Effects of rTMS combined with rPMS on stroke patients with arm paralysis after contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer: a case-series.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate the effect of rTMS combined with rPMS on stroke patients with arm paralysis after CSCNTS. METHODS: A case-series of four stroke patients with arm paralysis, ages ranging from 39 to 51 years, that underwent CSCNTS was conducted. Patients were treated with 10 HZ rTMS on the contralesional primary motor cortex combined with 20 HZ rPMS on groups of elbow and wrist muscles for 15 days. RESULTS: The muscle tone of elbow flexor muscle (EFM), elbow extensor muscle (EEM), wrist flexor muscle (WFM) and flexor digitorum (FD) reduced immediately after operation followed by increasing gradually. After rehabilitation, the muscle tone of EEM and EFM reduced by 14% and 11%, respectively. There was a 13% and 45% change ratio in WFM and FD. The numeric rating scale (mean = 5.75 ± 1.71) was significantly lower (mean = 3.25 ± 1.90, t = 8.66, p = .00). Grip and pinch strength (mean = 23.65 ± 4.91; mean = 4.9 ± 0.59) were significantly higher (mean = 34.63 ± 5.23, t = -61.07, p = .00; mean = 7.1 ± 0.73, t = -13.91, p = .00). CONCLUSIONS: The rehabilitation of stroke patients with arm paralysis after CSCNTS is a long, complicated process which includes great change of neuropathic pain, muscle tone, and muscle strength. In order to enhance the neural connection between the contralesional hemisphere and the hemiplegic limb, alleviate postoperative complications, as well as accelerate the rehabilitation process, we can consider to use rTMS combined with rPMS.

Trial of Contralateral Seventh Cervical Nerve Transfer for Spastic Arm Paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Spastic limb paralysis due to injury to a cerebral hemisphere can cause long-term disability. We investigated the effect of grafting the contralateral C7 nerve from the nonparalyzed side to the paralyzed side in patients with spastic arm paralysis due to chronic cerebral injury. METHODS: We randomly assigned 36 patients who had had unilateral arm paralysis for more than 5 years to undergo C7 nerve transfer plus rehabilitation (18 patients) or to undergo rehabilitation alone (18 patients). The primary outcome was the change from baseline to month 12 in the total score on the Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity scale (scores range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better function). Results The mean increase in Fugl-Meyer score in the paralyzed arm was 17.7 in the surgery group and 2.6 in the control group (difference, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 12.2 to 17.9; P<0.001). With regard to improvements in spasticity as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (an assessment of five joints, each scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more spasticity), the smallest between-group difference was in the thumb, with 6, 9, and 3 patients in the surgery group having a 2-unit improvement, a 1-unit improvement, or no change, respectively, as compared with 1, 6, and 7 patients in the control group (P=0.02). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional imaging showed connectivity between the ipsilateral hemisphere and the paralyzed arm. There were no significant differences from baseline to month 12 in power, tactile threshold, or two-point discrimination in the hand on the side of the donor graft. RESULTS: The mean increase in Fugl-Meyer score in the paralyzed arm was 17.7 in the surgery group and 2.6 in the control group (difference, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 12.2 to 17.9; P<0.001). With regard to improvements in spasticity as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (an assessment of five joints, each scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more spasticity), the smallest between-group difference was in the thumb, with 6, 9, and 3 patients in the surgery group having a 2-unit improvement, a 1-unit improvement, or no change, respectively, as compared with 1, 6, and 7 patients in the control group (P=0.02). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional imaging showed connectivity between the ipsilateral hemisphere and the paralyzed arm. There were no significant differences from baseline to month 12 in power, tactile threshold, or two-point discrimination in the hand on the side of the donor graft. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center trial involving patients who had had unilateral arm paralysis due to chronic cerebral injury for more than 5 years, transfer of the C7 nerve from the nonparalyzed side to the side of the arm that was paralyzed was associated with a greater improvement in function and reduction of spasticity than rehabilitation alone over a period of 12 months. Physiological connectivity developed between the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere and the paralyzed hand. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, 13004466 .).

