Pericardial effusion in children at tertiary national referral hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a 7-year institution based review.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion (PE) is a rare yet an important cause of child mortality due to collection of excess fluid in pericardial space. The study aimed to describe the PE profile in the national cardiac referral hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: The study employed cross-sectional study design for a 7-year review of childhood PE in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Descriptive and analytic statistics were applied. RESULTS: There were 17,386 pediatric emergency/ER admissions during the study period, and PE contributed to 0.47% of ER admissions. From 71 included subjects, 59% (42) were males with mean age of 7.8 ± 3.3 years. Cough or shortness of breath,73.2% (52) and fever or fast breathing, 26.7% (19), were the common presenting symptoms. The median duration of an illness before presentation was 14days (IQR: 8-20). The etiologies for pericardial effusion were infective (culture positive-23.9%, culture negative-43.6%, tuberculous-4.2%), hypothyroidism (4.2%), inflammatory (12.7%), malignancy (7%) or secondary to chronic kidney disease (1. 4%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolated bacteria on blood culture, 12.7% (9) while the rest were pseudomonas, 7% (5) and klebsiella, 4.2% (3). Mild, moderate and severe pericardial effusion was documented in 22.5% (16), 46.5% (33), and 31% (22) of study subjects, respectively. Pericardial tamponade was reported in 50.7% (36) of subjects. Pericardial drainage procedure (pericardiocentesis, window or pericardiotomy) was performed for 52.1% (37) PE cases. The case fatality of PE was 12.7% (9). Pericardial drainage procedure was inversely related to mortality, adjusted odds ratio 0.11(0.01-0.99), p 0.049). CONCLUSION: PE contributed to 0.47% of ER admissions. The commonest PE presentation was respiratory symptoms of around two weeks duration. Purulent pericarditis of staphylococcal etiology was the commonest cause of PE and the case fatality rate was 12.7%. Pericardial drainage procedures contributed to reduction in mortality. All PE cases should be assessed for pericardial drainage procedure to avoid mortality.

Descriptions of Etiology, Clinical Course, and Prognosis of Patients Presenting with Pericardial Effusion.

Pericardial effusion (PE) presentation varies from an incidental finding to a life-threatening situation; thus, its etiology and clinical course remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate these factors.We analyzed 171 patients (0.4%) who presented with PE among 34,873 patients who underwent echocardiography between 2011 and 2021 at our hospital. Clinical and prognostic information was retrieved from electronic medical records. The primary endpoints were all-cause death, hospitalization due to heart failure (HF), and other cardiovascular events such as cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, elective percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke.The etiologies of PE were as follows: idiopathic (32%), HF-related (18%), iatrogenic (11%), cardiac surgery-related (10%), radiation therapy-related (9%), malignancy (8%), pericarditis/myocarditis (8%), myocardial infarction-related (2%), and acute aortic dissection (2%). Patients with idiopathic/HF etiology were more likely to be older than the others.During a mean follow-up period of 2.5 years, all-cause death occurred in 21 patients (12.3%), cardiovascular events in 10 patients (5.8%), and hospitalization for HF in 24 patients (14.0%). All-cause death was frequently observed in patients with malignancy (44% per person-year). Cardiovascular events were mostly observed in patients with radiation therapy-related and malignancy (8.6% and 7.3% per person-year, respectively).The annual incidence of hospitalization for HF was the highest in patients with HF-related (25.1% per person-year), followed by radiation therapy-related (10.4% per person-year).This retrospective study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, to reveal the contemporary prevalence of PE, its cause, and outcome in patients who visited a cardiovascular hospital in an urban area of Japan.

Postoperative pericardial effusion, pericardiotomy, and atrial fibrillation: An explanatory analysis of the PALACS trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (PALACS) trial, posterior pericardiotomy was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying this effect. METHODS: We included PALACS patients with available echocardiographic data (n = 387/420, 92%). We tested the hypotheses that the reduction in POAF with the intervention was associated with 1) a reduction in postoperative pericardial effusion and/or 2) an effect on left atrial size and function. Spline and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 307, 79%) had postoperative pericardial effusions (anterior 68%, postero-lateral 51.9%). The incidence of postero-lateral effusion was significantly lower in patients undergoing pericardiotomy (37% vs 67%; P < .001). The median size of anterior effusion was comparable between patients with and without POAF (5.0 [IQR 3.0-7.0] vs 5.0 [IQR 3.0-7.5] mm; P = .42), but there was a nonsignificant trend towards larger postero-lateral effusion in the POAF group (5.0 [IQR 3.0-9.0] vs 4.0 [IQR 3.0-6.4] mm; P = .06). There was a non-linear association between postero-lateral effusion and POAF at a cut-off at 10 mm (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.13, 6.47; P = .03) that was confirmed in multivariable analysis (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.17, 10.58; P = 0.02). Left atrial dimension and function did not change significantly after posterior pericardiotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in postero-lateral pericardial effusion is a plausible mechanism for the effect of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing POAF. Measures to reduce postoperative pericardial effusion are a promising approach to prevent POAF.

Colchicine usage for prevention of post atrial fibrillation ablation pericarditis in patients undergoing high-power short-duration ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with variable incidence (0.88%-10%) of pericarditis manifested as chest pain, possibly more prevalent with the advent of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation. This has led to the widespread use of colchicine in preventative protocols for postablation pericarditis. However, the efficacy of preventative colchicine has not been validated yet. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a routine postoperative colchicine regimen (0.6 mg twice a day for 14 days post-AF ablation) for prevention of postablation pericarditis in patients undergoing HPSD ablation. METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive single-operator HPSD AF ablation procedures at our institution from June 2019 to July 2022. A colchicine protocol was introduced in June 2021 for the prevention of postablation pericarditis. All ablations were performed with 50 watts. Patients were divided into colchicine and noncolchicine groups. We recorded incidence of postablation chest pain, emergency room (ER) visit for chest pain, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, any ER visit, hospitalization, AF recurrence, and cardioversion for AF within the first 30 days following ablation. We also recorded colchicine-related side effects and medication compliance. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-four consecutive HPSD AF ablation patients were screened for the study. After implementing the prespecified exclusion criteria, a total of 205 patients were included in the final analysis, yielding 101 patients in the colchicine group and 104 patients in the noncolchicine group. Both groups were well-matched for demographic and procedural parameters. There was no significant difference in postablation chest pain (9.9% vs. 8.6%, p = .7), pericardial effusion (2.9% vs. 0.9%, p = .1), ER visits (11.9% vs. 12.5%, p = .2), 30-day hospitalization for AF recurrence (0.9% vs. 0.96%, p = .3), and 30-day need for cardioversion for AF (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p = .2). Fifteen (15) patients had severe colchicine-related diarrhea, out of which 12 discontinued it prematurely. There were no major procedural complications in either group. CONCLUSION: In this single-operator retrospective analysis, prophylactic colchicine was not associated with significant reduction in the incidence of postablation chest pain, pericarditis, 30 day hospitalization, ER visits, or AF recurrence or need of cardioversion within first 30 days after HPSD ablation for AF. However, its usage was associated with significant diarrhea. This study concludes no additional advantage of prophylactic use of colchicine after HPSD AF ablation.

Acute Cardiovascular Manifestations in 286 Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated With COVID-19 Infection in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to document cardiovascular clinical findings, cardiac imaging, and laboratory markers in children presenting with the novel multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. METHODS: This real-time internet-based survey has been endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiologists Working Groups for Cardiac Imaging and Cardiovascular Intensive Care. Children 0 to 18 years of age admitted to a hospital between February 1 and June 6, 2020, with a diagnosis of an inflammatory syndrome and acute cardiovascular complications were included. RESULTS: A total of 286 children from 55 centers in 17 European countries were included. The median age was 8.4 years (interquartile range, 3.8-12.4 years) and 67% were boys. The most common cardiovascular complications were shock, cardiac arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, and coronary artery dilatation. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was present in over half of the patients, and a vast majority of children had raised cardiac troponin when checked. The biochemical markers of inflammation were raised in most patients on admission: elevated C-reactive protein, serum ferritin, procalcitonin, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6 level, and D-dimers. There was a statistically significant correlation between degree of elevation in cardiac and biochemical parameters and the need for intensive care support (P<0.05). Polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was positive in 33.6%, whereas immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibodies were positive in 15.7% cases and immunoglobulin G in 43.6% cases, respectively, when checked. One child in the study cohort died. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac involvement is common in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. The majority of children have significantly raised levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, ferritin, D-dimers, and cardiac troponin in addition to high C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels. In comparison with adults with COVID-19, mortality in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 is uncommon despite multisystem involvement, very elevated inflammatory markers, and the need for intensive care support.

Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with extended in-hospital stay and increased adverse outcomes, including death and stroke. Pericardial effusion is common after cardiac surgery and can trigger atrial fibrillation. We tested the hypothesis that posterior left pericardiotomy, a surgical manoeuvre that drains the pericardial space into the left pleural cavity, might reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this adaptive, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing elective interventions on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these, performed by members of the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery from Weill Cornell Medicine at the New York Presbyterian Hospital in New York, NY, USA. Patients were eligible if they had no history of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias or contraindications to the experimental intervention. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score and using a mixed-block randomisation approach (block sizes of 4, 6, and 8), to posterior left pericardiotomy or no intervention. Patients and assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. Patients were followed up until 30 days after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the incidence of atrial fibrillation during postoperative in-hospital stay, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02875405, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 18, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 3601 patients were screened and 420 were included and randomly assigned to the posterior left pericardiotomy group (n=212) or the no intervention group (n=208; ITT population). The median age was 61·0 years (IQR 53·0-70·0), 102 (24%) patients were female, and 318 (76%) were male, with a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2·0 (IQR 1·0-3·0). The two groups were balanced with respect to clinical and surgical characteristics. No patients were lost to follow-up and data completeness was 100%. Three patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group did not receive the intervention. In the ITT population, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (37 [17%] of 212 vs 66 [32%] of 208 [p=0·0007]; odds ratio adjusted for the stratification variable 0·44 [95% CI 0·27-0·70; p=0·0005]). Two (1%) of 209 patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and one (<1%) of 211 in the no intervention group died within 30 days after hospital discharge. The incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion was lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (26 [12%] of 209 vs 45 [21%] of 211; relative risk 0·58 [95% CI 0·37-0·91]). Postoperative major adverse events occurred in six (3%) patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and in four (2%) in the no intervention group. No posterior left pericardiotomy related complications were seen. INTERPRETATION: Posterior left pericardiotomy is highly effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after surgery on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these without additional risk of postoperative complications. FUNDING: None.

The Epidemiology and Outcome of Pericardial Effusion in Hospitalized Children: A National Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of pericardial effusion in hospitalized children and evaluate risk factors associated with the drainage of pericardial effusion and hospital mortality. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of a national pediatric discharge database. RESULTS: We analyzed hospitalized pediatric patients from the neonatal age through 20 years in the Kids' Inpatient Database 2016, extracting the cases of pericardial effusion. Of the 6 266 285 discharged patients recorded, 6417 (0.1%) were diagnosed with pericardial effusion, with the highest prevalence of 2153 patients in teens (13-20 years of age). Pericardial effusion was drained in 792 (12.3%), and the adjusted risk of pericardial drainage was statistically low with rheumatologic diagnosis (OR, 0.485; 95% CI, 0.358-0.657, P < .001). The overall mortality in children with pericardial effusion was 6.8% and 10.9% of those who required pericardial effusion drainage (P < .001). The adjusted risk of mortality was statistically high with solid organ tumor (OR, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.056-2.239, P = .025) and pericardial drainage (OR, 1.430; 95% CI, 1.067-1.915, P = .017) and low in all other age groups compared with neonates, those with cardiac structural diagnosis (OR, 0.322; 95% CI, 0.212-0.489, P < .001), and those with rheumatologic diagnosis (OR, 0.531; 95% CI, 0.334-0.846, P = .008). CONCLUSION: The risk of mortality in hospitalized children with pericardial effusion was higher in younger children with solid organ tumors and those who required pericardial effusion drainage. In contrast, it was lower in older children with cardiac or rheumatologic diagnoses.

Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.

AIMS: There is limited information on what clinical factors are associated with the development of pericardial effusion after leadless pacemaker implantation. We sought to determine predictors of and to develop a risk score for pericardial effusion in patients undergoing Micra leadless pacemaker implantation attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 2817) undergoing implant attempt from the Micra global trials were analysed. Characteristics were compared between patients with and without pericardial effusion (including cardiac perforation and tamponade). A risk score for pericardial effusion was developed from 18 pre-procedural clinical variables using lasso logistic regression. Internal validation and future prediction performance were estimated using bootstrap resampling. The scoring system was also externally validated using data from the Micra Acute Performance European and Middle East (MAP EMEA) registry. There were 32 patients with a pericardial effusion [1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.6%]. Following lasso logistic regression, 11 of 18 variables remained in the model from which point values were assigned. The C-index was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88). Patient risk score profile ranged from -4 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk) with 71.8% patients considered low risk (risk score ≤0), 16.6% considered medium risk (risk score = 1), and 11.7% considered high risk (risk score ≥2) for effusion. The median C-index following bootstrap validation was 0.73 (interquartile range: 0.70-0.75). The C-index based on 9 pericardial effusions from the 928 patients in the MAP EMEA registry was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52-0.83). The pericardial effusion rate increased significantly with additional Micra deployments in medium-risk (P = 0.034) and high-risk (P < 0.001) patients. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of pericardial effusion following Micra implantation attempt is 1.1% and has decreased over time. The risk of pericardial effusion after Micra implant attempt can be predicted using pre-procedural clinical characteristics with reasonable discrimination. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Micra Post-Approval Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02536118), Micra Continued Access Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488681), and Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02004873).

Predictors and clinical significance of pericardial effusions after pediatric heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of pericardial effusions within 6 months after pediatric heart transplantation (HT). METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on all pediatric HT recipients from 2004 to 2018. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with pericardial effusions post-HT, and survival was compared using log-rank test. RESULTS: During the study period, 97 HTs were performed in 93 patients. Fifty patients (52%) had a ≥small pericardial effusion within 6 months, 16 of which were, or became, ≥moderate in size. Pericardial drain was placed in 8 patients. In univariate analysis, larger recipient body surface area (p = .01) and non-congenital heart disease (p = .002) were associated with pericardial effusion development. Donor/recipient size ratios, post-HT hemodynamics, and rejection did not correlate with pericardial effusion development. In multivariable analysis, non-congenital heart disease (adjusted odds ratio 3.3, p = .01) remained independently associated with development of pericardial effusion. There were no significant differences in post-HT survival between patients with and without ≥small (p = .68) or ≥moderate pericardial effusions (p = .40). CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial effusions are common after pediatric HT. Patients with cardiomyopathy, or non-congenital heart disease, were at higher risk for post-HT pericardial effusions. Pericardial effusions increased morbidity but had no effect on mortality in our cohort. The risk factors identified may be used for anticipatory guidance in pediatric HT.

Pericardial Involvement in Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Background and Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 has an extensive tissue tropism due to its ability to attach to the surfaces of cells through different receptors, leading to systemic complications. In this article, we aim to present the prevalence of pericardial effusions in patients with severe COVID-19, to identify the risk factors/predictors for pericardial involvement, and to evaluate its impact on overall mortality. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 100 patients with severe COVID-19 in our observational cohort study and divided them in two groups: Group A (27 patients with pericardial effusion) and Group B (73 patients without pericardial effusion). We recorded demographic and lifestyle parameters, anthropometric parameters, clinical parameters, inflammation markers, respiratory function parameters, complete blood count, coagulation parameters, and biochemical serum parameters. All patients were evaluated by computer tomography scans within 48 h of admission. Results: The median age was 61 years in both groups and the male/female ratio was 3.5 vs. 2.8 in Group A vs. Group B. We identified mild pericardial effusion (3-4 mm) in 62.9% patients and moderate pericardial effusion (5-9 mm) in 37.1% patients, with a median value of 4 [3;6] mm. The patients with pericardial effusion presented with higher percentages of obesity, type-2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and congestive heart failure, without statistical significance. Increased values in cardiac enzymes (myoglobin, CK, CK-MB) and LDH were statistically associated with pericardial effusion. The overall mortality among the participants of the study was 24% (24 patients), 33.3% in Group A and 20.8% in Group B. Conclusions: Pericardial effusion has a high prevalence (27%) among patients with severe forms of COVID-19 and was associated with higher mortality. Pericardial effusion in our study was not associated with the presence of comorbidities or the extent of lung involvement. Overall mortality was 60% higher in patients with pericardial effusion.

The relationship between pericardial effusion and pulmonary involvement, prognosis, mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Aim    Comprehensive studies on the coexistence of COVID-19 and pericardial effusion (PEff) are limited. In this study, we investigated the relationship between pneumonia severity and PEff, predisposing factors, and the effect of PEff on clinical prognosis and mortality in COVID-19 patients.Material and methods    Between March and November 2020, 5 575 patients were followed up in our pandemic hospital due to COVID-19. 3 794 patients with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results and thoraxcomputerized tomography (CT) imaging at admission were included in the study. The clinical and demographic characteristics, CT images, hematological and biochemical parameters of these patients were retrospectively examined. Pulmonary involvement of 3794 patients was divided into three groups and its relationship with PEff was investigated retrospectively.Results    There were 560 patients who did not have pulmonary involvement, 2 639 patients with pulmonary involvement below 50 %, and 595 patients with 50 % or more pulmonary involvement. As pulmonaryinvolvement or the severity of the disease increased, male gender and advanced age become statistically significant. The mean age of patients with PEff was higher, and PEff was more common in males. Patients with PEff had more comorbid diseases and significantly elevated serum cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers. The need for intensive care and mortality rates were higher in these patients. While the in-hospital mortality rate was 56.9 % in patients with PEff and pulmonary involvement above 50 %, in-hospital mortality rate was 34.4 % in patients with pulmonary involvement above 50 % and without PEff (p<0.001).The presence of PEff during admission for COVID-19 disease, the appearance of PEff or increase in the degree of PEff during follow-up were closely related to mortality and prognosis.Conclusion    As the severity of pulmonary involvement or the clinical severity of the disease increased, PEff occurred in patients or the degree of PEff increased. The clinical prognosis of patients presenting with PEff was quite poor, and the frequency of intensive care admissions and mortality were significantly higher. PEff was an important finding in the follow-up and management of patients with COVID-19, and it reflected the clinical prognosis.

Association of thoracic cage fractures and pericardial effusion in blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: Several case reports suggest that penetrating thoracic cage fractures are an important cause for hemopericardium and cardiac tamponade following blunt trauma. However, the prevalence of this mechanism of injury is not fully known, and considering this association may provide a better understanding of the utility of cardiac component of the FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma). OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of thoracic cage fractures and pericardial effusion in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2015-2017) of adults ≥18 years of age whose mechanism of injury was either a fall or motor vehicle accident. Thoracic cage fractures were defined as any rib or sternum fracture. The primary outcome was the presence of pericardial effusion. Confounding variables were accounted for using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 1,673,704 patients in the study; 226,896 (14%) patients had at least one thoracic cage fracture. A pericardial effusion was present in 4923 (0.3%) patients. When a thoracic cage fracture was present, the odds of having a pericardial effusion was significantly higher (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 6.5 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]). Patients with left and right-sided rib fractures had similar odds of a pericardial effusion (aOR 1.2 [95% CI 1.04-1.4]). Sternal fractures carried the highest odds of having a pericardial effusion (aOR 11.1 [9.9-12.3]). CONCLUSION: Thoracic cage fractures secondary to blunt trauma represent a significant independent risk factor for the development of a pericardial effusion. Our findings lend support for the mechanism of bony injuries causing penetrating cardiac trauma. Given these findings, and the fact that many thoracic cage fractures are detected after the initial evaluation, we support maintaining the cardiac view in the FAST examination for all blunt trauma patients.

Echocardiographic Screening for Postoperative Pericardial Effusion in Children.

Pericardial effusion (PE) after cardiac surgery can be life threatening without timely detection, and the optimal screening method is unknown. We sought to evaluate the role of a surveillance echocardiogram on postoperative day 10 (± 2), determine the incidence of postoperative PE, and identify risk factors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all pediatric patients who underwent open heart surgery at a single institution over a 7-month period. To identify risk factors for PE, medical records of patients with PE detected within 6 weeks after surgery (cases) were compared with patients without PE (controls). Of 203 patients, 52 (26%) had PE within 6 weeks; 42 (81%) were trivial-small and 10 (19%) were moderate-large. Twenty-nine (56%) were first detected within 7 days post-operatively, including all cases developing cardiac tamponade (n = 3). An echocardiogram was done 10 (± 2) days post-operatively in 41/52 cases, of which 12/41 (29%) did not have a PE at this time, 24/41 (59%) had a trivial-small PE, and 5/41(12%) had a moderate-large PE; 2 of the latter had no prior detected PE. Closure of an atrial septal defect had the highest incidence of PE (42%). PE cases were associated with postoperative nasopharyngeal detection of a respiratory virus (OR 3.8, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the majority of PE cases were detected within 7 days post-operatively, including all cases subsequently developing cardiac tamponade. Day 10 echocardiography infrequently detected a moderate or large effusion that had previously gone undiagnosed. A positive perioperative nasopharyngeal aspirate for a respiratory virus was associated with postoperative PE.

Preoperative Pericardial Effusion is Associated with Low Cardiac Output Syndrome After Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Low cardiac output syndrome is the main cause of death after pericardiectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis from January 2009 to October 2020 at our hospital were included in the study. Histopathologic studies of pericardium tissue from every patient were performed. All survivors were followed up. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive patients underdoing pericardiectomy were included in the study. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome was 10.7% (10/92). There were five operative deaths. Mortality and incidence of LCOS in the group with pericardial effusion were significantly higher than those in the group without pericardial effusion. Tuberculosis of the pericardium (60/92, 65.2%) was the most common histopathologic finding in this study. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that preoperative pericardial effusion is associated with increased rate of low cardiac output syndrome. Eighty-five survivors were in NYHA class I (85/87, 97.7%), and two were in class II (2/87, 2.3%) at the latest follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pericardial effusion is associated with low cardiac output syndrome after pericardiectomy. Tuberculosis of the pericardium was the most common histopathologic finding in this study. For constrictive pericarditis caused by tuberculous bacteria, systematic antituberculosis drugs should be given. Preoperative pericardial effusion is associated with increased rate of low cardiac output syndrome. Perfect preoperative preparation is very important to reduce the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome and mortality. It is very important to use a large dose of diuretics with cardiotonic or vasopressor in a short time after the operation.

Clinico-Etiological Profile of Children with Pericardial Effusion in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.

INTRODUCTION: Pericardial effusion may be due to various causes. With the changing scenario of newer generation antibiotics and robust immunization program our aim is to identify the change, if any, in etiology and disease menifestations. METHODOLOGY: This is a hospital-based uni-center prospective study with a population of 30 children for a period of 1½ year. Clinico-epidemiological features, investigations, complications and short-term outcome were assessed. RESULTS: We found 13 (43.33%) patients having mild, 11 (36.67%) had moderate and 6 (20%) had severe pericardial effusion. Cardiac tamponade was present in six cases. Among the study population 9 (30%) patients were diagnosed as having pyogenic pericardial effusion and 8 (26.67%) had tubercular effusion. The predominant symptoms of pericardial effusion in our children were fever and tachycardia (83.33%).Other symptoms at presentation were tachycardia (76.67%), cough (63.33%), chest pain (50%), orthopnea (43.33%) and skin rash (16.67%). Pericardiocentesis was done in 14 cases (46.67%) of which 4 patients (13.33%) required pig tail catheterization. DISCUSSION: Infectious etiology still remains the primary cause of pericardial effusion in our country. The presenting clinical signs are very much nonspecific and also not so prominent unless hemodynamic compromisation occurs. CONCLUSION: This study showed that bacterial and tubercular pericardial effusions are still two most prevalent etiological diagnosis in this part of country. Early diagnosis and treatment has good outcome.

A comparative study of pericardial effusion and pleural effusion after cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence and clinical outcome of pericardial and pleural effusion after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been fully investigated. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with paroxysmal AF were treated with either CBA (n = 30) or RFCA (n = 30) groups, with assessment of serum troponin I level, left atrial pulmonary vein computed tomography (CT) angiography and echocardiography within 24 hours before ablation, and serum troponin I level at 12 hours, and chest CT and echocardiography within 24 hours postablation. Repeat chest CT was performed 1 month after the index procedure in patients with pericardial or pleural effusion. RESULTS: With similarly distributed baseline characteristics, the CBA group relative to the RFCA group had postablation: higher serum troponin I level (13.48 vs 1.84 µg/L, P < .001); similarly high pericardial effusion rates on chest CT (80% vs 93.3%, P > .05), with chest CT yielding significantly higher detection rate than echocardiography; similarly high pleural effusion rates on chest CT (73.3% vs 80%, P > .05); and smaller maximum depths on chest CT cross-section of pericardial effusion (5.21 ± 3.37 vs 7.13 ± 2.68 mm, P < .05) and pleural effusion bilaterally (left: 4.16 ± 4.90 vs 6.96 ± 5.42 mm; right: 5.04 ± 4.46 vs 7.55 ± 4.95 mm, both P < .05). The effusions self-resolved within a mean period of 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: Both CBA and RFCA were associated with high rates of pericardial and pleural effusion, with RFCA yielding numerically higher incidence and significantly higher effusion extent, and chest CT significantly higher detection rates than echocardiography.

Clinical observation of noncoronary cardiac abnormalities in Chinese children with Kawasaki disease.

BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute, self-limited vasculitis. Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) serves as a major contributor to the long-term prognosis of KD. In addition, acute KD usually also leads to several kinds of noncoronary cardiac abnormalities (NCA) involving the pericardium, myocardium and endocardium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 142 Chinese children with KD were recruited from July 2015 to April 2018. Blood samples were collected at 24 hours pre-intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. Several inflammatory mediators and biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction were detected. Echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG) were performed. RESULTS: Plasma white blood cell counts (WBC) were significantly increased in patients with IVIG-nonresponsive KD when compared with their IVIG-responsive counterparts. A total of 106 children (74.65%) suffered from NCA, including 8 patients (5.63%) with pericardial effusion, 23 patients (16.20%) with acute myocarditis, 101 patients (71.13%) with valvular regurgitation and 8 patients (5.63%) with abnormal ECG. No significant differences were observed in the distribution of clinical classification and the response to IVIG therapy regardless of NCA exhibited or not. CONCLUSIONS: Noncoronary cardiac abnormalities is almost universal in acute KD and mainly manifests as valvular regurgitation. However, it has no influence on clinical classification and the response to IVIG therapy.

Pericardial effusion following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

PCE is a complication of HSCT that has previously been described in small single-center studies. This study aimed to assess the frequency of, risk factors for, and outcomes of children with a PCE following HSCT across a large multi-center cohort. All patients ≤21 years undergoing first HSCT (1/2005-9/2015) were identified from the Pediatric Health Information System. ICD-9 codes were used to identify patients with a PCE during or following the transplant encounter. Multivariable modeling assessed risk factors for developing a PCE and assessed the impact of PCE on patient outcome. Of 10 455 included patients, 739 (7.1%) developed a PCE (median 69 days post-HSCT, interquartile range 33-165 days). PCE developed more commonly in allogeneic vs autologous HSCT recipients (9.1% vs 2.9%, P < .001). Among allogeneic HSCT recipients, independent risk factors for PCE included thrombotic microangiopathy (AHR 2.94, 95% CI 2.16-4.00), heart failure (AHR 2.07, 95% CI 1.61-2.66), PCE pre-HSCT (AHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.19-3.09), arrhythmia (AHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.44-2.16), graft-versus-host disease (AHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.62), female sex (AHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.52), and malignancy (AHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.60). Allogeneic HSCT patients with PCE demonstrated worse survival than those without PCE (5-year survival 50.8% vs 76.9%, P < .001). PCE was independently associated with mortality (AHR 1.96, 95% CI 1.62-2.37) following allogeneic HSCT and was not impacted by pericardial intervention. PCE occurs more commonly in patients following allogeneic (vs autologous) HSCT and is associated with inferior outcomes.

Effects of Systemic Steroid Administration on Recurrence of Pericardial Effusion in Pediatric Patients After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Although rare in the general pediatric population, the incidence of pericardial effusion is significantly higher in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) with a reported incidence of up to 16.9%. The development of pericardial effusion in this setting is associated with higher mortality. Although pericardiocentesis is a relatively safe procedure for treating pericardial effusion, it is invasive, painful, and exposes an immunosuppressed patient to the risks of infection, bleeding, and injury to surrounding structures. Given the procedural risks of pericardiocentesis, systemic steroids are often administered for the treatment of pericardial effusion given their use for pericarditis in the general population. However, the effectiveness of systemic steroids for the treatment of pericardial effusion in the pediatric HCT population has not been confirmed. We studied the role of systemic steroids, administered at the time of initial pericardiocentesis performed for pericardial effusion, in preventing repeat pericardiocentesis. A total of 37 pericardiocenteses after HCT were performed during the study period with 25 patients undergoing first-time pericardiocentesis and 15 of those patients receiving systemic steroids. Eight patients required repeat pericardiocentesis; 5 of 15 (33%) received steroids and 3 of 10 (30%) did not receive steroids. Our data in this small cohort of pediatric HCT patients did not show a significant difference in the need for repeat pericardiocentesis with the use of systemic steroids, initiated within 48 hours of pericardiocentesis.

Pericardial complications and postcardiac injury syndrome after cardiovascular implantable electronic device placement : A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Postcardiac injury syndrome (PCIS) is an emerging condition including pericarditis with or without pericardial effusion after an injury to cardiac tissue. Data are lacking on its incidence and clinical predictors after cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) placement. We therefore performed this meta-analysis to determine the incidence of PCIS. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines from February 2007 to February 2017 for studies evaluating pericardial complications subsequent to CIED implantation. Primary outcome was the total number of cases of pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade documented. RESULTS: Of 2931 references, 22 articles (enrolling 188,944 patients) were included. Pooled estimates from random-effects analysis showed an overall incidence of 5.82 per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.33-8.17) at 30 days, and 1.60 per 1000 (95% CI: 0.13-3.07) at 1 year. Advanced age and prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were associated with increased rates of pericardial complications. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that CIED implantations are associated with a low incidence (0.6%) of pericardial complications at 30 days. Patients with advanced age and prior CABG are high-risk patients for pericardial complications.