The Intercostal Nerves Transfer to the Radial Nerve Branch to the Long Head Triceps Muscle: Influencing Factor and Outcome of 55 Cases.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to report the functional outcomes and factors affecting the result of intercostal nerves transfer to the radial nerve branch to the long head triceps muscle for restoration of elbow extension in patients with total brachial plexus palsy or C5 to C7 palsy with the loss of triceps muscle function. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with total brachial plexus palsy or C5 to C7 palsy with no triceps muscle function had a reconstruction of elbow extension by transferring the third to fifth intercostal nerves to the radial nerve branch to the long head triceps muscle. The functional outcomes determined by the Medical Research Council grading were evaluated. Factors influencing the outcomes were determined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: At the follow-up of at least 2 years, 36 patients (65%) had antigravity motor function (Medical Research Council grade, ≥3). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the body mass index, time to surgery, and injury of the dominant limb were associated with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The third to fifth intercostal nerves transfer to the radial nerve branch to the long head triceps muscle is an effective procedure to restore elbow extension. We would recommend using 3 intercostal nerves without grafts; in cases of nerve root avulsion in which there is no chance of spontaneous recovery, early surgery should be considered. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) in the nerve roots of C5 to T1 lead to the devastating loss of motor and sensory function in the upper extremity. Free functional gracilis muscle transfer (FFMT) is used to reconstruct elbow and shoulder function in adults with traumatic complete BPIs. The question is whether the gains in ROM and functionality for the patient outweigh the risks of such a large intervention to justify this surgery in these patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After FFMT for adult traumatic complete BPI, what is the functional recovery in terms of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and wrist extension (ROM and muscle grade)? (2) Does the choice of distal insertion affect the functional recovery of the elbow, shoulder, and wrist? (3) Does the choice of nerve source affect elbow flexion and shoulder abduction recovery? (4) What factors are associated with less residual disability? (5) What proportion of flaps have necrosis and do not reinnervate? METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. A total of 180 patients with traumatic BPIs were treated with FFMT between 2010 and 2020, performed by a senior orthopaedic hand surgeon with 14 years of experience in FFMT. We included patients with traumatic complete C5 to T1 BPIs who underwent a gracilis FFMT procedure. Indications were total avulsion injuries and delayed presentation (>6 months after trauma) or after failed primary nerve transfers (>12 months). Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded, leaving 130 patients eligible for this study. The median postoperative follow-up period was 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 33 to 66 months). Most were men (86%; 112 of 130) who had motorcycle collisions (96%; 125 patients) and a median age of 23 years (IQR 19 to 34 years). Orthopaedic surgeons and residents measured joint function at the elbow (flexion), shoulder (abduction), and wrist (extension) in terms of British Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scores and active ROM. A univariate analysis of variance test was used to evaluate these outcomes in terms of differences in distal attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), extensor digitorum communis and extensor pollicis longus (EDC/EPL), the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus (FDP/FPL), and the choice of a phrenic, accessory, or intercostal nerve source. We measured postoperative function with the DASH score and pain at rest with the VAS score. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to investigate what patient and injury factors were associated with less disability. Complications such as flap necrosis, innervation problems, infections, and reoperations were evaluated. RESULTS: The median elbow flexion muscle strength was 3 (IQR 3 to 4) and active ROM was 88° ± 46°. The median shoulder abduction grade was 3 (IQR 2 to 4) and active ROM was 62° ± 42°. However, the choice of distal insertion was not associated with differences in the median wrist extension strength (ECRB: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], EDC/EPL: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], FDP/FPL: 1 [IQR 0 to 2]; p = 0.44) or in ROM (ECRB: 21° ± 19°, EDC/EPL: 21° ± 14°, FDP/FPL: 13° ± 15°; p = 0.69). Furthermore, the choice of nerve source did not affect the mean ROM for elbow flexion (phrenic nerve: 87° ± 46°; accessory nerve: 106° ± 49°; intercostal nerves: 103° ± 50°; p = 0.55). No associations were found with less disability (lower DASH scores): young age (coefficient = 0.28; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.79; p = 0.27), being a woman (coefficient = -9.4; 95% CI -24 to 5.3; p = 0.20), and more postoperative months (coefficient = 0.02; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05]; p = 0.13). The mean postoperative VAS score for pain at rest was 3 ± 2. Flap necrosis occurred in 5% (seven of 130) of all patients, and failed innervation of the gracilis muscle occurred in 4% (five patients). CONCLUSION: FFMT achieves ROM with fair-to-good muscle power of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and overall function for the patient, but does not achieve good wrist function. Meticulous microsurgical skills and extensive rehabilitation training are needed to maximize the result of FFMT. Further technical developments in distal attachment and additional nerve procedures will pave the way for reconstructing a functional limb in patients with a flail upper extremity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Collaboration between the breast and plastic surgeon in restoring sensation after mastectomy.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed invasive cancer in women worldwide. While hypoesthesia is a known sequela after mastectomy, patients are now inquiring with renewed interest about the degree and timing of sensation after mastectomy. This is a topic that has generated much research interest. However, while there have been advances in the field, there are few, well-done studies that allow for an accurate answer to this question. In this article, relevant breast and donor site anatomy is reviewed for sensate autologous breast reconstruction. Additional donor sites apart from the typically utilized abdomen are analyzed with relevant anatomical discussions. Outcomes are presented; however, due to the heterogeneity of the patient population, surgical approach and postoperative sensory testing, it is difficult to compare results between studies. Future directions and unanswered questions regarding sensate autologous breast reconstruction are highlighted. While great strides have been made in providing sensate autologous breast reconstruction, there are still many unanswered questions. Thus, the collaboration between surgical teams and sharing of outcomes is crucial to allow for optimization of this powerful surgical approach.

Intercostal Nerve Transfer in Management of Biceps and Triceps Cocontraction in Spontaneously Recovered Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is caused by traction during birth. Most patients regain useful function with spontaneous recovery. In some cases, cross reinnervation occurs between the biceps and triceps muscles. In these cases, smooth active motion of the elbow joint is impaired by simultaneous biceps and triceps muscle contraction. The biceps and triceps muscle cocontraction could be treated by botulinum toxin type A injection, tendon transfer of the triceps to biceps, and intercostal nerves transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) or to the motor branch of the radial nerve to the triceps muscle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present 16 cases (10 males and 6 females) with biceps and triceps cocontraction in spontaneously recovered obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients. They were treated by 3 intercostal nerves transfer to MCN without exploration of the remaining plexus. The mean age at surgery was 40.6 months (range, 24-65 months). Preoperative electromyography was done in all cases to confirm biceps and triceps cocontraction and to assess the contractile status of both muscles. RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up period was 51.7 months (range, 27-64 months). At the final follow-up, elbow flexion was graded 3 in 1 patient, grade 4 in 3 patients, grade 6 in 9 patients, and grade 7 in 3 patients using the 7-point Toronto scale. The mean active range of motion of the elbow (against gravity) increased from 38 degrees preoperatively (range, 0-75 degrees) to 96.8 °[Combining Ring Above] at the final follow-up (range, 60-140 degrees). CONCLUSIONS: Intercostal nerves transfer to MCN for management of biceps, and triceps cocontraction in spontaneously recovered obstetric brachial plexus injury is a good option with minimal morbidity and high success rate.

Successful Reinnervation of the Diaphragm After Intercostal to Phrenic Nerve Neurotization in Patients With High Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective in this study was to extend diaphragmatic pacing therapy to include paraplegic patients with high cervical spinal cord injuries between C3 and C5. INTRODUCTION: Diaphragmatic pacing has been used in patients experiencing ventilator-dependent respiratory failure due to spinal cord injury as a means to reduce or eliminate the need for mechanical ventilation. However, this technique relies on intact phrenic nerve function. Recently, phrenic nerve reconstruction with intercostal nerve grafting has expanded the indications for diaphragmatic pacing. Our study aimed to evaluate early outcomes and efficacy of intercostal nerve transfer in diaphragmatic pacing. METHODS: Four ventilator-dependent patients with high cervical spinal cord injuries were selected for this study. Each patient demonstrated absence of phrenic nerve function via external neck stimulation and laparoscopic diaphragm mapping. Each patient underwent intercostal to phrenic nerve grafting with implantation of a phrenic nerve pacer. The patients were followed, and ventilator dependence was reassessed at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Our primary outcome was measured by the amount of time our patients tolerated off the ventilator per day. We found that all 4 patients have tolerated paced breathing independent of mechanical ventilation, with 1 patient achieving 24 hours of tracheostomy collar. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, intercostal to phrenic nerve transfer seems to be a promising approach in reducing or eliminating ventilator support in patients with C3 to C5 high spinal cord injury.

Free Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer With and Without Simultaneous Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Nerve for Restoration of Elbow Flexion After Traumatic Adult Brachial Pan-Plexus Injury.

PURPOSE: After complete 5-level root avulsion brachial plexus injury, the free-functioning muscle transfer (FFMT) and the intercostal nerve (ICN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer are 2 potential reconstructive options for restoration of elbow flexion. The aim of this study was to determine if the combination of the gracilis FFMT and the ICN to MCN transfer provides stronger elbow flexion compared with the gracilis FFMT alone. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent the gracilis FFMT only (32 patients) or the gracilis FFMT in addition to the ICN to MCN transfer (33 patients) for elbow flexion after a pan-plexus injury were included. The 2 groups were compared with respect to postoperative elbow flexion strength according to the modified British Medical Research Council grading system as well as preoperative and postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Two subgroup analyses were performed for the British Medical Research Council elbow flexion strength grade: FFMT neurotization (spinal accessory nerve vs ICN) and the attachment of the distal gracilis tendon (biceps tendon vs flexor digitorum profundus/flexor pollicis longus tendon). RESULTS: The proportion of patients reaching the M3/M4 elbow flexion muscle grade were similar in both groups (FFMT vs FFMT + ICN to MCN transfer). Statistically significant improvement in postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was found in the FFMT + ICN to MCN transfer group but not in the FFMT group. There was a significant difference between gracilis to biceps (M3/M4 = 52.6%) and gracilis to FDP/flexor pollicis longus (M3/M4 = 85.2%) tendon attachment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the ICN to MCN transfer associated with the FFMT does not improve the elbow flexion modified British Medical Research Council grade, although better postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were found in this group. The more distal attachment of the gracilis FFMT tendon may play an important role in elbow flexion strength. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Donor nerve sources in free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion in adult brachial plexus injury.

BACKGROUND: With complete plexus injuries or late presentation, free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) becomes the primary option of functional restoration. Our purpose is to review cases over a 10-year period of free functioning gracilis muscle transfer after brachial plexus injury to evaluate the effect of different donor nerves used to reinnervate the FFMT on functional outcome. METHODS: A retrospective study from April 2001 to January 2011 of a single surgeon's practice was undertaken. During this time period 22 patients underwent FFMT at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri for elbow flexion. RESULTS: Thirteen patients for whom FFMT was performed for elbow flexion met all of the requirements for inclusion in this study. Average time from injury to first operation was 12.8 months (range 4-60), and average time from injury to FFMT was 29 months (range 8-68). Average follow-up was 31.8 months (range 11-84). The nerve donors utilized included the distal accessory nerve, intercostal with or without rectus abdominis nerves, medial pectoral nerves, thoracodorsal nerve, and flexor carpi ulnaris fascicle of ulnar nerve. Functional recovery of elbow flexion was measured using the MRC grading system which showed 1 M5/5, 5 M4, 4 M3, and 3 M2 outcomes. CONCLUSION: Intraplexal donor motor nerves if available will provide better transferred muscle function because they are higher quality donors closer to the muscle and can be done in one stage without a nerve graft. Otherwise, intercostal, rectus abdominis, or the distal accessory nerve should be used in a staged fashion. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:377-382, 2017.

Reconstruction of large facial defects using a sensate superficial circumflex iliac perforator flap based on the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves.

Extensive composite facial defects present a surgical challenge because both functional and esthetic results must be considered simultaneously. Free flap transfer is a good option for extensive facial defects. However, the major concern regarding free flap reconstructions of facial defects is the bulkiness of the flaps. The use of a superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) flap, first reported in 2004, has many advantages including the availability of a thin, hairless skin paddle. In addition, the use of a sensate SCIP flap based on the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves has recently been reported, which can potentially contribute to improved quality of life. We present 2 cases of free sensate SCIP flap reconstruction for extensive facial defects after cancer resection. The flaps were successfully transferred for coverage of the defects with acceptable functional and esthetic results. Sensate SCIP flaps provide a good option for the reconstruction of large facial defects because they are thin and hairless and offer an acceptable color match. These sensate flaps based on the branches of the intercostal nerves are easily obtainable, the donor site is in a concealed area, and primary closure is possible.

Versatility of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction.

The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap was first reported in 2004, in which the concept of perforator flap was incorporated into the groin flap. Although a SCIP flap has many advantages, reports on its application to head and neck defects are limited. We present cases of SCIP flap transfer for reconstruction of various types of head and neck defects.Twelve patients underwent reconstruction using the free SCIP flap after tumor ablative surgery in the head and neck region. The flap was elevated based on the perforators of the superficial branch and/or deep branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery. The thickness of the flap was adjusted according to the defect. The Photo Dynamic Eye infrared camera system using indocyanine green was used to detect the location of the perforators preoperatively and to confirm the blood flow after elevation of the flap. The flaps survived completely in all the cases. The mean pedicle length was 7.1 cm (range, 6-9 cm), and the mean flap size was 12.8 × 6.3 cm (range, 4 × 2 to 18 × 8 cm). No vein grafting was necessary in any patient.The advantages of the SCIP flap include 1) low donor-site morbidity; the donor site is in a hairless concealed area, primary donor-site closure is possible, and no muscular dissection is necessary; 2) adjustable thickness of the flap from a superthin flap to a bulky flap; and 3) a long vascular pedicle available.We believe that the SCIP flap will become one of the most versatile options in head and neck reconstruction.

Surgical refinements and sensory recovery of using transverse sensate thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps to resurface ring-avulsed fingers.

To improve the use of thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps in resurfacing ring-avulsed fingers, the relations between the thoracodorsal artery perforators and intercostal nerves were investigated. The surgical refinements, clinical results, and sensory recovery of flaps were presented. Eleven patients with ring-avulsed fingers were reviewed. Separated and conjoint relations were found. Eleven flaps were harvested with 3 refinements. First is the transverse flap design. Second is operating color Doppler sonography to identify the relations. Third is using the conjoint relation to facilitate adequate flap thinning. Four patients had separated relation, and 7 patients had conjoint relation. Only 1 patient showed flap tip necrosis. Two patients with separated relation needed flap debulking. Ten patients acquired protective to normal tactile sensation, and 9 patients gained fair to normal discriminative sensation. The free transverse sensate thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps can be an option in the reconstruction of ring-avulsed fingers.

Intercostal nerve transfer to neurotize the musculocutaneous nerve after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion: a comparison of two, three, and four nerve transfers.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of different numbers of intercostal nerve (ICN) transfers for elbow flexion and to determine whether age, body mass index (BMI), type of injury, and preoperative delay influence the outcomes. From 2004 to 2010, 32 (30 included) consecutive patients underwent ICN transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve following brachial plexus injury. Elbow flexion strength was evaluated according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system. Of nine patients who received two ICN transfers, six (66.7%) recovered with useful elbow flexion compared with 14 of 17 (82.4%) patients who received three ICN transfers. Of the four patients with four ICN transfers, three (75%) achieved useful recovery. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference. There is no significant difference among the outcomes of two, three, and four ICN transfers to the musculocutaneous nerve. Two ICN transfers are sufficient for useful recovery of elbow flexion. Younger patients achieve better results.

Nerve transfers for the upper extremity: new horizons in nerve reconstruction.

Nerve transfers are key components of the surgeon's armamentarium in brachial plexus and complex nerve reconstruction. Advantages of nerve transfers are that nerve regeneration distances are shortened, pure motor or sensory nerve fascicles can be selected as donors, and nerve grafts are generally not required. Similar to the principle of tendon transfers, expendable donor nerves are transferred to denervated nerves with the goal of functional recovery. Transfers may be subdivided into intraplexal, extraplexal, and distal types; each has a unique role in the reconstructive process. A thorough diagnostic workup and intraoperative assessment help guide the surgeon in their use. Nerve transfers have made a positive impact on the outcomes of nerve surgery and are essential tools in complex nerve reconstruction.

Simultaneous intercostal nerve transfers to deltoid and triceps muscle through the posterior approach.

PURPOSE: This study reports the results of restoring the deltoid and triceps functions in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries by simultaneously transferring 4 intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps through the posterior approach. METHODS: Nine patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries underwent spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve combined with transfer of the third and fourth intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve for shoulder reconstruction. Simultaneous transfer of the fifth and sixth intercostal nerves to the radial nerve branch of the triceps was done to restore elbow extension. RESULTS: For shoulder function, 8 patients had M4 recovery and 1 patient had M2 recovery. Average shoulder abduction and external rotation were 69° and 42°, respectively. For elbow extension, 3 patients achieved M3 recovery, 5 patients had M2 recovery, and 1 patient had M1 recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of 2 muscles with intercostal nerves is possible when both muscles act synergistically, such as shoulder abduction and elbow extension. Two intercostal nerves are adequate to transfer for deltoid reconstruction but not enough for elbow extension against gravity. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Nerve Coaptation Improves the Sensory Recovery of the Breast in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Restoring the sensation of the reconstructed breast has increasingly become a goal of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to analyze the sensory recovery of the breast and donor site of innervated compared to noninnervated deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions, to assess associated factors, and to compare the differences between preoperative and postoperative sensation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent innervated or noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction between August of 2016 and August of 2018. Nerve coaptation was performed to the anterior cutaneous branch of the third intercostal nerve. Preoperative and postoperative sensory testing of the breast and donor site was performed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with 94 innervated DIEP flaps and 58 patients with 80 noninnervated DIEP flaps were included. Nerve coaptation was significantly associated with lower mean monofilament values for the breast (-0.48; p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were found for the donor site (-0.16; p = 0.161) of innervated compared to noninnervated DIEP flaps. Factors positively or negatively associated with sensory recovery of the breast and donor site were identified. Preoperative versus postoperative comparison demonstrated significantly superior sensory recovery of the breast in innervated flaps (adjusted difference, -0.48; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction significantly improved the sensory recovery of the breast compared to noninnervated flaps. The sensory recovery of the donor site was not compromised in innervated reconstructions. The results support the role of nerve coaptation in autologous breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Long thoracic nerve neurotization for restoration of shoulder function in C5-7 brachial plexus preganglionic injuries: case report.

C5-7 brachial plexus preganglionic injuries are usually associated with complete paralysis of the long thoracic nerve. This makes it difficult to provide satisfactory shoulder function by neurotizing only the suprascapular nerve, compared with C5 and C6 preganglionic injuries, in which the long thoracic nerve is spared. We present a case report of a 21-year-old man who sustained a C5-7 brachial plexus preganglionic injury and obtained excellent shoulder function by intercostal nerve transfer to the long thoracic nerve in addition to neurotization of the suprascapular nerve. Our report emphasizes the importance of restoring the activity of the long thoracic nerve.

Intercostal nerve transfer for restoration of the diaphragm muscle function after phrenic nerve transfer in total brachial plexus avulsion.

OBJECT: To determine the possibility of innervation of the diaphragm muscle using intercostal nerve after ipsilateral phrenic nerve transfer in total brachial plexus avulsion. METHODS: Bilateral phrenic nerves and the 9th intercostal nerves were observed inside the thorax. The point where the phrenic nerve entered the diaphragm muscle (point A), the point where the 9th intercostal nerve gave rise to the cutaneous branch (point B) and crossed the posterior axillary line (point C) and the point where the posterior axillary line met the insertion of the diaphragm muscle (point D) were identified. The distances between points B and C, points A and C and from points A through D to C were recorded respectively. The 9th intercostal nerve was transferred to the distal stump of the phrenic nerve in one patient after phrenic nerve transfer to avulsed brachial plexus. RESULTS: The mean distances between points B and C, points A and C and from points A through D to C were 12.20 ± 1.04 cm, 10.32 ± 1.02 cm and 16.43 ± 0.91 cm on the right side respectively, 11.78 ± 1.21 cm, 7.77 ± 0.85 cm and 11.74 ± 1.00 cm on the left side respectively. The 9th intercostal nerve was used to innervate the distal stump of the phrenic nerve in one patient after the phrenic nerve transfer to the avulsed brachial plexus. The diaphragm muscle function partially recovered one year after the operation. CONCLUSION: The 9th intercostal nerve can be transferred to the distal stump of the phrenic nerve to restore the diaphragm muscle function according to the anatomical study. The movement of the diaphragm muscle was partially restored in one clinical case.

Comparison of neuropathic pain characteristics associated with total brachial plexus injury before and after surgical repair: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare clinical characteristics of neuropathic pain associated with total brachial plexus injury before and after surgeries and to correlate possible contributing factors concerning to the pain prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with both total brachial plexus injury and neuropathic pain were included. Neuropathic pain was evaluated in terms of pain intensities, symptoms and regions. Pain intensities were evaluated by a visual analogue scale. The Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory questionnaire and body maps were used to compare the pain symptoms and regions. Demographic data, injury and repair information were evaluated to analyze the possible factors influencing the prognosis. RESULTS: The average pain score of all participants was 7.13 ± 2.46 preoperatively and 5.40 ± 2.08 postoperatively. All patients were divided into Pain Relief Group and Pain Aggravation Group. Older age (p = 0.042), machine traction injury (p = 0.019)and nerve transplantation(p = 0.015) seemed to be related with pain aggravation. Paroxysmal pain was aggravated after surgical repairs (p = 0.041), while paresthesia/dysesthesia improved after surgery (p = 0.003). The permanent component of the pain (spontaneous pain) did not show any significant change (p = 0.584). Pain in C5 (p < 0.001) and C6 (p = 0.031) dermatomes got relieved after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the neuropathic pain of most patients with total brachial plexus injury was alleviated after neurosurgery, and the pain prognosis of different symptoms and regions varied after the nerve repair.

Spinal cord repair in adult paraplegic rats: partial restoration of hind limb function.

Complete spinal cord gaps in adult rats were bridged with multiple intercostal nerve grafts that redirected specific pathways from white to gray matter. The grafted area was stabilized with fibrin glue containing acidic fibroblast growth factor and by compressive wiring of posterior spinal processes. Hind limb function improved progressively during the first 6 months, as assessed by two scoring systems. The corticospinal tract regenerated through the grafted area to the lumbar enlargement, as did several bulbospinal pathways. These data suggest a possible repair strategy for spinal cord injury.

Brachial plexus lesions: 10 years of experience in a center for microsurgery in Germany.

AIM: Brachial plexus lesions are commonly associated with complete or partial plegia of affected muscles even after microsurgical treatment. This study provides an overview of strategies and outcomes of 42 patients operated in a center for peripheral nerve surgery in Germany. METHODS: Postsurgically, the patients were followed up and examined for strength in various muscle groups by applying a standard clinical classification (M0-M5). Sensitivity was estimated by differentiation between blunt and sharp touch. The patients were asked via questionnaire about their postsurgical daily life. Most of the patients received a grafting procedure using the sural nerve. Different microsurgical techniques were applied according to the underlying pathology: Intercostal nerve transfer, end-to-side coaptation, and direct grafting to different recipient nerves. RESULTS: Only the 27 patients, who had a follow-up time of at least 36 months, presented a measurable function in the affected extremity. Elbow-flexion was restored in 15 cases. Triceps function was reconstructed in 7 patients of 27. One patient was able to move digits toward the palm without completing a full fist. Ten patients were able to flex the wrist and 4 could extend it. CONCLUSION: The results were estimated as acceptable for biceps reconstruction but poor for the other muscle groups. Some treatment strategies, which are presently under frequent discussion (contralateral C7-transfer, banked autografts, Oberlin procedure), were not applied. However, some of these techniques may provide a key to improve the results.

Phantom Sensation-Underreported Sensory Outcome Following Intercostal-to-Musculocutaneous Nerve Transfer.

BACKGROUND: Intercostal-to-musculocutaneous nerve transfer is commonly performed in patients with brachial plexus avulsion injuries. As techniques have improved since its inception in 1963, most patients now experience some level of motor function improvement of their affected arm. While motor outcomes are well described, there is a paucity of literature describing sensory outcomes. It is thus difficult to gauge surgical success with respect to sensory function, and there is a necessity to share clear expectations with patients regarding intended or unintended postoperative sensation. CASE DESCRIPTION: In this case report, we describe an unintended sensory outcome of this procedure. Three years after the operation, our patient experiences a "phantom sensation" on his chest when he is touched on the lateral forearm in the distribution of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. This outcome can be explained with review of the anatomy before and after the operation. The persistence of this adverse outcome suggests limitations in sensory cortical neuroplasticity. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to be aware of potential sensory complications in intercostal-to-musculocutaneous nerve transfer. Although this complication is known, it is often overlooked and underreported. Complications such as this should be emphasized in order to set expectations for patients and guide evaluation of sensory outcomes in a future study.