Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in Refractory Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C.

BACKGROUND: KRAS G12C is a mutation that occurs in approximately 3 to 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Monotherapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors has yielded only modest efficacy. Combining the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib with panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, may be an effective strategy. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS G12C who had not received previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor to receive sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), sotorasib at a dose of 240 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), or the investigator's choice of trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib (standard care; 54 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Key secondary end points were overall survival and objective response. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range, 0.1 to 13.9), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 6.3) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.8) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab and 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9) in the standard-care group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group as compared with the standard-care group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; P = 0.006), and the hazard ratio in the 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.03). Overall survival data are maturing. The objective response was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3), 5.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 15.7), and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.6) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, and standard-care groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.8%, 30.2%, and 43.1% of patients, respectively. Skin-related toxic effects and hypomagnesemia were the most common adverse events observed with sotorasib-panitumumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 3 trial of a KRAS G12C inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, both doses of sotorasib in combination with panitumumab resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard treatment. Toxic effects were as expected for either agent alone and resulted in few discontinuations of treatment. (Funded by Amgen; CodeBreaK 300 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05198934.).

Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab in Patients With RAF/RAS-Wild-Type Glioblastoma: Results From the Drug Rediscovery Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of malignant primary high-grade brain tumors, predominantly glioblastomas, is poor despite intensive multimodality treatment options. In more than 50% of patients with glioblastomas, potentially targetable mutations are present, including rearrangements, altered splicing, and/or focal amplifications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by signaling through the RAF/RAS pathway. We studied whether treatment with the clinically available anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab provides clinical benefit for patients with RAF/RAS-wild-type (wt) glioblastomas in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). METHODS: Patients with progression of treatment refractory RAF/RASwt glioblastoma were included for treatment with panitumumab in DRUP when measurable according to RANO criteria. The primary endpoints of this study are clinical benefit (CB: defined as confirmed objective response [OR] or stable disease [SD] ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1 in 8 patients had CB in stage 1. RESULTS: Between 03-2018 and 02-2022, 24 evaluable patients were treated. CB was observed in 5 patients (21%), including 2 patients with partial response (8.3%) and 3 patients with SD ≥ 16 weeks (12.5%). After median follow-up of 15 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.7 months (95% CI 1.6-2.1 months) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-8.6 months), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab treatment provides limited CB in patients with recurrent RAF/RASwt glioblastoma precluding further development of this therapeutic strategy.

Risk Evaluation of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Panitumumab-Related Hypomagnesemia in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Hypomagnesemia commonly occurs as a side effect of panitumumab treatment. In severe cases, temporary discontinuation or dose reduction of panitumumab may be necessary. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are reportedly potential risk factors for hypomagnesemia. We conducted a multicenter study to assess the impact of PPIs on the risk of grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving panitumumab. We adjusted for potential bias using a propensity score-matched analysis and retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients. Hypomagnesemia severity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. A total of 165 patients were enrolled in this study. The incidence of grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia was significantly higher in the PPI group than in the non-PPI group, both before (20.0% [30/60] vs. 8.0% [8/105], p = 0.026) and after propensity score matching (16.2% [6/37] vs. 0% [0/37], p = 0.025). In the propensity score-matched cohort, the risk of grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia was significantly higher in the PPI group (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.84; p = 0.025). These findings suggest that concomitant use of PPIs significantly increases the risk of grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia in patients with mCRC receiving panitumumab. Therefore, close monitoring of these patients is imperative.

Phase Ib/II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Binimetinib (MEK162) Plus Panitumumab for Mutant or Wild-Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Activating RAS gene mutations occur in approximately 55% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade resistance. Combined EGFR and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibition may extend response to EGFR inhibition and overcome acquired resistance. This phase Ib/II dose escalation trial evaluated the safety and activity of dual inhibition with binimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) and panitumumab (EGFR inhibitor [EGFRi]) in patients with RAS mutant or BRAF wild type (WT)/RAS WT mCRC. METHODS: Phase Ib dose escalation started with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily plus panitumumab 6 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks. In the phase II study, patients with measurable mCRC were enrolled into 4 groups based on previous anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy and RAS mutational status. RESULTS: No patients in the phase Ib portion (n = 10) had a response; 70% of patients had stable disease. In the phase II portion (n = 43), overall response rate (ORR, confirmed) was 2.3% with one partial response in the RAS WT group, DCR was 30.2%, and median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95%CI, 1.6-3.3). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event, with the most common being diarrhea (71.7%), vomiting (52.8%), nausea (50.9%), fatigue (49.1%), dermatitis acneiform (43.4%), and rash (41.5%). Most patients required treatment interruption or dose reduction due to difficulties tolerating treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of binimetinib and panitumumab had substantial toxicity and limited clinical activity for patients with mutant or WT RAS mCRC, independent of EGFRi treatment history (Trial registration: NCT01927341).

Risk factor analysis for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities in real-world metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies are effective in treating RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, their administration induces skin toxicity, markedly reducing patients' quality of life. This study is aimed at identifying the risk factors associated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities. METHODS: Patients with mCRC (n = 116) who received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was evaluation of the risk factors for grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities during all the treatment periods. Furthermore, factors associated with each grade ≥ 2 skin symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Incidence of total grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity symptoms was 61.2%, and those of grade ≥ 2 rash, dry skin, fissures, and paronychia were 34.5%, 25.9%, 20.7%, and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that liver metastasis was an independent risk factor for overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-6.78; P = 0.02) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics as a preventive factor (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.01-0.91; P = 0.04). For grade ≥ 2 rash, prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics and topical steroid ointment was a preventive factor (OR 0.37; 95%CI 0.16-0.89; P = 0.03). Moreover, liver metastasis (OR 8.37; 95%CI 1.98-35.47; P = 0.004) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03-0.76; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 paronychia. CONCLUSION: Liver metastasis was suggested to be a risk factor for the incidence of overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities; moreover, preemptive systemic antibiotic administration drastically decreased this risk during all periods of anti-EGFR treatment for mCRC.

A comparison of panitumumab and cetuximab in the treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Cetuximab and panitumumab are common antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that can be used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although these two drugs are considered to be very similar, differences in the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and panitumumab are still unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effects and adverse reactions of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang databases to identify records related to the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC. The search terms were "cetuximab," "panitumumab," and "colorectal cancer." The deadline of searching was April 2022. Review manager 5.4 software was used to perform the statistical analysis for this meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OS, PFS, and response rate (RR) between cetuximab arm and panitumumab arm (OS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.81-1.03, p = .14; PFS: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.83-1.02, p = .11; RR: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.96-1.61, p = .14). We also did not observe any statistical difference between both arms in incidence of acneiform rash, severe acneiform rash, diarrhea, and severe diarrhea (acneiform rash: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.84-1.42, p = .51; severe acneiform rash: OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.80-2.81, p = .21; diarrhea: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.82-1.42, p = .58; severe diarrhea: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.44-1.84, p = .77). The incidence of paronychia was decreased in the panitumumab arm, but that of hypomagnesemia and severe hypomagnesemia were decreased in the cetuximab arm. (paronychia: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-1.00, p = .05; hypomagnesemia: OR = 1.85, 95% CI =1.41-2.41, p < .00001; severe hypomagnesemia: OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.52-4.67, p = .0006). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in OS, PFS and RR between the cetuximab arm and panitumumab arm in the treatment of mCRC. For adverse reactions, the incidence of paronychia was decreased in the panitumumab arm, and the incidence of hypomagnesemia was deceased in the cetuximab arm.

Panitumumab vs Bevacizumab Added to Standard First-line Chemotherapy and Overall Survival Among Patients With RAS Wild-type, Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: For patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibodies to first-line doublet chemotherapy is routine, but the optimal targeted therapy has not been defined. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding panitumumab (an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) vs bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) to standard first-line chemotherapy for treatment of RAS wild-type, left-sided, metastatic colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial at 197 sites in Japan in May 2015-January 2022 among 823 patients with chemotherapy-naive RAS wild-type, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (final follow-up, January 14, 2022). Interventions: Panitumumab (n = 411) or bevacizumab (n = 412) plus modified fluorouracil, l-leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) every 14 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point, overall survival, was tested first in participants with left-sided tumors, then in the overall population. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and curative (defined as R0 status) resection rate. Results: In the as-treated population (n = 802; median age, 66 years; 282 [35.2%] women), 604 (75.3%) had left-sided tumors. Median follow-up was 61 months. Median overall survival was 37.9 months with panitumumab vs 34.3 months with bevacizumab in participants with left-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.82; 95.798% CI, 0.68-0.99; P = .03) and 36.2 vs 31.3 months, respectively, in the overall population (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03). Median progression-free survival for panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.9 months, respectively, for those with left-sided tumors (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20) and 12.2 vs 11.4 months overall (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24). Response rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 80.2% vs 68.6%, respectively, for left-sided tumors (difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.4%-17.9%) and 74.9% vs 67.3% overall (difference, 7.7%; 95% CI, 1.5%-13.8%). Median duration of response with panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.2 months for left-sided tumors (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10) and 11.9 vs 10.7 months overall (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06). Curative resection rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 18.3% vs 11.6% for left-sided tumors; (difference, 6.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-12.3%) and 16.5% vs 10.9% overall (difference, 5.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-10.3%). Common treatment-emergent adverse events were acneiform rash (panitumumab: 74.8%; bevacizumab: 3.2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (panitumumab: 70.8%; bevacizumab: 73.7%), and stomatitis (panitumumab: 61.6%; bevacizumab: 40.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding panitumumab, compared with bevacizumab, to standard first-line chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in those with left-sided tumors and in the overall population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02394795.

Panitumumab Associated Acute Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: The addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy in wild-type metastatic colon cancer contributes to survival. While the skin related side effects of panitumumab are well known, we wanted to present a case where it was a possible cause of acute pancreatitis. CASE REPORT: The FOLFOX regimen was started in a 67-year-old patient with sigmoid colon cancer and multiple liver metastases. After 2 cycles, genetic tests were concluded and panitumumab 6 mg/kg was added to the treatment. The patient who presented with abdominal pain 2 days after the treatment was hospitalized with acute pancreaatitis. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Abdominal tomography of the patient was compatible with acute pancreatitis. Oral intake was stopped, IV hydration was started. The patient, whose complaints regressed, was discharged on the 3rd day of hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Skin side effects related to panitumumab are observed quite frequently. Although panitumumab related gastrointestinal side effects have been reported, there is no data on acute pancreatitis. Panitumumab was added to the chemotherapy regimen he received, and it was thought that panitumumab might be the etiological factor in the case who developed pancreatitis.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on the development of hypomagnesemia induced by panitumumab.

Panitumumab, a therapeutic agent for unresectable advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer, is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The onset of hypomagnesemia is a known side effect of anti-EGFR inhibitors, including panitumumab, and it is thought that inhibition of reabsorption of Mg in renal tubules is one of the causes. In addition, recent reports have shown that long-term administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduces serum magnesium levels. Therefore, in this study, 102 patients who received oral PPIs treated with panitumumab were classified into a PPI combination group and a PPI non-combination group, and the effect of PPIs on the development of grade 2 or higher hypomagnesemia was investigated. The incidence of hypomagnesemia in the PPI combination group (46.9%, 15/32) was higher than that in the PPI non-combination group (25.7%, 18/70). A comparison of the backgrounds of the two groups of patients showed a significant difference in serum albumin levels. PPI administration was significantly associated with panitumumab-induced hypomagnesemia development when adjusted for known risk factors, serum albumin level, renal function, and oral magnesium oxide tablets in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (hazard ratio 2.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-4.22; P =0.040). These results indicate that detailed monitoring of serum magnesium levels is recommended for patients treated with panitumumab and co-administration of PPIs.

[Challenge of Skin Treatment Led by Nurses and Pharmacists for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR Antibodies].

Preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists was started for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)who received anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Incidence of skin-related toxicities, amount of topical moisturizers used, and administered cycles of anti-EGFR antibody were retrospectively compared between a preemptive skin treatment group and a control group. Thirty-four mCRC patients before the introduction of preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and 23 mCRC patients treated with preemptive skin treatment led by nurses were evaluated. The incidence of 6- and 12- week Grade 2 or higher skin-related toxicity was 23.5% in the control group and 8.7% in the preemptive group(p=0.18), and 67.7% in the control group and 30.4% in the preemptive group(p=0.0076), respectively. Mean amounts of moisturizer used were both lower in the control group than in the preemptive group at both 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks(6 weeks; 275 g vs 550 g, p=0.036, 7-12 weeks; 575 g vs 1,175 g, p=0.013). However, the amount of topical steroid used was similar in both groups. Preemptive moisturizer skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists may decrease the incidence of skin- related toxicity.

REMARRY and PURSUIT trials: liquid biopsy-guided rechallenge with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with panitumumab plus irinotecan for patients with plasma RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy of rechallenge with anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for patients with RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Moreover, post hoc biomarker analyses of clinical trials has suggested that RAS status in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has a high probability to select patients who could benefit from anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge. METHODS: This trial is composed of 2 phases: a monitoring phase (REMARRY) and a trial phase (PURSUIT). A monitoring phase, the REMARRY study, aims to evaluate the dynamics of plasma RAS status during the subsequent treatments after refractory to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with mCRC with RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type tumors who have progressed after a response to previous anti-EGFR therapy, using a highly sensitive digital polymerase chain reaction OncoBEAM RAS CRC kit in a central laboratory (Sysmex, Japan). A trial phase, the PURSUIT trial, is a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenge therapy with panitumumab plus irinotecan in patients without RAS mutations in ctDNA (plasma RAS negative) in the REMARRY study. Key eligibility criteria of the PURSUIT trial include RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type mCRC in tumor tissue refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; progression after complete or partial response to previous anti-EGFR therapy; plasma RAS negative (defined as plasma mutant allele frequencies [MAF] of all RAS ≤ 0.1%) within 28 days prior to enrollment; 4 months or more between the last administration of previous anti-EGFR mAb and the start of protocol treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) ≤ 1. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR). The target sample size of the PURSUIT trial is 50 patients. Biomarker analyses will be performed in parallel using the OncoBEAM RAS CRC kit and a next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analysis (Guardant360). DISCUSSION: Our trial aims to confirm the clinical benefit of anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge therapy in patients with plasma RAS negative. Moreover, through biomarker analyses, our trial will shed light on which patients would benefit from rechallenge in addition to being plasma RAS negative. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The REMARRY study: UMIN, UMIN000036424 . Registered date: April 5, 2019. The PURSUIT trial: jRCT, jRCTs031190096 . Registered date: October 1, 2019.

Navigating metastatic colorectal treatment options in the USA: a survey of patient acceptance of skin toxicities associated with Vectibix.

PURPOSE: To understand the extent to which metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receive education on the prevention and management associated with skin rash following Vectibix treatment. Furthermore, to investigate how this adverse event affects a patient's quality of life (QoL) and influences their treatment decisions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 200 mCRC patients (100 Vectibix users and 100 Vectibix non-users). After excluding respondents who had used cetuximab, 61 Vectibix users and 56 Vectibix non-users remained. RESULTS: Most Vectibix users (79%) experienced a skin rash in response to treatment of which 65% considered the rash moderate, 27% mild, and 8% severe. Vectibix users generally felt they were adequately informed about the rash (83%), with the most common messages received related to sun protection. However, sunscreen was used by only 42% of patients prior to rash and 60% of patients following the appearance of rash. The use of oral antibiotics was low prior to rash (21%) and following rash (46%). Among patients experiencing a rash within the past week (n=16), 75% reported the rash had a large negative impact on their QoL based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index. CONCLUSION: There was a disconnect between patients feeling they were adequately informed and use of prevention and management strategies such as sun protection. This suggests a gap in patient education and adoption currently exists on management strategies both prior to and following the appearance of rash. Given the negative impact that skin toxicity has on the patient's quality of life, it is essential that patients receive and subsequently utilize all information that can minimize rash severity.

A phase Ib study of a PI3Kinase inhibitor BKM120 in combination with panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer.

Background Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor inhibition (EGFRi) in patients with KRAS wild-type (wt) Colorectal Cancer (CRC) may occur as a result of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. We conducted a study to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and response rate of panitumumab, an EGFRi, plus BKM120, a PI3K inhibitor, in advanced CRC. Methods Patients with chemotherapy refractory KRAS wt CRC, who were EGFRi naive were enrolled. A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was utilized. The starting dose of panitumumab was 6 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks with BKM120 at 60 mg oral daily. Results Nineteen patients were treated and 17 were evaluable for response. The starting dose was not tolerable (mucositis, fatigue). At dose level (DL) 1, three of six patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity, DL - 1 had no significant toxicity. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg iv q 2 weeks with BKM120 60 mg given 5 out of 7 days per week was declared the RP2D. One patient (5.9%) who was PTEN and PIK3CA negative by IHC had a partial response, seven had stable disease, and nine had disease progression. Conclusion Panitumumab (6 mg/kg iv q 2 weeks) with BKM120 60 mg given 5 out of 7 days per week was declared the RP2D. Toxicities including fatigue, rash and mucositis. There was little evidence of activity in this biomarker unselected cohort.

A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus panitumumab in clinical stage III rectal cancer with KRAS wild-type. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II trial. KRAS wild-type clinical stage III rectal cancer patients were enrolled. Patients received 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 with 6 mg/kg panitumumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the response rate (RR) defined by RECIST. Lateral lymph node dissection (LLDN) was performed when patients had a locally advanced tumor < 9 cm from the anal margin. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled. Twelve (24.0%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The RR was 88.0% (complete response 2.0%, partial response 86.0%), which met the primary outcome. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and achieved R0 resection. Seven patients underwent resection of other adjacent organs, and 43 underwent LLND. Twelve patients (24.0%) experienced grade 3-4 postoperative complications, and 4 (8.0%) had pathological complete response (pCR). Thirteen patients (26.0%) had lymph node metastasis. Forty-five patients (90.0%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.0% and 93.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab without radiotherapy resulted in a low pCR rate but a high PR rate, low local recurrence rate, and good long-term outcome, suggesting that this treatment strategy may be a viable option for patients unable or unwilling to receive radiotherapy. The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number 000006039.

Risk factors for developing cardiac toxicities in cancer patients treated with panitumumab combination therapy.

Aim: To evaluate the incidence and risk of cardiac toxicities associated with panitumumab in advanced cancer of Caucasian patients. Materials & methods: The incidence of cardiac toxicity was assessed by simple incidence rates and rates per 100 person-years. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was conducted. Results: Panitumumab-containing therapy significantly increased the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias (p = 0.036), but not for any cardiac event (p = 0.24) or ischemic event (p = 0.087). The absolute rate of developing cardiac arrhythmia was 10.0 events versus 7.5 events per 100 person-years. Pre-existing hypertension (p = 0.033), history of cardiac disease (p = 0.055) or panitumumab usage (p = 0.046) were risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias. Conclusion: The addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy increases the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmia, but not for any cardiac toxicity or ischemic events.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase â ¡ Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin K1 Ointment for Cetuximab or Panitumumab-Induced Acneiform Eruptions-VIKTORIA Study.

PURPOSE: Skin toxicities associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)antibodies, have a profound effect on the continuation of treatment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of vitamin K1(VK1)ointment for acneiform eruptions induced by anti-EGFR antibody treatment. METHODS: The VK1 ointment was applied to one-half of an affected area and placebo ointment was applied to the other half twice a day for 8 weeks, with photography and clinical evaluation being performed every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change of the VK1/placebo ratio for the number of acneiform eruptions counted by an independent dermatologist between the onset and end of the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. The mean VK1/placebo ratio for the number of acneiform eruptions between the onset and end of the treatment period was -0.158±0.680 and 0.146±0.575, respectively, which was not statistically significant(p=0.069). The mean number of acneiform eruptions at each treatment period at the VK1 and placebo application sites was gradually decreased according to the treatment period. CONCLUSION: VK1 ointment was not effective against acneiform eruptions induced by treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab. Reassessment of the VK1 concentration in the ointment and the endpoint of skin lesions is required before designing further studies.

Topical doxycycline foam 4% for prophylactic management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor skin toxicity: an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind clinical study.

PURPOSE: Acneiform rash, a common toxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), can cause patient discomfort, warranting changes in treatment. This study investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a novel doxycycline foam, FDX104 4%, for managing EGFRI-related skin toxicity. METHODS: This was an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects had metastatic colorectal cancer and were being treated with either cetuximab or panitumumab plus chemotherapy. Treatment (twice-daily topical FDX104 4% on one side of the face and vehicle foam on the other for 5 weeks) was initiated 7 ± 3 days prior to EGFRI therapy. Rash severity, safety, and tolerability were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after EGFRI start. RESULTS: The mean maximal rash grade was lower with FDX104 4% vs vehicle, and fewer subjects developed moderate-to-severe (grades 2-3) rash. On the Global Severity Score scale, a statistically significant difference favored FDX104 4% over vehicle (P = .047). Adverse events (AEs) (n = 68) occurred in 20 subjects; most were mild or moderate. The most common AEs were oral mucositis, nausea, and vomiting, common to chemotherapy and EGFRI treatment. Study-drug-related AEs were experienced by five subjects and consisted of mild, local skin reactions. No study-drug-related systemic side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily, topical administration of FDX104 4% as an adjunct to either cetuximab or panitumumab was safe and well tolerated, and appeared to prevent the onset of rash, especially severe rash. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: Trial Registration NCT02239731.

Targeted tumour therapy induced papulopustular rash and other dermatologic side effects: a retrospective study.

Background: Papulopustular rash is the most common cutaneous adverse effect during targeted tumour therapy particularly with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs). Objective: To evaluate the adverse skin reactions, mainly papulopustular rash, caused by targeted tumour therapy. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of patients who were diagnosed papulopustular rash due to targeted chemotherapeutic agents between January 2016 and August 2018. Demographic characteristics of the patients, the type of malignancy, chemotherapeutic agents causing papulopustular rash, clinical features and grade of the rash, treatment modalities used for the rash, other associated cutaneous adverse reactions, and the need for dose-modification or discontinuation of the chemotherapy were recorded. Results: A total of 39 patients (26 males, 13 females) with a median age of 60 (range 32-86) years were included in the study. EGFRIs such as erlotinib, lapatinib, cetuximab, and panitumumab were the main drugs causing papulopustular rash in 2 (5.1%), 3 (7.6%), 18 (46.1%), and 13 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Imatinib, bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, and everolimus in combination with exemestane and goserelin were responsible in three patients. The most commonly affected area was the face (87.1%) followed by the trunk (56.4%), scalp (25.6%), and extremities (23%). The rash was recorded as grade 1, 2, and 3 in 18, 13, and 6 of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 rash was lead to dose interruptions in 5 (12.8%) patients with subsequent reintroduction at a lower dose in 4 (10.2%) of them and discontinuation of the therapy in 1 (2.5%) patient. Pruritus, xerosis, paronychia, increased growth of the eyelashes, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome (HSF), and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) are other skin toxicities associated with the targeted tumour therapy. Conclusions: With the increasing use of targeted therapies, dermatologists are now confronted with extensive spectrum of skin toxicities. Therefore, it is critical for dermatologists to be aware of these toxicities so as to develop the best approach without discontinuation of cancer therapy.

Phase II Study of Panitumumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Small Bowel or Ampulla of Vater.

LESSONS LEARNED: Panitumumab has no clinical activity in metastatic RAS wild-type small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC), possibly due to the foregut and midgut derivation of small bowel and ampulla.These results, along with findings from genomic characterization of SBA, suggest that SBA represents a unique intestinal malignancy and treatments should not be habitually extrapolated from colorectal cancer.Further studies evaluating the benefit of targeted therapies exclusively in SBA and AAC are warranted. BACKGROUND: Given the benefit of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer (CRC), we sought to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab in metastatic RAS wild-type small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC). METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label, single-arm, Bayesian phase II trial. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Panitumumab was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 14 days. RESULTS: Nine patients (male/female 7:2, median age: 61 years [range: 40-74], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 0/1: 2/7) were enrolled from September 2013 to October 2015. One patient had AAC (pancreaticobiliary subtype) and eight patients had SBA (three duodenal, five jejunal/ileal). Acneiform rash was the most common toxicity. The study was stopped early due to futility with no responses, stable disease (SD) in two patients, and progression of disease (PD) in seven patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 5.7 months, respectively. No patients had extended RAS mutations (exons 2/3/4), but two patients had BRAF G469A and one patient had PIK3CA H1074R mutations. CONCLUSION: Panitumumab had no clinically meaningful activity in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type SBA and AAC. Our findings may relate to the primarily midgut and foregut derivation of the small bowel and ampulla.