Effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy with mezlocillin plus sulbactam on the incidence and height of fever after severe acute ischemic stroke: the Mannheim infection in stroke study (MISS).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fever after stroke is a strong predictor for a negative outcome with infections as the most common cause. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy on the incidence and height of fever after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled study of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with ischemic stroke enrolled within 24 hours from clinical onset who presented bedridden (modified Rankin score >3) with no significant infection. Interventions included prophylactic mezlocillin plus sulbactam (3 x 2 g/1 g for 4 days) or conventional management. Over 10 days, body temperature was continuously monitored, and the presence of infection was daily assessed. Primary end points were incidence and height of fever; secondary end points included rate of infection and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included (mean, 75 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 16). Over the first 3 days, patients in the intervention group showed lower mean body temperatures as well as lower daily peak temperatures (P<0.05). Throughout the observation period, 15 of 30 patients in the intervention group but 27 of 30 patients in the conventionally treated group developed an infection (P<0.05). Mean interval until the diagnosis of infection was 5.1 days in the intervention group and 3.3 days in the control group (P<0.05). Clinical outcome was more favorable in patients with prophylactic therapy (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute severe stroke, prophylactic administration of mezlocillin plus sulbactam over 4 days decreases body temperature, lowers the rate of infection, and may be associated with a better clinical outcome.

Hypoprothrombinemia in patients with cancer receiving cefoperazone and mezlocillin.

Forty-one patients with cancer who were receiving cefoperazone sodium plus mezlocillin sodium were prospectively followed up for the development of abnormal bleeding or hypoprothrombinemia. Ten of 41 patients developed an increased prothrombin time, three with a hemorrhagic episode. Serum transport proteins and serum carotene were measured in 18 patients, six of whom developed hypoprothrombinemia. Low serum prealbumin and low serum carotene levels were associated with the development of hypoprothrombinemia. Patients with cancer are especially predisposed to the development of antibiotic-associated hypoprothrombinemia. This is probably a result of protein-calorie malnutrition and low vitamin K stores.

Influence of coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin and cefotaxime in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal failure.

The pharmacokinetic disposition of cefotaxime, desacetyl cefotaxime, and mezlocillin after the administration of each drug singly and in combination was examined in eight healthy volunteers and in five anuric patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the presence of ESRD, the total body clearance of cefotaxime decreased from 256.7 +/- 41.5 to 65.4 +/- 42.0 ml/min, and its elimination half-life (t1/2) increased from 1.1 to 3.6 hours as compared with healthy volunteers. Concomitant administration of mezlocillin in healthy volunteers decreased the total body clearance of cefotaxime by 42% and increased its steady-state volume of distribution. This reduction in clearance was reflected by a decrease in both renal and nonrenal clearances. In the presence of ESRD, coadministration of mezlocillin increased the t1/2 of cefotaxime to 5.8 hours. Desacetyl cefotaxime accumulated in ESRD with a prolongation of its elimination t1/2 to 18.7 hours from 1.7 hours in healthy volunteers. Desacetyl cefotaxime peak plasma concentrations occurred later with the combination regimen in the presence of ESRD. The clearance of mezlocillin was reduced and t1/2 prolonged in ESRD from 194.6 +/- 31.9 to 76.4 +/- 38.8 ml/min and 1.4 to 2.3 hours, respectively. Concomitant administration of cefotaxime did not alter the pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin. These data suggest that in the presence of normal renal function, lower doses of cefotaxime may be adequate to maintain similar cefotaxime plasma concentrations when mezlocillin is coadministered compared to when cefotaxime is given alone. Additional pharmacodynamic and clinical studies with this combination are warranted to further elucidate the clinical impact of this pharmacokinetic interaction.

Vancomycin-induced neutropenia complicating bone marrow recovery in a patient with leukemia. Case report and review of the literature.

Neutropenia associated with intravenous vancomycin therapy is reported in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia. The patient received 12 days of vancomycin therapy without incidence; however, a second course of vancomycin initiated on hospital day 14 produced severe neutropenia. This delayed onset is typical of vancomycin-induced neutropenia. The neutropenia reversed, without complications, as soon as the vancomycin was discontinued.

Cefoperazone plus piperacillin versus mezlocillin plus tobramycin as empiric therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.

The double beta-lactam combination of cefoperazone plus piperacillin was compared with an aminoglycoside-containing regimen of mezlocillin plus tobramycin in a prospective, randomized trial of empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients (neutrophils no more than 1,000/mm3). Thirty febrile episodes were treated with cefoperazone plus piperacillin and mezlocillin plus tobramycin, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, sex, pretherapy neutrophil count, and mean duration of therapy. The majority of patients had neutrophil counts of no more than 200/mm3 at the initiation of therapy. Only microbiologically and clinically documented infections were evaluated for efficacy. The cefoperazone plus piperacillin regimen appeared to have a comparable response rate with the mezlocillin plus tobramycin regimen (20 of 24 patients [83 percent] versus 16 of 23 patients [70 percent]). Gram-positive micro-organisms were seen predominantly in this study, with the cefoperazone plus piperacillin regimen achieving a bacteriologic response in 84 percent, as opposed to 60 percent for those organisms treated with the mezlocillin plus tobramycin regimen. Neither regimen was totally effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eight superinfections occurred in the cefoperazone plus piperacillin arm, whereas 11 superinfections occurred in the mezlocillin plus tobramycin arm. Although fungal superinfections were most common, the number of gram-positive superinfections in the mezlocillin plus tobramycin arm exceeded those seen in the cefoperazone plus piperacillin arm. The incidence of antibiotic-related side effects was similar in the two groups. Hypokalemia was most frequently seen. Both skin rashes and nephrotoxicity were more common with mezlocillin plus tobramycin. Cefoperazone plus piperacillin was found to be effective empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. This double beta-lactam combination may be particularly useful for patients who have or are at high risk for the development of renal insufficiency.

Comparison of cefoperazone and mezlocillin with imipenem as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Seventy-eight patients with cancer experienced 88 episodes of fever while neutropenic and were randomly assigned to receive empiric antibiotic therapy with cefoperazone 2 g intravenously every 12 hours and mezlocillin 4 g intravenously every six hours or imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg intravenously over 30 to 60 minutes every six hours. Within 96 hours of starting antibiotic treatment, 24 patients (57 percent) treated with cefoperazone and mezlocillin and 34 patients (74 percent) receiving imipenem/cilastatin became afebrile. One half of the patients in each arm required changes in the antibiotic regimen because of side effects, persistent fever with a site suspicious for infection, resistant organisms, or breakthrough bacteremias. Forty patients (95 percent) receiving cefoperazone and mezlocillin and 43 patients (93 percent) receiving imipenem/cilastatin recovered from the neutropenic episode. Two patients in each regimen group died of their underlying disease. One patient in the imipenem/cilastatin arm died of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Although the two regimens are comparable in efficacy, the incidence of side effects favored the cefoperazone and mezlocillin group. No seizures or bleeding were seen in either arm; however, 19 patients (41 percent) receiving imipenem/cilastatin required pretreatment antiemetic drugs for nausea.

Cefoperazone plus mezlocillin for empiric therapy of febrile cancer patients.

Two dosing regimens of cefoperazone plus mezlocillin were compared in a prospective, randomized trial for therapy of febrile cancer patients. The two regimens were 5 g mezlocillin plus 2 g cefoperazone intravenously every four hours (higher dose) or 3 g mezlocillin plus 1 g cefoperazone intravenously every four hours (lower dose). Although the overall response rate was higher with the higher dose regimen (78 percent versus 66 percent, p = 0.04), the two regimens were comparable in patients with documented infections (72 percent versus 68 percent). Likewise, the two regimens were equally effective against those infections in which the pathogen could be determined (82 percent versus 82 percent). Serum bactericidal titers of at least 1:32 against a known pathogen were associated with a higher response rate than were titers of less than 1:32, but the higher dose regimen did not result in higher serum bactericidal titers. Hypoprothrombinemia was a side effect, especially with the higher dose regimen, before prophylactic vitamin K was routinely administered to patients. Since there were no major benefits with the use of the higher dose regimen of mezlocillin plus cefoperazone, the lower dose regimen is more appropriate for routine usage.

Role of parenteral antibiotherapy in gastrointestinal tract flora suppression. A study in children treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation.

In order to determine the effect of parenteral antibiotherapy on the fecal flora in patients with profound and prolonged granulocytopenia, we initiated a prospective study of 62 cases of autologous bone marrow transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy. All patients were children from 2 to 18 years old, isolated in a protective environment, receiving a diet low in viable microbial content but no oral non-absorbable prophylactic antibiotics to decontaminate the gastrointestinal tract. Bacteriological analysis of fecal flora was conducted at least once a week before and during parenteral antibiotherapy, administered at the first greater than 38 degrees C febrile episode in these granulocytopenic patients (granulocyte count less than 0.5 X 10(9)/l). The 58 evaluable patients fell into three groups with regard to the systemic antibiotherapy: group A (n = 16): moxalactam + mezlocillin; group B (n = 15): moxalactam + tobramycin; and group C (n = 27): cefotaxime plus gentamicin. Fecal flora suppression was observed in 51/58 cases (88%) (group A: 15/16, group B: 13/15, group C: 23/27). It always occurred within 5 days of initiating parenteral antibiotherapy and persisted in 88% of the 51 patients over the whole period of systemic antibiotherapy. During the latter, fecal recolonization was observed in seven cases (12%), always by Enterobacteriaceae sensitive to the prescribed systemic antibiotherapy, never responsible for septicemia. Since parenteral antibiotherapy alone was able to suppress the gastrointestinal tract flora, the effects of this treatment should be considered in all trials of digestive tract decontamination.

Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in patients at high risk for infection in biliary surgery: a prospective and randomized study comparing cefonicid with mezlocillin.

The usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary surgery is well established. When antibiotic prophylaxis is not used, wound infection rates after biliary surgery range from 10% to 25%. With antibiotic prophylaxis, the rates can be reduced to less than 5%. Three questions are still controversial: Do all patients undergoing biliary surgery require antibiotic prophylaxis? What is the ideal antibiotic for use in biliary surgery? What should be the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis? In this study we prospectively evaluated the efficacy of a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary surgery, administered to patients at high risk for infection, in a trial comparing cefonicid (a cephalosporin with a long half-life) with mezlocillin (a broad-spectrum ureidopenicillin).

Perioperative mezlocillin vs cefotaxime to prevent infections after genitourinary surgery.

This is a report of a randomized, comparative, double-blind study of mezlocillin and cefotaxime given perioperatively to 100 patients undergoing genitourinary surgery. Of 94 evaluable patients, 2 (4.7%) in the mezlocillin group and 2 (3.9%) in the cefotaxime group infections developed in the immediate postoperative period. The difference in these incidences is not statistically significant. One patient with recent bacterial prostatitis and prostatic calculi received cefotaxime and bacteriuria and sepsis developed on the first postoperative day.

Use of pharmacodynamic concepts in developing a cost-effective dosing method for piperacillin.

Because they were almost always used in combination with an aminoglycoside, piperacillin and mezlocillin were considered therapeutic alternatives at Hartford Hospital, a 900-bed teaching facility. To determine an appropriate comparative dose, the bactericidal activities of 5 gm of mezlocillin and 4 gm and 3 gm of piperacillin were compared. The results demonstrated that 4 gm of piperacillin possessed stronger bactericidal activity than either 3 gm of piperacillin or 5 gm of mezlocillin. Hartford Hospital has since approved an antibiotic management program using 4 gm of piperacillin every 8 hours, thereby reducing the daily cost of antibiotic therapy. The modified program offers the hospital measurable cost savings without jeopardizing the quality of care.

Peri-incisional mezlocillin versus rectal-metronidazole for wound infection prophylaxis.

One hundred and forty patients who underwent appendicectomy were included in a prospective randomized trial to compare the ability of preoperative rectal metronidazole and peri-incisional mezlocillin to prevent wound infection following appendicectomy. The results show that bactericidal local tissue levels of mezlocillin were uniformly achieved using the peri-incisional technique. The wound infection rate for the metronidazole group was found to be 15.9% and did not significantly differ from the wound infection rate when mezlocillin was used (10.4%). Peri-incisional mezlocillin therefore appears to be a viable prophylactic technique against wound infection following appendicectomy and may offer a cheaper alternative to intravenous intra-operative metronidazole administration in cases when pre-operative metronidazole suppositories have been omitted. The peri-incisional mezlocillin technique is also suitable for routine prophylaxis against wound infection following appendicectomy.

A prospective randomized trial to compare triple dose mezlocillin with triple dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

The results of a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare three dose regimens of mezlocillin with cefuroxime plus metronidazole for prophylaxis in emergency and elective colorectal surgery are reported. Severe wound infection occurred in five patients (10%) receiving mezlocillin and in four patients (7%) receiving cefuroxime and metronidazole. There were two episodes of septicaemia, each in the mezlocillin group. The total number of surgically related infections was less with cefuroxime plus metronidazole (n = 10) compared with mezlocillin (n = 17), but this was not statistically significant (P greater than 0.1).

A prospective randomized trial to compare mezlocillin and metronidazole with cefuroxime and metronidazole as prophylaxis in elective colorectal operations.

A prospective randomized trial has compared a broad spectrum ureidopenicillin with a broad spectrum cephalosporin for prophylaxis against the aerobic organisms encountered during elective colonic surgery. Even though only two doses of antibiotics were administered the incidence of severe sepsis was low. Severe wound infection occurred in three of the patients receiving mezlocillin and metronidazole (6 per cent) compared with six in the group receiving cefuroxime and metronidazole (13 per cent). Minor wound sepsis was recorded in 24 per cent of patients receiving mezlocillin and metronidazole compared with only 11 per cent after cefuroxime and metronidazole. There were two episodes of septicaemia, one in each group, and three abscesses, all of which occurred in patients receiving metronidazole and mezlocillin. The total number of surgically related infections was, however, significantly less with cefuroxime and metronidazole (N = 13) compared with mezlocillin and metronidazole (N = 23; P less than 0.03). Escherichia coli was the principal organism responsible for surgically-related postoperative sepsis: (22 isolates: 14 mezlocillin and eight cefuroxime) all of which sensitive to the agents used. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was recovered from 10 patients (three mezlocillin and seven cefuroxime), all of the isolates were resistant to both antibiotics and were associated with severe morbidity. There were 11 isolates of Staphylococcus spp. (nine mezlocillin and two cefuroxime: P less than 0.03). Postoperative diarrhoea occurred in six patients, all were in the group receiving cefuroxime and metronidazole. (Clostridium difficile was recovered from the stool in three of which one was associated with Cl. difficile cytotoxin.)

Single dose mezlocillin versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole for the prophylaxis of wound infection after large bowel surgery.

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in 116 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery to compare single dose prophylaxis with mezlocillin to cefuroxime plus metronidazole in three doses. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of iv mezlocillin (5.0 g) or three doses of iv cefuroxime plus metronidazole at 8-hourly intervals. The first dose was given on the operating table. The overall wound infection rate in the mezlocillin treated patients (n = 54) was 30% and in the patients treated with cefuroxime plus metronidazole (n = 56) 25%. This difference is not statistically significant. When trivial wound infections were disregarded the wound infection rates were 11% and 16% respectively, which again was not statistically significant.

Cesarean section prophylaxis: comparison of two doses with three doses of mezlocillin.

A prospective randomized double-blind comparison of two doses, with three doses of mezlocillin for nonelective cesarean section prophylaxis was performed. One hundred seven (107) patients were evaluated. Mezlocillin (4 g) was given post-cord clamping and then at 4-h intervals for a total of two doses or three doses. The incidence of febrile morbidity was lower in the three-dose group (2 of 46, 4%) than the two-dose group (14 of 61, 23%) (P less than 0.02). However, the incidence of infectious morbidity was not different between the three-dose group (3 of 46, 7%) and the two-dose group (10 of 61, 16%), and the incidence of endomyometritis was similar in the two groups (6.5% vs 9.8%). Among failures of prophylaxis there were no differences compared to successes in the number of potential commensals or potential pathogens cultured from amniotic fluid. However, the proportion of failures among patients with both commensals and potential pathogens isolated (10/58) was significantly greater than among patients with none or only commensals isolated (1/37) (P less than 0.03). We found mezlocillin to be an effective agent for perioperative cesarean section prophylaxis with two doses as effective as three doses. The presence of clinically important organisms in the amniotic fluid at the time of operation typified patients with postoperative infectious complications despite perioperative prophylaxis.

A randomized study of tobramycin plus ticarcillin, tobramycin plus cephalothin and ticarcillin, or tobramycin plus mezlocillin in the treatment of infection in neutropenic patients with malignancies.

Two hundred twenty-five patients with 358 febrile episodes were treated with tobramycin and ticarcillin (TT), tobramycin and mezlocillin (TM), or tobramycin, ticarcillin and cephalothin (TTC). There were no statistically significant differences in the response rates for patients who were proven to have infection (67% with TT, 69% with TTC and 53% with TM). Patients were more often cured of their infection if their neutrophil count rose during therapy. In this study, the addition of cephalothin to TT did not increase the frequency of azotemia (10% and 12%, respectively). Although mezlocillin has a broader spectrum of activity in vitro than ticarcillin, it was not more efficacious when combined with tobramycin than ticarcillin plus tobramycin for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients.

Human intestinal tissue antibiotic concentrations. Clindamycin, gentamicin, and mezlocillin.

An antibiotic, to be effective for prophylaxis in abdominal trauma, should quickly achieve high concentrations in the intestinal wall and at enough inhibitory levels to kill most aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that are potential contaminants at the site of surgical incision. Therefore, we studied the intestinal tissue levels of clindamycin, gentamicin, and mezlocillin to see whether the tissue levels achieved by these antibiotics in the intestinal tissue were adequate. A single dose of mezlocillin, 4 grams; clindamycin, 600 mg and gentamicin, 80 mg; quickly reached the desired concentrations, i.e., 52.3, 9.69 and 6.1 micrograms/gram of intestinal tissue respectively. These levels were high enough to inhibit the growth of most isolates of E. coli and B. fragilis, common pathogens involved in intra-abdominal abscess.