Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Malar J ; 16(1): 162, 2017 04 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28434407

RESUMEN

Vector control is a task previously relegated to products that (a) kill the mosquitoes directly at different stages (insecticides, larvicides, baited traps), or (b) avoid/reduce human-mosquito contact (bed nets, repellents, house screening), thereby reducing transmission. The potential community-based administration of the endectocide ivermectin with the intent to kill mosquitoes that bite humans, and thus reduce malaria transmission, offers a novel approach using a well-known drug, but additional steps are required to address technical, regulatory and policy gaps. The proposed community administration of this drug presents dual novel paradigms; first, indirect impact on the community rather than on individuals, and second, the use of a drug for vector control. In this paper, the main questions related to the regulatory and policy pathways for such an application are identified. Succinct answers are proposed for how the efficacy, safety, acceptability, cost-effectiveness and programmatic suitability could result in regulatory approval and ultimately policy recommendations on the use of ivermectin as a complementary vector control tool.


Asunto(s)
Regulación Gubernamental , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Insecticidas/farmacología , Ivermectina/farmacología , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Animales , Anopheles
3.
Med Trop (Mars) ; 72 Spec No: 47-50, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22693928

RESUMEN

The purpose of this article is to describe the legal framework for controlling mosquito vectors of diseases transmissible to human beings in certain locations such as Reunion Island. A distinction is made between general legal measures for insect vector control and specific measures for mosquito control. Regionalization is a major factor in the legal framework for insect vector control, thus limiting the scope of action by the prefecture. Another factor involves the increasing role of an important new player, i.e., the regional health agencies. Mosquito vector control raises the need to impose and enforce measures on the general public as well as private citizens. Failure to comply with these measures is punishable by sanctions and fines with no diminishing effect on de jure implementation of control measures by public agencies.


Asunto(s)
Programas Obligatorios/tendencias , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Competencia Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aedes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Aedes/fisiología , Aedes/virología , Infecciones por Alphavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Alphavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Alphavirus/transmisión , Animales , Fiebre Chikungunya , Humanos , Insectos Vectores/crecimiento & desarrollo , Insectos Vectores/fisiología , Insectos Vectores/virología , Programas Obligatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Obligatorios/organización & administración , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/organización & administración , Reunión/epidemiología
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(10): e0008805, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dengue fever is a major public health problem in tropical/subtropical regions. Prior economic analyses have predominantly evaluated either vaccination or vector-control programmes in isolation and do not really consider the incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness of mixed strategies and combination control. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of single and combined approaches in Thailand. METHODS: The impacts of different control interventions were analysed using a previously published mathematical model of dengue epidemiology and control incorporating seasonality, age structure, consecutive infection, cross protection, immune enhancement and combined vector-host transmission. An economic model was applied to simulation results to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 4 interventions and their various combinations (6 strategies): i) routine vaccination of 1-year olds; ii) chemical vector control strategies targeting adult and larval stages separately; iii) environmental management/ public health education and awareness [EM/ PHEA]). Payer and societal perspectives were considered. The health burden of dengue fever was assessed using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost. Costs and effects were assessed for 10 years. Costs were discounted at 3% annually and updated to 2013 United States Dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out after strategies were rank-ordered by cost, with results presented in a table of incremental analysis. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were undertaken; and the impact and cost-effectiveness of Wolbachia was evaluated in exploratory scenario analyses. RESULTS: From the payer and societal perspectives, 2 combination strategies were considered optimal, as all other control strategies were dominated. Vaccination plus adulticide plus EM/ PHEA was deemed cost-effective according to multiple cost-effectiveness criteria. From the societal perspective, incremental differences vs. adulticide and EM/ PHEA resulted in costs of $157.6 million and DALYs lost of 12,599, giving an expected ICER of $12,508 per DALY averted. Exploratory scenario analyses showed Wolbachia to be highly cost-effective ($343 per DALY averted) vs. other single control measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our model shows that individual interventions can be cost-effective, but that important epidemiological reductions and economic impacts are demonstrated when interventions are combined as part of an integrated approach to combating dengue fever. Exploratory scenario analyses demonstrated the potential epidemiological and cost-effective impact of Wolbachia when deployed at scale on a nationwide basis. Our findings were robust in the face of sensitivity analyses.


Asunto(s)
Dengue/economía , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación/economía , Aedes/microbiología , Aedes/fisiología , Aedes/virología , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dengue/epidemiología , Dengue/prevención & control , Dengue/transmisión , Humanos , Mosquitos Vectores/microbiología , Mosquitos Vectores/fisiología , Mosquitos Vectores/virología , Tailandia/epidemiología , Wolbachia/fisiología
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(3): 976-985, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748773

RESUMEN

Gene drive technologies represent powerful tools to develop vector control strategies that will complement the current approaches to mitigate arthropod-borne infectious diseases. The characteristics of gene drive technologies have raised additional concerns to those for standard genetically engineered organisms. This generates a need for adaptive governance that has not been met yet because of the rapid rate of progress in gene drive research. For the eventual release of gene drive insects into wild populations, an international governance network would be helpful in guiding scientists, stakeholders, public opinion, and affected communities in its use. We examined the current institutions and governing bodies among various continents that could have an impact on gene drive governance or the potential to adapt to its future use. Possible governance strategies also are proposed that seek to bridge gaps and promote an ethically sound policy framework. Ideally, governance strategies should be developed before or at the same pace as gene drive research to anticipate field releases and maximize their impact as a public health tool. However, this is not likely to happen as it takes years to develop global accords, and some countries may choose to move ahead independently on the new technology.


Asunto(s)
Culicidae/genética , Tecnología de Genética Dirigida/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cooperación Internacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mosquitos Vectores/genética , Agricultura/ética , Agricultura/métodos , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Investigación Biomédica/ética , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Tecnología de Genética Dirigida/ética , Humanos , Control de Mosquitos/organización & administración , Salud Pública , Carácter Cuantitativo Heredable
8.
Malar J ; 8 Suppl 2: S3, 2009 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19917073

RESUMEN

The global malaria situation, especially in Africa, and the problems frequently encountered in chemical control of vectors such as insecticide resistance, emphasize the urgency of research, development and implementation of new vector control technologies that are applicable at regional and local levels. The successful application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) for the control of the New World screwworm Cochliomyia hominivorax and several species of fruit flies has given impetus to the use of this method for suppression or elimination of malaria vectors in some areas of Africa including Northern State of Sudan. The research and development phase of the Northern State feasibility study has been started. Sudanese stakeholders are working side-by-side with the International Atomic Energy Agency in the activities of this important phase. Several ethical, legal and social issues associated with this approach arose during this phase of the project. They need to be seriously considered and handled with care. In this paper, these issues are described, and the current and proposed activities to overcome potential hurdles to ensure success of the project are listed.


Asunto(s)
Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Salud Pública/ética , Animales , Participación de la Comunidad , Ecosistema , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Malaria/transmisión , Control de Mosquitos/ética , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Dinámica Poblacional , Sudán
10.
Parassitologia ; 50(1-2): 127-8, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18693577

RESUMEN

The Community legislator, through Directives 2004/17/CE and 2004/18/CE, wanted dictate to the Member States some "guidelines" to be used in the field of public procurement of services, in order to promote, through an inner market growth, developing appropriate operational protocols to document in the race; that, has the aim at testify the consolidated technical capacity of Company which conferred the health reclamation provided by the "Plans to put public health emergencies". By its nature, the legislative regulatory act which is capable of directing the gradual harmonization of national laws, giving also each state full autonomy on the form and means to be taken. Therefore, the objectives of the Community directives must be properly incorporated and interpreted, including the legislative adaptation about the regulation of the disinfestations Enterprises.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Insectos Vectores , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Animales , Italia , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/organización & administración , Administración en Salud Pública/educación , Recursos Humanos
11.
Parassitologia ; 50(1-2): 99-101, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18693569

RESUMEN

Following the implementation of the Directive 98/8/CE a few changes in the availability of insecticidal molecules to control Ae. albopictus have been outlined. Available products for larvicidal treatments will predominantly be based upon two growth regulators (diflubenzuron and pyriproxyfen). For the control of the adult forms there will mostly be active ingredients belonging to the pyrethroid group. Importance of surveillance for the onset of tolerance or resistance phenomena.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Insectos Vectores , Insecticidas/provisión & distribución , Control de Mosquitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Aedes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Animales , Bacillus thuringiensis , Diflubenzurón/provisión & distribución , Italia , Larva , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Control Biológico de Vectores/métodos , Control Biológico de Vectores/estadística & datos numéricos , Piretrinas/provisión & distribución , Piridinas/provisión & distribución
13.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 7(1): 103, 2018 Nov 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia is one of the African countries where Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax co-exist. Monitoring and evaluation of current malaria transmission status is an important component of malaria control as it is a measure of the success of ongoing interventions and guides the planning of future control and elimination efforts. MAIN TEXT: We evaluated changes in malaria control policy in Ethiopia, and reviewed dynamics of country-wide confirmed and clinical malaria cases by Plasmodium species and reported deaths for all ages and less than five years from 2001 to 2016. Districts level annual parasite incidence was analysed to characterize the malaria transmission stratification as implemented by the Ministry of Health. We found that Ethiopia has experienced major changes from 2003 to 2005 and subsequent adjustment in malaria diagnosis, treatment and vector control policy. Malaria interventions have been intensified represented by the increased insecticide treated net (ITN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) coverage, improved health services and improved malaria diagnosis. However, countrywide ITN and IRS coverages were low, with 64% ITN coverage in 2016 and IRS coverage of 92.5% in 2016 and only implemented in epidemic-prone areas of > 2500 m elevation. Clinical malaria incidence rate dropped from an average of 43.1 cases per 1000 population annually between 2001 and 2010 to 29.0 cases per 1000 population annually between 2011 and 2016. Malaria deaths decreased from 2.1 deaths per 100 000 people annually between 2001 and 2010 to 1.1 deaths per 100 000 people annually between 2011 to 2016. There was shrinkage in the malaria transmission map and high transmission is limited mainly to the western international border area. Proportion of P. falciparum malaria remained nearly unchanged from 2000 to 2016 indicating further efforts are needed to suppress transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Malaria morbidity and mortality have been significantly reduced in Ethiopia since 2001, however, malaria case incidence is still high, and there were major gaps between ITN ownership and compliance in malarious areas. Additional efforts are needed to target the high transmission area of western Ethiopia to sustain the achievements made to date.


Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Malaria Vivax/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Etiopía/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida , Insecticidas , Estudios Longitudinales , Malaria Falciparum/mortalidad , Malaria Vivax/mortalidad , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium vivax/aislamiento & purificación
14.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 77(6 Suppl): 227-31, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18165497

RESUMEN

Seven years ago, the removal of taxes and tariffs on insecticide treated nets (ITNs) was considered one of the easiest resolutions for most countries to implement among the targets agreed upon at the African Summit on Roll Back Malaria in Abuja, Nigeria, on April 25, 2000. However, seven years later, 24 of the 39 Abuja signatories continue to impose taxes and tariffs on this life-saving tool. Taxes and tariffs significantly increase the price of an insecticide treated net, reduce affordability, and discourage the commercial sector from importing insecticide treated net products. Consequently, Roll Back Malaria partners are engaged in advocacy efforts to remove taxes and tariffs on insecticide treated nets in malaria-endemic countries of Africa. This viewpoint summarizes key obstacles to the removal of taxes and tariffs that have been identified through a review of country situations. To achieve the goal of producing and supplying more than 160 million insecticide treated nets needed to reach the revised Roll Back Malaria Partnership targets by 2010, tax and tariff reforms are urgently needed. Such reforms must be accompanied by country-specific systems to protect the poor (e.g., through voucher systems for vulnerable groups and other forms of targeted subsidies).


Asunto(s)
Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/economía , Insectos Vectores/parasitología , Insecticidas/economía , Control de Mosquitos/economía , Impuestos/economía , Impuestos/legislación & jurisprudencia , África del Sur del Sahara , Animales , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/parasitología , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Insectos , Insecticidas/provisión & distribución , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/métodos
15.
Health Policy ; 83(2-3): 196-212, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17316882

RESUMEN

Mosquito control programs at seven urban sites in Kenya, Egypt, Israel, Costa Rica, and Trinidad are described and compared. Site-specific urban and disease characteristics, organizational diagrams, and strengths, weaknesses, obstacles and threats (SWOT) analysis tools are used to provide a descriptive assessment of each mosquito control program, and provide a comparison of the factors affecting mosquito abatement. The information for SWOT analysis is collected from surveys, focus-group discussions, and personal communication. SWOT analysis identified various issues affecting the efficiency and sustainability of mosquito control operations. The main outcome of our work was the description and comparison of mosquito control operations within the context of each study site's biological, social, political, management, and economic conditions. The issues identified in this study ranged from lack of inter-sector collaboration to operational issues of mosquito control efforts. A lack of sustainable funding for mosquito control was a common problem for most sites. Many unique problems were also identified, which included lack of mosquito surveillance, lack of law enforcement, and negative consequences of human behavior. Identifying common virtues and shortcomings of mosquito control operations is useful in identifying "best practices" for mosquito control operations, thus leading to better control of mosquito biting and mosquito-borne disease transmission.


Asunto(s)
Control de Mosquitos/organización & administración , Salud Urbana , Animales , Costa Rica , Ecosistema , Eficiencia Organizacional , Egipto , Agencias Gubernamentales/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Israel , Kenia , Modelos Organizacionales , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Dinámica Poblacional , Administración en Salud Pública , Trinidad y Tobago
18.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 22(3): 534-7, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17067058

RESUMEN

Source reduction as part of an integrated pest management program is a cornerstone of the American Mosquito Control Association's Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program Strategy Document to reduce pesticide risk. Since the early 1980s, Florida has made important strides in implementing environmentally sound source reduction strategies in salt marshes while managing them for both mosquito control and natural resource enhancement. The political mechanism for this progress has been interagency cooperation through the Florida Coordinating Council on Mosquito Control and its Subcommittee on Managed Marshes. Challenges in accomplishing source reduction continue because both public and private lands are involved. Public lands include those owned by federal (e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service), state (Florida Department of Environmental Protection), and local governments, and they have a diversity of management objectives. This diversity adds to the challenge facing mosquito control agencies in providing mosquito control services while protecting and enhancing the environment.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Control de Mosquitos , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Ambiente , Florida , Insecticidas , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Agua
19.
Health Policy Plan ; 31(1): 91-101, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26082391

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New vector control tools are needed to combat insecticide resistance and reduce malaria transmission. The World Health Organization (WHO) endorses larviciding as a supplementary vector control intervention using larvicides recommended by the WHO Pesticides Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES). The decision to scale-up larviciding in Nigeria provided an opportunity to investigate the factors influencing policy adoption and assess the role that actors and evidence play in the policymaking process, in order to draw lessons that help accelerate the uptake of new methods for vector control. METHODS: A retrospective policy analysis was carried out using in-depth interviews with national level policy stakeholders to establish normative national vector control policy or strategy decision-making processes and compare these with the process that led to the decision to scale-up larviciding. The interviews were transcribed, then coded and analyzed using NVivo10. Data were coded according to pre-defined themes from an analytical policy framework developed a priori. RESULTS: Stakeholders reported that the larviciding decision-making process deviated from the normative vector control decision-making process. National malaria policy is normally strongly influenced by WHO recommendations, but the potential of larviciding to contribute to national economic development objectives through larvicide production in Nigeria was cited as a key factor shaping the decision. The larviciding decision involved a restricted range of policy actors, and notably excluded actors that usually play advisory, consultative and evidence generation roles. Powerful actors limited the access of some actors to the policy processes and content. This may have limited the influence of scientific evidence in this policy decision. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that national vector control policy change can be facilitated by linking malaria control objectives to wider socioeconomic considerations and through engaging powerful policy champions to drive policy change and thereby accelerate access to new vector control tools.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Plaguicidas , Formulación de Políticas , Personal Administrativo/psicología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Nigeria , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 10(5): e0004765, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27227971

RESUMEN

The United States Gulf Coast's current risk to Zika transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes can be traced back to some important federal health policy decisions made during the 1960s.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Control de Mosquitos , Mosquitos Vectores , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Aedes/virología , Animales , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud , Humanos , Control de Mosquitos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mosquitos Vectores/virología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Virus Zika/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA