Non-KPC Attributes of Newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase Inhibitors, Part 1: Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Gram-negative antibiotic resistance continues to grow as a global problem due to the evolution and spread of ß-lactamases. The early ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) are characterized by spectra limited to class A ß-lactamases and ineffective against carbapenemases and most extended spectrum ß-lactamases. In order to address this therapeutic need, newer BLIs were developed with the goal of treating carbapenemase producing, carbapenem resistant organisms (CRO), specifically targeting the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). These BL/BLI combination drugs, avibactam/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam, have proven to be indispensable tools in this effort. However, non-KPC mechanisms of resistance are rising in prevalence and increasingly challenging to treat. It is critical for clinicians to understand the unique spectra of these BL/BLIs with respect to non-KPC CRO. In Part 1of this 2-part series, we describe the non-KPC attributes of the newer BL/BLIs with a focus on utility against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Relative inhibitory activities of newly developed diazabicyclooctanes, boronic acid derivatives, and penicillin-based sulfone ß-lactamase inhibitors against broad-spectrum AmpC ß-lactamases.

The relative inhibitory activities of diazabicyclooctanes (avibactam, relebactam, zidebactam, nacubactam, durlobactam), boronic acid derivatives (vaborbactam, taniborbactam, xeruborbactam), and penicillin-based sulfone derivative enmetazobactam were evaluated against several intrinsic and acquired class C ß-lactamases. By contrast to vaborbactam and enmetazobactam, taniborbactam, xeruborbactam, and all diazabicyclooctanes demonstrated effective activities against most AmpC enzymes. Notably, durlobactam exhibited the most pronounced inhibitory effect. Interstingly, the chromosomal AmpC of Acinetobacter baumannii was the least sensitive enzyme to the newly developed ß-lactamase inhibitors.

Effect of modification of penicillin-binding protein 3 on susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and cefiderocol of Escherichia coli strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases.

The impact of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) modifications that may be identified in Escherichia coli was evaluated with respect to susceptibility to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations including ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and to cefiderocol. A large series of E. coli recombinant strains producing broad-spectrum ß-lactamases was evaluated. While imipenem-relebactam showed a similar activity regardless of the PBP3 background, susceptibility to other molecules tested was affected at various levels. This was particularly the case for ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the different present and future therapeutic ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective ß-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations. RESULTS: For Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs. CONCLUSIONS: Zidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

PURPOSE: Relebactam is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor, which, when combined with imipenem/cilastatin, is active against both class A and class C ß-lactamases. To evaluate in vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem/relebactam against a collection of recent clinical isolates of carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae ST258 and ST512 KPC producers belonging to different lineages from hospitals in Southern Spain. METHODS: Six hundred and seventy-eight isolates were tested: 265 K. pneumoniae (230 ST512/KPC-3 and 35 ST258/KPC-3) and 413 carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin, and ceftazidime/avibactam were used as comparators against P. aeruginosa. Against K. pneumoniae ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam were not tested, and tigecycline was studied instead. MICs were determined in duplicate by broth microdilution according to EUCAST guidelines. RESULTS: Imipenem/relebactam displayed potent in vitro activity against both sequence types of KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae. MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively, with percent of susceptible isolates >97%. Only three K. pneumoniae ST512/KPC-3 isolates and one ST258/KPC-3 were resistant to imipenem/relebactam. Relebactam sensitized 98.5% of K. pneumoniae isolates resistant to imipenem. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa was moderate (susceptibility rate: 62.7%). Analysis of the acquired and mutational resistome of isolates with high levels of resistance to imipenem/relebactam has not shown a clear association between them. CONCLUSION: Imipenem/relebactam showed excellent activity against K. pneumoniae KPC-3. The activity of imipenem/relebactam against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa was moderate.

In vivo development of resistance to novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the dynamics that may characterize the emergence of KPC variants with resistance to novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ßL/ßLICs) represents a challenge to be overcome in the appropriate use of recently introduced antibiotics. METHODS: Retrospective case series describing development of multiple resistance to novel ßL/ßLICs in patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections treated with these drugs. Clinical-microbiological investigation and characterization of longitudinal strains by Whole-Genome Sequencing were performed. RESULTS: Four patients with KPC-Kp bloodstream infections were included. Most frequent clinical features were kidney disease, obesity, cardiac surgery as reason for admission, ICU stay, treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam, and pneumonia and/or acute kidney injury needing renal replacement therapy as KPC-Kp sepsis-associated complications. The development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in four longitudinal strains (three of which were co-resistant to aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol) following treatments with ceftazidime/avibactam (n = 3) or cefiderocol (n = 1). Resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was observed in one case after exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam. Resistome analysis showed that resistance to novel ßL/ßLICs was related to specific mutations within blaKPC carbapenemase gene (D179Y mutation [KPC-33]; deletion Δ242-GT-243 [KPC-14]) in three longitudinal strains, while porin loss (truncated OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins) was observed in one case. CONCLUSION: Therapy with novel ßL/ßLICs or cefiderocol may lead to the selection of resistant mutants in the presence of factors influencing the achievement of PK/PD targets. KPC variants are mainly associated with resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, and some of them (e.g. KPC-14) may also be associated with reduced susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam and/or cefiderocol. Loss of function of the OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins appears to play a role in the development of resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam, but other mechanisms may also be involved.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy-SMART 2017-2021.

PURPOSE: The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017-2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe. METHODS: Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in select ß-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets. RESULTS: C/T inhibited the growth of 85-87% of Enterobacterales and 94-96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95-98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98-99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91-92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7-8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

Susceptibility of gram-negative isolates collected in Taiwan to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents - SMART 2018-2021.

BACKGROUND: Imipenem/relebactam (IMR) was approved for patient use in Taiwan in 2023. We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in Taiwan hospitals to IMR and comparators with a focus on carbapenem-resistant and KPC-carrying non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, eight hospitals in Taiwan each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative, Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract, and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution. Most isolates that were IMR-, imipenem-, or ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible were screened for ß-lactamase genes by PCR or whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of NME (n = 5063) and 94% of P. aeruginosa (n = 1518) isolates were IMR-susceptible. Percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem ß-lactam comparators, including piperacillin/tazobactam, were 68-79% for NME isolates, while percent susceptible values for all ß-lactam comparators, including meropenem, were 73-81% for P. aeruginosa. IMR retained activity against 93% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) NME and 70% of MDR P. aeruginosa. Sixty-five percent of carbapenem-resistant NME and 81% of KPC-positive NME (n = 80) were IMR-susceptible. IMR inhibited 70% of CRPA (n = 287). Fifty percent of IMR-nonsusceptible NME tested for ß-lactamase carriage had an MBL or OXA-48-like enzyme, whereas most (95%) IMR-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa examined did not carry acquired ß-lactamase genes. CONCLUSION: Based on our in vitro data, IMR may be a useful option for the treatment of hospitalized patients in Taiwan with infections caused by common Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant NME, KPC-positive NME, and CRPA.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C ß-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Objective: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli. Methods: After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Results: The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%). Conclusions: The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

Impact of Acquired Broad Spectrum ß-Lactamases on Susceptibility to Novel Combinations Made of ß-Lactams (Aztreonam, Cefepime, Meropenem, and Imipenem) and Novel ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The impact of broad-spectrum ß-lactamases on the susceptibility to novel ß-lactamase/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations was evaluated both in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli using isogenic backgrounds. Cefepime-zidebactam displayed low MICs, mainly due to the significant intrinsic antibacterial activity of zidebactam. Cefepime-taniborbactam showed excellent activity against recombinant E. coli strains, including metallo-ß-lactamase producers, whereas aztreonam-avibactam remained the best therapeutic option against class B ß-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.

Impact of Minor Carbapenemases on Susceptibility to Novel ß-Lactam/ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations and Cefiderocol in Enterobacterales.

The in vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol was evaluated against both clinical and isogenic enterobacterial isolates producing carbapenemases of the SME, NmcA, FRI, and IMI types. Ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest activity against all tested isolates; imipenem-relebactam showed only moderate activity. All isolates remained susceptible to cefiderocol. Furthermore, avibactam and vaborbactam have greater inhibitory activity than relebactam against the tested carbapenemases. Overall, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and cefiderocol were the most effective therapeutic options for treating infections caused by the tested minor carbapenemase producers.

In vitro potency of xeruborbactam in combination with multiple ß-lactam antibiotics in comparison with other ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations against carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

Recently, several ß-lactam (BL)/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have entered clinical testing or have been marketed for use, but limited direct comparative studies of their in vitro activity exist. Xeruborbactam (XER, also known as QPX7728), which is undergoing clinical development, is a cyclic boronate BLI with potent inhibitory activity against serine (serine ß-lactamase) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs). The objectives of this study were (i) to compare the potency and spectrum of ß-lactamase inhibition by various BLIs in biochemical assays using purified ß-lactamases and in microbiological assays using the panel of laboratory strains expressing diverse serine and metallo-ß-lactamases and (ii) to compare the in vitro potency of XER in combination with multiple ß-lactam antibiotics to that of other BL/BLI combinations in head-to-head testing against recent isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of XER combinations were tested with XER at fixed 4 or 8 µg/mL, and MIC testing was conducted in a blinded fashion using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methods. Xeruborbactam and taniborbactam (TAN) were the only BLIs that inhibited clinically important MBLs. The spectrum of activity of xeruborbactam included several MBLs identified in Enterobacterales, e.g., and various IMP enzymes and NDM-9 that were not inhibited by taniborbactam. Xeruborbactam potency against the majority of purified ß-lactamases was the highest in comparison with other BLIs. Meropenem-xeruborbactam (MEM-XER, fixed 8 µg/mL) was the most potent combination against MBL-negative CRE with MIC90 values of 0.125 µg/mL. MEM-XER and cefepime-taniborbactam (FEP-TAN) were the only BL/BLIs with activity against MBL-producing CREs; with MEM-XER (MIC90 of 1 µg/mL) being at least 16-fold more potent than FEP-TAN (MIC90 of 16 µg/mL). MEM-XER MIC values were ≤8 µg/mL for >90% of CRE, including both MBL-negative and MBL-positive isolates, with FEP-TAN MIC of >8 µg/mL. Xeruborbactam also significantly enhanced potency of other ß-lactam antibiotics, including cefepime, ceftolozane, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, piperacillin, and ertapenem, against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales that carried various class A, class C, and class D extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, including metallo-ß-lactamase-producing isolates. These results strongly support further clinical development of xeruborbactam combinations.

bla KPC-2 overexpression and bla GES-5 carriage as major imipenem/relebactam resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones ST463 and ST235, respectively, in China.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones pose severe threats to public health. Here, we characterize the imipenem/relebactam (IR) resistance mechanisms in P. aeruginosa high-risk clones sequence type 235 (ST235) and ST463 in China. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined, and Illumina short-read sequencing was performed for 1,168 clinical carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) isolates. The gene copy number and expression level were analyzed by Illumina sequencing depth and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, respectively. Resistance conferred by bla GES-5 was evaluated by cloning experiments. ST463 and ST235 accounted for 9.8% (115/1,168) and 4.5% (53/1,168) of total isolates, respectively, and showed high frequencies of extensively drug-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant phenotypes. The overall IR-resistant rate in CRPA was 21.0% (245/1,168). However, the IR resistance rate was 81.7% (94/115) in ST463-PA and 52.8% (28/53) in ST235-PA. Of the ST463 isolates, 92.2% (106/115) were Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa (KPC-PA), and all 94 IR-resistant ST463-PA produced KPC-2. Compared to IR-susceptible ST463 KPC-2-PA, IR-resistant ST463 KPC-2-PA exhibited significantly higher bla KPC-2 copy numbers and expression levels. In ST463 KPC-2-PA, 16 mg/L relebactam resulted in additional fourfold reductions in imipenem MIC50/90 values compared to 4 mg/L relebactam. In ST235, 1.9% (1/53) carried bla IMP carbapenemase and 54.7% (29/53) carried bla GES carbapenemase. Other than the IMP producer, all 27 IR-resistant ST235-PA produced GES-5. Cloning experiments revealed that imipenem resistance in bla GES-5-carrying PAO1 transformants was generally unaffected by relebactam. In conclusion, IR-resistant CRPA isolates in China were mainly distributed in P. aeruginosa high-risk clones ST463 and ST235. The major underlying IR resistance mechanisms were bla KPC-2 overexpression and bla GES-5 carriage.

The in vitro effect of new combinations of carbapenem-ß-lactamase inhibitors for Mycobacterium abscessus.

As new treatment alternatives for Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) are urgently needed, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for novel carbapenem combinations, including imipenem-relebactam and tebipenem-avibactam against 98 MABC isolates by broth microdilution. The MIC50 was reduced from 16 to 8 mg/L by adding relebactam to imipenem, while the addition of avibactam to tebipenem showed a more pronounced reduction from 256 to 16 mg/L, representing a promising non-toxic, oral treatment option for further exploration.

Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify ß-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C ß-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL and from 2 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone. CONCLUSIONS: Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam combinations against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Switzerland.

Carbapenemase-producing in Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a critical health concern worldwide, including in Switzerland, leading to very limited therapeutic options. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the susceptibility to the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam of CPE isolates recovered in Switzerland from 2018 to 2020. A total of 150 clinical CPE were studied including mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 61, 40.3%) and Escherichia coli (n = 53, 35.3%). The distribution of carbapenemases was as follows: KPC-like (32%), OXA-48-like (32%), NDM-like (24%), combinations of carbapenemases (10%), VIM-1 producers (n = 2), and a single IMI-1 producer. Overall, 77% of the strains were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam, 63% was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 62% susceptible to imipenem-relebactam. Those data may contribute to optimize the choice of first line therapy for treating infections due to CPE.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical gram-negative isolates from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland-SMART 2017-2020.

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined for clinical gram-negative isolates from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, where published data for ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is scarce. C/T was active against 94.3% of Enterobacterales, 10-18% higher than the tested cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam. IMI/REL was the most active tested agent against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (99.7% susceptible). C/T was the most active among all studied agents except colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (96.0% susceptible); susceptibility to IMI/REL was 90.7%. C/T maintained activity against 73.7-85.3% of ß-lactam-resistant or multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa subsets. C/T and IMI/REL could represent important treatment options for patients from these countries.

Comparison of the inoculum effect of in vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/relebactam and Ceftazidime/avibactam against ESBL-, KPC- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect of inoculum size of extended-spectrum ß-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing-, AmpC-producing-, and KPC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae on the in vitro antibacterial effects of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA). METHODS: We compared the impact of inoculum size on IMR and CZA of sixteen clinical isolates and three standard isolates through antimicrobial susceptibility tests, time-kill assays and in vitro PK/PD studies. RESULTS: When inoculum size increased from 105 to 107 CFU/mL, an inoculum effect was observed for 26.3% (5/19) and 52.6% (10/19) of IMR and CZA, respectively; time-kill assays revealed that the concentration of CZA increased from ≥ 4 × MIC to 16 × MIC to reach 99.9% killing rate against K. pneumoniae ATCC-BAA 1705 (KPC-2-, OXA-9- and SHV-182-producing) and 60,700 (SHV-27- and DHA-1-producing). While for IMR, a concentration from 1 × MIC to 4 × MIC killed 99.9% of the four strains. When the inoculum size increased to 109 CFU/mL, neither IMR nor CZA showed a detectable antibacterial effect, even at a high concentration. An in vitro PK/PD study revealed a clear bactericidal effect when IMR administered as 1.25 g q6h when inoculum size increased. CONCLUSION: An inoculum effect on CZA was observed more frequent than that on IMR. Among the ß-lactamase-producing strains, the inoculum effect was most common for SHV-producing and KPC-producing strains.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from blood cultures in a University hospital in Serbia.

The study aimed to investigate prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) blood culture isolates and their susceptibility to two new antibiotics, imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Out of 765 isolates recovered from blood cultures in a tertiary care hospital in Serbia between 2020 and 2023, 143 non-repetitive K. pneumoniae strains were included in this study. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the examined antimicrobial drugs was determined by VITEK 2 system, MIC test strip (imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam), and broth microdilution method (tigecycline and colistin). Carbapenemase-encoding genes (blaKPC, blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP) were detected using a multiplex-PCR assay, the BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2-panel. This closed molecular assay is designed for the BioFire® FilmArray® system, enabling automated sample preparation, amplification, detection, and analysis (bioMérieux, France). Results revealed that K. pneumoniae was the most common isolate from blood cultures in 2022. The prevalence of K. pneumoniae was about 11.6% in 2020 and 2021, while in 2022 it raised to over 30%. Also, the frequency of CRKP increased from 11.76% in 2020, through 15.29% in 2021 to 72.94% in 2022. The majority of CRKP carried blaOXA-48-like (60.0%), followed by blaKPC (16.47%), and blaNDM (8.24%) genes, while 14.12% harboured both blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM genes. Only 25.88% of CRKP isolates were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, while 51.76% were resistant to imipenem/relebactam and colistin. The rapid spread of CRKP is particularly concerning because therapeutic options are limited to a few antibiotics. While imipenem/relebactam and colistin showed similar antimicrobial activity against CRKP clinical isolates, ceftazidime/avibactam proved to be the most effective antibiotic.

Takeaways from the Recarbrio Conundrum: Has the FDA Jumped the Gun?

Recarbrio is a novel antibiotic approved by US-FDA. It was initially found to be useful in treating various resistant gram negative infections. A recent investigation revealed lack of methodological and scientific integrity behind the process of FDA approval for this drug. This incident is a lesson for us that we shall not consider FDA clearance as the gold standard before approving any drug in the Indian market or start using it before having adequate data from our own clinical settings.