Rapid Development and Deployment of an Intensivist-Led Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Program.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a rapidly deployed intensivist-led venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation program in a preexisting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. DESIGN: A retrospective observational before-and-after study of 40 patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an established cannulation program by cardiothoracic surgeons versus a rapidly deployed medical intensivist cannulation program. SETTING: An adult ICU in a tertiary academic medical center in Camden, NJ. PATIENTS: Critically ill adult subjects with severe respiratory failure undergoing percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation performed by cardiothoracic surgeons compared with cannulations performed by medical intensivists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation site attempts were retrospectively reviewed. Subject demographics, specialty of physician performing cannulation, type of support, cannulation configuration, cannula size, imaging guidance, success rate, and complications were recorded and summarized. Twenty-two cannulations were performed by three cardiothoracic surgeons in 11 subjects between September 2019 and February 2020. The cannulation program rapidly transitioned to an intensivist-led and performed program in March 2020. Fifty-seven cannulations were performed by eight intensivists in 29 subjects between March 2020 and December 2020. Mean body mass index for subjects did not differ between groups (33.86 vs 35.89; p = 0.775). There was no difference in days on mechanical ventilation prior to cannulation, configuration, cannula size, or discharge condition. There was no difference in success rate of cannulation on first attempt per cannulation site (95.5 vs 96.7; p = 0.483) or major complication rate per cannulation site (4.5 vs 3.5; p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between success and complication rates of percutaneous venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation canulation when performed by cardiothoracic surgeons versus medical intensivist in an already established extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program. A rapidly deployed cannulation program by intensivists for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be performed with high success and low complication rates.

Analysis of Performance Trends from 2010-2019 on the American Board of Internal Medicine Nephrology Certifying Exam.

BACKGROUND: The pass rate on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) nephrology certifying exam has declined and is among the lowest of all internal medicine (IM) subspecialties. In recent years, there have also been fewer applicants for the nephrology fellowship match. METHODS: This retrospective observational study assessed how changes between 2010 and 2019 in characteristics of 4094 graduates of US ACGME-accredited nephrology fellowship programs taking the ABIM nephrology certifying exam for the first time, and how characteristics of their fellowship programs were associated with exam performance. The primary outcome measure was performance on the nephrology certifying exam. Fellowship program pass rates over the decade were also studied. RESULTS: Lower IM certifying exam score, older age, female sex, international medical graduate (IMG) status, and having trained at a smaller nephrology fellowship program were associated with poorer nephrology certifying exam performance. The mean IM certifying exam percentile score among those who subsequently took the nephrology certifying exam decreased from 56.7 (SD, 27.9) to 46.1 (SD, 28.7) from 2010 to 2019. When examining individuals with comparable IM certifying exam performance, IMGs performed less well than United States medical graduates (USMGs) on the nephrology certifying exam. In 2019, only 57% of nephrology fellowship programs had aggregate 3-year certifying exam pass rates ≥80% among their graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IM certifying exam performance, certain trainee demographics, and poorer performance among those from smaller fellowship programs explain much of the decline in nephrology certifying exam performance. IM certifying exam performance was the dominant determinant.

The Safe Discharge Checklist: A Standardized Discharge Planning Curriculum for Medicine Trainees.

OBJECTIVES: Hospital discharge is a challenging time for residents, requiring the completion of many tasks to ensure safe transitions for patients. Despite recognition of the importance of hospital discharge planning, formal curricula are lacking. We sought to improve medicine residents' comfort and skills with discharge planning and enhance the quality of care by introducing a standardized approach to discharge on the medicine wards. METHODS: The intervention included a didactic, a bedside rounds component, and a discharge checklist. Interns were surveyed at the end of rotations to measure confidence, attitudes, and frequency of completing discharge planning tasks. Results were compared with a control group of experienced interns from the previous academic year. Clinical outcomes included hospital readmission and emergency department return rates and patient satisfaction scores in discharge-related domains. RESULTS: Study interns reported similar confidence to control group interns with discharge planning and endorsed completing four of five discharge tasks more frequently than control interns. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify changes in clinical outcomes, although this finding likely reflects the multifactorial nature of hospital readmissions. Interns exposed to the curriculum early in the academic year had a higher reported frequency of completing key discharge tasks and similar confidence around discharge, when compared with end-of-the-year interns. These improvements suggest that the curriculum led to a change in culture surrounding discharge planning and perhaps accelerated learning of skills associated with discharge best practices.

National Resident Matching Program Rank Order and Performance in an Internal Medicine Residency.

OBJECTIVES: Prospective first-year house staff and residency program leaders spend substantial time, effort, and expense preparing a rank order list for the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Previous studies have mostly shown minimal or no relation between rank order and subsequent resident performance, raising questions about the value of this process. Furthermore, no previous studies have been done with Internal Medicine residencies. As such, the purpose of this study was to compare NRMP rank order to multiple objective outcomes of an Internal Medicine residency. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of Internal Medicine residents from five consecutive graduating classes, trained between July 1, 2013 and July 31, 2020, were evaluated for five objective outcomes: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones, faculty rankings of quality, National In-Training Examination scores, chief resident attainment, and fellowship attainment. Outcomes were analyzed in relation to eight potential predictors: NRMP rank, medical school type and grades, immigration status, added qualifications, sex, age and US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: From a cohort of 61 residents, 56 were eligible. All eligible residents' data were included, for a participation rate of 100% (56 of 56). There were no statistically significant univariate or multivariate predictors for the endpoint of fellowship attainment. Higher USMLE scores were predictive of chief resident status in univariate analysis only. NRMP rank was significantly correlated with ACGME milestones in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed that higher USMLE score was statistically significantly predictive of more favorable milestones, faculty ranking, and National In-Training Examination score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher USMLE score was statistically significantly associated with multiple favorable objective residency outcomes in an Internal Medicine residency. A better NRMP rank was correlated with favorable ACGME milestones in univariate analysis, but USMLE score emerged as the strongest predictor in multivariate analysis.

Nationwide Analysis of Endovascular Thrombectomy Provider Specialization for Acute Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Determine the extent of cerebrovascular expertise among the specialties of proceduralists providing endovascular thrombectomy (ET) for emergent large vessel occlusion stroke in the modern era of acute stroke among Medicare beneficiaries Methods: Retrospective cohort study using validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify admissions with acute ischemic stroke and treatment with ET. We identified proceduralist specialty by linking the National Provider Identifier provided by Medicare to the specialty listed in the National Provider Identifier database, grouping into radiology, neurology, neurosurgery, other surgical, and internal medicine. We calculated the number of proceduralists and hospitals who performed ET, ET team specialty composition by hospital, and number of proceduralists who performed ET at multiple hospitals. RESULTS: Forty-two percent (n=5612) of ET were performed by radiology-background proceduralists, with unclear knowledge of how many were cerebrovascular specialists. Neurosurgery- and neurology-background interventionalists performed fewer but substantial numbers of cases, accounting for 24% (n=3217) and 23% (n=3124) of total cases, respectively. ET teams included a neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralist at 65% (n=407) of hospitals that performed ET and included both in 26% (n=160) of teams. CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of ET teams nationwide include a neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralist and higher volume centers in urban areas were more likely to have neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralists with cerebrovascular expertise on their team. It is unclear how many radiology-background interventionalists are cerebrovascular specialists versus generalists. Significant work remains to be done to understand the impact of proceduralist specialty, training, and cerebrovascular expertise on ET outcomes.

Predictors for delayed antibiotic administration among bacteraemic patients in the Emergency Department: Differences between medical and surgical interns.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) have been associated with high mortality. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of early (within 3 hours from triage) administration of first antibiotic dose among patients evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED) with BSI and their role in mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult patients with BSI at the ED of the Hospital of Jura, Switzerland during a 3 year period (July 2014 to June 2017) were included. RESULTS: Among 364 BSI, the most common sites of infection were urinary tract (39.6% of BSIs), lower respiratory tract (15.4%), intra-abdominal (15.4%) and primary BSI (9.1%). One-hundred-seventy-eight patients (48.9%) received the first antibiotic dose within 3 hours from triage. Multivariate analysis identified evaluation by internal medicine intern, triage scales 1 and 2, as predictors of early antibiotic administration, while, primary BSI was associated with delayed antibiotic administration. Thirty-day mortality was 12.9% (47 patients). Charlson comorbidity index, septic shock, low respiratory tract infection were independently associated with mortality, while antibiotic administration within 3 hours from triage and source control within 48 hours from triage were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients received the first antibiotic dose after 3 hours Patients evaluated by surgical interns had a significant delay in administration of antibiotics as compared to those treated by medical interns.

The Impact of Suspension of Dermatology On-Call Services.

BACKGROUND: Dermatological conditions are commonly seen in the emergency department and inpatient wards. The ability to access dermatology on-call services improves the accuracy of diagnosis and management of common and sometimes life-threatening conditions. Limitations of dermatologist availability led to the suspension of the dermatology on-call service for 3 months in Ottawa, Canada. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess the impact of this call suspension on patient care and the need for a dermatology on-call service at our hospital, as perceived by nondermatologist physicians at our center. METHODS: A survey was sent to all departments at The Ottawa Hospital, addressed to staff physicians and residents. Participation was entirely voluntary. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. RESULTS: A total of 105 physicians completed the survey including staff physicians (85%) and resident trainees (15%). The most represented specialties were emergency medicine (N = 21), general internal medicine (N = 19), nephrology (N = 17), neurology (N = 13), and plastic surgery (N = 13). Over half of the respondents felt that the lack of dermatology on-call service impacted the care of their patients by a moderate or great extent. Over half reported performing dermatology-related clinical work during the call suspension and two-thirds of these individuals reported feeling uncomfortable or very uncomfortable doing so. Most (94%) participants felt that an on-call dermatology service was useful and 57% deemed it essential. CONCLUSION: Our survey results demonstrate a significant impact of the suspension of a dermatology on-call service, as perceived by nondermatologist physicians. Hospitals need to recognize the importance of on-call dermatology consultations and provide support for divisions to enable this service to continue.

Identifying and addressing social determinants of health in outpatient practice: results of a program-wide survey of internal and family medicine residents.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of preventable mortality is attributable to social determinants of health (SDOH), yet training on SDOH competencies is not widely implemented in residency. The objective of this study was to assess internal and family medicine residents' competence at identifying and addressing SDOH. METHODS: Residents' perceived competence at identifying, discussing, and addressing SDOH in outpatient settings was assessed using a single questionnaire administered in March 2017. In this cross-sectional analysis, bivariate associations of resident characteristics with the following outcomes were examined: identifying, discussing, and addressing patients' challenges related to SDOH through referrals. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 129 (84%) residents. Twenty residents (16%) reported an annual income of less than $50,000 during childhood. Overall, 108 residents (84%) reported previous SDOH training. Two-thirds had outpatient practices in Veterans Affairs or safety-net clinics. Thirty-nine (30%) intended to pursue a career in primary care. The following numbers of residents reported high levels of competence for performing these outcomes: identifying patients' challenges related to SDOH: 37 (29%); discussing them with patients: 18 (14%); and addressing these challenges through referrals to internal and external resources: 13 (10%) and 11 (9%), respectively. Factors associated with higher competence included older age, lower childhood household income, prior education about SDOH, primary practice site and intention to practice primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Most residents had previous SDOH training, yet only a small proportion of residents reported being highly competent at identifying or addressing SDOH. Providing opportunities for practical training may be a key component in preparing medical residents to identify and address SDOH effectively in outpatient practice.

[Survey of Relatives' Perspective on Dying In The Hospital: A Comparison Between Departments of Internal Medicine and Palliative Care In Styria (Austria)]. / Angehörigenbefragung zum Sterben im Krankenhaus: Ein Vergleich zwischen Abteilungen für innere Medizin und Palliativstationen in der Steiermark (Österreich).

BACKGROUND: Currently, 49% of deaths in Austria occur in a hospital which makes in-patient quality of care as well as quality of death and dying a highly relevant topic. In this article, we compare the quality of care and death and dying in departments of internal medicine and palliative care in hospitals from the perspective of relatives. METHODS: In a pilot study, 210 relatives of patients who died on 4 departments of internal medicine and 2 departments of palliative care in the state of Styria (Austria) were interviewed in 2015-2017 by means of a postal survey with regard to communication by hospital personnel, quality of care, and time of dying. RESULTS: Compared to the departments of internal medicine, the 2 departments of palliative care were perceived to provide better quality of care and better service with regard to the time of death and dying, that is, timely communication of critical health deterioration of the patient, enabling relatives' attendance at the time of death, preparing relatives, and the quality of death of the patient. CONCLUSION: Against the background of the large proportion of individuals who die in hospitals in Austria, this exploratory study showed that relatives perceived both better quality of care and better quality of death and dying in the assessed departments of palliative care compared to the departments of internal medicine. Thus, a more comprehensive and systematic evaluation of the potential added value of palliative care teams in Austrian hospitals is recommended.

Improving Opioid Management and Resource Utilization in an Internal Medicine Residency Clinic: A Before-After Study over Two Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles.

Objective Chronic pain and opioid management are challenging in primary care, especially for trainees with discontinuous ambulatory schedules and less practice experience. The study objective was to improve adherence to quality metrics and office visit utilization in a resident clinic. Design Before-after quality improvement intervention over two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Setting Suburban, university-affiliated Internal Medicine resident clinic. Methods During the 2015-2017 academic years, two sequential interventions were implemented: 1) use of electronic pain and opioid management templates and workflow redesign routing opioid renewals through a registered nurse (RN); 2) RN previsit planning and daily nurse-physician huddles before patient visits. Outcomes included adherence to annual toxicology screening, risk assessment and opioid agreements, opioid dose prescribed, and office visit utilization. Results The template and workflow redesign intervention increased annual toxicology from 53% to 81% (P < 0.0015), annual opioid agreement from 13.8% to 53.5% (P < 0.0001), and risk assessment from 0% to 75.9% (P < 0.0001). Average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) decreased from 96.6 MME to 67.7 MME (P < 0.0001), and annual office visits decreased from 11.1 to 8.9 (P = 0.0004). Previsit planning and huddles did not show incremental increases in adherence to quality measures but did improve clinic utilization and maintained high levels of adherence to quality measures. Conclusions Quality improvement interventions can improve adherence to quality measures and clinic utilization. A critical role is served by midlevel nursing providers to provide continuity to patients and trainees. Teaching clinics need to develop sustainable systems of care to moderate quality assurance in opioid prescribing.

Impact of pharmacy-led medication reconciliation on admission to internal medicine service: experience in two tertiary care teaching hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement identifies medication reconciliation as the shared responsibility of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians, where each has a defined role. The study aims to assess the clinical impact of pharmacy-led medication reconciliation performed on day one of hospital admission to the internal medicine service. METHODS: This is a pilot prospective study conducted at two tertiary care teaching hospitals in Lebanon. Student pharmacists who were properly trained and closely supervised, collected the medication history, and pharmacists at the corresponding sites performed the reconciliation process. Interventions related to the unintended discrepancies were relayed to the medical team. The main outcome was the number of unintended discrepancies identified. The time needed for medication history, and the information sources used to complete the Best Possible Medication History were also assessed. The unintended discrepancies were classified by medication class and route of medication administration, by potential severity, and by proximal cause leading to the discrepancy. For the bivariate and multivariable analysis, the dependent variable was the incidence of unintended discrepancies. The "total number of unintended discrepancies" was dichotomized into yes (≥ 1 unintended discrepancy) or no (0 unintended discrepancies). Independent variables tested for their association with the dependent variable consisted of the following: gender, age, creatinine clearance, number of home medications, allergies, previous adverse drug reactions, and number of information sources used to obtain the BPMH. Results were assumed to be significant when p was < 0.05. RESULTS: During the study period, 204 patients were included, and 195 unintended discrepancies were identified. The most common discrepancies consisted of medication omission (71.8%), and the most common agents involved were dietary supplements (27.7%). Around 36% of the unintended discrepancies were judged as clinically significant, and only 1% were judged as serious. The most common interventions included the addition of a medication (71.8%) and the adjustment of a dose (12.8%). The number of home medications was significantly associated with the occurrence of unintended discrepancies (ORa = 1.11 (1.03-1.19) p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy-led medication reconciliation upon admission, along with student pharmacist involvement and physician communication can reduce unintended discrepancies and improve medication safety and patient outcomes.

Converting acute inpatient take to outpatient take with fast-track assessment in internal medicine wards - a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: With an extensive rise in the number of acute patients and increases in both admissions and readmissions, hospitals are at times overcrowded and under immense pressure and this may challenge patient safety. This study evaluated an innovative strategy converting acute internal medicine inpatient take to an outpatient take. Here, acute patients, following referral, underwent fast-track assessment to the needed level of medical care as outpatients, directly in internal medicine wards. METHOD: The two internal medicine wards at Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg, Denmark, changed their take of acute patients 1st of March 2017. The intervention consisted of acute medical patients being received in medical examination chairs, going through accelerated evaluation as outpatients with assessment within one hour for either admission or another form of treatment. A before-and-after study design was used to evaluate changes in activity. All referred patients for 10 months following implementation of the intervention were compared with patients referred in corresponding months the previous year. RESULTS: A total of 5339 contacts (3632 patients) who underwent acute medical assessment (2633 contacts before and 2706 after) were included. Median hospital length-of-stay decreased from 32.6 h to 22.3 h, and the proportion of referred acute patients admitted decreased with 36.3% points from 94.5 to 58.2%. The median length-of-admission time for the admitted patients increased as expected after the intervention. The risk of being admitted, being readmitted as well as having a hospital length-of-time longer than 24 h, 72 h or 7 days, respectively, were significantly lower during the after-period in comparison to the before-period. Adverse effects, unplanned re-contacts, total contacts to general practice and mortality did not change after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Assessing referred acute patients in medical examination chairs as outpatients directly in internal medicine wards and promoting an accelerated trajectory, reduced inpatient admissions and total length-of-stay considerably. This strategy seems effective in everyday acute medical patients and has the potential to ease the increasing pressure on the acute take for wards receiving acute medical patients.

Self-reported test ordering practices among Canadian internal medicine physicians and trainees: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Over-testing is a recognized problem, but clinicians usually lack information about their personal test ordering volumes. In the absence of data, clinicians rely on self-perception to inform their test ordering practices. In this study we explore clinician self-perception of diagnostic test ordering intensity. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of inpatient General Internal Medicine (GIM) attending physicians and trainees at three Canadian teaching hospitals. We collected information about: self-reported test ordering intensity, perception of colleagues test ordering intensity, and importance of clinical utility, patient comfort, and cost when ordering tests. We compared responses of clinicians who self-identified as high vs low utilizers of diagnostic tests, and attending physicians vs trainees. RESULTS: Only 15% of inpatient GIM clinicians self-identified as high utilizers of diagnostic tests, while 73% felt that GIM clinicians in aggregate ("others") order too many tests. Survey respondents identified clinical utility as important when choosing to order tests (selected by 94%), followed by patient comfort (48%) and cost (23%). Self-identified low/average utilizers of diagnostic tests were more likely to report considering cost compared to high utilizers (27% vs 5%, P = 0.04). Attending physicians were more likely to consider patient comfort (70% vs 41%, p = 0.01) and cost (42% vs 17%, p = 0.003) than trainees. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of data, providers seem to recognize that over investigation is a problem, but few self-identify as being high test utilizers. Moreover, a significant percentage of respondents did not consider cost or patient discomfort when ordering tests. Our findings highlight challenges in reducing over-testing in the current era.

Associations Between American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Status and Performance on a Set of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Process Measures.

Background: The value of the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program has been questioned as a marker of physician quality. Objective: To assess whether physician MOC status is associated with performance on selected Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) process measures. Design: Annual comparisons of HEDIS process measures among physicians who did or did not maintain certification 20 years after initial certification. Setting: Fee-for-service Medicare. Participants: 1260 general internists who were initially certified in 1991 and provided care for 85 931 Medicare patients between 2009 and 2012. Measurements: Annual percentage of a physician's Medicare patients meeting each of 5 HEDIS annual or biennial standards and a composite indicating meeting all 3 HEDIS diabetes standards. Results: Among the 1260 physicians, 786 maintained their certification from 1991 to 2012 and 474 did not. The mean annual percentage of HEDIS-eligible diabetic patients who completed semiannual hemoglobin A1c testing was 58.4% among physicians who maintained certification and 54.4% among those who did not (regression-adjusted difference, 4.2 percentage points [95% CI, 2.0 to 6.5 percentage points]; P < 0.001). Diabetic patients of physicians who maintained certification more frequently met the annual standard for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol measurement (83.1% vs. 80.5%; regression-adjusted difference, 2.3 percentage points [CI, 0.6 to 4.1 percentage points]; P = 0.008) and all 3 diabetic standards (46.0% vs. 41.6%; regression-adjusted difference, 3.1 percentage points [CI, 0.5 to 5.7 percentage points]; P = 0.019). The regression-adjusted difference in biennial eye examinations was statistically insignificant (P = 0.112). Measures for LDL cholesterol testing in patients with coronary heart disease and biennial mammography were also met more frequently among physicians who maintained certification (79.4% vs. 77.4% and 72.0% vs. 67.8%, respectively), with regression-adjusted differences of 1.7 percentage points (CI, 0.2 to 3.3 percentage points; P = 0.032) and 4.6 percentage points (CI, 2.9 to 6.3 percentage points; P < 0.001), respectively. Limitation: Potential confounding by unobserved patient, physician, and practice characteristics; inability to determine clinical significance of observed differences. Conclusion: Maintaining certification was positively associated with physician performance scores on a set of HEDIS process measures. Primary Funding Source: American Board of Internal Medicine.

Investigating inappropriate admissions and hospitalizations in Yasuj educational hospitals based on appropriateness evaluation protocol (AEP): A case study in the internal and surgical wards.

BACKGROUND: Examining the conditions for hospital admission and its appropriateness, and continuous investigation of hospital services are important issues that can improve resource productivity, service quality, and hospital efficacy. So, the present study was conducted to determine the appropriateness of the services provided in Yasuj educational hospitals. METHODS: This descriptive-analytical study was carried out on 204 hospitalized patients who were selected through multistage quota sampling in 2016. The appropriateness evaluation protocol (AEP) was used to collect the data. Analytical tests such as paired t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the relationship between appropriate and inappropriate admission and hospitalization and demographic characteristics. The data were analyzed using the SPSS18 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 980 days of stay were evaluated, and according to the AEP, 35 days of hospitalization were considered inappropriate (3.57%). The mean hospitalization duration was 6/16 ± 5/53 days. The results showed that inappropriate admission and hospitalization rates were respectively 0.6% and 13.8%. CONCLUSION: Unnecessary admissions and hospitalizations can be considered as one of the challenges of the health system. Reducing unnecessary hospitalization will increase hospital productivity, reduce the waiting list and hospitalization costs, and also reduce the risk of exposure to hospital infections. In order to prevent inappropriate admissions and unnecessary hospitalizations, special measures can be taken, including the use of clinical guidelines, modification of the discharge process, and modification of the lower levels of the service providing system.

[General medical care in French psychiatric units for inmates: A national survey]. / Soins médicaux généraux en unité hospitalière spécialement aménagée : une enquête nationale.

OBJECTIVES: The UHSA (UHSA) are French psychiatric units for inmates which admit detainees suffering from a psychiatric disorder requiring full-time hospital care. Non-psychiatric pathologies are overrepresented in patients with psychiatric disorders but also in detainees. As a result, patients hospitalized in UHSA are largely exposed to non-psychiatric conditions, and exploring the organization of general medical care for these patients appears very relevant. The aim of this study is to review the general medical care in all French UHSA. METHODS: A descriptive study was carried out through a survey of the nine facilities. RESULTS: All UHSA benefit from the intervention of a general practitioner. The physical clinical examination, the biological assessment and the electrocardiogram are systematically performed at the patient's admission in 7, 5 and 9 establishments, respectively. However, the offer of general medical care in UHSA seems disparate and sometimes insufficient. Specialized consultations are regularly requested during hospitalizations, but no establishment benefits from a telemedicine system or specialized consultations on site. The extraction of the patient to the general hospital is therefore systematic when such a consultation is needed. But the number of penitentiary escorts per day is limited. In 6 UHSA, medical extractions are thus regularly canceled by the penitentiary administration, sometimes without a medical opinion. Finally, the patient's regular physician is only contacted in 3 UHSA during hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, ways of improving the organization of general medical care in UHSA are proposed through four main axes: the structure and general organization; the general medical care; the link with the healthcare partners and the articulation with the penitentiary administration.

PERCEPTION OF FIRST-YEAR VERSUS SIXTH-YEAR MEDICAL STUDENTS IN SERBIA ON STUDYING MEDICINE AND POSTGRADUATE CAREER.

Self-perceived stress during undergraduate medical training could influence forthcoming career choices. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and potential differences between 1st and 6th year students regarding aspects of medical training and career plans. As many as 570 students in 1st and 400 in 6th year of studies at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, were recruited on December 2-9, 2013. Data were acquired through a self-administered questionnaire. Students in both years rated "Helping other people" as the most important reason to study medicine. Freshmen rated statistically significantly higher 'good incomes' and 'social status' as reasons to study medicine (p=0.003 and p=0.037, respectively). The most desirable fields of specialization were surgery and internal medicine (36.4% and 18.7% for 1st year, and 26.3% and 36.6% for 6th year, respectively). Significantly more freshmen would prefer working abroad (χ2=3.891, p=0.029). In terms of careers abroad, students in both years expressed the highest interest in working in western and northern Europe. Desires for specialty training among medical students follow the pattern of the most frequent disciplines in the Serbian physician population, with gender differences comparable to other populations. A certain percentage of students would likely emigrate.

Association of albumin and cholesterol levels with incidence of hypoglycaemia in people admitted to general internal medicine units.

