Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The OSMO study assessed the efficacy of switching to mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma that was uncontrolled whilst receiving omalizumab. The objective of this analysis was to assess the proportion of patients achieving pre-defined improvements in up to four efficacy outcomes and the relationship between patient baseline characteristics and treatment response. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of OSMO study data (GSK ID:204471; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02654145). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, other controller(s) and omalizumab subcutaneously (≥ 4 months) were switched to mepolizumab 100 mg administered subcutaneously. Endpoints included the proportion of responders-i.e. patients achieving a pre-defined clinical improvement in ≥ 1 of the following outcomes: (1) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score (≥ 0.5-points), (2) St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (≥ 4-points), (3) pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1; ≥ 100 mL), all at Week 32, and (4) annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (≥ 50% reduction). RESULTS: Of the 145 patients included, 94%, 83%, 63% and 31% were responders for ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3 and 4 outcomes, respectively; 75% and 78% were ACQ-5 and SGRQ score responders, and 50% and 69% were FEV1 and exacerbation responders. Subgroup analyses demonstrated improvements irrespective of baseline blood eosinophil count, prior omalizumab treatment regimen/duration, comorbidities, prior exacerbation history, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores, and body weight/body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: After switching to mepolizumab, almost all patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma on omalizumab achieved a beneficial response in ≥ 1 clinical outcome. Improvements were observed regardless of baseline characteristics. Trial registration This manuscript is a post hoc analysis of data from the OSMO study. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654145. Registered January 13, 2016.

Increased multiple sclerosis disease activity in patients transitioned from fingolimod to dimethyl fumarate: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is a S1P1 receptor modulator that prevents activated lymphocyte egress from lymphoid tissues causing lymphopenia, mainly affecting CD4+ T lymphocytes. Withdrawal from fingolimod can be followed by severe disease reactivation, and this coincides with return of autoreactive lymphocytes into circulation. The CD8+ T cytotoxic population returns prior to the regulatory CD4+ T lymphocytes leading to a state of dysregulation, which may contribute to the rebound and severity of clinical relapses. On the other hand, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) preferentially reduces CD8+ T lymphocytes, has the same efficacy as fingolimod, and therefore, was expected to be a suitable oral alternative to reduce the rebound associated with fingolimod withdrawal. CASE PRESENTATION: We present six patients with relapsing-remitting MS who developed an unexpected increase in disease activity after transitioning from fingolimod to DMF. All patients were clinically and radiologically stable on fingolimod for at least 1 year. The switch in therapy was due to significantly low CD4+ T lymphocyte count ≤65 cells/ul (normal range 490-1740 cells/ul), after discussing the results with the patients and the potential risk for opportunistic infections including cryptococcal infections. DMF was introduced following a washout period of 5 to 11 weeks to allow reconstitution of the immune system and for the absolute lymphocyte count to reach ≥500 cells/ul. Every patient who experienced a relapse had several enhancing lesions in the brain and/or spinal cord between 12 to 23 weeks after cessation of fingolimod and 1 to 18 weeks after starting DMF. All relapses were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone with good clinical responses. CONCLUSION: The anticipated beneficial response of DMF treatment to mitigate rebound after fingolimod therapy cessation was not observed. Our patients experienced rebound disease despite being on treatment with DMF. Additional studies are necessary to understand which treatments are most effective to transition to after discontinuing fingolimod.

Psychiatric Medication Changes Associated With Increased Rate of Medical Readmissions in Patients With Serious Mental Illness.

ABSTRACT: To identify the impact of postdischarge psychiatric medication changes on general medical readmissions among patients with serious mental illness (SMI; bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia), claims from a 5% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries hospitalized between 2013 and 2016 were studied. A total of 165,490 Medicare FFS beneficiaries with SMI 18 years or older with at least 1 year of continuous Medicare enrollment were identified. Within 30 days of discharge from index admission, 47.4% experienced a psychiatric medication change-including 75,892 beneficiaries experiencing a deletion and 55,713 experiencing an addition. After adjusting for potential confounders, those with a medication change experienced an 10% increase in the odds of 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 1.10; SE, 0.019; p < 0.001). Comorbid drug use disorder was also associated with an increased odds of readmission after controlling for other covariates. These findings suggest important factors that clinicians should be aware of when discharging patients with SMI.

Using the Case-Crossover Design to Assess Short-Term Risks of Bleeding and Arterial Thromboembolism After Switching Between Oral Anticoagulants in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Using nationwide Danish registries, we conducted a population-based case-crossover study evaluating the association between switching from a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and vice versa, and 30-day risks of bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The case-crossover population was identified among oral anticoagulant users during 2011-2018 (n = 123,217) as patients with AF with 1) a case-defining outcome and 2) an anticoagulant switch during the 180 days preceding the outcome. Odds ratios were estimated using conditional logistic regression by comparing the occurrence of switching during the 30-day window immediately preceding the outcome to that in reference windows in the same individual 60-180 days before the outcome. The case-crossover populations for switching from VKA to DOAC and DOAC to VKA comprised 1,382 and 287 case patients, respectively. Switching from VKA to DOAC, but not from DOAC to VKA, was associated with an increased short-term risk of bleeding (odds ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence intervals: 1.13, 1.79, and 1.06; and 0.64, 1.75, respectively) and ischemic stroke (odds ratio = 1.74; 95% confidence intervals: 1.21, 2.51, and 0.92; and 0.46, 1.83, respectively). Our findings suggest that switching from VKA to DOAC is an intermittent risk factor of bleeding and ischemic stroke in patients with AF.

Factors associated with ocular adverse event after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Ocular adverse events (OAEs) including vision-threatening intraocular inflammation after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment have been increasingly reported; however, the risk factors associated with OAEs remain elusive. Here, we determined the factors associated with OAEs after ICI treatment. We analyzed 40 consecutive patients who experienced OAEs after ICI treatments. The OAEs included anterior uveitis, chorioretinitis, papillitis, foveal interdigitation zone thickening/serous retinal detachment (IZT/SRD), retinal vascular occlusion, and strabismus and ptosis. Of 40 patients, 18 (45%) were treated with atezolizumab, 13 (33%) with pembrolizumab, 7 (18%) with nivolumab, 1 (3%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab, and the other 1 (3%) with durvalumab/tremelimumab. BRAF/MEK inhibitors were concurrently used in 19 (48%) patients. Occurrence of intraocular inflammation was significantly associated with previous ocular surgery and trauma history (P = 0.015) and pembrolizumab use (P = 0.031). Neuro-ophthalmic complications and IZT/SRD were associated with brain metastasis (P = 0.005) and treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitor (P < 0.001), respectively. In extensive literature review for clinical cases, we identified seven cases with intraocular inflammation, which were not observed with ipilimumab treatment, that occurred after a change of the drug to pembrolizumab. Collectively, these findings provide better understandings of OAEs after ICI treatment.

New variant in the IL1RN-gene (DIRA) associated with late-onset, CRMO-like presentation.

OBJECTIVE: To report a chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO)-like clinical phenotype with multisystem inflammation associated with a novel gene variant in the spectrum of IL-1-mediated diseases. METHODS: A 3-year-old boy presented with recurrent episodes of fever, serositis, pancreatitis and high inflammatory markers with onset at age 13 months. At age 3 years, he started limping. Imaging revealed multifocal pelvic bone inflammation suggestive of CRMO. Autoinflammation panel testing was non-contributory. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and advanced IL-1 pathway analysis was conducted. RESULTS: WES identified a novel homozygous interleukin receptor 1 (IL1RN) variant (c.62C>G; p. Ser21*) (NM_173842.2). Functional analysis of IL1RN mRNA and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) protein confirmed the diagnosis of a deficiency of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (DIRA). Treatment with the nonselective IL-1 inhibitor anakinra resulting in rapid remission; switch to the selective IL-1ß antagonist canakinumab led to a flare within 6 weeks. Re-start of anakinra recaptured remission, last documented at the recent 19-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a novel late-onset DIRA confirmed by advanced diagnostic testing. In patients with systemic inflammation and CRMO-like bone lesions, IL1RN testing should be considered; even in the absence of skin manifestations. Non-selective IL-1 inhibition is an effective therapy.

