Treatment-related pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD­1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V5-V50, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP. RESULTS: 46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V5, V10, V15, V25, V30, V35, V40 and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V5 (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V5 threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD­1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD­1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V5 were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V5 below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Radiation pneumonitis after concurrent aumolertinib and thoracic radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The superior efficacy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been proven in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) reduced by concurrent TRT and TKIs has attracted widespread attention. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the rate and risk factors for RP in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with aumolertinib and TRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients treated with concurrent aumolertinib and TRT between May 2020 and December 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed by two senior radiologists and then graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 RP was 42.9%. Grade 2 and 3 RP were observed in 28.6% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 to 5 RP were not observed. the gross total volume (GTV) ≥ 21 ml and ipsilateral lung V20 ≥ 25% were risk factors for RP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group were 23.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Better local control is achieved with concurrent TRT and aumolertinib, and special attention should be given to controlling ipsilateral lung V20 and GTV to reduce the risk of RP.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor versus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has revolutionized the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, clinical trials suggest differential efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents versus anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC in real-world practice. METHODS: Patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide combined with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 agents as first-line treatment in different centers of PLA General Hospital between January 2017 and October 2021 were included for this study. Survival outcomes and safety were compared between patients receiving anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 agents. RESULTS: Of the total 154 included patients, 68 received anti-PD-1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-1 group), and 86 received anti-PD-L1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-8.2 months) and 17.4 months (95% CI: 15.3-19.3 months), respectively. Median PFS and OS were comparable between the PD-1 group and PD-L1 group (PFS: 7.6 months vs. 8.3 months, HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.79-1.62, p = 0.415; OS: 26.9 months vs. 25.6 months, HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63-1.47, p = 0.859. The objective response rate and disease control rate were comparable between the two groups: 79.4% vs. 79.1% and 92.6% vs. 94.2%, respectively. The 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month PFS and OS rates were slightly higher in the PD-L1 group than in the PD-1 group, while the 24-month PFS rate was slightly higher in the PD-1 group than in the PD-L1 group. Stratified analysis showed that locoregional thoracic radiotherapy and normal lactate dehydrogenase level were independent predictors of better OS in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus ICI. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC are comparably effective and well tolerated.

First-site-metastasis pattern in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune check-point inhibition: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). METHODS: We defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: 136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with ≥ 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001). Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016). For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV ≥ 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 ≥ 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027). After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 ≥ 30 and GTV ≥ 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV ≥ 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not.

Is consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer still beneficial in the era of immunotherapy? A retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) carries a dismal prognosis. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TR) after first-line chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors in this setting remains unclear. As TR can improve overall survival (OS) after conventional chemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed OS of an inhouse cohort treated either with TR or with chemoimmunotherapy alone. METHODS: A total of 41 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab or durvalumab) for ES-SCLC at our hospital since 2019 were analyzed. TR was administered in 10 fractions of 3 Gy. Patient characteristics, number of immunotherapy cycles received, brain irradiation, and presence of hepatic and cerebral metastasis at diagnosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was OS after first diagnosis. RESULTS: Consolidative TR was associated with a significantly longer OS than systemic therapy alone (1-year OS 78.6% and 2­year OS 37.1% vs. 1­year OS 39.7% and 2 years not reached, p = 0.019). With regard to radiotherapy indication, survival at 1 year was 88.9% (log-rank p = 0.016) for patients receiving consolidative TR. For patients receiving TR in case of progression, 1­year survival was 66.7%. Hepatic and cerebral metastasis at first diagnosis had no significant effect on OS. CONCLUSION: TR was significantly associated with longer OS. The survival benefit of TR was most pronounced for consolidative radiotherapy after initial chemoimmunotherapy compared to TR in case of progression. Although retrospective findings need to be interpreted with caution, in the absence of prospective data, our findings provide a basis for offering consolidative TR in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Survival of Patients With Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Baseline Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction: Impacts of Thoracic Radiotherapy and Predictive Analysis for Acute Radiation Pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with lung cancer with deteriorated pulmonary function. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with baseline severe pulmonary dysfunction and severe acute radiation pneumonitis (SARP). METHODS: Patients were categorized into a radiotherapy group and a nonradiotherapy group, followed by analysis of clinical variables. A Cox regression was used to evaluate the impact of various factors on overall survival (OS). Each SARP factor's predictive value was assessed using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The median OS in the radiotherapy group was 21.6 months vs 8.9 months in the nonradiotherapy group. Cox analysis revealed that chemotherapy (HR, 0.221; 95% CI, 0.149-0.329; P < .001) and radiotherapy (HR, 0.589; 95% CI, 0.399-0.869; P = .008) are independent prognostic factors for the current cohort. The data suggested that the ipsilateral lung V10 (ilV10, the percentage of the lung volume that received more than 10 Gy) was an independent predictor of SARP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that thoracic radiotherapy might be associated with clinical benefits to inoperable NSCLC in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction and that ilV10 may be involved in the prediction of risk for SARP in these patients.