Combination of pregabalin and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain in a stroke patient after contralateral C7 nerve transfer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Contralateral C7 nerve transfer is a new surgical treatment for stroke patients with unilateral upper extremity paralysis, but neuropathic pain in the nonparalyzed side is the common complication after surgery. We report a stroke patient with neuropathic pain after C7 nerve transfer who received combination treatment of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS) and pregabalin. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year old, 6 months post-stroke patient with right hemiplegia after contralateral C7 nerve transfer was admitted in our department with a significant neuropathic pain in his left upper extremity. The treatment of pregabalin and TENS were used for patient. The visual analogue scale(VAS), medical outcomes study sleep scale(MOS-SS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS) were assessed after 1 months treatment. After treatment, the pain of his nonparalyzed upper extremity was relieved, the sleeping quality and the anxiety and depression were improved in patient. CONCLUSION: This report suggests that the combination of pregabalin and TENS have prominent clinical effects on neuropathic pain of nonparalyzed side in stroke patients after contralateral C7 nerve transfer.

Lower subscapular nerve transfer for axillary nerve repair in upper brachial plexus palsy.

BACKGROUND: The potential to utilize the lower subscapular nerve for brachial plexus surgery has been suggested in many anatomical studies. However, we know of no studies in the literature describing the use of the lower subscapular nerve for axillary nerve reconstruction to date. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of this nerve transfer in patients with upper brachial plexus palsy. METHODS: Of 1340 nerve reconstructions in 568 patients with brachial plexus injury performed by the senior author (P.H.), a subset of 18 patients underwent axillary nerve reconstruction using the lower subscapular nerve and constitutes the patient group for this study. The median age was 48 years, and the median time between trauma and surgery was 6 months. A concomitant radial nerve injury was found in 8 patients. RESULTS: Thirteen patients completed a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Successful deltoid recovery was defined as (1) muscle strength MRC grade ≥ 3, (2) electromyographic signs of reinnervation, and (3) increase in deltoid muscle mass. Axillary nerve reconstruction was successful in 9 of 13 patients, which represents a success rate of 69.2%. No significant postoperative weakness of shoulder internal rotation or adduction was observed after transecting the lower subscapular nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The lower subscapular nerve can be used as a safe and effective neurotization tool for upper brachial plexus injury, having a success rate of 69.2% for axillary nerve repair. Our technique presents a suitable alternative for patients with concomitant radial nerve injury.

Intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in patients with complete traumatic brachial plexus injuries: case series.

BACKGROUND: To recover biceps strength in patients with complete brachial plexus injuries, the intercostal nerve can be transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. The surgical results are very controversial, and most of the studies with good outcomes and large samples were carried out in Asiatic countries. The objective of the study was to evaluate biceps strength after intercostal nerve transfer in patients undergoing this procedure in a Western country hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients from 2011 to 2016 with traumatic brachial plexus injuries receiving intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in a rehabilitation hospital. The biceps strength was graded using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale. The variables reported and analyzed were age, the time between trauma and surgery, surgeon experience, body mass index, nerve receptor (biceps motor branch or musculocutaneous nerve), and the number of intercostal nerves transferred. Statistical tests, with a significance level of 5%, were used. RESULTS: Biceps strength recovery was graded ≥M3 in 19 patients (48.8%) and M4 in 15 patients (38.5%). There was no statistical association between biceps strength and the variables. The most frequent complication was a pleural rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer is a safe procedure. Still, biceps strength after surgery was ≥M3 in only 48.8% of the patients. Other donor nerve options should be considered, e.g., the phrenic or spinal accessory nerves.