Switch from branded to generic imatinib: impact on molecular responses and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1-16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4-22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4-4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

Doing without valproate in women of childbearing potential with idiopathic generalized epilepsy: Implications on seizure outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Valproate (VPA) use in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) who are of reproductive age has been a matter of concern and debate, which eventually led to the recent restrictions by regulatory agencies. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between VPA avoidance/switch and seizure outcome in women of childbearing potential. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from female patients with IGE, 13-50 years of age, followed since 1980. We evaluated the prescription habits, and the rate of VPA switch for other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and its prognostic implications. Seizure remission (SR) was defined as the absence of any seizure type more than 18 months before the last medical observation. The main aim of the study was to assess (a) possible changes in seizure outcome related to VPA switch for other AEDs, especially in patients planning a pregnancy; and (b) possible differences in SR based on the presence/absence of VPA at last observation. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients were included in the study. Overall SR at last medical observation was 62.7%. SR significantly differed between subjects taking and those not taking VPA (P < .001) at last visit. Multiple regression models showed that taking VPA at last medical observation was strongly associated with SR in both the general population (P < .001) and the juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) group (P < .001). Thirty-six (70.6%) of 51 patients who switched from VPA during follow-up experienced a clinical worsening. Switching back to VPA was more frequently associated with SR at last observation (P < .001). In those patients who substituted VPA in view of a pregnancy, SR and drug burden (monotherapy vs polytherapy) differed significantly before and after the switch. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that VPA avoidance/switch might be associated with unsatisfactory seizure control in women with IGE who are of childbearing potential. Our findings further highlight the complexity of the therapeutic management of female patients of reproductive age.

Relationship of antiepileptic drugs to generic brittleness in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess if any antiepileptic drug (AED) was associated with patients being generic brittle (GB) and if any specific AED caused - and was not merely associated with - more frequent switch problems. METHODS: Chi square and binary logistical regression analysis were performed, using a previously described study in patients with epilepsy who were routinely followed at the University of Maryland epilepsy outpatient clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. Determination of generic brittleness mirrored clinical practice and included patient opinion about generic formulations, usually based on a history of worsened seizures or side effects with prior AED formulation switching. The dataset included a total of 148 patients, who took 30 different AED formulations. Patients collectively took 530 AED formulation products. RESULTS: Taking lamotrigine immediate release (IR) tablets was associated with a greater probability of being GB and tended to cause more frequent switch problems. Interestingly, six AEDs - Vimpat tablet, carbamazepine IR tablet, phenobarbital (any formulation), gabapentin capsule, Lyrica capsules, and phenytoin (any formulation) - were associated with a reduced probability of being GB, although perhaps not through greater efficacy and tolerability, or better formulation quality. Since tablet and capsule appearance may influence patient perceptions and clinical outcomes, it was observed that the six AEDs less associated with being GB also tended to have fewer generics, and hence possibly lessen treatment uncertainties from the patient perspective. A patient taking more AEDs had significantly increased odds of having a switch problem. An additional observation was that, when a generic was available for their most problematic AED, GB patients took a generic AED only 50% of the time, while not GB patients took a generic AED all the time. CONCLUSIONS: Taking lamotrigine IR tablets was associated with a greater probability of being GB and tended to cause more frequent switch problems than other AEDs in this cohort of patients. Six AEDs were associated with a reduced probability of being GB. The lower number of different generics for these six drugs may result in greater patient certainty in medication identity, due to greater consistency in medication color, shape, and size, and hence less generic skepticism or generic brittleness. Also, patients taking more AEDs showed increased odds of a switch problem.

Prasugrel effectively reduces the platelet reactivity units in patients with genetically metabolic dysfunction of cytochrome P450 2C19 who are treated with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is administered following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent implantation. Several studies have reported the effects of switching between P2Y12 inhibitors on platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reaction units: PRU), from acute to late phase after PCI. However, the effect of switching at very late phase is unknown. This study examined the effect on PRU in Japanese coronary heart disease patients with long-term DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) when switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median DAPT duration at enrollment was 1824.0 days. Twenty-three patients with PRU ≥ 208 at enrollment were randomly assigned into either continuing to receive clopidogrel (Continued Group; n = 11) or switching to prasugrel (Switched Group; n = 12). The primary endpoint was the rate of patients who achieved PRU < 208 at the end of 12 weeks of treatment, which was significantly higher in Switched Group relative to Continued Group (90.0% vs. 36.4%; P = 0.024). The secondary endpoint was the PRU at week 12 in groups subdivided according to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes. At week 12, extensive metabolizers (EM Group) had 202.3 ± 60.0 and 174.5 ± 22.3 in Continued Group and Switched Group (P = 0.591), respectively; intermediate and poor metabolizers (non-EM Group) had 229.4 ± 36.9 and 148.4 ± 48.4 in Continued Group and Switched Group (P = 0.002), respectively. The PRU for non-EM Group was significantly reduced in Switched Group. Thus, for patients with long-term DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) after PCI with coronary stent implantation, switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel resulted in a stable reduction in PRU, regardless of CYP2C19 polymorphism.

Transition of Patients with Opioid Use Disorder from Buprenorphine to Extended-Release Naltrexone: A Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Two Transition Regimens.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: When patients seek to discontinue buprenorphine (BUP) treatment, monthly injectable extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) may help them avoid relapse. The efficacy of low ascending doses of oral NTX vs placebo for patients transitioning from BUP to XR-NTX is evaluated in this study. METHODS: In a phase 3, hybrid residential/outpatient study, clinically stable participants with opioid use disorder (N = 101), receiving BUP for more than or equal to 3 months and seeking antagonist treatment, were randomized (1:1) to 7 residential days of descending doses of BUP and low ascending doses of oral NTX (NTX/BUP, n = 50) or placebo (PBO-N/BUP, n = 51). Both groups received standing ancillary medications and psychoeducational counseling. Following negative naloxone challenge, participants received XR-NTX (day 8). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who received and tolerated XR-NTX. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between groups for participants receiving a first dose of XR-NTX: 68.6% (NTX/BUP) vs 76.0% (PBO-N/BUP; P = .407). The mean number of days with peak Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score less than or equal to 12 during the treatment period (days 1-7) was similar for NTX/BUP and PBO-N/BUP groups (5.8 vs 6.3; P = .511). Opioid withdrawal symptoms during XR-NTX induction and post-XR-NTX observation period (days 8-11) were mild and similar between groups (mean peak COWS score: NTX/BUP, 5.1 vs PBO-N/BUP, 5.4; P = .464). Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Low ascending doses of oral NTX did not increase induction rates onto XR-NTX compared with placebo. The overall rate of successful induction across treatment groups supports a brief BUP taper with standing ancillary medications as a well-tolerated approach for patients seeking transition from BUP to XR-NTX. (Am J Addict 2020;00:00-00).

Neuropsychiatric outcomes before and after switching to dolutegravir-based therapy in an acute HIV cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is currently the first-line treatment for people living with HIV. Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NP-AEs) have been reported with DTG but neuropsychiatric symptoms have not been systemically quantified using structured scales. This study examined mood and cognitive parameters before and after a planned transition from non-DTG to DTG-based ART within a longitudinal study of acute HIV infection (AHI). METHODS: RV254 AHI cohort participants on ≥ 24 weeks of ART initiated at AHI underwent sequential assessments before and after the switch including: (1) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item survey (scores 0-27) that evaluates somatic and affective/cognitive symptoms of depression; (2) a 2-Questions screening that has been validated locally for depression; (3) Distress Thermometer (scores 0-10); and 4) administration of a 4-test neurocognitive battery sensitive to HIV. RESULTS: 254 individuals (95% male, median age 30) switched to a DTG-based regimen after a median 144 weeks of ART. Serial assessments were completed at a median of 19 weeks before and 37 weeks after DTG. There was a modest but statistically significant increase in PHQ-9 scores after DTG (pre-switch: 5 [IQR 1-7] vs. Post-switch: 5 [IQR 2-8], p = 0.009). The percentage of participants with at least moderate depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) increased from 10 to 16% (p = 0.006), but the frequency of moderate-severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) remained unchanged (3%). No volunteer reported NP-AEs within the study period. Somatic symptoms of depression increased more than cognitive/affective symptoms. Plasma viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50; p = 0.005) and PHQ-9 ≥ 10 (p < 0.001) before switch were linked to lower PHQ-9 scores after DTG in multivariable analysis. Performance on all neuropsychological tests, except grooved pegboard test, improved modestly after DTG (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After a median duration of 37 weeks of DTG use, there was a modest increase in the higher quartile of PHQ-9. This increase was associated with a rise in moderate depression symptoms but not the more severe forms of depression on PHQ-9. No clinically relevant NP-AEs were reported. Pre-existing depression was not associated with subsequent worsening of symptoms after DTG. Cognitive test performance improved post-DTG but could be due to practice effect.

Prescription switching: Rationales and risks.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug switching is commonplace across a broad range of indications and, within a drug class, is often facilitated by the availability of multiple drugs considered equivalent. Such treatment changes are often considered to improve outcomes via better efficacy or fewer side effects, or to be more cost-effective. Drug switching can be both appropriate and beneficial for several reasons; however, switching can also be associated with negative consequences. AIM: To consider the impact of switching in two situations: the use of statins as a well-studied example of within-class drug switching, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-targeting drug switching as an example of cross-class switching. RESULTS: With the example of statins, within-class switching may be justified to reduce side effects, although the decision to switch is often also driven by the lower cost of generic formulations. With the example of GnRH agonists/antagonists, switching often occurs without the realisation that these drugs belong to different classes, with potential clinical implications. CONCLUSION: Lessons emerging from these examples will help inform healthcare practitioners who may be considering switching drug prescriptions.

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as first-line regimen for acute ischemic stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: There are various patterns in determining the choice of the first-line antithrombotic agent for acute stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We investigated the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as first-line antithrombotics for patients with acute stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 24 h from stroke onset were included. On the basis of the first regimen used and the regimen within 7 days after admission, the study population was divided into three groups: 1) antiplatelet switched to warfarin (A-W), 2) antiplatelet switched to NOAC (A-N), and 3) NOAC only (N only). We compared the occurrence of early neurologic deterioration, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, systemic bleeding, and poor functional outcome at 90 days. RESULTS: Of 314 included patients, 164, 53, and 97 were classified into the A-W, A-N, and N only groups, respectively. Early neurologic deterioration was most frequently observed in the A-W group (9.1%), followed by the A-N (5.7%) and N only (1.0%) groups (p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders demonstrated that the N only group was independently associated with a lower rate of early neurologic deterioration (odds ratio [OR] 0.104, 95% CI 0.013-0.831) or poor functional outcome at 90 days (OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.215-0.940) than the A-W group. However, the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or any systemic bleeding event did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSION: Using non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants as the first-line regimen for acute ischemic stroke may help prevent early neurologic deterioration without increasing the bleeding risk.

Oral Anticoagulation in the Elderly: New Oral Anticoagulants-Innovative Solution for an Old Problem?

Direct oral anticoagulants emerge as the most innovative and promising drug toward preventing and treating cardiovascular disease, raising great interest among the scientific community. Numerous studies and meta-analysis generated much data clarifying clinicians' doubts; however, uncertainties remain regarding their use in particular groups such as patients with prosthetic valves, in valvular atrial fibrillation (defined as atrial fibrillation related to mitral rheumatic heart disease or prosthetic heart valves), among the elderly, in paraneoplastic thromboembolism, in pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic compromise, and scarcity of specific antidotes. This review article intends to condense the vast scientific production addressing new oral anticoagulants by focusing on their advantages and disadvantages when used on the elderly.

Switching medication products during the treatment of psychiatric illness.

BACKGROUND: The common practice of switching between branded (reference) medications and their corresponding generic products, between generic products, or even from a generic product to a branded medication during the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders may compromise efficacy and/or tolerability. METHODS: We assessed the published literature from March 1, 2010 through June 30, 2017 via PubMed using the MeSH term 'generics, drugs' alone and in combination with class-specific terms (e.g., 'anticonvulsants', 'mood stabilisers'), for studies detailing outcomes following product switches. RESULTS: Although some studies comparing the initiation of reference versus generic drugs suggest equivalence between products, several studies detailing a switch between reference and generic products describe reductions in efficacy, reduced medication adherence and persistence, and increased overall health care resource utilization and costs associated with generic substitution. CONCLUSION: When product switches are considered, they should only proceed with the full knowledge of both patient and provider.

Switching to coformulated rilpivirine (RPV), emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide from either RPV, FTC and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week results from two randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: The single-tablet regimen rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (RPV/FTC/TAF) for treatment of HIV-1-infected adults was approved based on bioequivalence. We assessed the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from either RPV/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF. METHODS: We conducted two distinct randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trials in participants taking RPV/FTC/TDF (Study 1216) and EFV/FTC/TDF (Study 1160). Each study randomized virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) adults (1:1) to switch to RPV/FTC/TAF or continue their current regimen for 96 weeks. We evaluated efficacy as the proportion with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL using the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and prespecified bone and renal endpoints at week 96. RESULTS: We randomized and treated 630 participants in Study 1216 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 316; RPV/FTC/TDF, n = 314) and 875 in Study 1160 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 438; EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 437). In both studies, the efficacy of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF was noninferior to that of continuing baseline therapy at week 96, with respective percentages of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL being 89.2% versus 88.5% in Study 1216 [difference 0.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to +5.8%] and 85.2% versus 85.1% in Study 1160 (difference 0%; 95% CI -4.8 to +4.8%). No participant on RPV/FTC/TAF developed treatment-emergent resistance versus two on EFV/FTC/TDF and one on RPV/FTC/TDF. Compared with continuing baseline therapy, significant improvements in bone mineral density and renal tubular markers were observed in the RPV/FTC/TAF groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was safe and effective and improved bone mineral density and renal biomarkers up to 96 weeks with no cases of treatment-emergent resistance.

Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy in patients converting from carbamazepine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of prior use of carbamazepine (CBZ) and other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with a putatively similar mechanism of action (inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels; VGSCs) on seizure outcomes and tolerability when converting to eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), using data pooled from 2 controlled conversion-to-ESL monotherapy trials (studies: 093-045, 093-046). METHODS: Adults with treatment-resistant focal (partial-onset) seizures were randomized 2:1 to ESL 1600 or 1200 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was study exit (meeting predefined exit criteria related to worsening seizure control) versus an historical control group. Other endpoints included change in seizure frequency, responder rate, and tolerability. Endpoints were analyzed for subgroups of patients who received CBZ (or any VGSC inhibitor [VGSCi]) during baseline versus those who received other AEDs. RESULTS: Of 365 patients in the studies, 332 were evaluable for efficacy. The higher risk of study exit in the subgroups that received CBZ (or any VGSCi) during baseline, versus other AEDs, was not statistically significant (hazard ratios were 1.49 for +CBZ vs -CBZ [P = .10] and 1.27 for +VGSCi vs. -VGSCi [P = .33]). Reductions in seizure frequency and responder rates were lower in patients who converted from CBZ or other VGSCi compared with those who converted from other AEDs. There were no notable differences in overall tolerability between subgroups, but the incidence of some adverse events (eg, dizziness, somnolence, nausea) differed between subgroups and/or between treatment periods. SIGNIFICANCE: Baseline use of CBZ or other major putative VGSC inhibitors did not appear to significantly increase the risk of study exit due to worsening seizure control, or to increase the frequency of side effects when converting to ESL monotherapy. However, bigger improvements in efficacy may be possible in patients converting to ESL monotherapy from an AED regimen that does not include a VGSC inhibitor.

Taking Warfarin with Heparin Replacement and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Is a Risk Factor for Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) remains problematic, especially in patients taking anticoagulants, there are differing views on the ideal and optimal management for these patients. This study investigated the risk of bleeding after ESD in patients taking anticoagulants. METHODS: We enrolled 61 consecutive patients taking anticoagulants (anticoagulant group) and 968 patients taking no antithrombotic agents (non-antithrombotic group) treated with ESD for EGC between December 2010 and October 2016. We analyzed the risk factors for bleeding after ESD in relation to the various clinical factors. RESULTS: Incidences of bleeding after ESD were significantly higher (14%; 11/76) in the anticoagulant group compared to the non-antithrombotic group (3%; 40/1,167). Moreover, bleeding after ESD was significantly more common in patients in the warfarin monotherapy group (14%; 5/37) and in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) monotherapy group (22%; 4/18), compared to the non-antithrombotic group. Multivariate analysis revealed that dialysis, the use of anticoagulants, and an operation time ≥75 min were independent risk factors for bleeding after ESD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients who take warfarin and receive heparin bridging, and those who take DOAC medication, are prone to bleeding after ESD for EGC.

Switch-associated adverse events: focus on olanzapine.

OBJECTIVES:: Switching between different antipsychotic therapies is a frequent occurrence in the management of patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. This paper provides a review of the principles of antipsychotic switching and discusses pharmacological principles underlying adverse events that occur while switching olanzapine to another antipsychotic medication. It offers suggestions for management of switch-associated adverse events in clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS:: Few publications explore olanzapine switch-related adverse events, the underlying pharmacological principles and appropriate switching strategies to minimise the risk of adverse events. There is still a need for further studies to verify existing knowledge and assist in the development of 'gold standard' guidelines that outline appropriate switching strategies and duration of the switching process to reduce and avoid adverse events.