Clinical outcomes and toxicities of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with early thoracic radiation therapy after induction chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and toxicities between induction chemotherapy (IC) + chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and CRT alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), to explore the appropriate thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) timing after IC and to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: 450 ESCC patients were included from September 2011 to December 2020, 238 of whom received IC/CRT. Propensity score matching was performed to balance potential confounders between the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Patients who received IC/CRT experienced improved overall survival (OS) (38.5 vs. 28.8 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) (41.0 vs. 22.0 months) before matching, with similar results after matching. In the IC/CRT group, early TRT had more favorable survival than late TRT both matching before and after. In subgroup analysis, early TRT combination concurrent chemotherapy had better OS and PFS than late TRT combination concurrent chemotherapy. In addition, early TRT had better survival benefits regardless of the N stage. Notably, the IC/CRT group and early TRT group had manageable toxicities reaction compared with CRT alone group and the late TRT group. The nomogram was developed to predict the OS and PFS based on multivariate analysis results. The C-index was 0.743 and 0.722, respectively. CONCLUSION: IC/CRT and early TRT could yield satisfactory clinical outcomes and controllable toxicities in locally advanced ESCC. The IC plus early concurrent CRT might be a promising treatment strategy for improving further survival in ESCC.

Pooled analysis on image-guided moderately hypofractionated thoracic irradiation in inoperable node-positive/recurrent patients with non-small cell lung cancer with poor prognostic factors and severely limited pulmonary function and reserve.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of image-guided moderately hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy (hypo-IGRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with poor performance status and severely limited pulmonary function and reserve. METHODS: Consecutive inoperable patients who had node-positive, stage IIB-IIIC (TNM, 8th edition) or recurrent NSCLC, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1, and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) ≤1.0 L, had a single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO-SB) ≤40% and/or on long-term oxygen therapy were analyzed. All patients received hypofractionated IGRT to a total dose of 42.0 to 49.0 Gy/13 to 16 fractions (2.8-3.5 Gy/fraction) (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions/biologically effective dose [α/ß = 10] = 45.5-55.1 Gy/54.6-66.2 Gy) alone. Patients were monitored closely for nonhematological toxicity, which was classified per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2021, 47 consecutive patients with a median age of 72 years (range, 52.2-88 years) were treated. At baseline, the median FEV1 , vital capacity, and DLCO-SB were 1.17 L (range, 0.69-2.84 L), 2.34 L (range, 1.23-3.74 L), and 35% predicted (range, 13.3%-69.0%), respectively. The mean and median planning target volumes were 410.8 cc (SD, 267.1 cc) and 315.4 cc (range, 83.4-1174.1 cc). With a median follow-up of 28.9 months (range, 0.5-90.6 months) after RT, the median progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) and 6- and 12-month PFS/OS rates were 10.4 months (95% CI, 7-13.8 months)/18.3 months (95% CI, 9.2-27.4 months), 70%/89.4%, and 38.8%/66%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated with only 1 case each of grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis. No toxicity greater than grade 3 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inoperable node-positive NSCLC, a poor performance status, and severely limited lung function can be safely and effectively treated with individualized moderately hypofractionated IGRT. The achieved survival rates for this highly multimorbid group of patients were encouraging.