Cerebral Blood Flow Assessed with Phase-contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging during Blood Pressure Changes with Noradrenaline and Labetalol: A Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Adequate cerebral perfusion is central during general anesthesia. However, perfusion is not readily measured bedside. Clinicians currently rely mainly on mean arterial pressure (MAP) as a surrogate, even though the relationship between blood pressure and cerebral blood flow is not well understood. The aim of this study was to apply phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to characterize blood flow responses in healthy volunteers to commonly used pharmacologic agents that increase or decrease arterial blood pressure. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers aged 30 to 50 yr were investigated with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring was used. First, intravenous noradrenaline was administered to a target MAP of 20% above baseline. After a wash-out period, intravenous labetalol was given to a target MAP of 15% below baseline. Cerebral blood flow was measured using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and defined as the sum of flow in the internal carotid arteries and vertebral arteries. Cardiac output (CO) was defined as the flow in the ascending aorta. RESULTS: Baseline median cerebral blood flow was 772 ml/min (interquartile range, 674 to 871), and CO was 5,874 ml/min (5,199 to 6,355). The median dose of noradrenaline was 0.17 µg · kg-1 · h-1 (0.14 to 0.22). During noradrenaline infusion, cerebral blood flow decreased to 705 ml/min (606 to 748; P = 0.001), and CO decreased to 4,995 ml/min (4,705 to 5,635; P = 0.01). A median dose of labetalol was 120 mg (118 to 150). After labetalol boluses, cerebral blood flow was unchanged at 769 ml/min (734 to 900; P = 0.68). CO increased to 6,413 ml/min (6,056 to 7,464; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy, awake subjects, increasing MAP using intravenous noradrenaline decreased cerebral blood flow and CO. These data do not support inducing hypertension with noradrenaline to increase cerebral blood flow. Cerebral blood flow was unchanged when decreasing MAP using labetalol.

Clinical Trials That Have Changed Obstetric Practice: The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Trial.

We describe the evolution of treatment recommendations for chronic hypertension (CHTN) in pregnancy, the CHTN and pregnancy (CHAP) trial, and its impact on obstetric practice. The US multicenter CHAP trial showed that antihypertensive treatment for mild CHTN in pregnancy [blood pressures (BP)<160/105 mm Hg] to goal<140/90 mm Hg, primarily with labetalol or nifedipine compared with no treatment unless BP were severe reduced the composite risk of superimposed severe preeclampsia, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, placental abruption, and fetal/neonatal death. As a result of this trial, professional societies in the United States recommended treatment of patients with CHTN in pregnancy to BP goal<140/90 mm Hg.

Cardiac medications in obstetric patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent literature, updated safety data, and major clinical considerations for commonly used medications for arrhythmias, heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and anticoagulation during pregnancy and lactation. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have shown a benefit to more aggressive treatment of mild chronic hypertension to a blood pressure goal of <140/90 with oral labetalol and nifedipine remaining first-line agents. Aspirin is now routinely used for preeclampsia prevention, while experience with other antiplatelet agents, such as purinergic receptor P2Y G protein-coupled 12 (P2Y12) inhibitors, continues to grow. Data on statin therapy are rapidly changing and recent studies suggest this class may not be associated with fetal harm and can be continued in select cases. SUMMARY: As data regarding medication safety continues to evolve, a multidisciplinary team is needed for full consideration of maternal and fetal risks and benefits. Ongoing studies are needed to improve and expand our understanding of medication safety during pregnancy and lactation.

Hypertensive Emergency: Parenteral Antihypertensives and Population Data.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review parenteral therapeutic choices in treatment of hypertensive crises by mechanism of action and summarize recent literature on the management of hypertensive crises. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data have documented the safety and efficacy of labetalol and nicardipine in treatment of hypertensive crises as well as characterized the hypertensive emergency population to a much greater extent. Based on recent data, hypertensive emergencies are seen in 0.5% of all emergency room visits. Ischemic stroke and heart failure/pulmonary edema are the most common forms of organ damage seen in hypertensive emergencies. There are many therapeutic choices in treatment of hypertensive crises with varied mechanisms of action. Large randomized, controlled trial evidence is lacking in this therapeutic area; however, recent data have documented the safety and efficacy of labetalol and nicardipine.

Identifying Targets to Improve the Management of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) define quality indicators, (2) describe care gaps, and (3) identify process issues in severe hypertension (sustained systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥110 mm Hg) management at our tertiary care centre. METHODS: Pregnant and postpartum persons diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy from 2018 to 2019 were identified. A retrospective cohort of patients with severe hypertension was constructed, and data were collected through chart review. Severe hypertension management was assessed according to defined quality indicators. Clinical characteristics were compared between participants with and without time-to-target BP within 60 minutes. Process issues were examined for each severe hypertension occurrence. RESULTS: Of 608 participants with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 90 (15%) experienced severe hypertension. Median time-to-target BP was 76 minutes (interquartile range 47-123 minutes), and target BP (<155/105 mm Hg) was achieved within 60 minutes in 31/90 (34%) participants. Appropriate antihypertensives for severe hypertension were used in 55/90 (61%), and time-to-treatment initiation was within 30 minutes in 42/54 (78%). Chronic hypertension and oral labetalol use were associated with delays in achieving target BP. Process issues related to severe hypertension management included inappropriate treatment (n = 35/90; 39%), failure to recognize severe hypertension as an emergency (n = 21/90; 23%), and delayed treatment initiation (n = 12/54; 22%). CONCLUSION: We defined quality indicators for severe hypertension management. Time-to-target BP within 60 minutes was achieved in a minority of patients, and chronic hypertension was associated with delayed severe hypertension resolution. Process issues in severe hypertension management were described.

Evaluation of intravenous infusion of labetalol versus magnesium sulfate on cerebral hemodynamics of preeclampsia patients with severe features using transcranial doppler.

PURPOSE: It is essential to understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia cerebral complications. This study aimed to compare the cerebral hemodynamic effects of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and labetalol in pre-eclampsia patients with severe features. METHODS: Singleton pregnant women who suffered from late onset preeclampsia with severe features were enrolled and subjected to baseline Transcranial doppler (TCD) evaluation and then randomly assigned to either the magnesium sulfate group or labetalol group. TCD to measure middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow indices including mean flow velocity (cm/s), mean end-diastolic velocity (DIAS), and pulsatility index (PI) and to estimate CPP and MCA velocity were performed as basal measurements before study drug administration and at post-treatment one and six hours after administration. The occurrence of seizures and any adverse effects were recorded for each group. RESULTS: Sixty preeclampsia patients with severe features were included and randomly allocated into two equal groups. In group M the PI was 0.77 ± 0.04 at baseline versus 0.66 ± 0.05 at 1hour and 0.66 ± 0.05 at 6 hours after MgSO4 administration (p value < 0.001) also the calculated CPP was significantly decreased from 103.3 ± 12.7mmHg to 87.8 ± 10.6mmHg and 89.8 ± 10.9mmHg (p value < 0.001) at 1 and 6 hours respectively. Similarly, in group L the PI was significantly decreased from 0.77 ± 0.05 at baseline to 0.67 ± 0.05 and 0.67 ± 0.06 at 1 and 6 hours (p value < 0.001) after labetalol administration. Moreover, the calculated CPP was significantly decreased from 103.6 ± 12.6 mmHg to 86.2 ± 13.02mmHg at 1 hour and to 83.7 ± 14.6mmHg at 6 hours (p value < 0.001). In terms of changes in blood pressure and the heart rate, they were significantly lower in the labetalol group. CONCLUSION: Both magnesium sulfate and labetalol reduce CPP while maintaining cerebral blood flow (CBF) in preeclampsia patients with severe features. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The institutional review board of the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University approved this study with the reference number (ZU-IRB#: 6353-23-3-2020) and it was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04539379).

Pharmacokinetics of the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs throughout pregnancy methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Antihypertensive drugs are among the most prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine have been perceived safe to use during pregnancy and are therefore recommended in international guidelines for treatment of hypertension. In this review, we provide a complete overview of what is known on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antihypertensive drugs methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed to retrieve studies on the PK of methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine used throughout pregnancy. The search was restricted to English and original studies. The systematic search was conducted on July 27, 2021, in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Keywords were methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy, and placenta. RESULTS: A total of 1459 unique references were identified of which title and abstract were screened. Based on this screening, 67 full-text papers were assessed, to retain 30 PK studies of which 2 described methyldopa, 12 labetalol, and 16 nifedipine. No fetal accumulation is found for any of the antihypertensive drugs studied. CONCLUSION: We conclude that despite decades of prescribing methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine throughout pregnancy, descriptions of their PK during pregnancy are hampered by a large heterogeneity in the low number of available studies. Aiming for evidence-based and personalized dosing of antihypertensive medication in the future, further studies on the relationship of both PK and pharmacodynamics (including the optimal blood pressure targeting) during pregnancy and pregnancy-related pathology are urgently needed to prevent undertreatment, overtreatment, and side effects.

A successful experience using labetalol and hemodialysis to treat near-fatal caffeine poisoning: A case report with toxicodynamics.

Caffeine poisoning is relatively rare, and a near-fatal caffeine overdose is highly uncommon. We present an 18-year-old male who attempted suicide with 295 mg/kg pure caffeine powder (lethal oral dose: 150-200 mg/kg) and was successfully rescued. He presented with seizures, refractory supraventricular tachycardia and hypertension for 6 h with no response to medications and cardioversion. Even with the high level of caffeine, labetalol, which is seldom administered as a treatment for caffeine poisoning-induced tachycardia, successfully relieved refractory tachycardia. Then, hemodialysis ultimately eliminated serum caffeine and completely alleviated caffeine-related central nervous system toxicity. We discuss the clinical symptoms, management and toxicodynamics based on the concentration of caffeine and its metabolites in serum and urine.

ß-Blocker Use and Risk of Mortality in Heart Failure Patients Initiating Maintenance Dialysis.

RATIONAL & OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers are recommended for patients with heart failure (HF) but their benefit in the dialysis population is uncertain. Beta-blockers are heterogeneous, including with respect to their removal by hemodialysis. We sought to evaluate whether ß-blocker use and their dialyzability characteristics were associated with early mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease with HF who transitioned to dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults patients with chronic kidney disease (aged≥18 years) and HF who initiated either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis during January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016, within an integrated health system were included. EXPOSURES: Patients were considered treated with ß-blockers if they had a quantity of drug dispensed covering the dialysis transition date. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality within 6 months and 1 year or hospitalization within 6 months after transition to maintenance dialysis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Inverse probability of treatment weights using propensity scores was used to balance covariates between treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were used to investigate the association between ß-blocker use and study outcomes. RESULTS: 3,503 patients were included in the study. There were 2,115 (60.4%) patients using ß-blockers at transition. Compared with nonusers, the HR for all-cause mortality within 6 months was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94) among users of any ß-blocker and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.88) among users of metoprolol at transition. There were no observed differences in all-cause or cardiovascular-related hospitalization. LIMITATIONS: The observational nature of our study could not fully account for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers were associated with a lower rate of mortality among incident hemodialysis patients with HF. Similar associations were not observed for hospitalizations within the first 6 months following transition to dialysis.

Identification of factors associated with delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric hypertensive emergency is defined as having systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, confirmed 15 minutes apart. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that acute-onset, severe hypertension be treated with first line-therapy (intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine or oral nifedipine) within 60 minutes to reduce risk of maternal morbidity and death. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify barriers that lead to delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed that compared women who were treated appropriately within 60 minutes vs those with delay in first-line therapy. We identified 604 patients with discharge diagnoses of chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia using International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and obstetric antihypertensive usage in a pharmacy database at 1 academic institution from January 2017 through June 2018. Of these, 267 women (44.2%) experienced obstetric hypertensive emergency in the intrapartum period or within 2 days of delivery; the results from 213 women were used for analysis. We evaluated maternal characteristics, presenting symptoms and circumstances, timing of hypertensive emergency, gestational age at presentation, and administered medications. Chi square, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and sample t-tests were used to compare the 2 groups. Univariable logistic regression was applied to determine predictors of delayed treatment. Multivariable regression model was also performed; C-statistic and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the model fit. A result was considered statistically significant at P<.05. RESULTS: Of the 213 women, 110 (51.6%) had delayed treatment vs 103 (48.4%) who were treated within 60 minutes. Patients who had delayed treatment were 3.2 times more likely to have an initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range vs those who had timely treatment (odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-5.68). Timeliness of treatment was associated with presence or absence of preeclampsia symptoms; patients without preeclampsia symptoms were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-4.80). Patients with hypertensive emergencies that occurred overnight between 10 pm and 6 am were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment vs those emergencies that occurred between 6 am and 10 pm (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.83). Delayed treatment also had an association with race, with white patients being 1.8 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.08). Patients who were treated at <60 minutes had a lower gestational age at presentation vs those with delayed treatment (34.6±5 vs 36.6±4 weeks, respectively; P<.001). For every 1-week increase in gestational age at presentation, there was a 9% increase in the likelihood of delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19). Another factor that was associated with delay of treatment was having a complaint of labor symptoms, which made patients 2.2 times as likely to experience treatment delay (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.41). CONCLUSION: Initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range, absence of preeclampsia symptoms, presentation overnight, white race, having complaint of labor symptoms, and increasing gestational age at presentation are barriers that lead to a delay in the treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. Quality improvement initiatives that target these barriers should be instituted to improve timely treatment.

Treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension compared with labetalol, low dose aspirin and placebo.

This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and fetal results in women undergoing antihypertensive therapy (low aspirin or labetalol) with mild to severe chronic hypertension relative to women without medicines. This randomized multi-center clinical trial was performed with random division into three groups of 393 pregnant women with mild to moderate chronic hypertension. From the beginning of the pregnancy to the end of the puerperium, the low dosage aspirin group (n = 129), the labetalol group (n = 127), and the drug-free or control group (n = 126) reported both mother and child results. Major variations in the presence of severely motherly hypertension, pre-eclampsia, renal failure, ECG shifts, and cardiovascular rupture between treatment groups (low doses of aspirin and labetalol) and control groups were noted. Repeated placenta and blood pressure control hospitalizations. (P<0.001) in the control group more often (untreated). The new babies were more vulnerable to gestational age (SGA), neonatal hypotension, neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia, and ICU (p <0.001 in contrast with the low-dose aspirin and control groups). In the control group, the proportion of premature babies was considerably higher than in the treatment group (p<0,05). A mild to moderate persistent high blood pressure during pregnancy therapy helps minimize mother and child occurrence. The use of labetalol is correlated with a higher incidence of SGA, neonatal hypotension, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia relative to low-dose aspirin or control group.

Retrospective evaluation of labetalol as antihypertensive agent in dogs.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect on arterial blood pressure (ABP) of labetalol infusion as treatment for perioperative non nociceptive acute hypertension in dogs. The clinical records of dogs receiving intra or postoperative labetalol infusion were retrospectively reviewed. Invasive systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure and heart rate (HR) before labetalol infusion (T0) and 15, 30, 45 and 60 min (T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively) after infusion were retrieved. The dose rate of labetalol infusion and use of concurrently administered drugs that could have potentially affected ABP and/or HR were also recorded. ANOVA for repeated measures and Dunnett's multiple comparison test were used to determine the effect of labetalol on ABP and HR. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 20 dogs met the inclusion criteria, and hypertension was documented after craniotomy (12/20), adrenalectomy (4/20) and other procedures (4/20). Five dogs received labetalol intraoperatively, 14 postoperatively, and 1 during the surgical procedure and recovery. Median infusion duration and rate were 463 (60-2120) minutes and 1.1 (0.2-3.4) mg/kg/h respectively. Median loading dose was 0.2 (0.2-0.4) mg/kg. Labetalol produced a significant decrease in SAP and DAP at all time points compared to T0 (p < 0.05), while the effect was not significant at T1 for MAP (p = 0.0519). Median maximum MAP decrease was 31 (20-90) mmHg. Heart rate did not increase significantly during treatment (p = 0.2454). Acepromazine given before or during labetalol treatment did not reduce significantly ABP (p = 0.735). CONCLUSIONS: Labetalol produced a reliable and titratable decrease in ABP with non significant increase in HR.

Longitudinal changes in vascular function parameters in pregnant women with chronic hypertension and association with adverse outcome: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Raised vascular function measures are associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate the association between longitudinal vascular function parameters and adverse outcome in pregnant women with chronic hypertension, and to assess whether these measures vary according to baseline parameters such as black ethnicity. METHODS: This was a nested cohort study of women with chronic hypertension and a singleton pregnancy recruited to the PANDA (Pregnancy And chronic hypertension: NifeDipine vs lAbetalol as antihypertensive treatment) study at one of three UK maternity units. Women had serial pulse-wave analyses performed using the Arteriograph®, while in a sitting position, from 12 weeks' gestation onwards. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects logistic regression models. Longitudinal vascular parameters were compared between women who developed superimposed pre-eclampsia (SPE) and those who did not, between women who delivered a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant (birth weight < 10th centile) and those who delivered an infant with birth weight ≥ 10th centile and between women of black ethnicity and those of non-black ethnicity. RESULTS: The cohort included 97 women with chronic hypertension and a singleton pregnancy, of whom 90% (n = 87) were randomized to antihypertensive treatment and 57% (n = 55) were of black ethnicity, with up to six (mean, three) longitudinal vascular function assessments. SPE was diagnosed in 18% (n = 17) of women and 30% (n = 29) of infants were SGA. In women who developed subsequent SPE, compared with those who did not, mean brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) (148 mmHg vs 139 mmHg; P = 0.002), mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (87 mmHg vs 82 mmHg; P = 0.01), mean central aortic pressure (139 mmHg vs 128 mmHg; P = 0.001) and mean augmentation index (AIx-75) (29% vs 22%; P = 0.01) were significantly higher across gestation. In women who delivered a SGA infant compared to those who delivered an infant with birth weight ≥ 10th centile, mean brachial SBP (146 mmHg vs 138 mmHg; P = 0.001), mean DBP (86 mmHg vs 82 mmHg; P = 0.01), mean central aortic pressure (137 mmHg vs 127 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and mean pulse-wave velocity (9.1 m/s vs 8.5 m/s; P = 0.02) were higher across gestation. No longitudinal differences were found in vascular function parameters in women of black ethnicity compared with those of non-black ethnicity. CONCLUSION: There were persistent differences in vascular function parameters and brachial blood pressure throughout pregnancy in women with chronic hypertension who later developed adverse maternal or perinatal outcome. Further investigation into the possible clinical use of these findings is warranted. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Hypertensive Urgency: An Undesirable Complication of a "Male Performance" Herbal Product.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive urgency is a clinical scenario that may be associated with herbal supplement use and that requires special consideration with regard to emergency department management. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old man presented to the emergency department with palpitations and severely elevated blood pressure without evidence of end organ dysfunction. Hypertension failed to be controlled with multiple doses of oral clonidine and intravenous labetalol. The patient later admitted to using an herbal supplement containing yohimbine, a selective ⍺2-adrenoreceptor antagonist specifically linked to cases of refractory hypertension. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Between 17-35% of the U.S. adult population may use herbal supplements on a sporadic or regular basis; pharmacologically active agents in herbal supplements may affect both a patient's presentation and response to treatment. Most patients do not mention over-the-counter and herbal products in their medication profile unless specifically asked, and therefore it is important for emergency physicians to be aware of the pharmacologic effects of herbal supplements in the evaluation and treatment of refractory severe hypertension.

Focused Update on Pharmacologic Management of Hypertensive Emergencies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertensive emergency is defined as a systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg with evidence of new or progressive end-organ damage. The purpose of this paper is to review advances in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies within the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: New literature and recommendations for managing hypertensive emergencies in the setting of pregnancy, stroke, and heart failure have been published. Oral nifedipine is now considered an alternative first-line therapy, along with intravenous hydralazine and labetalol for women presenting with pre-eclampsia. Clevidipine is now endorsed by guidelines as a first-line treatment option for blood pressure reduction in acute ischemic stroke and may be considered for use in intracranial hemorrhage. Treatment of hypertensive heart failure remains challenging; clevidipine and enalaprilat can be considered for use in this population although data supporting their use remains limited.

Pathophysiology and Current Clinical Management of Preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia is characterized by blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg in the second half of pregnancy. This disease is a major contributor to preterm and low birth weight babies. The early delivery of the baby, which becomes necessary for maintaining maternal well-being, makes preeclampsia the leading cause for preterm labor and infant mortality and morbidity. Currently, there is no cure for this pregnancy disorder. The current clinical management of PE is hydralazine with labetalol and magnesium sulfate to slow disease progression and prevent maternal seizure, and hopefully prolong the pregnancy. This review will highlight factors implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia and current treatments for the management of this disease.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome complicating diabetic ketoacidosis; an important treatable complication.

Development of acute neurological symptoms secondary to cerebral oedema is well described in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and often has a poor prognosis. We present the clinical and radiological data of a 17-yr-old girl who developed cortical blindness, progressive encephalopathy, and seizures caused by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) that developed after her DKA had resolved. Vasogenic oedema in PRES resolves if the underlying trigger is identified and eliminated. In this case, hypertension was identified as the likely precipitating factor and following treatment her vision and neurological symptoms rapidly improved. We suggest how recent DKA may have contributed to the development of PRES in this patient.

Longitudinal hemodynamics in acute phase of treatment with labetalol in hypertensive pregnant women to predict need for vasodilatory therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive pregnant women who do not respond to treatment with labetalol to control blood pressure (BP), but require vasodilatory therapy, progress rapidly to severe hypertension. This could be delayed by early recognition and individualized treatment. In this study, we sought to create prediction models from data at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after commencement of treatment to identify patients who will not have a sustained response to labetalol and therefore need vasodilatory therapy. METHODS: The study population comprised 134 women presenting with hypertension at a UK hospital. Treatment with oral labetalol was administered when BP was > 150/100 mmHg or > 140/90 mmHg with systemic disease. BP and hemodynamic parameters were recorded at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after commencement of treatment. Labetalol doses were titrated to maintain BP around 135/85 mmHg. Women with unresponsive BP, despite labetalol dose maximization (2400 mg/day), received additional vasodilatory therapy with nifedipine. Binary logistic and longitudinal (mixed-model) data analyses were performed to create prediction models anticipating the likelihood of hypertensive women needing vasodilatory therapy. The prediction models were created from data at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after treatment, to assess the value of central hemodynamics relative to the predictive power of BP, heart rate and demographic variables at these intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of our cohort required additional vasodilatory therapy antenatally. These women had higher rates of severe hypertension and delivered smaller babies at earlier gestational ages. The unresponsive women were more likely to be of black ethnicity, had higher BP and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), and lower heart rate and cardiac output (CO) at presentation. Those who needed vasodilatory therapy showed an initial decrease in BP and PVR, which rebounded at 24 h, whereas BP and PVR in those who responded to labetalol showed a sustained decrease at 1 h and 24 h. Stroke volume and CO did not decrease during the acute phase of treatment in either group. The best model for prediction of the need for vasodilators was provided at 24 h by combining ethnicity and longitudinal BP and heart rate changes. The model achieved a detection rate of 100% for a false-positive rate of 20% and an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.97. CONCLUSION: Maternal demographics and hemodynamic changes in the acute phase of labetalol monotherapy provide a powerful tool to identify hypertensive pregnant patients who are unlikely to have their BP controlled by this therapy and will consequently need additional vasodilatory therapy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. RESUMEN OBJETIVO: Las embarazadas hipertensas que no responden al tratamiento con labetalol para el control de la presión arterial (PA), pero que requieren terapia vasodilatadora, evolucionan rápidamente hacia una hipertensión severa. Ésta se puede retrasar mediante un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento individual. En este estudio se ha tratado de crear modelos de predicción a partir de datos al inicio del tratamiento y al cabo de 1 hora y de 24 horas después del mismo, para identificar a las pacientes que no mostrarán una respuesta constante al labetalol y que por lo tanto necesitarán terapia vasodilatadora. MÉTODOS: La población de estudio incluyó 134 mujeres con hipertensión en un hospital del Reino Unido. El tratamiento con labetalol por vía oral se administró cuando la PA fue >150/100 mm de Hg o >140/90 mm de Hg con enfermedad multisistémica. Se registró la PA y los parámetros hemodinámicos tanto al inicio como al cabo de 1 h y de 24 h después del inicio del tratamiento. Las dosis de Labetalol se ajustaron para mantener la PA en torno a los 135/85 mm de Hg. Las mujeres cuya PA no produjo respuesta, a pesar de haberles administrado la dosis máxima de labetalol (2400 mg/día), recibieron terapia vasodilatadora adicional con nifedipino. Se realizaron análisis de datos mediante logística binaria y longitudinal (modelo mixto), para crear modelos de predicción con los que pronosticar la probabilidad de la necesidad de terapia vasodilatadora en mujeres hipertensas. Los modelos de predicción se crearon a partir de datos al inicio y al cabo de 1 hora y 24 horas del tratamiento, para evaluar el valor de los parámetros hemodinámicos principales con respecto a la capacidad predictiva de la PA, la frecuencia cardíaca y las variables demográficas en estos intervalos. RESULTADOS: El 22 % de la cohorte necesitó terapia vasodilatadora adicional antes del parto. Estas mujeres tuvieron tasas más altas de hipertensión grave y neonatos más pequeños en edades gestacionales más tempranas. Las mujeres que no respondieron al tratamiento fueron con más frecuencia de raza negra, tuvieron la PA y la resistencia vascular periférica (RVP) más alta, y la frecuencia cardíaca y el gasto cardíaco (GC) más bajos al inicio del tratamiento. Aquellas que necesitaron terapia vasodilatadora mostraron un descenso inicial de la PA y la RVP, que se recuperó al cabo de 24 h, mientras que la PA y la RVP en las que respondieron al labetalol mostraron una disminución constante al cabo de 1 h y de 24 h. El volumen sistólico y el GC no disminuyeron durante la fase aguda del tratamiento en ninguno de los grupos. El mejor modelo para la predicción de la necesidad de vasodilatadores se obtuvo a las 24 h mediante la combinación de la etnia con los cambios longitudinales de la PA y la frecuencia cardíaca. El modelo alcanzó una tasa de detección del 100% para una tasa de falsos positivos del 20% y un área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor de 0,97. CONCLUSIÓN: Los datos demográficos maternos y los cambios hemodinámicos en la fase aguda de la monoterapia con labetalol constituyen una herramienta poderosa para identificar a las pacientes embarazadas hipertensas con pocas probabilidades de que se les pueda controlar su PA mediante esta terapia y que por lo tanto necesitarán terapia vasodilatadora adicional. : 、(blood pressure,BP),。。,1 h24 h,。 : 134。BP>150/100 mmHgBP>140/90 mmHg。1 h24 hBP。,BP135/85 mmHg。BP,()。logistic(),。1 h24 h,,BP、。 : 22%。。,BP(peripheral vascular resistance,PVR),(cardiac output,CO)。BPPVR,24 h,1 h24 hBPPVR。CO。24hBP。100%,20%,0.97。 : ,BP。.

Clinical and radiological features of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in patients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.

AIM: To analyse and summarise clinical and radiological features among patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), to assess related factors with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia, and to compare the different factors between cytotoxic and vasogenic oedema among PRES patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and radiological findings of 237 pre-eclamptic or eclamptic patients with neurological symptoms were evaluated retrospectively. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the differences among these parameters. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (32.07%) were diagnosed with PRES. Multiple logistic regression indicated that seizure (odds ratio [OR], 2.760; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.087-7.011; p=0.033), visual disturbances (OR=2.062 95%CI, 1.033-4.115; p=0.004), multiple production history (OR=3.637; 95% CI: 1.068-8.228; p=0.002) were independent risk factors for PRES. PRES+ (OR=3.217; 95%CI, 1.346-7.686; p=0.009), Visual disturbances (OR=4.283; 95% CI: 1.843-9.953; p=0.001) had strong association with eclampsia. Visual disturbances (OR=7.200; 95% CI: 2.116-24.496; p=0.002) had strong correlation with eclampsia among PRES+ patients. Visual disturbances (OR=2.947; 95% CI: 1.135-7.648; p=0.026) were independently related to cytotoxic oedema. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia patients with neurological symptoms have PRES. Visual disturbances, seizure, multiple production history are independent risk factors for PRES. Visual disturbances have a strong association with eclampsia whether patients have PRES or not. Visual disturbances are independently related to cytotoxic oedema among PRES+ patients.