Reducing radicality in fertility-sparing surgery is associated with improved in vitro fertilization outcome in early-stage cervical cancer: A national retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) aims to achieve oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to radical treatment while preserving fertility and optimizing reproductive results. This study assesses in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer survivors following FSS, comparing radical and non-radical approaches. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from Hungary's National Health Insurance Fund (2004-2022) on patients who underwent IVF treatment following FSS for early-stage cervical cancer at ten Hungarian fertility clinics. Patients were classified into radical and non-radical surgical groups, with the uterine arteries being spared in the non-radical procedures. RStudio (R software version: 4.2.2) was used for statistical analysis. Student's t-test was used to compare group means, and Fisher's exact test was applied to assess independence and distributions between categorical variables, and to estimate odds. RESULTS: The study analyzed data from 122 IVF treatment cycles involving 36 patients. The non-radical group had a significantly higher live birth rate (83%, 5/6 compared to the radical group (17%, 5/30). Additionally, the non-radical group had a significantly higher implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval (37%, 7/19 and 55%, 6/11 respectively) compared to the radical group (8%, 12/148 and 6%, 5/80 respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to evaluate IVF outcomes in young cervical cancer survivors who have undergone FSS. The findings suggest that less radical procedures are associated with significantly better IVF outcomes. These results emphasize the importance of considering oncological safety and reproductive outcomes together when choosing FSS for early-stage cervical cancer patients. It also highlights the reproductive benefits of performing less radical surgery.

Fertility-sparing surgery for patients with stage IC2 or IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma: any evidence of safety?

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the overall survival of patients with stage IC2/IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing fertility-sparing surgery. METHODS: Patients aged <45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with epithelial ovarian carcinoma, who underwent surgical staging and had tumor involving the ovarian surface (IC2), malignant ascites or positive cytology (IC3), were identified in the National Cancer Database. The fertility-sparing surgery group included patients who had preservation of the uterus and the contralateral ovary while the radical surgery group included patients who had hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves while a Cox model was constructed to control for tumor grade and performance of lymphadenectomy. A systematic review of the literature was performed and cumulative relapse rate among patients with IC2/IC3 disease who underwent fertility-sparing surgery was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 235 cases were identified; 105 (44.7%) patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery. There was no difference in overall survival between the fertility-sparing and radical surgery groups (p=0.37; 5- year overall survival rates 90.2% and 85%, respectively). After controlling for tumor grade and performance of lymphadenectomy, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.56, 2.62). A systematic review identified 151 patients with stage IC2/IC3 disease who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Cumulative relapse rate was 19.3% (n=29) while 12 (6.7%) deaths were reported. Median time to recurrence was 19 (range 1-128.5) months. Tumor recurrence involved the ovary exclusively in 42% (11/26) of patients, while 15% (4/26) had a lymph node, 35% (9/26) a pelvic/abdominal, and 8% (2/26) a distant tumor relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with stage IC2/IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival. However, based on a literature review, relapse rate is approximately 20%.

Clinical outcomes and utilization from over a decade of planned oocyte cryopreservation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the clinical experience of patients who have undergone planned oocyte cryopreservation and oocyte thawing and warming? DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. All women who completed planned oocyte cryopreservation at a single large university-affiliated fertility centre between June 2006 and October 2020 were identified, including the subset who returned to use their oocytes. Patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation for medical reasons were excluded. Baseline demographics, oocyte cryopreservation and thawing-warming cycle parameters, and clinical outcomes, were extracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (LBR), and secondary outcomes were cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and CPR and LBR per transfer. Results were stratified by age at time of cryopreservation (<38 and ≥38 years). RESULTS: Of 921 patients who underwent planned oocyte cryopreservation, 68 (7.4%) returned to use their oocytes. Forty-six patients (67.6%) completed at least one embryo transfer. The CPR per transfer was 47.5% and LBR was 39.3%. The cumulative LBR per patient who initiated thawing-warming was 32.4%. Cycle outcomes were not significantly different in patients aged younger than 38 years and those aged 38 years or over. No patient aged 40 years or older (n = 6) was successful with their cryopreserved oocytes. Ten patients (14.7%) who were unsuccessful with their cryopreserved oocytes achieved a live birth using donor oocytes, with most (7/10) of these patients aged 38 years and older. CONCLUSION: Only a small percentage of patients returned to use their oocytes, and 32% of those were able to achieve a live birth.

Number needed to freeze: cumulative live birth rate after fertility preservation in women with endometriosis.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the number of oocytes used affect the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in endometriosis patients who had their oocytes vitrified for fertility preservation? DESIGN: Retrospective observational study including data from 485 women with endometriosis who underwent fertility preservation from January 2007 to July 2018. Survival curves and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyse the CLBR according to the number of vitrified oocytes used. Endometriosis curves were compared with plots developed using elective fertility preservation (EFP) patients as control group. Log-rank, Breslow and Tarone-Ware tests were used to compare the survival curves. RESULTS: The CLBR increased as the number of oocytes used per patient rose, reaching 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.0-99.1%) using 22 oocytes. Higher outcomes were observed in young women (≤35 years old versus >35 years old). In the younger group, the CLBR was 95.4% (95% CI 87.2-103.6%) using approximately 20 oocytes versus 79.6% (95% CI 58.1-101.1%) in older women (log-rank [Mantel-Cox] P = 0.002). The mean age was higher in EFP patients (37.2 ± 4.9 versus 35.7 ± 3.7; P < 0.001). The outcome was better in the endometriosis group as compared with EFP: a CLBR of 89.5% (95% CI 80.0-99.1%) versus 59.9% (95% CI 51.4-68.6%) when 22 oocytes were used (log-rank [Mantel-Cox] P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The probability of live birth increases as the number of oocytes used increases in patients with endometriosis, but better outcomes were observed among young women. The information provided here may be of interest to both patients and treating physicians for counselling purposes.

Fertility preservation and PGT-M in women with familial adenomatous polyposis-associated desmoid tumours.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is ovarian stimulation and pregnancy in women with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)-associated desmoid tumours safe? DESIGN: The study included women with FAP-associated desmoid tumours who underwent fertility treatments at the authors' tertiary medical centre between the years 2011 and 2021. Data were collected from the fertility unit's charts and from the oncological registries. The main outcome measures were the number of vitrified oocytes and embryos, and the number of live births in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) cycles. RESULTS: Overall, 17 women were identified suitable for this study. A total of 117 mature oocytes were vitrified for fertility preservation and 106 embryos were submitted to PGT-M. One patient returned to claim her cryopreserved oocytes, and five patients who underwent PGT-M embryo transfer reported three live births. A statistically significant decrease in selected fertility cycle parameters was observed in one woman who co-administered sorafenib (a multikinase inhibitor) during her first cycles of treatment, as the mean number of oocytes before and after was 2.7 (±1.3) versus 13.2 (±3.3) (P = 0.02), the mean number of metaphase II oocytes was 2.2 (±2.1) versus 7.7 (±2.6) (P = 0.007), and the mean number of two-pronuclei oocytes was 0.5 (±1.1) versus 3.5 (±1.7) (P = 0.09). Three patients had a median desmoid tumour growth on magnetic resonance imaging of 6.2 (2.9-7.2) cm when compared with prior ovarian stimulation imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation for women with desmoid tumours was characterized in some patients with an acceleration in tumour growth, regardless of the use of aromatase inhibitors. The use of sorafenib should be carefully considered during the course of fertility treatment.

Parenthood desire, childbearing plans and oocyte utilization among women who previously underwent planned oocyte cryopreservation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: To examine the motivations, life circumstances and parenthood aspirations of a cohort of women who underwent planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) at a Canadian academic IVF centre. DESIGN: A single-site, cross-sectional, anonymous quantitative study using a study-specific questionnaire administrated via SurveyMonkey®. Of the 224 women who completed at least one POC cycle between 2012 and 2018, 198 were reached by email and invited to participate. RESULTS: Of the 98 (49.5%) questionnaires returned, 86 were fully completed and were analysed. Mean age at first POC cycle was 35.7 ± 2.4 (range 27-43) and at survey was 37.7 ± 2.5 years. At POC, 77% were single and 97.7% childless. At survey, 96% had not attempted to use their cryopreserved oocytes, yet 26 (30%) had tried natural conception or fertility treatments. Of these, three conceived naturally and two by assisted reproduction. Eighty-five per cent expressed a strong motherhood desire and 67.1% indicated that usage of their cryopreserved oocytes was mostly contingent on relationship status. Many expressed a desire for shared genetic parenthood within a committed relationship. Forty-seven per cent did not want to carry a pregnancy beyond the age of 46. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study confirm the central role of age and relationship status in influencing women's POC decisions and oocyte utilization plans. The late age at POC could be explained by women using it toward the end of their peak reproductive years to leverage their remaining chances of genetic motherhood. Surveying women at later points following POC would help to gain a more comprehensive picture of their oocyte utilization and disposition plans.

Educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using ART: a multi-country mixed-methods study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the most pressing educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using assisted reproductive technologies (ART)? DESIGN: This mixed-methods study combined qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys. Participants included physicians and nurses specialized in reproductive endocrinology or in obstetrics/gynaecology, and laboratory specialists, with a minimum of 3 years of experience, practising in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain or the UK. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to ensure a mix of experience and settings. Interviews were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using frequency tables, cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests to compare results by reimbursement context. RESULTS: A total of 535 participants were included (273 physicians, 145 nurses and 117 laboratory specialists). Knowledge gaps, skills gaps and attitude issues were identified in relation to: (i) ovarian stimulation (e.g. knowledge of treatments and instruction protocols for ovarian stimulation), (ii) embryo culture and cryopreservation/vitrification (e.g. diverging opinions on embryo freezing, (iii) embryo assessment (e.g. performing genetic testing), (iv) support of luteal phase and optimizing pregnancy outcomes (e.g. knowledge of assessment methods for endometrial receptivity), and (v) communication with patients (e.g. reluctance to address emotional distress). CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive, exploratory study corroborates previously reported gaps in fertility care and identifies potential causes of these gaps. Findings provide evidence to inform educational programmes for healthcare professionals who use ART in their practice and calls for the development of case-based education and interprofessional training programmes to improve care for patients with fertility issues.

Reproductive functions and fertility preservation in transgender women: a French case series.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The reproductive potential of transgender people may be impaired by gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) and is obviously suppressed by gender-affirming surgery involving bilateral orchiectomy. The evolution of medical support for transgender people has made fertility preservation strategies possible. Fertility preservation in transgender women mainly relies on sperm cryopreservation. There are few studies on this subject, and the sample sizes are small, and so it difficult to know whether fertility preservation procedures are feasible and effective in trans women. DESIGN: This retrospective study reports the management of fertility preservation in transgender women referred to the study centre for sperm cryopreservation, and the semen parameters of trans women were compared with those of sperm donors. RESULTS: Ninety-six per cent of transgender women who had not started treatment benefitted from sperm cryopreservation, compared with 80% of those who attempted a therapeutic window and 50% of those receiving hormonal treatment at the time of sperm collection. No major impairment of semen parameters was observed in transgender women who had not started GAHT compared with sperm donors. However, even though the frequency of oligozoospermia was no different, two transgender women presented azoospermia. Some transgender women who had started GAHT could benefit from sperm freezing. None of them were treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. CONCLUSIONS: Parenthood strategies for transgender people have long been ignored, but this is an important issue to consider, especially because medical treatments and surgeries may be undertaken in adolescents or very young adults. Fertility preservation should ideally be offered prior to initiation of GAHT.

IVF impact on the risk of recurrence of endometrial adenocarcinoma after fertility-sparing management.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do IVF treatments after conservative management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia or grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (AH/EC) increase the risk of disease recurrence? DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study from a national registry from January 2008 to July 2019. Sixty patients had an AH/EC and received progestin treatment using chlormadinone acetate for at least 3 months. After remission, 31 patients underwent IVF and 29 did not. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate at 24 months according to the use of IVF. The secondary outcome was the identification of risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The probability of 2-year recurrence was 37.7% (SD 10.41%) in the IVF group and 55.7% (SD 14.02%) in the no IVF group (P = 0.13). Obesity, nulliparity, polycystic ovary syndrome, age and tumoural characteristics were not associated with recurrence. Pregnancy was a protective factor for recurrence, with 2-year recurrence probabilities of 20.5% and 62.0% in the pregnancy and no pregnancy groups, respectively (P = 0.002, 95% CI 0.06-0.61). In contrast, the number of cycles, maximum serum oestradiol concentration during ovarian stimulation, ovarian stimulation protocol, total dose of gonadotrophin administered and thickness of the endometrium showed no significant differences in terms of the risk of recurrence in the IVF subgroup. CONCLUSION: IVF treatment after fertility-sparing management of AH/EC does not increase the risk of recurrence. Therefore, it is an acceptable strategy to decrease the time to pregnancy. Overall, the recurrence rate is high enough to justify close monitoring once remission occurs.

Oocyte accumulation for fertility preservation in women with benign ovarian tumours with a history of previous surgery, multiple or large cysts.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes and acceptance rates of an oocyte accumulation programme in young women with benign ovarian tumour (BOT)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted at the Academic Assisted Reproductive Technology and Fertility Preservation Centre, Lille University Hospital, between January 2016 and December 2019. The number of metaphase II oocytes per cycle and per patient after accumulation were evaluated. Two groups were identified for the analysis: endometrioma ('endometrioma') and dermoid, mucinous or serous cyst ('other cysts'). RESULTS: A total of 113 fertility-preservation cycles were analysed in 70 women aged 27.9 ± 4.8 years. Almost all women had undergone previous ovarian surgery before fertility preservation (89%). Mean anti-Müllerian hormone levels before ovarian stimulation was 12.5 ± 8.7 pmol/l. A total of 6.4 ± 3.4 oocytes were retrieved, and 4.3 ± 3.4 metaphase II (MII) oocytes were vitrified per cycle. All agreed to the oocyte accumulation programme and all underwent at least one cycle. To date, 36 (51%) patients achieved two or three fertility- preservation cycles. After accumulation, 7.0 ± 5.23 MII oocytes were vitrified per patient. No difference was found in ovarian response and oocyte cohort between the 'endometrioma' and 'other cysts' groups. Questionnaires completed after oocyte retrieval revealed abdominal bloating and pelvic pain in most patients, with no difference according to the type of cyst. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte accumulation should be systematically offered to young women with BOT irrespective of histological type, as it seems to be well-tolerated. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the efficiency of oocyte accumulation to optimize the chances of subsequent pregnancies.

Planned oocyte cryopreservation (Planned OC): systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-efficiency and patients' perspective.

BACKGROUND: Advances in vitrification techniques have enabled planned oocyte cryopreservation ('Planned OC'). OBJECTIVES: To explore the cost-efficiency and utilisation of planned OC, as well as patients' perspectives on the process. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database and PsychINFO, for all relevant studies published between January 2007 and December 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines in PECO format, and was registered with PROSPERO. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers evaluated all manuscripts for inclusion eligibility. Authors were contacted for missing data. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and for heterogeneity. Weighted effects were measured and plotted. MAIN RESULTS: The search yielded 12 545 records, of which 43 were included. Planned OC is cost-efficient at 35, assuming 60% utilisation; and at 37 assuming utilising donor sperm when necessary. At 38 it is cost-efficient to defer planned OC in favour of undergoing 2 IVF cycles. Currently, utilisation of banked-oocytes within 22-58 months, is up to 15%. Nine percent of warmed banked oocytes result in life births. Online resources and treating physicians are equally important sources of information regarding planned OC. Most patients think planned OC is ideal before age 35 and are not fully aware of what the process entails and tend to overestimate the success rates. The main barrier to wider endorsement of planned OC is being wary of potential health implications or of limited success. CONCLUSION: Planned OC is an adequate method for preserving fertility. However, knowledge gaps result in under-utilisation leading to reduced cost-efficiency. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Identifying facilitators and barriers for wider adoption of banking oocytes can enhance the cost-efficiency of this modality.

Real-world anticancer medications for reproductive-age women with breast cancer by using a claims database in Japan.

Aim: To describe real-world breast cancer medications among reproductive-age women. Patients & methods: Using data from a Japanese claims database, anticancer prescriptions were classified into seven categories of amenorrhea risk based on fertility preservation guidelines. Results: We identified 2999 women with records of breast cancer and anticancer prescription from 2005 to 2018. The proportions of prescriptions were as follows: high, 4.1-12.9%; intermediate: 6.0-16.3%; low: 0.4-2.3%; very low/no: 0.3-12.2%; unknown: 33.9-45.5%; unlisted combination: 12.2-23.4%; and unlisted drug: 12.5-26.7%. The common drugs in the unknown category were trastuzumab (n = 1527), docetaxel (n = 1014), and paclitaxel (n = 995). For medications unlisted in the guidelines, various drugs and drug combinations were observed. Conclusion: Numerous anticancer drugs are currently being prescribed with insufficient evidence regarding amenorrhea risk.

Lay abstract The ability to have children for breast cancer patients is one of the key issues of cancer survivorship, especially because recent progress in anticancer treatments has enabled patients to achieve longer survival. The fertility preservation guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2006) introduce some anticancer treatments that carry potential risks to future fertility. In this study, the anticancer prescriptions of 2999 patients with breast cancer aged between 15 and 49 years were examined. Results showed that several medications are prescribed despite the lack of information on the risk of infertility. This suggests that further research is required to fill the evidence gap, and that decision aid through adequate counseling should be undertaken.

Uterine Artery Embolization Compared with High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of uterine artery embolization (UAE) with those of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies from January 2000 to August 2020. Related articles and relevant references of the included studies were also searched. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two researchers independently performed the data selection. We included comparative studies that compared the clinical outcomes of UAE with those of HIFU ablation in women with myomas. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We assessed the study quality using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for evaluating the risk of bias. Two independent researchers performed the article selection according to the screening criteria and rated the quality of evidence for each article. We calculated pooled mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and relative risk (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data. The systematic review registration number is CRD42020199630 on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. A total of 7 articles (5 trials), involving 4592 women with symptomatic uterine myomas, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the HIFU ablation group, the decrease in "uterine fibroid symptom" scores as well as the increase in quality-of-life scores at the time of follow-up were higher in the UAE group, with overall mean difference 19.54 (95% CI, 15.21-23.87; p <.001) and 15.72 (95% CI, 8.30-23.13; p <.001), respectively. The women in the UAE group had a significantly lower reintervention rate (RR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15-0.42; p <.001). The women undergoing UAE had a significantly lower pregnancy rate than those undergoing HIFU ablation (RR 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.45; p = .006). The difference in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p = .53). CONCLUSION: Compared with HIFU ablation, UAE provided more significant alleviation of symptoms and improvement in quality of life, lower postoperative reintervention rate, and lower pregnancy rate for women with uterine myomas. However, we cannot conclude that HIFU ablation is more favorable for desired pregnancy than UAE because of the confounding factors.

The evolving landscape of donor egg treatment: success, women's choice, and anonymity.

PURPOSE: To analyze donor oocyte (DE) data across 6 years for oocyte usage efficiency, trends, and whether changes impacted outcomes. METHODS: From 2014 to 2019, 323 DE embryo transfers were completed in 200 recipients using oocytes derived of 163 donors. We assessed data for oocytes being freshly retrieved (FRESH-EGG) vs. purchased frozen (FROZEN-EGG); embryos transferred fresh (FRESH-ET) vs. frozen (FROZEN-ET); cycles SHARED (two recipients) vs. SOLE (one recipient); single (SET) vs. double (DET) embryo transfers and usage of PGT-A. Primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy plus live birth (OP/LB) rate. RESULTS: A total of 229 FRESH-EGG (70%) and 94 FROZEN-EGG (30%) cycles were completed. Overall, the use of FRESH-EGG yielded a higher OP/LB compared to FROZEN-EGG (49% vs. 30%, p = 0.001); within the FRESH-EGG group, OP/LB was similar when comparing FRESH-ET vs. FROZEN-ET (58% vs. 45%, p = 0.07). Within the FRESH-ET group, those using FRESH-EGG had a higher OP/LB than those using FROZEN-EGG (58% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). SHARED vs. SOLE cycles (p = 0.6), donor age (21-32 years; p = 0.4), and age of intended parents (maternal p = 0.3, paternal p = 0.2) did not significantly impact OP/LB. Notably, the use of PGT-A did not improve odds for an OP/LB (p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: The use of FRESH-EGG with FRESH-ET without PGT-A remains superior to newer DE treatment combinations. Specifically, the use of FROZEN-EGG and PGT-A did not improve outcomes. Although changing DE practices may enhance experience and affordability, patients and providers must appreciate that choices do not always favorably impact success. Additionally, newly available genetic-ancestry testing may pose longer-term ramifications mandating change in treatment and/or counseling.

Staging procedures fail to benefit women with borderline ovarian tumours who want to preserve fertility: a retrospective analysis of 448 cases.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of clinicopathologic factors on the prognosis and fertility outcomes of BOT patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of BOT patients who underwent surgical procedures in West China Second University Hospital from 2008 to 2015. The DFS outcomes, potential prognostic factors and fertility outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-eight patients were included; 52 recurrences were observed. Ninety-two patients undergoing FSS achieved pregnancy. No significant differences in fertility outcomes were found between the staging and unstaged surgery groups. Staging surgery was not an independent prognostic factor for DFS. Laparoscopy resulted in better prognosis than laparotomy in patients with stage I tumours and a desire for fertility preservation. CONCLUSION: Patients with BOT fail to benefit from surgical staging. Laparoscopy is recommended for patients with stage I disease who desire to preserve fertility. Physicians should pay more attention to risk of recurrence in patients who want to preserve fertility.

Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes for fertility-sparing trachelectomy performed for cervical cancer. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective observational study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2011. Women aged ≤45 years with cervical cancer who underwent trachelectomy were included. Annualized hospital surgical volume was defined as the average number of trachelectomies a hospital performed per year in which at least one case was performed. Perioperative outcomes were assessed based on hospital surgical volume in a weighted model, specifically comparing the top-decile centers to the lower volume centers. RESULTS: There were a total of 815 trachelectomies performed at 89 centers, and 76.4% of the trachelectomy-performing centers had a minimum surgical volume of one trachelectomy per year. The top-decile group had a higher rate of lymphadenectomy performance compared to the lower volume group (96.4% versus 82.4%, odds ratio [OR] 5.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.81-11.4, P < 0.001). There was a significant inverse linear association between annualized surgical volume and the number of perioperative complications (P = 0.020). The top-decile group also had a lower rate of perioperative complications (9.7% versus 21.0%, P < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay ≥7 days (2.0% versus 6.5%, P = 0.006) compared to the lower volume group. In a multivariable analysis, the top-decile group had a 65% relative decrease in perioperative complication risk compared to the lower volume group (adjusted-OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.20-0.59, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with cervical cancer is a rare surgical procedure; <90 centers performed this procedure from 2001 to 2011 and most hospitals perform a small number of cases annually. Higher hospital surgical volume for trachelectomy may be associated with reduced perioperative morbidity.

Trends in guideline-adherent fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer before and after the Affordable Care Act.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in guideline-adherent fertility-sparing surgery (GA-FSS) for early-stage cervical cancer relative to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation. METHODS: National Cancer Database patients treated for Stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer from 2004 to 2016 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determined trends in GA-FSS relative to the ACA and identify patient factors independently associated with GA-FSS. RESULTS: Odds of GA-FSS increased in the post- compared to pre-ACA cohort (aOR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.34-2.03). Decreasing age, Asian/Pacific Islander race, higher education and income levels, more recent treatment year, and lower clinical stage were independently associated with increased odds of receiving GA-FSS. In the pre- and post-ACA samples, decreasing age (per 1 year age increase; pre-ACA aOR = 0.87, 95%CI:0.85-0.90; post-ACA aOR = 0.85, 95%CI:0.83-0.87), higher education level (top vs. lowest education quartile; pre-ACA aOR = 2.08, 95%CI:1.19-3.65; post-ACA aOR = 2.00, 95%CI:1.43-2.80), and lower clinical stage (stages IA2 [pre-ACA aOR = 0.19, 95%CI:0.09-0.41; post-ACA aOR = 0.29, 95%CI:0.19-0.45] and IB1 [pre-ACA aOR = 0.06, 95%CI:0.06-0.16; post-ACA aOR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.12-0.20] relative to stage IA1) were independently associated with increased odds of GA-FSS receipt. After the ACA, Asian/Pacific Islander race (aOR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.81-4.36) and more recent treatment year (Spearman's ρ = 0.0348, p-value = 0.008) were also independently associated with increased odds of GA-FSS receipt. When adjusted for the pre- vs. post-ACA treatment periods, Medicaid patients were less likely to undergo GA-FSS than privately-insured patients (aOR = 1.65; 95%CI:1.34-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were more likely to receive GA-FSS post-ACA. Though the proportion of publicly-insured women increased after ACA implementation, women on Medicaid remained less likely to receive GA-FSS than women with private insurance.

Fertility preservation rates among transgender women compared with transgender men receiving comprehensive fertility counselling.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the fertility preservation rate among transgender women who have received professional fertility counselling compared with transgender men? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 56 transgender women and 56 transgender men referred for comprehensive fertility counselling at the Gender Clinic of the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center's Fertility Institute between January 2017 and April 2019. Statistical analyses were performed to compare transgender men with transgender women who preserved fertility and transgender people who preserved fertility and those that did not. RESULTS: The fertility preservation rate of transgender women was significantly higher than that of transgender men (85.7% versus 35.7%, respectively, P < 0.001). The fertility preservation rate among transgender women was associated with being older and not having undergone gender-affirming hormone (GAH) treatment. The fertility preservation rate was higher among adolescent transgender boys compared with adolescent transgender girls (35% versus 6.25%, respectively, P = 0.005). The duration of GAH treatment among the transgender men who preserved fertility was 70 months compared with 18.6 months for transgender women (P = 0.05). All transgender boys opted for oocyte cryopreservation, while half of the transgender men who had not started GAH opted for oocyte cryopreservation, and half of those who had already started on GAH opted for embryo cryopreservation. CONCLUSIONS: High fertility preservation rates among transgender individuals were found after comprehensive fertility counselling. Fertility preservation rates among adults were higher among transgender women compared with transgender men, while the opposite was found in transgender adolescents.

Fertility-related services in pediatric oncology across the cancer continuum: a clinic overview.

PURPOSE: Fertility-related services in pediatric oncology are increasing, but barriers to care remain and few structured programs are described in the literature. Therefore, the study objectives were (1) to characterize fertility-related services in a large pediatric oncology center and (2) to discuss recommendations for fertility-related services across the pediatric cancer continuum. METHODS: Medical records of all cases referred to our Fertility Preservation Clinic within a 3-year period were reviewed, which included 292 patients/survivors with malignant disease. Approximately half (n = 152/292, 52.1%) were cancer patients referred prior to treatment (n = 92/152) or while on active therapy (n = 60/152). The other half (n = 140/292; 47.9%) were survivors who had completed treatment. RESULTS: Referrals more than doubled over 3 years. Most patients referred before treatment were offered and opted for FP (72.8% attempted; 58.9% completed). More male than female patients opted for FP (77.6% vs. 22.4%), but completion rates were higher among females (93.3% vs. 76.9%). Rates of FP before treatment did not increase over time (p = .752). Many patients on-treatment were referred for infertility risk counseling, demonstrating information/support needs in this group. Referred survivors questioned their fertility post-treatment and completed fertility assessments, indicating intact fertility among few (~ 15%). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated the acceptance and increasing need for fertility-related services in pediatric oncology across the cancer continuum, including FP before treatment, counseling during treatment, and fertility assessment in survivorship. Based on our experiences, current recommendations are discussed and include standardized procedures, streamlined referrals, adequate communication/education (of providers and families), and meeting specific needs of young cancer patients/survivors.

Fertility counseling and sperm banking among adolescents and adults treated for cancer with curative intent in a developing country.

PURPOSE: In developing countries, a higher percentage of patients develop cancer at a younger age. Cancer survival rates have significantly improved, highlighting the importance of survivorship programs that address late complications related to cancer itself or its treatment. The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of fertility counseling and sperm banking and related factors among at-risk males newly diagnosed with cancer and planning to receive a potentially curative anticancer therapy. METHODS: Medical records and hospital database of young male patients with newly diagnosed cancers and planned to start chemotherapy were reviewed for fertility counseling and sperm cryopreservation. Additionally, a self-administered questionnaire was utilized. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients, mean age 32.9 (range: 18-53) years, were included. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 59 (31.7%), leukemia 48 (25.8%), and Hodgkin's lymphoma 26 (14.0%) were the most common tumors encountered. A total of 129 (75.0%) respondents received fertility counseling prior to their treatment, and this rate was higher among patients with early-stage disease (82.4% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.038). However, sperm banking was performed by 33.1% of the whole study group but was significantly higher among single patients (53.4% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001), those who had no children (51.8% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001), and among highly educated patients (47.6% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.001). Patients failed to do sperm banking because they were not informed about the risk of infertility (26.2%) or service availability (25.4%). Fear of treatment delay was a reason in 20.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility counseling and sperm banking among cancer patients are not optimal. Many patients failed to do sperm banking because of avoidable reasons. Better communication and patients' education will probably improve the utilization of this vital service.