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts brain metastasis and survival in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a high risk of brain metastasis and poor survival. This study aims to assess the prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 197 consecutive patients who underwent TRT and PCI for LS-SCLC between November 2005 and October 2017. Both pretreatment and maximal serum LDH levels (mLDH) during treatment were checked, and an increased LDH level was defined as more than 240 IU/ml. Clinical factors were tested for associations with intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) and overall survival (OS) after PCI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify variables associated with survival. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 28 had higher pretreatment LDH levels and mLDH levels were increased in 95 patients during treatment. In patients in the normal and elevated mLDH groups, the 1­, 2­, and 5­year IPFS rates were 96.7% vs. 90.1%, 91.7% vs. 73.8%, and 87.8% vs. 61.0% (P < 0.01), respectively. Compared to those with normal LDH levels, patients with increased mLDH levels had a higher cumulative risk of intracranial metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-8.63; P < 0.01) and worse overall survival (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.67-4.04; P < 0.01). The factors LDH level at baseline or changes between pretreatment level and maximum level during treatment failed to predict brain metastases or OS with statistical significance. In the multivariate analyses, both mLDH during treatment (HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.57-7.92; P = 0.002) and patient age ≥ 60 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.22-4.94; P = 0.012) were independently associated with worse IPFS. Factors significantly associated with worse OS included mLDH during treatment (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.56-3.86; P < 0.001), IIIB stage (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.06-2.88; P = 0.029), and conventional radiotherapy applied in TRT (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.04-2.65; P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: The mLDH level during treatment predicts brain metastasis and survival in LS-SCLC patients treated with TRT and PCI, which may provide valuable information for identifying patients with poor survival outcomes and possible candidates for treatment intensification.

Protocol of the TREASURE study: Thoracic RadiothErapy with Atezolizumab in Small cell lUng canceR Extensive disease - a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the combination of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor atezolizumab with first-line chemotherapy has demonstrated to improve outcome for patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), leading to approval of this regimen. At the same time, accumulating (pre-)clinical data suggest synergisms of radiotherapy and immunotherapy via the radiation-mediated induction of anti-tumor immunogenicity. Combining the recent findings, the TREASURE trial aims at further enhancing response to upfront chemo-immunotherapy by the addition of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). METHODS/DESIGN: The TREASURE trial is a randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04462276). One hundred four patients suffering from extensive disease (ED) SCLC, with any response to the standard of care induction chemo-immunotherapy will be randomized to receive atezolizumab maintenance therapy with or without TRT. The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include further measures of efficacy, safety, and the collection of biomarker samples. A safety interim analysis will take place after n = 23 patients receiving TRT have been observed for three months after the end of TRT. DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate whether treatment efficacy can be improved by adding TRT to atezolizumab maintenance therapy in ED SCLC patients with any response after chemo-immunotherapy. Safety and feasibility of such a regimen will be evaluated, and biomaterials for a translational research project will be collected. Together, the results of this trial will deepen our comprehension of how checkpoint inhibition and radiotherapy interact and contribute to the evolving landscape of SCLC therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04462276 (Date of initial registration: 8th July 2020), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04462276 Eudra-CT Number: 2019-003916-29 (Date of initial registration: 30th March 2020), https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-003916-29/DE.

Development and validation of a nomogram for assessing survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients with superior vena cava syndrome referred for thoracic radiotherapy: a comparison of upfront vs. consolidative approaches.

PURPOSE: This study sought to design and validate a nomogram capable of predicting outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) based upon the timing of their radiotherapy treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 175 ES-SCLC patients with SCVS, comparing outcomes between those that underwent upfront thoracic radiotherapy (initial radiotherapy with simultaneous chemotherapy) and those that underwent consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (following 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy). Significant predictors of patient outcomes were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model and were used to construct our nomogram. This model was subsequently validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, concordance index (C-index) values, and a risk classification system in order to evaluate its discriminative and predictive accuracy. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients with SVCS that underwent chemotherapy (CT), consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cc-TRT), and upfront thoracic radiotherapy (cu-TRT) was 8.2, 11.7, and 14.9 months, respectively (p < 0.001), with respective progression-free survival (PFS) durations of 3.3, 5.0, and 7.3 months (p < 0.001). A multivariate regression analysis revealed age, gender, ECOG performance status, sites of tumor metastasis, and treatment approach to all be independent predictors of survival outcomes. A nomogram was therefore developed incorporating these factors. C­index values upon internal and external validation of this nomogram were 0.7625 and 0.7959, respectively, and ROC and calibration curves revealed this model to be accurate and consistent. CONCLUSIONS: We found that upfront thoracic radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy may be associated with a positive impact on outcomes in ES-SCLC patients with SVCS.

Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies.

PURPOSE: The optimal radiotherapy dose/fraction for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is undefined. Our objectives were to compare efficacy between hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; 1.5 Gy 2 times per day [bid] in 30 fractions) and hypofractionated TRT (2.5 Gy once per day [qd] in 22 fractions), and to explore prognostic factors influencing the prognosis, such as the timing of TRT. METHODS: Patients enrolled in two independent prospective studies were combined and analyzed. The primary endpoint was local/regional control (LRC). The prognosis was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Ninety-two and 96 patients were treated with hyperfractionated TRT and hypofractionated TRT, respectively. The 1­ and 2­year LRC rates of the two arms were 82.1 and 60.7%, and 84.9 and 68.8% (P = 0.27), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) times (months) were 28.3 (95% confidence interval, CI 16.4-40.1) and 22.0 (95% CI 16.4-27.5), while the 1­year, 3­year, and 5­year OS rates were 85.2, 40.8, and 27.1%, and 76.9, 34.3, and 26.8% (P = 0.37), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression study, time (days) from the initiation of chemotherapy to TRT (TCT) ≤43 was associated with improved LRC (hazard radio, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76; P = 0.005). Time (days) from the start of chemotherapy to the end of TRT (SER) ≤63 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P = 0.003) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.63; P = 0.000) were favorably related to OS. Grade 2/3 acute radiation esophagitis was observed in 37.0 and 17.7% of patients in the hyperfractionated and hypofractionated arms, respectively (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Both hyperfractionated and hypofractionated TRT schedules achieved good LRC and OS for patients with limited-stage SCLC in this study. Keeping TCT ≤43 and SER ≤63 resulted in a better prognosis. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the hyperfractionated arm.

Cardiac toxicity of lung cancer radiotherapy.

Radical radiotherapy of lung cancer with dose escalation has been associated with increased tumor control. However, these attempts to continually improve local control through dose escalation, have met mixed results culminating in the findings of the RTOG trial 0617, where the heart dose was associated with a worse overall survival, indicating a significant contribution to radiation-induced cardiac morbidity. It is, therefore, very likely that poorly understood cardiac toxicity may have offset any potential improvement in overall survival derived from dose escalation and may be an obstacle that limits disease control and survival of patients. The manifestations of cardiac toxicity are relatively common after high dose radiotherapy of advanced lung cancers and are independently associated with both heart dose and baseline cardiac risk. Toxicity following the treatment may occur earlier than previously thought and, therefore, heart doses should be minimized. In patients with lung cancer, who not only receive substantial heart dose, but are also older with more comorbidities, all cardiac events have the potential to be clinically significant and life-threatening. Sophisticated radiation treatment planning techniques, charged particle therapy, and modern imaging methods in radiotherapy planning, may lead to reduction of the heart dose, which could potentially improve the clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Efforts should be made to minimize heart radiation exposure whenever possible even at doses lower than those generally recommended. Heart doses should be limited as much as possible. A heart dosimetry as a whole is important for patient outcomes, rather than emphasizing just one parameter.

Interstitial pneumonitis in a castration-resistant prostate cancer patient receiving cabazitaxel after thoracic radiation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial pneumonitis is a rare reaction in a previously irradiated area of pulmonary or thoracic lesion after treatment with anticancer drugs such as taxanes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man presented with a fever and dyspnea after treatment with cabazitaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer. He was treated with an intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent, however he complained of dyspnea and had a pulse oximetric saturation of 80% while breathing room air. The patients had been treated for bone metastases with 37.5 Gy to the thoracic spine (Th 7) as a local radiotherapy. Radiological images showed pulmonary interstitial opacities in the irradiated field of the both lungs. The steroid pulse therapy was started. The patient's dyspnea disappeared and the interstitial opacities had also improved. CONCLUSIONS: This report is a case of interstitial pneumonitis in a castration-resistant prostate cancer patient receiving cabazitaxel after thoracic radiation therapy.

Dyadic yoga program for patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy and their family caregivers: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may result in toxicities that are associated with performance declines and poor quality of life (QOL) for patients and their family caregivers. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to establish feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a dyadic yoga (DY) intervention as a supportive care strategy. METHODS: Patients with stage I to III non-small cell lung or esophageal cancer undergoing TRT and their caregivers (N = 26 dyads) were randomized to a 15-session DY or a waitlist control (WLC) group. Prior to TRT and randomization, both groups completed measures of QOL (SF-36) and depressive symptoms (CES-D). Patients also completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Dyads were reassessed on the last day of TRT and 3 months later. RESULTS: A priori feasibility criteria were met regarding consent (68%), adherence (80%), and retention (81%) rates. Controlling for relevant covariates, multilevel modeling analyses revealed significant clinical improvements for patients in the DY group compared with the WLC group for the 6MWT (means: DY = 473 m vs WLC = 397 m, d = 1.19) and SF-36 physical function (means: DY = 38.77 vs WLC = 30.88; d = .66) and social function (means: DY = 45.24 vs WLC = 39.09; d = .44) across the follow-up period. Caregivers in the DY group reported marginally clinically significant improvements in SF-36 vitality (means: DY = 53.05 vs WLC = 48.84; d = .39) and role performance (means: DY = 52.78 vs WLC = 48.59; d = .51) relative to those in the WLC group. CONCLUSIONS: This novel supportive care program appears to be feasible and beneficial for patients undergoing TRT and their caregivers. A larger efficacy trial with a more stringent control group is warranted.

Single-institution experience of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma at University of Catania.

AIM: The multimodal approach to malignant pleural mesothelioma is gradually becoming the standard of care for this disease in patients with good performance status. Materials & methods: We report our experience concerning eight cases treated with the use of static step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the whole pleural cavity, in patients already undergoing surgical and/or antiblastic therapy. Results & conclusion: Results at a median follow-up of 16 months showed a median survival from the initial treatment of 29 months, with lung toxicity of grade II reported only in two patients.

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy (CT) combined with radiotherapy is the standard treatment of 'limited-stage' small-cell lung cancer. However, controversy persists over the optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy and CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomized trials comparing earlier versus later radiotherapy, or shorter versus longer radiotherapy duration, as defined in each trial. We combined the results from trials using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Twelve trials with 2668 patients were eligible. Data from nine trials comprising 2305 patients were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 10 years. When all trials were analysed together, 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy did not affect overall survival. However, the HR for overall survival was significantly in favour of 'earlier or shorter' radiotherapy among trials with a similar proportion of patients who were compliant with CT (defined as having received 100% or more of the planned CT cycles) in both arms (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), and in favour of 'later or longer' radiotherapy among trials with different rates of CT compliance (HR 1.19, 1.05-1.34, interaction test, P < 0.0001). The absolute gain between 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy in 5-year overall survival for similar and for different CT compliance trials was 7.7% (95% CI 2.6-12.8%) and -2.2% (-5.8% to 1.4%), respectively. However, 'earlier or shorter' thoracic radiotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of severe acute oesophagitis than 'later or longer' radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: 'Earlier or shorter' delivery of thoracic radiotherapy with planned CT significantly improves 5-year overall survival at the expense of more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis.

