Combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for melanoma therapy: The more, the better?

The approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and mitogen activated protein kinase inhibitors (MAPKi) in recent years significantly improved the treatment management and survival of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. CPI aim to counter-act receptor-mediated inhibitory effects of tumor cells and immunomodulatory cell types on effector T cells, whereas MAPKi are intended to inhibit tumor cell survival. In agreement with these complementary modes of action preclinical data indicated that the combined application of CPI and MAPKi or their optimal sequencing might provide additional clinical benefit. In this review the rationale and preclinical evidence that support the combined application of MAPKi and CPI either in concurrent or consecutive regimens are presented. Further, we will discuss the results from clinical trials investigating the sequential or combined application of MAPKi and CPI for advanced melanoma patients and their implications for clinical practice. Finally, we outline mechanisms of MAPKi and CPI cross-resistance which limit the efficacy of currently available treatments, as well as combination regimens.

Convergent MAPK pathway alterations mediate acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors in FGFR2 fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is a knowledge gap in understanding mechanisms of resistance to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi) and a need for novel therapeutic strategies to overcome it. We investigated mechanisms of acquired resistance to FGFRi in patients with FGFR2-fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who received FGFRi therapy and underwent tumor and/or cell-free DNA analysis, before and after treatment, was performed. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA samples from a cohort of patients in the phase I trial of futibatinib (NCT02052778) were assessed. FGFR2-BICC1 fusion cell lines were developed and secondary acquired resistance mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were introduced to assess their effect on sensitivity to FGFRi in vitro. RESULTS: On retrospective analysis of 17 patients with repeat sequencing following FGFRi treatment, new FGFR2 mutations were detected in 11 (64.7%) and new alterations in MAPK pathway genes in nine (52.9%) patients, with seven (41.2%) patients developing new alterations in both the FGFR2 and MAPK pathways. In serially collected plasma samples, a patient treated with an irreversible FGFRi tested positive for previously undetected BRAF V600E, NRAS Q61K, NRAS G12C, NRAS G13D and KRAS G12K mutations upon progression. Introduction of a FGFR2-BICC1 fusion into biliary tract cells in vitro sensitized the cells to FGFRi, while concomitant KRAS G12D or BRAF V600E conferred resistance. MEK inhibition was synergistic with FGFRi in vitro. In an in vivo animal model, the combination had antitumor activity in FGFR2 fusions but was not able to overcome KRAS-mediated FGFRi resistance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest convergent genomic evolution in the MAPK pathway may be a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to FGFRi. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02052778. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated tumors and plasma from patients who previously received inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), an important receptor that plays a role in cancer cell growth, especially in tumors with abnormalities in this gene, such as FGFR fusions, where the FGFR gene is fused to another gene, leading to activation of cancer cell growth. We found that patients treated with FGFR inhibitors may develop mutations in other genes such as KRAS, and this can confer resistance to FGFR inhibitors. These findings have several implications for patients with FGFR2 fusion-positive tumors and provide mechanistic insight into emerging MAPK pathway alterations which may serve as a therapeutic vulnerability in the setting of acquired resistance to FGFRi.

Advances in the management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: transforming a life-threatening condition into a potentially treatable disease.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is an infrequent thyroid tumor that usually occurs in elderly patients. There is often a history of previous differentiated thyroid cancer suggesting a biological progression. It is clinically characterized by a locally invasive cervical mass of rapid onset. Metastases are found at diagnosis in 50% of patients. Due to its adverse prognosis, a prompt diagnosis is crucial. In patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, multimodal therapy (chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy) has yielded poor outcomes with 12-month overall survival of less than 20%. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the oncogenic pathways of ATC, leading to the identification of BRAF V600E mutations as the driver oncogene in nearly 40% of cases. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) and MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) showed outstanding response rates in BRAF-mutated ATC and is now considered the standard of care in this setting. Recently, it was shown that neoadjuvant use of DT followed by surgery achieved 24-month overall survival rates of 80%. Although these approaches have changed the management of ATC, effective therapies are still needed for patients with BRAF wild-type ATC, and high-quality evidence is lacking for most aspects of this neoplasia. Additionally, in real-world settings, timely access to multidisciplinary care, molecular testing, and targeted therapies continues to be a challenge. Health policies are warranted to ensure specialized treatment for ATC.The expanding knowledge of ATC´s molecular biology, in addition to the ongoing clinical trials provides hope for the development of further therapeutic options.

A Real-World Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Reliability of Cetuximab plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal maintenance therapy for rat sarcoma (RAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) remains unclear. It is critical to evaluate the reliability of cetuximab-capecitabine (the observation group) relative to capecitabine alone (control group). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients with RAS and BRAF mCRC admitted to Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, between January 2016 and October 2020 were enrolled and treated with cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as an initial therapy. Patients whose disease was controlled after at least six cycles of treatment were administered a maintenance therapy until disease progression. We also analyzed the prognosis of patients according to clinicopathological features. Altogether, 39 RAS and BRAF mCRC patients were recruited from January 2016 to October 2020, with 18 cases in the treatment group and 21 cases in the control group. The difference in baseline clinicopathological features between the two treatments is not obvious. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival after maintenance treatment in observation group (9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.4-12.6]), was significantly better than the control group (7.3 months [95% CI = 5.8-8.8]). During maintenance treatment, there were no deaths caused by treatment-related adverse events, and the overall incidence of rash acne was different between the observation and control groups (p < 0.05). Most adverse events were mild and easily controlled. Primary tumor site, baseline carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and microsatellite instability status were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy using cetuximab plus capecitabine improved survival in patients with mCRC and was well tolerated by patients.

Chemotherapy in Cutaneous Melanoma: Is There Still a Role?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the preceding decade, the management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma has been revolutionised with the development of highly effective therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (specifically CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) and targeted therapies (BRAF and MEK inhibitors). The role of chemotherapy in the contemporary management of melanoma is undefined. RECENT FINDINGS: Extended analyses highlight substantially improved 5-year survival rates of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with first-line therapies. However, most patients will progress on these first-line treatments. Sequencing of chemotherapy following failure of targeted and immunotherapies is associated with low objective response rates and short progression-free survival, and thus, meaningful benefits to patients are minimal. Chemotherapy has limited utility in the contemporary management of cutaneous melanoma (with a few exceptions, discussed herein) and should not be the standard treatment sequence following failure of first-line therapies. Instead, enrolment onto clinical trials should be standard-of-care in these patients.

Sequencing Targeted and Immune Therapy in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: Lessons Learned.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment strategy for BRAF-mutated melanoma remains unsatisfactory, although the advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma. This article reports current evidence on the efficacy and safety of sequential immunotherapy with targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. It discusses criteria for the use of available options in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Targeted therapy provides rapid disease control in a relatively high proportion of patients, although the development of secondary resistance limits the duration of responses; in contrast, immunotherapy may induce slow but more durable responses in a subset of patients. Therefore, the identification of a combination strategy for the use of these therapies seems a promising perspective. Currently, inconsistent data have been obtained, but most studies indicate that the administration of BRAFi/MEKi prior to immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. On the contrary, several clinical and real-life studies suggest that frontline immunotherapy with subsequent targeted therapy may be associated with better tumor control than immunotherapy alone. Larger clinical studies are ongoing to confirm the efficacy and safety of this sequencing strategy for treating BRAF-mutated melanoma with immunotherapy followed by targeted therapy.

[Updated AWMF Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Langerhans cell Histiocytosis in Children and Adolescents]. / Aktualisierte AWMF Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Langerhanszell Histiozytose (LCH) im Kindes- und Jugendalter.

Langerhans cell Histiocytosis is a rare neoplastic disease, which occurs mainly in children and adolescents. The disease may affect any organ, and therefore, the clinical symptoms vary widely. Some patients have a spontaneous remission of the disease, whereas others experience a rapid and potentially lethal clinical course. The therapeutic approach depends on the extent of the disease, and reaches from a watch-and-wait strategy to chemotherapy with the standard drugs vinblastine and prednisone. The identification of mutations in the MAPK-pathway resulted in growing interest in targeted therapy using compounds such as the BRAF inhibitors. Chronic relapses and permanent sequelae are important problems of LCH and are the focus of current research.

Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted treatment in combination as adjuvant treatment of patient with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted treatments have improved the health outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma. However, due to the high cost of novel therapies, it is crucial to evaluate their value by considering both effectiveness and cost. To compare the cost-effectiveness of these novel agents (atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib, vemurafenib-plus-cobimetinib, dabrafenib-plus-trametinib, and encorafenib-plus-binimetinib) for first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600 mutation. METHODS: A patient-level model was developed to project the health outcomes of 4 strategies for patients with advanced melanoma. We estimated transition probabilities from the IMspire150 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02908672), COMBI-AD (NCT01682083), and COLUMBUS (NCT01909453) trials using a parametric survival model. All health outcomes, including direct cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were estimated from the US payer perspective. Lifetime cost, QALYs, life-years (LYs), and ICERs were calculated. Univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness, along with multiple scenario analyses. RESULTS: Of the 4 competing strategies, atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib produced the best health outcomes, and the vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategy was the least expensive option. Atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib, dabrafenib-plus-trametinib, and vemurafenib-cobimetinib formed the cost-effective frontier, indicating that the ordered ICERs were $325,113/QALYs for dabrafenib-plus-trametinib vs. vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategies and $2,247,500/QALYs for atezolizumab-vemurafenib-cobimetinib vs. dabrafenib-plus-trametinib strategies. Encorafenib-plus-binimetinib was dominated by the other 3 competing strategies. The drug price and first-line utility significantly influenced the model utcomes. CONCLUSIONS: For BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma, the vemurafenib-cobimetinib strategy could be considered the most cost-effective treatment at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000.

Genetic determinants of lung cancer: Understanding the oncogenic potential of somatic missense mutations.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of lung cancer is getting more personalized nowadays and medical practitioners are moving away from conventional histology-driven empirical treatments, platinum-based chemotherapy, and other invasive surgical resections and have started adopting alternate therapies in which therapeutic targets are patient's molecular oncogenic drivers. AIM: The aim of the current study is to extract meaningful information from the online somatic mutation data (retrieved from cBioPortal) of 16 most significantly mutated oncogenes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), namely EGFR, NRAS, KRAS, HER2 (ERBB2), RET, MET, ROS1, FGFR1, BRAF, AKT1, MEK1 (MAP2K1), PIK3CA, PTEN, DDR2, LKB1 (STK11) and ALK, for improving our understanding of the pathobiology of the lung cancer that can aid decision-making on critical clinical and therapeutic considerations. METHODS: Using an integrated approach comprising 4 steps, the oncogenic potential of 661 missense non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in 16 genes was ascertained using 2059 NSCLC (1575 lung adenocarcinomas, 484 lung squamous cell carcinomas) patients' online mutation data. The steps used comprise sequence/structure homology-based prediction, scoring of conservation of mutated residues and positions, prediction of resulting molecular and functional consequences using machine-learning and structure-guided approach. RESULTS: Out of a total of 661 nsSNPs analyzed, a set of 29 nsSNPs has been identified as conserved high confidence mutations in 10 of 16 genes relevant to the under study. Out of 29 conserved high confidence nsSNPs, 4 nsSNPs (EGFR N1094Y, BRAF M620I, DDR2 R307L, ALK P1350T) have been found to be putative novel rare genetic markers for NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: The current study, the first of its kind, has provided a list of deleterious non-synonymous somatic mutations in a selected pool of oncogenes that can be considered as a promising target for future drug design and therapy for patients with lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.

[Clinical and molecular characteristics and prognosis of classical hairy cell leukemia and hairy cell leukemia variant].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment response, and outcomes in patients with classical hairy cell leukemia (cHCL) and HCL variant (HCL-V). Methods: This is a retrospective case series study. Between January 2011 and December 2021, clinical data of 30 patients newly with diagnosed HCL at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were analyzed. The main outcome measures include clinical characteristics, treatment efficacy and survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results: Twenty-one cases of cHCL and 9 cases of HCL-v were included. The median age at diagnosis was 55.5 (range, 30-86) years, with the ratio of male to female 2.75∶1. The main clinical manifestations included fatigue in 11 cases (36.7%), abdominal distension in 7 cases (23.3%), and infection in 4 cases, while 8 cases were asymptomatic. Splenomegaly was reported in 24 cases (80.0%), including 7 (23.3%) with megalosplenia. The white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, and the proportion of peripheral hairy cells in HCL-v group were significantly higher than those in cHCL group, whereas the development of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and monocytopenia in cHCL group was more remarkable than that in HCL-v group (all P<0.05). The BRAF-V600E gene mutation was detected only in cHCL patients (11/14 vs. 0/9, P<0.001). In terms of immunophenotype, the expression of CD25, CD103, CD123 and CD200 in cHCL group (20/20, 20/20, 4/7, 7/17) were all stronger than those in HCL-v group (3/9, 7/9, 0/4, 2/8). Twenty-two patients were treated, of which 13 cases (12 cases of cHCL and 1 case of HCL-v) with cladribine, and 9 cases (4 cHCL and 5 HCL-v) with interferon. Complete remission rate and overall response rate were comparable between cladribine and interferon treatment groups (both P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 31 (range, 1-125) months, and the median overall survival (OS) of the entire group was 125 months. The 5-year OS rate in HCL-v patients represented a trend of inferior (50.0% vs. 95.0%, P=0.207). Conclusions: The clinical features of HCL are unspecific, which includes fatigue, splenomegaly and recurrent infection. The clinical features, immunophenotype, treatment response and prognosis of HCL-v are different from those of cHCL. BRAF-V600E gene mutation is suggested as a key marker for differential diagnosis. Cladribine is recommended as front-line regimen of cHCL patients with satisfactory efficacy and prognosis. Conversely, response and clinical outcome in HCL-v patients still need to be improved.

From a mutation to a drug / Od mutacji do leku.

Malignant melanoma is a dangerous skin cancer, accounting for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. Many patients with this cancer have the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. This mutation causes constitutive activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, significantly contributing to the process of carcinogenesis. We discuss the drug design process on the example of a specific BRAF V600E inhibitor, vemurafenib. We begin with the most commonly used drug design methods. The second part of the article focuses on vemurafenib. We analyze the invention of this BRAF V600E inhibitor and its analogue as well as the course of three stages of clinical trials. Then we provide information about other popular drugs for malignant melanoma, i.e. dacarbazine, ipilimumab and dabrafenib, and about the advantages of therapy with the simultaneous use of two inhibitors. Finally, we briefly discuss the role of artificial intelligence in the future of drug design.

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in children with cardiofaciocutanous syndrome: Clinical presentation and associations with genotype.

Gene variants that dysregulate signaling through the RAS-MAPK pathway cause cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFCS), a rare multi-system disorder. Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) and other forms of epilepsy are among the most serious complications. To investigate clinical presentation, treatment outcomes, and genotype-phenotype associations in CFCS patients with IESS, molecular genetics and clinical neurological history were reviewed across two large clinical research cohorts (n = 180). IESS presented in 18/180 (10%) cases, including 16 patients with BRAF variants and 2 with MAP2K1 variants. Among IESS patients with BRAF variants, 16/16 (100%) had sequence changes affecting the protein kinase domain (exons 11-16), although only 57% of total BRAF variants occurred in this domain. Clinical onset of spasms occurred at a median age of 5.4 months (range: 1-24 months). Among 13/18 patients whose IESS resolved with anti-seizure medications, 10 were treated with ACTH and/or vigabatrin. A substantial majority of CFCS patients with IESS subsequently developed other epilepsy types (16/18; 89%). In terms of neurodevelopmental outcomes, gross motor function and verbal communication were more limited in patients with a history of IESS compared to those without IESS. These findings can inform clinical neurological care guidelines for CFCS and development of relevant pre-clinical models for severe epilepsy phenotypes.

Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with Thymic Involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) with thymic involvement. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively described the clinical, biological, and imaging characteristics of a series of 19 patients with pediatric LCH with thymic involvement in our center between September 2016 and December 2019. We further analyzed the treatment response and outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapy. RESULTS: Thymic involvement was found in 4.4% of a 433-consecutive pediatric LCH cohort; all LCH-thymic involvement presented with multisystem disease. Patients with thymic involvement were typically younger, harboring more lung and thyroid involvement and less bone involvement than those without thymic involvement. Most patients with thymic involvement had alteration of immunocompetence with decreased numbers of T-lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulin G levels. Overall, 47.1% of patients demonstrated a response after 6 weeks of induction therapy, and 92.3% of the patients who did not respond to the first-line treatment had resolution of thymus after the second-line and/or targeted therapy. The progression/relapse rate showed no difference between patients who shifted to second-line therapy and those to dabrafenib (33.3% vs 25%, P = 1.000). The survival for patients with thymic involvement did not differ from those without thymic involvement. More patients treated with second-line chemotherapy had severe adverse events than those given dabrafenib (88.9% vs 0, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Thymic involvement was observed rarely in LCH and had specific clinical characteristics. Chemotherapy could resolve most thymic lesions, and BRAF inhibitors might provide a promising treatment option with less toxicity for infants with BRAF-V600E mutation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2000030457 (BCH-LCH 2014 study); ChiCTR2000032844 (dabrafenib study).

Clinical features of acute kidney injury in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to characterize the incidence, risk factors and clinical features of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining the kidney outcomes of patients in a large healthcare system who received dabrafenib/trametinib between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome was AKI, defined as a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline within a 12-month study period. AKI severity and etiology was determined for each case by chart review. Logistic regression was used to evaluate baseline predictors of AKI. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients who received dabrafenib in our healthcare system from 2010 to 2019 were included in the analysis. Forty-two patients (21%) experienced AKI within 12 months; 10 patients (5% of the total cohort, 24% of AKI patients) experienced AKI occurring during a dabrafenib/trametinib-induced febrile syndrome characterized by fever, chills, gastrointestinal symptoms and elevated liver enzymes. Preexisting liver disease was the only significant predictor of AKI in the cohort. One patient had biopsy-proven granulomatous acute interstitial nephritis that resolved with corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists and nephrologists should be aware that AKI is common after dabrafenib/trametinib and a substantial number of cases occur in the setting of treatment-induced pyrexia.

A multicenter study of skin toxicity management in patients with left-sided, RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line anti-EGFR-based doublet regimen: is there room for improvement?

BACKGROUND: Skin toxicity in patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is well known. However, ad hoc ESMO guidelines have only recently been published. AIM AND METHODS: To describe the management (pre-emptive or reactive) of anti-EGFR-related cutaneous adverse events (AEs), in a real-life clinical context, in a selected population of patients with left-sided, metastatic RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (i.e., panitumumab or cetuximab) as first-line regimen at 22 Institutions. The measured clinical outcomes were treatment-related adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 515 patients included in the analysis, 173 (33.6%) received a pre-emptive and 342 (66.4%) a reactive treatment. The median follow-up period for the overall population was 30.0 months. A significantly lower incidence of any grade acneiform rash was found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort both in the overall population (78.6% vs 94.4%, p < 0.001) and in patients treated with panitumumab (76.1% vs 93.7%, p < 0.001) or cetuximab (83.3% vs 95.4%, p = 0.004), respectively. A lower incidence of any grade (41.6% vs 50.9%, p = 0.047) but a higher incidence of G3-G4 (9.2% vs 4.7%, p = 0.042) paronychia/nail disorders were found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort. Nevertheless, a lower rate of patients within the reactive compared to the pre-emptive cohort was referred to dermatological counseling (21.4% vs 15.3%, respectively, p = 0.001). A higher rate of anti-EGFR therapy modification was needed in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort (35.9% vs 41.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). The pre-emptive approach did not reduce the efficacy of antineoplastic therapy compared to the reactive in terms of ORR (69.2% vs 72.8%), median PFS (12.3 vs 13.0 months), and median OS (28.8 vs 33.5 months). CONCLUSION: Although recommended by international guidelines, the pre-emptive approach of anti-EGFR-related skin toxicity in mCRC patients still appears less adopted in daily clinical practice, compared to the reactive one. A wider reception and application of this indication is desirable to improve patients' quality of life without compromising the continuity and efficacy of antineoplastic therapy.

Acneiform eruptions with combination targeted cancer therapy in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) can be used with pathway inhibitors, including mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors (MEKIs), BRAF inhibitors (BRAFIs), and checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) to treat colorectal cancer. These can precipitate treatment-resistant acneiform eruptions, prompting dose modification or discontinuation. Predicting the likelihood of severe rash development and crafting effective treatments may promote adherence to life-saving chemotherapy. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review of patients with colorectal cancer treated with EGFRI or MEKI in combination with HER2, BRAF, PI3K, or checkpoint inhibitors between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, was performed. Surrogates for rash severity were investigated, including lower extremity involvement, utilization of oral steroids or retinoids, dose modification, and incidence of superinfection. RESULTS: Of 122 patients treated with combination therapy, 105 developed a rash, and 87 developed an acneiform eruption. Common combinations included MEKI/PD-LI, EGFRI/MEKI, and MEKI/PD-1I. Patients treated with EGFRI/MEKI developed the most severe rashes (p = 0.02). Lower extremity involvement was more frequent with EGFRI/MEKI compared to alternative combinations (p = 0.05). Drug holiday correlated with all rash severity surrogates, including rash grade, lower extremity involvement, oral steroid or retinoid use, and incidence of superinfection. Use of oral steroids or retinoids was associated with development of superinfection (p = 0.002). Prophylactic tetracycline use did not impact rash severity or rash incidence. CONCLUSION: This is the first descriptive analysis to characterize acneiform eruptions for patients with colorectal cancer on combination cancer therapy. Approximately 85% of patients developed a cutaneous toxicity with what appears to be synergistic effects of EGFRI and MEKI combination therapy causing the most severe eruptions. Superinfection rate correlated to systemic therapy use beyond oral tetracyclines. Further investigation into the utility of prophylactic oral tetracyclines in this population is needed.

Interstitial lung disease associated with combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated poorly differentiated thyroid cancer: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is the most common malignancy of the endocrine system, accounting for ~ 5% of all thyroid nodules and 1% of all systemic malignancies. BRAF mutations, primarily p.V600E hot spot mutations, are found in 60 - 70% of papillary thyroid cancer cases (PTC) and in 33 - 40% of fatal anaplastic thyroid cancers (ATC), also called poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. Dabrafenib was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 to be applied in combination with trametinib for unresectable advanced or metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer harboring the BRAFV600E mutation. Unfortunately, there are few reports on the pathophysiology, molecular mechanism, and risk factors of interstitial lung disease induced by combined BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We treated a 73-year-old man with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated poorly differentiated thyroid cancer using the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib. Although a significant morphologic tumor response was observed in our patient using combined BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy, he presented with non-febrile respiratory failure, and his chest computed tomography (CT) revealed bilateral reticulation and pleural effusion. Withdrawal from dabrafenib-trametinib and administration of methylprednisolone rapidly improved his respiratory status and imaging features. CONCLUSION: The mechanisms of lung disease after the combined treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib are unclear. We hypothesized that dual-targeted therapy with a BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib, and a MEK inhibitor, trametinib, might prevent the regeneration and proliferation of fibrotic epithelium in lung disease by blocking downstream proliferative signals.

Carotenoids from Marine Microalgae as Antimelanoma Agents.

Melanoma cells are highly invasive and metastatic tumor cells and commonly express molecular alterations that contribute to multidrug resistance (e.g., BRAFV600E mutation). Conventional treatment is not effective in a long term, requiring an exhaustive search for new alternatives. Recently, carotenoids from microalgae have been investigated as adjuvant in antimelanoma therapy due to their safety and acceptable clinical tolerability. Many of them are currently used as food supplements. In this review, we have compiled several studies that show microalgal carotenoids inhibit cell proliferation, cell migration and invasion, as well as induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in various melanoma cell lines. MAPK and NF-ĸB pathway, MMP and apoptotic factors are frequently affected after exposure to microalgal carotenoids. Fucoxanthin, astaxanthin and zeaxanthin are the main carotenoids investigated, in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models. Preclinical data indicate these compounds exhibit direct antimelanoma effect but are also capable of restoring melanoma cells sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy (e.g., vemurafenib and dacarbazine).

A Perspective Study on the RTK, PI3K, B-Raf, CDK and the Multi-Protein Targeting in Medicinal Chemistry.

The cellular signaling pathway components that control the different stages of cell maturation such as RTK, PI3K, B-Raf, and CDK represent crucial antitumor drug targets. The isoform diversity of these components revealed multi-divergent vents for cancer cells to develop several resistance mechanisms against these new selective drug targets. This review article illustrates the complex nature of cancer, moreover, molecular tracing of tumor resistance towards certain signaling pathways was presented. Several crucial interventions in this regard for antitumor agents' development were pointed out. The antitumor activities of several cancer chemotherapies targeting kinases were also discussed with a special focus on the structural bases for the design of protein kinase inhibitors. Additionally, a focused literature survey about the various targeted multi-kinase inhibition approaches as a mean to overcome cancer resistance was also included.

[Induction of Uveitis by Immune-Oncologic Therapies, Namely Checkpoint Inhibitors]. / Uveitisinduktion durch immunonkologische Therapien, speziell Checkpoint-Inhibitoren.

BACKGROUND: The recently introduced tumor therapies including immune checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (ICI) have substantially contributed to survival and quality of life of the affected patients, but are associated with class-specific, non-toxic immune-related side effects including uveitis. This narrative review focusses to summarize the immune-related adverse event profile associated with the use of ICI. METHODS: A literature search in PubMed, the publication database of the National Institute of Health in the USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) used the search terms "uveitis" AND "drug-induced" AND/OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor". All articles published in the last five years and the for the purpose of this review relevant cross references were evaluated. RESULTS: A class-specific phenomenon of ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is their capability to induce systemic and ocular autoimmunity. Ocular side effects are observed in up to 3% of patients and should be differentiated from toxic side effects, since this is not dose-dependent. Melanoma as underlying disease and Pembrolizumab as ICI significantly increase the risk. If timely recognized, systemic treatment with corticosteroids allows to preserve vision without cessation of the tumor treatment in more than 90% of these potentially life-threatening instances. CONCLUSION: Given their impact onto the survival of cancer and namely melanoma patients, ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are increasingly used alone and in combination, which enhances their inherent risk of developing drug-induced ocular autoimmunity. Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.