RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Boarding admitted patients in emergency departments (EDs) is a national crisis that is worsening despite potential financial disadvantages. The objective of this study was to assess costs associated with boarding. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational investigation of patients admitted through an ED for management of acute stroke at a large, urban, academic, comprehensive stroke center hospital. We employed time-driven activity-based costing methodology to estimate cost for patient care activities during admission and aggregated results to estimate the total cost of boarding versus inpatient care. Primary outcomes were total daily costs per patient for medical-surgical (med/surg) boarding, med/surg inpatient care, ICU boarding, and ICU inpatient care. RESULTS: The total daily cost per patient with acute stroke was US$1856, for med/surg boarding versus US$993 for med/surg inpatient care and US$2267, for ICU boarding versus US$2165, for ICU inpatient care. These differences were even greater when accounting for costs associated with traveler nurses. ED nurses spent 293 min/d (mean) caring for each med/surg boarder; inpatient nurses spent 313 min/d for each med/surg inpatient. ED nurses spent 419 min/d caring for each ICU boarder; inpatient nurses spent 787 min/d for each ICU inpatient. Neurology attendings and residents spent 25 and 52 min/d caring for each med/surg boarder versus 62 minutes and 90 minutes for each med/surg inpatient, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using advanced cost-accounting methods, our investigation provides novel evidence that boarding of admitted patients is financially costly, adding greater urgency for elimination of this practice.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Admisión del Paciente , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-cost medical consumables (HMCs) have emerged as significant economic and technological challenges for numerous national healthcare systems. Governmental hospitals play an indispensable role in many national health systems, closely linked to the evaluation of admissions and the management of procurement for HMCs. Nevertheless, many governmental hospitals face avoidable management risks due to the lack of a decision-making tool. In response, we conducted a systematic review to establishing a framework for the admission criteria of HMCs. This framework aims to enhance their effective utilization and maximize economic, clinical, and social benefits. METHODS: In accordance with a systematic review protocol developed for our study, we conducted comprehensive searches in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases to identify all correlation studies conducted prior to December 31, 2021. Subsequently, two independent reviewers performed a two-round screening process, resulting in the inclusion of 23 articles in our study. Finally, a third reviewer meticulously examined the selected indicators and contributed to the development of the final criterion framework. RESULTS: The criterion framework was established with 7 first-level indicators and 23 s-level indicators. Among the first-level indicators, "Clinical Benefit" held the highest significance, with a combined weight of 1.606, followed by "Economic Value" and "Organizational Impact" at 1.497 and 1.159, respectively. At the second level, "Safety" and "Efficacy" carried equal weight in the decision-making tool, with combined weights of approximately 1.300 each and a standard combined weight of 0.130. CONCLUSION: This admission criteria framework serves as a vital decision-making tool for managing admissions and highlights several crucial evaluation indicators. Economic considerations emerge as the principal determinant in HMCs procurement decisions. Consequently, healthcare managers and decision-makers are recommended to give precedence to value-based healthcare and evidence-based procurement practices. In the long term, governmental hospitals must grapple with the challenge of judiciously allocating limited resources to maximize both social and economic benefits.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/economíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Boarding, the period in which a patient spends in the emergency department (ED) before admission, may be hazardous to critically ill patients, particularly the elderly. This study investigated the associations of boarding with hospital course, prognosis, and medical expenditure in older patients. METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2021, the medical records of older patients (age ≥ 65) visiting the ED of a tertiary referral hospital who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups according to boarding time with a cutoff set at 6 h. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay, and total/average hospitalization cost. Subgroup analyses considered age and disease type. RESULTS: Among 1318 ICU admissions from the ED, 36% were subjected to boarding for over 6 h. Prolonged boarding had a longer ICU (8.9 ± 8.8 vs. 11.2 ± 12.2 days, P < .001) and hospital (17.8 ± 20.1 vs. 22.8 ± 23.0 days, P < .001) stay, higher treatment cost (10.4 ± 13.9 vs. 13.2 ± 16.5 thousands of USD, P = .001), and hospital mortality (19% vs. 25% P = .020). Multivariate regression analysis showed a longer ICU stay in patients aged 65-79 (8.3 ± 8.4 vs. 11.8 ± 14.2 days, P < .001) and cardiology patients (6.9 ± 8.4 vs. 8.8 ± 9.7 days, P = .001). Besides, the treatment cost was also higher for both groups (10.4 ± 14.6 vs. 13.7 ± 17.7 thousands of USD, P = .004 and 8.4 ± 14.0 vs. 11.7 ± 16.6 thousands of USD, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Extended ED boarding for critically ill medical patients over 65 years old was associated with negative outcomes, including longer ICU/hospital stays, higher treatment costs, and hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a common cause of mortality in the United States. However, the economic burden of stroke on the healthcare system is not well known. In this study, we aim to calculate the annual cumulative and per-patient cost of stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). We calculate annual trends in cost for stroke patients from 2006 to 2019. A multivariate linear regression with patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index) as covariates was used to identify factors for higher costs. RESULTS: In this study time-period, 2,998,237 stroke patients presented to the ED and 2,481,171 (83 %) were admitted. From 2006 to 2019, the cumulative ED cost increased by a factor of 7.0 from 0.49 ± 0.03 to 3.91 ± 0.16 billion dollars (p < 0.001). The cumulative inpatient (IP) cost increased by a factor of 2.7 from 14.42 ± 0.78 to 37.06 ± 2.26 billion dollars (p < 0.001. Per-patient ED charges increased by a factor of 3.0 from 1950 ± 64 to 7818 ± 260 dollars (p < 0.001). Per-patient IP charges increased by 89 % from 40.22 +/- 1.12 to 76.06 ± 3.18 thousand dollars (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Strokes place an increasing financial burden on the US healthcare system. Certain patient demographics including age, male gender, more comorbidities, and insurance type were significantly associated with increased cost of care.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Precios de Hospital/tendencias , Comorbilidad , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delivering hospital-level care with comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the home is one approach to deal with the increased demand for bed-based hospital care, but clinical effectiveness is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of admission avoidance hospital at home (HAH) with CGA for older persons. DESIGN: Multisite randomized trial. (ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN60477865). SETTING: 9 hospital and community sites in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS: 1055 older persons who were medically unwell, were physiologically stable, and were referred for a hospital admission. INTERVENTION: Admission avoidance HAH with CGA versus hospital admission with CGA when available using 2:1 randomization. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of living at home was measured at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were new admission to long-term residential care, death, health status, delirium, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 83.3 years (SD, 7.0). At 6-month follow-up, 528 of 672 (78.6%) participants in the CGA HAH group versus 247 of 328 (75.3%) participants in the hospital group were living at home (relative risk [RR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.15]; P = 0.36); 114 of 673 (16.9%) versus 58 of 328 (17.7%) had died (RR, 0.98 [CI, 0.65 to 1.47]; P = 0.92); and 37 of 646 (5.7%) versus 27 of 311 (8.7%) were in long-term residential care (RR, 0.58 [CI, 0.45 to 0.76]; P < 0.001). LIMITATION: The findings are most applicable to older persons referred from a hospital short-stay acute medical assessment unit; episodes of delirium may have been undetected. CONCLUSION: Admission avoidance HAH with CGA led to similar outcomes as hospital admission in the proportion of older persons living at home as well as a decrease in admissions to long-term residential care at 6 months. This type of service can provide an alternative to hospitalization for selected older persons. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (12/209/66).
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Control de Costos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Instituciones Residenciales/economía , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidities have the greatest healthcare needs and generate the highest expenditure in the health system. There is an increasing focus on identifying specific disease combinations for addressing poor outcomes. Existing research has identified a small number of prevalent "clusters" in the general population, but the limited number examined might oversimplify the problem and these may not be the ones associated with important outcomes. Combinations with the highest (potentially preventable) secondary care costs may reveal priority targets for intervention or prevention. We aimed to examine the potential of defining multimorbidity clusters for impacting secondary care costs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used national, Hospital Episode Statistics, data from all hospital admissions in England from 2017/2018 (cohort of over 8 million patients) and defined multimorbidity based on ICD-10 codes for 28 chronic conditions (we backfilled conditions from 2009/2010 to address potential undercoding). We identified the combinations of multimorbidity which contributed to the highest total current and previous 5-year costs of secondary care and costs of potentially preventable emergency hospital admissions in aggregate and per patient. We examined the distribution of costs across unique disease combinations to test the potential of the cluster approach for targeting interventions at high costs. We then estimated the overlap between the unique combinations to test potential of the cluster approach for targeting prevention of accumulated disease. We examined variability in the ranks and distributions across age (over/under 65) and deprivation (area level, deciles) subgroups and sensitivity to considering a smaller number of diseases. There were 8,440,133 unique patients in our sample, over 4 million (53.1%) were female, and over 3 million (37.7%) were aged over 65 years. No clear "high cost" combinations of multimorbidity emerged as possible targets for intervention. Over 2 million (31.6%) patients had 63,124 unique combinations of multimorbidity, each contributing a small fraction (maximum 3.2%) to current-year or 5-year secondary care costs. Highest total cost combinations tended to have fewer conditions (dyads/triads, most including hypertension) affecting a relatively large population. This contrasted with the combinations that generated the highest cost for individual patients, which were complex sets of many (6+) conditions affecting fewer persons. However, all combinations containing chronic kidney disease and hypertension, or diabetes and hypertension, made up a significant proportion of total secondary care costs, and all combinations containing chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension had the highest proportion of preventable emergency admission costs, which might offer priority targets for prevention of disease accumulation. The results varied little between age and deprivation subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Key limitations include availability of data only from hospitals and reliance on hospital coding of health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that there are no clear multimorbidity combinations for a cluster-targeted intervention approach to reduce secondary care costs. The role of risk-stratification and focus on individual high-cost patients with interventions is particularly questionable for this aim. However, if aetiology is favourable for preventing further disease, the cluster approach might be useful for targeting disease prevention efforts with potential for cost-savings in secondary care.
Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Multimorbilidad/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal health care utilization of Medicaid-insured children with a history of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) compared with similar children without NAS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Data were extracted from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract files for all available states and DC from 2003-2013. Subjects were followed up to 11 years. In total, 17 229 children with NAS were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 779.5. Children without NAS, matched on demographic and health variables, served as the comparison group. Outcomes were number of claims for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department encounters, numbers of prescription claims, and costs associated with these services. Linked claims were identified for each subject using a unique, within-state ID. RESULTS: Children with NAS had increased claims for inpatient admissions (marginal effect [ME] 0.49; SE 0.01) and emergency department visits (ME 0.30; SE 0.04) through year 1; increased prescriptions (ME 1.45; SE 0.08, age 0) (ME 0.69; SE 0.11, age 1 year) through year 2; and increased outpatient encounters (ME 20.13; SE 0.54, age 0) (ME 3.95; SE 0.62, age 1 year) (ME 2.90; SE 1.11, age 2 years) through year 3 after adjusting for potential confounders (P < .01 for all). Beyond the third year, health care utilization was similar between those with and without NAS. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a diagnosis of NAS have greater health care utilization through the third year of life. These differences resolve by the fourth year. Our results suggest resolution of disparities may be due to shifts in developmental health management in school-age children and inability to track relevant diagnoses in a health care database.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid/economía , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/economía , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a pediatric headache infusion center (HIC) in alleviating the symptoms and preventing future visits to the emergency department (ED). BACKGROUND: Headache is a common reason for visits to the pediatric ED. ED visits are associated with inordinate costs of care and are conceived by parents to be avoidable if adequate alternatives are available. An infusion center for acute treatment of intractable headache in children with chronic migraine may be an effective alternative to an ED visit. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a single-center cohort of patients with a known history of chronic migraine, presenting to Dayton Children's HIC with an acute migraine from June 1, 2017 to June 1, 2020. Patients were treated according to established protocols divided into two pathways. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, pre- and postinfusion pain scores, ED visits and inpatient admissions within 2 weeks of HIC visit, and ED visits 1 year prior and 1 year after the HIC visit were noted. RESULTS: A total of 297 HIC visits were analyzed from 201 patients. The HIC was effective in controlling symptoms with a significant reduction in pain score (median [interquartile range; IQR] 7.0 [2.0] preinfusion vs. 1.0 [2.0] postinfusion, p < 0.001). Only 25/297 (8.4%) patients came to the ED within 2 weeks of the HIC visit, and an even smaller number of patients (20/297, 6.7%) were admitted as inpatients within 2 weeks of the HIC visit. The number of ED visits was significantly reduced in the year after the HIC visit compared with the year prior (median [IQR] 1.0 [2.0] before vs. 0.0 [1.0] after, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A pediatric HIC is effective in alleviating the symptoms and preventing ED visits. These centers should be considered as standard of care at children's hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Dimensión del Dolor , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the context of the rising rate of diabetes in pregnancy in Australia, this study aims to examine the health service and resource use associated with diabetes during pregnancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This project utilised a linked administrative dataset containing health and cost data for all mothers who gave birth in Queensland, Australia between 2012 and 2015 (n = 186,789, plus their babies, n = 189,909). The association between maternal characteristics and diabetes status were compared with chi-square analyses. Multiple logistic regression produced the odds ratio of having different outcomes for women who had diabetes compared to women who did not. A two-sample t-test compared the mean number of health services accessed. Generalised linear regression produced the mean costs associated with health service use. Mothers who had diabetes during pregnancy were more likely to have their labour induced at <38 weeks gestation (OR:1.39, 95% CI:1.29-1.50); have a cesarean section (OR: 1.26, 95% CI:1.22-1.31); have a preterm birth (OR:1.24, 95%: 1.18-1.32); have their baby admitted to a Special Care Nursery (OR: 2.34, 95% CI:2.26-2.43) and a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (OR:1.25, 95%CI: 1.14-1.37). On average, mothers with diabetes access health services on more occasions during pregnancy (54.4) compared to mothers without (50.5). Total government expenditure on mothers with diabetes over the first 1000 days of the perinatal journey was significantly higher than in mothers without diabetes ($12,757 and $11,332). CONCLUSION: Overall, mothers that have diabetes in pregnancy require greater health care and resource use than mothers without diabetes in pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/economía , Diabetes Gestacional/economía , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Embarazo en Diabéticas/economía , Embarazo en Diabéticas/terapia , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/economía , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/economía , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Embarazo , Embarazo en Diabéticas/epidemiología , Queensland , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is evident that comorbidity exacerbate the complexity of the management of lung cancer, however, limited research has been conducted to investigate the impact of comorbidity on health service utilization and cost, as well as the treatment choice among lung cancer patients. We examined the association of comorbidity with medical service utilization, cost and treatment choice among lung cancer patients in China. METHODS: We used claims data from China Urban Employees' Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) and Urban Residents' Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) between 2013 to 2016 and data from Hospital Information System (HIS) Database in Beijing Cancer Hospital (BCH). Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was used to assess comorbidity. Negative binomial regression, generalized linear model (GLM) with a gamma distribution and a log link, and logistic regression was applied to assess the associations between comorbidity and medical service utilization, cost and treatment choice, respectively. RESULTS: Among 8655 patients with lung cancer, 31.3% of had at least one comorbid conditions. Having comorbidity was associated with increased number of annual outpatient visits (1.6, 95%CI: 1.3, 1.9) and inpatients admissions (0.8, 95%CI, 0.70, 0.90), increased outpatient (USD635.5, 95%CI: 490.3, 780.8) and inpatient expenditure (USD2 470.3, 95CI%: 1998.6, 2941.9), as well as increased possibility of choosing radio therapy (OR: 1.208, 95%CI:1.012-1.441) and chemotherapy (1.363, 1.196-1.554), and decreased possibility of choosing surgery (0.850, 0.730-0.989). The medical utilization and expenditure, the possibility of choosing radiotherapy increases, and the possibility of choosing surgery decreases with the increasing number of chronic conditions. There are variations in the association with medical service utilization and expenditure, and treatment choice among individuals with different types of comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: Comorbidity among lung cancer patients restricts the potential treatment choices and poses an extra substantial health care burden. Our findings provide implications for both the clinical management and health service planning and financing for lung cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Comorbilidad , Quimioterapia/economía , Quimioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia/economía , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) have a wide range of effectiveness. The estimated effectiveness of non-intravenous benzodiazepines (non-IV BZDs) ranges from approximately 70% to 90% and the estimated effectiveness of non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medications (non-BZD ASMs) ranges from approximately 50% to 80%. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of SE. METHODS: We performed a decision analysis that evaluates how decisional uncertainty on treatment choices for SE impacts hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and costs in the United States. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the available literature. RESULTS: Use of a non-IV BZD with high estimated effectiveness, like intranasal midazolam, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like rectal diazepam, would result in a median (p25 -p75 ) reduction in hospital admissions from 6 (3.9-8.8) to 1.1 (0.7-1.8) per 100 cases and associated cost reductions of $638 ($289-$1064) per pediatric patient and $1107 ($972-$1281) per adult patient. For BZD-resistant SE, use of a non-BZD ASM with high estimated effectiveness, like phenobarbital, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like phenytoin/fosphenytoin, would result in a reduction in ICU admissions from 9.1 (7.3-11.2) to 3.9 (2.6-5.5) per 100 cases and associated cost reduction of $1261 ($445-$2223) per pediatric patient and $319 ($-93-$806) per adult patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that relatively minor improvements in effectiveness may lead to substantial reductions in downstream hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs. SIGNIFICANCE: Decreasing decisional uncertainty and using the most effective treatments for SE may substantially decrease hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Costo de Enfermedad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Incertidumbre , Adulto , Benzodiazepinas/economía , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/economía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors associated with high-cost inpatient admissions for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Operative hospitalizations for ovarian cancer patients ≥65 years of age were identified using the 2010-2017 National Inpatient Sample. Admissions with high-cost were defined as those incurring ≥90th percentile of hospitalization costs each year, while the remainder were considered low-cost. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to assess independent predictors of being in the high-cost cohort. RESULTS: During the study period, an estimated 58,454 patients met inclusion criteria. 5827 patient admissions (9.98%) were classified as high-cost. Median hospitalization cost for this high-cost group was $55,447 (interquartile range (IQR) $46,744-$74,015) compared to $16,464 (IQR $11,845-$23,286, p < 0.001) for the low-cost group. Patients with high-cost admissions were more likely to have received open (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.23, 1.31-3.79) or extended (AOR 5.64, 4.79-6.66) procedures and be admitted non-electively (AOR 3.32, 2.74-4.02). Being in the top income quartile (AOR 1.77, 1.39-2.27) was also associated with high-cost. Age and hospital factors, including bed size and volume of gynecologic oncology surgery, did not affect cost group. CONCLUSION: High-cost ovarian cancer admissions were three times more expensive than low-cost admissions. Fewer open and extended procedures with subsequently shorter lengths of stay may have contributed to decreasing inpatient costs over the study period. In this cohort of patients largely covered by Medicare, clinical factors outweigh socioeconomic factors as cost drivers. Understanding the relationship of disease-specific and social factors to cost will be important in informing future value-based quality improvement efforts in gynecologic cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Geografía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: 1.) To compare frequency of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer treatment before and after publication of the phase III study by van Driel et al. in January 2018. 2.) To compare associated rates of hospital-based outcomes, including length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, complications, and costs in ovarian cancer surgery with or without HIPEC. METHODS: We queried Vizient's administrative claims database of 550 US hospitals for ovarian cancer surgeries from January 2016-January 2020 using ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes. Sodium thiosulfate administration was used to identify HIPEC cases according to the published protocol. Student t-tests and relative risk (RR) were used to compare continuous variables and contingency tables, respectively. RESULTS: 152 ovarian cancer patients had HIPEC at 39 hospitals, and 20,014 ovarian cancer patients had surgery without HIPEC at 256 hospitals. Following the trial publication, 97% of HIPEC cases occurred. During the index admission, HIPEC patients had longer median length of stay (8.4 vs. 5.7 days, p < 0.001) and higher percentage of ICU admissions (63.1% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001) and complication rates (RR = 1.87, p = 0.002). Index admission direct costs ($21,825 vs. $12,038, p < 0.001) and direct cost index (observed/expected costs) (1.87 vs. 1.11, p < 0.001) were also greater in the HIPEC patients. No inpatient deaths or 30-day readmissions were identified after HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: Use of HIPEC for ovarian cancer increased in the US after publication of a phase III clinical trial in a high-impact journal, though the absolute number of cases remains modest. Incorporation of HIPEC was associated with increased cost, hospital length of stay, ICU admission, and hospital-acquired complication rates. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate long-term outcomes, including morbidity and survival.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/tendencias , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/economía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/economía , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/cirugía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients who fall while taking an anticoagulant have a small but significant risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage requiring observation for 24 h. However, the medical complexity associated with geriatric care may necessitate a longer stay in the hospital. Little is known about the factors associated with a successful observational status stay (<2 d) for this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elderly patients who fell while taking an anticoagulant admitted from 2012 to 2017 at an ACS level II trauma center were included in a retrospective cohort study to determine what factors were associated with a stay consistent with observational status. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age> 65 y old, negative initial head CT, and one of the following: INR>3.5 if on warfarin, GCS<14, external signs of trauma, or focal neurological deficits. RESULTS: The cohort included 369 patients. Factors associated with decreased likelihood of successful observational status included the need for services after discharge such as an extended care facility (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.19, P < 0.001) or visiting nurse agency services (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.75, P < 0.001), a dementia diagnosis (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.70, P = 0.014), increasing number of medications (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, P = 0.031), and the use of coumadin (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.70, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: For trauma providers, knowing your patient's medication use and particularly type of anticoagulant, comorbidities including dementia, and likely need for services after discharge will help guide the decision to admit the patient for what may be a reasonably lengthy stay versus a brief observation in the hospital for elderly fall victims on anticoagulation.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/economía , Traumatismos Cerrados de la Cabeza/etiología , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rapid deceleration against a seat belt during a motor vehicle collision (MVC) may result in an abdominal seat belt sign (ASBS), which is associated with a higher risk of hollow viscus injury (HVI). After a negative abdominal CT scan, management of patients with ASBS is variable, but recent evidence suggests emergency department (ED) discharge may be safe. Therefore, we hypothesized that discharge from the ED is cost-effective compared with 23-h observation or hospital admission for patients with ASBS and a negative CT. METHODS: A cost-utility model was developed for an evaluable patient with ASBS and negative CT scan using TreeAge software. ED discharge was compared with 23-h observation and admission. Analysis was from a health care-based third-party payer perspective. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on 3-y expected outcomes. Probability and costs were estimated from published literature and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. RESULTS: In our base case, ED discharge was the most cost-effective strategy, yielding a cost of $706 with 2.86 QALYs. The average costs of 23-h observation and hospital admission were $2600 and $8,827, respectively, with 2.87 QALYs gained each. The strategy of ED observation becomes cost-effective when the rate of HVI after ED discharge exceeds 2.3%. In a Monte Carlo simulation, ED discharge was the optimal strategy in 91% of 1000 trials of the model. CONCLUSIONS: ED discharge is a cost-effective strategy for evaluable patients with ASBS and a negative abdominal CT and remains so when the risk of HVI after ED discharge is higher than currently assumed.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Accidentes de Tránsito , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cinturones de Seguridad/efectos adversos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/economía , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología , Adulto , Simulación por Computador , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Estadísticos , Método de Montecarlo , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/economía , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown a consistent impact of socioeconomic status at birth for both mother and child; however, no study has looked at its impact on hospital efficiency and financial balance at birth, which could be major if newborns from disadvantaged families have an average length of stay (LOS) longer than other newborns. Our objective was therefore to study the association between socioeconomic status and hospital efficiency and financial balance in that population. METHODS: A study was carried out using exhaustive national hospital discharge databases. All live births in a maternity hospital located in mainland France between 2012 and 2014 were included. Socioeconomic status was estimated with an ecological indicator and efficiency by variations in patient LOS compared with different mean national LOS. Financial balance was assessed at the admission level through the ratio of production costs and revenues and at the hospital level by the difference in aggregated revenues and production costs for said hospital. Multivariate regression models studied the association between those indicators and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A total of 2 149 454 births were included. LOS was shorter than the national means for less disadvantaged patients and longer for the more disadvantaged patients, which increased when adjusted for gestational age, birth weight, and severity. A 1% increase in disadvantaged patients in a hospital's case mix significantly increased the probability that the hospital would be in deficit by 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Reforms should be made to hospital payment methods to take into account patient socioeconomic status so as to improve resource allocation efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Maternidades/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Clase Social , Presupuestos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Evaluación de Necesidades/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/economía , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2014, Maryland launched a population-based payment model that replaced fee-for-service payments with global budgets for all hospital-based services. This global budget revenue program gives hospitals strong incentives to tightly control patient volume and meet budget targets. We examine the effects of the global budget revenue model on rates of admission to the hospital from emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We used medical record and billing data to examine adult ED encounters from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015, in 25 hospital-based EDs, including 10 Maryland global budget revenue hospitals, 10 matched non-Maryland hospitals (primary control), and 5 Maryland Total Patient Revenue hospitals (secondary control). Total Patient Revenue hospitals adopted global budgeting in 2010 under a pilot Maryland program targeting rural hospitals. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses for overall ED admission rates, ED admission rates for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions, and for clinical conditions that commonly lead to admission. RESULTS: In 3,175,210 ED encounters, the ED admission rate for Maryland global budget revenue hospitals decreased by 0.6% (95% confidence interval -0.8% to -0.4%) compared with that for non-Maryland controls after global budget revenue implementation, a 3.0% relative decline, and decreased by 1.9% (95% confidence interval -2.2% to -1.7%) compared with that for Total Patient Revenue hospitals, a 9.5% relative decline. Relative declines in ED admission rates were similar for ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition encounters. Admission rate declines varied across clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the global budget revenue model led to statistically significant although modest declines in ED admission rates within its first 2 years, with declines in ED admissions most pronounced among certain clinical conditions.
Asunto(s)
Presupuestos/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economíaRESUMEN
Objective: Although the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids (SCs) in acute asthma exacerbations is well established, the fact that many children still require admission to hospital and that SCs have a slow onset of action are cause of concern. For this reason, the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a therapy added to SCs has been explored, with no clarity about its cost-effectiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ICS in addition to SCs (ICS + SCs) compared to standard therapy with SCs for treating pediatric asthma exacerbations.Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of SCs compared to ICS + SCs for treating pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbations. Effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Cost data obtained from hospital bills and from the national manual of drug prices. The study was carried out from the perspective of the national healthcare system in Colombia. The main outcome of the model was avoidance of hospital admission.Results: For the base-case analysis, the model showed that compared to SCs, therapy with ICS + SCs was associated with lower total costs (US$88.76 vs.US$97.71 average cost per patient) and a lower probability of hospital admission (0.9060 vs. 0.9000), thus showing dominance.Conclusions: This study shows that compared with standard therapy with SCs, ICS + SCs for treating pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbations is the preferred strategy because it was associated with a lower probability of hospital admission, at lower total treatment costs.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Brote de los Síntomas , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Asma/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) may progress to advanced liver disease (AdvLD). This study characterized comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs among hospitalized patients with AdvLD due to NASH in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/NASH patients from 2011 to 2017 were identified from administrative databases of Italian local health units using ICD-9-CM codes. Development of compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or liver transplant (LT) was identified using first diagnosis date for each severity cohort (index-date). Patients progressing to multiple disease stages were included in >1 cohort. Patients were followed from index-date until the earliest of disease progression, end of coverage, death, or end of study. Within each cohort, per member per month values were annualized to calculate all-cause HCRU or costs() in 2017. Of the 9,729 hospitalized NAFLD/NASH patients identified, 97% were without AdvLD, 1.3% had CC, 3.1% DCC, 0.8% HCC, 0.1% LT. Comorbidity burden was high across all cohorts. Mean annual number of inpatient services was greater in patients with AdvLD than without AdvLD. Similar trends were observed in outpatient visits and pharmacy fills. Mean total annual costs increased with disease severity, driven primarily by inpatient services costs. CONCLUSION: NAFLD/NASH patients in Italy have high comorbidity burden. AdvLD patients had significantly higher costs. The higher prevalence of DCC compared to CC in this population may suggest challenges of effectively screening and identifying NAFLD/NASH patients. Early identification and effective management are needed to reduce risk of disease progression and subsequent HCRU and costs.
Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud/economía , Costos de Hospital , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/economía , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/terapia , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pneumococcal vaccination has been shown to reduce occurrence of invasive pneumococcal diseases in elderly patients. In this study, we investigated the real-world efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination implemented in elderly individuals in Japan. We reviewed the in-patient database of Juntendo University Hospital and selected elderly patients (≥65 years-old) who had received in-patient care in the general medicine department during 2014-2018. A total of 1355 patients were retrospectively enrolled and comprised of 1045 unvaccinated and 315 vaccinated elderly individuals. Prior vaccination was found associated with all-cause shorter hospital stays (adjusted RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.76) and less medical expenditure (adjusted RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.87) compared with no vaccination, as well as protection for all-cause in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.83). The association of shorter hospital stays and less medical expenditure with vaccination was also observed in the context of pneumonia, although no altered risk in mortality was observed. In conclusion, this study is one of the first reporting real-world data after the initiation of pneumococcal vaccination program in 2014 in Japan. The national PPV23 vaccination program contributed to the reduction of all-cause in-patient days, mortality, and medical expenses in the elderly aged ≥65 years. Further data is warranted to evaluate the contribution from influenza vaccination and protein-conjugate based pneumococcal vaccine.