Therapies in the pipeline for small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents ~15% of all cases of lung cancer and is characterized by a rapid tumour doubling time, early onset disease dissemination and high sensitivity to chemotherapy. SOURCES OF DATA: We searched MEDLINE and OVID databases for articles in English published from January 1980 to February 2015. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Platinum-based chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation are standard of care. Benefit from second-line chemotherapy is limited. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The role of platinum/irinotecan chemotherapy in the Western population and the role of maintenance therapies remain to be established. GROWING POINTS: Knowledge of the biology of SCLC has expanded exponentially and many potential therapeutic targets have been identified. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: The use of circulating tumour cells can help investigating molecular alterations occurring within tumour cells, understanding drug resistance mechanisms and evaluating new treatments.

Intrathoracic extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: assessment of the benefit of thoracic and brain radiotherapy using the SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ESCLC) includes metastatic disease and locally advanced disease confined to the thorax that cannot be encompassed in a typical radiation portal. We assessed and then compared the benefits of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or brain radiotherapy (BRT) on overall survival (OS) between the intrathoracic (T-ESCLC) and metastatic (M-ESCLC) groups using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. METHODS: TRT and BRT data were available for 10150 patients treated from 1988-1997. The T-ESCLC group included 1774 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and the proportional hazards model was used to estimate OS hazard ratios for prognostic factors including age, gender, race, tumor size, T/N stage, TRT, and BRT. RESULTS: The 2-year OS for T-ESCLC was 7.8 % compared to 3 % in the M-ESCLC group (p < 0.001). In the T-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 750 and 102 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 13 % in the TRT group compared to 4.1 % in the no-TRT group (p ≤ 0.001) and 22.5 % in the BRT group compared to 7 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). In the M-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 3093 and 1887 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 4.4 % in the TRT group compared to 2.8 % in the no-TRT group (p < 0.001) and 4.3 % in the BRT compared to 2.6 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). Age, gender, TRT and BRT were significant OS prognostic factors in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that T-ESCLC is a disease entity distinct from M-ESCLC. Prospective studies to determine whether TRT should be recommended for the thoracic-only subgroup are warranted.

Phase I trial of everolimus in combination with thoracic radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus in combination with thoracic radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced or oligometastatic untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Everolimus dose was escalated in incremental steps [sequential cohorts of three patients until the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)] and administered orally weekly (weekly group: dose of 10, 20 or 50 mg) or daily (daily group: 2.5, 5 or 10 mg), 1 week before, and during radiotherapy until 3.5 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. Two cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin-navelbine) were administrated 4.5 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in two centers, 56% had adenocarcinoma and 84% had stage III disease. In the weekly group (12 assessable patients), everolimus could be administered safely up to the maximum planned weekly dose of 50 mg; however, one patient experienced a DLT of interstitial pneumonitis at the weekly dose level of 20 mg. In the daily group (9 assessable patients): one DLT of interstitial pneumonitis with a fatal outcome was observed at the daily dose level of 2.5 mg; two other DLTs (one grade 3 esophagitis and one bilateral interstitial pneumonitis) were found at the daily dose level of 5 mg. Overall there were five patients with G3-4 interstitial pneumonitis related to treatment. Among 22 assessable patients for response, there were 9 (41%) partial response and 7 (32%) stable disease. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival actuarial rates were 31% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In previously untreated and unselected NSCLC patients, the recommended phase II dose of everolimus in combination with thoracic radiotherapy is 50 mg/week. Pulmonary toxicity is of concern and should be carefully monitored to establish the potential role of mTOR inhibitor with concomitant radiotherapy. EUDRACT N: 2007-001698-27.