Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(4): 696-703, 2020 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31132217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few data are available for current usage patterns of intravascular modalities such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Moreover, patient and procedural-based outcomes related to intravascular modality guidance compared to angiography guidance have not been fully investigated yet. METHODS: We examined 11,731 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the Korea AMI Registry-National Institute of Health database. Patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) was defined as all-cause death, any infarction, and any revascularization. Device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) was defined as cardiac death, target-vessel reinfarction, and target-lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Overall, intravascular modalities were utilized in 2,659 (22.7%) patients including 2,333 (19.9%) IVUS, 277 (2.4%) OCT, and 157 (1.3%) FFR. In the unmatched cohort, POCE (5.4 vs. 8.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.93; p = .008) and DOCE (4.6 vs. 7.4%; adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.97; p = .028) were significantly lower in intravascular modality-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. In the propensity-score-matched cohorts, POCE (5.9 vs. 7.7%; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.92; p = .006) and DOCE (5.0 vs. 6.8%; HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.90; p = .004) were significantly lower in intravascular modality guidance compared with angiography guidance. The difference was mainly driven by reduced all-cause mortality (4.4 vs. 7.0%; p < .001) and cardiac mortality (3.3 vs. 5.2%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: In this large-scale AMI registry, intravascular modality guidance was associated with an improving clinical outcome in selected high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Radiografía Intervencional , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , República de Corea , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/mortalidad
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(6): 1018-1024.e4, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376173

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that random forest models trained on a large national sample can accurately predict relevant outcomes and may ultimately contribute to future clinical decision support tools in IR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data from years 2012-2014 of the National Inpatient Sample were used to develop random forest machine learning models to predict iatrogenic pneumothorax after computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy (TTB), in-hospital mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and length of stay > 3 days after uterine artery embolization (UAE). Model performance was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and maximum F1 score. The threshold for AUROC significance was set at 0.75. RESULTS: AUROC was 0.913 for the TTB model, 0.788 for the TIPS model, and 0.879 for the UAE model. Maximum F1 score was 0.532 for the TTB model, 0.357 for the TIPS model, and 0.700 for the UAE model. The TTB model had the highest AUROC, while the UAE model had the highest F1 score. All models met the criteria for AUROC significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that machine learning models may suitably predict a variety of different clinically relevant outcomes, including procedure-specific complications, mortality, and length of stay. Performance of these models will improve as more high-quality IR data become available.


Asunto(s)
Minería de Datos/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumotórax/etiología , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(1): 93-98, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767410

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield and safety of image-guided lung biopsies in immunocompromised pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective pediatric cohort study conducted from June 2000 to April 2017. Subjects were 0-17 years of age (median, 10 years of age). There were 46 males (48%). A total of 73 consecutive image-guided lung biopsies were performed in 68 patients (weight range, 4.9-97.3 kg [median, 25.3 kg]). The indication for biopsy was to isolate an organism to tailor medical therapy. All patients were immunocompromised with an underlying history of bone marrow transplantation (n = 50), primary immunodeficiency (n = 14), and solid organ transplantation (n = 4). Patient and technical factors were analyzed for rates of complication. RESULTS: Overall diagnostic yield was 43 of 73 patients (60%). There were 14 minor (19%) and 8 major (11%) complications. Major complications included pneumothorax or hemoptysis requiring intervention (n = 6), and death (n = 2). The histological diagnosis was an infectious cause in 5 of 8 major complications (63%). There were statistically significant differences between the rates of complications with the imaging modality used (P = .02) and the use of fine needle aspiration (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided percutaneous lung biopsy can be helpful in isolating an organism to tailor therapy. Biopsies performed in immunosuppressed patients result in an elevated complication risk of up to 30% and demonstrate lower diagnostic yield and increased mortality, which should warrant detailed discussion with the primary team and family.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Enfermedades Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/patología , Radiografía Intervencional , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/mortalidad , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pulmón/inmunología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inmunología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/mortalidad
4.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(11): 1772-1783, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981819