Differences in strength fatigue when using different donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of elbow flexion strength fatigue, rather than the maximal power of strength, after brachial plexus re-innervation with phrenic and spinal accessory nerves. We designed a simple but specific test to study whether statistical differences were observed among those two donor nerves. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe brachial plexus palsy for which either phrenic nerve (PN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer was performed. A dynamometer was used to determine the maximal contraction strength. One and two kilograms circular weights were utilized to measure isometrically the duration of submaximal and near-maximal contraction time. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with a PN transfer while 7 with a SAN transfer for elbow flexion. The mean time from trauma to surgery was 7.1 months for spinal accessory nerve versus 5.2 for phrenic nerve, and the mean follow-up was 57.7 and 38.6 months, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a quicker fatigue for the PN, such that patients with the SAN transfer could hold weights of 1 kg and 2 kg for a mean of 91.0 and 61.6 s, respectively, while patients with transfer of the phrenic nerve could hold 1 kg and 2 kg weights for just a mean of 41.7 and 19.6 s, respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (at p = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). Upon correlation analysis, endurances at 1 kg and 2 kg were strongly correlated, with r = 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that phrenic to musculocutaneous nerve transfer showed an increased muscular fatigue when compared with spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous transfer. Further studies designed to analyze this relation should be performed to increase our knowledge about strength endurance/fatigue and muscle re-innervation.

Reanimation of triceps muscle using ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the nerve to long head of the triceps muscle.

BACKGROUND: Triceps muscle serves an important role in extension of the elbow. Its action is required for reaching out objects without using the trunk. Elbow extension is an important function for natural stabilization of the elbow. The aim of this study was to evaluate restoration of elbow extension in adults suffering triceps muscle palsy with various causes, by using transfer of a fascicle of ulnar nerve to the long head of triceps branch of the radial nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present case series, 7 patients with partial brachial plexus injury or posterior cord injury, where triceps muscle was involved, were subjected to motor fascicle of ulnar nerve transfer to the nerve to long head of triceps for restoration of elbow extension. Follow-ups, including EMG-NCV (electromyography-nerve conduction velocity) 6 and 12 months after surgery and elbow extension muscle strength using MRC grading, were carried out. RESULTS: Six patients (85.71%) achieved a functional muscle strength of M4 for their elbow extension. In all of the patients, re-innervation was discovered using EMG-NCV. CONCLUSION: This surgical technique (ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to long head of the triceps) for improving elbow extension is promising in patients with brachial plexus injury.

Comparative study of single and dual nerve transfers for repairing shoulder abduction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of single and dual nerve transfer for the repair of shoulder abduction in patients with upper or upper and middle trunk root avulsion. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with C5-C6 or C5-C7 root avulsion treated by nerve transfer in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different operation methods. In group A, ten patients had transferred the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Ten patients in group B underwent dual nerve transfer to reconstruct shoulder abduction, including the spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and two intercostal nerves or the long head of triceps nerve branch transfer to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. There was no difference in age, preoperative interval, follow-up time, and injury type between the two groups. We used shoulder abduction strength, shoulder abduction angle, and Samardzic's shoulder joint evaluation standard as the postoperative evaluation index. Shoulder abductor muscle strength equals or above M3 was considered to be an effective recovery. RESULTS: Of the 20 cases, 15 obtained equals or more M3 of shoulder abduction strength, and the overall effective rate was 75%. The effective rate of shoulder abduction power in group A was 60% (6/10) while group B was 90% (9/10); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The average shoulder abduction angle was 55° (SD = 19.29) in group A and 77° (SD = 20.44) in group B; the angle was significantly better in group B than that in group A (p < 0.05). Based on Samardzic's standard, the excellent and good rate of group A was 90% and in group B was 50%. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients with nerve root avulsion of C5-C6 or C5-C7, repairing suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve at the same time is more effective than repairing suprascapular nerve alone in terms of shoulder abduction angle and excellent rate of functional recovery of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we recommend the repair of the suprascapular nerve and the axillary nerve simultaneously if conditions permit.

Translocation of the soleus muscular branch of the tibial nerve to repair high common peroneal nerve injury.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical effect of translocating the soleus muscular branch of the tibial nerve to repair the deep peroneal nerve. METHODS: Eight patients were treated for high common peroneal nerve injury. The deep peroneal nerve was separated out from the common peroneal nerve if no injury occurred upon opening the epineurium of the common peroneal nerve. The soleus muscular branch of the tibial nerve was then translocated to the deep peroneal nerve. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 21.75 months. Electromyography revealed newly appearing electric potentials in the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor toe longus muscle at 8 to 10 months postoperatively. Four patients showed good functional recovery after surgery; functional recovery was poor in other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Translocation of the soleus muscle branch is a feasible method to treat high common peroneal nerve injuries. A full understanding of the indications for this operation is required.

Double nerve transfer for restoration of hand grasp and release in C7 tetraplegia following complete cervical spinal cord injury.

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause tetraplegia. Nerve transfer has been routinely utilized for reconstruction of hand in brachial plexus injuries. Here, we report reconstruction of finger flexion (hand grasp) and extension (hand release) in a victim of cervical spinal cord injury with tetraplegia. We also focus on importance of extension phase in restoration of hand function in the tetraplegic case, in addition to provision of a detailed description of both operations including text, photographs, and a video. We used double nerve transfer, namely brachialis branches of musculocutaneous nerve to anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and supinator branch of radial nerve to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). We found that brachialis nerve transfer to AIN (for finger flexion) and supinator branch nerve transfer to PIN (for finger extension) can provide finger flexion and extension simultaneously. Brachialis nerve transfer to AIN and supinator branch nerve transfer to PIN may be an acceptable surgical technique to restore hand grasp and release in tetraplegia after SCI.

Outcome after brachial plexus injury surgery and impact on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after surgery for brachial plexus injury (BPI), not only motor outcomes but also the quality of life of the patients. METHODS: We operated on 128 consecutive patients with BPI from 1992 to 2012. We documented the information on the injured nerve, level of injury, type of treatment used, timing of surgery, patient age, and preoperative and postoperative motor deficits. In 69 patients who agreed to participate in a quality of life study, additional assessments included functionality, pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and psychosocial health. RESULTS: Of patients who underwent only exploration and neurolysis, 35.3% showed a good quality of recovery. Patients who underwent nerve reconstruction using nerve grafting showed a better rate of good quality recovery (56.7%), and the results following nerve transfer depended on the type of transfer used. After surgery, 82.6% of patients showed significant improvement, 82.6% were satisfied, and 81.2% responded positively when asked if they would undergo surgery again if they knew the current result beforehand. Overall, 69.6% patients continued working after surgery. The mean DASH disability score was high (58.7) in the study group. Patients who had early surgery showed a consistently higher DASH score. About 76% of patients reported having pain regularly, and 18.8% reported depression or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that it is important to report not only muscle recovery, but also other aspects of recovery.

Treatment of complete facial palsy in adults: comparative study between direct hemihypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy, hemihipoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with grafts, and masseter to facial nerve transfer.

BACKGROUND: The hypoglossal (with or without grafts) and masseter nerves are frequently used as axon donors for facial reinnervation when no proximal stump of the facial nerve is available. We report our experience treating facial nerve palsies via hemihypoglossal-to-facial nerve transfers either with (HFG) or without grafts (HFD), comparing these outcomes against those of masseteric-to-facial nerve transfers (MF). METHOD: A total of 77 patients were analyzed retrospectively, including 51 HFD, 11 HFG, and 15 MF nerve transfer patients. Both the House-Brackmann (HB) scale and our own, newly-designed scale to rate facial reanimation post nerve transfer (quantifying symmetry at rest and when smiling, eye occlusion, and eye and mouth synkinesis when speaking) were used to enumerate the extent of recovery. RESULTS: With both the HB and our own facial reanimation scale, the HFD and MF procedures yielded better outcome scores than HFG, though only the HGD was statistically superior. HGD produced slightly better scores than MF for everything but eye synkinesis, but these differences were generally not statistically significant. Delaying surgery beyond 2 years since injury was associated with appreciably worse outcomes when measured with our own but not the HB scale. The only predictors of outcome were the surgical technique employed and the duration of time between the initial injury and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: HFD appears to produce the most satisfactory facial reanimation results, with MF providing lesser but still satisfactory outcomes. Using interposed grafts while performing hemihypoglossal-to-facial nerve transfers should likely be avoided, whenever possible.

Gracilis microneurovascular transfer for facial paralysis.

Facial nerve dysfunction occurs in varying degrees of severity due to several causes, and leads to asymmetric or absent facial movements. Regardless of the etiology, facial nerve dysfunction can be functionally and psychologically devastating. Many techniques to restore facial symmetry both at rest and with motion have been pursued throughout history. Within the past 30 years, free muscle microneurovascular transfer techniques have been developed to provide symmetric motion to the face. The aim of this article is to describe one of the most common and reliable techniques to restore midface mobility, namely, gracilis microneurovascular transfer.

