative surgery.

Surgery for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are an extremely rare subset of GISTs. The optimal surgical procedure remains not well defined. AIMS: We assessed the surgical approach and long-term outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent limited resection (LR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: From November 2005 to January 2016, 64 consecutive patients with duodenal GISTs in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and perioperative outcomes were analyzed according to the different surgical type. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (64.1%) underwent LR, while 23 patients (35.9%) underwent PD. All patients had negative surgical margins (R0). Median tumor size was larger for PD (6 cm) versus LR (4 cm) (P = 0.041). PD also had more complications than LR (PD, 69.6 vs. LR, 31.7%) (P = 0.002). The 3-year and 5-year RFS was 62.9 and 44.3%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year OS was 85.7 and 59.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated the only unfavorable predictive factor was tumor size >5 cm for RFS and OS. Although the complication rate in the PD group was higher than in the LR group, OS and RFS were not affected by the complication (P = 0.492 for OS, P = 0.512 for RFS). PD versus LR was not associated with RFS and OS. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) did not improve the survival of the patients after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of duodenal GISTs is mainly dependent on tumor biology rather than surgical procedure. LR should be the surgical procedure of choice for duodenal GISTs when technically feasible and no anatomical constrains. LR shows comparable survival and lower risk of postoperative complications compared by PD. The administration of IM both as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for duodenal GISTs needs large population and prospective study to evaluate its effect.

Prognostic Factors after Curative Resection for Single-Lesion Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Normal Liver Function: A Historical Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is now established as the treatment most likely to yield the best outcome. We aimed to clarify the risk factors for HCC recurrence after curative resection of single HCC in patients with normal liver function (NLF). METHODS: The clinical records of 105 patients with NFL and a single HCC less than 5 cm in diameter who had undergone curative liver resection between April 2000 and January 2013 were investigated. We analyzed risk factors for recurrence of HCC. RESULTS: Forty of the 105 patients suffered recurrence of HCC, and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 22.0 (5.1-148.5) months after surgery, and the liver was the most frequent site of recurrence. Univariate analysis showed that limited resection (LR; p = 0.002), the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (p = 0.023), C-reactive protein value (p = 0.001), bilirubin value (p = 0.042), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.042), operation time (p = 0.018), and amount of bleeding (p = 0.011) were associated with RFS. Multivariate analysis showed that LR (p = 0.007) was a significant risk factor associated with RFS. CONCLUSION: LR is a risk factor for HCC recurrence in patients with single-lesion HCC and NLF.

Sexuality Among Women Treated for Breast Cancer: A Survey of Three Surgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The quality of life of Mexican patients with breast cancer has been studied, but female sexual function has only been explored superficially. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire has been validated as a tool to measure sexual function among women with cancer. However, no study in Mexico has been published. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare female sexuality of breast cancer survivors treated with three surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey applied in patients without active disease and free of any oncologic treatment who underwent conservative mastectomy, and mastectomy with and without reconstruction. Patients included in this study had no evidence of active disease after at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up and agreed to complete the FSFI questionnaire during a surveillance visit. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included: 37.8% had undergone conservative mastectomy, 29.7% radical mastectomy, and 32.4% radical mastectomy plus reconstruction. Patients in the radical mastectomy group were older than those in the other groups (p = 0.002). Female sexual dysfunction was observed in 34% of patients, but in patients who underwent radical mastectomy, it was 63% by contrast with 14 and 29% in women treated with conservative mastectomy and radical mastectomy with reconstruction (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in patients treated with conservative mastectomy or reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Alternatively, radical mastectomy was offered to older patients, a condition that could contribute together with a loss of female perception to a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Limited resections for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors and their oncologic outcomes.

PURPOSE: Limited resection is considered a treatment option for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) whenever technically feasible, but the optimal technique for this is still not well defined. We present the various types of limited resections for duodenal GISTs and analyze their postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective clinicopathologic analysis were 21 patients who underwent limited resections for duodenal GIST between May, 2001 and June, 2014. The median follow-up period was 52 months (range 5-125 months). RESULTS: The patients comprised 12 men and 9 women, with a median age of 59 years (range 45-75 years), all of whom were treated by various forms of limited resection with clear margins. There were ten wedge resections with primary closure (eight open/two laparoscopic), two wedge resections with Roux-en Y duodenojejunostomy, three segmental duodenectomies with end-to-end duodenoduodenostomy, and six segmental duodenectomies with end-to-end duodenojejunostomy. Hepatic metastasis was found 27 months after surgery in one patient, who was given imatinib mesylate for 17 months to slow disease progression. The other 20 patients were alive and recurrence free at the time of writing. CONCLUSION: Excellent recurrence-free survival was achieved after limited resections, supporting the consideration of various methods of limited resection as the treatment of choice for duodenal GISTs.

Using frozen section to identify histological patterns in stage I lung adenocarcinoma of ≤ 3 cm: accuracy and interobserver agreement.