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of CT hepatic arteriography compared with conventional CT fluoroscopy guidance in percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) ablation to treat colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center comparative, retrospective study analyzed data of 108 patients treated with 156 percutaneous ablation procedures (42 CT fluoroscopy guidance [25 RF ablation, 17 MW ablation]; 114 CT hepatic arteriography guidance [18 RF ablation, 96 MW ablation]) for 260 CRLM between January 2009 and May 2019. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. LTPFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were no complications related to the transarterial catheter procedure. CT hepatic arteriography proved superior to CT fluoroscopy regarding 2-year LTPFS (18/202 [8.9%] vs 19/58 [32.8%]; P < .001, respectively). CT hepatic arteriography versus CT fluoroscopy (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.54; P < .001) and MW ablation versus RF ablation (hazard ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-1.12; P = .094) were positive predictors for longer LTPFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that CT hepatic arteriography versus CT fluoroscopy (hazard ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.90; P = .025) was associated with a significantly superior LTPFS. OS was similar between the 2 cohorts (P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: While adding procedure time and marginal patient burden, transcatheter CT hepatic arteriography-guided ablation was associated with increased local disease control and superior LTPFS compared with conventional CT fluoroscopy. CT hepatic arteriography represents a safe and valid alternative to CT fluoroscopy, as it reduces the number of repeat ablations required without adding risk or detrimental effect on survival.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional , Técnicas de Ablación/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Ablación/mortalidad , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/efectos adversos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/mortalidad , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Tempo Operativo , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
5.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(10): 1600-1608, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861569

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare survival after CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) and folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) chemotherapy versus FOLFIRINOX only in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post hoc comparison was performed of data derived from a prospective IRE-FOLFIRINOX cohort and a retrospective FOLFIRINOX-only cohort. All patients received a minimum of 3 cycles of FOLFIRINOX for LAPC and were considered eligible for CT-guided percutaneous IRE. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local and distant progression-free survival, and time to progression (TTP) and were compared using stratified Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients who received > 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX before IRE and who had tumors > 6 cm in the FOLFIRINOX-only group were excluded. RESULTS: Of 103 patients with a diagnosis of LAPC, 52 were deemed eligible (n = 30 IRE-FOLFIRINOX and n = 22 FOLFIRINOX-only). Patients in the FOLFIRINOX-only arm had larger tumors (53 mm ± 19 vs 38 mm ± 7, P = .340), had more locoregional lymph node metastases (23% vs 7%, P = .622), and more often received radiotherapy (7 patients vs 2 patients, P = .027); all other baseline characteristics were comparable. Median OS was 17.0 months (range, 5-35 mo; SD = 6) for IRE-FOLFIRINOX versus 12.4 months (range, 3-22 mo; SD = 6) for FOLFIRINOX-only (P = .038). After sensitivity analyses, median OS was 17.2 months (range, 6-27 mo; SD = 6) versus 12.4 months (range, 7-32 mo; SD = 10) (P = .05). Median TTP was longer in the IRE-FOLFIRINOX group: 14.2 months (range, 5-25 mo; SD = 4) versus 5.2 months (range, 2-22; SD = 6) (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAPC after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, CT-guided percutaneous IRE may improve OS and TTP. This study may facilitate the design of randomized controlled trials to compare survival after IRE-FOLRINOX versus FOLFIRINOX-only.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Electroporación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Técnicas de Ablación/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Ablación/mortalidad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 64: 54-61, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31726201

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assistance for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) to standard assistance by angiography. METHODS: From June 2015 to June 2017, 173 consecutive patients underwent EVAR. In this group, 69 procedures were IVUS-assisted with X-ray exposure limited to completion angiography for safety purposes because an IVUS probe does not yet incorporate a duplex probe (group A), and 104 were angiography-assisted procedures (group B). All IVUS-assisted procedures were performed by vascular surgeons with basic duplex ultrasound (DUS) training. The primary study endpoints were mean radiation dose, duration of fluoroscopy, amount of contrast media administered, procedure-related outcomes, and renal clearance expressed as the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before and after the procedure. Secondary endpoints were operative mortality, morbidity, and arterial access complications. RESULTS: Mean duration of fluoroscopy time was significantly lower for IVUS-assisted procedures (24 ± 15 min vs. 40 ± 30 min for angiography-assisted procedures, P < 0.01). Moreover, mean radiation dose (Air KERMA) was significantly lower in IVUS-assisted procedures (76m Gy [44-102] vs. 131 mGy [58-494]), P < 0.01. IVUS-assisted procedures required fewer contrast media than standard angiography-assisted procedures (60 ± 20 mL vs. 120 ± 40 mL, P < 0.01). The mean duration of the procedure was comparable in the two groups (120 ± 30 min vs. 140 ± 30 min, P = 0.07). No difference in renal clearance before and after the procedure was observed in either of the two groups (99.0 ± 4/97.8 ± 2 mL/min in group A and 98.0 ± 3/97.6 ± 5 mL/min in group B) (P = 0.28). The mean length of follow-up was nine months (6-30 months). No postoperative mortality, morbidity, or arterial access complications occurred. No type 1 endoleak was observed. Early type II endoleaks were observed in 21 patients (11%), 12 in the angiography-assisted group (11%) and nine in the IVUS-assisted group (12%). They were not associated with sac enlargement ≥5 mm diameter and therefore did not require any additional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard angiography-assisted EVAR, IVUS significantly reduces renal load with contrast media, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose while preserving endograft deployment efficiency. Confirmation from a large prospective study with improved IVUS probes will be required before IVUS-assisted EVAR alone can become standard practice.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Radiografía Intervencional , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 68: 8-14, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428641

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) is a feared complication of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs), associated with increased mortality. Whether kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of PC-AKI after PVI is unknown. This study analyzes the perioperative outcomes of KTR following PVI, with emphasis on the incidence and risk factors for PC-AKI. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative files for PVI (2010-2018) were reviewed. Patients on dialysis were excluded. PC-AKI was defined by Vascular Quality Initiative as creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL or new dialysis requirement. Characteristics of KTR and patients without kidney transplant were compared, and propensity score matching used to control for differences in baseline features. Multivariable logistic regression was used to define risk factors for PC-AKI, and survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58,014 procedures were analyzed, including 641 (1%) procedures for KTR. The incidence of PC-AKI in KTR was 2.8% compared with 0.9% in patients without kidney transplants. Baseline warfarin use (odds ratio [OR] = 4.7) and poor allograft function (OR = 4.0) were significantly associated with increased risk for PC-AKI in KTR. Compared with a matched group of patients without kidney transplant, KTR had similar risk of PC-AKI and were more likely to develop postop myocardial infarction (OR = 4.3) but had lower in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PC-AKI in KTR is higher than the overall population undergoing PVI but is not elevated compared with propensity-matched patients without kidney transplant. PVI for peripheral artery disease in KTR is safe and associated with acceptable perioperative and long-term survival.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/patología , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 94(4): 636-641, 2019 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31419029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Similar to coronary angiography and interventions, patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease are also at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). The incidence, risk factors associations, need for dialysis and inhospital mortality related to AKI in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following endovascular therapy is poorly defined. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to determine the aforementioned outcomes in patients with CLI. METHODS: Using the full NIS admission dataset from 2003 through 2012, ICD-9 codes relevant to comorbid conditions, procedure codes, composite codes for AKI, and inhospital mortality were analyzed using multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 273,624 patients were included with a mean age of 70.0 ± 27.4 years, 46.0% were female, 57.2% had diabetes, 43.4% had coronary artery disease (CAD), and 29.2% had chronic kidney disease (CKD). The overall rate of AKI was 10.4%, and there was a temporal rise over the analysis period in AKI incidence (p < .001). Age, diabetes, CKD, and heart failure were all associated with AKI (p < .0001). The inhospital mortality rate in the patients with AKI declined over time but was higher than in patients without AKI (6.0% vs. 1.4%), p < .0001. The mortality rate was substantially higher in patients with AKI requiring dialysis as compared to AKI not requiring dialysis (13.4% vs. 5.6%), p < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is associated with age, CKD, and heart failure. The incidence of AKI following endovascular therapy for CLI is rising and independently associated with inhospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crítica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(2): E90-E97, 2019 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30280476

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the rate of major adverse renal or cardiac events (MARCE) when iohexol is used during interventional cardiovascular procedures compared to other low osmolar contrast media (LOCMs). BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiovascular procedures are often essential for diagnosis and treatment, the risk of MARCE should be considered. METHODS: Data were derived from the Premier Hospital Database January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2015. Patient encounters with an inpatient primary interventional cardiovascular procedure with a single LOCM (iohexol, ioversol, ioxilan, ioxaglate, or iopamidol) were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of MARCE, which included: renal failure with dialysis, acute kidney injury (AKI) with or without dialysis, contrast induced AKI, acute myocardial infarction, angina, stent occlusion/thrombosis, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or death. Multivariable regression analysis was performed using the hospital fixed-effects specification to assess the relationship between MARCE and iohexol compared to other LOCMs, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbid conditions and reason for hospitalization. As a sensitivity analysis, direct comparisons of iohexol were made to other LOCMs. RESULTS: A total of 458,091 inpatient encounters met inclusion criteria of which 26% used iohexol and 74% used other LOCMs. Results of multivariable modeling revealed no differences in MARCE rates between iohexol and other LOCMs. When direct comparisons of iohexol vs. ioversol and iopamidol were modeled, no differences in MARCE nor the renal component of MARCE were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective multicenter study, there were no differences in MARCE events with iohexol compared to other LOCMs during inpatient interventional cardiovascular procedures.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Cardiopatías/inducido químicamente , Yohexol/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/terapia , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiopatías/terapia , Humanos , Yohexol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(1): 10-18, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30580809

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization using guidance software for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients with treatment-naïve HCC with ≤ 7-cm and ≤ 5 lesions treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization using guidance software were selected. Technical success was classified into 3 grades by computed tomography performed 1 week after transarterial chemoembolization: (i) A, complete embolization with a safety margin; (ii) B, entire tumor embolization without a safety margin; and (iii) C, incomplete embolization. Intrahepatic tumor recurrence was classified into 2 categories: local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR). Overall survival (OS) and tumor recurrence rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, the incidences of LTP between grade A and B tumors, IDR with/without LTP, and OS with/without LTP were compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six (82.1%) tumors were determined to be grade A, 26 (13.7%) were determined to be grade B, and 8 (4.2%) were determined to be grade C. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year LTP and IDR rates were 31.7%, 49.4%, and 59.4% and 33.9%, 58.2%, and 73.3%, respectively. LTP developed more frequently in grade B tumors than grade A tumors (P = .0016). IDR developed more frequently in patients with LTP than without LTP (P = .0004). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 96.1%, 71.1%, and 60%, respectively; the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in patients with/without LTP were 95.7%, 69.8%, and 59.3% and 96.2%, 71.6%, and 59.4%, respectively (P = .9984). CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial chemoembolization guidance software promotes the technical success of transarterial chemoembolization and excellent OS in HCC patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 18(1): 115, 2018 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29898668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although several meta-analyses have demonstrated the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in guiding drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to angiography-guidance, there has been a dearth of evidence in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesion subset. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of IVUS versus conventional angiography guidance during implantation of DES for patients with LMCA disease. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched. RESULTS: A total of 1002 publications were reviewed; and finally, seven clinical studies - one prospective randomized controlled trial and six observational studies with 4592 patients (1907 IVUS-guided and 2685 angiography-guided) - were included in the meta-analysis. IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (relative ratio [RR] 95% CI 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.70; P < 0.001), all-cause death (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; P < 0.001), cardiac death (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62; P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80; P < 0.001), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.84; P = 0.01) compared with angiographic guidance. However, there was no significant difference regarding target lesion revascularization (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18; P = 0.099) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.56; P = 0. 322). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to angiographic guidance, IVUS-guided DES implantation was associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with LMCA lesions, especially hard endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/mortalidad
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 90(2): 205-212, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28112470

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Ascertaining risk of contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI). BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease. However, a practice of MV-PCI may be associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI. We aimed to evaluate the risk of CI-AKI in patients with STEMI and MV-PCI and examine the accuracy of a validated risk score. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception through August 31, 2016 for randomized studies comparing CI-AKI rates with MV-PCI and infarct-related artery (IRA) only PCI during index hospitalization. A random effects model was used to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to assess the ability of the Mehran risk score to accurately predict the incidence of CI-AKI in patients undergoing MV-PCI. RESULTS: Four randomized studies (N = 1,602) were included in the final analysis. The risk of CI-AKI was low and no difference was observed with MV-PCI (1.45%) compared with IRA-only (1.94%) (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.34-1.57; P = 0.57). From 2009 to 2012, excluding shock, there were 11,454 MV-PCI for STEMI patients in the NIS. The Mehran risk score accurately discriminated 78% of the patients who developed CI-AKI in this cohort (c-statistic of 0.78, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: MV-PCI in STEMI is not associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI and the Mehran risk score can identify patients at higher risk for this complication. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 27(12): 1798-1805, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27617909

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pain-alleviating effect of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous cryoablation for recurrent retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (RPSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 19 men and 20 women (median age, 50.3 y) with recurrent malignant RPS who underwent percutaneous cryoablation were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 50 tumors were treated by cryoablation, including a single tumor in 29 patients, 2 tumors in 9, and 3 tumors in 1. Adverse events and analgesic outcomes were compared as a function of tumor size (< 10 cm and ≥ 10 cm). Efficacy was assessed based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Grade 1/2 adverse events included fever (n = 17), emesis (n = 7), frostbite (n = 5), and local pain (n = 4). The median follow-up period and PFS were 18.5 months (range, 12-42 mo) and 13.4 months ± 6.2, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 13 patients had died and 26 were living. The mean severe local pain scores on pretreatment day 1 and posttreatment days 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 were 7.49, 7.40, 6.51, 5.81, 5.35, 5.04, and 5.44, respectively, and significant differences versus pretreatment (P < .001) were reported for posttreatment days 5-25. Immediate relief occurred more frequently in the small-tumor group (4 of 7; 57.1%; P = .018), whereas delayed relief occurred more frequently in the large-tumor group (17 of 22; 77.3%; P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive percutaneous cryoablation improves local pain and is a feasible treatment for recurrent RPSs.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/prevención & control , Criocirugía/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , China , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/complicaciones , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral
15.
Acta Radiol ; 56(7): 867-72, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25024440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children undergoing interventional cardiology procedures deserve special concern due to the greater radiation sensitivity of their tissues and more remaining years of life during which a radiation-induced cancer may develop. PURPOSE: To determine the patient radiation dose for pediatric therapeutic interventional cardiology and to estimate the patient effective dose and lifetime mortality risk to children associated with five common procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety children with congenital heart defects undergoing interventional therapy were enrolled in this study. Data regarding fluoroscopy and radiography time, dose-area product (DAP) and peak skin dose (PSD) for each case were measured. Patients were divided into five groups. The patient effective dose (E) was calculated using a multiplicative model of ICRP 60. The overall lifetime mortality risk was evaluated using appropriate risk coefficients. RESULTS: The mean, median, standard deviation, and range of time, PSD, DAP, and E were presented for the five study groups. When these metrics were considered, there were wide variations for different cases within the same group and statistically significant differences between the five groups. The PSD correlated significantly with DAP (Pearson r = 0.70; P < 0.01), but the correlation in individual cases was poor. For all cases, the range of E was found to be between 0.44 and 66.7 mSv. The corresponding risk of lifetime mortality was 1.16 per thousand. CONCLUSION: The current study provides overall data on the time, PSD, E, and lifetime mortality risk for pediatric therapeutic interventional cardiology. Radio frequency ablation showed the highest radiation risk.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
16.
JAMA ; 314(20): 2155-63, 2015 Nov 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26556051

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) promotes better clinical outcomes for coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions. However, randomized data demonstrating the clinical usefulness of IVUS are limited for lesions treated with drug-eluting stents. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the long-term clinical outcomes with IVUS-guided drug-eluting stent implantation are superior to those with angiography-guided implantation in patients with long coronary lesions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions (IVUS-XPL) randomized, multicenter trial was conducted in 1400 patients with long coronary lesions (implanted stent ≥28 mm in length) between October 2010 and July 2014 at 20 centers in Korea. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive IVUS-guided (n = 700) or angiography-guided (n = 700) everolimus-eluting stent implantation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the composite of major adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 1 year, analyzed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: One-year follow-up was complete in 1323 patients (94.5%). Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year occurred in 19 patients (2.9%) undergoing IVUS-guided and in 39 patients (5.8%) undergoing angiography-guided stent implantation (absolute difference, -2.97% [95% CI, -5.14% to -0.79%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.83], P = .007). The difference was driven by a lower risk of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing IVUS-guided (17 [2.5%]) compared with angiography-guided (33 [5.0%]) stent implantation (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.91], P = .02). Cardiac death and target lesion-related myocardial infarction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. For cardiac death, there were 3 patients (0.4%) in the IVUS-guided group and 5 patients (0.7%) in the angiography-guided group (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.14 to 2.52], P = .48). Target lesion-related myocardial infarction occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) in the angiography-guided stent implantation group (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients requiring long coronary stent implantation, the use of IVUS-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation, compared with angiography-guided stent implantation, resulted in a significantly lower rate of the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. These differences were primarily due to lower risk of target lesion revascularization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01308281.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/mortalidad , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/mortalidad
18.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 25(6): 895-903, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630750

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A previous clinical trial showed that radiologic insertion of first peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters by modified Seldinger technique is noninferior to laparoscopic surgery in patients at low risk in a clinical trial setting. The present cohort study was performed to confirm clinical effectiveness of radiologic insertion in everyday practice, including insertion in patients with expanded eligibility criteria and by fellows in training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2009, 286 PD catheters were inserted in 249 patients, 133 with fluoroscopic guidance in the radiology department and 153 by laparoscopic surgery. Survival analyses were performed with the primary outcome of complication-free catheter survival and secondary outcomes of overall catheter survival and patient survival. Outcomes were assessed at last follow-up, as long as 365 days after PD catheter insertion. RESULTS: In the radiologic group, unadjusted 365-day complication-free catheter, overall catheter, and patient survival rates were 22.6%, 81.2%, and 82.7%, respectively, compared with 22.9% (P = .52), 76.5% (P = .4), and 92.8% (P = .01), respectively, in the laparoscopic group. Frequencies of individual complications were similar between groups. Adjusting for patient age, comorbidity, and previous PD catheter, the hazard ratio (HR) for catheter complications by radiologic versus laparoscopic insertion is 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.31); the HR for overall catheter survival is 1.25 (95% CI, 0.59-2.65); and that for death is 2.47 (95% CI, 0.84-7.3). CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic PD catheter insertion is a clinically effective alternative to laparoscopic surgery, although there was poorer long-term survival with radiologic catheter placement, possibly because of preferential selection of radiologic insertion for more frail patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Laparoscopía/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Anciano , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Cateterismo/mortalidad , Catéteres de Permanencia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Diálisis Peritoneal/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Eur Heart J ; 34(18): 1375-83, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23344979

RESUMEN

AIMS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the reference standard for the assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses, but is underutilized in daily clinical practice. We aimed to study long-term outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the general clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients (n = 7358), referred for PCI at the Mayo Clinic between October 2002 and December 2009, were divided in two groups: those undergoing PCI without (PCI-only, n = 6268) or with FFR measurements (FFR-guided, n = 1090). The latter group was further classified as the FFR-Perform group (n = 369) if followed by PCI, and the FFR-Defer group (n = 721) if PCI was deferred. Clinical events were compared during a median follow-up of 50.9 months. The Kaplan-Meier fraction of major adverse cardiac events at 7 years was 57.0% in the PCI-only vs. 50.0% in the FFR-guided group (P = 0.016). Patients with FFR-guided interventions had a non-significantly lower rate of death or myocardial infarction compared with those with angiography-guided interventions [hazard ratio (HR): 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.01, P = 0.06]; the FFR-guided deferred-PCI strategy was independently associated with reduced rate of myocardial infarction (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.82, P = 0.008). After excluding patients with FFR of 0.75-0.80 and deferring PCI, the use of FFR was significantly associated with reduced rate of death or myocardial infarction (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In the contemporary practice, an FFR-guided treatment strategy is associated with a favourable long-term outcome. The current study supports the use of the FFR for decision-making in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/mortalidad , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 24(12): 1779-85, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24094517

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the circumstances and determine the outcomes of medical emergencies (MEs) and cardiopulmonary arrests (CPAs) in patients undergoing interventional radiology (IR) procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all MEs and CPAs that occurred between July 2006 and December 2011 was performed. Procedure type, technical outcome, complications, etiology and location of ME/CPA, event outcome, and postevent mortality were collected. RESULTS: A total of 58 events occurred during 38,927 procedures (0.15%). Complete records were available for 55 events (43 MEs, 12 CPAs) in 53 patients (mean age, 63 y; 58.5% male) during 37 inpatient (27 MEs, 10 CPAs) and 18 outpatient (16 MEs, two CPAs) encounters. Seven events (13%; six MEs, one CPA) occurred before the start of the procedure, and 18 (33%; 16 MEs, two CPAs) occurred in the periprocedural holding area. Thirty-five procedures (64%) were completed successfully. Forty-two patients (76%) were alive at discharge, 37 (67%) at 1 month, 26 (47%) at 3 months, and 23 (42%) at 1 year. Procedural complications were attributed as the main cause of 22 MEs (51%) and one CPA (8%; P = .018). The relative risk (RR) of an ME or CPA occurring during a hemodialysis access case versus all other cases was 5.2 (95% confidence interval = 3.02-8.95; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of MEs/CPAs in patients undergoing IR procedures is low, the 1-year mortality rate following these events is high. MEs are significantly more likely than CPAs to be directly attributed to a procedural complication. The RR of MEs/CPAs is significantly higher in hemodialysis access interventions.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Urgencias Médicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA