Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Malar J ; 23(1): 290, 2024 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39334244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In May 2019, Ghana piloted the introduction of RTS,S malaria vaccine into routine immunization in 42 districts of seven of the 16 regions. The RTS,S malaria vaccine implementation programme (MVIP) post-introduction evaluation (PIE) conducted in Ghana, assessed the immunization system as well as healthcare worker and caregiver experiences during the phase-one rollout but was less expressive on quantitative grading of the respective thematic areas of the vaccine introduction plan. Given the utility of summary statistics in programme evaluation and communication, this follow-up study aimed to provide an overall rating of the country's performance regarding the MVIP . METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 10th January to 5th February 2024. It involved review of records to assess key thematic areas of the national MVIP plan, using a study tool adapted from the WHO New Vaccine Introduction (NVI) checklist. A composite score ranging from zero to 100 per cent was generated to assess the country's overall performance regarding introduction of the malaria vaccine, rated on a Likert scale as comprehensive, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS: The overall performance in the MVIP was rated 78.9% (30/38) corresponding to a grading of "good" on the Likert scale. Performance indicators under thematic areas including policy, national coordination mechanisms, waste management, health worker training, and pharmacovigilance were completely achieved. However,  some weaknesses were exhibited in areas such as financial consideration, cold chain, logistics, and vaccine management, and monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSION: Ghana's MVIP demonstrated remarkable strengths worth leveraging  to improve the national immunization programme. The weaknesses observed in some of the thematic areas present opportunities to engage key immunization partners and stakeholders towards aligning efforts to ensure a more robust expansion phase. The lessons from the MVIP may be relevant to areas introducing malaria vaccine irrespective of the product type-RTS,S or R21.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização , Vacinas Antimaláricas , Gana , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Malária/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
2.
Malar J ; 23(1): 305, 2024 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39390541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The RTS,S malaria vaccine has been prequalified for use in endemic settings prioritizing areas with moderate to high disease transmission. The impact of a vaccine at the population level may differ from observations during clinical trial due to programmatic, and individual-related factors, among others. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the RTS,S malaria vaccine on uncomplicated malaria among children aged 12-59 months in the Phase IV study districts, Upper East Region, Ghana. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using routine malaria surveillance data for the period 2020-2022. The burden of uncomplicated malaria was compared between the implementing (Kasena Nankana East and West districts) and comparator areas (Builsa North and South districts). The impact of RTS,S malaria vaccine was assessed by estimating the percentage reduction in uncomplicated malaria and incidence averted in the implementing area, accounting for the effect of confounders. RESULTS: Over 50,000 episodes of uncomplicated malaria among children aged 12-59 months were included in the study. Uncomplicated malaria was reduced by 33% (95%CI 29-36) over the entire study period, but the malaria incidence averted declined from 324/1,000 (95% CI 298-339; p < 0.0001) in 2020 to 287/1000 (95% CI 274-299; p < 0.0001) in 2022. CONCLUSION: The RTS,S malaria vaccine significantly reduced the burden of uncomplicated malaria among children aged 12-59 months in the implementing area. The sequential marginal declines in malaria incidence averted over the study period might be due to waning of protective immunity and acquisition of natural immunity as children age. Strengthening uptake of the currently recommended vaccines and other malaria control interventions is required to improve public health impact.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Gana/epidemiologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Malária/prevenção & controle , Malária/epidemiologia , Incidência , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia
3.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 586, 2023 03 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a public health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa with the region contributing to more than 90% of global cases in 2020. In Ghana, the malaria vaccine was piloted to assess the feasibility, safety, and its impact in the context of routine use alongside the existing recommended malaria control measures. To obtain context-specific evidence that could inform future strategies of introducing new vaccines, a standardized post-introduction evaluation (PIE) of the successes and challenges of the malaria vaccine implementation programme (MVIP) was conducted. METHODS: From September to December 2021, the WHO Post-Introduction Evaluation (PIE) tool was used to conduct a mixed methods evaluation of the MVIP in Ghana. To ensure representativeness, study sites and participants from the national level, 18 vaccinating districts, and 54 facilities from six of the seven pilot regions were purposively selected. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using data collection tools that were adapted based on the WHO PIE protocol. We performed summary descriptive statistics on quantitative data, thematic analysis on qualitative data, and triangulation of the results from both sets of analyses. RESULTS: About 90.7% (49/54) of health workers stated that the vaccine introduction process was smooth and contributed to an overall improvement of routine immunisation services. About 87.5% (47/54) of healthcare workers, and 95.8% (90/94) of caregivers accepted RTS,S malaria vaccine. Less than half [46.3%; (25/54)] of the healthcare workers participated in the pre-vaccine introduction training but almost all [94.4%; (51/54)] were able to constitute and administer the vaccine appropriately. About 92.5% (87/94) of caregivers were aware of the RTS,S introduction but only 44.0% (44/94) knew the number of doses needed for maximum protection. Health workers believed that the MVIP has had a positive impact on under five malaria morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The malaria vaccine has been piloted successfully in Ghana. Intensive advocacy; community engagement, and social mobilization; and regular onsite supportive supervision are critical enablers for successful introduction of new vaccines. Stakeholders are convinced of the feasibility of a nationwide scale up using a phased subnational approach taking into consideration malaria epidemiology and global availability of vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Malária , Humanos , Gana/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Malária/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Pessoal de Saúde
4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(10): ofae539, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39364172

RESUMO

Background: Ghana introduced a 2-dose schedule rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix, into childhood immunization in 2012 but switched to a 3-dose schedule vaccine, Rotavac, in 2020 on account of programmatic advantages offered by the latter, including lower cost per fully immunized child and lower cold chain volume requirement. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of the vaccine switch on the trends of rotavirus vaccine uptake and health facility outpatient department (OPD) attendance due to diarrhea among children aged 1-11 months. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on childhood immunization and diarrhea surveillance data for 2018-2022. The uptake of the different rotavirus vaccine products and the proportion of health facility OPD attendance attributed to diarrhea, respectively, were compared between the pre- and postswitch study periods. Results: The uptake of rotavirus vaccine was sustained following the switch. There were no significant differences in vaccination coverages (rota1, Rotarix coverage [94.3%], vs rota1, Rotavac coverage [95.3%]; P = .757; rota2, Rotarix coverage [91.3%], vs rota2, Rotavac coverage [92.7%]; P = .789). The proportions of health facility OPD attendance due to diarrhea were comparable (preswitch [12.4%] vs postswitch [12.1%]; P = .838). Conclusions: Ghana's rotavirus vaccine switch yielded expected programmatic benefits without any untoward effects. The trends of vaccine uptake and reduction in diarrhea morbidity were sustained. These experiences and lessons from the rotavirus vaccine switch are vital for potential switches for other vaccines in the current immunization schedule to mitigate the annual vaccine expenditure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA