Novel use of video glasses during binocular microscopy in the otolaryngology clinic.

INTRODUCTION: The development of portable, high resolution video displays such as video glasses allows clinicians the opportunity to offer patients an increased ability to visualize aspects of their physical examination in an ergonomic and cost-effective manner. The objective of this pilot study is to trial the use of video glasses for patients undergoing binocular microscopy as well as to better understand some of the potential benefits of the enhanced display option. METHODS: This study was comprised of a single treatment group. Patients seen in the otolaryngology clinic who required binocular microscopy for diagnosis and treatment were recruited. All patients wore video glasses during their otoscopic examination. An additional cohort of patients who required binocular microscopy were also recruited, but did not use the video glasses during their examination. Patients subsequently completed a 10-point Likert scale survey that assessed their comfort, anxiety, and satisfaction with the examination as well as their general understanding of their otologic condition. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients who used the video glasses were recruited, including those with normal examinations, cerumen impaction, or chronic ear disease. Based on the survey results, patients reported a high level of satisfaction and comfort during their exam with video glasses. Patients who used the video glasses did not exhibit any increased anxiety with their examination. Patients reported that video glasses improved their understanding and they expressed a desire to wear the glasses again during repeat exams. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates that video glasses may represent a viable alternative display option in the otolaryngology clinic. The results show that the use of video glasses is associated with high patient comfort and satisfaction during binocular microscopy. Further investigation is warranted to determine the potential for this display option in other facets of patient care as well as in expanding patient understanding of disease and anatomy.

Comparison of Objective and Subjective Changes Induced by Multiple-Pinhole Glasses and Single-Pinhole Glasses.

Multiple-pinhole (MPH) glasses are currently sold in many countries with unproven advertisements; however, their objective and subjective effects have not been investigated. Therefore, to investigate the effects of MPH glasses excluding the single-pinhole (SPH) effect, we compared the visual functional changes, reading speed, and ocular discomfort after reading caused by MPH and SPH glasses. Healthy 36 participants with a mean age of 33.1 years underwent examinations of pupil size, visual acuity (VA), depth of focus (DOF), and near point accommodation (NPA); tests for visual field (VF), contrast sensitivity (CS), stereopsis, and reading speed; and a survey of ocular discomfort after reading. Both types of pinhole glasses enlarged pupil diameter and improved VA, DOF, and NPA. However, CS, stereopsis, and VF parameters deteriorated. In comparison with SPH glasses, MPH glasses induced smaller pupil dilation (5.3 and 5.9 mm, P < 0.001) and showed better VF parameters with preserved peripheral VF. However, no significant difference was observed for VA, DOF, NPA, stereopsis, and CS. Reading speed using pinhole glasses was significantly slower than baseline; SPH glasses showed the slowest reading speed. Both types of glasses caused significant ocular discomfort after reading compared with baseline, and symptoms were worst with MPH glasses. In conclusion, both types of pinhole glasses had positive effects due to the pinhole effect; however, they had negative effects on VF, CS, stereopsis, reading speed, and ocular discomfort. In spite of the increased luminance and preserved peripheral VF with MPHs, these glasses caused more severe ocular discomfort than SPH glasses.

Photochromic dynamics of ophthalmic lenses.

We describe and characterize a straightforward test setup for characterizing temporal and spectral dynamics of photochromic spectacle materials. Three measurement examples of contemporary silicate and organic photochromic spectacles are provided. The setup showed a good absolute accuracy of ≤5% of the luminous transmittance (τ(v)) and repeatability of better than 3%. The samples showed different fading times. The sample with the highest dynamic range was the slowest and showed a noticeable change in the transmission spectra during deactivation. The silicate had the lowest dynamic range but also the most homogeneous transmission spectra throughout activation and deactivation. The proposed test device provided accurate results for spectral and temporal dynamics of photochromic materials under realistic conditions.

Myopia-correcting lenses decrease eye fatigue in a visual search task for both adolescents and adults.

The steady, world-wide increase in myopia prevalence in children over the past decades has raised concerns. As an early intervention for axial-length-related myopia, correcting lenses have been developed (such as Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segment (DIMS) lenses), which have been shown to be effective in slowing myopia progression. Beyond this direct effect, however, it is not known whether such lenses also affect other aspects important to the wearer, such as eye fatigue, and how such effects may differ across age, as these lenses so far are typically only tested with adolescents. In the present work, we therefore investigated perceived fatigue levels according to lens type (normal vs DIMS) and age (adolescents vs adults) in a demanding visual search task ("Finding Wally") at two difficulty levels (easy vs difficult). Whereas age and difficulty did not result in significant differences in eye fatigue, we found a clear reduction of fatigue levels in both age groups when wearing the correcting lenses. Hence, the additional accommodation of these lens types may result in less strain in a task requiring sustained eye movements at near viewing distances.

Evaluating the myopia progression control efficacy of defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) lenses and Apollo progressive addition spectacle lenses (PALs) in 6- to 12-year-old children: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Myopia is increasing in prevalence and is currently recognized as a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly in China. Once myopia develops, appropriate clinical interventions need to be prescribed to slow its progression. Currently, several publications indicate that myopic defocus (MD) retards eye growth and myopia progression. However, no clinical trials have compared the outcomes of different MD spectacle lenses in the same observational group, especially in mainland China. The aim of the present study is to compare the myopia control efficiency of two different MD spectacle lenses: defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) lenses and Apollo progressive addition lenses (PALs). METHODS: The trial is designed as a 3-year, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of schoolchildren treated with DIMS lenses and PALs. A total of 600 Chinese primary school children aged 6-12 years will be recruited, and each group is intended to include 300 subjects. The inclusion criteria are myopia between - 1.00 and - 5.00 diopters and astigmatism ≤ 1.50 diopters. The follow-up time points will be 1 month (m), 3 m, 6 m, 12 m, 18 m, 24 m, 30 m, and 36 m. The primary outcome will be determined by the difference between the two groups in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction between baseline and the last follow-up visit. The secondary outcome is the axial length, and the exploratory outcomes include ocular biometric measures, peripheral refraction, binocular vision, accommodation, compliance, and the results of questionnaires related to wearing experiences. DISCUSSION: The present study will be the first randomized controlled trial in myopic primary school children treated with DIMS lenses and PALs in China. The results will indicate whether and how much different MD mechanisms retard myopia progression and axial elongation. In addition, the comparison will provide information on the clinical efficacy and safety of DIMS lenses and PALs, including information related to wearing experiences and visual function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR1900025645. Registered on 3 September 2019. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=42927.

Effect of unifocal versus multifocal lenses on cervical spine posture in patients with presbyopia.

Significance. There are many environmental considerations which may or may not lead to the development of faulty cervical mechanics. The design of near-vision lenses could contribute to the development of such cervical dysfunction and consequently neck pain. Decision-making regarding the proper type of lens prescription seems important for presbyopic individuals. Purpose. To investigate the effect of unifocal and multifocal lenses on cervical posture. Methods. Thirty subjects (18 females and 12 males) participated in the study with an age range from 40 to 64 years. Each subject wore consequently both unifocal and multifocal lenses randomly while reading. Lateral cervical spine X-ray films were taken for each subject during each lens wearing. X-ray films were analyzed with digital software (AutoCAD 2D version 22) to measure segmental angles of the cervical vertebrae (occiput/C1, C1/C2, C2/C3, C3/C4, C4/C5, C5/C6, C6/C7, C3/C7, C0/C3, and occiput/C7). Results. Higher significant extension angles were observed in the segments C0/C7, C1/C2, C5/C6, C6/C7 and C3/C7 (p < 0.05) during multifocal lens wearing, in contrast to higher flexion angles between C3/C4 and C4/C5 (p < 0.05) when wearing unifocal lenses. Conclusion. Multifocal lens spectacles produce increased extension in the cervical vertebrae angles when compared with the use of unifocal lenses.

[Anisometropia and presbyopia: prescription of progressive lenses, a new approach]. / Anisométropie et presbytie: équipements en verres progressifs, nouvelle approche.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To show that anisometropia does not absolutely preclude the prescription of progressive lenses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one anisometropes and presbyopes were selected for a prolonged trial of visual correction using progressive lenses. The congenital or acquired type of their anisometropia and its particular form were also studied. Each patient was submitted to a protocol comprising of a series of ophthalmologic and orthoptic tests so as to evaluate the patient's subjective far and near refraction, with measurement of phorias and of horizontal and vertical ductions, visual acuity, and the quality of binocular vision while looking in different directions. A preliminary trial of correction in actual situation was done in order to check fusion in near vision. The entire range of tests was repeated two months after the patient was provided with the lenses. The tolerance for progressive lenses during the different activities of daily life was evaluated after the second and the sixth months. RESULTS: Seven patients presenting an associated strabismus were not provided with the lenses because the initial pre-lens trial revealed a total inability to read within the near-vision zone. Among the 34 patients provided with the lenses, 21 constantly wore their progressive lenses and said that they were satisfied, 6 wore their progressive lenses during daily activities but preferred to use their unifocal lenses for prolonged reading, and 7 abandoned their progressive lenses because they could not tolerate them. Association with a strabismus is not synonymous with an initial impossibility or with abandonment because of the 27 patients who constantly wore their progressive lenses 9 were strabismic. The best results were obtained in the age range of 45 to 52 years old, for visual acuity for > 20/40, and in cases of congenital anisometropia with intermittent or permanent unilateral neutralization. On the other hand, patients presenting an acquired anisometropia, particularly postoperative, proved to be poor candidates. CONCLUSION: Weak and strong anisometropia does not absolutely preclude the prescription of progressive lenses except for certain strabismic subjects with an abnormal lateral-oriented posture.

Attempts to reduce the progression of myopia and spectacle prescriptions during childhood: a survey of eye specialists.

PURPOSE: To determine methods tried in clinical trials to reduce the progression of myopia in children, and spectacle prescribing patterns of hospital ophthalmologists. METHODS: A multi-sectioned survey composed of Likert items relating to the methods of reducing myopia progression (orthokeratology lenses [O-K lenses], undercorrected glasses, and topical atropine) and the patterns of prescribing spectacles for children (including two cases involving a 5-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy) were distributed to members of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, and the collected data was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 78 out of 130 ophthalmologists returned the survey. On a scale of 1 to 5, the mean rates of whether the ophthalmologists think O-K lenses arrest myopia progression, and whether they recommend their patients to wear O-K lenses if indicative, were 3.06 and 2.75, respectively. Moreover, the mean rates of whether they consider that wearing glasses which are undercorrected would slow down the progression of the myopia, or if they think topical atropine helps in arresting myopia progression in children, were 2.34 and 1.27, respectively. In response to the case studies, the majority of practitioners preferred to prescribe the full amount found in cycloplegic refraction to pediatric patients with myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists in clinical practice encouraged children to wear O-K lenses more than undercorrected glasses as a way to retard myopia progression. However, the application of atropine is rarely tried in clinical trials. In managing pediatric patients with myopia (case specific), the majority of the practitioners chose to prescribe glasses with full cycloplegic correction.

Attempts to Reduce the Progression of Myopia and Spectacle Prescriptions during Childhood: A Survey of Eye Specialists

PURPOSE: To determine methods tried in clinical trials to reduce the progression of myopia in children, and spectacle prescribing patterns of hospital ophthalmologists. METHODS: A multi-sectioned survey composed of Likert items relating to the methods of reducing myopia progression (orthokeratology lenses [O-K lenses], undercorrected glasses, and topical atropine) and the patterns of prescribing spectacles for children (including two cases involving a 5-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy) were distributed to members of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, and the collected data was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 78 out of 130 ophthalmologists returned the survey. On a scale of 1 to 5, the mean rates of whether the ophthalmologists think O-K lenses arrest myopia progression, and whether they recommend their patients to wear O-K lenses if indicative, were 3.06 and 2.75, respectively. Moreover, the mean rates of whether they consider that wearing glasses which are undercorrected would slow down the progression of the myopia, or if they think topical atropine helps in arresting myopia progression in children, were 2.34 and 1.27, respectively. In response to the case studies, the majority of practitioners preferred to prescribe the full amount found in cycloplegic refraction to pediatric patients with myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists in clinical practice encouraged children to wear O-K lenses more than undercorrected glasses as a way to retard myopia progression. However, the application of atropine is rarely tried in clinical trials. In managing pediatric patients with myopia (case specific), the majority of the practitioners chose to prescribe glasses with full cycloplegic correction.

Breve historia de los anteojos / A short history of glasses

No disponible

Is esophoria a factor in slowing of myopia by progressive lenses?

PURPOSE: Our previous findings suggest that myopia can be slowed by wearing progressive lenses, and one possible mechanism for this is through the oculomotor system. We reanalyzed our findings to investigate the relationship between baseline oculomotor parameters and change in refraction, and between the change in these values and change in refraction. METHODS: Children who wore progressive lenses (N = 38; 26 with +1.50 D addition, and 16 with +2.00 D addition) or single-vision lenses (N = 32) had refraction, distance heterophoria, near heterophoria, and stimulus AC/A ratio measured prospectively over a 2-year period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant correlations between baseline heterophoria or AC/A values and change in refractive error. Distance and near heterophoria did not change significantly over the 2 years of the experiment; AC/A ratio decreased significantly, but in an equivalent manner for both groups. In the combined progressive lens group, change toward more exophoria at near was associated with less myopia progression. However three-way analysis of variance (visit x lens type x esophoria/nonesophoria) showed significant main effects in refraction over all five visits. There was a significant interaction between lens type and visits; there was no significant interaction between lens type and esophoria/ nonesophoria grouping. Three-way analysis of variance showed a statistically significant decrease of AC/A ratio over all five visits; there was no interaction of visit by lens or visit by phoria grouping. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no statistically significant differences between esophoric and nonesophoric subjects, there was only 46% as much myopia progression in the progressive lenses-esophoric group as in the progressive lenses-nonesophoric group. In addition, there were no differences in AC/A ratio between esophoric and nonesophoric subjects. However these findings are not definitive. This experiment was not designed to discriminate between refraction and oculomotor changes in esophoric and nonesophoric subjects and lacked the necessary statistical power to do so.

Refraçäo: cilindro cruzado; consequências da ciclopegia e miopizaçäo. Bifocais e multifocais / Refraction: crossed cylinder; consequence of cycloplegia and myopia. Bifocals and multifocals

Os autores discutem os aspectos opticos e práticos da prescriçäo de óculos e a adiçäo para a presbiopia. Os bifocais, trifocais e multifocais säo discutidos e seus aspectos opticos analisados. Todos os multifocais necessitam compensar a aberraçäo lateral com reduçäo da área de leitura