RESUMEN
A high-resolution, rapid, and economical hydrodynamic chromatographic (HDC) method for large DNA separations in free solution was developed using narrow (5 µm diameter), bare open capillaries. Size-based separation was achieved in a chromatographic format with larger DNA molecules being eluting faster than smaller ones. Lambda DNA Mono Cut Mix was baseline-separated with the percentage resolutions generally less than 9.0% for all DNA fragments (1.5 to 48.5 kbp) tested in this work. High efficiencies were achieved for large DNA from this chromatographic technique, and the number of theoretical plates reached 3.6 × 10(5) plates for the longest (48.5 kbp) and 3.7 × 10(5) plates for the shortest (1.5 kbp) fragments. HDC parameters and performances were also discussed. The method was further applied for fractionating large DNA fragments from real-world samples (SacII digested Arabidopsis plant bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) DNA and PmeI digested Rice BAC DNA) to demonstrate its feasibility for BAC DNA finger printing. Rapid separation of PmeI digested Rice BAC DNA covering from 0.44 to 119.041 kbp was achieved in less than 26 min. All DNA fragments of these samples were baseline separated in narrow bare open capillaries, while the smallest fragment (0.44 kbp) was missing in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) separation mode. It is demonstrated that narrow bare open capillary chromatography can realize a rapid separation for a wide size range of DNA mixtures that contain both small and large DNA fragments in a single run.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis/análisis , ADN de Plantas/análisis , Electroforesis Capilar/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Hidrodinámica , Electroforesis Capilar/normas , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus, GAS) is a human pathogen that causes diseases of various intensity, from mild strep throat to life threatening invasive infections and postinfectional sequelae. S. pyogenes encodes multiple, often phage encoded, virulence factors and their presence is related to severity of the disease. Acquisition of mobile genetic elements, carrying virulence factors, as phages or ICEs (integrative and cojugative elements) has been shown previously to promote selection of virulent clones. We designed the system of eight low volume multi- and one singleplex PCR reactions to detect genes encoding twenty virulence factors (spd3, sdc, sdaB, sdaD, speB, spyCEP, scpA, mac, sic, speL, K, M, C, I, A, H, G, J, smeZ and ssa) and twenty one phage and ICE integration sites described so far for S. pyogenes. Classification of strains based on the phage and virulence factors absence or presence, correlates with PFGE MLST and emm typing results. We developed a novel, fast and cost effective system that can be used to detect GAS virulence factors. Moreover, this system may become an alternative and effective system to differentiate between GAS strains.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos/aislamiento & purificación , Conjugación Genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Streptococcus pyogenes/genética , Streptococcus pyogenes/virología , Factores de Virulencia/genética , Integración Viral , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , HumanosRESUMEN
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most common genotyping method used for the typing of a number of bacterial species. Generally, investigators use their own custom-developed protocol, but a standardized PFGE protocol would allow the comparison of typing results between laboratories and the tracing of strains around the country. In the present study, we optimized a PFGE protocol for subtyping of Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., which are commonly isolated from nosocomial infections in many hospitals. Reproducibility of our PFGE procedure was studied three times at 2- to 3-week intervals. Epidemiological concordance of the optimized PFGE procedure was tested on seven isolates of A. baumannii from a previous outbreak and seven A. baumannii isolates randomly selected among the clinical isolates. The optimized PFGE procedure was evaluated on a total of 174 clinical isolates including 62 A. baumannii, 50 E. coli, and 62 Klebsiella spp. The inter-laboratory reproducibility of the optimized protocol was tested at four laboratories. The optimized procedure is completed in 28 h after culturing. It is likely to be cost-effective, due to the reduction in the time, reagent volume and enzyme concentration needed. The procedure showed high concordance with epidemiological data. There were no non-typeable isolates among the tested bacteria. It is reproducible and versatile. This protocol can be used to identify outbreaks and monitor the spreading rate of nosocomial infections caused by the tested bacterial isolates. Furthermore, due to its high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, the protocol has the potential to be useful for comparing PFGE fingerprinting profiles of the isolates from different settings.
Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/clasificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Escherichia coli/clasificación , Klebsiella/clasificación , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Animales , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/economía , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/normas , Análisis por Conglomerados , Dermatoglifia del ADN/economía , Dermatoglifia del ADN/normas , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Escherichia coli/genética , Genotipo , Klebsiella/genética , Epidemiología Molecular/economía , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Epidemiología Molecular/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the restriction enzymes with rare-cutting sites in the genome of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis. The evaluation indicated that PFGE with both NotI and SfiI was discriminatory, but NotI was more cost-effective. Based on the results of this study, we suggest using NotI and SfiI as the 1st and the 2nd restriction enzyme for standardizing the PulseNet PFGE protocol for molecular subtyping and global surveillance of V. parahaemolyticus.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Enzimas de Restricción del ADN , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/clasificación , Enzimas de Restricción del ADN/economía , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Genotipo , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/genéticaRESUMEN
In order to assess whether multiple-locus-variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) could replace pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for genotyping vancomycin-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecium (VREF), this study compared the typeability, discriminatory power, concordance and costs of these methods for VREF isolates obtained from patients, environmental samples and the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) where VREF was endemic. Over a 58-day period, 393 VREF isolates (373 vanA, one vanA/B, 19 vanB) were cultured from patient rectal swabs (n = 76), the environment (n = 270) and the hands of HCWs (n = 47). PFGE was able to divide 358 (91.1%) isolates into 19 PFGE types (>six bands different) and 24 subtypes (one to three bands different). MLVA was able to type 391 (99.5%) isolates into 11 genotypes. The discriminatory power of PFGE subtypes was 83%, as compared to 68% for MLVA. Concordance between the two methods, based on matched or mismatched MLVA types and PFGE types or subtypes, was 67.5% and 82.8%, respectively. Using PFGE, 13 isolates could be genotyped in 3 days; MLVA genotyped 94 isolates in 2 days. For both methods, the estimated costs were Euro 7 ($10)/isolate. PFGE and MLVA produced highly concordant results when assigning genotypes to nosocomial VREF isolates. MLVA was faster, but PFGE subtyping was more discriminatory.
Asunto(s)
Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Enfermedades Endémicas , Enterococcus faecium/clasificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Repeticiones de Minisatélite/genética , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/economía , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Ambiente , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Factores de Tiempo , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/genéticaRESUMEN
For the first time, this study evaluated the use of MALDI-TOF as a typing tool for Arcobacter butzleri. A total of 104 A. butzleri strains isolated from different sources in an artisanal dairy plant in Italy were identified and typed using MALDI-TOF and compared with their multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles found in previous studies. MALDI-TOF correctly identified all the isolates to species level. No clearly delineated clusters appeared on dendrograms based on either the complete spectra or the significant peaks, but nine clusters were defined using the cophenetic correlation. Interestingly, MALDI-TOF proved able to discriminate A. butzleri strains below species level, confirming its potential use for epidemiological surveys. As expected, the comparative analysis with PFGE and MLST showed that the discriminatory index was lower for MALDI-TOF but roughly comparable to sequence types and pulsotypes. MALDI-TOF appears to be a relatively low cost answer to the urgent need for more rapid, less expensive typing tools suitable for source attribution studies, readily allowing multiple typing methods to be combined. This study provides insights into MALDI-TOF as potential epidemiological tool. Its application in healthcare surveillance systems awaits further exploration to encourage interaction and convergence studies between primary care in humans and animal and food veterinary authorities as part of the One Health concept.
Asunto(s)
Arcobacter/clasificación , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Leche/microbiología , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus/métodos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/métodos , Animales , Arcobacter/genética , Arcobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Bovinos , Industria Lechera , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Humanos , Italia , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/economíaRESUMEN
We examined the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to predict serotype for Salmonella isolates. Between 2012 and 2014 we assessed 4481 isolates, resulting in >90% assigned serotypes. PFGE is efficient for determining serotype in the majority of cases and results in expedited serotype determination, as well as cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Salmonella/clasificación , Salmonella/genética , Serotipificación/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Group A streptococci (GAS) is responsible of several human diseases ranging from mild infection to severe invasive toxin-mediated disease and post-infectious sequelae. Accordingly, a GAS surveillance program based on molecular techniques is advisable for its epidemiological control. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the gold standard for GAS molecular subtyping, but a major disadvantage is the length of the procedure, which takes 1-3 days of work, minimum. The aim of this study was to develop a rapid and cost-effective procedure for PFGE subtyping of GAS isolates. METHODOLOGY: Different incubation times of GAS, immobilized in agarose miniplugs, in solutions containing lysozyme and/or mutanolysine followed by solutions with urea instead of proteinase K, were assayed. DNA was restricted with SmaI and the fingerprints were obtained in clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) chambers and minichambers. The modified procedure was used to subtype 22 GAS isolates. RESULTS: Intact DNA molecules of GAS immobilized in agarose miniplugs were prepared incubating the cells, in situ, with a solution containing lysozyme for 4 hours, followed by the incubation in a non-enzymatic solution with urea for 2 hours. SmaIDNA macrorestriction fragments were well resolved in 5 hours and 14 minutes by electrophoresis in a CHEF minichamber at 10 V/cm. This procedure for GAS DNA preparation was useful for fingerprinting GAS strains in the format of CHEF Mapper (BioRad). CONCLUSIONS: The procedure took 13 hours for GAS strains subtyping. Both sample preparation and electrophoresis in CHEF minichamber represent an economic alternative for performing massive epidemiological studies of this human pathogen.
Asunto(s)
ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Ácidos Nucleicos Inmovilizados/genética , Tipificación Molecular/economía , Tipificación Molecular/métodos , Streptococcus pyogenes/clasificación , Costos y Análisis de Costo , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Ácidos Nucleicos Inmovilizados/aislamiento & purificación , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Streptococcus pyogenes/genética , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe a laboratory-based technique to track nursing home infections. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: A 721-bed skilled care facility with 14 nursing units. PARTICIPANTS: Residents in a nursing home, average age 76+/-10, 78% male. MEASUREMENTS: Bacterial isolates were listed for each nursing unit. Clusters of identical species and antibiotic susceptibility were identified followed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). If the genetic analysis yielded related strains, the director of nursing performed a clinical investigation. PFGE is available through reference laboratories at a cost of approximately 75 dollars/isolate. RESULTS: Twenty-four clinical clusters of phenotypically identical bacteria (species, antibiotic susceptibility) were identified. Fourteen included genetically related isolates. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of the phenotypically identical clusters contained genetically related isolates. The identification of genetically related bacterial isolates on nursing units by PFGE provides staff with a specific circumstance to review secretion precautions. Genetic analysis may also demonstrate that apparent clusters are unrelated.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Bacterias/genética , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Specimens for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are formed using a plug mold. We report a technique which uses a disposable polyethylene pipette to prepare our specimen plug. We also report a convenient technique to handle portions of the plug used for the typical PFGE manipulations.
Asunto(s)
ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/instrumentación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , PlásticosRESUMEN
Plasmid profile analysis (PPA), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are the three most valuable epidemiological tools for genotyping of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. Aim of this study was to evaluate these three methods in respect to their cost, reproducibility, and discriminatory power. Eighty one nosocomial MRSA isolates with unknown genetic and epidemiological relatedness from Training Hospital of Gulhane Military Medical School, were genotyped by PPA, RAPD, and PFGE methods. All isolates (100%) were typed by RAPD and PFGE, however, eight (9.9%) isolates could not be typed by PPA since they lacked plasmid DNA. Reproducibilities of all the three methods were found to be 100 percent. Discriminatory powers of PPA, RAPD and PFGE methods were calculated as 48.6%, 61.1% and 80.1%, respectively. In conclusion, out of the three methods tested, PFGE allowed the most effective discrimination of MRSA strains. However, PFGE was more time consuming and technically demanding, and required use of specialized and expensive equipment. Although PPA and RAPD were less discriminatory than PFGE, these methods were technically simple, rapid and cheaper. When PPA and RAPD were used in combination, they had equal discriminatory power to PFGE. Thus, it should be emphasized that PPA and RAPD methods could be preferred for initial screening purposes while PFGE should be used as a confirmatory test in genotyping of MRSA isolates.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Plásmidos/análisis , Técnica del ADN Polimorfo Amplificado Aleatorio/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Genotipo , Humanos , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Técnica del ADN Polimorfo Amplificado Aleatorio/economía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Mapeo Restrictivo , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We developed a time-saving and cost-efficient Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) method for the typing of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia by modifying the conventional procedures. Our modifications related to the cell suspension preparation, lysis of bacterial cells in plugs, washing steps, and consumption of restriction enzyme. Although few rapid PFGE protocols on Gram-negative bacteria are available, the use of comparatively large amounts of costly reagents prompted us to look for other alternative. Hence, by considering the speed, simplicity, and relatively low cost, the modified protocol may be of more practical value than other established protocols in investigating S. maltophilia nosocomial outbreaks.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Humanos , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/clasificación , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interlaboratory comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns is difficult. A key reference of standardized PFGE protocol for Acinetobacter baumannii may address this issue. This study aimed to determine restriction enzymes with rare cutting sites on A baumannii genomes and evaluate their cost-effectiveness, discriminatory power, and interlaboratory consistence of band assignments. METHODS: There were 42 A baumannii isolates collected, including nine from three hospital outbreaks and 33 sporadic isolates. The numbers of cutting sites for the restriction enzymes were explored using the "Restriction Digest and PFGE" program. The cost-effectiveness for PFGE analysis was evaluated for the tested restriction enzymes, while its discriminatory ability was expressed through a discriminatory index and 95% confidence interval. The interlaboratory consistence of band assignments was evaluated for the 42 A baumannii isolates. RESULTS: ApaI was the most cost-effective restriction enzyme for a PFGE protocol for A baumannii. Both AscI and AsiSI were reasonable in terms of costs. ApaI, AscI, and AsiSI exhibited similar discriminatory indices. ApaI generated more than 40 fragments that were close and not easy to resolve, resulting in less consistence of band assignments. AscI and AsiSI generated 10-20 fragments that were clearly resolved, resulting in higher consistence of band assignments. AscI exhibited a close discriminatory power to that of AsiSI and at half of the cost of AsiSI for PFGE analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend AscI as the primary enzyme and AsiSI as the secondary enzyme for standardizing the PFGE protocol and interlaboratory comparisons of A baumannii.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/clasificación , Enzimas de Restricción del ADN , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/normas , Tipificación Molecular/métodos , Tipificación Molecular/normas , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Humanos , Tipificación Molecular/economía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Automated repetitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (DiversiLab, bioMérieux, St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada) and single locus sequence typing of the Staphylococcus protein A (spa) gene with spa-type assignment by StaphType RIDOM software were compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as the "gold standard" method for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) typing. Fifty-four MRSA isolates were typed by all methods: 10 of known PFGE CMRSA type and 44 clinical isolates. Correct assignment of CMRSA type or cluster occurred for 47 of 54 (87%) of the isolates when using a rep-PCR similarity index (SI) of ≥95%. Rep-PCR gave 7 discordant results [CMRSA1 (3), CMRSA2 (1), CMRSA4 (1), and CMRSA10 (2)], and some CMRSA clusters were not distinguished (CMRSA10/5/9, CMRSA 7/8, and CMRSA3/6). Several spa types occurred within a single PFGE or repetitive PCR types among the 19 different spa types found. spa type t037 was shared by CMRSA3 and CMRSA6 strains, and CMRSA9 and most CMRSA10 strains shared spa type t008. Time to results for PFGE, repetitive PCR, and spa typing was 3-4 days, 24 h, and 48 h, respectively. The annual costs of using spa or repetitive PCR were 2.4× and 1.9× higher, respectively, than PFGE but routine use of spa typing would lower annual labor costs by 0.10 full-time equivalents compared to PFGE. Repetitive PCR is a good method for rapid outbreak screening, but MRSA isolates that share the same repetitive PCR or PFGE patterns can be distinguished by spa typing.
Asunto(s)
Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Tipificación Molecular/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Genotipo , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular/economía , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Tipificación Molecular/economía , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , Secuencias Repetitivas de Ácidos Nucleicos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
A modified pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocol was developed and applied to clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci to reduce the cost of using lysostaphin. This protocol reduces the expenses of PFGE typing of S. aureus and enterococci as it removes the use of lysostaphin during the spheroplast formation from these bacteria.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Enterococcus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/economía , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Enterococcus/clasificación , Humanos , Lisostafina/economía , Lisostafina/metabolismo , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificaciónRESUMEN
Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the gold standard of molecular typing methods, has a major disadvantage of an unusually long electrophoretic time. From the original protocol of 6 days, it was modified to 3 days and subsequently to a single day. We describe the procedure of stacking five to six gels one on top of another in order to increase and maximize the output in a shorter time without compromising the resolution and reproducibility. All the variables that affect pulsed field gels during electrophoresis were taken into consideration. We firstly optimized the parameters to be used and secondly determined whether stacking of five to six gels had any effect on the molecular separation during electrophoresis in comparison with a single gel run. DNA preparation, restriction, electrophoresis, staining and gel documentation was carried out based on previously published methods. Gels were analysed using BioNumerics and dice coefficient and unweighted pair group methods were used to generate dendrograms based on 1.5% tolerance values. Identical band profiles and band resolution-separation were seen in the PFGE patterns with single gel and multiple stacking gels. Cluster analysis further strengthened the fact that results from stacking gels were reproducible and comparable with a single gel run. This method of stacking gels saves time and maximizes the output at the same time. The run time for a single gel was about 28 hours, but with six stacked gels the run time was 54 hours compared with 28 x 6 = 168 hours if they were run separately as single gels thus saving time of 67.86%. Beside the big factor of saving time, stacking gels save resources (electricity, reagents, water, chemicals and working time) by increasing the sample throughput in a shorter time without compromising on quality of data. But optimization of working parameters is vital depending on the PFGE system used.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/economía , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial resistance, to evaluate and compare the use of two genotyping methods for molecular epidemiology purposes, and to determine the genotypic diversity of Campylobacter coli of porcine origin. A total of 100 C. coli isolates from swine were tested for susceptibility to six antimicrobials using the agar dilution method and genotyped using two high-resolution fingerprinting approaches: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Evaluation of the methods was based on their resistance patterns, discriminatory indexes (DI), high test throughputs, costs, and turnaround times. Resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline was the most common. Both genotypic methods were found to have high discriminatory power, although MLST had a higher DI (0.936) than PFGE (DI = 0.889). It also had a higher throughput than PFGE. Isolates were clustered into 27 groups by MLST compared to 11 by PFGE. MLST was able to further discriminate the isolates grouped under the same cluster by PFGE. Out of the 65 MLST sequence types (STs) identified among the total isolates, 50 were reported for the first time. Most STs were found to be specific to the farm (n = 38) and to slaughter (n = 22). Resistance against tetracycline and erythromycin was encoded by the tet(O) gene and a A2075G point mutation in the 23S rRNA gene, respectively. A high ciprofloxacin MIC (>64 microg/liter) was conferred by a point mutation in the gyrA gene. The weak clonal structure of the C. coli population among swine was further highlighted by the index of association value of 0.293. The findings of this study indicate that multidrug-resistant diverse C. coli strains exhibiting resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are concerning, since these are the drugs of choice for treating invasive campylobacteriosis cases in humans.