Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 179
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 258: 170-178, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Access to health care is an important issue, particularly in remote areas. Since 2010, 106 rural hospital have closed in the United States, potentially limiting geographic access to health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these hospital closures on the proportion of the population who can reach a secondary care facility, by road, within 15, 30, 45, or 60 min. METHODS: Geographical information system analysis, using population data obtained from the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau and hospital data between 2010 and 2019 from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, created 15-, 30-, 45-, and 60-min drive time isochrones (areas from which a central location can be reached within a set time). RESULTS: Rural hospital closures resulted in 0%-0.97% of the population no longer being able to access a hospital within 15 min. The most marked changes were in the East South Central (0.97%, 178,478 residents) and West South Central (0.54%, 197,660 residents) divisions. Lesser degrees of change were noted for longer drive times. The changes were more marked when the rural population was analyzed exclusively. CONCLUSIONS: Recent closures of rural hospitals in the United States have impacted population access to hospital care, although the extent varies. There are regions, such as the Southern and Southeastern United States, which demonstrate greater and potentially more concerning losses in population coverage, probably because of the greater number of closures. Future work should evaluate clinical implications of hospital closures and loss of population coverage.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Espacial , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 31(3): 579-590, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32019784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2011, inclusion of injectable medications into an expanded ESKD payment bundle prompted concerns that dialysis facilities facing higher costs might close, disrupting care delivery and access to care. Whether this policy change influenced dialysis facility closures is unknown. METHODS: To examine whether facility closures increased after 2011 and whether factors influencing closures changed, we analyzed US Renal Data System registry data to identify all patients receiving in-center hemodialysis from 2006 through 2015 and to track dialysis facility closures. We used interrupted time series logistic regression models and estimated marginal effects to examine immediate and longer-term changes in the likelihood of being affected by facility closures following payment reform. We also examined whether associations between selected predictors of closures indicating populations at "high risk" of closure (patient characteristics, facility characteristics, and geography-related characteristics) and closures changed after payment reform. RESULTS: Dialysis facility closures were uncommon over the study period. In adjusted models, the relative odds of experiencing a closure declined by 37% (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59 to 0.67) immediately after payment reform and declined by an additional 6% (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.97) annually thereafter, corresponding to a 0.3% lower absolute probability of closure in 2015 in association with payment reform. Patients who were black and who dialyzed at small, hospital-based facilities experienced slight increases in closures following payment reform, whereas Hispanic and Medicare/Medicaid dual-eligible patients experienced slight decreases in closures. CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of the ESKD payment bundle was not associated with increased closure of dialysis facilities, although the likelihood of closures changed slightly for some higher-risk populations.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Hemodiálisis en Hospital/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Registros , Diálisis Renal/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/economía , Unidades de Hemodiálisis en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
3.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(6): 945-952, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reductions in primary care and specialist physicians follow rural hospital closures. As the supply of physicians declines, rural healthcare systems increasingly rely on nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to deliver care. PURPOSE: We sought to examine the extent to which rural hospital closures are associated with changes in the NP and CRNA workforce. METHOD: Using Area Health Resources Files (AHRF) data from 2010-2017, we used an event-study design to estimate the relationship between rural hospital closures and changes in the supply of NPs and CRNAs. FINDINGS: Among 1,544 rural counties, we observed 151 hospital closures. After controlling for local market characteristics, we did not find a significant relationship between hospital closure and the supply of NPs and CRNAs. DISCUSSION: We do not find evidence that NPs and CRNAs respond to rural hospital closures by leaving the healthcare market.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Enfermeras Anestesistas/provisión & distribución , Enfermeras Practicantes/provisión & distribución , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Enfermeras Anestesistas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pobreza , Servicios de Salud Rural/provisión & distribución
4.
Emerg Med J ; 36(11): 645-651, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In England the demand for emergency care is increasing, while there is also a staffing shortage. This has implications for quality of care and patient safety. One solution may be to concentrate resources on fewer sites by closing or downgrading emergency departments (EDs). Our aim was to quantify the impact of such reorganisation on population mortality. METHODS: We undertook a controlled interrupted time series analysis to detect the impact of closing or downgrading five EDs, which occurred due to concerns regarding sustainability. We obtained mortality data from 2007 to 2014 using national databases. To establish ED resident catchment populations, estimated journey times by road were supplied by the Department for Transport. Other major changes in the emergency and urgent care system were determined by analysis of annual NHS Trust reports in each geographical area studied. Our main outcome measures were mortality and case fatality for a set of 16 serious emergency conditions. RESULTS: For residents in the areas affected by closure, journey time to the nearest ED increased (median change 9 min, range 0-25 min). We found no statistically reliable evidence of a change in overall mortality following reorganisation of ED care in any of the five areas or overall (+2.5% more deaths per month on average; 95% CI -5.2% to +10.2%; p=0.52). There was some evidence to suggest that, on average across the five areas, there was a small increase in case fatality, an indicator of the 'risk of death' (+2.3%, 95% CI +0.9% to+3.6%; p<0.001), but this may have arisen due to changes in hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that reorganisation of emergency care was associated with a change in population mortality in the five areas studied. Further research should establish the economic consequences and impact on patient experience and neighbouring hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Inglaterra , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido
5.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 488, 2018 04 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650010

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on outbreaks of infectious gastroenteritis in care homes have been collected using an internet-based surveillance system in North West England since 2012. We analysed the burden and characteristics of care home outbreaks to inform future public health decision-making. METHODS: We described characteristics of care homes and summary measures of the outbreaks such as attack rate, duration and pathogen identified. The primary analysis outcome was duration of closure following an outbreak. We used negative binomial regression to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) and confidence intervals (CI) for each explanatory variable. RESULTS: We recorded 795 outbreaks from 379 care homes (37.1 outbreaks per 100 care homes per year). In total 11,568 cases, 75 hospitalisations and 29 deaths were reported. Closure within three days of the first case (IRR = 0.442, 95%CI 0.366-0.534) was significantly associated with reduced duration of closure. The total size of the home (IRR = 1.426, 95%CI = 1.275-1.595) and the total attack rate (IRR = 1.434, 95%CI = 1.257-1.595) were significantly associated with increased duration of closure. CONCLUSIONS: Care homes that closed promptly had outbreaks of shorter duration. Care home providers, and those advising them on infection control, should aim to close homes quickly to prevent lengthy disruption to services.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Gastroenteritis/prevención & control , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Instituciones Residenciales , Anciano , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Med Care ; 55(1): 50-56, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27547950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2002 British Columbia, Canada began redistributing its hospital services. OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We used administrative data and interrupted time series analyses to determine how recent hospital closures affected patient outcomes. SUBJECTS: All adult acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and trauma events in British Columbia between fiscal years 1999 and 2013. Cases were patients whose closest hospital closed. Controls were matched by condition, year of event, and condition-specific hospital volume where treatment was received. MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality and hospital bypass rates. RESULTS: We matched 3267 AMI, 2852 stroke, and 6318 trauma cases to 1996, 1604, and 3640 controls, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate at baseline was 7.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0%-10.1%] for AMI, 5.3% (95% CI, 2.4%-8.1%) for stroke, and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.1%) for trauma controls. The 30-day mortality rate for cases was 14.3% (95% CI, 7.1%-21.7%) for AMI, 12.0% (95% CI, 5.1%-18.9%) for stroke, and 3.1% for trauma (95% CI, 0.9%-5.2%) cases. There was no significant change in 30-day mortality for cases, and no significant difference in change in mortality rates between cases and controls following the intervention. The difference in hospital bypass rates between cases and controls was 50.1% (95% CI, 42.3%-57.9%) for AMI, 36.2% (95% CI, 27.4%-44.9%) for stroke, and 32.2% (95% CI, 27.7%-36.8%) for trauma cases preintervention. Following the intervention, the difference in bypass rates dropped by 15.5% (95% CI, 3.5%-27.5%) for AMI, 25.3% (95% CI, 11.7%-38.8%) for stroke, and 22.7% (95% CI, 15.7%-29.6%) for trauma cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital closures did not affect patient mortality.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Colombia Británica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Geografía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Tratamiento
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(7): 1262-4, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117656

RESUMEN

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Low reimbursement from the uninsured has been claimed to threaten hospital finances and even hospital emergency department (ED) closure. We hypothesized in advance of beginning data collection that states that expanded Medicaid ("expansion states") under the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would experience a reduced rate of ED closure compared with states that did not. METHODS: We compiled a national census of EDs from 2006 through 2013 from federal databases and manually confirmed each closure. We used difference-in-differences regression on this longitudinal panel to compare the probability over time that a hospital was in operation in expansion states to nonexpansion states. RESULTS: The number of hospitals grew every year nationally and in nonexpansion states. In expansion states, the number fell from 2027 in 2009 to 2019 in 2010, not surpassing the 2009 peak until 2012. In regression estimates, hospitals in expansion states were 2.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%) less likely to be in operation after 2010 compared with the trend in nonexpansion states. CONCLUSIONS: States that expanded Medicaid experienced increased, rather than reduced, ED closure rates from 2010 through 2013. The financial benefits of the Affordable Care Act may be poorly targeted to the hospitals most vulnerable to closure.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Estados Unidos
8.
Acta Orthop ; 87(2): 126-31, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26541178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effects of launch or closure of an entire arthroplasty unit on the first or last patients treated in these units have not been studied. Using a 3-year follow-up, we investigated whether patients who were treated at the launch or closure stage of an arthroplasty unit of a hospital would have a higher risk of reoperation than patients treated in-between at the same units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, we identified all the units that had performed total joint arthroplasty and the units that were launched or closed in Finland between 1998 and 2011. The risks of reoperation within 3 years for the 41,748 total hip and knee replacements performed due to osteoarthritis in these units were modeled with Cox proportional-hazards regression, separately for hip and knee and for the launch and the closure stage. RESULTS: The unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for total hip and knee replacements performed in the initial stage of activity of the units that were launched were similar to the reoperation risks in patients who were operated in these units after the early stage of activity. The unadjusted and risk-adjusted HRs for early reoperation after total hip replacement (THR) were increased at the closure stage (adjusted HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.8). The reoperation risk at the closure stage after total knee replacement (TKR) was not increased. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that closure of units performing total hip replacements poses an increased risk of reoperation. Closures need to be managed carefully to prevent the quality from deteriorating when performing the final arthroplasties.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Falla de Prótesis/tendencias , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Health Econ ; 24 Suppl 1: 132-45, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25760588

RESUMEN

This study investigates the causes of full closure of care homes in the English care home/nursing home market. We develop theoretical arguments about two causes for closure that are triggered by errors or external shocks: poor economic sustainability and regulatory action. Homes aiming to operate with lower quality in the market are argued for a number of reasons to be more susceptible to errors/shocks in setting quality, especially negative errors, leading to an empirical hypothesis that observed quality should negatively affect closure chance. In addition, given quality, homes facing relatively high levels of local competition should also have an increased chance of closure. We use a panel of care homes from 2008 and 2010 to examine factors affecting their closure status in subsequent years. We allow for the potential endogeneity of home quality and use multiple imputation to replace missing data. Results suggest that homes with comparatively higher quality and/or lower levels of competition have less chance of closure than other homes. We discuss that the results provide some support for the policy of regulators providing quality information to potential purchasers in the market.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Casas de Salud/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido
12.
Schmerz ; 29(6): 616-24, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26341376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain clinics provide interdisciplinary therapy to treat chronic pain patients and to increase the return-to-work rate. In recent years and due to increased economic pressure in health care, a change in the management of pain in Austrian health care centers has been observed. For the analysis of the current situation, two surveys addressing all Austrian pain clinics were performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 133 heads of Austrian Anesthesia Departments were interviewed online and personally. The data from the first interview were confirmed by an additional telephone survey that was performed by one anesthetist per Austrian state (n = 9). RESULTS: Currently, 44 Austrian pain clinics are active. During the last 5 years, 9 pain clinics closed. Adding the current active pain clinics together, they represent a total of 17.5 full-time-operated clinics. The most common reasons for closing the pain clinics were lack of personnel (47%), lack of time resources (26%), lack of space resources (11%), and financial difficulties (11%). A reduction of >50% of operating hours during the last 3 years was reported by 9 hospitals. The reasons for not running a pain clinic were lack of personnel (36%), lack of time (25%) and department too small (16%). Estimates between actual and required clinics indicate that 49.5 full-time-operating pain clinics are lacking in Austria, resulting in 74% of the Austrian chronic pain patients not receiving interdisciplinary pain management. CONCLUSION: Our survey confirmed the closure of 9 pain clinics during the last 5 years due to lack of personnel and time. Pain clinics appear to provide the simplest economic saving potential. This development is a major concern. Although running a pain clinic seems to be expensive at the first sight, it reduces pain, sick leave, complications, and potential legal issues against health care centers, while simultaneously increasing the hospital's competitiveness. Our results show that 74% of Austrian chronic pain patients do not have access to an interdisciplinary pain clinic. Because of plans to further economize resources, Austria may lose its ability to provide state-of-the-art pain therapy and management.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Clínicas de Dolor , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Austria , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Epidemiol Health ; 46: e2024022, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the changes in health outcomes and the patterns of medical institution utilization among patients with long-term stays in public hospitals following the closure of a public medical center. It also sought to present a proposal regarding the role of public hospitals in countries with healthcare systems predominantly driven by private entities, such as Korea. METHODS: To assess the impact of a public healthcare institution closure on health outcomes in a specific region, we utilized nationally representative health insurance claims data. A retrospective cohort study was conducted for this analysis. RESULTS: An analysis of the medical utilization patterns of patients after the closure of Jinju Medical Center showed that 67.4% of the total medical usage was redirected to long-term care hospitals. This figure is notably high in comparison to the 20% utilization rate of nursing hospitals observed among patients from other medical facilities. These results indicate that former patients of Jinju Medical Center may have experienced limitations in accessing necessary medical services beyond nursing care. After accounting for relevant mortality factors, the analysis showed that the mortality rate in closed public hospitals was 2.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 0.96) times higher than in private hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The closure of public medical institutions has resulted in unmet healthcare needs, and an observed association was observed with increased mortality rates. It is essential to define the role and objectives of public medical institutions, taking into account the distribution of healthcare resources and the conditions of the population.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Anciano de 80 o más Años
14.
J Rural Health ; 40(3): 557-564, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38225679

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Nursing home closures have raised concerns about access to post-acute care (PAC) and long-term care (LTC) services. We estimate the additional distance rural residents had to travel to access PAC and LTC services because of nursing home closures. METHODS: We identify nursing home closures and the availability of PAC and LTC services in nursing homes, home health agencies, and hospitals with swing beds using the Medicare Provider of Services file (2008-2018). Using distances between ZIP codes, we summarize distances to the closest provider of PAC and LTC services for rural and urban ZIP codes with nursing home closures from 2008 to 2018 and no nursing homes in 2018. FINDINGS: Compared to urban ZIP codes, rural ZIP codes experiencing nursing home closure had higher distances to the closest nursing home providing PAC (6.4 vs. 0.94 miles; p < 0.05) and LTC services (7.2 vs. 1.1 miles; p < 0.05), and these differences remain even after accounting for the availability of home health agencies and hospitals with swing beds. Distances to the closest providers with PAC and LTC services were even higher for rural ZIP codes with no nursing homes in 2018. About 6.1%-15.7% of rural ZIP codes with a nursing home closure or with no nursing homes had no PAC or LTC providers within 25 miles. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home closures increased distances to nursing homes, home health agencies, and hospitals with swing beds for rural residents. Access to PAC and LTC services is a concern, especially for rural areas with no nursing homes.


Asunto(s)
Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Casas de Salud , Población Rural , Atención Subaguda , Humanos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/organización & administración , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/organización & administración , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/métodos , Estados Unidos
15.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ ; 13(2): 95-114, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23389814

RESUMEN

Healthcare financing and insurance is changing everywhere. We want to understand the impact that financial pressures can have for the uninsured in advanced economies. To do so we focus on analyzing the effect of the introduction in the US of managed care and the big rise in financial pressures that it implied. Traditionally, in the US safety net hospitals have financed their provision of unfunded care through a complex system of cross-subsidies. Our hypothesis is that financial pressures undermine the ability of a hospital to cross-subsidize and challenges their survival. We focus on the impact of price pressures and cost-controlling mechanisms imposed by managed care. We find that financial pressures imposed by managed care disproportionately affect the closure of safety net hospitals. Moreover, amongst those hospitals that remain open, in areas where managed care penetration increases the most, they react by closing the health services most commonly used by the uninsured.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Atención no Remunerada , Control de Costos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/economía , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes no Asegurados , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/economía , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención no Remunerada/economía , Estados Unidos
16.
Ann Emerg Med ; 60(6): 707-715.e4, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23026784

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We seek to determine whether patients living in areas affected by emergency department (ED) closure, with subsequent increased distance to the nearest ED, have a higher risk of inpatient death from time-sensitive conditions. METHODS: Using the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development database, we performed a nonconcurrent cohort study of hospital admissions in California between 1999 and 2009 for patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models comparing adjusted inpatient mortality for patients experiencing increased distance to the nearest ED versus no change in distance. RESULTS: Of 785,385 patient admissions, 67,577 (8.6%) experienced an increase in distance to ED care because of an ED closure. The median change for patients experiencing an increase in distance to the nearest ED was only 0.8 miles, with a range of 0.1 to 33.4 miles. Patients with an increase did not have a significantly higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.09). In subgroups, we also observed no statistically significant differences in adjusted mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction, stroke, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sepsis. We did not observe any significant variations in mortality for time-sensitive conditions in sensitivity analyses that incorporated a lag effect of time after change in distance, allowance for a larger affected population, or removal of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from the acute myocardial infarction subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this large population-based sample, less than 10% of the patients experienced an increase in distance to the nearest ED, and of that group, the majority had less than a 1-mile increase. These small increased distances to the nearest ED were not associated with higher inpatient mortality among time-sensitive conditions.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asma/mortalidad , Asma/terapia , California/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Adulto Joven
18.
JAMA ; 305(19): 1978-85, 2011 May 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21586713

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Between 1998 and 2008, the number of hospital-based emergency departments (EDs) in the United States declined, while the number of ED visits increased, particularly visits by patients who were publicly insured and uninsured. Little is known about the hospital, community, and market factors associated with ED closures. Federal law requiring EDs to treat all in need regardless of a patient's ability to pay may make EDs more vulnerable to the market forces that govern US health care. OBJECTIVE: To determine hospital, community, and market factors associated with ED closures. DESIGN: Emergency department and hospital organizational information from 1990 through 2009 was acquired from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Surveys (annual response rates ranging from 84%-92%) and merged with hospital financial and payer mix information available through 2007 from Medicare hospital cost reports. We evaluated 3 sets of risk factors: hospital characteristics (safety net [as defined by hospitals caring for more than double their Medicaid share of discharges compared with other hospitals within a 15-mile radius], ownership, teaching status, system membership, ED size, case mix), county population demographics (race, poverty, uninsurance, elderly), and market factors (ownership mix, profit margin, location in a competitive market, presence of other EDs). SETTING: All general, acute, nonrural, short-stay hospitals in the United States with an operating ED anytime from 1990-2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Closure of an ED during the study period. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2009, the number of hospitals with EDs in nonrural areas declined from 2446 to 1779, with 1041 EDs closing and 374 hospitals opening EDs. Based on analysis of 2814 urban acute-care hospitals, constituting 36,335 hospital-year observations over an 18-year study interval (1990-2007), for-profit hospitals and those with low profit margins were more likely to close than their counterparts (cumulative hazard rate based on bivariate model, 26% vs 16%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.1, and 36% vs 18%; HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6-2.3, respectively). Hospitals in more competitive markets had a significantly higher risk of closing their EDs (34% vs 17%; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), as did safety-net hospitals (10% vs 6%; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7) and those serving a higher share of populations in poverty (37% vs 31%; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7). CONCLUSION: From 1990 to 2009, the number of hospital EDs in nonrural areas declined by 27%, with for-profit ownership, location in a competitive market, safety-net status, and low profit margin associated with increased risk of ED closure.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Económica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza , Anciano , American Hospital Association , Recolección de Datos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/economía , Hospitales Privados/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Pacientes no Asegurados , Medicare/economía , Propiedad , Atención no Remunerada/economía , Estados Unidos
19.
JAMA ; 305(23): 2440-7, 2011 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21666277

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Ambulance diversion, a practice in which emergency departments (EDs) are temporarily closed to ambulance traffic, might be problematic for patients experiencing time-sensitive conditions, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is little empirical evidence to show whether diversion is associated with worse patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether temporary ED closure on the day a patient experiences AMI, as measured by ambulance diversion hours of the nearest ED, is associated with increased mortality rates among patients with AMI. DESIGN, STUDY, AND PARTICIPANTS: A case-crossover design of 13,860 Medicare patients with AMI from 508 zip codes within 4 California counties (Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara) whose admission date was between 2000 and 2005. Data included 100% Medicare claims data that covered admissions between 2000 and 2005, linked with date of death until 2006, and daily ambulance diversion logs from the same 4 counties. Among the hospital universe, 149 EDs were identified as the nearest ED to these patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of patients with AMI who died within 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, 9 months, and 1 year from admission (when their nearest ED was not on diversion and when that same ED was exposed to <6, 6 to <12, and ≥12 hours of diversion out of 24 hours on the day of admission). RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2006, the mean (SD) daily diversion duration was 7.9 (6.1) hours. Based on analysis of 11,625 patients admitted to the ED between 2000 and 2005, and whose nearest ED had at least 3 diversion exposure levels (3541, 3357, 2667, and 2060 patients for no exposure, exposure to <6, 6 to <12, and ≥12 hours of diversion, respectively), there were no statistically significant differences in mortality rates between no diversion and exposure to less than 12 hours of diversion. Exposure to 12 or more hours of diversion was associated with higher 30-day mortality vs no diversion status (unadjusted mortality rate, 392 patients [19%] vs 545 patients [15%]; regression adjusted difference, 3.24 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-5.88); higher 90-day mortality (537 patients [26%] vs 762 patients [22%]; 2.89 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.13-5.64); higher 9-month mortality (680 patients [33%] vs 980 patients [28%]; 2.93 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.15-5.71); and higher 1-year mortality (731 patients [35%] vs 1034 patients [29%]; 3.04 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.33-5.75). CONCLUSION: Among Medicare patients with AMI in 4 populous California counties, exposure to at least 12 hours of diversion by the nearest ED was associated with increased 30-day, 90-day, 9-month, and 1-year mortality.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
20.
Med Trop (Mars) ; 71(3): 249-52, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21870550

RESUMEN

Since September 2002, Côte d'Ivoire has been in the throes of armed conflict that has split the country in two. In the government-controlled area, access to health care services has continued. In the area under the control of the "New Forces", access to health care services decreased dramatically due to departure of qualified health personnel and subsequent shutdown of sanitary facilities. The purpose of this transversal descriptive survey was to measure the impact of this crisis on the health care system in the Séguéla sanitary district that is located in the war zone. Findings showed that 60.7% of sanitary facilities are no longer operational, that 77.7% of qualified personnel have left their workstation, and that 46.2% of sanitary structures have been damaged. A few reference hospitals and sanitary facilitates have been able to remain open thanks to the support of the humanitarian organisations. As a result of declining access to health care services, a recrudescence of measles and IST has been observed and gastritis and traumatology have appeared among the top 10 causes of morbidity. Access to effective health care in the Séguéla sanitary district cannot be envisioned without the return of qualified health care personnel and the renovation of the sanitary facilities.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Guerra , Côte d'Ivoire/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA