Melanoma-derived mediators can foster the premetastatic niche: crossroad to lymphatic metastasis.

The natural history of advanced malignant melanoma demonstrates that, in most cases, widespread tumor dissemination is preceded by regional metastases involving tumor-draining lymph nodes [sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs)]. Under physiological conditions, LNs play a central role in immunosurveillance to non-self-antigens to which they are exposed via afferent lymph. The dysfunctional immunity in SLNs is mediated by tumor secretory factors that allow the survival of metastatic melanoma cells within the LN by creating a premetastatic niche (PMN). Recent studies outline the altered microenvironment of LNs shaped by melanoma mediators. Here, we discuss tumor secretory factors involved in subverting tumor immunity and remodeling LNs and highlight emerging therapeutic strategies to reinvigorate antitumoral immunity in SLNs.

Micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer, post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of minimal residual axillary disease, specifically micrometastases, following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) remains largely unexplored. Our study aimed to elucidate the prognostic implications of micrometastases in axillary and sentinel lymph nodes following NST. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed primary breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after NST from September 2006 through February 2018. All patients received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), either with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS)-associated variables were identified using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the 978 patients examined, 438 (44.8%) exhibited no pathologic lymph node involvement (ypN0) after NST, while 89 (9.1%) had micrometastases (ypN1mi) and 451 (46.7%) had macrometastases (ypN+). Notably, 51.1% of the patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases (SLNmi) had additional metastases, nearly triple that of SLN-negative patients (P < 0.001), and 29.8% of SLNmi patients were upstaged with the ALND. Although ypN1mi was not associated with RFS in patients post-NST (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.42-2.49; P = 0.958), SLNmi patients experienced significantly worse RFS compared to SLN-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.12-4.46; P = 0.023). Additional metastases in SLNmi were more prevalent in patients with larger residual breast disease greater than 20 mm, HR-positive/HER2-negative subtype, and low Ki-67 LI (< 14%). CONCLUSIONS: SLNmi is a negative prognostic factor significantly associated with additional non-SLN metastases, while ypN1mi does not influence the prognosis compared to ypN0. Hence, additional ALND may be warranted to confirm axillary nodal status in patients with SLNmi.

Outcomes of sentinel node biopsy according to MRI response in an association with the subtypes in cN1-3 breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in patients with initially high nodal burden. METHODS: In the multicenter retrospective cohort, 388 individuals with cN1-3 breast cancer who underwent NAST and had SLNB followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection were included. In an external validation cohort, 267 patients with HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) meeting similar inclusion criteria were included. Primary outcome was the false-negative rates (FNRs) of SLNB according to the MRI response and subtypes. We defined complete MRI responders as patients who experienced disappearance of suspicious features in the breast and axilla after NAST. RESULTS: In the multicenter retrospective cohort, 130 (33.5%) of 388 patients were of cN2-3, and 55 (14.2%) of 388 patients showed complete MRI responses. In hormone receptor-positive HER2- (n = 207), complete and non-complete responders had a high FNRs (31.3% [95% CI 8.6-54.0] and 20.9% [95% CI 14.1-27.6], respectively). However, in HER2+ or TNBC (n = 181), the FNR of complete MRI responders was 0% (95% CI 0-0), whereas that of non-complete responders was 33.3% (95% CI 20.8-45.9). When we validated our findings in the external cohort with HER2+ or TNBC (n = 267), of which 34.2% were cN2-3, the FNRs of complete were 7.1% (95% CI 0-16.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that SLNB can be a reliable option for nodal status evaluation in selected patients who have responded well to NAST, especially in HER2+ and TNBC patients who show a complete MRI response.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) for axillary mapping in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing mastectomy: single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: Unnecessary axillary surgery can potentially be avoided in patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy. Current guidelines recommend upfront sentinel lymph node biopsy during the index operation due to the potential of upstaging to invasive cancer. This study reviews a single institution's experience with de-escalating axillary surgery using superparamagnetic iron oxide dye for axillary mapping in patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution cross-sectional study. All medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy for a diagnosis of DCIS from August 2021 to January 2023 were reviewed and patients who had SPIO injected at the time of the index mastectomy were included in the study. Descriptive statistics of demographics, clinical information, pathology results, and interval sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed. RESULTS: A total of 41 participants underwent 45 mastectomies for DCIS. The median age of the participants was 58 years (IQR = 17; range 25 to 76 years), and the majority of participants were female (97.8%). The most common indication for mastectomy was diffuse extent of disease (31.7%). On final pathology, 75.6% (34/45) of mastectomy specimens had DCIS without any type of invasion and 15.6% (7/45) had invasive cancer. Of the 7 cases with upgrade to invasive disease, 2 (28.6%) of them underwent interval sentinel lymph node biopsy. All sentinel lymph nodes biopsied were negative for cancer. CONCLUSION: The use of superparamagnetic iron oxide dye can prevent unnecessary axillary surgery in patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy.

