Thrombolysis for Wake-Up Stroke Versus Non-Wake-Up Unwitnessed Stroke: EOS Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups. METHODS: Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A favorable outcome was prespecified as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. The IVT effect was compared between the treatment groups in the WUS and non-WUS with multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-four patients from 2 trials were analyzed; 542 had WUS (191 women, 272 receiving alteplase), and 92 had non-WUS (42 women, 43 receiving alteplase). Overall, no significant interaction was noted between the mode of onset and treatment effect (P value for interaction=0.796). In patients with WUS, the frequencies of favorable outcomes were 54.8% and 45.5% in the IVT and control groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]). Death occurred in 4.0% and 1.9%, respectively (P=0.162), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively (P=0.194). In patients with non-WUS, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes relative to the control (37.2% versus 29.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [0.58-5.37]). One death and one symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported in the IVT group, but none in the control. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effect of IVT between patients with WUS and non-WUS. IVT showed a significant benefit in patients with WUS, while there was insufficient statistical power to detect a substantial benefit in the non-WUS subgroup. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: CRD42020166903.

Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes with Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg in Clinical Practice: THAWS2 Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for patients with acute wake-up or unclear-onset strokes in clinical practice. METHODS: This multicenter observational study enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients with last-known-well time >4.5 h who had mismatch between DWI and FLAIR and were treated with IV alteplase. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after thrombolysis, all-cause deaths, and all adverse events. The efficacy outcomes were favorable outcome defined as an mRS score of 0-1 or recovery to the same mRS score as the premorbid score, complete independence defined as an mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days, and change in NIHSS at 24 h from baseline. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (35 females; mean age, 74 ± 11 years; premorbid complete independence, 54 [82%]; median NIHSS on admission, 11) were enrolled at 15 hospitals. Two patients (3%) had sICH. Median NIHSS changed from 11 (IQR, 6.75-16.25) at baseline to 5 (3-12.25) at 24 h after alteplase initiation (change, -4.8 ± 8.1). At discharge, 31 patients (47%) had favorable outcome and 29 (44%) had complete independence. None died within 90 days. Twenty-three (35%) also underwent mechanical thrombectomy (no sICH, NIHSS change of -8.5 ± 7.3), of whom 11 (48%) were completely independent at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world clinical practice, IV alteplase for unclear-onset stroke patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch provided safe and efficacious outcomes comparable to those in previous trials. Additional mechanical thrombectomy was performed safely in them.

Workflow and Outcome of Thrombectomy in Late Time Window: A Pooled Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of workflow times on the outcomes of patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late time window. METHODS: Individual patients' data who underwent EVT in the late time window (onset to imaging >6 hours) were pooled from seven registries and randomized clinical trials. Multiple time intervals were analyzed. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale 0-2). Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics and workflow time intervals. RESULTS: 608 patients were included. The median age was 70 years (IQR: 58-71), 307 (50.5%) were female, and 310 (53.2%) had wake-up strokes. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 493 (81.2%) patients, and 262 (44.9%) achieved 90-day mRS 0-2. The estimated odds of functional independence decreased by 13% for every 30 minute delay from emergency department (ED) arrival to imaging time and by 7% from ED arrival to the end of EVT in the entire cohort. Also, the estimated odds of functional independence decreased by 33% for every 30 minute delay in the interval from arterial puncture to end of EVT, 16% in the interval from arrival in ED to end of EVT and 6% in the interval from stroke onset to end of EVT among patients who had a wake-up stroke. CONCLUSION: Faster workflow from ED arrival to end of EVT is associated with improved functional independence among stroke patients treated in the late window.

Endovascular thrombectomy in wake-up stroke guided by arterial spin-labeling and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery versus diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch on MRI.

OBJECTIVE: This purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing the arterial spin-labeling (ASL) combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) combined with DWI double mismatch in the endovascular treatment of patients diagnosed with wake-up stroke (WUS). METHODS: In this single-center trial, patients diagnosed with WUS underwent thrombectomy if acute ischemic lesions were observed on DWI indicating large precerebral circulation occlusion. Patients with no significant parenchymal hypersignal on FLAIR and ASL imaging showing a hypoperfusion tissue to infarct core volume ratio of at least 1.2 were included. The participants were divided into groups receiving endovascular thrombectomy plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone, based on their subjective preference. Functional outcomes were assessed using the ordinal score on the modified Rankin scale (mRs) at 90 days, along with the rate of functional independence. RESULTS: In this study, a total of 77 patients were included, comprising 38 patients in the endovascular therapy group and 39 patients in the medical therapy group. The endovascular therapy group exhibited more favorable changes in the distribution of functional prognosis measured by mRs at 90 days, compared to the medical therapy group (adjusted common odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03 to 10.26; P < 0.01). Additionally, the endovascular therapy group had a higher proportion of patients achieving functional independence (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.36 to 11.81; P < 0.01). Importantly, there were no significant differences observed in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage or mortality rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Guided by the ASL-DWI and FLAIR-DWI double mismatch, endovascular thrombectomy combined with standard medical treatment appears to yield superior functional outcomes in patients with WUS and large vessel occlusion compared to standard medical treatment alone.

Sex differences in Wake-Up Stroke patients characteristics and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered. MATERIALS & METHODS: We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.

Development and external validation of a stability machine learning model to identify wake-up stroke onset time from MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and externally validate a machine learning (ML) model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) to identify the onset time of wake-up stroke from MRI. METHODS: DWI and FLAIR images of stroke patients within 24 h of clear symptom onset in our hospital (dataset 1, n = 410) and another hospital (dataset 2, n = 177) were included. Seven ML models based on dataset 1 were developed to estimate the stroke onset time for binary classification (≤ 4.5 h or > 4.5 h): Random Forest (RF), support vector machine with kernel (svmLinear) or radial basis function kernel (svmRadial), Bayesian (Bayes), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and neural network (NNET). ROC analysis and RSD were performed to evaluate the performance and stability of the ML models, respectively, and dataset 2 was externally validated to evaluate the model generalization ability using ROC analysis. RESULTS: svmRadial achieved the best performance with the highest AUC and accuracy (AUC: 0.896, accuracy: 0.878), and was the most stable (RSD% of AUC: 0.08, RSD% of accuracy: 0.06). The svmRadial model was then selected as the final model, and the AUC of the svmRadial model for predicting the onset time external validation was 0.895, with 0.825 accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The svmRadial model using DWI + FLAIR is the most stable and generalizable for identifying the onset time of wake-up stroke patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset. KEY POINTS: • Machining learning model helps clinicians to identify wake-up stroke patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset. • A prospective study showed that svmRadial model based on DWI + FLAIR was the most stable in predicting the stroke onset time. • External validation showed that svmRadial model has good generalization ability in predicting the stroke onset time.

Surrogate biomarkers of outcome for wake-up ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Wake-up ischemic stroke (IS) has been usually excluded from acute stroke therapy options for being outside of the safe treatment window. We identified risk factors, and clinical or molecular biomarkers that could be therapeutic targets for wake-up stroke prevention, thus hopefully leading to a decrease in its mortality and disability in medium to long-term outcome. METHODS: 4251 ischemic stroke (IS) patients from a prospectively registered database were recruited; 3838 (90.3%) had known onset-symptom time, and 413 (9.7%) were wake-up strokes. The main endpoint was to analyze the association between different serum biomarkers with wake-up IS episodes and their progression. Leukocytes count, serum levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and vitamin D were analyzed as inflammation biomarkers; N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic-Peptide and microalbuminuria, used as atrial/endothelial dysfunction biomarkers; finally, glutamate levels as excitotoxicity biomarker. In addition, demographic, clinical and neuroimaging variables associated with the time-evolution of wake-up IS patients and functional outcome at 3 months were evaluated. Good and poor functional outcome were defined as mRS ≤2 and mRS > 2 at 3 months, respectively. RESULTS: Wake-up IS showed a poorer outcome at 3-months than in patients with known on-set-symptom time (59.1% vs. 48.1%; p < 0.0001). Patients with wake-up IS had higher levels of inflammation biomarkers; IL-6 levels at admission (51.5 ± 15.1 vs. 27.8 ± 18.6 pg/ml; p < 0.0001), and low vitamin D levels at 24 h (5.6 ± 5.8 vs. 19.2 ± 9.4 ng/ml; p < 0.0001) are worthy of attention. In a logistic regression model adjusted for vitamin D, OR was 15.1; CI 95%: 8.6-26.3, p < 0.0001. However, we found no difference in vitamin D levels between patients with or without clinical-DWI mismatch (no: 18.95 ± 9.66; yes: 17.84 ± 11.77 ng/mL, p = 0.394). No difference in DWI volume at admission was found (49.3 ± 96.9 ml in wake-up IS patients vs. 51.7 ± 98.2 ml in awake IS patients; p = 0.895). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory biomarkers are the main factors that are strongly associated with wake-up IS episodes. Wake-up IS is associated with lower vitamin D levels. These data indicate that vitamin D deficiency could become a therapeutic target to reduce wake-up IS events.

Investigating the Association between Wake-Up Stroke and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Management of wake-up stroke (WUS) is always a challenge as no clear time of onset could be ascertained, and how to choose an appropriate therapy remains unclear. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been regarded as a potential risk factor to WUS, yet no consensus was achieved. Motivated by the need for a deeper understanding of WUS and its association with sleep apnea, meta-analyses summarizing the available evidence of respiratory events and indices were conducted, and sensitivity analysis was also used for heterogeneity. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched, and cross-checking was done for relevant studies. Collected data included demographic characteristics, and sleep apnea parameters were extracted with stroke patients divided into WUS and NWUS groups. Clinical data of stroke patients accompanied with sleep apnea syndrome (OSA, SAS, and severe SAS) were also extracted for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that OSA, SAS, and severe SAS were significantly higher in WUS patients. A significantly higher AHI (WMD 7.74, 95% CI: 1.38-14.11; p = 0.017) and ODI (WMD of 3.85, 95% CI: 0.261-7.438; p = 0.035) than NWUS patients was also observed in the analysis of respiratory indices. CONCLUSION: WUS patients have severer SDB problems compared to NWUS patients suggesting that respiratory events during sleep might be underlying the induction of WUS. Besides, the induction of WUS was significantly associated with men rather than women. Therefore, early diagnosis and management of potential WUS patients should benefit from the detection of SDB status and respiratory effects.

Supine blood pressure normalised by daytime series values is independently associated with ischaemic wake-up stroke.

PURPOSE: Wake-up stroke constitutes up to 1/4 of all ischaemic strokes; however, its pathomechanisms remain largely unknown. Although low nocturnal blood flow may be the underlying cause, little is known about blood pressure (BP) characteristic of wake-up stroke patients. The aim of our study was to look for differences in BP variables between wake-up stroke and known-onset stroke patients and to seek BP indices which could distinguish wake-up stroke patients from other stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the study, we included ischaemic stroke patients in whom office BP measurement and Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were recorded at day 7, after acute hypertensive response. The daytime period was defined as the interval from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. From ABPM, we obtained parameters of BP variability. Additionally, we calculated the BP percentage differences defined as (supine office BP-average daytime BP)/average daytime BP for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure. We calculated analogous indices for night-time. The univariate and multivariate relationships between BP variables and wake-up stroke were analysed. RESULTS: Among the recruited 120 patients (aged 61.6 ± 12.3; 88 [73%] males; the baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale score 4 [3-8]), 36 (30%) had wake-up stroke. In a univariate analysis, the systolic and mean daytime and night-time BP differences were significantly lower in patients with wake-up stroke [(-1.92 (-11.55 to 3.95) vs 4.12 (-2.48 to 11.31), p = 0.006 and -6.20 (-12.32 to 7.42) vs 2.00 (-6.86 to 11.65), p = 0.029 for daytime, respectively; 0.00 (-9.79 to 11.82) vs 9.84 (0.00 to 18.25), p = 0.003 and 0.51 (-8.49 to 12.08) vs 7.82 (-2.47 to 20.39), p = 0.026, for night-time, respectively]. After adjustment for possible confounders, the systolic BP difference remained significantly associated with wake-up stroke (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-1.00, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The subacute office-ambulatory BP difference including the dynamic (systolic BP), but not static BP component was independently associated with wake-up stroke.

Serious Adverse Events and Their Impact on Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the WAKE-UP Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the first days and weeks after an acute ischemic stroke, patients are prone to complications that can influence further treatment, recovery, and functional outcome. In clinical trials, severe complications are recorded as serious adverse events (SAE). We analyzed the effect of SAE on functional outcome and predictors of SAE in the randomized controlled WAKE-UP trial (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke). METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of WAKE-UP, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of magnetic resonance imaging-guided intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke and unknown time of onset. Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale 90 days after the stroke. SAE were reported to a central safety desk and recorded and categorized by organ system using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. We used logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of SAE on functional outcome and linear multiple regression analysis to identify baseline predictors of SAE. RESULTS: Among 503 patients randomized, 199 SAE were reported for n=110 (22%) patients. Of those patients who did suffer a SAE, 20 (10%) had a fatal outcome. Patients suffering from at least one SAE had a lower odds of reaching a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.21-0.61], P<0.001). Higher age (P=0.04) and male sex (P=0.01) were predictors for the occurrence of SAE. CONCLUSIONS: SAEs were observed in about one in 5 patients, were more frequent in elderly and male patients and were associated with worse functional outcome. These results may help to assess the risk of SAE in future stroke trials and create awareness for severe complications after stroke in clinical practice. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01525290. URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 2011-005906-32.

Thrombolytic therapy for wake-up stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: According to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, patients presenting with disabling stroke symptoms should be treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) within 4.5 h of time last known well. However, 25% of strokes are detected upon awakening (i.e., wake-up stroke [WUS]), which renders patients ineligible for IV tPA administered via time-based treatment algorithms, because it is impossible to establish a reliable time of symptom onset. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of IV tPA compared with normal saline, placebo, or no treatment in patients with WUS using imaging-based treatment algorithms. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus between January 1, 2006 and April 30, 2020. We included controlled trials (randomized or nonrandomized), observational cohort studies (prospective or retrospective), and single-arm studies in which adults with WUS were administered IV tPA after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- or computed tomography (CT)-based imaging. Our primary outcome was recovery at 90 days (defined as a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2), and our secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h, mortality, and other adverse effects. RESULTS: We included 16 studies that enrolled a total of 14,017 patients. Most studies were conducted in Europe (37.5%) or North America (37.5%), and 1757 patients (12.5%) received IV tPA. All studies used MRI-based (five studies) or CT-based (10 studies) imaging selection, and one study used a combination of modalities. Sixty-one percent of patients receiving IV tPA achieved an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51%-70%, 12 studies), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 1.01-1.46, four studies). Three percent of patients receiving IV tPA experienced sICH within 36 h (95% CI: 2.5%-4.1%; 16 studies), which is an RR of 4.00 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 2.85-5.61, seven studies). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that IV tPA is associated with a better functional outcome at 90 days despite the increased but acceptable risk of sICH. Based on these results, IV tPA should be offered as a treatment for WUS patients with favorable neuroimaging findings.

Implementation of emergent MRI for wake-up stroke: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Recent updates in national guidelines for management of acute ischemic stroke in patients of unknown time of symptom onset ("wake-up" strokes) incorporate, for the first time, use of emergent MRI. In this retrospective case series, we analyze our experience at a Comprehensive Stroke Center implementing a new workflow including MRI in this clinical setting. This study also describes "DWI-FLAIR" mismatch, a critical concept for the interpretation of emergent brain MRIs performed for wake-up strokes. METHODS: Over a 14-month period, all brain MRIs for wake-up stroke were identified. The imaging was analyzed by two board-certified, fellowship-trained neuroradiologists, and a diagnosis of DWI-FLAIR mismatch was made by consensus. Process metrics assessed included interval between last known well time and brain imaging, interval between CT and MRI, and interval between brain MRI and interpretation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with a history of "wake-up stroke" were identified. Thirteen of the 16 patients (81.3%) were found to have a DWI-FLAIR mismatch, suggesting infarct < 4.5 h old. The mean time between last known well and MRI was 7.89 h with mean interval between CT and MRI of 1.83 h. Forty-six percent of patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch received intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: In this "real world" assessment of incorporation of emergent MRI for wake-up strokes, there were several key factors to successful implementation of this new workflow, including effective and accurate description of MRI findings; close collaboration amongst stakeholders; 24/7 availability of MRI; and 24/7 onsite coverage by neurology and radiology physicians.

Unknown Onset Stroke: Differences Between Patients with Wake-Up Stroke and Daytime-Unwitnessed Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with unknown onset stroke (UOS) can be categorized as wake-up stroke (WUS) and daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS). We sought to determine whether decisions for initial imaging modalities, frequency of mismatch findings, resulting treatment decisions and outcome differ between WUS and DUS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all patients with UOS admitted to our Stroke Unit from January to December 2018 were evaluated and classified as either WUS or DUS. RESULTS: 180 patients were included (74.4 % WUS, 25.6 % DUS). Compared to WUS patients, DUS patients received more often a non-contrast computed tomography initially (43.5 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.016). MR imaging was performed more frequently in WUS patients (53.7 % vs. 34.8 %, p = 0.027). The rate of mismatch findings in patients examined with either multimodal CT or MRI (126 patients, 101 WUS and 26 DUS) did not differ between the groups. Likewise, the rate of intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy was similar in both groups. DUS patients had more often severe neurological deficits at admission as defined by the National Institutes of Stroke Scale score (14.2 vs. 8.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DUS had disadvantages in mismatch-based treatment options due to initial imaging modalities. Current data do not support different treatment concepts in WUS and DUS patients. All UOS patients should initially be evaluated by either multimodal CT or MRI to open a chance to receive reperfusion therapy.

Adapting Clinical Practice of Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 4.5 Hours: A Review of the Literature.

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that advanced neuroimaging can select patients for recanalization therapy in an extended time window. The favorable functional outcomes and safety profile of these studies have led to the incorporation of neuroimaging in endovascular treatment guidelines, and most recently, also extended to decision making on thrombolysis. Two randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that patients who are not amenable to endovascular thrombectomy within 4.5 hours from symptoms discovery or beyond 4.5 hours from the last-known-well time may also be safely treated with intravenous thrombolysis and have a clinical benefit above the risk of safety concerns. With the growing aging population, increased stroke incidence in the young, and the impact of evolving medical practice, healthcare and stroke systems of care need to adapt continuously to provide evidence-based care efficiently. Therefore, understanding and incorporating appropriate screening strategies is critical for the prompt recognition of potentially eligible patients for extended-window intravenous thrombolysis. Here we review the clinical trial evidence for thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window and provide a review of new enrolling clinical trials that include thrombolysis intervention beyond the 4.5 hour window.

Disabling Wake Up Stroke without Lesions on Initial Diffusion Weighted Imaging - Case Report and Clinical Implications.

An 86-year-old lady presented after waking up with left sided paresis and neglect. Right hemispheral stroke was suspected, but initial MRI with Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) was negative and there was no large vessel occlusion. We accordingly withheld intravenous thrombolysis. She did not improve clinically and follow-up MRI after three days showed a marked lesion compatible with acute ischemic stroke in the right middle cerebral artery territory. This case shows that even with a disabling stroke in the anterior circulation initial DWI may be negative. Former studies established that thrombolysis can be safe in these cases when there is no doubt about the clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke.

Addressing a real-life problem: treatment with intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with an extended time window beyond 4.5 h based on computed tomography perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute ischemic stroke treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is restricted to a time window of 4.5 h after known or presumed onset. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging-guided treatment decision-making in wake-up stroke (WUS) was shown to be effective. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and outcome of IVT in patients with a time window beyond 4.5 h selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive patients last seen well beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset treated with IVT based on CTP between January 2015 and October 2018. CTP was visually assessed to estimate the mismatch between cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume maps. Early infarct signs were documented according to Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Safety data were obtained for mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Follow-up was assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age ± SD 77.6 ± 11.5 years, 50.0% female). Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 8.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-14]. The most frequent reasons for an extended time window were WUS (60.0%) and delayed hospital admission (27.1%). Median time from last seen well to IVT was 11.4 h. Median ASPECTS was 10 (IQR, 9-10) and CTP mismatch 90% (IQR, 80%-100%). A total of 24 patients (34.3%) underwent additional mechanical thrombectomy. sICH occurred in four patients (5.7%). At follow-up, 49.3% had an mRS score of 0-2 and 22.4% had an mRS score of 0-1. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting in an extended time window beyond 4.5 h, IVT treatment with decision-making based on CTP might be a safe procedure. Further evaluation in clinical trials is needed.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Guided by Perfusion CT with Alteplase in >4.5 Hours from Stroke Onset.

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake-up stroke (WUS), stroke of unknown time of onset (SUKO), or when time exceeds 4.5 h from last-seen-normal (LSN) guided by CT perfusion (CTP) or MRI has been recently suggested. However, there is limited information of IVT in those patients in real-world studies. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate safety and efficacy of IVT selected by CTP in patients with WUS, SUKO, or stroke of time onset beyond 4.5 h. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a prospective cohort of patients who underwent IVT from January 2010 to December 2017. Two groups were defined: standard of care group (SC) included patients with time onset <4.5 h and CTP group included patients with WUS, SUKO, or onset beyond >4.5 h from LSN with penumbra area in CTP. We evaluated baseline characteristics, functional outcomes according to modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and at 90 days, and intracranial hemorrhages rates. RESULTS: 657 patients were studied: 604 (92%) were treated in the SC group and 53 (8%) in the CTP group. The mean NIHSS score was 9.8 in the CTP group versus 13 in the SC group (p = 0.001). Seventeen patients in the CTP group (32.1%) received bridging therapy with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Last time seen well-to-needle time was 538 versus 155 min (p < 0.001). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was equal in both groups (3.8 vs. 3.8%, p = 1). Good functional outcome (mRS < 2) was achieved in both groups (72 vs. 60.4%, p = 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: IVT in patients with WUS, SUKO, or stroke beyond >4.5 h from LSN, with salvageable brain tissue on CTP, seems to be safe and has similar functional outcomes at 90 days to the standard therapeutic window, even when combined with MT.

Clinical outcomes and safety profile of Tenecteplase in wake-up stroke.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase has probably pharmacological and clinical advantages in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. There are lacking data about safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in wake-up stroke (WUPS). AIMS: To investigate safety and efficacy of tenecteplase compared to alteplase in WUPS patients included in NOR-TEST. METHODS: WUPS patients in NOR-TEST were included in the study based on DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Included patients randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg (to a maximum of 40 mg) or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (to a maximum of 90 mg). Neurological improvement was defined as 1) favorable functional outcome at 90 days modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0 or 1 and 2) neurological improvement measured with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 4 points within 24 hours as compared to admission NIHSS or NIHSS 0 at 24 hours. RESULTS: Of 1100 patients from 13 stroke centers included in NOR-TEST, 45 were WUPS patients. Of these, 5 patients were stroke mimics and excluded. Of the remaining 40 patients (3.6%), 24 were treated with alteplase (60%). There was no difference in the number of patients achieving a good clinical outcome (mRS 0-1) in either treatment group. Patients treated with tenecteplase showed a better early neurological improvement (87.5% vs 54.2%, P = 0.027). No ICH was detected on MRI/CT 24-28 hours after thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: In WUPS patients treated in NOR-TEST, there was no difference in clinical outcomes at 90 days and no ICH events or deaths were observed in either alteplase- or tenecteplase-treated patients. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01949948.

Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke beyond the time window: A meta-analysis.

Currently, endovascular treatment has been proven to be effective when conducted within 6 hours of symptom onset. However, when patients have symptoms for more than 6 hours, have a daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS) or wake up with a stroke (wake-up stroke, WUS), the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment need to be further elucidated. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with ischemic stroke beyond the time window with that ≤6 hours. PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from inception to November 2018. The following outcomes were evaluated by a random-effects model: efficacy outcomes, that is, functional independence and successful recanalization, and safety outcomes, that is, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. Subgroup analyses were also performed to examine whether patient or study characteristics were associated with the outcomes. Nine observational studies, including 5192 patients (1414 patients with extended time windows [ETWs]; 3778 patients ≤6 hours), were eligible for analysis. The overall analysis demonstrated that the functional independence was worse in patients with ETWs vs those ≤6 hours (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90, P = .0006). However, subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in functional independence between the two groups when patients were selected for a perfusion mismatch by imaging (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43, P = 1.000). Therefore, compared with a window ≤6 hours, endovascular treatment with ETWs for ischemic stroke may not result in poor outcomes when patients are typically selected by perfusion techniques.

Pathophysiologic mechanisms, neuroimaging and treatment in wake-up stroke.

Wake-up stroke (WUS) or ischemic stroke occurring during sleep accounts for 14%-29.6% of all ischemic strokes. Management of WUS is complicated by its narrow therapeutic time window and attributable risk factors, which can affect the safety and efficacy of administering intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). This manuscript will review risk factors of WUS, with a focus on obstructive sleep apnea, potential mechanisms of WUS, and evaluate studies assessing safety and efficacy of IV t-PA treatment in WUS patients guided by neuroimaging to estimate time of symptom onset. The authors used PubMed (1966 to March 2018) to search for the term "Wake-Up Stroke" cross-referenced with "pathophysiology," ''pathogenesis," "pathology," "magnetic resonance imaging," "obstructive sleep apnea," or "treatment." English language Papers were reviewed. Also reviewed were pertinent papers from the reference list of the above-matched manuscripts. Studies that focused only on acute Strokes with known-onset of symptoms were not reviewed. Literature showed several potential risk factors associated with increased risk of WUS. Although the onset of WUS is unknown, a few studies investigated the potential benefit of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in estimating the age of onset which encouraged conducting clinical trials assessing the efficacy of MRI-guided thrombolytic therapy in WUS.