AIMS: The IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma provides a prognostically significant histological subclassification. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy, limitations and interobserver agreement of frozen sections for predicting histological subtype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Frozen section and permanent section slides from 361 resected stage I lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 3 cm in size were reviewed for predominant histological subtype and the presence or absence of lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary and solid patterns. Fifty cases were additionally reviewed by three pathologists to determine interobserver agreement. To test the accuracy of frozen section in judging degree of invasion, five pathologists reviewed frozen section slides from 35 cases with a predominantly lepidic pattern. There was moderate agreement on predominant histological subtype between frozen sections and final diagnosis (κ = 0.565). Frozen sections had high specificity for micropapillary and solid patterns (94% and 96%, respectively), but sensitivity was low (37% and 69%, respectively). The interobserver agreement was satisfactory (κ > 0.6, except for the acinar pattern). CONCLUSIONS: Frozen section can provide information on the presence of aggressive histological patterns-micropapillary and solid-with high specificity but low sensitivity. It was difficult to predict the predominant pattern on the basis of frozen sections, mostly because of sampling issues.

Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: case selection based on high-resolution computed tomography-interim results.

OBJECTIVE: Our previous trial for small ground-glass opacity nodule on high-resolution computed tomography suggested all these cancers might have been radically managed with limited resection. Good correlation between radiologic and pathologic findings in early lung adenocarcinomas has been reported. We aimed to confirm limited resection efficacy as radical surgery in patients with high-resolution computed tomography-indicated minimally invasive lung cancer. The purpose of this interim analysis is to report the details of the patient and nodule characteristics, intraoperative cytology capability as a negative margin indicator, and patient outcome with the median follow-up period of 7 years and 4 months. METHODS: Enrollment required patients with a tumor ≤2 cm, diagnosed or suspected as a cT1N0M0 carcinoma in the lung periphery and depicted on high-resolution computed tomography as a sub-solid nodule with tumor disappearance ratio ≥0.5. We performed a wedge or segmental resection as appropriate. The primary endpoint is 10 year local recurrence-free survival rate. RESULTS: This study started in November 2003, and 101 patients were enrolled as of November 2009. Of them, 95 were eligible for analysis. There were 38 men and 57 women, aged 30-75, averaging 62 years. Tumor sizes ranged from 7 to 20 mm on computed tomography, averaging 15 mm. There were 11 Noguchi type A tumors, 54 type B tumors, 24 type C tumors, one malignant lymphoma and 5 non-cancerous lesions. All cancers showed no vessel invasion. With a median follow-up period of 88 months, there have been no recurrences. CONCLUSION: So far, high-resolution computed tomography appears to predict non- or minimally invasive ground-glass opacity lung cancers with high reliability, warranting limited resection as curative surgery in this cohort.

Surgical management of superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We present our experiences with the so-called 'limited resections' such as transduodenal excision and local full-thickness resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors (SNADT). The optimal surgical management for SNADT is also discussed. METHODS: Six patients with SNADT (adenoma, n=1; mucosal carcinomas, n=2; submucosal carcinoma, n=1; carcinoids, n=2) were included in this study. Four patients underwent transduodenal excision, one local full-thickness resection, and one laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection as a modification of local full-thickness resection. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated by these limited resections without any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for SNADT not amenable to endoscopic resection in terms of technical and/or oncological reasons. However, the optimal surgical management for SNADT remains controversial because of the complexity of the relevant anatomy of the duodenum, its rarity, the not well-known incidence of nodal metastasis, and the wide spectrum of pathologies that can be encountered.

Resectable Distal Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Presenting with Features of Anaemia.

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are encountered all along the gastrointestinal tract, duodenal GISTs are uncommon and account for <5% of the cases. A 45-year-old woman presented chiefly with anaemia and associated symptoms, whom on further evaluation was found to have a non-metastatic GIST in the distal duodenum sparing the pancreas and major vasculature. Patient was undertaken for segmental duodenectomy with the help of advanced bipolar energy device (tumour occupying D3-D4 with 1 cm proximal margin and 15 cm jejunum) preserving the pancreas and ampulla with end-to-end duodenojejunostomy with an uneventful postoperative course and clear margins on histopathology. Thus, the patient underwent a less morbid procedure with satisfactory oncological outcome and early resumption of activity. This highlights the need to conduct more trials to gather high level evidence in favour of conservative resection and its oncological adequacy and impact on overall survival and recurrence.

Long-term follow-up of non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma who underwent extended thymectomy or limited resection.

BACKGROUD: The standard resection for early-stage thymoma is total thymectomy and complete tumour excision with or without myasthenia gravis but the optimal surgery mode for patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma is debatable. This study analysed the oncological outcomes for non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma treated by thymectomy or limited resection in the long term. METHODS: Patients who had resections of thymic neoplasms at Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan between December 1997 and March 2013 were recruited, exclusive of those combined clinical evidence of myasthenia gravis were reviewed. A total of 113 patients were retrospectively reviewed with pathologic early stage (Masaoka stage I and II) thymoma who underwent limited resection or extended thymectomy to compare their long-term oncologic and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The median observation time was 134.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 90.7-176.1 months]. In our cohort, 52 patients underwent extended thymectomy and 61 patients underwent limited resection. Shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and length of stay (p = 0.006) were demonstrated in limited resection group. Six patients experienced thymoma recurrence, two of which had combined myasthenia gravis development after recurrence. There was no significant difference (p = 0.851) in freedom-from-recurrence, with similar 10-year freedom-from-recurrence rates between the limited resection group (96.2 %) and the thymectomy group (93.2 %). Tumour-related survival was also not significantly different between groups (p = 0.726).result CONCLUSION: Patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma who underwent limited resection without complete excision of the thymus achieved similar oncologic outcomes during the long-term follow-up and better peri-operative results compared to those who underwent thymectomy.