A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pancreas Cancer in 2016: A Review.

In this article, we review our multidisciplinary approach for patients with pancreatic cancer. Specifically, we review the epidemiology, diagnosis and staging, biliary drainage techniques, selection of patients for surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and discuss other palliative interventions. The areas of active research investigation and where our knowledge is limited are emphasized.

Comparison of hepatic MDCT, MRI, and DSA to explant pathology for the detection and treatment planning of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnosis and treatment plan for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be made from radiologic imaging. However, lesion detection may vary depending on the imaging modality. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivities of hepatic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection of HCC and the consequent management impact on potential liver transplant patients. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen HCC lesions were analyzed in 41 patients who received an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). All of the patients underwent pretransplantation hepatic DSA, MDCT, and/or MRI. The imaging results were independently reviewed retrospectively in a blinded fashion by two interventional and two abdominal radiologists. The liver explant pathology was used as the gold standard for assessing each imaging modality. RESULTS: The sensitivity for overall HCC detection was higher for cross-sectional imaging using MRI (51.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]=36.2-58.4%) and MDCT (49.8%, 95% CI=43.7-55.9%) than for DSA (41.7%, 95% CI=36.2-47.3%) (P=0.05). The difference in false-positive rate was not statistically significant between MRI (22%), MDCT (29%), and DSA (29%) (P=0.67). The sensitivity was significantly higher for detecting right lobe lesions than left lobe lesions for all modalities (MRI: 56.1% vs. 43.1%, MDCT: 55.0% vs. 42.0%, and DSA: 46.9% vs. 33.9%; all P<0.01). The sensitivities of the three imaging modalities were also higher for lesions ≥2 cm vs. <2 cm (MRI: 73.4% vs. 32.7%, MDCT: 66.9% vs. 33.8%, and DSA: 62.2% vs. 24.1%; all P<0.01). The interobserver correlation was rated as very good to excellent. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity for detecting HCC is higher for MRI and MDCT than for DSA, and so cross-sectional imaging modalities should be used to evaluate OLT candidacy.

Hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: chemo- or bland embolization?

INTRODUCTION: Aggressive management of hepatic neuroendocrine (NE) metastases improves symptoms and prolongs survival. Because of the rarity of these tumors, however, the best method for hepatic artery embolization has not been established. We hypothesized that in patients with hepatic NE metastases, hepatic artery chemoembolization (HACE) would result in better symptom improvement and survival compared to bland embolization (HAE). METHODS: Retrospective review identified all patients with NE hepatic metastases managed by HACE or HAE at three institutions from January 1996 through December 2007. RESULTS: We identified 100 patients managed by HACE (n = 49) or HAE (n = 51) that were similar with respect to age, gender, and primary tumor type. The percentage of patients experiencing morbidity, 30-day mortality, and symptom improvement were similar between the two groups (HACE vs. HAE: 2.4% vs. 6.6%; 0.8% vs. 1.8%; and 88% vs. 83%, respectively.) No differences in the median overall survival were observed between HACE and HAE from the time of the first embolization procedure (25.5 vs. 25.7 months, p = 0.79). Multivariate analysis revealed that resection of the primary tumor predicted survival (73.8 vs. 19.4 months, p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that morbidity, mortality, symptom improvement, and overall survival are similar in patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases managed by chemo- or bland hepatic artery embolization.

Time to hemostasis after traction removal of tunneled cuffed central venous catheters.

PURPOSE: Many patients undergo placement of tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (TCCVCs) for indications including administration of medical therapy and hemodialysis. They are removed when no longer needed or if there is a device complication. There is no consensus regarding the necessity of routine preremoval coagulation studies or platelet count, so this study was performed to determine if abnormal coagulation status affects the time to hemostasis (TH) after traction removal of TCCVCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients referred to our group for removal of a TCCVC placed via a jugular or subclavian route were considered candidates for inclusion. Blood was submitted for evaluation of prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count. Catheters were removed with the traction technique, and presence of hemostasis was assessed at 5-minute intervals of manual compression. RESULTS: Between November 19, 2001, and April 20, 2004, 179 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. There were 165 subjects in whom TH was within the first 5-minute interval and 14 in whom more than 5 minutes was required. Statistically significant factors associated with prolonged TH were primary diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (P = .005), use of antiplatelet agents (P = .03), and procedure performed by a "low-volume" operator (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Routine preremoval evaluation of coagulation parameters is not necessary. Patients who are likely to have abnormal platelet function but not abnormal platelet number appear to be at risk for prolonged TH, but even in those cases, the THs are rarely more than 15 minutes.

Stent placement in common carotid and internal carotid artery stenoses with use of an open transcervical approach in a patient with previous endarterectomy.

In this article, a patient with extensive cerebrovascular disease who had previously undergone bilateral carotid endarterectomy and subsequent operative revision on the left side is described. The patient developed critical restenosis at the cephalic end of the previous left patch angioplasty as well as a severe stenosis of the left common carotid artery origin, which originated from a bovine aortic arch configuration. His right common and internal carotid arteries had become occluded. Endovascular treatment with two metallic stents was successfully performed through a surgical cutdown on the immediate supraclavicular portion of the left common carotid artery to establish antegrade and subsequently retrograde vascular access.