Iatrogenic burn caused by an operating microscope: case report.

We present a patient who experienced a burn from an operating microscope during surgery for a brachial plexus birth palsy, a literature review, and recommendations on how to avoid such injuries.

Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Review of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management with Nerve Transfers.

BACKGROUND: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a devastating neurologic condition in children, manifesting as acute limb weakness and/or paralysis. Despite increased awareness of AFM following initiation of U.S. surveillance in 2014, no treatment consensus exists. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the most current knowledge regarding AFM epidemiology, cause, clinical features, diagnosis, and supportive and operative management, including nerve transfer. METHODS: The authors systematically reviewed the literature based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using multiple databases to search the keywords ("acute flaccid myelitis"), ('acute flaccid myelitis'/exp OR 'acute flaccid myelitis'), and (Acute AND flaccid AND myelitis). Included articles reported on (1) AFM diagnosis and (2) patient-specific data regarding epidemiology, cause, clinical features, diagnostic features, or management of AFM. RESULTS: Ninety-nine articles were included in this review. The precise cause and pathophysiologic mechanism of AFM remain undetermined, but AFM is strongly associated with nonpolio enterovirus infections. Clinical presentation typically comprises preceding viral prodrome, pleocytosis, spinal cord lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and acute onset of flaccid weakness/paralysis with hyporeflexia in at least one extremity. Supportive care includes medical therapy and rehabilitation. Early studies of nerve transfer for AFM have shown favorable outcomes for patients with persistent weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Supportive care and physical therapy are the foundation of a multidisciplinary approach to managing AFM. For patients with persistent limb weakness, nerve transfer has shown promise for improving function in distal muscle groups. Surgeons must consider potential spontaneous recovery, patient selection, donor nerve availability, recipient nerve appropriateness, and procedure timing.

V to VII Nerve Transfer for Smile Reanimation.

Using the wording "facial reanimation," surgeons mean restoring movements to the paralyzed face. According to the condition of mimic muscle, facial palsy can be classified as recent (mimic muscle still alive) and chronic (atrophy of mimic muscle) palsy. The treatment is quite different because in the former group the mimic muscles can be still used so long as a new motor source would be connected to the damaged facial nerve. In the latter group, muscular transplantation is needed to substitute the atrophied mimic muscles of the middle part of the face. In both cases, the neural impulse that makes the muscles (mimic muscle in the former, transplanted muscle in the latter) move come from a new motor nerve. Nowadays, the masseteric nerve is widely used as a new motor source in recent facial reanimation; the same nerve has also a main role in the treatment of both chronic facial palsy where it is used as the new nervous stimulus for the new transplanted muscle and facial paresis where the nervous stimulus coming from the masseteric nerve is used to empower the stimulus coming from the injured facial nerve. The masseteric nerve can be usually connected directly to the facial nerve without the interposition of a nerve graft, with a faster reinnervation. Moreover, the use of the masseteric nerve gives no morbidity to the masticatory functions.

Brain plasticity and age after restoring elbow flexion with distal nerve transfers in neonatal brachial plexus palsy and nonneonatal traumatic brachial plexus injury using the plasticity grading scale.

OBJECTIVE: Ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfers are used to restore elbow flexion following severe neonatal and nonneonatal brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). Restoring volitional control requires plastic changes in the brain. To date, whether the potential for plasticity is influenced by a patient's age remains unknown. METHODS: Patients who had presented with a traumatic upper (C5-6 or C5-7) BPI were divided into two groups: neonatal brachial plexus palsies (NBPPs) and nonneonatal traumatic BPIs (NNBPIs). Both groups underwent ulnar or median nerve transfers to the MCN for elbow flexion restoration between January 2002 and July 2020. Only those who attained a British Medical Research Council strength rating of 4 were reviewed. The primary comparison between the two groups was the plasticity grading scale (PGS) score to determine the level of independence of elbow flexion (target) from forearm motor muscle movement (donors). The authors also assessed patient compliance with rehabilitation using a 4-point Rehabilitation Quality Scale. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify intergroup differences. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients were analyzed: 22 with NBPP (mean age at surgery 10 months) and 44 with NNBPI (age range at surgery 3-67 years, mean 30.2 years; mean time to surgery 7 months, p < 0.001). All NBPP patients obtained a PGS grade of 4 at the final follow-up versus just 47.7% of NNBPI patients (mean 3.27, p < 0.001). On ordinal regression analysis, after nature of the injury was excluded because of excessive collinearity with age, age was the only significant predictor of plasticity (ß = -0.063, p = 0.003). Median rehabilitation compliance scores were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of plastic changes that occur for patients to regain volitional control over elbow flexion after upper arm distal nerve transfers following BPI is influenced by patient age, with complete plastic rewiring more likely in younger patients and virtually ubiquitous in infants. Older patients should be informed that elbow flexion after an ulnar or median nerve fascicle transfer to the MCN might require simultaneous wrist flexion.

Resolving Co-Contraction of the Elbow in Patient with Sequelae of Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy can cause deformities of the upper extremity in up to 92% of patients. Elbow reconstruction is difficult because co-contraction of the elbow flexor (EF) and elbow extensor (EE) muscles makes the traditional treatment strategy ineffective. The authors propose a novel strategy to minimize the effect of co-contraction, comprising transfer of an EF to the triceps and a staged gracilis muscle transplantation [functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT)] to augment EF. The authors hypothesize this will lead to improved elbow flexion and extension, as well as decreased elbow flexion contracture. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients who received a gracilis FFMT for EF after EF-to-EE transfer was performed. EF/EE strength and range of motion data were collected from the last clinical visit. Patients were excluded if they had fewer than 1.5 years of follow-up. A control group with sequelae of obstetric brachial plexus palsy and nonsurgical treatment was used for comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. Average age at muscle transfer was 7.6 ± 5.5 years (range, 3 to 22 years) and at gracilis FFMT was 10.4 ± 6.0 years (range, 5 to 26 years). Average follow-up was 7.3 ± 6.5 years (range, 1.5 to 14.8 years). After EF-to-EE transfer, EE strength increased significantly from Medical Research Council grade 2.2 ± 0.4 to 3.4 ± 0.5 ( P < 0.0001) and EF decreased from 3.2 ± 1.1 to 1.1 ± 1.1 ( P < 0.0001) and recovered to grade 3.3 ± 0.7 after gracilis FFMT. EF contracture was significantly lower compared with that in the nonsurgical cohort ( P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo EF-to-EE transfer followed by gracilis FFMT have equivalent EF strength with significantly improved EE and improved elbow flexion contracture. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Targeted muscle reinnervation: a brief history of a promising procedure for effective management of amputation pain.

Each year, 27.5% of the 150 000 people in the United States who require lower extremity amputation experience significant postoperative complications, including pain, infection, and need for reoperation. Postamputation pain, including RLP and PLP, is debilitating. While the causes of such pain remain unknown, neuroma formation following sensory nerve transection is believed to be a major contributor. Various techniques exist for management of a symptomatic neuroma, but few data exist on which technique is superior. Furthermore, there are few data on primary prevention of neuroma formation following injury or intentional transection. The TMR technique shows promise for both management of PLP and RLP and prevention of neuroma formation. Following amputation, transected sensory nerves are coapted to nearby motor nerve supplying remaining extremity musculature. Not only does this procedure generate increased myoelectric signals for improved prosthesis control, TMR appears to neurophysiologically alter sensory nerves, preventing formation of painful sensory neuromas. The sole RCT to date evaluating the efficacy of TMR showed statistically significant reduction in PLP. TMR is not limited to use in the setting of major limb amputation. It has also been used in the setting of post-mastectomy pain, abdominal wall neuromas, digital amputations, and headache surgeries. This article reviews the origin of TMR and provides a brief description of histologic changes following the procedure, as well as current data regarding the efficacy of TMR with regard to postoperative pain relief. It also seeks to provide a concise, comprehensive resource for providers to facilitate better discussions with patients about treatment options.