A phase 3 randomized trial of mavorixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, for WHIM syndrome.

ABSTRACT: We investigated efficacy and safety of mavorixafor, an oral CXCR4 antagonist, in participants with warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome, a rare immunodeficiency caused by CXCR4 gain-of-function variants. This randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled participants aged ≥12 years with WHIM syndrome and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤0.4 × 103/µL. Participants received once-daily mavorixafor or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was time (hours) above ANC threshold ≥0.5 × 103/µL (TATANC; over 24 hours). Secondary end points included TAT absolute lymphocyte count ≥1.0 × 103/µL (TATALC; over 24 hours); absolute changes in white blood cell (WBC), ANC, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) from baseline; annualized infection rate; infection duration; and total infection score (combined infection number/severity). In 31 participants (mavorixafor, n = 14; placebo, n = 17), mavorixafor least squares (LS) mean TATANC was 15.0 hours and 2.8 hours for placebo (P < .001). Mavorixafor LS mean TATALC was 15.8 hours and 4.6 hours for placebo (P < .001). Annualized infection rates were 60% lower with mavorixafor vs placebo (LS mean 1.7 vs 4.2; nominal P = .007), and total infection scores were 40% lower (7.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-13.2] vs 12.3 [95% CI, 7.2-17.3]). Treatment with mavorixafor reduced infection frequency, severity, duration, and antibiotic use. No discontinuations occurred due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); no related serious TEAEs were observed. Overall, mavorixafor treatment demonstrated significant increases in LS mean TATANC and TATALC, reduced infection frequency, severity/duration, and was well tolerated. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03995108.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for advanced endometrial cancer after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced endometrial cancer who had previously received at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg, administered orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy of the treating physician's choice (doxorubicin at 60 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered intravenously every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel at 80 mg per square meter, administered intravenously weekly [with a cycle of 3 weeks on and 1 week off]). The two primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed on blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival. The end points were evaluated in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease and in all patients. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 827 patients (697 with pMMR disease and 130 with mismatch repair-deficient disease) were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (411 patients) or chemotherapy (416 patients). The median progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 6.6 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.72; P<0.001; overall: 7.2 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.66; P<0.001). The median overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 17.4 vs. 12.0 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; P<0.001; overall: 18.3 vs. 11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 88.9% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and in 72.7% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with advanced endometrial cancer. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme [a subsidiary of Merck]; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03517449.).

NSABP FB-10: a phase Ib/II trial evaluating ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported our phase Ib trial, testing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of T-DM1 + neratinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with ERBB2 amplification in ctDNA had deeper and more durable responses. This study extends these observations with in-depth analysis of molecular markers and mechanisms of resistance in additional patients. METHODS: Forty-nine HER2-positive patients (determined locally) who progressed on-treatment with trastuzumab + pertuzumab were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study. Mutations and HER2 amplifications were assessed in ctDNA before (C1D1) and on-treatment (C2D1) with the Guardant360 assay. Archived tissue (TP0) and study entry biopsies (TP1) were assayed for whole transcriptome, HER2 copy number, and mutations, with Ampli-Seq, and centrally for HER2 with CLIA assays. Patient responses were assessed with RECIST v1.1, and Molecular Response with the Guardant360 Response algorithm. RESULTS: The ORR in phase II was 7/22 (32%), which included all patients who had at least one dose of study therapy. In phase I, the ORR was 12/19 (63%), which included only patients who were considered evaluable, having received their first scan at 6 weeks. Central confirmation of HER2-positivity was found in 83% (30/36) of the TP0 samples. HER2-amplified ctDNA was found at C1D1 in 48% (20/42) of samples. Patients with ctHER2-amp versus non-amplified HER2 ctDNA determined in C1D1 ctDNA had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS): 480 days versus 60 days (P = 0.015). Molecular Response scores were significantly associated with both PFS (HR 0.28, 0.09-0.90, P = 0.033) and best response (P = 0.037). All five of the patients with ctHER2-amp at C1D1 who had undetectable ctDNA after study therapy had an objective response. Patients whose ctHER2-amp decreased on-treatment had better outcomes than patients whose ctHER2-amp remained unchanged. HER2 RNA levels show a correlation to HER2 CLIA IHC status and were significantly higher in patients with clinically documented responses compared to patients with progressive disease (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The following biomarkers were associated with better outcomes for patients treated with T-DM1 + neratinib: (1) ctHER2-amp (C1D1) or in TP1; (2) Molecular Response scores; (3) loss of detectable ctDNA; (4) RNA levels of HER2; and (5) on-treatment loss of detectable ctHER2-amp. HER2 transcriptional and IHC/FISH status identify HER2-low cases (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ and FISH negative) in these heavily anti-HER2 treated patients. Due to the small number of patients and samples in this study, the associations we have shown are for hypothesis generation only and remain to be validated in future studies. Clinical Trials registration NCT02236000.

Neratinib could be effective as monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab in HER2-low breast cancer cells and organoid models.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that patients with HER2-low breast cancers do not benefit from trastuzumab treatment although the reasons remain unclear. METHODS: We investigated the effect of trastuzumab monotherapy and its combination with different HER2 targeting treatments in a panel of breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) using biochemical methods and cell viability assays. RESULTS: Compared to sensitive HER2 over-expressing (IHC3 + ) breast cancer cells, increasing doses of trastuzumab could not achieve IC50 in MDA-MB-361 (IHC 2 + FISH + ) and MDA-MB-453 (IHC 2 + FISH-) cells which showed an intermediate response to trastuzumab. Trastuzumab treatment induced upregulation of HER ligand release, resulting in the activation of HER receptors in these cells, which could account for their trastuzumab insensitivity. Adding a dual ADAM10/17 inhibitor to inhibit the shedding of HER ligands in combination with trastuzumab only showed a modest decrease in the cell viability of HER2-low breast cancer cells and PDOs. However, the panHER inhibitor neratinib was an effective monotherapy in HER2-low breast cancer cells and PDOs, and showed additive effects when combined with trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that neratinib in combination with trastuzumab may be effective in a subset of HER2-low breast cancers although further validation is required in a larger panel of PDOs and in future clinical studies.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab or everolimus has activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma. The efficacy of these regimens as compared with that of sunitinib is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and no previous systemic therapy to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg orally once daily) plus everolimus (5 mg orally once daily), or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily, alternating 4 weeks receiving treatment and 2 weeks without treatment). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Overall survival and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1069 patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (355 patients), lenvatinib plus everolimus (357), or sunitinib (357). Progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 23.9 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.49; P<0.001) and was longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (median, 14.7 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.88; P = 0.005) but was not longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.50; P = 0.30). Grade 3 or higher adverse events emerged or worsened during treatment in 82.4% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, 83.1% of those who received lenvatinib plus everolimus, and 71.8% of those who received sunitinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring in at least 10% of the patients in any group included hypertension, diarrhea, and elevated lipase levels. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than sunitinib. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02811861.).

Combinational zimberelimab plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy for alpha-fetoprotein elevated, advanced gastric cancer patients (AFPGC): a phase 1 dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein elevated gastric cancer (AFPGC) got growing interests for its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. Here, a phase 1 dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of zimberelimab (GLS-010, anti-PD-1) plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy (XELOX) as the first-line treatment for AFPGC. METHODS: Histologically confirmed HER2-negative, advanced GC patients with elevated serum AFP level (≥ 20 ng/ml) were screened. Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients were administered varying doses of lenvatinib (12, 16, 20 mg) with GLS-010 and XELOX. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were fatigue (55.6%), hand-foot syndrome (55.6%) and rash (55.6%), and no grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. All patients exhibited disease control with ORR reaching 33.3%. The median PFS and OS reached 7.67 months (95% CI 4.07-11.27) and 13.17 months (95% CI 2.78-23.56), respectively. Serum AFP level was found correlated with therapeutic responses. Further 16s rRNA sequencing analysis demonstrated altered gut microbiota with elevated abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium-GAM79 and Roseburia hominis A2-183. CONCLUSIONS: GLS-010 plus lenvatinib and XELOX demonstrated a manageable safety profile with promising efficacy for AFPGC. With RP2D of lenvatinib determined as 16 mg, further expansion cohort is now ongoing. Translational investigation suggested that serum AFP can be indictive for therapeutic responses and certain microbiota species indicating favorable responses to immunotherapy was elevated after the combinational treatment.

The later-line efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment after EGFR-TKI resistance is of great clinical concern. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in later-line therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after TKI treatment failure and to explore the independent predictive factors of therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after previous standard EGFR-TKI therapy but still failed after multiline treatments were included retrospectively in this study. Most of the patients had previously received at least three lines of treatment. All were treated with anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy. The safety of this combined treatment was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated by survival analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DCR). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 28.6 months (range: 2.3-54.0 months), and the median number of treatment lines was 4. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 19.7% and 77.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2-7.4 months), and the median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI 12.0-22.3 months). Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib had an encouraging intracranial ORR of 38.5% and a DCR of 80.8%. ECOG performance status < 2 at baseline was independent protective factors of PFS. Metastatic organs and ECOG performance status were independent parameters in predicting OS. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (93.0%) patients; most of the adverse events were Grade 1-2, and no increase in adverse events was observed compared to monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based regimen exhibited promising efficacy and tolerance in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations after previous TKI failure. The efficacy of this combined regimen in patients with EGFR mutations should be further evaluated.

Efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is widely used in treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), but the benefit of its combination with immunotherapy needs to be verified. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in systemic treatment-naïve patients with uHCC. METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study, systemic treatment-naïve patients with uHCC received tislelizumab 200 mg every three weeks plus lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥ 60 kg: 12 mg; < 60 kg: 8 mg; once daily). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated in safety run-in phase to determine whether to enter the expansion phase. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Based on Simon's two-stage design, > 6 responders were needed in stage 1 (n = 30) to continue the study, and ≥ 18 responders were needed by the end of stage 2 (n = 60) to demonstrate statistical superiority to a historical control of lenvatinib monotherapy. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled. No DLTs were reported. The study achieved statistical superiority (p = 0.0003) with 23 responders assessed by IRC per RECIST v1.1 in the first 60 patients of the efficacy evaluable analysis set (n = 62). After a median follow-up of 15.7 months, confirmed ORR and disease control rate were 38.7% (24/62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.6-51.9) and 90.3% (56/62, 95% CI, 80.1-96.4), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.8-not evaluable). Overall survival rate at 12 months was 88.6% (95% CI, 77.7-94.4). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18 (28.1%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab plus lenvatinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity with favourable tolerability as first-line therapy for patients with uHCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04401800).

Lenvatinib rechallenge after failure of lenvatinib and sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer.

The oral multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and lenvatinib are currently available as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic thyroid cancer. However, treatment options for patients who are refractory to these multikinase inhibitors are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rechallenged lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in the real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive 16 patients with metastatic thyroid cancer who received lenvatinib as a rechallenge after failure of initial lenvatinib and sorafenib treatment at Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2016 and 2023. Of these, the initial lenvatinib was discontinued in 12 patients owing to progressive disease, in 3 patients owing to adverse events, and in 1 patient owing to both. The overall response rate was 6.7%, and disease control was achieved by rechallenge with lenvatinib in all patients with the target lesions. The median progression free survival after rechallenging with lenvatinib was 15.0 months. No new signs of toxicity were observed after rechallenging with lenvatinib. Our findings suggest that rechallenge with lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib showed manageable safety and modest efficacy in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in clinical practice. The strategy of lenvatinib rechallenge may provide an alternative option for patients with no targetable driver genes or when selective kinase inhibitors are not indicated.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib individually has shown favorable outcomes, but there is currently no meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment for HCC. The aim of this study was to identify the efficacy and safety of TACE plus lenvatinib for the treatment of HCC. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was conducted on July 31, 2023. RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TACE in combination with lenvatinib for the treatment of HCC were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Outcome measures such as objective response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety parameters were extracted from the included studies. Binary outcomes were analyzed using odds ratio (OR), risk ratio, or hazard ratio (HR), while continuous variables were analyzed using mean difference (MD) or standardized MD in RStudio. The quality of the evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. Heterogeneity was considered significant when the I-squared was 50% or less. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 638 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the TACE plus lenvatinib group had a significantly higher mean ORR compared to the control group (OR: 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.50-5.32, fixed-effects model; OR: 3.58, 95% CI: 2.45-5.24, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). Specifically, 40.9% of patients in the TACE plus lenvatinib group achieved a PR, which was significantly higher than the control group (OR: 3.51, 95% CI: 2.41-5.13, fixed-effects model; OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.36-5.07, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). The HR for OS was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.62, fixed-effects model and random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). The meta-analysis revealed that the TACE plus lenvatinib group had a significantly higher total adverse effects rate than the control group (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01-3.43, fixed-effects model; OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.00-3.43, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the combination of TACE and lenvatinib in the treatment of HCC has shown promising results, with extended OS and improved ORR.

The efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency ablation combined with Lenvatinib plus Sintilimab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). However, the overall prognosis remains suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable HCC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were included and divided into two cohorts: RFA combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab (R-L-S group) and lenvatinib plus sintilimab (L-S group). The primary efficacy endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Adverse events were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods for the entire cohort were 14.0 months. The R-L-S group (n = 60) had a significantly higher ORR than those with L-S alone (n = 62) (40.0% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.022). Moreover, patients in the R-L-S group had improved median PFS (12 vs. 8 months; p = 0.013) and median overall survival (24 vs. 18 months; p = 0.037), as compared with lenvatinib and sintilimab alone. No significant difference in treatment related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade between the two groups. The most common TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 were fatigue 10.0% (6/60) and hand-foot skin reaction 10.0% (6/60) in the R-L-S group and hand-foot skin reaction 11.3% (7/62) in the L-S group. CONCLUSION: In unresectable HCC patients, the incorporation of RFA to lenvatinib plus sintilimab demonstrated improved efficacy without compromising safety compared with lenvatinib plus sintilimab alone.

Safety and efficacy of multi-target TKI combined with nivolumab in check-point inhibitor-refractory patients with advanced NSCLC: a prospective, single-arm, two-stage study.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a major unmet medical need in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition may reverse a suppressive microenvironment and recover sensitivity to subsequent ICIs. METHODS: This phase Ib/IIa, single-arm study, comprised dose-finding (Part A) and expansion (Part B) cohorts. Patients with ICIs-refractory NSCLC were enrolled to receive anlotinib (a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor) orally (from days 1 to 14 in a 21-day cycle) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously) on a 21-day treatment cycle. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a safety observation period (phase Ib) followed by a phase II expansion cohort. The primary objectives were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D, part A), safety (part B), and objective response rate (ORR, part B), respectively. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and March 2022, 34 patients were screened, and 21 eligible patients were enrolled (6 patients in Part A). The RP2D of anlotinib is 12 mg/day orally (14 days on and 7 days off) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) of any cause and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in all treated patients. Two patients (9.5%) experienced grade 3 TRAE. No grade 4 or higher AEs were observed. Serious AEs were reported in 4 patients. Six patients experienced anlotinib interruption and 4 patients experienced nivolumab interruption due to TRAEs. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) was 19.0% and 76.2%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-NE) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 12.1-NE), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with nivolumab shows manageable safety and promising efficacy signals. Further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04507906 August 11, 2020.

TACE combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab versus TACE alone in efficacy and safety for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.

BACKGROUNDS: To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab (TLC) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with those of TACE alone . METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 222 patients with uHCC who were treated between September 2013 and Jun 2023. One group received TACE + lenvatinib + camrelizumab (TLC) (n = 97) and another group received TACE alone (n = 151). Efficacy and safety were compared after propensity score matching between the TLC and TACE groups. RESULTS: After propensity matching, the TLC group had higher objective response rate (ORR) (88.6% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001), disease control rate (DCR) (94.3%% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.001), and conversion rates before and after propensity matching were 44.1% and 41.4%, respectively, compared with the TACE group. The median progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (12.7 vs. 6.1 months, P = 0.005). The median overall survival (OS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (19.4 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.023). Cox multivariate analysis with different modes of adjustment showed that treatment was an independent influencing factor of PFS and OS. The interaction analysis showed that cirrhosis and Child-Pugh stage an interactive role in the PFS of different treatment. Decreased AFP after treatment portends higher ORR and DCR. CONCLUSION: TACE combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab regimen was safe and superior to TACE alone in improving PFS, OS, and tumor response rates for unresectable recurrent HCC patients.

Montelukast as a repurposable additive drug for standard-efficacy multiple sclerosis treatment: Emulating clinical trials with retrospective administrative health claims data.

BACKGROUND: Effective and safe treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) are still needed. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) currently indicated for asthma or allergic rhinitis, may provide an additional therapeutic approach. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of montelukast on the relapses of people with MS (pwMS). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, two independent longitudinal claims datasets were used to emulate randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We identified pwMS aged 18-65 years, on MS disease-modifying therapies concomitantly, in de-identified claims from Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart (CDM) and IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics. Cases included 483 pwMS on montelukast and with medication adherence in CDM and 208 in PharMetrics Plus for Academics. We randomly sampled controls from 35,330 pwMS without montelukast prescriptions in CDM and 10,128 in PharMetrics Plus for Academics. Relapses were measured over a 2-year period through inpatient hospitalization and corticosteroid claims. A doubly robust causal inference model estimated the effects of montelukast, adjusting for confounders and censored patients. RESULTS: pwMS treated with montelukast demonstrated a statistically significant 23.6% reduction in relapses compared to non-users in 67.3% of emulated RCTs. CONCLUSION: Real-world evidence suggested that montelukast reduces MS relapses, warranting future clinical trials and further research on LTRAs' potential mechanism in MS.

A real-world analysis of second-line treatment option, gemcitabine plus anlotinib and anti-PD1, in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), there is only one approved regimen based on the phase III NAPOLI-1 trial. However, for patients progressing after Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine (Nab-P/Gem) or Nab-P combinations, second-line treatment were very limited. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of patients. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of a novel regimen, gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1, in APC patients and to compare it with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) in the second-line setting who have failed on the first-line Nab-P combinations. RESULTS: In total, twenty-three patients received Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 in the second-line, 28 patients were treated with FOLFORINOX. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or progression free survival (PFS) for either of the two sequences (p > 0.05). Patients who received Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 had a median PFS of 4.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-6.9) versus 3.5 months (95% CI 1.8-5.2) in FOLFORINOX group (p = 0.953). The median OS of Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 was 9.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-13.7) and 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.5-10.5) in FOLFORINOX group (p = 0.373). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred for 13% of patients with Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 and 40% for FOLFORINOX. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms the effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 as a well-tolerated regimen in the second-line treatment of APC and extends available data on its use as a second-line treatment option when compared with FOLFIRINOX.

Practical considerations in the management of patients treated with bosutinib for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and for patients with Ph + chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. As is the case for all TKIs approved for treatment of CML, bosutinib is associated with adverse events (AEs) that require appropriate management to ensure adherence to treatment and optimized outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide physicians with updated practical information for the prevention and management of AEs occurring during treatment with bosutinib, including dosing strategies, based on the latest published evidence and clinical experience. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have shown bosutinib has a generally favorable safety profile, which has remained consistent across lines of therapy and in long-term reports. Adjusting the starting dose and/or modifying the dose during treatment with bosutinib are important strategies to manage AEs and improve tolerability, which are recognized within the label and in treatment guidelines. Dosing adjustment strategies to manage AEs are a recognized management approach for other TKIs in the treatment of CML and are not exclusive to bosutinib. In summary, long-term results from clinical trials and emerging real-world evidence demonstrate bosutinib has a safety profile that can largely be managed with treatment modifications and/or supportive care. Increased experience in managing toxicities and by using a personalized dosing approach may further improve adherence and outcomes with bosutinib.

Incidence of pleural effusion with dasatinib and the effect of switching therapy to a different TKI in patients with chronic phase CML.

Dasatinib is one of the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) both in the front line and in the second line setting. Pleural effusion (PE) is a unique toxicity associated with dasatinib use. Our aim was to study the incidence of pleural effusion in our cohort of patients who were treated with dasatinib for CP-CML and the safety upon TKI switch. A total of 390 patients were treated with dasatinib during their course of treatment for CP-CML. A total of 69 patients (17.6%) developed any grade of PE. About 33 (48%) patients developed CTCAE grade 2 PE, 34 (49%) grade 3 and only 1 patient developed grade 4 PE. Recurrence of PE was observed in 34 (49%) patients. While only 12 patients (17.3%) continued using dasatinib after development of PE, dasatinib was discontinued in the other 57 patients. Therapy was switched to bosutinib in 13 patients out of which 6 (46%) patients re-developed PE. While only 12.5% patients developed re-accumulation of pleural fluid in patients switched to imatinib, none of the patients switched to nilotinib re-developed PE. A change in TKI to bosutinib was associated with a 46% risk of recurrence of PE in patients who develop PE on dasatinib for the treatment of CP-CML. The incidence of recurrent PE was markedly lower in patient switched to imatinib or nilotinib.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated advanced ovarian cancer: Results from the phase 2 multicohort LEAP-005 study.

OBJECTIVES: The phase 2, multicohort, open-label LEAP-005 study evaluated lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. We report outcomes from the ovarian cancer cohort. METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic/unresectable ovarian cancer and had received 3 previous lines of therapy. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg/day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Treatment continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or (for pembrolizumab) completion of 35 cycles. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1 and safety. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. 39% had high grade serous ovarian cancer, 23% were platinum-sensitive, 55% were platinum-resistant, 23% were platinum-refractory, and 84% had tumors that had a PD-L1 combined positive (CPS) score ≥1. ORR (95% CI) was 26% (12%-45%) by investigator assessment and 35% (19%-55%) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Per BICR, median DOR was 9.2 (1.5+ to 37.8+) months. ORRs (95% CI) by BICR were 35% (9/26 patients; 17%-56%) for PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 disease and 50% (2/4 patients; 7%-93%) for PD-L1 CPS < 1 disease. Median (95% CI) PFS by BICR and OS were 6.2 (4.0-8.5) months and 21.3 (11.7-32.3) months, respectively. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 94% of patients (grade 3-4, 77%). One patient died from treatment-related hypovolemic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity as fourth line therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, and no unanticipated safety signals were identified. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 status.

Combination of anlotinib and toripalimab for an advanced biliary tract cancer patient with high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status: a case report.

Up to 80% of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients relapse within 3 years after surgery and the efficacy of second-line treatment remains dismal for patients who progressed on gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy. Median overall survival of patients with palliative chemotherapy is less than 1 year. The feasibility and safety of targeted therapies plus immunotherapies remain scanty currently, and patients with recurrent or advanced BTCs often experience a rapid decline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. This case report is the first report suggesting a 17-month progression-free survival (PFS), partial response, and another 11-month PFS after progressive disease of anlotinib plus toripalimab in advanced BTC with high ECOG performance status. We report a 67-year-old Chinese male with BTC. He was observed with progressive disease after surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, and diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage IV (cT3N0M1) extrahepatic BTC. The patient experienced a rapid decline in performance status, and he received oral anlotinib and toripalimab with informed consent. MRI scans showed partial response on 22 June 2022. PET-CT showed that tumor activity has been inhibited on 8 March 2023. He achieved 17 months of PFS. Although the patient developed solitary lung metastasis, he had a continuous survival benefit from treatment of anlotinib plus toripalimab after lung radiotherapy. Until the writing of the case draft, he had achieved another 11 months of PFS. The present case suggests that anlotinib plus toripalimab might be a potential effective treatment for advanced BTCs patients with high ECOG performance status.

Enhancing the management of locally advanced head and neck malignancies and cases with local/neck recurrence and metastasis through the integration of anlotinib with concurrent radiochemotherapy.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib in conjunction with concurrent radiochemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck malignant tumors, including cases exhibiting local or neck recurrence and metastasis. Between June 2020 and June 2023, 42 patients diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck malignant tumors or presenting with local or neck recurrence and metastasis were recruited. These individuals received treatment that combined anlotinib with concurrent radiochemotherapy, followed by a minimum of two cycles of oral anlotinib upon completion of the initial treatment regimen. Among the 19 patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 14 patients attained a complete response, while four patients achieved partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 94.74% (18/19). Conversely, among the 23 patients with non-nasopharyngeal carcinoma, two patients achieved complete response and 16 attained partial response, yielding a response rate of 78.26% (18/23). The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 95.24%. After treatment, serum vascular endothelial growth factor receptor levels exhibited a significant decrease compared with pretreatment levels. Notably, no instances of treatment-related serious adverse reactions were recorded. The combination of anlotinib with concurrent radiochemotherapy demonstrates favorable efficacy in managing locally advanced head and neck malignant tumors, including instances of local or neck recurrence and metastasis. Furthermore, the treatment regimen is characterized by an acceptable safety profile and tolerability.