Long-term outcome in patients with nodal-positive breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has yet to be accepted as the standard staging procedure in node positive (cN1) breast cancer patients who had clinical complete response in the axilla (cN0) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), due to the presumed high false negative rate associated with SLNB in such scenario. This study aimed to determine whether there is a significant difference in the axillary recurrence rate (ARR) and long-term survival in this group of patients, receiving SLNB alone versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of cN1 patients who were rendered cN0 by NAC from January 2014 to December 2018 were identified from the Asan Medical Center database. Patients' characteristics and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: 902 cN1 patients treated with NAC and turned cN0 were identified. 477 (52.9%) patients achieved complete pathological response in the axilla (ypN0). At a median follow up of 65 months, ARR was 3.2% in the SLNB only group and 1.8% in the ALND group (p = 0.398). DFS and OS were significantly worse in patients with ALND as compared to patients with SLNB only (p = 0.011 and 0.047, respectively). We noted more patients in the ALND group had T3-4 tumor. In the subgroup analysis, we showed that in the T1-2 subgroup (n = 377), there was no statistically significant difference in DFS and OS (p = 0.242 and 0.671, respectively) between SLNB only and ALND group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that cN1 patients who were converted to ypN0 following NAC may be safely treated with SLNB only.

Gene expression profiles in clinically T1-2N0 ER+HER2- breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy: their added value in case sentinel lymph node biopsy is not performed.

PURPOSE: Omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer treatment results in patients with unknown positive nodal status and potential risk for systemic undertreatment. This study aimed to investigate whether gene expression profiles (GEPs) can lower this risk in cT1-2N0 ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients treated with BCT. METHODS: Patients were included if diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 with cT1-2N0 ER+ HER2- breast cancer, treated with BCT and SLNB, and in whom GEP was applied. Adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations based on clinical risk status (Dutch breast cancer guideline of 2020 versus PREDICT v2.1) with and without knowledge on SLNB outcome were compared to GEP outcome. We examined missing adjuvant chemotherapy indications, and the number of GEPs needed to identify one patient at risk for systemic undertreatment. RESULTS: Of 3585 patients, 2863 (79.9%) had pN0 and 722 (20.1%) pN + disease. Chemotherapy was recommended in 1354 (37.8% guideline-2020) and 1888 patients (52.7% PREDICT). Eliminating SLNB outcome (n = 722) resulted in omission of chemotherapy recommendation in 475 (35.1% guideline-2020) and 412 patients (21.8% PREDICT). GEP revealed genomic high risk in 126 (26.5% guideline-2020) and 82 patients (19.9% PREDICT) in case of omitted chemotherapy recommendation in the absence of SLNB. Extrapolated to the whole group, this concerns 3.5% and 2.3%, respectively, resulting in the need for 28-44 GEPs to identify one patient at risk for systemic undertreatment. CONCLUSION: If no SLNB is performed, clinical risk status according to the guideline of 2020 and PREDICT predicts a very low risk for systemic undertreatment. The number of GEPs needed to identify one patient at risk for undertreatment does not justify its standard use.

Use of ultrasound and MRI to stage the axilla for breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to targeted sentinel lymphadenectomy.

PURPOSE: Prior data from this Center demonstrated that for patients who had biopsy-proven axillary metastases, were ycN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and had a wire-directed (targeted) sentinel lymphadenectomy (WD-SLND), 60% were node negative. The hypothesis of this study was that results of axillary imaging either before or after NAC would be predictive of final pathologic status after WD-SLND. METHODS: For patients treated with NAC between 2015 and 2023, ultrasound and MRI images of the axilla were retrospectively reviewed by radiologists specializing in breast imaging, who were blinded to the surgical and pathology results. RESULTS: Of 113 patients who fit the clinical criteria, 66 (58%) were ypN0 at WD-SLND and 34 (30%) had a pathologic complete response to NAC. There was no correlation between the number of abnormal lymph nodes on pre-NAC ultrasound or MRI imaging and the final pathologic status of the lymph nodes. The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal post-NAC axillary imaging was 48% for ultrasound and 53% for MRI. The negative predictive value (NPV) for normal post-NAC axillary imaging was 67% for ultrasound and 68% for MRI. CONCLUSION: The results of axillary imaging were not adequate to identify lymph nodes after NAC that were persistently pathologically node positive or those which had become pathologically node negative.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of fluorescein-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes status in cN0 axilla is performed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) utilizing a combination of radioactive isotope and blue dye or alternative to isotope like Indocyanine green (ICG). Both are very resource-intensive; which has prompted development of low-cost technique of Fluorescein Sodium (FS)-guided SLNB. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the diagnostic performance of FS-guided SLNB in early breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FS for sentinel lymph node biopsy. METHODS: Eligibility criteria: Studies where SLNB was performed using FS. INFORMATION SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and online clinical trial registers. Risk of bias: Articles were assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: The main summary measures were pooled Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rate (SLN-IR) and pooled False Negative Rate (FNR) using random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 45 articles were retrieved by the initial systematic search. 7 out of the 45 studies comprising a total of 332 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled SLN-IR was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.97; 87% to 97%). Five validation studies were included for pooling the false negative rate and included a total of 211 patients. The pooled FNR was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-9.07). CONCLUSION: Fluorescein-guided SLNB is a viable option for detection of lymph node metastases in clinically node negative patients with early breast cancer. It achieves a high pooled Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rate (SLN-IR) of 93% with a false negative rate of 5.6% for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis.

Characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis of microinvasive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To select patients who would benefit most from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by investigating the characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 1688 patients with MIBC who underwent breast surgery with axillary staging at the Asan Medical Center from 1995 to 2020. RESULTS: Most patients underwent SLNB alone (83.5%). Seventy (4.1%) patients were node-positive, and the majority had positive lymph nodes < 10 mm, with micro-metastases occurring frequently (n = 37; 55%). Node-positive patients underwent total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) more than breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and SLNB compared with node-negative patients (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of ALNM included young age [odds ratio (OR) 0.959; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.927-0.993; p = 0.019], ALND (OR 11.486; 95% CI 5.767-22.877; p < 0.001), number of lymph nodes harvested (≥ 5) (OR 3.184; 95% CI 1.555-6.522; p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (OR 6.831; 95% CI 2.386-19.557; p < 0.001), presence of multiple microinvasion foci (OR 2.771; 95% CI 1.329-5.779; p = 0.007), prominent lymph nodes in preoperative imaging (OR 2.675; 95% CI 1.362-5.253; p = 0.004), and hormone receptor positivity (OR 2.491; 95% CI 1.230-5.046; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Low ALNM rate (4.1%) suggests that routine SLNB for patients with MIBC is unnecessary but can be valuable for patients with specific risk factors. Ongoing trials for omitting SLNB in early breast cancer, and further subanalyses focusing on rare populations with MIBC are necessary.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN0 breast cancer patients: impact on axillary morbidity and survival-a propensity score cohort study.

PURPOSE: In patients with clinically lymph node-negative (cN0) breast cancer, performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been preferentially embraced in comparison to before NACT. However, survival outcomes associated with both strategies remain understudied. We aimed to compare the axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), between two strategies. METHODS: We included 310 patients in a retrospective observational study. SNLB was performed before NACT from December 2006 to April 2014 (107 cases) and after NACT from May 2014 to May 2020 (203 patients). An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was applied to homogenize both groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and odd ratios (OR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: The lymphadenectomy rate was 29.9% before NACT and 7.4% after NACT (p < 0.001), with an OR of 5.35 95%CI (2.7-10.4); p = .002. After 4 years of follow-up, SLNB after NACT was associated with lower risk for DFS, HR 0.42 95%CI (0.17-1.06); p = 0.066 and better OS, HR 0.21 CI 95% (0.07-0.67); p = 0.009 than SLNB before NACT. After multivariate analysis, independent adverse prognostic factors for OS included SLNB before NACT, HR 3.095 95%CI (2.323-4.123), clinical nonresponse to NACT, HR 1.702 95% CI (1.012-2.861), and small tumors (cT1) with high proliferation index, HR 1.889 95% (1.195-2.985). CONCLUSION: Performing SLNB before NACT results in more ALND and has no benefit for patient survival. These findings support discontinuing the practice of SLNB before NACT in patients with cN0 breast cancer.

Omission of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes.

PURPOSE: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Z11) trial assessed the benefit of axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases; however, Z11 excluded patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. We analyzed trends in ALND omission in patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. METHODS: Women with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy between 2018 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database were included using SLN codes initiated in 2018. Patients with stage IV disease, recurrent breast cancer, and who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine the proportion who received ALND and factors associated with ALND omission. A subgroup analysis was performed among patients who met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria (BCS, T1/T2 breast cancer). RESULTS: We identified 3654 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. ALND was omitted in 37% of patients, and omission significantly increased from 2018 to 2020 (29% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). Older age, lower grade tumors, no radiation, non-academic facility, BCS, more SLNs examined and fewer positive SLNs were significantly associated with ALND omission. 942 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria. ALND was omitted in 49% of these patients, and omission increased from 2018 to 2020 (44% vs. 49%, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs do not undergo ALND; omission of ALND increased from 2018 to 2020. Studies assessing oncologic outcomes of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who do and do not receive ALND are required.

A Four-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial of Topical Pain Control for Sentinel Node Radiotracer Injections in Patients with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radioactive tracer injections for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping can be painful. In this randomized trial, we compared four approaches to topical pain control for radiotracer injections. METHODS: Breast cancer patients were randomized (9 April 2021-8 May 2022) to receive the institutional standard of ice prior to injection (n = 44), or one of three treatments: ice plus a vibrating distraction device (Buzzy®; n = 39), 4% lidocaine patch (n = 44), or 4% lidocaine patch plus ice plus Buzzy® (n = 40). Patients completed the Wong-Baker FACES® pain score (primary outcome) and a satisfaction with pain control received scale (secondary). Nuclear medicine technologists (n = 8) rated perceived pain control and ease of administration for each patient. At study conclusion, technologists rank-ordered treatments. Data were analyzed as intention-to-treat. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare pain scores of control versus pooled treatment arms (primary) and then control to each treatment arm individually (secondary). RESULTS: There were no differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups, both pooled and individually. Eighty-five percent of patients were 'satisfied/very satisfied' with treatment received, with no differences between groups. No differences in providers' perceptions of pain were observed, although providers perceived treatments involving Buzzy© more difficult to administer (p < 0.001). Providers rated lidocaine patch as the easiest, with ice being second. CONCLUSION: In this randomized trial, no differences in patient-reported pain or satisfaction with treatment was observed between ice and other topical treatments. Providers found treatments using Buzzy® more difficult to administer. Given patient satisfaction and ease of administration, ice is a reasonable standard.

The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed less often for older patients with melanoma. We investigated the association of SLNB and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in the elderly. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER: 2010-2019) for patients ≥ 70 years with cT2-4N0M0 melanoma. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of SLNB performance and SLN status on MSS at increasing age cutoffs. In addition, we evaluated the association of different factors with SLNB performance using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 11,548 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy occurred in 6754 (58.5%) patients, 1050 (15.5%) of whom had a positive SLN. On adjusted SEER analysis, a negative SLN was independently associated with improved MSS (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.67) for patients up to 87 years old. Positive SLNB was independently associated with inferior MSS (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.93-1.98). Increasing age groups were significantly associated with decreased SLNB performance. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with cancer-specific survival and adds prognostic information for elderly patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performance should not be eliminated in elderly patients based on age alone, unless justified by poor performance status, patient preference, or other surgical contraindications. Decreased SLNB performance with increasing age in our cohort may indicate a missed therapeutic opportunity in the care of elderly patients with melanoma.

Using Nomograms Wisely: Predicting Sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Four externally validated sentinel node biopsy (SNB) prediction nomograms exist for malignant melanoma that each incorporate different clinical and histopathologic variables, which can result in substantially different risk estimations for the same patient. We demonstrate this variability by using hypothetical melanoma cases. METHODS: We compared the MSKCC and MIA calculators. Using a random number generator, 300 hypothetical thin melanoma "patients" were created with varying age, tumor thickness, Clark level, location on the body, ulceration, melanoma subtype, mitosis, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The chi-square test was used to detect statistically significant differences in risk estimations between nomograms. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the most relevant contributing pathologic features in cases where the predictions diverged by > 10%. RESULTS: Of 300 randomly generated cases, 164 were deleted as their clinical scenarios were unlikely. The MSKCC nomogram generally calculated a lower risk than the MIA (p < 0.001). The highest risk score attained for any "patient" using MSKCC calculator was 15% achieved in one of 136 patients (0.7%), whereas using the MIA nomogram, 58 of 136 patients (43%, p < 0.001) had predicted risk >15%. Regression analysis on patients with >10% difference between nomograms revealed LVI (26, p < 0.001), mitosis (14, p < 0.001), and melanoma subtype (8, p < 0.001) were the factors with high coefficients within MIA that were not present in MSKCC. CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms are useful tools when predicting SNB risk but provide risk outputs that are quite sensitive to included predictors.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Older Patients: Does SLNB Guide Therapy?

BACKGROUND: Older breast cancer patients represent a heterogeneous population. Studies demonstrate that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission may be appropriate in some clinical scenarios, yet patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are often excluded from these studies. This study evaluated differences in treatment and survival for older patients with TNBC based on SLNB receipt and result. METHODS: Patients 70 years old or older with a diagnosis of cT1-2/cN0/M0 TNBC (2010-2019) who underwent surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression estimated the association of SLNB with therapy, and Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association of SLNB with overall survival (OS) after adjustment for select factors. RESULTS: Of the 15,167 patients included in the study (median age, 77 years), 13.02% did not undergo SLNB, 5.14% had pN1 disease, 0.12% had pN2 disease, and 0.01% had pN3 disease. Most of the patients (83.9%) underwent surgery first, and 16.1% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those who underwent surgery first and SLNB, 6.2% had pN+ disease. Receipt of SLNB was associated with a higher likelihood of chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-2.21), regardless of pN status. Compared with those who did not undergo a SLNB, a negative SLNB was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.63-0.75), although there was no difference for a positive SLNB (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.98-1.34). The patients receiving chemotherapy first showed no difference in survival based on SLNB receipt or result (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients with TNBC do not have nodal involvement and do not receive chemotherapy. The receipt and results of SLNB may be associated with outcomes for some who undergo surgery first, but not for those who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Clipping the Positive Lymph Node in Patients with Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on Axillary Surgery in the ISPY-2 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), retrieving previously clipped, biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy [i.e., targeted axillary dissection (TAD)] may reduce false negative rates. However, the overall utilization and impact of clipping positive nodes remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cN+ ISPY-2 patients (2011-2022) undergoing axillary surgery after NAC. We evaluated trends in node clipping and associations with type of axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node (SLN) only, SLN and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or ALND only] and event-free survival (EFS) in patients that were cN+ on a NAC trial. RESULTS: Among 801 cN+ patients, 161 (20.1%) had pre-NAC clip placement in the positive node. The proportion of patients that were cN+ undergoing clip placement increased from 2.4 to 36.2% between 2011 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression showed nodal clipping was independently associated with higher odds of SLN-only surgery [odds ratio (OR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-6.8, p < 0.001]. This was also true among patients with residual pathologically node-positive (pN+) disease. Completion ALND rate did not differ based on clip retrieval success. No significant differences in EFS were observed in those with or without clip placement, both with or without successful clip retrieval [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.4-1.7, p = 0.7; HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5-6.0, p = 0.3, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Clip placement in the positive lymph node before NAC is increasingly common. The significant association between clip placement and omission of axillary dissection, even among patients with pN+ disease, suggests a paradigm shift toward TAD as a definitive surgical management strategy in patients with pN+ disease after NAC.

Utility of Axillary Staging in Older Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older patients remains controversial. Advancements in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy have revolutionized disease response rates and prognosis, supporting efforts to re-evaluate the utility of SLNB. We aimed to assess the differences in treatment and overall survival (OS) in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on SLNB. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2020), patients ≥ 70 years of age diagnosed with cT1-2/cN0/M0, HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Logistic regression assessed associations with SLNB, systemic therapy, and radiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with OS. Analyses were stratified by treatment sequence, i.e. upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgery. RESULTS: Of the 17,609 patients included, 94% underwent upfront surgery (n = 16,492) and the remaining underwent NAT (n = 1117). Those who underwent SLNB were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, irrespective of nodal status {upfront surgery/systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.67); upfront surgery/radiation (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.03-5.21); NAT/radiation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.83-17.69)}. The breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was highest among the hormone receptor (HR)-negative/HER2-positive subtype (50.0%), of which none were found to be ypN+. Comorbidity burden was associated with significantly lower rates of adjuvant systemic therapy and worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent SLNB, regardless of pN status, were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. Nodal positivity is exceedingly rare for patients with a breast pCR following NAT, especially among the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype. It is reasonable to consider omission of SLNB in select subgroups of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Interdisciplinary Implementation of a Synoptic Reporting Template for Melanoma Nodal Surveillance Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: With nodal surveillance increasingly used for sentinel lymph node-positive (SLN+) melanoma following the Second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II), high-quality nodal ultrasonography (U/S) has become a critical need. Previous work has demonstrated low utilization of MSLT-II U/S criteria to define abnormal lymph nodes requiring intervention or biopsy. To address this gap, an evidence-based synoptic template was designed and implemented in this single-center study. METHODS: Sentinel lymph node-positive patients undergoing nodal surveillance at a tertiary cancer center from July 2017 to June 2023 were identified retrospectively. Ultrasound reporting language was analyzed for MSLT-II criteria reported and clinically actionable recommendations (e.g., normal, abnormal with recommendation for biopsy). Following a multidisciplinary design process, the synoptic template was implemented in January 2023. Postimplementation outcomes were evaluated by using U/S reports and provider surveys. RESULTS: A total of 337 U/S studies were performed on 94 SLN+ patients, with a median of 3 U/S per patient (range 1-12). Among 42 synoptic-eligible U/S performed postimplementation, 32 U/S (76.0%) were reported synoptically. Significant increases were seen in the number of MSLT-II criteria reported (Pre 0.5 ± 0.8 vs. Post 2.5 ± 1.0, p < 0.001), and clinically actionable recommendations for abnormal findings (Pre 64.0% vs. Post 93.0%, p = 0.04). Nearly all surgeon and radiologist survey respondents were "very" or "completely" satisfied with the clinical utility of the synoptic template (90.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a synoptic template, U/S reports were significantly more likely to document MSLT-II criteria and provide an actionable recommendation, increasing usefulness to providers. Efforts to disseminate this synoptic template to other centers are ongoing.

Feasibility of Regional Lymphadenectomy for Stomach-Preserving Surgery in Early Gastric Cancer Omitting Sentinel Node Navigation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SENORITA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node navigation (SNN) has been known as the effective treatment for stomach-preserving surgery in early gastric cancer; however, SNN presents several technical difficulties in real practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of regional lymphadenectomy omitting SNN, using the post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Using data from the SENORITA trial that compared laparoscopic standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic SNN, 237 patients who underwent SNN were included in this study. Tumor location was divided into longitudinal and circumferential directions. According to the location of the tumor, the presence or absence of lymph node (LN) metastases between sentinel and non-sentinel basins were analyzed. Proposed regional LN stations were defined as the closest area to the primary tumor. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values (NPV) of SNN and regional lymphadenectomy were compared. RESULTS: Metastasis to non-sentinel basins with tumor-free in sentinel basins was observed in one patient (0.4%). The rate of LN metastasis to non-regional LN stations without regional LN metastasis was 2.5% (6/237). The sensitivity and NPV of SNN were found to be significantly higher than those of regional lymphadenectomy (96.8% vs. 80.6% [p = 0.016] and 99.5% vs. 97.2% [p = 0.021], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that regional lymphadenectomy for stomach-preserving surgery, omitting SNN, was insufficient; therefore, SNN is required in stomach-preserving surgery.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is a critical prognostic factor for patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has the potential to identify the initial site of draining lymph node metastasis and reduce the extent of surgical lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping in GC. METHODS: The study enrolled 129 GC patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and indocyanine green fluorescence-guided SLN mapping. The primary outcomes were the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of SLN mapping. The secondary outcomes were clinicopathologic factors associated with SLN mapping accuracy and successful SLN mapping. RESULTS: The SLN detection rate in this study was 86.8 %. The study had an overall NPV of 83.1 % and an overall sensitivity of 65.8 %. The NPV was found to be significantly higher in the patients with no lymphovascular invasion (LVI) than in those with LVI (96.0 % vs 59.3 %; p < 0.001) and in the patients whose pathologic T (pT) stage lower than 3 than in those whose T stage was 3 or higher (92.0 % vs 66.7 %; p = 0.009). The sensitivity of SLN mapping was 50 % in the patients with no LVI and 33 % in the patients with a pT stage lower than 3. CONCLUSION: The study results showed that for patients with early-stage GC with no LVI, negative SLN findings may represent a potential additive predictor indicating the absence of regional LN metastasis. However, given the low sensitivity rates noted, further research is needed to identify specific patient populations that may benefit from SLN mapping in GC.