[Advancements and controversies in conversion therapy for biliary tract malignant tumors with insufficient future liver remnant].

Due to the unique location and aggressive tumor biology,hilar cholangiocarcinoma,intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,and gallbladder cancer often present with obstructive jaundice and require extensive liver resection,also exhibit high rates of recurrence and metastasis after radical excision. Therefore,surgeons should make treatment decisions based on the biliary anatomy of patients and the biological characteristics of tumors as it significantly affects patient's prognosis. Treatment strategy should be made to ensure the successful implementation of radical resection for biliary tract malignant tumors while maximizing the survival benefits of patients. Firstly,conversion of liver function by relieving jaundice technology and conversion of tumor biological characteristics through systematic therapy,followed by the conversion of future liver remnant. Currently,there are still controversies surrounding indications,methods,standards of relieving jaundice,and treatment plans,cycles,evaluation of therapeutic effects for systematic conversion therapy,and the standards and techniques of conversion therapy for future liver remnant.This article discusses these issues through literature analysis and the author's experience in the hope of resonating with colleagues.

Adding a spur valve to laparoscopic portoenterostomy for patients with biliary atresia can achieve a high jaundice clearance rate and lower the number of episodes of cholangitis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding a spur valve to laparoscopic portoenterostomy for patients with biliary atresia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients diagnosed with biliary atresia (BA) who underwent laparoscopic portoenterostomy (Lap-PE) between 2013 and 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: Lap-PE with a spur valve (spur group) and without it (control group). Perioperative management was the same in both groups. We compared patient backgrounds and clinical outcomes, including jaundice clearance and the number of postoperative cholangitis episodes. RESULTS: Of 63 patients reviewed, 16 received a spur valve. There were no statistically significant differences in the patient backgrounds between the groups. All patients in the spur group achieved jaundice clearance. The number of postoperative cholangitis episodes one year after surgery was significantly lower in the spur group than in the control group (1 [0-3] vs. 3 [0-9], p = 0.04). The jaundice-free survival rate with the native liver at one year after surgery was significantly higher in the spur group (100% vs. 53%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a spur valve during Lap-PE significantly lowered the number of cholangitis episodes 1 year after surgery.

Percutaneous stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: side-by-side versus stent-in-stent technique.

BACKGROUND: Currently, side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS) are the two main techniques for stent deployment to treat hilar biliary obstructions. Previous studies comparing these two techniques are very limited, and thus, no consensus has been reached on which technique is better. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of SBS and SIS deployment via a percutaneous approach for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. METHODS: From July 2012 to April 2019, 65 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who underwent bilateral stenting using either the SBS or SIS techniques were included in this study. Among them, 27 patients underwent SIS stent insertion (SIS group), and the remaining 38 patients underwent SBS stent insertion (SBS group). Technical success, improvement of jaundice, complications, duration of stent patency, and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients in the two groups. The serum bilirubin level decreased more rapidly 1 week after the procedures in the SBS group than in the SIS group (P = 0.02). Although the total complication rate did not differ between the two groups, cholangitis was found to be more frequent in the SIS group (P = 0.04). The median stent patency was significantly longer in the SBS group (149 days) than in the SIS group (75 days; P = 0.02). The median overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups (SBS vs. SIS, 155 days vs. 143 days; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transhepatic bilateral stenting using either the SBS or SIS technique is safe and effective in the management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. However, SBS offers a quicker improvement of jaundice, a lower incidence of cholangitis after the procedure, and a longer stent patency period than SIS.

Bridge of preoperative biliary drainage is a useful management for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to clarify the effect of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on postoperative outcomes and the role of preoperative intentional exchange from endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) to endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) for patients waiting to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: We evaluated the effect of PBD and intentional exchange of PBD on the perioperative variables in 292 patients. RESULTS: A total of 179 (61.3%) of 292 patients received PBD. There was no marked difference in the postoperative outcomes between the patients who did and did not receive PBD. Among the 160 patients who initially received endoscopic PBD, 10 (6.3%) underwent stent exchange for stent dysfunction, 59 (36.9%) who did not develop stent dysfunction underwent intentional stent exchange from ENBD to ERBD (bridge PBD group), and 91 (56.9%) did not receive any stent exchange (unchanged PBD group). The bridge PBD group had a longer duration of PBD (37 days) (p < 0.001) and a shorter preoperative hospital stay after PBD (32 days) (p < 0.001) than the unchanged PBD group (25 and 46 days, respectively); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative variables. The incidence of stent exchange due to stent dysfunction in the bridge PBD group (11.9%) was lower than that in patients who initially received ERBD (36.0%) (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Bridge PBD worked well for extending the duration of PBD without worsening the postoperative outcomes after PD.

Comparison of laparoscopic portoenterostomy and open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia.

BACKGROUND: Although open portoenterostomy (OPE) is considered the standard treatment for biliary atresia (BA), laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) is conducted and reported by many investigators. Data on the safety and efficacy of LPE remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of LPE and OPE for the treatment of BA. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The eligible studies were limited to those published in English. The following keywords were used: "biliary atresia," "laparoscopic portoenterostomy," "Kasai portoenterostomy," "open portoenterostomy," "surgery," and "treatment." RESULTS: Nine studies, including 434 patients, were analyzed. The operative time of LPE was significantly longer than that of OPE (MD = 40.55 min, 95% CI 4.83-76.27 min, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the time of hospital stay, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, or the rates of cholangitis, early clearance of jaundice or two-year survival with the native liver. The subgroup analyses revealed that the rate of early clearance of jaundice in the LPE group was significantly higher than that in the OPE group in studies published after 2016 (95% CI 1.04-1.75; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis provides evidence that LPE is a feasible option for patients with BA. LPE should be revaluated by further studies and longer follow-up.

Effectiveness and risk of biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy: review of current status.

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has gained popularity as bridge management to resolve jaundice, but its role is being challenged as it is thought to increase morbidity. To clarify the current recommendations for PBD prior to PD, we reviewed the literature, including all relevant articles published in English up until December, 2015. There is increasing evidence that PBD causes bile infection, which is related to the morbidity of infectious complications. Results of transhepatic drainage are poorer than those of endoscopic stenting, especially in an oncologic setting, although it is still unclear whether metallic stents are superior to nasobiliary drainage. PBD should be avoided whenever possible and performed only in selected cases, such as the emergency setting, an inevitable long delay (>4 weeks) before PD, and jaundice-related anorexia. Seemingly, transhepatic drainage should be reserved for refractory cases if endoscopic drainage is not possible. Further studies comparing endoscopic drainage techniques, such as metallic stents and nasobiliary drainage, are required to assess the most effective technique of PBD. Bile infection should be prevented by adequate antibiotic prophylaxis and treated even in the absence of symptoms, and bile status should be assessed systematically.

PROGNOSIS IN CHRONIC PANCREATITIS AND CANCER WITH A PRIMARY LESION OF THE PANCREATIC HEAD.

Analyzed the results of surgical treatment of 132 patients, including 68 ­ for cancer of the pancreatic head (in 46 ­ with jaundice) and 64 ­ chronic pancreatitis (CP) with a primary lesion of the pancreatic head (16 ­ with jaundice). The distribution of patients into groups was carried out with a maximum value of classification functions calculated by special formulas. Next studied indicators of endothelial dysfunction for differential diagnosis. A certain threshold of VEGF = 346 pg / ml, in which the patients were divid' ed into groups: СP and cancer on the pancreatic head. It was even more accurate indi' cator threshold VEGF = 248 pg / ml. To predict the severity of the pathological process, along with the use of diagnostic data, using the method of classification trees. Pancreatoduodenal resection for Whipple was performed in 23 patients, for Traverso­ Longmire ­ in 8, subtotal right sided pancreatectomy for Fortner ­ in 3, hepaticoje' junostomy by Roux ­ in 8, duodenopreserving resection for Beger ­ in 6, her Bernese option ­ in 7, operation Frey ­ in 51. In 26 (19.7%) patients, minimally invasive inter' vention for removal of bile were spread through the final primary pathological process and severe general state. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 (13.6%) patients, died 3 (2.3%).

Influence of gender and socioeconomic background on the decision to perform gallstone surgery: a population-based register study.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of unequivocal standardized indications for surgery, socioeconomic background and gender may have a major impact on the decision to perform surgery for cholecystolithiasis. The purpose was to assess how decisions to perform surgery in Sweden are influenced by patient-related factors and how this affects the epidemiology of gallstone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is based on the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks), which covers >90% of surgical units, including 98% of all procedures performed. All procedures performed during 2005-2009 were included. Data on socioeconomic background were obtained from Statistics Sweden. The influence of gender and age on decision to perform surgery was tested in multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Up to the age of 40 years, women were 6 times more likely than men to undergo surgery for biliary colic. On the other hand, there was a relative preponderance of men undergoing cholecystectomy for jaundice, cholecystitis, bile duct stone or pancreatitis in the elderly population (p < 0.001). Socioeconomic background did not have any significant impact on the decision to operate. CONCLUSION: Presentations of gallstone disease differ between men and women, as does the decision to perform surgery. The higher incidence of surgery for secondary complications in older men could be explained by a higher prevalence of gallstones resulting from a lower incidence of surgery at a younger age. Whether or not wider indications for surgery in young patients reduce the risk for gallstone complications requiring surgery should be explored in future studies.

Jaundice as a Rare Indication for Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Compression of adjacent anatomic structures by an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can result in a variety of symptoms. We describe the case of an 88-year-old Caucasian woman with jaundice, elevated laboratory parameters for extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholestasis, and concomitant juxtarenal AAA compressing the liver hilum. Following exclusion of other common causes for cholestasis, the patient was considered to have a symptomatic AAA. Open abdominal aortic surgery revealed a contained rupture and was repaired. Obstructive jaundice secondary to a compromising AAA is a rare condition and to the best of our knowledge has not been reported to date.

Functional discrepancy between two liver lobes after hemilobe biliary drainage in patients with jaundice and bile duct cancer: an appraisal using (99m)Tc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging.

PURPOSE: To determine the functional discrepancy between the two liver lobes using technetium 99m ((99m)Tc) diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-galactosyl human serum albumin ( GSA diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-galactosyl human serum albumin ) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) fusion imaging following preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization ( PVE portal vein embolization ) in patients with jaundice who have bile duct cancer ( BDC bile duct cancer ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, with waiver of informed consent. Preoperative (99m)Tc- GSA diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-galactosyl human serum albumin SPECT/CT fusion images from 32 patients with extrahepatic BDC bile duct cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into four groups according to the extent of biliary drainage and presence of a preoperative right PVE portal vein embolization : right lobe drainage group (right drainage), bilateral lobe drainage group (bilateral drainage), left lobe drainage group (left drainage), and left lobe drainage with right PVE portal vein embolization group (left drainage with right PVE portal vein embolization ). Percentage volume and percentage function were measured in each lobe using fusion imaging. The ratio between percentage function and percentage volume (the function-to-volume ratio) was calculated for each lobe, and the results were compared among the four groups. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The median values for the function-to-volume ratio in the right drainage, bilateral drainage, left drainage, and left drainage with right PVE portal vein embolization group were 1.12, 1.05, 1.02, and 0.81 in the right lobe; and 0.51, 0.88, 0.96, and 1.17 in the left lobe. Significant differences in the function-to-volume ratio were observed among the four groups (right drainage vs bilateral drainage vs left drainage vs left drainage with right PVE portal vein embolization ; with P < .002, P = .023, and P < .002 for the right lobe and P < .001, P = .023, and P < .002 for the left lobe). CONCLUSION: Hepatic lobar function significantly differs between the two lobes, depending on the extent of biliary drainage and the presence of portal vein embolization.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Biliary Atresia with Low Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 Levels.

PURPOSE: Serum matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) levels can precisely differentiate biliary atresia (BA) from non-BA cholestasis. However, serum MMP-7 levels of some BA patients were within normal range or slightly elevated. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of biliary atresia with low serum MMP-7 levels. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study. Cases of BA from July 2020 to December 2022 were consecutively enrolled. They were divided into low-MMP-7 group (MMP-7 ≤ 25 ng/ml) and high-MMP-7 group (MMP-7 > 25 ng/ml) according to serum MMP-7 levels preoperatively. The perioperative clinical characteristics, the 3-month and 6-month jaundice clearance rate post-Kasai procedure, and the native liver survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 329 cases were included in this study, 40 of which were divided into the low-MMP-7 group. Preoperative GGT and direct bilirubin levels in the low-MMP-7 group were significantly lower than those in the high-MMP-7 group (258.6 U/L, interquartile range [IQR]: 160.4411.6 vs. 406.8 IU/L, IQR: 215,655.0, P = 0.0076; 103.8 µmol/L, IQR: 79.0,121.4 vs. 115.3 µmol/L, IQR: 94,138.8, P = 0.0071), while the gender, the day at surgery and preoperative ALT, AST, TBA, total bilirubin levels showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). The 3-month and 6-month jaundice clearance rate post-Kasai procedure in the low-MMP-7 group were lower than those in the high-MMP-7 group (29.73% vs. 53.09%, P = 0.049; 32.14% vs. 54.73%, P = 0.023). The 1-year native liver survival rate was 29.63% for the low-MMP-7 group and 53.02% for the high-MMP-7 group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar between low-MMP-7 group and high-MMP-7 group, while patients with low serum MMP-7 levels showed worse prognosis, indicating that this might be listed as a new clinical subtype of BA which could contribute to designing new treatment strategies for BA in the future. STUDY TYPE: Cohort Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The role of prophylactic gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether prophylactic gastrojejunostomy should be performed routinely in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer. SEARCH METHODS: For the initial version of this review, we searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 2010. Literature searches were re-run in August 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic gastrojejunostomy versus no gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer (irrespective of language or publication status). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager (RevMan). We calculated the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat or available case analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We identified two trials (of high risk of bias) involving 152 patients randomised to gastrojejunostomy (80 patients) and no gastrojejunostomy (72 patients). In both trials, patients were found to be unresectable during exploratory laparotomy. Most of the patients also underwent biliary-enteric drainage. There was no evidence of difference in the overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.25), peri-operative mortality or morbidity, quality of life, or hospital stay (MD 0.97 days; 95%CI -0.18 to 2.12) between the two groups. The proportion of patients who developed long-term gastric outlet obstruction was significantly lower in the prophylactic gastrojejunostomy group (2/80; 2.5%) compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (20/72; 27.8%) (RR 0.10; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.37). The operating time was significantly longer in the gastrojejunostomy group compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (MD 45.00 minutes; 95%CI 21.39 to 68.61). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is indicated in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer undergoing exploratory laparotomy (with or without hepaticojejunostomy).

The AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRi) at Kasai Portoenterostomy: Standing the Test of Time.

AIMS: The outcomes following surgical treatment of infants with biliary atresia (BA) varies across the world with many possible confounding factors. APRi (AST-to-platelet ratio index) is a simple surrogate marker of liver fibrosis and we sought to determine its long-term relationship (if any) with outcome post-Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). METHODS: Prospectively acquired database (Jan 1998-Dec 2021). Clearance of jaundice was defined as achieving <20 umol/L post-KPE. Categorical and survival data were tested using Chi2 tests and a log rank test respectively. P ≤ 0.05 was regarded as significant. Data are quoted as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated. RESULTS: There were 473 infants with a calculated APRi at time of KPE [0.70 (IQR 0.45-1.2)] and known outcomes. There was significant but moderate correlation with age at KPE (rS = 0.43; P < 0.0001). APRi was divided into quartiles (1st 0.11-0.44, n = 120; 2nd 0.45-0.69, n = 120; 3rd 0.70-1.18, n = 115 and 4th 1.2-15.1; n = 118). There was a clear distinction in APRi levels between CMV + ve BA and the other groups (Syndromic BA, Cystic BA, Isolated BA), with an overrepresentation of CMV IgM + ve BA in the higher APRi quartiles (Χ2 = 26.6; P = 0.0002). Clearance of jaundice showed a stepwise decrease across the quartiles (67%; 58%; 55%; 49%; overall Χ2 = 7.8, P = 0.049 and P = 0.005 for trend). Decreasing native liver survival also showed a significant trend (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: APRi appears to be of fundamental prognostic value in stratifying the BA population. In our series, CMV status was associated with higher APRi score and appears to be different. This simple variable offers an objective method of assessing the biological status of BA at presentation and variability between different series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (prospective comparison).

Kasai Portoenterostomy Delays: Is a HIDA Scan Worth the Wait?

BACKGROUND: Biliary Atresia (BA), an obstructive cholangiopathy, is the most common cause of end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation in children. Timely differentiation of BA from other causes of neonatal jaundice remains a challenge, yet is critical to improving outcomes. METHODS: Clinical characteristics including demographics, age at jaundice presentation, age at hepatobiliary scintigraphy, age at surgery, severity of liver fibrosis, and native-liver survival were reviewed in infants with hyperbilirubinemia and suspected BA for this single center retrospective cohort study. We investigated the accuracy of hepatobiliary scintigraphy as well as elapsed time from jaundice presentation to diagnostic intervention. RESULTS: BA was suspected in 234 infants. BA was identified in 17% of infants with hepatobiliary scintigraphy and 72% of infants who underwent operative exploration without hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Elapsed time from jaundice presentation to Kasai Portoenterostomy (KPE) for BA patients was 2.1x longer if hepatobiliary scintigraphy was obtained (p = 0.084). The mean age at KPE for this cohort was 66.8 days (n = 54), with a significantly higher mean age at KPE (75.2 days) for infants who were later listed or underwent liver transplantation (p = 0.038). Histologically, the lowest liver fibrosis scores were seen in infants undergoing KPE <30 days old and worsened significantly with increased age (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hepatobiliary scintigraphy compared to operative exploration for the diagnostic evaluation of infants with suspected BA introduces significant time delays to KPE but enables avoidance of surgery in some infants. The temporal pattern of worsening cholestatic liver injury from BA with each day of increased age highlights the importance of intervening as early as possible for the best prognosis. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study, Level of evidence: III.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma: An unusual presentation of jaundice.

Jaundice usually occurs in the late stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Obstructive jaundice is rarely seen as an initial presentation of HCC, as opposed to cholangiocarcinoma. Various causes of obstructive jaundice in these cases also known as "Icteric HCC" have been described such as tumour thrombi, compression, infiltration or tumours arising from native hepatocytes in the bile duct. We present a case of 74-year-old gentleman with "Icteric HCC" that clinically and radiologically mimicked cholangiocarcinoma for which the patient underwent left hepatectomy with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Histopathology revealed dilated large duct with polygonal sheets of cells of hepatoid morphology which stained diffusely positive for both glypican 3 and Hep-par 1. The epicentre was in the left hepatic duct with no discernible liver lesion and the tumour probably originated from the ectopic hepatocytes within the biliary duct The patient was disease free at 1.5 years of follow up. In conclusion, HCC should be a differential for obstructive jaundice. Patients with such "Icteric HCC" benefit from surgical resection with favourable outcomes. The prognosis in such patients is better than in patients of HCC with jaundice due to hepatic insufficiency.

Small-for-size syndrome after living donor liver transplantation: successful treatment with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a serious complication after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) that can disrupt liver regeneration and result in hepatic dysfunction. Until now, the treatment options for SFSS after LDLT have been very limited. Here we describe a patient with SFSS after LDLT who was successfully treated with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). A 56-year-old man who had undergone adult-to-adult LDLT because of decompensated liver cirrhosis started displaying signs of acute jaundice and ascites within 72 hours of the operation. The patient was diagnosed with SFSS, and because he had already undergone splenectomy before the transplant, partial splenic embolization was not feasible. Consequently, the TIPS procedure was chosen in an attempt to reduce portal hyperperfusion. After the procedure, the patient's symptoms were gradually ameliorated and were eventually resolved. In conclusion, when partial splenic embolization is not feasible, TIPS placement may be a feasible option for the treatment of SFSS after LDLT.

HIDA, percutaneous transhepatic cholecysto-cholangiography and liver biopsy in infants with persistent jaundice: can a combination of PTCC and liver biopsy reduce unnecessary laparotomy?

BACKGROUND: Historically, HIDA is the initial diagnostic test in the evaluation of biliary atresia (BA). Non-excreting HIDA scans can yield false-positive results leading to negative laparotomy. OBJECTIVE: Cholestatic infants must be evaluated promptly to exclude biliary atresia (BA) and other treatable hepatic conditions. Intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is the gold standard for diagnosing BA, but requires surgical intervention. Percutaneous transhepatic cholecysto-cholangiography (PTCC) and liver biopsy are less invasive and have been described in small case series. We hypothesized that PTCC and liver biopsy effectively exclude BA, thus avoiding unnecessary IOC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of cholestatic infants who underwent PTCC, biopsy or cholescintigraphy at a tertiary children's hospital from August 1998 to January 2009. Group differences were evaluated and the receiver operator curve and safety of PTCC determined. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-eight cholestatic infants were reviewed. Forty-six (36%) underwent PTCC. Forty-one out of 46 (89%) had simultaneous PTCC and liver biopsy. PTCC was completed successfully in 19/23 (83%) children despite a small or absent GB on initial US. Negative laparotomy rate was 1/6 (17%) for simultaneous PTCC/liver biopsy. Complications occurred in 4/46 including bleeding (n=2), fever with elevated transaminases (n=1) and oxygen desaturations (n=1). CONCLUSION: PTCC, particularly when performed in combination with simultaneous liver biopsy, effectively excludes BA in cholestatic infants with acceptable morbidity. PTCC can frequently be performed when a contracted gallbladder is seen on initial US exam. Negative laparotomy rate is lowest when PTCC is coupled with simultaneous liver biopsy.

Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated duodenal perforation remains controversial. Some recommend surgery, while others recommend conservative treatment. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients treated at our institution for ERCP-related duodenal perforations. Study variables included indication for ERCP, clinical presentation, diagnostic procedures, time to diagnosis and treatment, location of injury, management, length of stay in hospital and survival. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and October 2009, 12 232 ERCP procedures were performed at our centre, and perforation occured in 11 patients (0.08%; 5 men, 6 women, mean age 71 yr). Six of the perforations were discovered during ERCP; 5 required radiologic imaging for diagnosis. Three perforations were diagnosed incidentally by follow-up ERCP. In 1 patient, perforation occurred 3 years after the procedure owing to a dislocated stent. Four of 11 perforations were stent-related; in 2 patients ERCP was performed in a nonanatomic situation (Billroth II gastroenterostomy). Free peritoneal perforation occurred in 4 patients; 1 was successfully managed conservatively. Four patients (36%) were treated surgically and none died. Five patients were managed conservatively with a successful outcome, and 2 patients died after conservative treatment (18%). Operative treatment included hepaticojejunostomy and duodenostomy (1 patient), suture of the perforation with T-drain (1 patient) and suture only (2 patients). The mean length of stay in hospital for all patients was 20 days. CONCLUSION: Post-ERCP duodenal perforations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Immediate surgical evaluation and close monitoring is needed. Management should be individually tailored based on clinical findings only.

Predictors of Jaundice Resolution and Survival After Endoscopic Treatment of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

The benefit of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains controversial. To identify predictors of jaundice resolution after ERCP and whether resolution is associated with improved patient outcomes, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 124 patients with jaundice and PSC. These patients underwent endoscopic biliary balloon dilation and/or stent placement at an American tertiary center, with validation in a separate cohort of 102 patients from European centers. Jaundice resolved after ERCP in 52% of patients. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Independent predictors of jaundice resolution included older age (P = 0.048; odds ratio [OR], 1.03 for every 1-year increase), shorter duration of jaundice (P = 0.059; OR, 0.59 for every 1-year increase), lower Mayo Risk Score (MRS) (P = 0.025; OR, 0.58 for every 1-point increase), and extrahepatic location of the most advanced biliary stricture (P = 0.011; OR, 3.13). A logistic regression model predicted jaundice resolution with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.79) in the validation set. Independent predictors of death or transplant during follow-up included higher MRS at the time of ERCP (P < 0.0001; hazard ratio [HR], 2.33 for every 1-point increase), lower total serum bilirubin before ERCP (P = 0.031; HR, 0.91 for every 1 mg/dL increase), and persistence of jaundice after endoscopic therapy (P = 0.003; HR, 2.30). Conclusion: Resolution of jaundice after endoscopic treatment of biliary strictures is associated with longer transplant-free survival of patients with PSC. The likelihood of resolution is affected by demographic, hepatic, and biliary variables and can be predicted using noninvasive data. These findings may refine the use of ERCP in patients with jaundice with PSC.