AIM: To study the association between serum albumin and cholesterol levels at hospital admission and incident hypoglycaemia among people admitted to internal medicine units. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, we examined the electronic medical records of people hospitalized in internal medicine departments. Data extracted included all glucose measurements as well as serum albumin and cholesterol, which were measured upon admission. A hypoglycaemia event was recorded for a given person if at least one glucose measurement of ≤ 3.9 mmol/l was recorded during the hospital stay. Regression analysis was used to determine which clinical measures predict hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: During the acquisition period, 45 224 people (mean age 68.9 ± 17.8 years, 49.4% male, 21.1% diabetes mellitus) were discharged from internal medicine units. Hypoglycaemia was documented in 7.5% of these individuals (15.4% of people with diabetes vs. 5.5% of those without; P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that both serum albumin [odds ratio (OR) 0.908, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.896-0.919; P < 0.001) and cholesterol (OR 0.938, 95% CI 0.896-0.981; P = 0.005] were significantly associated with incident hypoglycaemia. Results remained significant even after controlling for age, sex, average glucose during hospitalization, length of hospital stay, acute infection upon admission, diabetes status, haemoglobin, white blood cell count and C-reactive levels. A combination of hypoalbuminaemia (< 35 g/l) and hypocholesterolaemia (< 3.37 mmol/l) upon admission greatly increased the risk of incident hypoglycaemia (OR 2.544, 95% CI 2.096-3.088; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminaemia and hypocholesterolaemia predict incident hypoglycaemia in the hospital setting among people with and without diabetes mellitus.

Assessment of practices in screening and treating women with bacteriuria.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based screening and treatment for bacteriuria is crucial to prevent increasing antibiotic resistance. The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) previously released guidelines on the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. The study's objective was to assess physicians' practices in managing women with bacteriuria relative to these guideline recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from physicians were collected using an anonymous questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of adherence to guidelines. RESULTS: Data were collected from 260 physicians. Over half of physicians surveyed were unfamiliar with IDSA guidelines and overtreat ASB. Variables independently associated with overtreatment of ASB included a non-academic practice and practicing as an OBGYN. Nearly one third (30.1%) of physicians reported prescribing an antibiotic other than a recommended first-line agent for uncomplicated cystitis. Relative to internists, OBGYNs and urologists were more likely to prescribe a recommended first-line agent to women with uncomplicated cystitis. Of those who correctly selected a first-line agent, 29.8% prescribed a longer than recommended duration of therapy. IDSA guideline awareness was not associated with physicians' practices in managing women with bacteriuria. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians surveyed were unfamiliar with guidelines related to managing ASB and uncomplicated UTIs in women, likely contributing to overscreening and overtreatment of ASB and the use of inappropriate antibiotic regimens in treating uncomplicated cystitis. However, optimal antibiotic prescribing was not associated with knowledge of IDSA guidelines, suggesting that guideline dissemination alone may not alter practice patterns among physicians managing women with bacteriuria.

Factors associated with internal medicine physician job attitudes in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: US healthcare organizations increasingly use physician satisfaction and attitudes as a key performance indicator. Further, many health care organizations also have an academically oriented mission. Physician involvement in research and teaching may lead to more positive workplace attitudes, with subsequent decreases in turnover and beneficial impact on patient care. This article aimed to understand the influence of time spent on academic activities and perceived quality of care in relation to job attitudes among internal medicine physicians in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with inpatient attending physicians from 36 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Participants were surveyed regarding demographics, practice settings, workplace staffing, perceived quality of care, and job attitudes. Job attitudes consisted of three measures: overall job satisfaction, intent to leave the organization, and burnout. Analysis used a two-level hierarchical model to account for the nesting of physicians within medical centers. The regression models included organizational-level characteristics: inpatient bed size, urban or rural location, hospital teaching affiliation, and performance-based compensation. RESULTS: A total of 373 physicians provided useable survey responses. The majority (72%) of respondents reported some level of teaching involvement. Almost half (46%) of the sample reported some level of research involvement. Degree of research involvement was a significant predictor of favorable ratings on physician job satisfaction and intent to leave. Teaching involvement did not have a significant impact on outcomes. Perceived quality of care was the strongest predictor of physician job satisfaction and intent to leave. Perceived levels of adequate physician staffing was a significant contributor to all three job attitude measures. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding opportunities for physician involvement with research may lead to more positive work experiences, which could potentially reduce turnover and improve system performance.