Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 379
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 618(7964): 342-348, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37225979

RESUMEN

If popular online platforms systematically expose their users to partisan and unreliable news, they could potentially contribute to societal issues such as rising political polarization1,2. This concern is central to the 'echo chamber'3-5 and 'filter bubble'6,7 debates, which critique the roles that user choice and algorithmic curation play in guiding users to different online information sources8-10. These roles can be measured as exposure, defined as the URLs shown to users by online platforms, and engagement, defined as the URLs selected by users. However, owing to the challenges of obtaining ecologically valid exposure data-what real users were shown during their typical platform use-research in this vein typically relies on engagement data4,8,11-16 or estimates of hypothetical exposure17-23. Studies involving ecological exposure have therefore been rare, and largely limited to social media platforms7,24, leaving open questions about web search engines. To address these gaps, we conducted a two-wave study pairing surveys with ecologically valid measures of both exposure and engagement on Google Search during the 2018 and 2020 US elections. In both waves, we found more identity-congruent and unreliable news sources in participants' engagement choices, both within Google Search and overall, than they were exposed to in their Google Search results. These results indicate that exposure to and engagement with partisan or unreliable news on Google Search are driven not primarily by algorithmic curation but by users' own choices.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Fuentes de Información , Política , Prejuicio , Motor de Búsqueda , Humanos , Fuentes de Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuentes de Información/provisión & distribución , Prejuicio/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Motor de Búsqueda/métodos , Motor de Búsqueda/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Algoritmos
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(1): 177-184, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37651005

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated how trusting information on cancer varies by the source of information and political viewpoint. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional survey data from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). The study comprised a sample of 2949 adults 18 years and older. The outcome variable was measured by assessing respondents' trust in cancer-related information from various sources, including religious organizations and leaders, government health agencies, charitable organizations, family or friends, and doctors. Political viewpoint was measured as liberal, moderate, and conservative. Multivariate linear probability models were estimated and adjusted for individual-level characteristics. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis found that conservatives (73%, 95% CI = 68-78%) were significantly less likely to trust information on cancer from government health agencies compared to liberals (84%, 95% CI = 80-88%). There was no statistically significant difference in trusting government health agencies between liberals and moderates (80%, 95% CI = 76-84%). Both moderates (27%, 95% CI = 21-34%) and conservatives (34%, 95% CI = 29-39%) were more likely to trust information on cancer from religious organizations and leaders compared to liberals (19%, 95% CI = 13-24%). The relationship between political viewpoint and trust of doctors, family or friends, and charitable organizations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Compared to liberals, conservatives are more likely to trust information on cancer from religious organizations and leaders and less likely to trust government health agencies when adjusting for other covariates. This finding emphasizes the role of political viewpoint in shaping individuals' perceptions of information sources and cancer-related information.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Confianza , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fuentes de Información
3.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 334, 2024 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252025

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The internet is a common source of health information for patients and caregivers. To date, content and information quality of YouTube videos on sarcoidosis has not been studied. The aim of our study was to investigate the content and quality of information on sarcoidosis provided by YouTube videos. METHODS: Of the first 200 results under the search term "sarcoidosis," all English-language videos with content directed at patients were included. Two independent investigators assessed the content of the videos based on 25 predefined key features (content score with 0-25 points), as well as reliability and quality (HONCode score with 0-8 points, DISCERN score with 1-5 points). Misinformation contained in the videos was described qualitatively. RESULTS: The majority of the 85 included videos were from an academic or governmental source (n = 63, 74%), and median time since upload was 33 months (IQR 10-55). Median video duration was 8 min (IQR 3-13) and had a median of 2,044 views (IQR 504 - 13,203). Quality assessment suggested partially sufficient information: mean HONCode score was 4.4 (SD 0.9) with 91% of videos having a medium quality HONCode evaluation. Mean DISCERN score was 2.3 (SD 0.5). Video content was generally poor with a mean of 10.5 points (SD 0.6). Frequently absent key features included information on the course of disease (6%), presence of substantial geographical variation (7%), and importance of screening for extrapulmonary manifestations (11%). HONCode scores were higher in videos from academic or governmental sources (p = 0.003), particularly regarding "transparency of sponsorship" (p < 0.001). DISCERN and content scores did not differ by video category. CONCLUSIONS: Most YouTube videos present incomplete information reflected in a poor content score, especially regarding screening for extrapulmonary manifestations. Quality was partially sufficient with higher scores in videos from academic or governmental sources, but often missing references and citing specific evidence. Improving patient access to trustworthy and up to date information is needed.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoidosis , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Grabación en Video , Humanos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/normas , Grabación en Video/métodos , Grabación en Video/normas , Sarcoidosis/diagnóstico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Información de Salud al Consumidor/métodos , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Internet/normas , Fuentes de Información
4.
J Sex Med ; 21(10): 872-877, 2024 Sep 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165032

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, there is a lack of a structured national plan of sexual education in Italy, with large interregional differences and poor uniformity in the promotion and learning of sexual health. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge on sexuality and reproductive function among adolescents before and after a sexual education program, considering gender differences in the results. METHODS: A longitudinal and interventional study was conducted on high school students. Six sessions for each class were carried out by a multidisciplinary team. Anonymous questionnaires were administered to investigate basic knowledge of human sexuality and reproduction before and after intervention. OUTCOMES: Participants were high school students who completed the questionnaires. Outcomes included pre and posttest answers on the knowledge questionnaire in study population. RESULTS: We obtained data from 842 high school students (mean ± SD age, 16.11 ± 1.74 years). The main informative sources on sexuality were social media in 37.9% of participants; family, school, and scientific material were the main source in 15.1%, 5.2%, and 4.4%, respectively. A total score of 12.6 ± 3.4 (range, 1-20) was obtained on the knowledge questionnaire; specifically, the score was higher in females than males (12.8 ± 3.4 vs 11.9 ± 3.4, P = .0001). In males and females, a statistically significant increase in level of knowledge was found after the multidisciplinary intervention (14.5 ± 3.6, P = .0001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The lack of sexual education programs in schools in Italy compels adolescents to refer to frequently unreliable sources, such as social media and peers, contributing to misinformation and adoption of risky sexual behaviors. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is based on a large sample size and highlights the importance of sexual education programs. The main limitations are a greater representation of the female population and the inclusive nature of the school (ie, an artistic school), attracting students who identify with sexual minorities. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents have limited knowledge about sexuality and reproduction, with a notable gender disparity; sexual education programs in schools, providing information from sexuality experts, led to a substantial increase in knowledge and a reduction in the gender gap.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Salud Reproductiva , Educación Sexual , Salud Sexual , Humanos , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Educación Sexual/métodos , Salud Reproductiva/educación , Italia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuentes de Información
5.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241272477, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138604

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cancer education has been promoted under the Basic Plan for Cancer Education in Japan. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional survey of Japanese students to determine changes in attitudes regarding cancer over time. METHODS: A nationwide survey of fifth-grade elementary students was conducted in February 2013. A repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted following previous studies with second-year high school students in February 2019, as second-year high school students in 2019 corresponded to the generation of fifth-grade students in 2013. The self-administered, multiple-choice questionnaire inquired about the awareness of cancer and its causes and sources of cancer information. Statistical analyses were performed by calculating the percentage of selections and 95% confidence intervals for each question. RESULTS: The differences between values in 2019 and 2013 were examined. Responses were received from 94 schools (44.1%) in 2013 and 114 schools (52.8%) in 2019. After excluding incomplete responses, valid responses from 2213 and 3822 respondents, respectively, were analyzed. Desirable changes over time were observed in awareness. Increasing age was associated with a rise in misperceptions and a decline in desirable rather than undesirable perceptions of the causes of cancer. The Internet was a common source of information among high school students, followed by health education at school. CONCLUSION: Cancer education in schools should aim to counteract misconceptions and promote positive, evidence-based information. Improving perceptions of cancer screening could increase intentions of undergoing screening. Additionally, presenting cancer information using social networking sites could help promote cancer prevention among junior high and high school students.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias , Estudiantes , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Japón/epidemiología , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Niño , Educación en Salud , Fuentes de Información , Pueblos del Este de Asia
6.
Stat Med ; 43(14): 2695-2712, 2024 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606437

RESUMEN

Our work was motivated by the question whether, and to what extent, well-established risk factors mediate the racial disparity observed for colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the United States. Mediation analysis examines the relationships between an exposure, a mediator and an outcome. All available methods require access to a single complete data set with these three variables. However, because population-based studies usually include few non-White participants, these approaches have limited utility in answering our motivating question. Recently, we developed novel methods to integrate several data sets with incomplete information for mediation analysis. These methods have two limitations: (i) they only consider a single mediator and (ii) they require a data set containing individual-level data on the mediator and exposure (and possibly confounders) obtained by independent and identically distributed sampling from the target population. Here, we propose a new method for mediation analysis with several different data sets that accommodates complex survey and registry data, and allows for multiple mediators. The proposed approach yields unbiased causal effects estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage in simulations. We apply our method to data from U.S. cancer registries, a U.S.-population-representative survey and summary level odds-ratio estimates, to rigorously evaluate what proportion of the difference in CRC risk between non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks is mediated by three potentially modifiable risk factors (CRC screening history, body mass index, and regular aspirin use).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Análisis de Mediación , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Simulación por Computador , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Sistema de Registros , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuentes de Información
7.
Ann Behav Med ; 58(1): 12-21, 2024 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37540839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, research investigating psychosocial correlates of COVID-19 vaccination has been cross-sectional, parochial, and/or reliant upon non-stratified international samples, resulting in difficulty in clarifying the contributions of various vaccination-related influences. PURPOSE: The present study tested a novel integration of prospective and concurrent associations of demographic and dispositional tendencies, intervening illness and preventive beliefs, vaccine intention, illness experiences, and concurrent contextual vaccine-related influences with subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: The preregistered study used a stratified online U.S. sample (N = 500), with assessments aligned to (a) "15 days to slow the spread" in March 2020, (b) vaccine authorization and major case/mortality surge during December 2020 and January 2021, and (c) the period following full vaccine approval in August 2021 during the third major/case mortality surge during September and October 2021. RESULTS: Path modeling showed the absence of children in the household and greater education were prospective predictors of vaccination. Trait openness and less conservative political beliefs showed indirect prospective associations with vaccination via stronger intermediating vaccine intention. Contextual vaccine-related influences of vaccine-related information sources, employer mandates, and flu vaccine history also showed direct associations with vaccination. In contrast to expectations, lower conscientiousness showed a direct prospective association with vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for interrelations among study variables, the results of the integrative psychosocial model clarified the unique contributions and pathways from antecedent characteristics to vaccination while accounting for vaccine-related contextual influences, providing further direction for refining the timing and content of public health messaging for vaccination.


The present study used 3 assessments across 18 months to investigate psychosocial and behavioral predictors of COVID-19 vaccination in a stratified U.S. sample. Consistent with preregistered hypotheses, the absence of children in the household and greater education assessed in March 2020, predicted vaccination by the fall of 2021. Greater vaccination intention during the Delta surge from December 2020 to January 2021 (prior to widespread vaccine availability), predicted vaccination by the fall of 2021. In addition, greater trait openness (curious, reflective) and less conservative political beliefs assessed during March 2020, predicted vaccination through stronger vaccination intention. Employer vaccine mandates, a stronger history of flu vaccination, and the use of more reliable health information sources for COVID-19 vaccines also predicted greater vaccination. Contrary to expectations, greater conscientiousness (careful, thorough) assessed during March 2020, predicted less vaccination by the fall of 2021. Notably, the results suggest that for some parents, general vaccine concerns, however, misinformed, may have extended to the consideration of COVID-19 vaccines for themselves. Moreover, for more careful and thorough individuals, novel vaccine hesitancy may be an expression of perceived harm avoidance that is specific to the vaccine, rather than to perceived risks of infection or illness.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Niño , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Intención , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Fuentes de Información , Demografía
8.
Conserv Biol ; 38(4): e14242, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439694

RESUMEN

Expanding digital data sources, including social media and online news, provide a low-cost way to examine human-nature interactions, such as wildlife exploitation. However, the extent to which using such data sources can expand or bias understanding of the distribution and intensity of threats has not been comprehensively assessed. To address this gap, we quantified the geographical and temporal distribution of online sources documenting the hunting and trapping, consumption, or trade of bats (Chiroptera) and compared these with the distribution of studies obtained from a systematic literature search and species listed as threatened by exploitation on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List. Online records were collected using automated searches of Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Bing and were filtered using machine classification. This yielded 953 relevant social media posts and web pages, encompassing 1099 unique records of bat exploitation from 84 countries. Although the number of records per country was significantly predicted by the number of academic studies per country, online records provided additional locations and more recent records of bat exploitation, including 22 countries not present in academic literature. This demonstrates the value of online resources in providing more complete geographical representation. However, confounding variables can bias the analysis of spatiotemporal trends. Online bat exploitation records showed peaks in 2020 and 2014, after accounting for increases in internet users through time. The second of these peaks could be attributed to the COVID-19 outbreak, and speculation about the role of bats in its epidemiology, rather than to true changes in exploitation. Overall, our results showed that data from online sources provide additional knowledge on the global extent of wildlife exploitation, which could be used to identify early warnings of emerging threats and pinpoint locations for further research.


Sondeo del potencial de las fuentes virtuales de datos para mejorar el mapeo de amenazas para las especies por medio del estudio de caso de la explotación mundial de murciélagos Resumen La expansión de las fuentes virtuales, incluidas las redes sociales y las noticias en línea, proporciona una forma asequible de analizar las interacciones entre el humano y la naturaleza, como la explotación de fauna. Sin embargo, no se ha analizado por completo el rango al que dichas fuentes pueden expandir o sesgar el conocimiento de la distribución e intensidad de las amenazas. Para abordar este vacío cuantificamos la distribución geográfica y temporal de las fuentes virtuales que documentan la caza, captura, consumo o mercado de murciélagos (Chiroptera) y las comparamos con la distribución de los estudios obtenidos de una búsqueda sistemática en la literatura y con las especies catalogadas como amenazadas por la explotación según la Lista Roja de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Recolectamos los registros virtuales por medio de búsquedas automatizadas en Facebook, Twitter, Google y Bing y después las filtramos con clasificaciones automatizadas. Esto arrojó 953 publicaciones relevantes en redes sociales y sitios web que englobaban 1099 registros únicos de la explotación de murciélagos en 84 países. Aunque pronosticamos de forma significativa el número de registros por país con el número de estudios académicos por país, los registros virtuales proporcionaron localidades adicionales y registros más recientes de la explotación de murciélagos, incluyendo a 22 países que no se encuentran en la literatura académica. Lo anterior demuestra el valor que tienen los recursos en línea para proporcionar una representación geográfica más completa. Sin embargo, las variables confusas pueden sesgar el análisis de las tendencias espaciotemporales. Los registros virtuales de la explotación de murciélagos mostraron picos en 2020 y en 2014, esto después de considerar el incremento de usuarios de internet con el tiempo. El segundo pico podría atribuirse al brote de COVID­19 y la especulación en torno al papel que tenían los murciélagos en su epidemiología y no tanto a un verdadero cambio en la explotación. En general, nuestros resultados mostraron que los datos de las fuentes virtuales proporcionan conocimiento adicional sobre el alcance mundial de la explotación de fauna, el cual podría usarse para identificar señales tempranas de amenazas emergentes y ubicar localidades para su mayor investigación.


Asunto(s)
Quirópteros , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Especies en Peligro de Extinción , Quirópteros/fisiología , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Animales , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Internet , Fuentes de Información
9.
Methods ; 212: 12-20, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858137

RESUMEN

Gut microbiota plays a crucial role in modulating pig development and health, and gut microbiota characteristics are associated with differences in feed efficiency. To answer open questions in feed efficiency analysis, biologists seek to retrieve information across multiple heterogeneous data sources. However, this is error-prone and time-consuming work since the queries can involve a sequence of multiple sub-queries over several databases. We present an implementation of an ontology-based Swine Gut Microbiota Federated Query Platform (SGMFQP) that provides a convenient, automated, and efficient query service about swine feeding and gut microbiota. The system is constructed based on a domain-specific Swine Gut Microbiota Ontology (SGMO), which facilitates the construction of queries independent of the actual organization of the data in the individual sources. This process is supported by a template-based query interface. A Datalog+-based federated query engine transforms the queries into sub-queries tailored for each individual data source, and an automated workflow orchestration mechanism executes the queries in each source database and consolidates the results. The efficiency of the system is demonstrated on several swine feeding scenarios.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Animales , Porcinos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Fuentes de Información , Semántica
10.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(5): e5787, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724471

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used for medical regulatory decisions, yet concerns persist regarding its reproducibility and hence validity. This study addresses reproducibility challenges associated with diversity across real-world data sources (RWDS) repurposed for secondary use in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Our aims were to identify, describe and characterize practices, recommendations and tools for collecting and reporting diversity across RWDSs, and explore how leveraging diversity could improve the quality of evidence. METHODS: In a preliminary phase, keywords for a literature search and selection tool were designed using a set of documents considered to be key by the coauthors. Next, a systematic search was conducted up to December 2021. The resulting documents were screened based on titles and abstracts, then based on full texts using the selection tool. Selected documents were reviewed to extract information on topics related to collecting and reporting RWDS diversity. A content analysis of the topics identified explicit and latent themes. RESULTS: Across the 91 selected documents, 12 topics were identified: 9 dimensions used to describe RWDS (organization accessing the data source, data originator, prompt, inclusion of population, content, data dictionary, time span, healthcare system and culture, and data quality), tools to summarize such dimensions, challenges, and opportunities arising from diversity. Thirty-six themes were identified within the dimensions. Opportunities arising from data diversity included multiple imputation and standardization. CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions identified across a large number of publications lay the foundation for formal guidance on reporting diversity of data sources to facilitate interpretation and enhance replicability and validity of RWE.


Asunto(s)
Farmacoepidemiología , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Recolección de Datos/normas , Fuentes de Información
11.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(1): e5680, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37650434

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Database Task Force of the Japan Society for Pharmacoepidemiology began its annual surveys of databases available for clinico and pharmacoepidemiological studies in 2010. In this report, we summarize the characteristics of the databases available in Japan based on the results of our 2021 survey to illustrate the recent developments in the infrastructure for database research in Japan. METHODS: We included 20 major databases from the academia, government, or industry that were accessible to third parties. We used a web-based questionnaire to ask the database providers about their characteristics, such as their organization, data source(s), numbers of individuals enrolled, age distribution, code(s) used, and average follow-up periods. RESULTS: We received responses from all 20 databases approached: eight hospital-based databases, six insurer-based databases, four pharmacy-based databases, and two in the "other" category. Among them, 17 contained information from medical claims, pharmacy claims, and/or Diagnosis Procedure Combination data. Most insurer databases contained health check-up data that could be attached to the claims component. Some hospital-based databases had data from electronic medical records. Most insurer-based databases collected data from the insurers of working-age employees and therefore had limited coverage of older people. Most databases coded their medication data using the Japanese reimbursement codes, and many provided Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification codes. CONCLUSIONS: The number of databases available for clinico and pharmacoepidemiological research and the proportion of the population they cover are increasing in Japan. The differences in their characteristics mean that the appropriate database must be selected for a particular study purpose.


Asunto(s)
Farmacoepidemiología , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Anciano , Japón/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fuentes de Información , Bases de Datos Factuales
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(1): e5695, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37690792

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Given limited information available on real-world data (RWD) sources with pediatric populations, this study describes features of globally available RWD sources for pediatric pharmacoepidemiologic research. METHODS: An online questionnaire about pediatric RWD sources and their attributes and capabilities was completed by members and affiliates of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology and representatives of nominated databases. All responses were verified by database representatives and summarized. RESULTS: Of 93 RWD sources identified, 55 unique pediatric RWD sources were verified, including data from Europe (47%), United States (38%), multiregion (7%), Asia-Pacific (5%), and South America (2%). Most databases had nationwide coverage (82%), contained electronic health/medical records (47%) and/or administrative claims data (42%) and were linkable to other databases (65%). Most (71%) had limited outside access (e.g., by approval or through local collaborators); only 10 (18%) databases were publicly available. Six databases (11%) reported having >20 million pediatric observations. Most (91%) included children of all ages (birth until 18th birthday) and contained outpatient medication data (93%), while half (49%) contained inpatient medication data. Many databases captured vaccine information for children (71%), and one-third had regularly updated data on pediatric height (31%) and weight (33%). Other pediatric data attributes captured include diagnoses and comorbidities (89%), lab results (58%), vital signs (55%), devices (55%), imaging results (42%), narrative patient histories (35%), and genetic/biomarker data (22%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview with key details about diverse databases that allow researchers to identify fit-for-purpose RWD sources suitable for pediatric pharmacoepidemiologic research.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Farmacoepidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Asia , Fuentes de Información , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(9): e5862, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39212172

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There has been rapid growth in the variety and number of real-world data (RWD) sources, as well as the number of regulatory documents that provide guidance for assessing the suitability of RWD sources for pharmacoepidemiology studies. This study aims to assess differences in RWD guidance and variability in current practice for identifying and assessing RWD for studies with regulatory purpose. METHODS: Key criteria for feasibility assessment were mapped against relevant regulatory guidance documents across US, EU, and Asia-Pacific regions. An online survey was designed and deployed to International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology members to understand current practice. Findings were summarized and used to inform key considerations and recommendations. RESULTS: Eleven RWD guidance documents were identified and mapped against 14 RWD assessment criteria. Variability was seen across these documents in guidance for these criteria. Between December 2022 and January 2023, 37 survey respondents reported having used RWD for post-marketing commitments (34, 92%) and/or background epidemiology (28, 76%). RWD were mostly identified through literature (33, 89%) and data landscaping (26, 70%); guidance documents referenced included: Food and Drug Administration (20, 54%), European Network for Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (17, 46%), European Medical Agency (16, 43%), and Structured Process to Identify Fit-For-Purpose Data (11, 30%). Challenges for conducting feasibility assessments included RWD accessibility, ability to complete validation, and RWD provider responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines are used extensively by researchers, but key criteria for RWD identification and feasibility assessment are not reflected consistently and challenges remain. Recommendations have been made reflecting study findings.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Farmacoepidemiología , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuentes de Información
14.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(5): e5799, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to developing and conducting a successful multi-data source, non-interventional, post-authorization safety study (NI-PASS) for submission to multiple health authorities. Such studies are often large undertakings; evaluating and sharing lessons learned can provide useful insights to others considering similar studies. OBJECTIVES: We discuss challenges and key methodological and organizational factors that led to the delivery of a successful post-marketing requirement (PMR)/PASS program investigating the risk of cardiovascular and cancer events among users of mirabegron, an oral medication for the treatment of overactive bladder. RESULTS: We provide context and share learnings, including sections on research program collaboration, scientific transparency, organizational approach, mitigation of uncertainty around potential delays, validity of study outcomes, selection of data sources and optimizing patient numbers, choice of comparator groups and enhancing precision of estimates of associations, potential confounding and generalizability of study findings, and interpretation of results. CONCLUSIONS: This large PMR/PASS program was a long-term commitment from all parties and benefited from an effective coordinating center and extensive scientific interactions across research partners, scientific advisory board, study sponsor, and health authorities, and delivered useful learnings related to the design and organization of multi-data source NI-PASS.


Asunto(s)
Acetanilidas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Tiazoles , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Humanos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/administración & dosificación , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetanilidas/efectos adversos , Acetanilidas/administración & dosificación , Acetanilidas/uso terapéutico , Farmacoepidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Proyectos de Investigación , Agentes Urológicos/efectos adversos , Agentes Urológicos/administración & dosificación , Fuentes de Información
15.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(8): 540, 2024 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema in the upper limb remains one of the most distressful complications of breast cancer treatment. YouTube is considered a potential digital resource for population health and decision making. However, access to inadequate information or misinformation could have undesirable impacts. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the reliability, quality and content of YouTube videos on lymphedema as an information source for Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A search of YouTube was conducted in January 2023 using the key words "breast cancer lymphedema" and "lymphedema arm breast cancer." Reliability and quality of the videos were evaluated using the Discern tool, content, source of production, number of likes, comments, views, duration, Video Power Index, likes ratio, view ratio and age on the platform. RESULTS: Amongst the 300 Spanish language videos identified on YouTube, 35 were selected for analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 35 selected videos, 82.9% (n = 29) were developed by healthcare or academic professionals and 17.1% (n = 9) by others. Reliability (p < 0.017) and quality (p < 0.03) were higher in the videos made by professionals. The Discern total score (r = 0.476; p = 0.004), reliability (r = 0.472; p = 0.004) and quality (r = 0.469; p = 0.004) were positively correlated with the duration of the videos. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a strong rationale for educating breast cancer survivors seeking lymphedema information to select videos made by healthcare or academic professionals. Standardised evaluation prior to video publication is needed to ensure that the end-users receive accurate and quality information from YouTube.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Grabación en Video , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Linfedema/etiología , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Información de Salud al Consumidor/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Adulto , Fuentes de Información
16.
J Math Biol ; 88(6): 67, 2024 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641762

RESUMEN

Human mobility, which refers to the movement of people from one location to another, is believed to be one of the key factors shaping the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are multiple reasons that can change human mobility patterns, such as fear of an infection, control measures restricting movement, economic opportunities, political instability, etc. Human mobility rates are complex to estimate as they can occur on various time scales, depending on the context and factors driving the movement. For example, short-term movements are influenced by the daily work schedule, whereas long-term trends can be due to seasonal employment opportunities. The goal of the study is to perform literature review to: (i) identify relevant data sources that can be used to estimate human mobility rates at different time scales, (ii) understand the utilization of variety of data to measure human movement trends under different contexts of mobility changes, and (iii) unraveling the associations between human mobility rates and social determinants of health affecting COVID-19 disease dynamics. The systematic review of literature was carried out to collect relevant articles on human mobility. Our study highlights the use of three major sources of mobility data: public transit, mobile phones, and social surveys. The results also provides analysis of the data to estimate mobility metrics from the diverse data sources. All major factors which directly and indirectly influenced human mobility during the COVID-19 spread are explored. Our study recommends that (a) a significant balance between primitive and new estimated mobility parameters need to be maintained, (b) the accuracy and applicability of mobility data sources should be improved, (c) encouraging broader interdisciplinary collaboration in movement-based research is crucial for advancing the study of COVID-19 dynamics among scholars from various disciplines.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Humanos , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Conceptos Matemáticos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinámica Poblacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuentes de Información
17.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 208(5): 579-588, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37384378

RESUMEN

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease for which novel therapies are needed. External controls (ECs) could enhance IPF trial efficiency, but the direct comparability of ECs versus concurrent controls is unknown. Objectives: To develop IPF ECs by fit-for-purpose data standards to historical randomized clinical trial (RCT), multicenter registry (Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry), and electronic health record (EHR) data and to evaluate endpoint comparability among ECs and the phase II RCT of BMS-986020. Methods: After data curation, the rate of change in FVC from baseline to 26 weeks among participants receiving BMS-986020 600 mg twice daily was compared with the BMS-placebo arm and ECs using mixed-effects models with inverse probability weights. Measurements and Main Results: At 26 weeks, the rates of change in FVC were -32.71 ml for BMS-986020 and -130.09 ml for BMS-placebo (difference, 97.4 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.6-170.2), replicating the original BMS-986020 RCT. RCT ECs showed treatment effect point estimates within the 95% CI of the original BMS-986020 RCT. Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry ECs and EHR ECs experienced a slower rate of FVC decline compared with the BMS-placebo arm, resulting in treatment-effect point estimates outside of the 95% CI of the original BMS-986020 RCT. Conclusions: IPF ECs generated from historical RCT placebo arms result in comparable primary treatment effects to that of the original clinical trial, whereas ECs from real-world data sources, including registry or EHR data, do not. RCT ECs may serve as a potentially useful supplement to future IPF RCTs.


Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Fuentes de Información , Humanos , Capacidad Vital , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón , Resultado del Tratamiento , Progresión de la Enfermedad
18.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 276, 2024 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monkeypox (Mpox) virus infection is a topic of growing interest today because of its potential public health impact and concern about possible outbreaks. Reliable and up-to-date sources of information that provide accurate data on its transmission, symptoms, prevention, and treatment are essential for understanding and effectively addressing this disease. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of sources of information on Mpox virus infection. METHODS: An exhaustive systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the information available in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases up to August 3, 2023. The data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.3. The quality of the cross-sectional studies that formed part of this review was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) tool. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on the study populations. RESULTS: Through electronic searches of five databases, a total of 1833 studies were identified. Twenty-four cross-sectional articles were included, with a total sample of 35,959 participants from 34 countries. The pooled prevalence of each of the included information sources was: social networks reached 59% (95% CI: 50-68%; 29,146 participants; 22 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01); the Internet was 61% (95% CI: 44-77%; 14,002 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), radio reached 10% (95% CI: 07-13%; 8917 participants; 4 studies; I2 = 93%; p < 0.01), television accounted for 24% (95% CI: 09-43%; 14,896 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), and the combination of radio and television accounted for 45% (95% CI: 31-60%; 4207 participants; 7 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01); for newspapers, it was 15% (95% CI: 05-27%; 2841 participants; 6 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01), friends and relatives accounted for 19% (95% CI: 12-28%; 28,470 participants; 19 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), the World Health Organization (WHO) accounted for 17% (95% CI: 07-29%; 1656 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 97%; p < 0.01), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accounted for 10% (95% CI: 03-21%; 2378 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 98%; p < 0.01), and the combination of WHO and CDC websites accounted for 60% (95% CI: 48-72%; 1828 participants; 4 studies; I2 = 96%; p < 0.01), and finally, scientific articles and journals accounted for 24% (95% CI: 16-33%; 16,775 participants; 13 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that people access a variety of information sources to gain knowledge about Mpox virus infection, with a strong emphasis on online sources such as social networks and the Internet. However, it is important to note that the quality and accuracy of information available from these sources can vary, underscoring the need to promote access to reliable and up-to-date information about this disease to ensure public health.


Asunto(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Academias e Institutos , Fuentes de Información
19.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1576, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, it was a key priority for governments globally to ensure agreement with, and subsequently adherence to, imposed public health measures, specifically non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). Prior research in this regard highlighted the role of COVID-19 information sources as well as sociodemographic and other personal characteristics, however, there is only limited evidence including both. To bridge this gap, this study investigated the associations of COVID-19 information sources such as social media and participant characteristics with agreement with and adherence to NPIs during the first lockdown in Austria. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in May 2020 among adult Austrian residents asking about their experiences during the first lockdown. Collected data included sociodemographic characteristics, main COVID-19-related information sources, agreement with/adherence to three NPIs (no physical contact to family members not living in the same household, leisurely walks restricted to members of the same household, mandatory face masks) and information about perceived social support using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), anxiety/depression levels using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), whether participants felt well advised by the government, and whether participants perceived the pandemic to threaten their income. Ordered and multinomial logistic regression models were employed to achieve the research aims. RESULTS: The cross-sectional sample consisted of 559 Austrian residents. Using social media as main COVID-19 information source was consistently associated with lower agreement with NPIs. A positive association with agreement with measures was found for higher educational backgrounds and higher anxiety levels. By contrast, higher levels of depression, not feeling well advised by the government, and perceiving the pandemic as an economic threat were negatively associated with agreement with measures. Moreover, the use of social media as main COVID-19 information source and not feeling well advised by the government were associated with lower adherence to NPIs. By contrast, higher levels of education were associated with higher adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive analysis emphasizes the associations of COVID-19 information sources as well as sociodemographic and other participant characteristics with agreement with and adherence to NPIs, bearing important implications for future public health crisis communication strategies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Austria/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud Pública , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Factores Sociodemográficos , Pandemias , Adolescente , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estudios Transversales , Fuentes de Información
20.
Nurs Res ; 73(4): 261-269, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is a critical tool to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, vaccine uptake varies across communities and is often affected by sociodemographic factors and accessibility. OBJECTIVES: This article outlines a pilot study aimed to examine factors associated with COVID-19 patients within one of the nation's largest safety net healthcare systems. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was conducted with adults over 18 years of age eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Descriptive analysis of survey data collected in 2021-2022 was employed. Unconditional and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between sociodemographics, social factors, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. RESULTS: Study participants ( N = 280) were a diverse patient population, primarily low-income and majority Hispanic/Latinx, with low education levels, but with a high level of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and a high rate of intent to vaccinate again. Approximately 22% report having unstable housing, and 46% experiencing food insecurity. Most trusted sources for COVID-19 data included mainstream media, including TV, radio, and newspapers, and friends, family, or other informal networks. We found that respondents who were satisfied or very satisfied with COVID-19 information received from healthcare providers or the government had higher odds of vaccine uptake rates. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the critical role of access to the COVID-19 vaccine and sources of information as an independent factor in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients within a safety net healthcare system. This study expands the literature on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, particularly in an underresourced region of the South Los Angeles community. Future research is needed to better understand the mechanisms between social determinants of health, perceived discrimination, and vaccine uptake.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Masculino , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/psicología , Fuentes de Información
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA