Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 161
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 52(7): 1054-1064, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537225

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022. PATIENTS: Patients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents). CONCLUSIONS: Enteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Hipofosfatemia , Fosfatos , Humanos , Hipofosfatemia/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Fosfatos/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Nutrición Enteral/economía , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fluidoterapia/economía , Adulto , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
2.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(5): 105705, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711759

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of hydration with or without Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) 130/0.4 on neurological outcomes and medical costs during hospitalisation in patients with a single infarction (SI) in the posterior lenticulostriate artery (LSA) territory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre, non-blinded cohort study, SI in the posterior LSA was defined as an ischaemic lesion with a high-signal intensity area ≥20 mm. All patients received basic stroke care within 48 h of symptom onset between April 2015 and January 2019. Patients were divided into the following two groups by clinician's preference: 1) those administered HES 130/0.4 and 2) those receiving other infusion fluid. The relationships between hospital costs and hydration therapy type were examined. RESULTS: Eighteen (31%) of 58 patients received HES 130/0.4. The HES group had a significantly lower total cost than the control group (3.6 vs. 6.4 million yen, p=0.006). Moreover, the HES group had a significantly shorter hospital stay duration (79.5 vs. 141.0 days) and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on day 7. Multivariate analysis found that HES 130/0.4 administration was an independent factor associated with high costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hydration therapy with HES 130/0.4 significantly decreased the total costs and hospitalisation duration of patients with SI in the posterior LSA territory.


Asunto(s)
Infarto Encefálico/economía , Infarto Encefálico/terapia , Fluidoterapia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Derivados de Hidroxietil Almidón/economía , Derivados de Hidroxietil Almidón/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Sustitutos del Plasma/economía , Sustitutos del Plasma/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Infarto Encefálico/diagnóstico , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Almidón/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sustitutos del Plasma/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Aust Crit Care ; 34(1): 23-32, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Fluid resuscitation is a ubiquitous intervention in the management of patients treated in the intensive care unit, which has implications for intensive care unit resourcing and budgets. Our objective was to calculate the relative cost of resuscitation fluids in several countries to inform future economic evaluations. METHODS: We collected site-level data regarding the availability and cost of fluids as part of an international survey. We normalised costs to net present values using purchasing power parities and published inflation figures. Costs were also adjusted for equi-effective dosing based on intravascular volume expansion effectiveness and expressed as US dollars (USD) per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 187 sites had access to cost data. Between countries, there was an approximate six fold variation in the cost of crystalloids and colloids overall. The average cost for crystalloids overall was less than 1 USD per 100 mL. In contrast, colloid fluids had higher average costs (59 USD per 100 mL). After adjusting for equi-effective dosing, saline was ∼27 times less costly than albumin (saline: 0.6 USD per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent; albumin 4-5%: 16.4 USD; albumin 20-25%: 15.8 USD) and ∼4 times less costly than hydroxyethyl starch solution (saline: 0.6 USD; hydroxyethyl starch solution: 2.5 USD). Buffered salt solutions, such as compound sodium acetate solutions (e.g., Plasmalyte®), had the highest average cost of crystalloid fluids, costing between 3 and 4 USD per 100 mL. CONCLUSION: The cost of fluid varies substantially between fluid types and between countries, although normal (0.9%) saline is consistently less costly than colloid preparations and some buffered salt solutions. These data can be used to inform future economic evaluations of fluid preparations.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/economía , Sustitutos del Plasma , Soluciones para Rehidratación , Soluciones Cristaloides/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Soluciones Isotónicas/economía , Sustitutos del Plasma/economía , Sustitutos del Plasma/uso terapéutico , Soluciones para Rehidratación/economía , Resucitación
4.
Eur Radiol ; 30(7): 4005-4013, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines on safe use of iodinated contrast material recommend intravenous prophylactic hydration to prevent post-contrast adverse (renal) effects. Recently, guidelines have been updated and standard prophylaxis is no longer recommended for the majority of patients. The current study aims to evaluate the consequences for clinical practice of the updated guidelines in terms of complications, hospitalisations, and costs. METHODS: The Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Reduction of the prophylaxis Threshold (CINART) project is a retrospective observational study. All elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast administration at Maastricht University Medical Centre (UMC+) in patients aged > 18 years, formerly eligible for prophylaxis (eGFR 30-44 ml/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 in combination with diabetes or > 1 predefined risk factor), and currently eligible for prophylaxis (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) were included. Data were used to calculate relative reductions in complications, hospitalisations, and costs associated with standard prophylactic intravenous hydration. CINART is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03227835. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018, 1992 elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast in patients formerly and currently eligible for prophylaxis were identified: 1808 in patients formerly eligible for prophylaxis and 184 in patients currently eligible for prophylaxis. At Maastricht UMC+, guideline updates led to large relative reductions in numbers of complications of prophylaxis (e.g. symptomatic heart failure; - 89%), extra hospitalisations (- 93%), and costs (- 91%). CONCLUSION: Guideline updates have had a demonstrable impact on daily clinical practice benefiting patient, hospital, and health care budgets. Clinical practice varies between institutions and countries; therefore, a local estimation model is provided with which local impact on costs, hospitalisations, and complications can be calculated. KEY POINTS: • Clinical practice guidelines recommend prophylactic intravenous hydration to prevent post-contrast adverse outcomes such as contrast-induced acute kidney injury. • Clinical practice guidelines have recently been updated, and standard prophylaxis is no longer recommended for the majority of patients. • The guideline updates have a large impact on daily clinical practice: relative reductions at Maastricht UMC+ were - 89% prophylaxis complications, - 93% hospitalisations, and - 91% costs, and similar reductions are expected for Dutch and adherent European medical centres.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos de Yodo/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Medios de Contraste/economía , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
5.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(1): 14-23, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309279

RESUMEN

Static indices, such as the central venous pressure, have proven to be inaccurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. An emerging approach uses dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness (FT-DYN), such as stroke volume variation (SVV) or surrogate dynamic variables, as more accurate measures of volume status. Recent work has demonstrated that goal-directed therapy guided by FT-DYN was associated with reduced intensive care unit (ICU) mortality; however, no study has specifically assessed this in surgical ICU patients. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of employing FT-DYN in the perioperative care of surgical ICU patients on length of stay in the ICU. As secondary objectives, we performed a cost analysis of FT-DYN and assessed the impact of FT-DYN versus standard care on hospital length of stay and mortality. We identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL that examined adult patients in the ICU who were randomized to standard care or to FT-DYN from inception to September 2017. Two investigators independently reviewed search results, identified appropriate studies, and extracted data using standardized spreadsheets. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out. Eleven RCTs were included with a total of 1015 patients. The incorporation of FT-DYN through SVV in surgical patients led to shorter ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.43d; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.09 to -0.78), shorter hospital length of stay (WMD, -1.96d; 95% CI, -2.34 to -1.59), and trended toward improved mortality (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.03). There was a decrease in daily ICU-related costs per patient for those who received FT-DYN in the perioperative period (WMD, US$ -1619; 95% CI, -2173.68 to -1063.26). Incorporation of FT-DYN through SVV in the perioperative care of surgical ICU patients is associated with decreased ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ICU costs.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Fluidoterapia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Resucitación/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Volumen Sistólico
6.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 64(6): 781-788, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037505

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of albumin-based fluid support in patients with septic shock is currently unknown. METHODS: In a simulation study, we compared standard medical practice and systematic 20% albumin infusion. The study population consisted of patients with septic shock admitted to one of the 28 ICUs belonging to the Cub-Réa regional database between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Cost estimates were based on French diagnosis-related groups and fixed daily prices. Estimation of mortality reduction relied on ALBIOS trial data documenting a Risk Ratio of 0.87 in a non-preplanned subgroup of patients with septic shock. Life expectancy was estimated with follow up data of 184 patients with septic shock admitted in the year 2000 in the same ICUs. Several sensitivity analyses were performed including a one-way Deterministic Sensitivity Analysis (DSA) and a Probabilistic multivariate Sensitivity Analysis (PSA). RESULTS: About 6406 patients were included. In the base-case scenario, the mean live years gained with albumin was 0.49. The mean extra cost of using albumin was €480 per year. The cost per year gained was €974. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The probability of albumin being cost-effective was 95% and 97% for a threshold fixed at €20 000 and €30 000 per life-year saved, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the risk reduction observed in the septic shock subgroup analysis of the ALBIOS dataset, the application of the ALBIOS trial results to Cub-Réa data may suggest that albumin infusion is likely cost-effective in septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Albúminas/economía , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Choque Séptico/economía , Choque Séptico/terapia , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/economía , Francia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Prohibitinas
7.
J Trauma Nurs ; 27(3): 141-145, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371730

RESUMEN

Postoperative patients are susceptible to alterations in electrolyte homeostasis. Although electrolytes are replaced in critically ill patients, stable asymptomatic non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients often receive treatment of abnormal electrolytes. We hypothesize there is no proven benefit in asymptomatic patients. In 2016, using the electronic medical records and pharmacy database at a university academic medical center, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of the frequency and cost of electrolyte analysis (basic metabolic panel [BMP], ionized calcium [Ca], magnesium [Mg], and phosphorus [P]) and replacement (potassium chloride [KCl], Mg, oral/iv Ca, oral/iv P) in perioperative patients. Patients without an oral diet order, with creatinine more than 1.4, age less than 16 years, admitted to the ICU, or with length of stay of more than 1 week were excluded. Nursing costs were calculated as a fraction of hourly wages per laboratory order or electrolyte replacement. One hundred thirteen patients met our criteria over 11 months. Mean length of stay was 4 days; mean age was 54 years; and creatinine was 0.67 ± 0.3. Electrolyte analysis laboratory orders (n = 1,045) totaled $6,978, and BMP was most frequently ordered accounting for 36% of laboratory costs. In total, 683 doses of electrolytes cost the pharmacy $1,780. Magnesium was most frequently replaced, followed by KCl, P, and Ca. Nursing cost associated with electrolyte analysis/replacement was $7,782. There is little evidence to support electrolyte analysis and replacement in stable asymptomatic noncritically ill patients, but their prevalence and cost ($146/case) in this study were substantial. Basic metabolic panels, pharmacy charges for potassium, and nursing staff costs accounted for the most significant portion of the total cost. Considering these data, further research should determine whether these practices are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/economía , Electrólitos/economía , Fluidoterapia/economía , Magnesio/economía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Potasio/economía , Enfermería de Trauma/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermería de Trauma/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
PLoS Med ; 16(1): e1002734, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over half a million children die each year of diarrheal illness, although nearly all deaths could be prevented with oral rehydration salts (ORS). The literature on ORS documents both impressive health benefits and persistent underuse. At the same time, little is known about why ORS is underused and what can be done to increase use. We hypothesized that price and inconvenience are important barriers to ORS use and tested whether eliminating financial and access constraints increases ORS coverage. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In July of 2016, we recruited 118 community health workers (CHWs; representing 10,384 households) in Central and Eastern Uganda to participate in the study. Study villages were predominantly peri-urban, and most caretakers had no more than primary school education. In March of 2017, we randomized CHWs to one of four methods of ORS distribution: (1) free delivery of ORS prior to illness (free and convenient); (2) home sales of ORS prior to illness (convenient only); (3) free ORS upon retrieval using voucher (free only); and (4) status quo CHW distribution, where ORS is sold and not delivered (control). CHWs offered zinc supplements in addition to ORS in all treatment arms (free in groups 1 and 3 and for sale in group 2), following international treatment guidelines. We used household surveys to measure ORS (primary outcome) and ORS + zinc use 4 weeks after the interventions began (between April and May 2017). We assessed impact using an intention-to-treat (ITT) framework. During follow-up, we identified 2,363 child cases of diarrhea within 4 weeks of the survey (584 in free and convenient [25.6% of households], 527 in convenient only [26.1% of households], 648 in free only [26.8% of households], and 597 in control [28.5% of households]). The share of cases treated with ORS was 77% (448/584) in the free and convenient group, 64% (340/527) in the convenient only group, 74% (447/648) in the free only group, and 56% (335/597) in the control group. After adjusting for potential confounders, instructing CHWs to provide free and convenient distribution increased ORS coverage by 19 percentage points relative to the control group (95% CI 13-26; P < 0.001), 12 percentage points relative to convenient only (95% CI 6-18; P < 0.001), and 2 percentage points (not significant) relative to free only (95% CI -4 to 8; P = 0.38). Effect sizes were similar, but more pronounced, for the use of both ORS and zinc. Limitations include short follow-up period, self-reported outcomes, and limited generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Most caretakers of children with diarrhea in low-income countries seek care in the private sector where they are required to pay for ORS. However, our results suggest that price is an important barrier to ORS use and that switching to free distribution by CHWs substantially increases ORS coverage. Switching to free distribution is low-cost, easily scalable, and could substantially reduce child mortality. Convenience was not important in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number AEARCTR-0001288.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea Infantil/terapia , Fluidoterapia , Adulto , Preescolar , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Diarrea/economía , Diarrea/terapia , Diarrea Infantil/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Uganda
9.
Liver Transpl ; 25(1): 135-139, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447173

RESUMEN

Many studies have shown that 20% human albumin solution infusions improve circulatory function in patients with advanced liver disease, and this treatment is widely recommended and used by all hepatologists. However, it is more expensive than other crystalloids or colloids, and several countries suffer shortages of supply. This article examines whether other fluids might be considered for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/terapia , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Albúmina Sérica Humana/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Coloides , Soluciones Cristaloides/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Cristaloides/economía , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/normas , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Trasplante de Hígado , Sustitutos del Plasma/administración & dosificación , Sustitutos del Plasma/economía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Albúmina Sérica Humana/efectos adversos , Albúmina Sérica Humana/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(4): 357-364, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30950987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine common practice for fluid management after cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease among pediatric cardiac intensivists. DESIGN: A survey consisting of 17 questions about fluid management practices after pediatric cardiac surgery. Distribution was done by email, social media, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies website, and World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies newsletter using the electronic survey distribution and collection system Research Electronic Data Capture. SETTING: PICUs around the world. SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists managing children after surgery for congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One-hundred eight responses from 18 countries and six continents were received. The most common prescribed fluids for IV maintenance are isotonic solutions, mainly NaCl 0.9% (42%); followed by hypotonic fluids (33%) and balanced crystalloids solutions (14%). The majority of the respondents limit total fluid intake to 50% during the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. The most frequently used fluid as first choice for resuscitation is NaCl 0.9% (44%), the second most frequent choice are colloids (27%). Furthermore, 64% of respondents switch to a second fluid for ongoing resuscitation, 76% of these choose a colloid. Albumin 5% is the most commonly used colloid (61%). Almost all respondents (96%) agree there is a need for research on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates great variation in fluid management practices, not only for maintenance fluids but also for volume resuscitation. Despite the lack of evidence, colloids are frequently administered. The results highlight the need for further research and evidence-based guidelines on this topic.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Soluciones Isotónicas/administración & dosificación , Coloides/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Cristaloides/administración & dosificación , Fluidoterapia/economía , Humanos , Soluciones Hipotónicas , Soluciones Isotónicas/economía , Soluciones Isotónicas/provisión & distribución
11.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 288, 2019 Mar 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30866876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the 2016-2017 austral summer, unprecedented water scarcity was observed in the south of Mayotte, French island in the Indian Ocean. Therefore, authorities introduced restrictive measures to save the water of this part of the island. The rationing system affected over 65,000 people, for four months. In order to detect a possible deterioration of the health situation, a strengthened epidemiological surveillance system was set up. METHODS: Surveillance focused on intestinal and skin diseases, which are often associated with a lack of hygiene or poor-quality drinking and bathing water. Three pathologies were monitored: acute diarrhoea, acute gastroenteritis and skin diseases and also, proportion of antidiarrhoeal and rehydration solutions sales in pharmacies. Cases of leptospirosis were also under surveillance. The analyses consisted of comparing the collected data according to the areas that were either affected or not affected by the water restrictions. Comparisons with historical data were also made. RESULTS: Although none of the surveillance systems were able to demonstrate any impact on skin diseases, they revealed a very sharp increase in the proportion of consultations for acute diarrhoea and gastro-enteritis in the southern area. This was corroborated by a high increase in the sales of antidiarrhoeals and oral rehydration solutions via the sentinel pharmacists in the south of the island compared with those of the north. Comparison with historical data highlighted the occurrence of an unusual situation. CONCLUSION: These water restrictions caused a real deterioration in the health status of the inhabitants who were deprived of water.


Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Vigilancia de la Población , Abastecimiento de Agua/estadística & datos numéricos , Antidiarreicos/economía , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/terapia , Fluidoterapia/economía , Francia/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/terapia , Humanos , Farmacias/economía , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología
12.
Lancet ; 389(10076): 1312-1322, 2017 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233565

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravenous saline is recommended in clinical practice guidelines as the cornerstone for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with compromised renal function. However, clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this prophylactic hydration treatment in protecting renal function has not been adequately studied in the population targeted by the guidelines, against a group receiving no prophylaxis. This was the aim of the AMACING trial. METHODS: AMACING is a prospective, randomised, phase 3, parallel-group, open-label, non-inferiority trial of patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy according to current guidelines. High-risk patients (with an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 30-59 mL per min/1·73 m2) aged 18 years and older, undergoing an elective procedure requiring iodinated contrast material administration at Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous 0·9% NaCl or no prophylaxis. We excluded patients with eGFR lower than 30 mL per min/1·73 m2, previous dialysis, or no referral for intravenous hydration. Randomisation was stratified by predefined risk factors. The primary outcome was incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase in serum creatinine from baseline of more than 25% or 44 µmol/L within 2-6 days of contrast exposure, and cost-effectiveness of no prophylaxis compared with intravenous hydration in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. We measured serum creatinine immediately before, 2-6 days, and 26-35 days after contrast-material exposure. Laboratory personnel were masked to treatment allocation. Adverse events and use of resources were systematically recorded. The non-inferiority margin was set at 2·1%. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02106234. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2014, and July 17, 2016, 660 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive no prophylaxis (n=332) or intravenous hydration (n=328). 2-6 day serum creatinine was available for 307 (92%) of 332 patients in the no prophylaxis group and 296 (90%) of 328 patients in the intravenous hydration group. Contrast-induced nephropathy was recorded in eight (2·6%) of 307 non-hydrated patients and in eight (2·7%) of 296 hydrated patients. The absolute difference (no hydration vs hydration) was -0·10% (one-sided 95% CI -2·25 to 2·06; one-tailed p=0·4710). No hydration was cost-saving relative to hydration. No haemodialysis or related deaths occurred within 35 days. 18 (5·5%) of 328 patients had complications associated with intravenous hydration. INTERPRETATION: We found no prophylaxis to be non-inferior and cost-saving in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy compared with intravenous hydration according to current clinical practice guidelines. FUNDING: Stichting de Weijerhorst.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Fluidoterapia , Yohexol/análogos & derivados , Enfermedades Renales/prevención & control , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Yohexol/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 18(4): 295-301, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29847401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Establishing vascular access is a common neonatal intensive care unit procedure. The extended dwell peripheral intravenous (EPIV) catheter is a 6-cm and 8-cm silicone catheter for peripheral vein insertion, which is a newer vascular access device than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter. Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheters have been widely used in adults but evidence in neonates is lacking. PURPOSE: To explore indwell time, success rate, catheter-associated complications, and cost among EPIV catheters, PICCs, and PIV catheters in neonates. METHODS: We retrospectively compare patient demographics, indwell time, success rate, and catheter-associated complications, and analyze the rate of hyaluronidase-treated intravenous (IV) fluid extravasation on neonates who had an EPIV catheter, a PICC, or a PIV catheter in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. We also estimate the insertion cost of these 3 vascular access devices on the basis of our hospital charges. RESULTS: Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheters were inserted in 432 neonates with an indwell time of 4.0 ± 2.3 (mean ± SD) days. Peripherally inserted central catheters were inserted in 202 neonates with an average indwell time of 7.3 ± 4.4 (mean ± SD) days, which was longer than EPIV catheters (P < .001). Peripherally inserted central catheters had a higher success rate of 83.6% than 71.7% of EPIV catheters, meaning succeeded in lasting through the completion of therapy (P = .001). Peripherally inserted central catheters were associated with 4 cases of life-threatening complications; none was seen in the EPIV catheter group. The incidence of hyaluronidase-treated IV fluid extravasation was less in EPIV catheter recipients (1.2%) than in the PIV catheter recipients (3.9%) (P = .004); none was in the PICC group. Cost savings were noted with using an EPIV catheter. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Extended dwell peripheral intravenous catheter is a feasible option for neonatal vascular access. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: These data provide a baseline for future studies to explore the efficacy and effectiveness of EPIV catheter in the neonates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/instrumentación , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/uso terapéutico , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/epidemiología
14.
Value Health ; 18(5): 605-13, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several minimally invasive techniques for cardiac output monitoring such as the esophageal Doppler (ED) and arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis (APPWA) have been shown to improve surgical outcomes compared with conventional clinical assessment (CCA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in high-risk abdominal surgery from the perspective of the French public health insurance fund. METHODS: An analytical decision model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of ED, APPWA, and CCA. Effectiveness data were defined from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials. The clinical end points were avoidance of hospital mortality and avoidance of major complications. Hospital costs were estimated by the cost of corresponding diagnosis-related groups. RESULTS: Both goal-directed therapy strategies evaluated were more effective and less costly than CCA. Perioperative mortality and the rate of major complications were reduced by the use of ED and APPWA. Cost reduction was mainly due to the decrease in the rate of major complications. APPWA was dominant compared with ED in 71.6% and 27.6% and dominated in 23.8% and 20.8% of the cases when the end point considered was "major complications avoided" and "death avoided," respectively. Regarding cost per death avoided, APPWA was more likely to be cost-effective than ED in a wide range of willingness to pay. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output monitoring during high-risk abdominal surgery is cost-effective and is associated with a reduced rate of hospital mortality and major complications, whatever the device used. The two devices evaluated had negligible costs compared with the observed reduction in hospital costs. Our comparative studies suggest a larger effect with APPWA that needs to be confirmed by further studies.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Presión Arterial , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/economía , Gasto Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía Doppler/economía , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluidoterapia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/economía , Anciano , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Árboles de Decisión , Ecocardiografía Doppler/instrumentación , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Método de Montecarlo , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sector Público/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 20(4): 402-7, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24979711

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fluid therapy practices are an ongoing debate in critical care as evidence continues to emerge on the clinical effectiveness of different fluids and regimens. Although fluid therapy is a frequent and often costly treatment in the ICU, cost considerations have been largely absent from these studies. To facilitate a more structured approach to understanding fluid therapy costs and their role in clinical practice, we summarize currently available options and describe a framework for identifying and organizing relevant costs. RECENT FINDINGS: Fluid therapy is a complex area of care that has been rarely studied from a cost-effectiveness perspective. We identify seven cost areas that capture fluid therapy-related costs during preutilization, point-of-utilization, and postutilization periods. These costs are driven by decisions on the type of fluid and administration strategy. Although estimates for some cost areas could be informed by medical literature, other cost areas remain unclear and require further investigation. SUMMARY: Given the growing emphasis on the value of care, providers must recognize the important cost consequences of clinical decisions in fluid therapy. Future research into fluid therapy costs is needed and can be guided by this framework. Developing a complete cost picture is an initial and necessary step for improving values for patients, hospitals, and healthcare systems.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Fluidoterapia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Humanos
16.
Crit Care ; 18(5): 566, 2014 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25304776

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pay-for-performance programs and economic constraints call for solutions to improve the quality of health care without increasing costs. Many studies have shown decreased morbidity in major surgery when perioperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is used. We assessed the clinical and economic burden of postsurgical complications in the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) in order to predict potential savings with GDFT. METHODS: Data from adults who had a major surgical procedure in 2011 were screened in the UHC database. Thirteen post-surgical complications were tabulated. In-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay and costs from patients with and without complications were compared. The risk ratios reported by the most recent meta-analysis were used to estimate the potential reduction in post-surgical morbidity with GDFT. Potential cost-savings were calculated from the actual and anticipated morbidity rates. RESULTS: A total of 75,140 patients met the search criteria, and 8,421 patients developed one or more post-surgical complications (morbidity rate 11.2%). In patients with and without complications, in-hospital mortality was 12.4% and 1.4% (P <0.001), mean hospital length of stay was 20.5 ± 20.1 days and 8.1 ± 7.1 days (P <0.001) and mean direct costs were $47,284 ± 49,170 and $17,408 ± 15,612 (P < 0.001), respectively. With GDFT, morbidity rate was projected to decrease to 8.0 - 9.3%, yielding gross costs savings of $43 M - $73 M for the study population or $569 - $970 per patient. CONCLUSION: Postsurgical complications have a dramatic impact (+172%) on costs. Potential costs savings resulting from GDFT are substantial. Perioperative GDFT may be recommended not only to improve quality of care but also to decrease costs.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Ahorro de Costo , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad
17.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 14: 40, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the "Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients" trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Hemodinámica , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Volumen Sistólico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Fluidoterapia/economía , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/economía , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/economía , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Br J Anaesth ; 110(4): 607-14, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23257991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative vomiting (POV) is one of the most frequent complications of tonsillectomy in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiemetic effect of super-hydration with lactated Ringer's solution in children undergoing elective otorhinolaryngological surgery. METHODS: One hundred ASA I-II children, aged 1-12 yr, undergoing elective tonsillectomy, with or without adenoidectomy, under general anaesthesia were studied. Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were standardized with fentanyl, mivacurium, and sevoflurane in N(2)O/O(2). Subjects were assigned to one of the two groups: 10 ml kg(-1) h(-1) lactated Ringer's solution or 30 ml kg(-1) h(-1) lactated Ringer's solution. A multivariable logistic regression was used for assessing the effects of super-hydration on POV (defined as the presence of retching, vomiting, or both). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the first 24 h postoperative, the incidence of POV decreased from 82% to 62% (relative reduction of 24%, P=0.026). In the adjusted logistic regression model, subjects in the 10 ml kg(-1) h(-1) group had an odds ratio of POV that was 2.92 (95% confidence interval: 1.14, 7.51) for POV compared with subjects in the 30 ml kg(-1) h(-1) group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative administration of 30 ml kg(-1) h(-1) lactated Ringer's solution significantly reduced the incidence of POV during the first 24 h postoperative. Our results support the use of super-hydration during tonsillectomy, as an alternative way to decrease the risk of POV in children.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/terapia , Tonsilectomía/efectos adversos , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesia General , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/economía , Tonsilectomía/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Am J Emerg Med ; 31(6): 928-34, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23685056

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous (rHFSC) fluid administration compared to intravenous (IV) fluid administration in children with mild to moderate dehydration in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A decision analytic model was created based on the results of a controlled clinical trial that compared the administration of isotonic fluids via rHFSC or IV for rehydration. The costs were determined from the hospital's perspective. The effectiveness unit was successful rehydration in the ED without the need for hospitalization for continued hydration. Mean estimates were determined for both the cost and effectiveness of each treatment. The incremental differences in costs and effectiveness were determined between treatments. Sensitivity analysis testing was also conducted. RESULTS: The treatment success rate was 93% with rHFSC fluids and 76% for IV fluids. Across all ages, the mean cost of rHFSC fluids was $722, compared to $889 for IV fluids. The difference in effectiveness was due to the larger number of patients for whom IV access could not be established, necessitating a rescue route of administration to deliver parenteral fluids. The difference in the overall cost was primarily due to the shorter time in the ED for patients receiving rHFSC fluids versus those treated with IV fluids. The cost-effectiveness of rHFSC compared to IV was most apparent in younger patients (<3 years of age), where IV access was more difficult to obtain. CONCLUSION: Analysis of this clinical trial data revealed that rHFSC fluid administration demonstrated greater treatment effectiveness and cost-effectiveness than traditional IV fluid administration in the ED. The primary reasons for this were the ease of obtaining parenteral access via rHFSC in young patients (especially those under 3) where IV access is difficult, and a shorter ED stay with rHFSC fluid administration.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/administración & dosificación , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/economía , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Infusiones Subcutáneas , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico
20.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 44(6): 1065-71, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24450244

RESUMEN

We studied the cost-benefit of using probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum) in the treatment of 106 children hospitalized with acute diarrhea using a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the probiotics group than in the controlled group (2 versus 3 days, p=0.049), but the median duration of diarrhea and direct medical costs were not significantly different (4 versus 5 days, p=0.068 and 4,418.75 versus 4,778.75 Thai Baht, p=0.342). Taking into consideration parental income loss, a non-significant lower expense was seen in the probiotics group (6,800.33 versus 7,970.92 Thai Baht, p=0.177). A greater cost-benefit with the probiotic treatment is probable, but was not statistically significant in this small study. In conclusion, the probiotics tested shortened the duration of hospitalization of children with diarrhea but the total expenses were not different.


Asunto(s)
Diarrea/terapia , Fluidoterapia/economía , Probióticos/economía , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Tailandia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA