RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Routine quality assurance (QA) of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans used for image-guided radiotherapy is prescribed by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (TG)-142 report. For CBCT image quality, TG-142 recommends using clinically established baseline values as QA tolerances. This work examined how image quality parameters vary both across machines of the same model and across different CBCT techniques. Additionally, this work investigated how image quality values are affected by imager recalibration and repeated exposures during routine QA. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of the Catphan 604 phantom were taken on four TrueBeam® and one Edge™ linear accelerator using four manufacturer-provided techniques. TG-142 image quality parameters were calculated for each CBCT scan using SunCHECK Machine™. The variability of each parameter with machine and technique was evaluated using a two-way ANOVA test on a dataset consisting of 200 CBCT scans. The impact of imager calibration on image quality parameters was examined for a subset of three machines using an unpaired Student's t-test. The effect of artifacts appearing on CBCTs taken in rapid succession was characterized and an approach to reduce their appearance was evaluated. Additionally, a set of baselines and tolerances for all image quality metrics was presented. RESULTS: All imaging parameters except geometric distortion varied with technique (P < 0.05) and all imaging parameters except slice thickness varied with machine (P < 0.05). Imager calibration can change the expected value of all imaging parameters, though it does not consistently do so. While changes are statistically significant, they may not be clinically significant. Finally, rapid acquisition of CBCT scans can introduce image artifacts that degrade CBCT uniformity. CONCLUSIONS: This work characterized the variability of acquired CBCT data across machines and CBCT techniques along with the impact of imager calibration and rapid CBCT acquisition on image quality.
Asunto(s)
Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico Espiral , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Humanos , Aceleradores de Partículas , Fantasmas de ImagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In medical linac quality assurance (QA), to replace film dosimetry with low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array measurements, to validate the procedures, and to perform a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. METHODS: A 2-D ionization chamber array with a spatial resolution of 7.62â¯mm was deployed to perform the following tests: Junction tests, MLC transmission test, beam profile constancy vs. gantry angle test, beam profile constancy vs. low dose delivery test, and beam energy constancy vs. low dose delivery test. Test validation and sensitivity analyses based on short- and long-term statistics of the test results were performed. RESULTS: All selected mechanical and dosimetry tests could be successfully performed with a 2-D array. Considering the tolerance limits recommended by the AAPM Task Group 142 report (2009), sensitivities of 99.0% or better and specificities ranging from 99.5% to 99.9% could be achieved in all tests when the proper metrics were chosen. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that a low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array could replace film dosimetry without having to sacrifice high test sensitivity. Its implementation in the routine clinical linac QA program may involve considerable QA time savings.